Academic literature on the topic 'Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, 1870-1924'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, 1870-1924.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, 1870-1924"
Khomyakov, Sergey V. "From “Dear Ilyich” to the covenants of the leader: transformation of perception of the personality of Vladimir Lenin in the rural province in the 1920s (Buryat-Mongol Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic)." Vestnik of Kostroma State University 26, no. 4 (January 28, 2021): 22–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2020-26-4-22-27.
Full textRibeiro Junior, José Arnaldo Dos Santos. "ALGUMAS INFLUÊNCIAS TEÓRICAS DETERMINANTES DO CONCEITO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO EM JOSUÉ DE CASTRO: UM PRELÚDIO." Revista Tamoios 16, no. 2 (July 3, 2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/tamoios.2020.43717.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, 1870-1924"
Lazagna, Angela 1978. "Lenin, as forças produtivas e o taylorismo." [s.n.], 2002. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/278923.
Full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-02T06:52:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Lazagna_Angela_M.pdf: 8084348 bytes, checksum: 94247354752ae11264b01df9f0ff4cf0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2002
Resumo: Esta dissertação é um estudo sobre o lugar privilegiado que o primado do desenvolvimento das forças produtivas ocupa no pensamento de Lenin. A partir daí, podemos entender qual é o conceito leniniano de socialismo, para compreendermos porque o taylorismo - um modo de organização do trabalho criado no início do século XX com o objetivo de intensificar o processo de extração da maisvalia relativa através da expropriação do saber-fazer operário, expropriação esta decorrente do aprofundamento da separação entre trabalho manual e intelectual, de concepção e de execução - teve lugar privilegiado no pensamento leniniano como um fator de desenvolvimento das forças produtivas para a superação do capitalismo e transição ao comunismo. Também demonstraremos como se deu o debate na década de 1920 na U.R.S.S. acerca da possibilidade da criação de um "taylorismo soviético"
Abstract: This dissertation is a study about the privileged place that the primacy of the productive forces development takes in Lenin's thought. Starting from that, we can apprehend thé true nature of leninian concept of socialism, to understand why the taylorism - a method of labor organization created in the beginning of XX century aiming at the intensification of the extraction of the relative surplus through the expropriation of the know-how from the workers, this same expropriation being bom from the deepenning of the splitting between manual and intelectual labour, of conception and execution - had its unique spot in Lenin's ideas as a development's agent of productive forces for the surpassment of capitalism and subsequent transition to communism. Also how unfolded the 1920's U.S.S.R. debate toward the possibility of creation of a "sovietic taylorism"
Mestrado
Mestre em Sociologia
Cardoso, Felipe Guilherme Gava. "Divisão do trabalho partidario : organização em Lenin." [s.n.], 2007. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/278925.
Full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-08T03:15:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cardoso_FelipeGuilhermeGava_M.pdf: 1095773 bytes, checksum: 58f762a98eb6d76ff699f9c9b75c0b1e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007
Resumo: A pesquisa aborda a questão do partido em Lenin ao longo de toda sua produção teórica (1895-1923) e tem como proposta discorrer detidamente sobre a organização interna, levandoem consideração a relação entre base e direção e partido e classe trabalhadora. Para tanto, analisa-se o conjunto da obra teórica de Lenin, as principais polêmicas a respeito do tema (como as discussões com Rosa Luxemburg e Trotski) e o acervo crítico oferecido por autores como MareeI Liebman, Neil Harding, Toni Cliff, Rudi Dutschke, Robert Michels, entre outros. O ponto central de discussão diz respeito ao predomínio, em Lenin, do princípio de especialização e do perfil militarizado das relações intra-partidárias, cujo fundamento remete à cisão entre direção política (Comitê Central) e execução de tarefas (base de militantes). Esse fator é especialmente problemático no período de transição ao comunismo, quando esse modelo organizativo se toma um empecilho para o desmantelamento das relações de produção de tipo capitalista já que repõe estratificações sociais de tipo c1assista
Abstract: The research discuss the party issue in Lenin along his complete theoretical production (1895-1923), speciaIIyabout the internal organizationquestion, considering the relationship between militants and directive organs as weIl as party and working class. In order to investigate this subject, we use as a source the complete works of Lenin, the main discussions with Rosa Luxemburg and Leon Trotski and the theoretical contributions of Marcel Liebman, Neil Harding, Toni Cliff, Rudi Dutschke, Robert Michels and others. The main discussion is about the dominance of the principIe of division of labour and the militaryway of internal rganization in Lenin's thougbt, which is founded on the separation between polítical direction (Central Committee) and accomplishment of tasks (by the rest of militants). This is particularly critical during the communist transition, because this organizationalpattern is an obstac1eto the overcomingof the capitalist social relations
Mestrado
Mestre em Sociologia
Silva, Rafael Afonso da 1979. "Dilemas da transição : um estudo critico da obra de Lenin de 1917-1923." [s.n.], 2007. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/278924.
Full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-08T04:43:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Silva_RafaelAfonsoda_M.pdf: 804324 bytes, checksum: 11865378ae1d651ceffb133f797845d6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007
Resumo: Esta pesquisa tem como propósito a análise e a reconstrução da reflexão de Lenin sobre a transição socialista em sua obra de 1917-1923, expondo criticamente seus dilemas e limitações. A reflexão leniniana é examinada por períodos, procurando apreender o seu discurso, na efetividade de sua entificação peculiar, em sua relação significativa com as necessidades práticas com que Lenin se defronta na dialética real da tentativa de iniciar um processo de transformação socialista das relações sociais na Rússia. Este estudo pretende, em primeiro lugar, contribuir para a compreensão da obra de Lenin. Em segundo lugar, tem por objetivo contribuir para o debate do tema da transição ao comunismo em uma perspectiva marxista. Espera-se que este trabalho possa servir para reforçar a relevância de tratar o tema da transição ao comunismo, fazendo um balanço das experiências e tentativas históricas de transição do século XX
Abstract: This research has as purpose to analyze and reconstruct Lenin¿s reflexion about the socialist revolution in his work from 1917-1923, explaining critically his dilemmas and limitations. Lenin¿s reflexion is divided into periods, in order to grasp his discourse in the effectiveness of its peculiar ontology and in its significant relation with the practical necessities, with which Lenin is confronted in the real dialectic of the attempt at beginning a process of socialist transformation of Russian social relations. This study intends firstly to contribute to the understanding of Lenin¿s work. Secondly it aims at discussing the subject of transition to communism from a marxist perspective. We hope this work serves to reinforce the relevance of dealing with the subject of transition to communism, taking a stock of the historical experiences and essays of transition in the 20th century
Mestrado
Mestre em Sociologia
Manie, Abdelhamid. "Lénine et la théorie marxiste de l'Etat." Aix-Marseille 1, 1993. http://www.theses.fr/1993AIX10072.
Full textDo the communism have died and the marxism fighted ever where can one again speak of a marxist theory of the state ? this work tries to land this problem in studying the concepts of the state and of the dictatorship of proletariat ; since the reflection of marx and of engels to this subject, until the stak in work of these reflection by lenine in the setting of the bolchevik revolution he pursues the evolution of this revolution in order to see to wich point has she embedded the principles of marxism, and wich sense has she complant summer to theoretical elaborations of lenine, particulary in its work the state and the revolution. A big interest there is carried on the analyses and the done critiques by some occidental intellectuals on the marxist theory of the state, and particulary on their innovations in this domain
Crowch, Dennis. "Lénine et l'actualité de la révolution : la traduction pratique du projet révolutionnaire." Besançon, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010BESA1016.
Full textLenin was the first to go as far as he did in the definition of what could be the practical means and conditions of a revolutionary transition toward socialism, defining it precisely in terms of practices, institutions and economic policy. Lenin affirms that, revolution becoming a question of actuality, it is necessary for socialism to go from a general and abstract perspective to a practical problem. He tried to show that capitalist development, with imperialism and war, created institutions that permitted a centralised control of an economy that was becoming more and more socialised. Socialist transition would start with a revolutionary takeover of these institutions that would permit to resolve the contradiction between private property and social production. For Lenin, hierarchical management was not a practical base for class relations but a technical necessity, so he thought it possible and necessary to use capitalist structure, once it is state controlled, for preparing the conditions of socialism. We think the main weakness of Lenin’s project was that it did not integrate a critique of political economy showing the necessity to oppose to capital a free association of producers that realises a democratic mode of direction. That’s why leninist political practice gave way to a statist transformation of capital and not to its destruction. Charged to direct a mode of production that remained antagonistic the bolshevik power soon became independent from the workers and realised by a specialised political apparatus. The politics of transition to socialism through state capitalism leads to a dictatorship that can’t realise workers emancipation but imposes the necessity of an industrialisation that reproduces separation between the producers and the means of production and also the orientation of production towards accumulation. We try to show how the results of Lenin’s conceptions relates to the limits of political action when it is not going hand in hand with the abolition of the class relations bases in production and especially of a hierarchical direction that realises capital impersonation in a ruling class. We conclude that a communist transition must replace a mode of cooperation directed by capital by one directed workers associating together, and resulting from their revolutionary self-activity. It must be based on practices of association developed without the mediation of capital or of the state and directed towards their replacement. It must be carried by a social revolution realising the hegemony of an acting and creative democracy of producers, imposing against capital, relations of a new and higher quality that men and women would implement between themselves and with nature, giving rise to an enrichment that would be the enrichment of human faculties
Rodrigues, Jefferson Vasques 1977. "A práxis educativa entre direção e base no partido revolucionário = uma análise a partir de Gramsci." [s.n.], 2011. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/251094.
Full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-19T14:11:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rodrigues_JeffersonVasques_M.pdf: 1000150 bytes, checksum: 7304092c9acdec8d1221ac284e53fd94 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011
Resumo: Partindo da compreensão de que, por determinações materiais e históricas, a direção partidária se apresenta como pólo teórico no papel de educador-dirigente, e a base partidária, como pólo prático no papel de educando-dirigido, busco analisar as características dessa relação dentro da estrutura organizativa do partido revolucionário (proposto originalmente por Lênin) e, conseqüentemente, a importância da práxis educativa nessa relação-eixo (dirigente-dirigido) para o processo revolucionário como um todo. Interessa avaliar as possibilidades de uma práxis educativa emancipadora entre esses dois sujeitos, em que se desenvolva a autonomia dos educandos (base/classe) e se garanta a educação do próprio educador (direção/partido). Para tanto, realizo uma pesquisa bibliográfica através do instrumental conceitual de Antonio Gramsci, abordando, no primeiro capítulo, a presença da práxis educativa no processo revolucionário como um todo; no segundo capítulo, o partido revolucionário como educador coletivo; e, no terceiro capítulo, o objeto desta pesquisa, a práxis educativa entre direção e base em seu interior. Por fim, avalio, de forma preliminar, o partido revolucionário e sua práxis educativa no Brasil atual. Ao final deste estudo, concluo pela vigência e validade dos princípios organizativos e educativos do partido revolucionário, apesar da conjuntura de crise que assola as organizações da classe. Também reafirmo a importância fundamental da práxis educativa entre direção e base, que pode potencializar, através da unidade dinâmica entre teoria e prática, o processo revolucionário, ou pô-lo em risco, se apresenta deformações que separam de forma estanque dirigentes (polo teórico) e dirigidos (pólo prático).
Abstract: Based on the understanding that, for historical and material determinations, the party leadership is presented as a theoretical pole in the role of educator-leader, and the party base, as a practical pole in the role of learner-followers, I analyze the characteristics of this relationship within the framework organization of the revolutionary party (originally proposed by Lenin) and, consequently, the importance of educational praxis that this relationship-axis (leader-follower) to the revolutionary process as a whole. I want to evaluate the possibilities of an emancipator educational practice between these two subjects able to develop the autonomy of learners (base/class) and ensuring the education of the educator himself (leadership/party). For this purpose, I make a bibliographic survey through the conceptual instruments of Antonio Gramsci, covering in the first chapter, the presence of educational practice in the revolutionary process as a whole; the revolutionary party as a collective educator in the second chapter and, the object of this research, the educational praxis between leadership and base in the third chapter. Finally, I evaluate, on a preliminary basis, the revolutionary party and its educational praxis in Brazil nowadays. At the end of the study, I conclude the actuality and validity of educational and organizational principles of the revolutionary party, despite the context of crisis affecting class organizations. I also reaffirm the fundamental importance of the educational praxis between leadership and base, which can enhance, through the dynamic unity of theory and practice, the revolutionary process, or put it at risk if deformations separate and isolate leaders (theoretical pole) and followers (practical pole).
Mestrado
Filosofia e História da Educação
Mestre em Educação
Fuentes, Salvo Mauricio. "Crítica de El estado y la revolución de Lenin a través de la lectura de los escritos de juventud de Marx." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2012. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/111358.
Full textTesis autorizada con embargo, disponible en texto competo en 2013
Tesis para optar al grado de Magíster en Filosofía mención Axiología y Filosofía Política
El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo general demostrar la falta de comprensión por parte de Lenin del fenómeno moderno de la separación (enajenación) de lo político (Estado político) con respecto a lo social, que tendría como consecuencias teóricas concretas la imposibilidad, de comprender el proceso de burocratización del “Estado Soviético”, y de plantear teóricamente la temática de la extinción del Estado. Para realizar lo anterior se justifica la importancia atribuida a los textos de Marx escritos en los años 1843 y 1844 (“Crítica de la Filosofía del Derecho de Hegel” en adelante “La Crítica”, “La cuestión judía”, “Para una crítica de la Filosofía del Derecho de Hegel. Introducción” y “Glosas críticas al artículo „El rey de Prusia y la reforma social. Por un prusiano”). No serán analizados ni los llamados “Manuscritos económico-filosóficos”, ni tampoco, los escritos de Marx posteriores a 1844. Solamente nos referiremos a estos últimos para mostrar: (1) la permanencia de conceptos como, por ejemplo, el de alienación/enajenación en los escritos llamados de madurez; y, (2) en qué medida las experiencias reales del movimiento obrero influyeron en el devenir intelectual del revolucionario alemán. Luego, se expone la teoría leninista del Estado que podemos encontrar en su texto “El Estado y la Revolución”. Se concluye que: (1) existen diferencias importantes en las diversas interpretaciones de los escritos llamados de juventud; tanto desde un punto de vista “epistemológico”, como de un punto de vista “político”; (2) Leninconfundióel fenómeno del Estado moderno con el hecho de que el pueblo se encontrase separado e imposibilitado de participar de las funciones estatales, pudiendo ser así oprimido por la clase dominante mediante el poder del Estado; (3) con respecto al problema de las formas políticas que permitirían la extinción de todo Estado, Lenin no encontraría una solución satisfactoria. Finalmente se deja abierta la siguiente pregunta: ¿no cabría preguntarse acaso, si la posibilidad de una crítica de “la filosofía política”, y por lo tanto de la posibilidad de una teoría del Estado, debería partir de la crítica de “la economía política”?
Radonjic, Tatjana. "Marxisme et théorie de la connaissance : le travail de Marx, Engels et Lénine." Paris 10, 1987. http://www.theses.fr/1987PA100047.
Full textThis work traces the formation of a Marxist theory of knowledge through the works of Marx, Engels and Lenin. One of its principal themes is the comparison between the materialist theory of knowledge and the traditional epistemology (Kant, Hegel, the empiriciss). The first chapter ("first signs: idealism and materialism") analyses the work of young Marx - his critique of Hegel’s objective idealism and Feuerbach’s subjective materialism. In the second chapter we explain the specificity of the materialist dialectical method of Marx through its differences with that of Hegel (the text of the introduction of 1857 to the contribution), the dialectics of form in the capital which represents its contribution to epistemology, and the dialectic of Engels. Together these ideas clarify the fundamental and unsurmountable differences between Marxism and empiricism. A theory that has dominated the philosophy of science since the 18th century. Hence the title of the chapter: "materialism and empiricism". We conclude this work with an analysis of Lenin’s philosophical works ("gnoseology of reflection"). In its scientific and political context. By means of his work on the theory of knowledge Lenin creates a theoretical support for Marxism as well as a new way of philosophizing. In that last chapter, then, we witness a constitution of a theory of knowledge that is Marxist and materialist. Known under the name of the theory of reflection it allows us to understand historical materialism and dialectical materialism as a whole, and also to criticize all concepts from a materialist point of view, hence it permits Marxism to assimilate all materialist elements originating in any domain of knowledge. In order to accomplish its critical function Marxism necessitates a theory of knowledge
Padilha, Tânia Mara de Almeida [UNESP]. "Entre o semear e a próxima colheita: uma análise dos escritos de Lenin sobre a questão agrário-camponesa." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/88739.
Full textO objetivo geral deste trabalho é acompanhar a reflexão desse autor sobre a questão agráriocamponesa, através da análise dos escritos mais importantes de Lenin sobre o tema, entre os anos de 1893 e 1923. Esse recorte se justifica por encampar todo o período de escritos do autor. Enquanto os marxistas do Ocidente atuavam no seio do movimento operário, Lenin operava no quadro particular da hegemonia ideológica do eslavismo narodinik – populismo russo. Para os populistas o capitalismo era um processo artificial na Rússia e o povo russo encontraria sua redenção através da comuna agrária, considerada pelos narodiniks a essência desse povo. Lenin está claramente posto no campo marxista ao entender a necessidade de desenvolvimento das forças produtivas e, no que diz respeito à revolução, a única classe radicalmente revolucionária seria o operariado. No entanto, sua teoria teve influências dos narodiniks, que acreditavam ser o camponês a única classe revolucionária. É nesse contexto que buscamos entender os meandros em que se forjou a produção teórico-política de Lenin, contemplando sua análise do capitalismo na Rússia e seus desdobramentos; da formação econômico-social específica da Rússia; da revolução burguesa, com a participação dos trabalhadores do campo; do papel do campesinato russo nas transformações sociais; do campesinato no contexto de uma revolução socialista internacional; do campesinato como base social essencial do novo Estado que se originou da Revolução de 1917; e, finalmente, o significado da aliança operário-camponesa.
The general purpose of this work is to follow the discussion about the agrarian-peasant question, by analyzing the most important writings of Lenin on the subject, between the years 1893 and 1923. This cut is justified due to encamp the whole period of the author's writings. While the Western Marxists working within the movement, Lenin worked in specific context of ideological hegemony of the Slav narodinik - Russian populism. The populists believed that capitalism was an artificial process in Russia, therefore, Russian people find their redemption through the agrarian community, deemed by narodiniks the essence of people. Lenin is clearly inserted in the Marxist view of the need for development of productive forces and, regarding the revolution, the only revolutionary class would be radically workforces. However, his theory had narodiniks influences, who believed the peasantry was the only revolutionary class. In this context we seek to understand the intricacies that were forged Lenin’s political-theory production, including his analysis of capitalism in Russia and its developments, the economic and social specific training in Russia, the bourgeois revolution, with the participation of employees in field, the role of the Russian peasantry in the social transformations, the peasantry in the context of an international socialist revolution, the peasantry as a social basis essential that the new state led the Revolution of 1917, and finally, the meaning of the worker-peasant alliance.
Colceru-Mihul, Emilian. "Eléments du discours communiste : représentations de Lénine dans les textes publiés par les partis communistes français et roumain." Thesis, Paris 10, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA100220/document.
Full textThis thesis intends to identify the references and the interpretation that the authors form the French and Communist parties have given to the historical character Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) between 1920 (the year of creation of the FCP) and 1989 (the year of dissolution of the RCP). The goal of this research was to observe the general manner in which these references determine the essence or the evolution of the two parties and the political frame created by the interpretations. Two distinct dimensions of the research were considered: the theoretical analysis of written document, which determines the impact made by the personality and the thinking of Lenin to the political program of the two parties; the analysis of the evolution of the two parties, of their political structures and the social systems they determine to finally see how the discourse is put into practice.The thesis is divided into five great chapters. The first one, Theory and practice: Leninism of the two parties, which has also a role of introduction, analyses the evolution of the two parties and their attachment to Leninism as a guide in their action. The second chapter, Soviet model and its application shows the manner in which the two parties have copied the construction applied in the Soviet Union. The third and the fourth chapter deal with the Political representations in Romania and France. There are two types of discourse that mention Lenin: the institutional discourse (present in the Party Congress or the plenary sessions of the Central Committee) and the ideological discourse (propagated through the speeches of the party leaders, the propaganda publications, the party press or the theoretical articles). The fifth chapter discusses Specific interpretations, published rather as individuals, in a scientific manner
Books on the topic "Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, 1870-1924"
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin. Chicago: Heinemann Library, 2002.
Find full textVladimir Ilich Lenin. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1988.
Find full text1908-, Schapiro Leonard Bertram, Reddaway Peter, and Rosta Paul, eds. Lenin: The man, the theorist, the leader : a reappraisal. Boulder: Westview, 1987.
Find full textauthor, Edwards Judith 1940, ed. Vladimir Lenin and the Russian Revolution. New York, NY: Enslow Publishing, 2016.
Find full textLenin. London: B. Batsford, 1988.
Find full textSheehan, Sean. Lenin. London: Haus Pub., 2010.
Find full textPannekoek, Anton. Lenin as philosopher: A critical examination of the philosophical basis of Leninism. Milwaukee, Wis: Marquette University Press, 2003.
Find full textBeryl, Williams. Lenin. Harlow, England: Longman, 2000.
Find full textBeryl, Williams. Lenin. Harlow, Eng: Longman, 2000.
Find full textBeryl, Williams. Lenin. Harlow, England: Longman, 1999.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, 1870-1924"
Desai, Meghnad. "Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich [Ulyanov] (1870–1924)." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 1–3. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1081-1.
Full textDesai, Meghnad. "Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich [Ulyanov] (1870–1924)." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 1–3. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1081-2.
Full textDesai, Meghnad. "Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich [Ulyanov] (1870–1924)." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 7776–78. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1081.
Full textCeplair, Larry. "Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870–1924) and Lev Davidovich Trotsky (1879–1940)." In Revolutionary Pairs, 49–97. University Press of Kentucky, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813179193.003.0003.
Full text"Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870–1924) and Lev Davidovich Trotsky (1879–1940)." In Revolutionary Pairs, 49–97. The University Press of Kentucky, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10h9dnf.5.
Full textLih, Lars T. "Vladimir Ilich Lenin (1870–1924)." In Routledge Handbook of Marxism and Post-Marxism, 176–83. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315149608-20.
Full text"Lenin, Vladimir (1870–1924) and Education." In Encyclopaedia of Marxism and Education, 355–72. BRILL, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004505612_022.
Full textMUTIS, DIEGO JARAMILLO. "Vladimir Ilich Uliánov – Lenin (Rusia, 1870-1924)." In Manual de Historia de las ideas políticas, Tomo III, 113–28. Universidad del Externado de Colombia, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1k03nz1.7.
Full text"Vladimir I. Lenin (1870–1924) and Simone Weil (1909–43)." In Religion and Political Thought. The Continuum International Publishing Group, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350934016.ch-014.
Full text