Books on the topic 'Legitimaly'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Legitimaly.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Legitimaly.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Pardo, Italo, and Giuliana B. Prato, eds. Legitimacy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96238-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ellis, Justin R. Policing Legitimacy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73519-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Petkova, Iva. Engineering Legitimacy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90707-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Díez-De-Castro, Emilio, and Marta Peris-Ortiz, eds. Organizational Legitimacy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Larsen, Håkon. Performing Legitimacy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31047-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kihlström, Anita. Communicative Legitimacy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54949-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Democratic legitimacy. New York: Routledge, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rothstein, Benjamin. Legitimate. [San Diego?: B. Rothstein, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kahn, Paul W. Legitimacy and history. New Hawen; London: Yale uniwersity press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Law and legitimacy. Copenhagen, Denmark: DJØF Publishing, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Kirkpatrick, Jeane J. Legitimacy and force. New Brunswick, U.S.A: Transaction Books, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Equality and legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

van, Dijk Hans, and Janson Liesbeth, eds. Architecture and-- legitimacy. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Jeffrey, Seitzer, ed. Legality and legitimacy. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

1951-, Bigelow Barbara Jane, ed. Unions and legitimacy. Ithaca: ILR Press, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Operation save legitimacy. [Harare]: Enias Elias Mavhene, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Legitimacy and force. New Brunswick, U.S.A: Transaction Books, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Kirkpatrick, Jeane J. Legitimacy and force. New Brunswick, U.S.A: Transaction Books, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Miyaoka, Isao. Legitimacy in International Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403948199.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Kane, John, Hui-Chieh Loy, and Haig Patapan, eds. Political Legitimacy in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137001474.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Van Rooy, Alison. The Global Legitimacy Game. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230000957.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Suksamran, Somboon. Buddhism and political legitimacy. Bangkok, Thailand: Research Dissemination Project, Research Affairs, Chulalongkorn University, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Netelenbos, Benno. Political Legitimacy beyond Weber. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55112-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

White, Lynn. Legitimacy. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/5698.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Sadurski, Wojciech, Michael Sevel, and Kevin Walton, eds. Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198825265.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
This collection brings together scholars of jurisprudence and political theory to probe the question of ‘legitimacy’. It offers discussions that interrogate the nature of legitimacy, how legitimacy is intertwined with notions of statehood, and how legitimacy reaches beyond the state into supranational institutions and international law. Chapter I considers benefit-based, merit-based, and will-based theories of state legitimacy. Chapter II examines the relationship between expertise and legitimate political authority. Chapter III attempts to make sense of John Rawls’s account of legitimacy in his later work. Chapter IV observes that state sovereignty persists, since no alternative is available, and that the success of the assortment of international organizations that challenge state sovereignty depends on their ability to attract loyalty. Chapter V argues that, to be complete, an account of a state’s legitimacy must evaluate not only its powers and its institutions, but also its officials. Chapter VI covers the rule of law and state legitimacy. Chapter VII considers the legitimation of the nation state in a post-national world. Chapter VIII contends that legitimacy beyond the state should be understood as a subject-conferred attribute of specific norms that generates no more than a duty to respect those norms. Chapter IX is a reply to critics of attempts to ground the legitimacy of suprastate institutions in constitutionalism. Chapter X examines Joseph Raz’s perfectionist liberalism. Chapter XI attempts to bring some order to debates about the legitimacy of international courts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Buchanan, Allen. Institutional Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813972.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter offers a general theory of institutional legitimacy, the Metacoordination view, according to which legitimacy assessments are best understood as being part of a social practice aimed at achieving consensus on whether an institution is worthy of our moral reason-based support—support not dependent solely on the fear of coercion or on a perfect fit between our own interests and what the institution demands of us. The Metacoordination view’s account of the practical function of legitimacy assessments is used to identify criteria of legitimacy that apply to a wide range of institutions and to show that, for institutions that back their rules with coercion, conformity to the requirements of the rule of law is a presumptive necessary condition of legitimacy. The Metacoordination view is shown to be superior to consent theories of legitimacy and attempts to use Raz’s “service” conception of authority as an account of institutional legitimacy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Moulakis, Athanasios, ed. Legitimacy / Légitimité. De Gruyter, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110872446.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Barnes Jr, Rudolph C. Military Legitimacy. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203044032.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Knight, Jack, and Melissa Schwartzberg, eds. Political Legitimacy. NYU Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479888696.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
In Political Legitimacy, a distinguished interdisciplinary group of scholars in political science, law, and philosophy examine one of the most challenging and important concepts in contemporary politics: legitimacy. The twelve essays in this volume, the latest installment in the NOMOS series, take up fundamental philosophical questions about the appropriate scope and domain of legitimacy and the justified exercise of political power, as well as empirical questions about the structure of citizens’ beliefs about compliance and justice. The essays also speak to urgent concerns for contemporary politics, including whether “animus” should matter for the legitimacy of political decisions and the range of institutions (international institutions, labor unions, and so forth) for which legitimacy is relevant. The volume is in three parts. The first third addresses basic questions of the legitimacy of the state and its regime, drawing on competing traditions in the history of political thought (Kant, Hobbes, and Aristotle). The second takes up the reasons according to which institutional authority may be exercised. The final part turns to the empirical study of legitimacy and compliance, and to the relationship between what the authors describe as moral or normative accounts of legitimacy and sociological or descriptive legitimacy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Alfonso Antón, Isabel, Hugh Kennedy, and Julio Escalona Monge, eds. Building Legitimacy. BRILL, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789047402688.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Tankebe, Justice. Police Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199843886.013.017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Buchanan, Allen. Institutional Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190878436.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Given the importance of institutions for the morality of war-making, a sound just war theory must rely on theory as to what makes institutions legitimate and an understanding of the distinctive practical role of the concept of legitimacy. This chapter provides both by developing the “Metacoordination” view of institutional legitimacy. This theory of legitimacy is designed to apply to individual states and to multilateral institutions; it also seeks to explain how the legitimacy of states can be enhanced by their participation in multilateral institutions and how the legitimacy of multilateral institutions can depend on the character of the participating states.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

LaFree, Gary. Losing Legitimacy. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429499135.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Peter, Fabienne. Democratic Legitimacy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Rasmussen, Terje. Political Legitimacy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Peter, Fabienne. Democratic Legitimacy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Peter, Fabienne. Democratic Legitimacy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Peter, Fabienne. Democratic Legitimacy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Political Legitimacy. New York University Press, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Peter, Fabienne. Democratic Legitimacy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Rasmussen, Terje. Political Legitimacy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Stemplowska, Zofia, and Adam Swift. Dethroning Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813972.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The chapter considers the contributions made by democratic legitimacy and social justice to the question of what may permissibly be enforced. According to the conventional view, democratic decisions forfeit their claim to permissible enforceability only when they are gravely unjust. That view is rejected here as unduly restrictive, with a “balancing” view proposed instead, according to which the two considerations need to be balanced on a case-by-case basis. Both the provenance and the content of decisions yield pro tanto reasons: which determines the permissibility of enforcement depends on whether we have greater reason in any given case to advance legitimacy or justice. A democratically legitimate law or policy need not be gravely unjust for it to be wrong to enforce it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Schmitt, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy. Translated by Jeffrey Seitzer. Duke University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822385769.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Andeweg, Rudy B., and Kees Aarts. Studying Political Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793717.003.0011.

Full text
Abstract:
This final chapter concludes with a reflection on the findings presented in the book, the implications of these findings for politics and political science, and suggestions for a new research agenda on legitimacy. The chapter concludes that the analyses in this volume do not provide evidence of legitimacy crisis. This leaves us with a puzzle, as the belief in such a legitimacy crisis is persistent, and it has proven to be quite resistant to evidence provided by political scientists on the basis of data such as analyzed in this book. This discrepancy between current data and public discourse must also prompt us to reflect on political science research: what have we done so far in selecting our concepts, data, research strategies, and empirical domain, and what can and should be improved? The chapter concludes with suggestions for new research on legitimacy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Stout, Margaret. Logics of Legitimacy. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315091662.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Ruiz Fabri, Hélène, André Nunes Chaib, Ingo Venzke, and Armin von Bogdandy, eds. International Judicial Legitimacy. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748908661.

Full text
Abstract:
These texts on the legitimacy of international courts were framed as a direct reaction to arguments put forward in the book “In Whose Name?” by Armin von Bogdandy und Ingo Venzke. The subjects ranged from a comparison between international organizations and international courts and how they can contribute to democratize international law to assessing the democratic legitimacy of international human rights courts. Therefore the collection is dealing with both theoretical and practical questions regarding the legitimacy of international courts and how such problems relate to fundamental problems of our times.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Duyvesteyn, Isabelle, ed. Rebels and Legitimacy. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429467271.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Sommerer, Thomas, Hans Agné, Fariborz Zelli, and Bart Bes. Global Legitimacy Crises. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192856326.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This book addresses the consequences of legitimacy in global governance, in particular asking: when and how do legitimacy crises affect international organizations (IOs) and their capacity to rule. The book starts with a new conceptualization of legitimacy crisis that looks at public challenges from a variety of actors. Based on this conceptualization, it applies a mixed-methods approach to identify and examine legitimacy crises, starting with a quantitative analysis of mass media data on challenges of a sample of 32 IOs. It shows that some, but not all organizations have experienced legitimacy crises, spread over several decades from 1985 to 2020. Following this, the book presents a qualitative study to further examine legitimacy crises of two selected case studies: the WTO and the UNFCCC. Whereas earlier research assumed that legitimacy crises have negative consequences, the book introduces a theoretical framework that privileges the activation inherent in a legitimacy crisis. It holds that this activation may not only harm an IO, but could also strengthen it, in terms of its material, institutional, and decision-making capacity. The following statistical analysis shows that whether a crisis has predominantly negative or positive effects depends on a variety of factors. These include the specific audience whose challenges define a certain crisis, and several institutional properties of the targeted organization. The ensuing in-depth analysis of the WTO and the UNFCCC further reveals how legitimacy crises and both positive and negative consequences are interlinked, and that effects of crises are sometimes even visible beyond the organizational borders.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Coicaud, Jean-Marc. Legitimacy and Politics. Edited by David Ames Curtis. Cambridge University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511490200.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Banu, Roxana. Legitimacy and Autonomy. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819844.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter provides an analysis of state-centered and individualistic theories of legitimacy in PrIL and distinguishes them from the relational internationalist perspective. It shows that state-centered theories determined the legitimacy of applying one law or another within interstate relationships. Individualistic theories linked the legitimacy of the applicable law to particular dimensions of political affiliation. By contrast, this chapter shows how relational internationalist authors envisioned different dimensions of legitimacy from both the state-centered and the individualistic positions, by focusing on an interpersonal relationship, as opposed to an isolated individual, and on private law, as opposed to constitutional or public law generally. According to the relational internationalist perspective, the legitimacy of imposing one law over another is justified on different grounds, including by reference to the actions of the parties, their expectations, the values underlying private law relationships, and the embeddedness of a legal relationship within one or several communities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography