Academic literature on the topic 'Legality litigation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Legality litigation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Legality litigation":
1
Eliana, Eliana, Aria Dimas Harapan, Reny Suryani, and Sri Endah Indriawati. "The legality of Arable Land Minimizes Disputes." Asian Journal of Social and Humanities 1, no. 11 (August 20, 2023): 907–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i11.107.
Abstract:
Realizing the legality of ownership of arable land can be obtained by the community by carrying out land registration referring to the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs dated February 9, 1999 Number 3 of 1999 concerning Delegation of Authority for Granting and Cancellation of Decisions on State Land Rights continued with the PMNA/Head. BPN Number 4 of 1998 jo. KMNA/Ka.BPN Number 6 of 1998 concerning Guidelines for Determining income in the Granting of State Land Rights. Settlement of disputes over the ownership of arable land in Bogor Regency can be carried out through litigation or outside of litigation and in the case of arable land disputes in Bogor it can be resolved through peace through mediation. It is suggested that the government should schedule counseling on the legality of land ownership to the public so that ordinary people understand the legality process so that the community's economic level is stable and even becomes strong.
2
Lestari, Reski, Wahyu Subakti, and Syed Agung Afandi. "STRATEGI ADVOKASI MELALUI PROSES NONLITIGASI DALAM RANGKA PEMBAHARUAN PROSES PERADILAN DI INDONESIA." JDP (JURNAL DINAMIKA PEMERINTAHAN) 6, no. 1 (January 18, 2023): 31–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.36341/jdp.v6i1.3084.
Abstract:
This study aims to explain the advocacy strategy through the non-litigation process in the context of reforming the judicial process in Indonesia. Mediation in court is an institution and empowerment of peace (court connected mediation) with a philosophical foundation that is Pancasila which is the basis of the Indonesian state, especially the fourth precept "Popularity led by Wisdom of Wisdom in deliberation/representation". In resolving disputes, there are several dispute resolution mechanisms, namely litigation, non-litigation, and advocacy. The method used in this research is literature study, with the type of qualitative descriptive research. The results explain that alternative efforts and strategies for resolving disputes with the Non-Litigation route can achieve a peace in accordance with the wishes of both parties through Mediation, Advocacy and negotiation. In its application there are two types of obstacles in non-litigation efforts to resolve land grabbing disputes, because mediation is not clearly regulated in Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Artibrasion and Alternative Dispute Resolution. And the non-litigation efforts are legally less certain because their legality is also not explicitly regulated in Law no. 30 of 1999.
3
Banjaransari, Ayu Putri Rainah Petung. "Juridical Analysis of Inhibiting Factors in the Implementation of E-Litigation by the Community in the Legal Framework of the Civil Procedure Court." Melayunesia Law 5, no. 2 (December 30, 2021): 231. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v5i2.7830.
Abstract:
E-litigation has begun to be held in civil justice institutions, but peopleare still unfamiliar with the application. Many parties question thelegality of face-to-face trials electronically compared to the legality offace-to-face meetings. In addition, there are factors that hinder theimplementation of the application from the community side. This paperuses a normative legal research method with a legal and conceptualapproach. The finding in this paper is a juridical analysis of theimplementation of e-litigation related to the reasons people are reluctantto use it. This paper also proposes solutions to these causes for therealization of a good e-litigation implementation.
4
Gledhill, Kris. "The Consequences of Acting Unlawfully." International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law 1, no. 10 (September 4, 2014): 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.19164/ijmhcl.v1i10.144.
Abstract:
<p align="LEFT">The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for detention and also for treatment which would otherwise be an assault. As such, it allows for interference with the fundamental rights to liberty and to self-determination. Particularly as it does so in the context of a branch of medicine which is often highly subjective, it is hardly surprising that litigation is occasionally resorted to by those affected who wish to challenge the legality of what is occurring to them.</p><p align="LEFT">The framework for this litigation has developed, spurred on in particular by the growth of public law and human rights law. As a result, mental health professionals have to be familiar not just with the court-machinery which is central to the Mental Health Act 1983 (which provides for the Mental Health Review Tribunal to determine the legality of the ongoing detention of a patient, and refers the issue of the displacement of a nearest relative to the county court) but also with the courts which deal with questions of public law (in particular the Administrative Court) and the civil litigation courts.</p>
5
Gao, Qi, and Sean Whittaker. "Standing to Sue Beyond Individual Rights: Who Should Be Eligible to Bring Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China?" Transnational Environmental Law 8, no. 02 (May 27, 2019): 327–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2047102519000141.
Abstract:
AbstractFormally adopted in 2012, environmental public interest litigation in China has expanded standing beyond individual rights by granting administrative authorities, procuratorates, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) the ability to initiate environmental public interest litigation (PIL). However, the aims of enhancing the enforcement of environmental regulation and the development of the ‘objective legality’ model through civil society have not been met. This is as a result of administrative authorities and procuratorates being granted standing, which inhibits NGOs from initiating their own PIL in line with the aims of the ‘objective legality’ model. In order to promote participation by civil society and its actors in environmental law enforcement, NGOs should be granted preferential standing in environmental PIL. To this end, the current requirements for NGOs to be granted standing should be relaxed, and the standing granted to administrative authorities and procuratorates should be limited or removed.
6
Radovanov, Aleksandar. "Extraordinary legal remedies in litigation de lege ferenda." Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 75, no. 9-10 (2003): 131–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/gakv0304131r.
Abstract:
The author in his work presents current solutions in the Legal Proceedings Law pertaining to the issue of extraordinary legal remedies. He points out the weaknesses and obsoleteness of certain legal solutions and renders concrete proposals to amend these provisions, all with the goal of faster and more efficient case solving in legal proceedings. Inspection and repeat procedures should undergo considerable changes, and request to protect legality submitted by the state i.e. public attorney should be completely omitted as remnant of the past.
7
Xiao, Shiling. "State-centric proportionality analysis in Chinese administrative litigation." International Journal of Constitutional Law 21, no. 2 (April 1, 2023): 461–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad051.
Abstract:
Abstract This article examines the application of proportionality in Chinese administrative litigation over the last two decades and argues that courts in administrative litigation that serve the party-state and tend to uphold state/collective interest have altered proportionality to be state-centric. It finds that the courts invoked proportionality in a negligible portion of all administrative litigation judgments and had inadequate emphases on protecting individual rights. Proportionality has not appreciably assisted the courts in enhancing their oversight of governmental power and protection of individual rights. This article suggests that this is attributable to the restricted function of administrative litigation in China’s party-state governance structure and owing to the country’s long-held belief that public interest takes precedence over individual rights. Administrative litigation, which China’s ruling party employs to resolve principal–agent issues, is seriously constrained. The courts are expected to review the formal legality of executive actions, but not their substance. Informed by the Chinese human rights belief, which favors collectivism over individualism, the courts are skewed toward public interest in the balancing analysis when applying proportionality.
8
Safstrom, Jennifer. "Thirteenth Amendment Litigation in the Immigration Detention Context." Michigan Journal of Race & Law, no. 26.1 (2020): 205. http://dx.doi.org/10.36643/mjrl.26.1.thirteenth.
Abstract:
This Article analyzes how the Thirteenth Amendment has been used to prevent forced labor practices in immigration detention. The Article assesses the effectiveness of Thirteenth Amendment litigation by dissecting cases where detainees have challenged the legality of labor requirements under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. Given the expansion in immigration detention, the increasing privatization of detention, and the significant human rights implications of this issue, the arguments advanced in this Article are not only currently relevant but have the potential to shape ongoing dialogue on this subject.
9
Winata, Muhammad, and Zaka Aditya. "Characteristic and Legality of Non-Litigation Regulatory Dispute Resolution Based on Constitutional Interpretation." Brawijaya Law Journal 6, no. 2 (October 31, 2019): 170–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.02.04.
10
Frenyo, Edit. "Unsafe from Any Angle: Vulnerability-Generation on the US–Canada Border." Laws 11, no. 3 (May 27, 2022): 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/laws11030044.
Abstract:
This article provides a review of the functioning and legality of the Safe Third Country Agreement between Canada and the United States, placing it in the broader context of systemic factors that generate and exacerbate the vulnerability of protection seekers. It offers a critical evaluation of what the legal challenges against the STCA reveal about the promises and limitations of safe-country-related litigation and the future of the Agreement.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Legality litigation":
1
Dupeu, Nael. "Les moyens en contentieux fiscal." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023TOUL0159.
Abstract:
Le contentieux fiscal nait d’un désaccord persistant entre le contribuable et l’administration fiscale. Le contribuable qui souhaite contester l’impôt doit présenter une réclamation contentieuse au service des impôts compétent avant de pouvoir, le cas échéant, porter le litige devant le juge. Le contribuable et le fisc doivent alors présenter des moyens de nature à justifier le bien-fondé de leurs positions respectives. Le juge de l’impôt doit apprécier les moyens des parties afin de trancher le litige. Cette étude a pour objet de systématiser les moyens dans le contentieux fiscal. Le caractère spécifique du contentieux fiscal a une influence sur les moyens tels qu’ils sont invoqués par les parties et appréciés par le juge. La nature objective du contentieux fiscal implique en effet de réunir des conditions favorables à l’application de la légalité fiscale. Les parties jouissent ainsi d’une grande liberté pour faire évoluer leur argumentation juridique durant la procédure contentieuse. Le caractère purement objectif du contentieux fiscal est parfois source de déséquilibre entre les parties à l’instance fiscale. L’application objective de la loi fiscale est également au cœur de l’office du juge de l’impôt bien qu’il laisse parfois apparaître une forme de subjectivité dans son appréciation des moyens. L’ambition de cette recherche est d’identifier les traits spécifiques des moyens en contentieux fiscalTax litigation arises from a persistent disagreement between the taxpayer and the tax administration. The taxpayer who wishes to contest the tax must submit a contentious claim to the competent tax service before being able, if necessary, to bring the dispute in front of the judge. The taxpayer and the tax authorities must then present means capable of justifying the merits of their respective positions. The tax judge must assess the means of the parties in order to resolve the dispute. The purpose of this study is to systematize the means in tax litigation. The specific nature of the tax dispute has an influence on the means as invoked by the parties and assessed by the judge. The objective nature of tax litigation implies in fact bringing together favorable conditions for the application of tax legality. The parties thus enjoy great freedom to develop their legal argument during the litigation procedure. The purely objective nature of tax litigation is sometimes a source of imbalance between the parties to the tax proceedings. The objective application of tax law is also at the heart of the tax judge's office, although he sometimes reveals a form of subjectivity in his assessment of means. The ambition of this research is to identify the specific features of the means in tax litigation
2
Bouya, Driss. "Le plan local d'urbanisme à l'épreuve de la hiérarchie des normes." Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSES060/document.
Abstract:
Le PLU fixe, dans le respect de la hiérarchie des normes, les règles d’utilisation du sol sur son territoire. Cette hiérarchie est constituée par un ensemble de normes et principes dont le nombre n’a cessé de s’alourdir depuis la décentralisation. Bien que de nature différente, ces normes s’imposent toutes, à quelques exceptions près, de la même façon au PLU. Ce dernier doit être compatible avec leurs dispositions. Cet agencement, apparemment cohérent, dissimule de nombreuses imperfections. Les normes supérieures non moins générales, peuvent aussi s’exprimer dans des termes précis, mixant élasticité et rigidité, précision et imprécision, certitude et incertitude,… Les rapports normatifs, du fait de leur imprécision, transmettent non seulement la validité déterminée par l’ordre supérieur mais aussi les incertitudes affectant ce dernier. Ils n’excluent pas la possibilité d’intensification qui pourrait aboutir à la conformité ni celle d’un affaiblissement aboutissant à une simple prise en compte. Il revient alors au PLU de tempérer ces excès de rigueur ou de mollesse et d’en ressortir des règles intellectuellement accessibles, relativement stables et juridiquement sécurisées. Mais, l'exercice est très délicat et préoccupe les communes qui ne peuvent adopter une interprétation totalement conforme à l’esprit de la norme supérieure sans échapper à la reproduction, au niveau du PLU, de l’ambiguïté qui caractérise cette norme. Il en résulte un PLU difficilement déchiffrable et juridiquement vulnérable puisque ses destinataires, exposés à la difficulté de donner un sens précis à ses règles et de déterminer avec précision celles applicables à un moment donné, ne manquent pas de le contester. Dans ce contexte, le juge s’est vu accordé de nouveaux pouvoirs en vue de tempérer l’impact du contentieux sur la sécurité juridique du PLU. Ainsi, à un encadrement drastique des conditions de recevabilité des recours contre le PLU s’ajoutent des alternatives à son annulation pure et simpleThe Local Urbanism Plan (LUP) set, within the respect of the norms hierarchy, the using rules of the soil on his territory. This hierarchy is constituted by a number of norms and principles which kept growing more and more since it was decentralized. Even though they’re different, these norms are all applicable in the same way to the LUP, with some exceptions. The LUP has to be compatible with their dispositions. This layout apparently coherent hides a high amount of imperfections. Higher norms, but not less generals, can as well be expressed in precise terms, mixing elasticity and rigidity, precision and imprecision, certitude and incertitude. Since nominative reports are not precise, they share in the first place the validity determined by the higher order, but also the incertitude affecting it. They don’t exclude the possibility it will intensify, meaning it could lead to the conformity, and neither have they excluded the weakening leading to a simple take into account. Then the LUP has to deal with these excess of rigor or weakness and to take into account the intellectuals, accessible, relatively stables, and legally secured rules. But this exercise is very tricky and a lot of towns are concerned since they cannot adopt an interpretation totally conform to the spirit of the superior norm without escaping the reproduction of the ambiguity which characterize this norm at the LUP level. As a result, LUPs become hardly decipherable and legally vulnerable since their recipients, which have hard times to give a precise meaning to this rules and characterize with precision which are applicable to a given time, are always ready to contest it. In this context, the judge received new capabilities in order to temper the litigation impact about the LUP legal security. Thus, alternatives to its cancelling are added to the drastic monitoring of the admissibility conditions of the recourse against the LUP
3
Morón, Urbina Juan Carlos. "The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law." IUS ET VERITAS, 2016. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123219.
Abstract:
This article explains the contentious process of harmfulness. Thus, the author mentions that the foundation of the process of harmfulness has been on our right the survival of the Administrative security of the legality and the public interest butlimiting the self-enforcement, the requirement of belief in authority to pursue the annulment of an administrative act and to ensure the due process of law is being administered.El presente artículo explica el proceso contencioso de lesividad a partir de la naturaleza jurídica de éste .Así, el autor menciona que el fundamento del proceso de lesividad ha sido en nuestro derecho la pervivencia de la tutela administrativa de la legalidad y del interés público pero limitando la autotutela, la exigencia de convicción en la autoridad para perseguir la anulación de un acto y garantizar el debido proceso del administrado favorecido con el acto.
4
Lebret, Anne-Sophie. "La distinction des nullités relative et absolue." Thesis, Paris 2, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA020050.
Abstract:
La distinction doctrinale des nullités relative et absolue apparaît dans notre droit au XVIe siècle. Depuis, la doctrine enseigne que de sa mise en oeuvre, découle l’entier régime d’une cause de nullité. Le caractère opératoire de cette distinction est régulièrement interrogé, voire contesté. Cette circonstance, ajoutée à celle de sa probable consécration lors de la prochaine réforme du droit des obligations, incite à éprouver la pertinence de cette distinction. Pour assurer sa fonction d’instrument de connaissance du droit, la distinction des nullités relative et absolue doit, comme toute distinction binaire, posséder trois caractéristiques : premièrement un critère de distinction solide assurant son caractère opératoire, deuxièmement une différence de régime significative entre les deux éléments composant la distinction et conférant tout son intérêt à celle-ci, troisièmement une différence de nature entre les deux composantes, établie par le critère choisi, et justifiant la disparité de régime. Or, à l’analyse, la distinction des nullités relative et absolue ne possède ni critère de distinction sûr, ni différence de régime incontestée, ni dualité de nature. L’étude de la nature de la nullité nous conduira à retenir une nature unique : la nullité sera analysée comme une sanction de la légalité, qui doit être prononcée. Le plus souvent, elle le sera par le juge et revêtira alors un caractère judiciaire. Dès lors, à l’unique nature de sanction judiciaire de la légalité il est proposé d’attacher un seul régime, autrement dit, des règles communes à toutes les causes de nullité. La nature commandant le régime, ce dernier doit être élaboré en considération de la nature de la nullité proposée. Il conviendra néanmoins de prendre également en considération les dispositions légales spécifiques à certaines causes de nullitéThe scholarly distinction of relative and absolute nullities appeared in our law during the sixteenth century. Ever since, scholarly opinion has been that the entire regime of a cause of nullity depends on the implementation of this distinction. The operational nature of this distinction is regularly questioned, and even discussed. Yet, its probable establishment by the upcoming reform of the law of obligations urges a scrutiny of this distinction’s relevance. In order to fulfil its task of knowledge of the law, the distinction of relative and absolute nullities must, like every binary distinction, possess three characteristics: firstly, a solid criterion of distinction must enable it to be operational; secondly, the two parts of the distinction must correspond to two sets of significantly different rules, this difference being the heart of the distinction; and thirdly, a difference in the nature of the two parts of the distinction, established by the chosen criterion, and justifying the difference of regimes. However, after close analysis, the distinction of relative and absolute nullities possesses neither a reliable criterion of distinction, nor an uncontested difference in the regimes, nor a duality of nature. The study of the nullity’s nature will enable us to state that nullity has a uniform nature: nullity will be analysed as a sanction of the act’s legality that must be imposed. More often than not, it will be imposed by the judge and will have a judicial nature. Thus, the uniform nature of judicial sanction of the act’s legality must correspond to a single regime, in other words it must correspond to rules that are common to all causes of nullity. Since the nature conditions the regime, the latter must be established by taking into consideration the nature of the proposed nullity. Nevertheless, it is necessary to also take into consideration the legal provisions specific to certain causes of nullity
5
Duclos, Nolwenn. "L'excès de pouvoir négatif de l'administration." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Orléans, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021ORLE3074.
Abstract:
Médaille à double face, l’excès de pouvoir judiciaire se dédouble selon qu’il caractérise le comportement du juge qui est sorti du cercle de ses attributions ou son attitude lorsqu’il refuse de juger ou de se reconnaître un pouvoir que la loi lui confère. Cette dichotomie entre excès de pouvoir positif d’une part, et excès de pouvoir négatif d’autre part, est majoritairement étrangère à l’étude de l’excès de pouvoir administratif. Bien que désormais entendu plus largement que son pendant judiciaire, l’excès de pouvoir de l’administration n’est jamais présenté comme un concept susceptible de se dédoubler en fonction de la nature positive ou négative de l’illégalité commise. Ce paradoxe résulte moins de l’absence d’une telle dualité que de la prédominance d’une conception historiquement positive de l’excès de pouvoir administratif qui ramène toute illégalité à un dépassement par l’autorité administrative des limites assignées à son pouvoir. L’exploration des « diverses manifestations caractérisées de l’excès de pouvoir » suffit à constater qu’en filigrane des classifications traditionnelles, les illégalités négatives sont diffuses et multiples. Elles ont en commun de traduire la violation négative par l’autorité administrative des normes qui s’imposent à elle dans son activité juridique, soit parce que l’acte est entaché d’un vice négatif, soit parce qu’elle a illégalement refusé d’adopter un acte positif. Le dessin des contours d’une conception négative de l’excès de pouvoir permet de constater que ses manifestations appellent, de la part du juge administratif, l’exercice de pouvoirs particuliers. L’émancipation progressive de la dimension négative de son office pour lui permettre d’agir positivement à destination de l’administration ou directement sur l’acte administratif répond à un tel impératif. Symptomatique, à bien des égards, de réflexions structurelles qui traversent l’étude du contentieux administratif, l’étude de l’excès de pouvoir négatif de l’administration invite à la réflexion sur la nature changeante des relations tissées par le juge avec l’administration dont il assure le contrôle des actes et le justiciable aux attentes duquel il cherche à répondreDouble-sided medal, the judicial abuse of power is doubled depending on whether it characterizes the behavior of the judge who has left the circle of his attributions or his attitude when he refuses to judge or to recognize a power that the law confers on him. This dichotomy between positive abuse of power on the one hand, and negative abuse of power on the other hand, is largely foreign to the study of the abuse of power of the administration. Although now understood more broadly than its judicial counterpart, the abuse of power of the administration is never presented as a concept susceptible to duplicate according to the positive or negative nature of the committed illegality. This paradox results less from the absence of such a duality than from the predominance of a historically positive conception of the abuse of power of the administration which reduces any illegality to an overrun by the administrative authority of the limits assigned to its power. The exploration of 'the various manifestations characterized by abuse of power' suffices to note that under the traditional classifications, negative illegalities are diffuse and multiple. They have in common that they reflect the negative violation by the administrative authority of the standards imposed on it in its legal activity, either because the act is tainted with a negative defect, or because it has illegally refused to adopt a positive act. The nature of these illegalities, the sum of which draws the outlines of a negative conception of abuse of power, calls for the exercise of special powers on the part of the administrative judge. The gradual emancipation of the negative dimension of one's role to enable it to act positively for the administration or directly on the administrative act responds to such an imperative. Symptomatic, in many respects, of structural reflections that run through the study of administrative litigation, the study of the negative abuse of power of the administration invites reflection on the changing nature of the relations forged by the judge with the administration of which it ensures the control of acts and the litigant whose expectations it meets
6
Benzaquen, Bélinda. "Primauté et recours." Thesis, Lyon 3, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015LYO30015.
Abstract:
Primauté absolue du droit de l’UE ou suprématie des dispositions constitutionnelles ? Consacrée à l’analyse des conflits nés ou à naître entre normes constitutionnelle et celles du droit de l’UE, cette étude doctorale s’est focalisée sur l’analyse du lien entre les termes primauté et recours pour relever que dans ce genre de litiges contentieux un syllogisme juridique inédit est appliqué. Il s’agit de celui qui préserve cumulativement le critère hiérarchique caractérisant les ordres juridiques internes des États membres, à son sommet le principe de suprématie des dispositions constitutionnelles sur toutes les autres et l’application effective de la primauté matérielle du droit de l’Union ; les évolutions récentes du droit interne de l’UE convergent toutes dans ce sens : dans le cadre d’un litige contentieux, la primauté n’est plus une problématique de légalité constitutionnelle, le conflit est contourné. En la matière, les débats sur l’autorité et la force du droit international classique sur le droit constitutionnel ne se pose plus. Il a été séparé entre la force et l’effet des traités du droit international de l’Union. Pourtant sur le plan des principes, même au sein d’un État fédéral, le contenu définitionnel et surtout le maniement du texte constitutionnel n’ont pas été revisités ; la Constitution est le fondement sans être le contenu de validité de la primauté du droit de l’Union, le texte suprême opère en tant que technique de renvoi, il cadre deux types de champs en fonction du critère de l’objet du litige contentieux. Suprématie et primauté sont deux principes de nature juridique différente qui ne s’affrontent pas. La prévalence de la primauté matérielle du droit de l’Union n’affecte nullement la suprématie au sommet de la hiérarchie pyramidale des normes de chacun des États adhérentsAbsolute primacy of Community law or supremacy of constitutional provisions ? Devoted to the analysis of the conflicts born or to be born between EU law and constitutional standards, this doctoral study focused on analysis of the link between the terms of primacy or preemption rule and jurisdictional actions to raise that in this kind of litigation disputes a unreported legal syllogism is applied. It's one that cumulatively preserves the hierarchical criterion characterizing the domestic legal systems of the Member States, at its peak the principle of supremacy of the Constitution over all others and the effective application of the material primacy of Union law ; recent developments in internal law of the Union converge in this sense : in a dispute litigation, primacy is no longer a problem of constitutional legality, the conflict is circumvent. Concerning this matter, the debate on the authority and the force of traditional international law on constitutional law no longer arises. It has been separated between the force and the effect of the treaties of international law of the Union. Yet in terms of principles, even within a federal State, the definitional content and especially the handling of the constitutional text have not been revisited ; the Constitution is the legal basis without being the content validity of the primacy of Union law, the supreme text operates as a reference technique, it fits two types of fields based on the criterion of the contentious issue. Supremacy and rule are two different legal nature principles which do not compete. The prevalence of the material primacy of Union law sets no supremacy at the top of the pyramidal hierarchy of standards of each of the acceding States
Books on the topic "Legality litigation":
1
Levush, Ruth. Israel: Legality of the decision to release convicted Palestinians in the context of peace negotiations. Washington, D.C.]: The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center, 2013.
2
Majelis Agama Khonghucu Indonesia "Boen Bio" Surabaya., ed. Antara formalisme [dan] hati nurani: Sebuah pergulatan pasangan Konfusiani Budi Wijaya & Lany Guito menggapai legalitas. [Surabaya]: Majelis Agama Konghucu Indonesia "Boen Bio" Surabaya, 1996.
3
Carissima, Mathen. Part V Rights and Freedoms, A Litigating and Interpreting the Charter, Ch.30 Access to Charter Justice. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0030.
Abstract:
This chapter discusses how Canadian constitutional issues come before the courts. Its primary focus is on litigation arising under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Since the entrenchment of the Canadian Charter in 1982, traditional legal process doctrines, such as standing, intervention, costs, and reference opinions have seen significant expansion. Though initially cautious, Canadian courts have recognized that the ability to initiate constitutional claims is integral to the principle of legality. The mechanisms by which constitutional issues are judicially reviewed, and decisions regarding who may participate and how such litigation may be supported, are crucial determinants of substantive constitutionalism in Canada.
4
Dashwood, Alan. EU Acts and Member State Acts in the Negotiation, Conclusion, and Implementation of International Agreements. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198817468.003.0008.
Abstract:
The new institutional balance resulting from the Treaty of Lisbon is being tested nowhere as sharply as in the field of the exercise of the EU’s powers of external action. There is a wealth of recent litigation clarifying aspects of the procedural code, now set out in Article 218 TFEU, which governs the negotiation, conclusion, and implementation of international agreements concluded on behalf of the EU. This chapter explores issues connected with the adoption of acts within the framework of Article 218, including the designation of the Union negotiator, the choice of legal basis for decisions on the conclusion of agreements and the enhanced role of the European Parliament in such decisions. Also discussed are certain controversial developments in the procedure that applies for determining the Union’s position in a decision-making body established under an international agreement, and other issues including the legality of so-called ‘hybrid acts’.
5
Coallier, Julien. Abatement of Litigation Agreement - Legally Binding: Banking & Collections, Legal Forms Book. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017.
6
Sawyer, Suzana. The Small Matter of Suing Chevron. Duke University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9781478022572.
Abstract:
In 2011, an Ecuadorian court issued the world’s largest environmental contamination liability: a $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron. Within years, a US federal court and an international tribunal determined that the Ecuadorian judgment had been procured through fraud and was unenforceable. In The Small Matter of Suing Chevron Suzana Sawyer delves into this legal trilogy to explore how distinct legal truths were relationally composed of, with, and through crude oil. In Sawyer’s analysis, chemistry proves crucial. Analytically, it affords a grammar for appreciating how molecular, technical, and legal agencies catalyzed distinct jurisdictional renderings. Empirically, the chemistry of hydrocarbons (its complexity, unfathomability, and misattribution) significantly shaped competing judicial determinations. Ultimately, chemical, scientific, contractual, and litigating techniques precipitated this legal saga’s metamorphic transformation, transmuting a contamination claim into an environmental liability, then a racketeering scheme, and then a breach of treaty. Holding the paradoxes of complicity in suspension, Sawyer deftly demonstrates how crude matters, technoscience, and liberal legality configure how risk and reward, deprivation and disavowal, suffering and surfeit become legally and unevenly distributed.
7
Meeran, Richard, and Jahan Meeran, eds. Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866220.001.0001.
Abstract:
This book reviews the current position in this field, which has developed over the past 25 years, designed to hold multinationals to account, legally, for human rights abuses in the Global South. The authors are practising lawyers who have litigated and led prominent cases of legal significance in this field. Although the focus is on the Global North, where most of the cases have been brought—United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, France, Netherlands, and Germany—there is also a chapter on South Africa. The cases cited include claims against parent companies for harm caused by subsidiary operations, claims for corporate complicity in violations perpetrated by States, and claims arising in a supply chain context. Whilst other books have included consideration of the legal aspects of many of the cases, the focus here is on the interrelated strategic and practical, as well as legal, considerations on which viability and prospects of success depend. In addition to questions of jurisdiction, applicable law, and theories of liability, obstacles to justice concerning issues such as access to information, collective actions, witness protection, damages and costs, and funding regimes (including a specific chapter on litigation funding), and issues relating to public pressure and settlement, are discussed. Although most of the authors act for victims, there is a substantial chapter providing the perspectives of business. Since this area of litigation has developed concurrently with, and has formed part of, the rapidly mushrooming field of business and human rights, the contextual relevance of the UNGPs is considered.
8
Wallach, Daniel L. The “Shifting Line” of Sports Betting Legalization. Edited by Michael A. McCann. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190465957.013.17.
Abstract:
This chapter examines the growing and transformative body of law governing sports betting, with a special emphasis on the Interstate Wire Act of 1961 and the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992, the two principal federal laws addressing sports betting. The provisions of PASPA, in particular, will serve as a launch point to a discussion of the true driver behind current efforts to legalize sports betting in the United States: the recent litigation pitting the State of New Jersey against the four major U.S. professional sports leagues and the National Collegiate Athletic Association. This chapter features an in-depth examination of the New Jersey case and explains how court rulings have opened a variety of pathways for states to legalize sports betting and, at a minimum, have compressed the time frame for federal action to repeal or amend PASPA.
9
Gathii, James Thuo. The East African Court of Justice. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795582.003.0003.
Abstract:
This chapter discusses how human rights advocates and business actors resort to the East African Court of Justice (EACJ). The EACJ has intermediate authority at a thin-elite level in human rights cases because urban-based, human rights nongovernmental organizations, pro-democracy activists, and governmental officials recognize the legally binding nature of the EACJ’s human rights cases and give effect to its rulings. Human rights advocates have litigated cases in the EACJ, even though the EACJ does not have explicit jurisdiction to decide human rights cases. Business actors in general, and the East African Business Council (EABC) in particular, have eschewed litigating before the EACJ. Over the last decade the EABC has pursued an administrative strategy embodied in the NTB Monitoring Mechanism for monitoring, reporting, and removing nontariff barriers (NTBs). Also discussed is the first case filed by a business actor in 2017 relating to an alleged violation of the EAC’s trade rules.
10
Pfander, James E. Cases Without Controversies. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197571408.001.0001.
Abstract:
Cases Without Controversies: Uncontested Adjudication in Article III Courts offers a new account of the power of federal courts in the United States to hear and determine uncontested applications to assert or register a claim of right. Familiar to lawyers in civil law countries as forms of voluntary or non-contentious jurisdiction, these uncontested applications fit uneasily with the commitment to adversary legalism in the United States. Indeed, modern accounts of federal judicial power often urge that the language of Article III of the U.S. Constitution limits federal courts to the adjudication of concrete disputes between adverse parties and rules out all forms of non-contentious jurisdiction. Said to rest on the so-called “case-or-controversy” requirement of Article III, this requirement of party contestation threatens the power of federal courts to conduct a range of familiar proceedings, such as the oversight of bankruptcy proceedings, the issuance of warrants, and the adjudication of applications for mandamus and habeas corpus relief. By recounting the tradition of naturalization and other uncontested litigation in antebellum America and coupling that tradition with an account of the important difference between cases and controversies, this book challenges the prevailing understanding of Article III. In addition to defending the power of federal courts to hear uncontested matters of federal law, this book examines the way the Constitution’s meaning has changed over time and suggests an interpretive methodology that would allow the U.S. Supreme Court to take account of the old and the new in defining the contours of federal judicial power.
Book chapters on the topic "Legality litigation":
1
Barak, Gregg. "Weaponizing the law, litigation, and legality." In Criminology on Trump, 84–108. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003221548-5.
2
Zhang, Chenyang. "Class Action in China?—Representative Litigation." In Win in Chinese Courts, 121–29. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3342-6_7.
Abstract:
AbstractIn China, representative litigation is a system in which some members represent all members of the plaintiff in litigation, but the court judgment will be legally binding on all members being represented. There are similarities between China’s representative litigation and the class action in some other countries. There were few representative litigation cases in China due to the lack of detailed legal provisions and other reasons. However, in 2020, China formulated more detailed legal provisions on the representative litigation system in the securities field. So far, China has established a set of complete and operable representative litigation rules for securities disputes. We expect to witness a gradual increase in the number of representative litigation cases in China, especially in the securities field.
3
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas. "From Strategic Litigation to Juridical Action." In Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights, 299–312. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73835-8_15.
Abstract:
AbstractWith strategic litigation, lawyers and public interest NGOs have sought to bring socio-structural problems before courts around the world for many years. In doing so, they (a) initiate legally substantiated lawsuits that (b) pursue goals beyond a legal process’ “success” and (c) address considerable political issues. Litigation strategists often strive to realise the judicial enforcement of human rights, environmental rights, trade union rights, migrant and refugee rights, and so on, in these proceedings. In other words, they seek to make the law “better.” It is precisely here that legal mobilisation’s structural limitations—also present in the day-to-day business of law—come to light in the context of strategic litigation.
4
Borsuk, İmren, Pınar Dinç, Sinem Kavak, and Pınar Sayan. "Consolidating and Contesting Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: Towards a Framework." In Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Resistance in Turkey, 11–59. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4213-5_2.
Abstract:
AbstractDuring the early years of the ruling Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (Justice and Development Party, AKP), Turkey was seen as a burgeoning democratic power propped up by economic prosperity in line with the reforms for European Union (EU) accession and International Monetary Fund (IMF) conditionality. However, 20 years later, it is considered an emblematic case of democratic backsliding in line with rising poverty and inequalities that have been amplified as a result of sweeping neoliberal reforms and authoritarian consolidation in the country. The recent literature has identified these concomitant and complementary modes of authoritarian governance and neoliberal policies in Turkey as ‘authoritarian neoliberalism’. In this chapter, we discuss the dynamics of consolidation of authoritarian neoliberalism in Turkey as well as the acts of contention against it. Building mainly on the eight case studies presented in this volume, we put forward a framework that explains the consolidation of authoritarian neoliberalism in Turkey through the mechanisms of executive centralisation, autocratic legalism, cronyism, violence-fuelled rentier accumulation, criminalisation and stigmatisation, and contestations against authoritarian neoliberalism through strikes, protests, demonstrations, network building, litigation, everyday struggles, and armed acts of contention.
5
Tchermalykh, Nataliya. "Representing the Child Before the Court." In The Politics of Children’s Rights and Representation, 105–28. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04480-9_5.
Abstract:
AbstractDespite the recent international ascendance of children as independent actors and rights bearers, reiterated by the UNCRC, in the eyes of the state children appear as not-yet-fully-citizens. As minors, they do not have the capacity to launch legal procedures on their own behalf or to formally approach a court of law to vindicate their rights, independently of their parents or legal guardians. In other words, in the twenty-first century, when child-driven effective pro se representation, or a form of representation of a child by a child before the court, still appears utopian, the indispensability of adult legal actors as conduits to children’s access to justice is an undeniable reality and contingent on a multiplicity of social, political and economic factors that influence what forms of children’s representation that is made possible. However, while the representation of children by the third parties has received criticism both in social anthropology, and in (critical) childhood studies, scholars have only rarely addressed forms of representation and active litigation on behalf of the child, conducted by legal professionals in different arenas—in the domestic courts, such as the immigration courts, and in international institutions, such as the EHRC and the UNCRC.This chapter builds on earlier published anthropological and socio-legal analysis of court cases related to migration and political activism as well as on a number of original cases from both national and international tribunals collected through interviews and fieldwork observations. It aims at complexifying the existent models of children’s representation, while tackling broader issues of access to justice of the disadvantaged groups. By laying the focus on interactions among children and their lawyers, the objective is to deepen the conceptual understanding of the ways children and their lawyers conceptualize processes of justice-making and make sense of shifting social and legal terrains around the conceptions of representation. In what way are professional legal representation any different from other forms of representation and are they alienating or empowering? What are the exact legal mechanisms, social processes and agents that enable such cases to become legally actionable and contribute to recognizing children’s role as legal subjects?
6
"US Litigation by Chinese Companies." In Negotiating Legality, 124–58. Cambridge University Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108954891.005.
7
Watt, Horatia Muir. "The Conceptual Economy of Private International Law." In Essays in International Litigation for Lord Collins, 51—C2.N70. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192867988.003.0003.
Abstract:
Abstract This chapter cites the ‘Preliminary Matters’ in the great Dicey, Morris & Collins, which emphasizes the significance of nineteenth century legal thought in the shaping of modern private international law. It explains the fundamental importance of Roman legal thought for the formation of Western law, wherein two different strands of legal scholarship draw attention to the persistence of Roman conceptual frames. Historian Aldo Schiavone observes that the academic study of Roman law has been beleaguered by the difficulty of dissociating its history from the essence of law itself. The chapter examines how the peculiar feature of legality is particularly acute in the case of the conflict of laws and suggests how the conflict of laws might serve as a learning device in respect of other areas of legal knowledge. The invention of a whole new way of approaching colliding norms took place simultaneously across the Western or legal world.
8
Jauhar, Ameen. "Emerging Legal Trends on Hyperlinks and Meta-Tags." In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Business Convergence, Computing, and Legality, 46–53. IGI Global, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4209-6.ch005.
Abstract:
Hyperlinks and meta-tags form two primary tools for Website designs. They are a convenient way to generate easy and faster connectivity on the World Wide Web. Hyperlinking techniques allow a quick retrieval of information, whereas meta-tags present a summarized understanding of the content and subject matter of the Website, thereby facilitating a more accurate list for search engines. That said, content is often hyperlinked or meta-tagged without permission or for abusive purpose. This has led to an increasing scale of litigation on grounds of unfair completion, anti-trade practices, and most recently, intellectual property infringement. Whether it is the dilution of a mark or a copyright violation through an unauthorized use of a meta-tag, the Internet, for its entire boon, has invoked an unprecedented era of technological misuse for commercial exploitation. The current chapter speaks on this facet from Indian and international perspectives.
9
Berman, Paul Schiff. "Global Legal Pluralism and the Making of International Climate Change Law." In The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2022, 109–18. Oxford University PressNew York, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197752265.003.0006.
Abstract:
Abstract Where and how is international law made? For decades, the conventional narrative was that international law is located only in the treaties and institutions that nation-states construct in coordination with each other. However, global legal pluralism scholars have advanced a different account, observing that in any given social field there are many sources of legality that tend to interact with and sometimes compete against each other. In addition, pluralists studied both the “vernacularization” of international law in local settings, as well as the creation of international law in domestic courts and tribunals. The rise of climate change litigation in domestic courts provides a new setting to see these dynamics at play. Focusing on three recent cases, this essay explores the ways in which domestic courts are vernacularizing the Paris Climate Agreement, creating legal duties under domestic law for greenhouse gas emissions.
10
Zumbini, Angela Ferrari. "Standards of Judicial Review of Administrative Action (1890–1910) in the Austro-Hungarian Empire." In Administrative Justice Fin de siècle, 41–72. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867562.003.0002.
Abstract:
This chapter argues that, if France has been the home of administrative courts, Austria has greatly contributed to the development of administrative law with regard to administrative procedure. Thanks to the Austrian Administrative Court, established in 1875, administrative law has been increasingly important in the regulation of public affairs. The chapter analyses the causes, development, and effects of these features. One main theme is, of course, the scope and purpose of judicial review of administrative action. In this respect, the chapter shows the growth of litigation and the liberal approach followed by the Court. Moreover, the role of the Court as lawmaker is examined in the light of the general principles of law that it developed. . Such principles included legality and procedural fairness, with particular regard to the right to a hearing and the duty to give reasons. Considered as a whole, they required public administrations to act reasonably rather than arbitrarily. Finally, it was judge-made law that constituted the basis for the codification of 1925.
Conference papers on the topic "Legality litigation":
1
Abdullah, Yahya. "Judicial oversight of applications submitted to the administration is a reason for its development." In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DEFICIENCIES AND INFLATION ASPECTS IN LEGISLATION. University of Human Development, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21928/uhdicdial.pp191-212.
Abstract:
"The administration performs a great task in the life of modern societies, through its intervention to satisfy public needs through the establishment and management of public utilities that aim to achieve the public interest and respond to the requirements and necessities of daily life, as well as protecting public order, and regulating the relationship between them and individuals with constitutional and legal texts, as well as The organizational rules that lay down the general framework for public liberties and individual rights, all to prevent them from practicing any activity outside the framework of legality. Originally, the administration is not obligated to issue its decisions in a specific form, as it is free to choose the external form of these decisions, unless the law requires it otherwise. This requires that the decision be embodied in an external form in order for individuals to know the will of the administration and to adjust their behavior according to its requirements. However, the implementation of this rule on its launch, may negatively affect the rights of individuals, because the administration may sometimes deliberately remain silent about deciding the requests submitted to it, or it may neglect at other times to respond to these requests. Existence of apparent decisions in an external legal form, meaning that the matter remains in the hands of the administration, if it wants it will respond to the requests of individuals, and if it wants to be silent, which constitutes a waste of their rights, a violation of the principle of equality, and confiscation of the right to litigation guaranteed by the constitution, it requires protection of individuals from the inconvenience of the administration And the abuse of their rights, and put an end to the neglect of employees and their indifference to the requests or grievances submitted to them, in addition to the fact that the requirements of the public interest require that the administrative staff exercise the powers entrusted to them by law at the present time. ( ) For these justifications, the legislator intervened in many countries, including France, Egypt, Lebanon and Iraq, to suppose that the administration had announced its will, even if it remained silent or silent about deciding on the request presented to it, and this resulted in an implicit administrative decision of rejection or approval. As a result of the large number of state intervention in the economic and social fields in recent times, it has led to the multiplicity and diversity of state agencies and institutions, and the public administration often does not provide its services to individuals except at the request of individuals. Therefore, it may be difficult for individuals to identify a competent administrative authority to submit their request to. to get those services. He makes a mistake and submits it to a non-competent administrative body. When this authority is silent and does not transfer the request to its competent authority, and the legal period granted to the administration to respond to their requests has passed, individuals resort to the judiciary, and submitting the request to the non-competent authority prevents the judiciary from accepting their claim, which wastes their rights and thus harms them. Therefore, the administrative judiciary in many countries has extended its control over this case to consider the application submitted to a non-competent administrative body as if it was submitted to its competent authority, given that the state is a single public legal person. Accordingly, the request submitted to any party starts from the legal period available to the administration to meet the requests of individuals and in its absence the implicit administrative decision of rejection or acceptance arises. Accordingly, we will study the jurisprudence of the French, Lebanese, Egyptian and Iraqi judiciary in this study. The importance of the study lies in the implications of the subject of requests submitted to the administration, the delay in their completion, the silence of the administration, and the consequent effects and exposure to the rights of individuals. And that it will show how to confront this silence, neglect and intransigence of the administration. The idea of implicit administrative decisions, resulting from the administration’s silence on the requests submitted to it, is an effective means, which makes the administration more positive and enables individuals to confront the administration’s silence, and prevents its intransigence, arbitrariness or neglect. The problem of the research is that can silence be an expression of the will? How do individuals protect themselves from the actions of the administration, and who guarantees its non-bias, arbitrariness and deviation? Does submitting the application to a non-competent body protect the rights of individuals? ? And the extent of judicial oversight on the authority of the administration.? And the extent of the compatibility and divergence of the positions of the administrative judiciary in France, Lebanon, Egypt and Iraq regarding this.? From the above in explaining the importance of the study and its problem, we can deduce the scope of the study, which is the study of judicial control over the requests submitted to the administration by taking an overview of the nature of the requests, their types and distinguishing them from others, and the position of each of the legislation, the judiciary and jurisprudence from it. The research consists of two sections, the first deals with the nature of the request and what is related to it, and the second is judicial control over the applications submitted to the administration, as follows"