To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Likert.

Journal articles on the topic 'Likert'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Likert.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Kim, Kwangmin. "Likert Scale." Korean Journal of Family Medicine 32, no. 1 (2011): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2011.32.1.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Stratton, Samuel J. "Likert Data." Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 33, no. 2 (2018): 117–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x18000237.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Emerson, Robert Wall. "Likert Scales." Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 111, no. 5 (2017): 488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1711100511.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Koo, Malcolm, and Shih-Wei Yang. "Likert-Type Scale." Encyclopedia 5, no. 1 (2025): 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010018.

Full text
Abstract:
The Likert-type scale is a widely used psychometric instrument for measuring attitudes, opinions, or perceptions in research contexts. It presents respondents with a series of statements accompanied by symmetrical response options, typically structured on a five-point scale ranging from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree”. Each point on the scale represents a gradation of agreement or sentiment, allowing researchers to transform subjective responses into quantifiable data for statistical analysis and interpretation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pye, Hayley, Saurabh Singh, Joseph M. Norris, et al. "Evaluation of PSA and PSA Density in a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Directed Diagnostic Pathway for Suspected Prostate Cancer: The INNOVATE Trial." Cancers 13, no. 8 (2021): 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081985.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives: To assess the clinical outcomes of mpMRI before biopsy and evaluate the space remaining for novel biomarkers. Methods: The INNOVATE study was set up to evaluate the validity of novel fluidic biomarkers in men with suspected prostate cancer who undergo pre-biopsy mpMRI. We report the characteristics of this clinical cohort, the distribution of clinical serum biomarkers, PSA and PSA density (PSAD), and compare the mpMRI Likert scoring system to the Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System v2.1 (PI-RADS) in men undergoing biopsy. Results: 340 men underwent mpMRI to evaluate suspecte
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Duncan, Otis Dudley, and Magnus Stenbeck. "Are Likert scales unidimensional?" Social Science Research 16, no. 3 (1987): 245–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0049-089x(87)90003-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Albaum, Gerald. "The Likert Scale Revisited." Market Research Society. Journal. 39, no. 2 (1997): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147078539703900202.

Full text
Abstract:
This study examined the effect of alternative scale formats on reporting of intensity of attitudes on Likert scales of agreement. A standard one-stage format and an alternate two-stage format were tested in three separate studies on samples of university students in three countries. In general the two-stage format generated the greatest percentage of extreme-position (i.e. most intense) responses across scales. A test of predictive ability showed that the two-stage format was a better predictor of product preferences. Underlying data structures did not differ much between the two.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Pervez, A. K. M. Kanak, Md Maniruzzaman, Ashfaq Ahmad Shah, Nur Nabi, and Abdou Matsalabi Ado. "The Meagerness of Simple Likert Scale in Assessing Risk: How Appropriate the Fuzzy Likert is?" NUST Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 6, no. 2 (2021): 138–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.51732/njssh.v6i2.55.

Full text
Abstract:
Social scientists around the world commonly use the Likert scale. The scale has some limitations; in many cases, researchers are ignoring those limitations. Many social scientists have been trying to find out an alternative, but all initiatives do not correctly solve the problems. Among all limitations, the most critical issue is that Likert scale adopts a similar variance between two successive scale points. Fuzzy-Likert scale is a useful alternative for solving the existing limitation of the traditional Likert scale. Therefore, the current article describes the limitations of existing Likert
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Joshi, Ankur, Saket Kale, Satish Chandel, and D. Pal. "Likert Scale: Explored and Explained." British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 7, no. 4 (2015): 396–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Shiina, Kenpei. "Cursor movement in Likert ratings." Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 82 (September 25, 2018): 3EV—046–3EV—046. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.82.0_3ev-046.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Gritsch, Simone. "Die Likert-Skala – Meinungen abbilden." ergopraxis 5, no. 01 (2012): 16–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1300814.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Gunderman, Richard B., and Stephen Chan. "The 13-Point Likert Scale." Academic Radiology 20, no. 11 (2013): 1466–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.04.010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

K.S.N, Prasad, Vijaya Saradhi M.V, and Rudra Kumar M. "Likert-Rating Consensus for SRS Documentation." HELIX 11, no. 5 (2021): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.29042/2021-11-5-1-10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Albaum, Gerald, and Brian D. Murphy. "Extreme Response on a Likert Scale." Psychological Reports 63, no. 2 (1988): 501–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.63.2.501.

Full text
Abstract:
This study examined the effect of alternative scale formats on reporting of extreme attitudes on Liken scales of agreement. The formats were tested on samples of university students who responded to a set of statements about economic systems. In general, a two-stage format generated a greater percentage of extreme-position responses than did the common one-stage format, with a modified one-stage version falling in between.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Böckenholt, Ulf. "Measuring response styles in Likert items." Psychological Methods 22, no. 1 (2017): 69–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000106.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Pell, Godfrey. "Use and misuse of Likert scales." Medical Education 39, no. 9 (2005): 970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02237.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Gregoire, Timothy G. "Analysis of Likert-scale data revisited." Psychological Bulletin 105, no. 1 (1989): 171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092469.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Hartley, James. "Some thoughts on Likert-type scales." International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 14, no. 1 (2014): 83–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1697-2600(14)70040-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Watson, Nicholas C. "Likert or Not, We Are Biased." Anesthesiology 116, no. 5 (2012): 1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e3182503a86.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

เทพวรชัย, สุชาดา. "บทวิจัย : ควรใช้ X กับข้อมูลจากแบบสอบถาม Likert หรือไม่ ?" Journal of Education Studies 28, № 3 (2000): 121–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.58837/chula.educu.28.3.15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Lindner, James R., and Nicholas Lindner. "Interpreting Likert type, summated, unidimensional, and attitudinal scales: I neither agree nor disagree, Likert or not." Advancements in Agricultural Development 5, no. 2 (2024): 152–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i2.351.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper provides a rationale and convention for discussing the true limits and interpretation of data collected using unidimensional, summated, Likert-type, and attitudinal scales used in research investigating human behavior, sociology, education, psychology, and other related fields of study. All vague quantifiers must be described in methods and findings. The true limits of the scale and of each vague quantifier should be described. This information should be placed in the methods section. A five-point summated scale, for example, can be interpreted as follows: Strongly Agree = 5 - 4.51,
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Leonor, M. M. Rosa, G. S. Manaces Easud, and P. P. Luis Fernando. "Indeterminate Likert Scale in Social Sciences Research." International Journal of Neutrosophic Science 19, no. 1 (2022): 289–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.54216/ijns.190125.

Full text
Abstract:
The Likert scale is by far the most popular psychometric tool for collecting data. The ordinal structure and confined style of the Likert scale make it prone to information misinterpretation and loss. Depending on the consumers' moods, replies in the real world are sometimes erratic, imprecise, and ill-defined. Neutrosophy (the study of the implementation of the provisions and indeterminacy) is utilized to accurately portray the answers. This work introduces a neutrosophic-informed, agnostic version of the Likert scale. Clustering users based on their comments is an efficient method of segment
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Darnton, Geoffrey. "Likert scales and questions: uses and abuses." European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies 22, no. 1 (2023): 44–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.22.1.1748.

Full text
Abstract:
when conducting business and management research, the most common strategy employed for collecting primary data is either interviews or questionnaires (or both). When questionnaires are used to collect primary data a very common approach used is to construct questions which can be called Likert-type questions or Likert scales. Numbers are allocated to the question responses of each question.. Often, this is followed by performing arithmetic or statistical operations on the allocated numbers. In many cases encountered by the author, the analysis has even included techniques such as parametric s
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Westland, J. Christopher. "Information loss and bias in likert survey responses." PLOS ONE 17, no. 7 (2022): e0271949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271949.

Full text
Abstract:
Likert response surveys are widely applied in marketing, public opinion polls, epidemiological and economic disciplines. Theoretically, Likert mapping from real-world beliefs could lose significant amounts of information, as they are discrete categorical metrics. Similarly, the subjective nature of Likert-scale data capture, through questionnaires, holds the potential to inject researcher biases into the statistical analysis. Arguments and counterexamples are provided to show how this loss and bias can potentially be substantial under extreme polarization or strong beliefs held by the surveyed
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Nikita Dewi and Joko Soebagyo. "Analisis Bibliometrik terhadap Likert Scale Mathematics Berbasis VOSViewer." Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika 12, no. 1 (2022): 71–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.36456/buanamatematika.v12i1.5837.

Full text
Abstract:
This bibliometric analysis focuses on publications related to the Likert scale using VOSViewer based on Google Scholar data. This study was conducted to determine the number of international publications on the trend of research development using a Likert scale in the time interval between years 0-0. The data search was carried out using the PoP (Publish or Perish) software based on Google Scholar with the keywords Likert Scale Mathematics. The data is in the form of journals with a sample of 1000 journals. Then the data were analyzed using VOSViewer and Ms Excel. The results showed that the n
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Mirahmadizadeh, Alireza, Hamed Delam, Mozhgan Seif, and Reyhaneh Bahrami. "Designing, Constructing, and Analyzing Likert Scale Data." Journal of Education and Community Health 5, no. 3 (2018): 63–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.21859/jech.5.3.63.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Uz Zaman, Nadeem, Zainab Bibi, Sana Ur Rehman Sheikh, and Abdul Raziq. "Manualizing Factor Analysis of Likert Scale Data." Journal of Management Sciences 7, no. 2 (2020): 56–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.2007204.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Yamashita, Taichi. "Analyzing Likert scale surveys with Rasch models." Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1, no. 3 (2022): 100022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100022.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Gobo, Giampietro. "Ritorno a Likert. Verso una survey discorsiva." SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE, no. 88 (December 2009): 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/sr2009-088001.

Full text
Abstract:
- For decades, the dilemma between open-ended and closed-ended response alternatives occupied the methodological debate. Over the years, dominant approaches in survey have reacted to this dilemma by opting for fixed response alternatives and the standardization of interviewer's behaviour. If this methodological decision has been the survey's fortune, making it the methodology most widely used in the social sciences, however it produces a large amount of biases well known in the literature. In order to re- medy these biases an alternative proposal can be designed by re-discovering and adapting
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Kang, Man-Ki, Chang-Eun Lee, and Gue-Tak Chio. "Fuzzy Hypotheses Testing of Likert Fuzzy Scale." Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems 15, no. 5 (2005): 533–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5391/jkiis.2005.15.5.533.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Drasgow, Fritz, Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko, and Stephen Stark. "75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right!" Industrial and Organizational Psychology 3, no. 4 (2010): 465–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01273.x.

Full text
Abstract:
For over three-quarters of a century researchers and practitioners have analyzed rating scale data using methods that assume a dominance response process wherein an individual high on the trait assessed is assumed to answer positively with high probability. This approach derives from Likert's famous 1932 approach to the development and analysis of rating scales. In this paper, we argue that Likert scaling and related methods are misguided. Instead, we propose that methods that have evolved from Thurstone (1927, 1928, 1929) scaling provide a better representation of the choice process underlyin
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Carr, Stuart C., Vanessa Powell, Maria Knezovic, Don Munro, and Malcolm MacLachlan. "Measuring motivational gravity: Likert or scenario scaling?" Journal of Managerial Psychology 11, no. 5 (1996): 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683949610124816.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

FLASKERUD, JACQUELYN H. "Is the Likert Scale Format Culturally Biased?" Nursing Research 37, no. 3 (1988): 185???186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198805000-00013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Mellor, D., and K. A. Moore. "The Use of Likert Scales With Children." Journal of Pediatric Psychology 39, no. 3 (2013): 369–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst079.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Flaskerud, Jacquelyn H. "Cultural Bias and Likert-Type Scales Revisited." Issues in Mental Health Nursing 33, no. 2 (2012): 130–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2011.600510.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Chan, Jason C. "Response-Order Effects in Likert-Type Scales." Educational and Psychological Measurement 51, no. 3 (1991): 531–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164491513002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Jamieson, Susan. "Likert scales: how to (ab)use them." Medical Education 38, no. 12 (2004): 1217–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Woods, Carol M. "Ramsay Curve IRT for Likert-Type Data." Applied Psychological Measurement 31, no. 3 (2007): 195–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621606291567.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Hodge, D. R., and D. Gillespie. "Phrase completions: An alternative to Likert scales." Social Work Research 27, no. 1 (2003): 45–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.1.45.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Doe, Raymond, Bryan A. Landrum, Kaelyn M. Lewis, Matthew E. Glenn, and Jacob D. Smith. "Likert Items: Should(n’t) We Really Care?" International Journal of Social Science Studies 11, no. 1 (2022): 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v11i1.5747.

Full text
Abstract:
One of the controversial methodological topics in the social and behavioral sciences is the (ab)use of Likert Scale items, Likert-type items and ranked ordered response categories. The debate is whether parametric tests can be legitimately conducted on technically ordinal response categories that are represented with numbers. Participants answered survey questions on moral disengagement, where we changed the intervals of seven response categories and tested whether assigning numbers made any difference in two separate studies. The results showed that participants’ ratings were not significantl
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Simamora, Bilson. "Skala Likert, Bias Penggunaan dan Jalan Keluarnya." Jurnal Manajemen 12, no. 1 (2022): 84–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.46806/jman.v12i1.978.

Full text
Abstract:
Many researchers refer to any graded scale as a Likert scale. In addition to misnaming, this assumption can lead to errors in the data scale and analysis technique. This paper aims to explain the instrument scales in the survey and the data types they generate. Thus, the position of the Likert scale compared to other measurement scales becomes apparent so that researchers can give the right name to the scale they use and choose the proper data analysis technique according to its type.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Iyo, Iyo, Manuel Ricardo Vel� .., Javier D. Bosquez .., and Marina Abdurashidova. "Neutrosophic Likert Scale for Evaluating Environmental Sanctions." International Journal of Neutrosophic Science 24, no. 1 (2024): 24–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.54216/ijns.240103.

Full text
Abstract:
One of the fundamental tools to guarantee compliance with environmental laws is the sanctions, which act as deterrent mechanisms against possible violations. The present study focused on evaluating public perceptions towards environmental policies and sanctions, applying a methodology that integrates neutrosophy and indeterminate Likert scales to capture the complexity of human opinions on environmental legislation. By distributing a structured questionnaire to a representative sample, data was collected and subsequently analyzed using neutrosophic logic and cluster analysis techniques. The re
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Cheng, Che, Keng-Ling Lay, Yung-Fong Hsu, and Yi-Miau Tsai. "Can Likert scales predict choices? Testing the congruence between using Likert scale and comparative judgment on measuring attribution." Methods in Psychology 5 (December 2021): 100081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100081.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Carifio, James, and Rocco J. Perla. "Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes." Journal of Social Sciences 3, no. 3 (2007): 106–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Suasapha, Anom Hery. "SKALA LIKERT UNTUK PENELITIAN PARIWISATA; BEBERAPA CATATAN UNTUK MENYUSUNNYA DENGAN BAIK." JURNAL KEPARIWISATAAN 19, no. 1 (2020): 26–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.52352/jpar.v19i1.407.

Full text
Abstract:
Artikel ini merupakan sebuah artikel studi literatur (literature review article) yang disusun dengan metode literatur review. Hal yang mendasari penulisan artikel ini adalah keinginan untuk memahami lebih baik mengenai Skala Likert dengan membaca beberapa literatur dan menuangkan hasilnya ke dalam bentuk manuskrip. Topik yang diulas melalui penulisan artikel ini adalah mengenai Skala Likert, sehingga kata kunci yang dipergunakan untuk mengumpulkan data, yang dalam hal ini adalah pustaka berupa buku maupun artikel jurnal adalah “Skala Likert”. Sebanyak 27 pustaka yang membahas mengenai Skala Li
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Baghaei, Purya, and Farshad Effatpanah. "Nonparametric Kernel Smoothing Item Response Theory Analysis of Likert Items." Psych 6, no. 1 (2024): 236–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/psych6010015.

Full text
Abstract:
Likert scales are the most common psychometric response scales in the social and behavioral sciences. Likert items are typically used to measure individuals’ attitudes, perceptions, knowledge, and behavioral changes. To analyze the psychometric properties of individual Likert-type items and overall Likert scales, mostly methods based on classical test theory (CTT) are used, including corrected item–total correlations and reliability indices. CTT methods heavily rely on the total scale scores, making it challenging to directly examine the performance of items and response options across varying
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Lipovetsky, Stan, and Michael Conklin. "Decreasing Respondent Heterogeneity by Likert Scales Adjustment via Multipoles." Stats 1, no. 1 (2018): 169–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/stats1010012.

Full text
Abstract:
A description of Likert scales can be given using the multipoles technique known in quantum physics and applied to behavioral sciences data. This paper considers decomposition of Likert scales by the multipoles for the application of decreasing the respondents’ heterogeneity. Due to cultural and language differences, different respondents habitually use the lower end, the mid-scale, or the upper end of the Likert scales which can lead to distortion and inconsistency in data across respondents. A big impact of different kinds of respondent is well known, for instance, in international studies,
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

García-Fernández, Jaime, Marcelino Cuesta, Álvaro Postigo, Álvaro Menéndez-Aller, Covadonga González-Nuevo, and Eduardo García-Cueto. "Ítems tipo Likert vs. Ítems continuos: ¿Qué opción es mejor?" Revista Internacional de Sociología 82, no. 2 (2024): e252. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2024.82.2.m23-04.

Full text
Abstract:
Los ítems tipo Likert son comúnmente utilizados en ciencias sociales. Este estudio comprueba si se pueden mejorar las propiedades psicométricas de los autoinformes variando los formatos de respuesta. Los formatos comparados han sido el tipo Likert de cinco alternativas y el VAS (Visual Analog Scale). Para ello, 584 personas (75.2 % mujeres) con una edad media de 32.9 años (DT = 13.4) respondieron a dos cuestionarios online de personalidad que fueron aplicados una vez con formato tipo Likert (0-4) y una segunda vez con formato VAS (0-100). La discriminación, fiabilidad y pesos factoriales de la
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Sullivan, Gail M., and Anthony R. Artino. "Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales." Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5, no. 4 (2013): 541–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/jgme-5-4-18.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Anjaria, Kushal. "Knowledge derivation from Likert scale using Z-numbers." Information Sciences 590 (April 2022): 234–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.024.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!