Academic literature on the topic 'Lexical access'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Lexical access.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Lexical access"
Vannest, Jennifer, and Julie E. Boland. "Lexical Morphology and Lexical Access." Brain and Language 68, no. 1-2 (June 1999): 324–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2114.
Full textFeldman, Laurie Beth, Dominiek Sandra, and Marcus Taft. "Morphological Structure, Lexical Representation and Lexical Access." American Journal of Psychology 111, no. 3 (1998): 445. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1423450.
Full textCook, Svetlana V., and Kira Gor. "Lexical access in L2." Mental Lexicon 10, no. 2 (September 11, 2015): 247–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ml.10.2.04coo.
Full textNewman, Rochelle S. "Lexical access across talkers." Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31, no. 6 (April 25, 2016): 709–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1136745.
Full textAparicio, Xavier, and Jean-Marc Lavaur. "Lexical access in trilinguals." Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1, no. 1 (March 2, 2018): 42–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00003.apa.
Full textSmall, Larry H., Stephen D. Simon, and Jill S. Goldberg. "Lexical stress and lexical access: Homographs versus nonhomographs." Perception & Psychophysics 44, no. 3 (May 1988): 272–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03206295.
Full textDarcy, Isabelle, Danielle Daidone, and Chisato Kojima. "Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners." Phonological and Phonetic considerations of Lexical Processing 8, no. 3 (December 31, 2013): 372–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.3.06dar.
Full textMcNellis, Mark G., and Sheila E. Blumstein. "Self-Organizing Dynamics of Lexical Access in Normals and Aphasics." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13, no. 2 (February 1, 2001): 151–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892901564216.
Full textSCHMID, MONIKA S., and SCOTT JARVIS. "Lexical access and lexical diversity in first language attrition." Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17, no. 4 (January 16, 2014): 729–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728913000771.
Full textAndrews, Sally. "Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects?" Journal of Memory and Language 25, no. 6 (December 1986): 726–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(86)90046-x.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Lexical access"
Hodgson, James Marion. "Context effects in lexical access and lexical recognition." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/16494.
Full textToassi, Pâmela Freitas Pereira. "Investigating lexical access in multilinguals." reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSC, 2016. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/171451.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2016-12-13T03:10:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 342978.pdf: 2454590 bytes, checksum: 5029e5a16857d53c82bdc747622c1c4e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016
Abstract : The interaction of two or more languages in the bilingual/multilingual brain may influence lexical access during language comprehension and production. The present study investigated lexical access of trilingual speakers of Brazilian Portuguese, German and English in three experiments dealing with language comprehension and production. The thesis of the present study is that lexical access of multilinguals is qualitatively different from that of bilinguals and monolinguals. More specifically, the present study has the following objectives: (1) to investigate which cognates are more facilitative in the comprehension of English as a target language, double cognates (between English and German, and English and Brazilian Portuguese) or triple cognates (among English, German, and Brazilian Portuguese), (2) to investigate how lexical access is influenced by cognates among German, English and Brazilian Portuguese in the oral production of English, and (3) to investigate if there is a difference in the semantic priming effect when presented in the native (Brazilian Portuguese), non-native (German) or target language (English) for bilingual and trilingual speakers. There were 56 participants who took part in the present study, which were divided into the following groups: (1) native speakers of English ? the L1G, (2) native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese with English as the L2 ? the L2G, and (3), native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese, with German as the L2 and English as the L3 ? the L3G. Participants took part in an experimental session which consisted of three experiments: (1) an eye-tracking experiment with a sentence comprehension task containing cognates among the participants? three languages, (2) a narrative oral production experiment, in which there were pictures that represented cognate words in the participants? three languages, and (3) a cross-language priming experiment, in which participants had to name pictures (which were preceded by a masked prime, which was the name of the word in English, German or Brazilian Portuguese) in English, as fast and accurately as possible. The results of the three experiments of the present study showed that for the participants from the L3G, triple cognates facilitated the comprehension of English sentences, whereas the prime word in German caused an increase in reaction time. The results of the present study were interpreted as evidence of non-selective lexical access as well as of a common lexical storage for the trilinguals? languages. Nevertheless, an asymmetry in trilingual lexical organization is proposed, where links L1-L2, L1-L3 are stronger than links L2-L3. The thesis that lexicalaccess of trilinguals is qualitatively different from that of bilinguals was supported by the findings of the present study. The present study contributed with new data to the discussion regarding the multilingual lexicon, with a new language combination Brazilian Portuguese-German-English, in the Brazilian context.
A interação de duas ou mais línguas no cérebro bilíngue/multilíngue pode influenciar o acesso lexical durante a compreensão e a produção da linguagem. O presente estudo investigou o acesso lexical de trilíngues falantes de português brasileiro, alemão e inglês em três experimentos envolvendo a compreensão e a produção da linguagem. A tese apresentada no presente estudo é de que o acesso lexical de multilíngues é qualitativamente diferente daquele de bilíngues e monolíngues. Mais especificamente, o presente estudo tem os seguintes objetivos: (1) investigar quais cognatos facilitam mais a compreensão do inglês como língua alvo, se cognatos duplos (entre o inglês e o alemão, e, entre o inglês e o português) ou triplos (entre o inglês, o alemão, e o português), (2) investigar como o acesso lexical é influenciado por cognatos entre o alemão, o inglês e o português na produção oral de inglês, e (3) investigar se há diferença no efeito de priming semântico quando apresentado na língua materna (português), na língua não-materna (alemão) ou na língua alvo (inglês) para falantes bilíngues e trilíngues. O presente estudo contou com 56 participantes, os quais foram divididos nos seguintes grupos: (1) falantes nativos de inglês o L1G, (2) falantes nativos de português brasileiro com inglês como L2 o L2G, e (3) falantes nativos de português brasileiro, com alemão como L2 e inglês como L3 o L3G. A seção experimental consistiu de três experimentos: (1) um experimento de rastreamento ocular com uma tarefa de compreensão de sentenças contendo cognatos entre as três línguas dos participantes, (2) um experimento de produção oral de narrativa, na qual haviam figuras que representavam palavras cognatas nas três línguas dos participantes, e (3) um experimento de priming interlinguístico, no qual participantes tinham que nomear figuras (as quais eram precedidas por um prime mascarado, que podia ser o nome da palavra em inglês, em alemão ou em português) em inglês, o mais correto e rapidamente possível. Os resultados dos três experimentos do presente estudo mostraram que para os participantes do grupo L3, cognatos triplos facilitaram a compreensão das sentenças em inglês, enquanto que o prime em alemão causou um aumento no tempo de reação. Os resultados do presente estudo são interpretados como evidência de acesso lexical não-seletivo bem como de um armazenamento integrado para as três línguas do trilíngue. Com base nesses resultados, propõe-se uma assimetria na organização lexical do trilíngue, onde os links L1-L2, L1-L3 são mais fortes que os links L2-L3. A tese de que o acesso lexical de trilíngues é qualitativamente diferente daquele de bilíngues foi confirmada pelos resultados do presente estudo, o qual contribuiu com novos dados para a discussão sobre o léxico multilíngue, com uma nova combinação linguística, português brasileiro-alemão-inglês, no contexto brasileiro.
Soler, Vilageliu Olga. "Bilingual lexical access: a connectionist model." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/4768.
Full textWithers, Daniel Wyatt, and Daniel Wyatt Withers. "The Lexical Access of Function Words." Thesis, The University of Arizona, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625254.
Full textMcAllister, Janice Margaret. "Lexical stress and lexical access : effects in read and spontaneous speech." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1989. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/26744.
Full textKwantes, Peter J. "LEX, a retrieval theory of lexical access." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape10/PQDD_0004/NQ42952.pdf.
Full textClouse, Daniel Stanley. "Representing lexical semantics with context vectors and modeling lexical access with attractor networks /." Diss., Connect to a 24 p. preview or request complete full text in PDF format. Access restricted to UC campuses, 1998. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/ucsd/fullcit?p9907665.
Full textSchnadt, Michael J. "Lexical influences on disfluency production." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4424.
Full textZipse, Lauryn Rose. "A MEG investigation of lexical access in aphasia." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46658.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 105-117).
Aphasia is an acquired impairment of language ability that occurs secondary to brain damage, and auditory comprehension deficits are a defining component of aphasia. At the single-word level, these deficits are thought to arise from impaired phonological processing, semantic representations, or both. The present study examined spreading lexical activation in people with aphasia by implementing thorough clinical evaluation, a series of listening tasks, and a time sensitive means of tracking cortical activation. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to measure the cortical activity of 7 people with aphasia, 9 age-matched control participants, and 10 younger control participants as they completed an auditory lexical decision task and a passive listening task with phonemes. In the lexical decision task, target words were presented in three conditions of interest: semantically primed, where the target was preceded by a related word; identity primed, where the target was preceded by itself; and a control condition, where the target was preceded by an unrelated word. Behavioral reaction times and MEG data were collected in response to each target, and the M350, a MEG signal associated with lexical processing, was evaluated. MEG data collected during the passive listening task were used to evaluate the mismatch field (MMF), a response associated with the formation of an auditory memory trace. Analysis was conducted at both the group and single-subject levels.
(cont.) All groups showed identity priming of the M350 response, although this was seen in the amplitude dimension for the control groups but in the latency dimension for the group with aphasia. The older control group showed semantic priming of the M350 and the younger group showed a marginally significant priming effect, while the group with aphasia failed to show this effect. There was evidence that some people with aphasia may have a delayed or absent M350 response. Finally, the behavioral results indicated that the younger and older control participants were using different strategies to complete the lexical decision task. These findings highlight the potential importance of latency differences when analyzing electrophysiological responses in aphasic populations. Furthermore, they indicate that some cognitive-linguistic tasks may induce different types of processing in older and younger groups.
by Lauryn Rose Zipse.
Ph.D.
Lam, Yat-kin, and 林日堅. "Intelligent lexical access based on Chinese/English text queries." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2005. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B30445474.
Full textBooks on the topic "Lexical access"
Levelt, W. J. M. 1938-, ed. Lexical access in speech production. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993.
Find full textFera, Paul Alexander. Lexical access without frequency effects: Evidence from word naming. Sudbury, Ont: Laurentian University, Department of Psychology, 1990.
Find full textAlfonso, Caramazza, ed. Access of phonological and orthographic lexical forms: Evidence from dissociations in reading and spelling. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press, 1997.
Find full textJongenburger, Wilhelmina. The role of lexical stress during spoken-word processing. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 1996.
Find full textWetterlin, Allison. Tonal accents in Norwegian: Phonology, morphology and lexical specification. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010.
Find full textCoetsem, Frans van. Towards a typology of lexical accent: Stress accent and pitch accent in a renewed perspective. Heidelberg: Winter, 1996.
Find full textHeadmost accent wins: Head dominance and ideal prosodic form in lexical accent systems. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 1999.
Find full textLexical, pragmatic, and positional effects of prosody in two dialects of Croatian and Serbian: An acoustic study. New York: Routledge, 2004.
Find full textBasciano, Bianca, Franco Gatti, and Anna Morbiato. Corpus-Based Research on Chinese Language and Linguistics. Venice: Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-406-6.
Full textMorphological structure, lexical representation, and lexical access. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Lexical access"
Levelt, Willem J. M., and Herbert Schriefers. "Stages of Lexical Access." In Natural Language Generation, 395–404. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3645-4_25.
Full textCorson, David. "Difficulty in Lexical Access: The Lexical Bar." In Using English Words, 171–84. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0425-8_9.
Full textLevelt, Willem J. M. "Lexical Access in Speech Production." In Knowledge and Language, 241–51. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1840-8_11.
Full textGiora, Rachel, and Noga Balaban. "Lexical access in text production." In Human Cognitive Processing, 111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.06gio.
Full textBasnight-Brown, Dana M. "Models of Lexical Access and Bilingualism." In Foundations of Bilingual Memory, 85–107. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9218-4_5.
Full textSimpson, Greg B., and George Kellas. "Dynamic Contextual Processes and Lexical Access." In Cognitive Science, 40–56. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3596-5_4.
Full textMorris, Robin K. "Sentence Context Effects on Lexical Access." In Springer Series in Neuropsychology, 317–32. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2852-3_19.
Full textDeutsch, Avital, and Ram Frost. "9. Lexical organization and lexical access in a non-concatenated morphology." In Language Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-Based, Morphology, 165–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lald.28.09deu.
Full textDarcy, Isabelle, Danielle Daidone, and Chisato Kojima. "Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners." In Benjamins Current Topics, 119–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/bct.80.06dar.
Full textThomas, Ian, Ingrid Zukerman, Jonathan Oliver, and Bhavani Raskutti. "Lexical access using minimum message length encoding." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 229–40. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61532-6_20.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Lexical access"
Lacouture, Roxane, and Yves Normandin. "Efficient lexical access strategies." In 3rd European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1993). ISCA: ISCA, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/eurospeech.1993-344.
Full textMcQueen, James M., and Anne Cutler. "Words within words: lexical statistics and lexical access." In 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1992). ISCA: ISCA, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/icslp.1992-49.
Full textKim, Jonny, and Katie Drager. "Sociophonetic Realizations Guide Subsequent Lexical Access." In Interspeech 2017. ISCA: ISCA, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2017-1742.
Full textMoates, Danny R., Zinny S. Bond, Russell Fox, and Verna Stockmal. "The feature [sonorant] in lexical access." In Interspeech 2005. ISCA: ISCA, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2005-758.
Full textZock, Michael, and Didier Schwab. "Lexical access based on underspecified input." In the workshop. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1598848.1598851.
Full textStevens, Kenneth N. "Applying phonetic knowledge to lexical access." In 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1995). ISCA: ISCA, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/eurospeech.1995-1.
Full textBriscoe, Ted. "Lexical access in connected speech recognition." In the 27th annual meeting. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/981623.981634.
Full textNix, Andrew, Gareth Gaskell, and William Marslen-Wilson. "Phonological variation and mismatch in lexical access." In 3rd European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1993). ISCA: ISCA, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/eurospeech.1993-166.
Full textLeung, Roger Ho-Yin, and Hong C. Leung. "Lexical access for large-vocabulary speech recognition." In 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998). ISCA: ISCA, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/icslp.1998-760.
Full textRussell, N. H., Frank Fallside, and R. W. Prager. "Non-linear time compression for lexical access." In 3rd European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1993). ISCA: ISCA, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/eurospeech.1993-363.
Full textReports on the topic "Lexical access"
Terauchi, Tachio, Alex Aiken, and Jeffrey S. Foster. Types for Lexically-Scoped Access Control. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada603323.
Full textBuitrago-García, Hilda Clarena. Teaching Dictionary Skills through Online Bilingual Dictionaries. Ediciones Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.16925/gcnc.23.
Full textAl-Kaddo, Hajar, and Sarah Rosenberg-Jansen. Definitions and Differences: The Evolving Space of Energy Access in Humanitarian Energy. Coventry University, June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18552/heed/2021/0003.
Full text