Relevant bibliographies by topics / Linguistic turn / Journal articles
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Linguistic turn.

Journal articles on the topic 'Linguistic turn'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 10 January 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Linguistic turn.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Ball, Terence. "Hobbes' Linguistic Turn." Polity 17, no. 4 (June 1985): 739–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3234572.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Piker, Joshua Aaron. "A New Turn for the Linguistic Turn." Reviews in American History 28, no. 3 (2000): 360–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rah.2000.0061.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Falk, Julia S. "Turn to the history of linguistics." Historiographia Linguistica 30, no. 1-2 (September 16, 2003): 129–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.30.1.05fal.

Full text
Abstract:
Summary In the 1940s and 1950s, the leading proponents of American synchronic linguistics showed little interest in the history of linguistics. Some attention to historiography occurred in subfields of linguistics closest to the humanities – linguistic anthropology, historical linguistics, modern European languages – but the ‘science of language’ developed by Leonard Bloomfield and his descriptivist followers demanded autonomy from other disciplines and from the past. Increasing American contact with European linguistics during the 1950s culminated in the 1962 Ninth International Congress of Linguists in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Here Noam Chomsky presented a plenary session paper that appeared in print in four versions between 1962 and 1964, each version incorporating an increasing amount of discussion of the early 20th-century precursors to the descriptivists and a number of 17th- and 19th-century studies of language and mind. Charles Hockett responded by organizing his 1964 presidential address to the Linguistic Society of America as a history of linguistics, emphasizing periods, figures, and ideas not included in Chomsky’s work. Historiographers of the time recognized a surge of American interest in the history of linguistics beginning in the early 1960s and most attributed it largely to Chomsky’s work. Historiographic publication increased significantly among the descriptivists; at the same time it emerged among the generativists, most of whom followed Chomsky in exploring pre-20th-century philosophical ideas or reconsidering concepts and practices of the descriptivists’ forerunners. The resulting visibility and impetus to the history of linguistics contributed to the foundation upon which linguistic historiography matured in North America in the later decades of the 20th century.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Simco, Nancy. "THE LINGUISTIC TURN, AGAIN." Southwest Philosophy Review 5, no. 1 (1989): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview1989511.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pellauer, David. "Ricœur’s Own Linguistic Turn." Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 5, no. 1 (July 15, 2014): 115–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/errs.2014.217.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractI want to discuss why it makes sense to speak of a linguistic turn in the philosophy of Paul Ricœur. He early on had said that “the word is my kingdom and I am not ashamed of it” without, at that time, spelling out just what this claim meant as regards a broader philosophy of language. Nor would he have had any difficulty in admitting that his attitude toward language and questions about language changed over time.Keywords : Analytic Philosophy, Linguistic Turn. RésuméJe souhaite discuter pourquoi il y a un sens à parler de tournant linguistique dans la philosophie de Paul Ricœur. Il avait dit dès le début de son travail “la parole est mon royaume et je n'en ai point honte,” sans, à ce moment-là, spécifier ce que cette affirmation signifie au regard d'une philosophie du langage. Et il n'aurait pas eu de difficulté à admettre que son attitude envers le langage et les questions sur le langage a changé au fil du temps.Mots-clés: Philosophie analytique, Tournant linguistique.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Waldstreicher, David. "The First Linguistic Turn." Reviews in American History 27, no. 1 (1999): 14–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rah.1999.0022.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Vann, Richard T. "Louis Mink's Linguistic Turn." History and Theory 26, no. 1 (February 1987): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2505256.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Skupien, Janet. "Completing the linguistic turn." Philosophy & Social Criticism 22, no. 1 (January 1996): 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019145379602200102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ng, Eve. "Linguistics and ‘The Linguistic Turn’: Language, Reality, and Knowledge." Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 24, no. 1 (August 25, 1998): 173. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v24i1.1230.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cerutti, Simona. "Le linguistic turn en Angleterre." Enquête, no. 5 (September 1, 1997): 125–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/enquete.1183.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Weiner, Joan. "Frege and the Linguistic Turn." Philosophical Topics 25, no. 2 (1997): 265–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199725217.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

hixson, walter l. "Leffler Takes a Linguistic Turn." Diplomatic History 29, no. 3 (June 2005): 419–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2005.00493.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Attwell, D. "Fiction and the Linguistic Turn." NOVEL A Forum on Fiction 46, no. 1 (March 1, 2013): 169–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00295132-2019218.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Fisch, Menachem. "Taking the Linguistic Turn Seriously." European Legacy 13, no. 5 (August 2008): 605–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10848770802268790.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Frie, Roger. "Psychoanalysis and the Linguistic Turn." Contemporary Psychoanalysis 35, no. 4 (October 1999): 673–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1999.10746408.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Musson, Gill, Laurie Cohen, and Susanne Tietze. "Pedagogy and the ‘Linguistic Turn’." Management Learning 38, no. 1 (February 2007): 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350507607073022.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Falk, Julia S. "Turn to the History of Linguistics: Noam Chomsky and Charles Hockett in the 1960s." Historiographia Linguistica International Journal for the History of the Language Sciences 30, no. 1-2 (2003): 129–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.30.1-2.05fal.

Full text
Abstract:
SUMMARY In the 1940s and 1950s, the leading proponents of American synchronic linguistics showed little interest in the history of linguistics. Some attention to historiography occurred in subfields of linguistics closest to the humanities — linguistic anthropology, historical linguistics, modern European languages — but the ‘science of language’ developed by Leonard Bloomfield and his descriptivist followers demanded autonomy from other disciplines and from the past. Increasing American contact with European linguistics during the 1950s culminated in the 1962 Ninth International Congress of Linguists in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Here Noam Chomsky presented a plenary session paper that appeared in print in four versions between 1962 and 1964, each version incorporating an increasing amount of discussion of the early 20th-century precursors to the descriptivists and a number of 17th- and 19th-century studies of language and mind. Charles Hockett responded by organizing his 1964 presidential address to the Linguistic Society of America as a history of linguistics, emphasizing periods, figures, and ideas not included in Chomsky’s work. Historiographers of the time recognized a surge of American interest in the history of linguistics beginning in the early 1960s and most attributed it largely to Chomsky’s work. Historiographic publication increased significantly among the descriptivists; at the same time it emerged among the generativists, most of whom followed Chomsky in exploring pre-20th-century philosophical ideas or reconsidering concepts and practices of the descriptivists’ forerunners. The resulting visibility and impetus to the history of linguistics contributed to the foundation upon which linguistic historiography matured in North America in the later decades of the 20th century.RÉSUMÉ Durant les années quarante et cinquante, les chercheurs les plus importants en linguistique synchronique américaine ne manifestèrent que peu d ‘intérêt envers l’histoire de la linguistique. On accorda une certaine attention à l’historiographie au sein de sous-domaines de la linguistique liés plus intimement aux sciences humaines, tels que l’anthropologie linguistique, la linguistique historique ou les langues européennes modernes, mais la ‘science du langage’ qui avait vu le jour sous Leonard Bloomfield et ses disciples descriptivistes se devait d ‘être autonome face aux autres domaines d’études comme face au passé. La croissance des liens entre linguistes américains et européens durant les années cinquante culmina lors du neuvième congrès internationaldes linguistes, à Cambridge, au Massachusetts, en 1962. Noam Chomsky y fit une présentation de session plénière qui apparaîtra en quatre versions écrites entre 1962 et 1964, chaque nouvelle version soulevant de plus en plus de points liés aux précurseurs, au début du XXe siècle, des descriptivistes, ainsi qu’à un nombre d’études, datant du XVIIe au XIXe siècle, traitant de la langue et de la pensée. En réponse à cela, Charles Hockett, dans son discours présidentielde 1964 à la Linguistic Society of America, présenta une histoire de la linguistique, soulignant les époques, les individus marquants et les idées dont ne tenait compte Chomsky dans ses travaux. Les historiographes de l’époque constatèrent un vif intérêt américain vis-à-vis l’histoire de la linguistique au début des années soixante, et, pour la plupart, l’attribuèrent aux travaux de Chomsky. De la part des descriptivistes on assista à une croissance du nombre d’écrits traitant d’historiographie, comme de la part des générativistes, dont la plupart suivirent Chomsky en ce qu’ils exploraient des idées philosophiques antérieures au vingtième siècle ou portaient un regard nouveau sur les concepts et la réalité des précurseurs des descriptivistes. La visibilité et la poussée de l’avant données ainsi à l’histoire de la linguistique ont contribué à la base d’où on verra croître l’historiographie linguistique en Amérique du Nord lors des dernières décennies du XXe siècle.ZUSAMMENFASSUNG In den 1940er und 1950er Jahren zeigten die führenden Vertreter der amerikanischen synchronischen Linguistik wenig Interesse für die Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft. In einigen Nebenbereichen der Sprachforschung, die mit den Geisteswissenschaften verbunden waren, z.B. in der sprachwissenschaftlichen Anthropologie, der historischen Sprachwissenschaft oder der moderne europäischen Sprachforschung, schenkte man der Geschichtsschreibung Aufmerksamkeit, aber die von Leonard Bloomfield etablierte ‘Wissenschaft der Sprache’ und seine deskriptivistischen Nachfolger verlangten Unabhängigkeit von weiteren und älteren Wissensgebieten. Zunehmende amerikanische Beziehungen mit europäischen Sprachwissenschaftlern in den 1950er Jahren erreichten den Höhepunkt bei dem 9. Internationalem Linguisten-Kongress der in Cambridge, Massachusetts, im August 1962 statt fand. Hier hat Noam Chomsky in der Plenarsitzung seine wissenschaftliche Abhandlung vorgelegt, die zwischen 1962 und 1964 in vier verschiedenen Fassungen veröffentlicht wurde. Jede Version enthielt weitere Erörterungen der deskriptivistischen Vorläufer des frühen 20. Jahrhunderts, sowohl wie einige Studien zum Thema ‘Sprache und Geist’ des 17. und 19. Jahrhunderts. Charles Hockett erwiderte darauf, in dem er in seinem Vortrag d.J. 1964 als Präsident der Linguistic Society of America die Geschichte der Linguistik die Zeitspannen, Persönlichkeiten und Begriffe, die nicht in Chomskys Darstellung vorkamen, hervorhob. Die damaligen Historiographen erkannten hierin einen plötzlichen Anstieg des amerikanische Interesses für die Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft, das die meisten hauptsächlich auf Chomskys Abhandlung zurückführten. Historigraphische Arbeiten vermehrten sich bedeutend bei den Deskriptivisten; zur gleichen Zeit traten sie auch bei den Generativisten hervor, die Chomsky in der Untersuchung der philosophischen Gedanken der Zeit vor dem 20. Jahrhundert folgten oder die Ideeen und Arbeiten der deskriptivistischen Vorgänger von neuem erwägten. Dieses Interesse trug schließlich zur Stärkung der Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei, so daß die linguistische Historiographie in Nordamerika sich in den letzten Jahrzehnten des 20. Jahrhunderts voll entwickeln konnte.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Orlemanski, Julie. "Philology and the Turn Away from the Linguistic Turn." Florilegium 32 (January 2015): 157–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/flor.32.007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Shin, Dongil. "Linguistic Turn, Critical Linguistics, and Critical Discourse Studies as Research Methodology." Korean Association for Qualitative Inquiry 4, no. 3 (September 30, 2018): 1–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.30940/jqi.2018.4.3.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Hammermeister, Kai, and Cristina Lafont. "The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy." German Studies Review 24, no. 1 (February 2001): 259. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1433234.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Claviez. "Neorealism, Contingency and the Linguistic Turn." Humanities 8, no. 4 (November 8, 2019): 176. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/h8040176.

Full text
Abstract:
Since the publication of Roman Jakobson’s famous 1956 essay “Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances”, we have tended to read the relationship between metaphor and metonymy as a dialectical one. The essay argues that this approach stands in need of revision, since metonymy, as a trope—and as a trope, moreover, of contingency—undermines the dialectical relationship between the syntagmatic and the paradigmatic axes. This has far-reaching implications, specifically for the assessment of literature and its ethics. Since metaphor functions structurally analogous to dialectics itself, metonymy and its role in realism and neorealism might offer us a way to think an “ethics of contingency” that acknowledges the role of contingency, rather that suppressing it and its role in preventing closure through sublation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

LEILICH, J. "SPRACHPHILOSOPHIE, KOPERNIKANISCHE WENDE UND ‘LINGUISTIC TURN’." Bijdragen 46, no. 2 (January 1985): 141–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/bij.46.2.2016255.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

엄정식. "Analytic Philosophy and the Linguistic Turn." Sogang Journal of Philosophy 27, no. ll (November 2011): 9–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.17325/sgjp.2011.27..9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Riepe, M. "Lacans linguistic turn. Das Seminar V." Zeitschrift für psychoanalytische Theorie und Praxis 23, no. 4 (2008): 458–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.15534/zptp/2008/4/6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Juan, Liu. "On the linguistic turn in sociology." Социологические исследования, no. 7 (2018): 115–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s013216250000185-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Bainus, Arry, and Junita Budi Rachman. "EDITORIAL: Linguistic Turn dalam Hubungan Internasional." Intermestic: Journal of International Studies 4, no. 1 (November 29, 2019): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v4n1.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Dilworth, Craig. "The Linguistic Turn: Shortcut or Detour?" Dialectica 46, no. 3-4 (May 23, 2005): 201–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1992.tb00172.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Carver, Terrell. "discourse analysis and the ‘linguistic turn’." European Political Science 2, no. 1 (September 2002): 50–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2002.46.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Childers, Thomas. "Political Sociology and the “Linguistic Turn”." Central European History 22, no. 3-4 (September 1989): 381–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008938900020549.

Full text
Abstract:
As we enter a new decade, it is virtually impossible to pick up a historical journal, browse through a book store, or attend a scholarly conference without confronting the growing presence of “language” or “discourse” in historical inquiry. Explications of, disputes within, and challenges to various literary and linguistic theories, especially poststructuralist approaches, ring out from virtually every corner of scholarly endeavor. Yet, while our counterparts in French, English and, increasingly, American history have taken up poststructuralist theories and methods in dealing with the past, those of us writing German history have remained for the most part caught on a conceptual roundabout, uncertain whether to follow familiar, proven routes or fight through the resistant professional traffic and to take the “linguistic turn” into uncharted territory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

BENTLEY, MICHAEL. "VICTORIAN POLITICS AND THE LINGUISTIC TURN." Historical Journal 42, no. 3 (September 1999): 883–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x99008560.

Full text
Abstract:
This article subjects a variety of works on nineteenth-century politics to critical analysis, focusing on recent work in biography, popular politics, and on those works that have shown an interest in post-structuralist approaches. Mostly it examines texts produced between 1993 and about 1997 with a view to sensing an historiographical mood. Although the argument urges an open-minded reception to the linguistic turn in historical work, it brings the work of some of its adherents – perhaps especially James Vernon – under critical scrutiny and concludes that a price has been paid for the attempt at constructing a ‘cultural politics’. In particular the article expresses alarm at the apparent incoherence and sub-literacy of some post-structural statements.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

HOPP, Walter. "HUSSERL, DUMMETT, AND THE LINGUISTIC TURN." Grazer Philosophische Studien 78, no. 1 (2009): 17–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789042026056_003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

McKenna, Allen, and Mike Metcalfe. "The linguistic turn in project conceptualization." International Journal of Project Management 31, no. 8 (November 2013): 1154–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Yunxing, Li. "A turn in the linguistic approach." Perspectives 11, no. 1 (January 2003): 63–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0907676x.2003.9961463.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Englund, Tomas. "The linguistic turn within curriculum theory." Pedagogy, Culture & Society 19, no. 2 (July 2011): 193–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.582256.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Abu-Dayyeh, Nabil. "Public urban space: The linguistic turn." Cogent Arts & Humanities 5, no. 1 (January 1, 2018): 1523515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1523515.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Mondada, Lorenza. "L’interprétation online par les co-participants de la structuration du tour in fieri en TCUs: évidences multimodales." Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique, no. 47 (December 1, 2007): 7–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.26034/tranel.2007.2732.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper deals with a central notion of interactional linguistics, the "turn-constructional unit" (TCU), which organizes turns at talk as they are locally managed by the participants. Thus, the paper begins with a reminder concerning the place of TCU within the turn- taking model (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974) and within the literature in interactional linguistics. The latter works on the way in which linguistic resources are exploited in a situated and sequentially sensitive manner for the construction of turns. On this basis, the paper focuses on a central problem for the endogenous definition of TCUs: these units are flexibly, dynamically, actively achieved by the participants in the course of their actions; therefore the question is how can we demonstrate participants' actual orientations towards the emergence, organization and completion of TCUs? The paper answers to this question by looking at gestures as emboding the local interpretation of TCUs by the participants. In this way, the paper contributes to a better understanding of TCUs as units locally defined not only thanks linguistic resources but also thanks multimodal resources, for all practical purposes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Da Silva Barreto Júnior, Williem, and Henriete Karam. "Linguistic turn, Wittgenstein, Gadamer e o direito." Revista Brasileira de Direito 17, no. 3 (December 31, 2021): 4554. http://dx.doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2021.v17i3.4554.

Full text
Abstract:
O artigo aborda a viragem linguística e duas relevantes teorias dela decorrentes – a filosofia da linguagem ordinária, de L. Wittgenstein, e a hermenêutica filosófica, de H.-G. Gadamer – e tem como objetivo analisar suas possíveis contribuições para a superação do paradigma positivista no direito. Para isso, emprega o método hermenêutico, os procedimentos da pesquisa bibliográfica e a abordagem qualitativa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Synytsya, Andriy. "Linguistic turn in philosophy: a critical analysis." Skhid, no. 2(148) (May 30, 2017): 105–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2017.2(148).95375.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Surkis, Judith. "When Was the Linguistic Turn? A Genealogy." American Historical Review 117, no. 3 (June 2012): 700–722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ahr.117.3.700.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Alvesson, Mats, and Dan Kärreman. "Taking the Linguistic Turn in Organizational Research." Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36, no. 2 (June 2000): 136–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886300362002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Geary, Dick. "Labour History, the ‘Linguistic Turn’ and Postmodernism." Contemporary European History 9, no. 3 (November 2000): 445–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0960777300003088.

Full text
Abstract:
This article begins by examining recent work on labour history by some French and British historians, who have been influenced by postmodernism and the ‘linguistic turn’ but often find themselves locked into what are primarily ‘cultural’ explanations of labour's identity and development. It disputes the culturalist methodology and stresses that an alternative model of discourse analysis insists on contextualisation, which in turn re-instates the significance of realms of explanation outside language, text and culture. It also sees the comparative method as a means of identifying historical structures, and concludes with a schematic account of European labour in the twentieth century.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Craig, Holly K., and Julie A. Washington. "Children's turn-taking behaviors Social-linguistic interactions." Journal of Pragmatics 10, no. 2 (April 1986): 173–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(86)90086-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Deetz, Stanley. "Reclaiming the Legacy of the Linguistic Turn." Organization 10, no. 3 (August 2003): 421–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13505084030103002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

ARSLAN, CÜNEYT. "EDEBİYAT BİLİMİ KURAMLARININ GELİŞİMİNDE 'LINGUISTIC TURN OLGUSU." Journal of International Social Research 9, no. 42 (February 28, 2016): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20164216124.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Wang, Yongxiang. "“Language” and “discourse”: Two perspectives on linguistic philosophy." Semiotica 2018, no. 224 (September 25, 2018): 295–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0207.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractWith the establishment of modern linguistics and the linguistic turn of western philosophy, various linguistic theories have been advanced and have given different interpretations to language and discourse. Different schools of thought have witnessed a direct collision of ideas and a deep academic dialogue between the theory of translinguistics advanced by the great master of dialogism, Bakhtin, and the outlook on language of the father of modern linguistics, Saussure.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Skripnik, Konstantin D. "Metaphilosophy of philosophical “turns”: case study." Philosophy Journal 16, no. 3 (2023): 55–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-3-55-68.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of the article is to consider the phenomenon of philosophical “turn” in the framework of descriptive metaphilosophy. Using the example of analytical, linguis­tic, pragmatic and ontological turns, an attempt is made to highlight the characteristic fea­tures of “turns”. The author shows that the analytical turn is associated with the develop­ment of methods of philosophy, primarily with the diversification of the concept of analy­sis itself. Consideration of the linguistic turn leads to the position that its characterization as a change in the subject of philosophy is not quite adequate – in fact, it is a change in the methods of philosophical analysis, which leads to the emergence of new problem areas not only in philosophy, but also in linguistics. The pragmatic turn is characterized by emphasizing the role of pragmatism in overcoming the existing opposition of analytic and continental philosophy through the use of both logical and, for example, axiological methods or the “pragmatic principle”. The ontological turn, characteristic of anthropol­ogy, the philosophy of technology, as well as for “general” philosophy, is associated with a change in the methods of analysis in the direction of solving the problem of seeing “things in a new way” and how “they really are”. The analysis in the case of an ontologi­cal turn is aimed not so much at “multiculturalism” as at “multi-naturalism”, at taking into account the active role of the subject and building the research models capable of taking this into account. The final position of the author is that according to which a “turn” is a change in research methods that leads to the formation of a new subject area and the formulation of new problems. They, in turn, stimulate the next “turn” and the de­velopment of new methods and methodologies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Djalilova, Z. O. "A DISCOURSIVE TURN IN THE THEORY OF LINGUISTIC POLITENESS: TO THE FORMATION OF THE THEORY OF LINGUISTIC IMPOLITENESS." International Journal Of Literature And Languages 03, no. 02 (February 1, 2023): 15–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/ijll/volume03issue02-05.

Full text
Abstract:
As Barbara Pizziconi notes, numerous studies in the field of linguistic politeness, starting from the mid-70s of the 20th century, i.e. since the birth of the later famous theories of R. Lakoff, J. Leach, as well as the universal theory of linguistic politeness by P. Brown and S. Levinson, play a very important role in modern pragmatic works. Nevertheless, although the number of publications on this issue is steadily growing, there is no single, generally accepted definition of the social and communicative phenomenon of politeness. There is also no unity among scientists in understanding the very nature of linguistic politeness (Pizziconi 2006: 706).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker. "Twenty years of historical pragmatics." Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16, no. 1 (April 3, 2015): 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.01taa.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper provides an outline of the changes in linguistics that gave rise to historical pragmatics in the 1990s and that have shaped its development over the twenty years of its existence. These changes have affected virtually all aspects of linguistic analyses: the nature of the data, the research questions, the methods and tools that are being used for the analysis, as well as the nature of the generalizations and findings that result from these investigations. We deal with the changes in terms of shifts in thought styles and discuss seven different turns: the pragmatic turn, the socio-cultural turn, the dispersive turn, the empirical turn, the digital turn, the discursive turn and the diachronic turn. We also deal with some long-standing, recent or emerging interfaces where historical pragmatics interacts with other disciplines and we discuss some future challenges, such as the multimodality and fluidity of communication and the problem of combining big data with pragmatic micro analyses.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Janda, Laura A. "Quantitative perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics." Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17, no. 1 (August 20, 2019): 7–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00024.jan.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract As a usage-based approach to the study language, cognitive linguistics is theoretically well poised to apply quantitative methods to the analysis of corpus and experimental data. In this article, I review the historical circumstances that led to the quantitative turn in cognitive linguistics and give an overview of statistical models used by cognitive linguists, including chi-square test, Fisher test, Binomial test, t-test, ANOVA, correlation, regression, classification and regression trees, naïve discriminative learning, cluster analysis, multi-dimensional scaling, and correspondence analysis. I stress the essential role of introspection in the design and interpretation of linguistic studies, and assess the pros and cons of the quantitative turn. I also make a case for open access science and appropriate archiving of linguistic data.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Fabrício, Branca Falabella. "MOBILITY AND DISCOURSE CIRCULATION IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD: THE TURN OF THE REFERENTIAL SCREW." Revista da Anpoll 1, no. 40 (June 28, 2016): 129–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.18309/anp.v1i40.1022.

Full text
Abstract:
In this paper I call into question the referential paradigm, drawing on the conceptual framework developed by contemporary Anthropology, Linguistic Anthropology, Sociolinguistics and Applied Linguistics. I call for the urgent problematization of the so-called referential metaphysics while arguing that constructs such as entextualization and indexicality can shake the strong representational tradition in the field of language studies – a tradition sustained by an infectious modernist linguistic ideology and authoritarian and monist models of reality. The latter have been losing ground, as an explanatory apparatus, amidst the intense mobility and complexity of globalization processes which require new theoretical-analytical tools. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Linguistic turn' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography