Academic literature on the topic 'Learning process'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Learning process.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Learning process"
Rossi, Rogério, and Pollyana Notargiacomo Mustaro. "Process Management for e-Learning Quality." International Journal of Information and Education Technology 4, no. 4 (2014): 302–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2014.v4.418.
Full textG. B., Najimova, and Kartbaeva N. "Cognitive Linguistics In Language Learning Process." American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations 02, no. 12 (December 31, 2020): 407–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume02issue12-70.
Full textThayamani, N. Evelyn, Dr M. Parimala Fathima, and Dr S. Mohan Dr S. Mohan. "Role of Emotion in Learning Process." International Journal of Scientific Research 2, no. 7 (June 1, 2012): 119–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22778179/july2013/41.
Full textDr. A R. Saravanakumar, Dr A. R. Saravanakumar, Dr A. Balu Dr. A. Balu, and Dr S. Subbiah Dr. S. Subbiah. "Role of Psychoeducation in Teaching Learning Process." Indian Journal of Applied Research 1, no. 5 (October 1, 2011): 79–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/feb2012/29.
Full textPangalila, Theodorus, Javier Tuerah, and Mardan Umar. "Character Formation through Civic Education Learning Process." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24, no. 02 (February 12, 2020): 2335–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i2/pr200529.
Full textVolkova, Liudmyla. "COMMUNICATIVE ASPECT OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING PROCESS." Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ» 1, no. 12(80) (December 23, 2021): 163–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2021-12(80)-163-165.
Full textPatel, Dinesh C., and Dr Umesh A. Patel. "Enhancing Teaching Learning Process using Digital Repositories." International Journal of Scientific Research 2, no. 1 (June 1, 2012): 122–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22778179/jan2013/43.
Full textKe, Weiling, and Kwok Kee Wei. "Organizational Learning Process." Journal of Global Information Management 14, no. 1 (January 2006): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2006010101.
Full textKudryavtsev, V. B., P. A. Aliseichik, K. Vashik, J. Knap, A. S. Strogalov, and S. G. Shekhovtsov. "Modeling learning process." Journal of Mathematical Sciences 172, no. 5 (January 12, 2011): 700–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10958-011-0214-0.
Full textEvans, Malcolm D. "Process, Teaching, Learning." Process Studies 34, no. 2 (2005): 171–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/process20053422.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Learning process"
Ehrlich, Stefan, Jens Gärtner, Eduard Daoud, and Alexander Lorz. "Process Learning Environments." TUDpress, 2016. https://tud.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A33938.
Full textStendal, Ludvig. "Learning about process control." Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, 2003. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-195.
Full textThe research site has been the Södra Cell Tofte pulp mill. The main focus in this thesis is how to learn about process control. The need for research on this theme is given implicitly in the foundation and construction of the INPRO programme. Norwegian engineering education is discipline oriented, and the INPRO programme aimed at integrating the three disciplines engineering cybernetics, chemical engineering, and organisation and work life science in a single PhD programme. One goal was to produce knowledge of modern production in chemical process plants based on socio-technical thinking.
In the introduction I outline how my research questions have been developed and the need for doing research in the field of improving process understanding in a continuous process plant.
This thesis provides answer to the three questions:
1. What are the learning systems for workers in a process plant?
2. What is the implication for learning of different socio-technical structures?
3. How can learning be further improved for workers in the process industry?
In order to answer these questions and to provide a background for why these questions are important to Tofte, I describe and analyse the case plant Södra Cell Tofte. I find it necessary to make this part rather extensive in order for the reader to understand the context under which Tofte has been developing its learning arenas or learning systems. I use a sociotechnical framework in doing this. I want to introduce and use this framework as I regard it as useful for one of my purposes with this work: Assisting the production unit at Tofte to improve learning. I go through technological improvements that have been carried out from 1980 onwards, and one major organisational change that has taken place. The downsizing and reorganisation that took place in 1992 is of importance as well as the organisational development effort named “Employeeship” that took place in 1996. I had a leave from the INPRO project for almost a year following and evaluating this particular project. The situation at Tofte in 1994 was lack of good learning systems, and after a major reorganisation in 1992 the organisation defined a need for better responsibility distribution and co-operation.
Chapters 3 and 4 present and discuss theories in order to give a broader background for the research issues in this thesis. In Chapter three I discuss features and characteristics of a continuous process plant as these have consequences on how knowledge and skills can be developed and why process understanding is a necessity. I present socio-technical system thinking (STS) as one way of regarding organisation and management of a process plant, and I further discuss why I find this approach appropriate for providing learning primarily at the shop floor level as an integrated part of daily production.
In Chapter four I argue that knowledge and skills in production are becoming increasingly important in highly automated remotely controlled process plants and develop a theory of “process understanding”. Process understanding is defined as the ability to predict what is going to happen. In order to predict what is going to happen with a system one firstly need to define the system boundaries. This system can then be regarded as a mental model. One must know and analyse input variables (know where and how to get relevant process information), and by this anticipate, like in a mental simulation, what will happen with the parameters within a defined time period. Different possible options may be mentally tested including what will happen if no corrective actions are taken. An ability to predict what is going to happen with the product, to process equipment or any other process variable, has to be developed and refined in order to operate a process plant optimally. Theories state that a variety of knowledge and skills are required and that some skills can be acquired only through years of experience. The “knowing why” within a process plant also has to be strengthen in order to develop a better process understanding, but as an addition to the experience based “knowing how”.
Models of learning regarding the demands given by the production systems in order to develop such process understanding are presented and discussed. These are conventional methods, experiential (problem based) learning, and collective learning. The experiential learning model is discussed and what may inhibit learning from experiences to take place in a plant. I have defined the concept “learning arena” and regarded each shift in a control room as a main learning arena since this is the place where theory meets practice. It is further discussed that practice will differ between shifts within same control room due to different mental models of the process. In various learning arenas, different communities-ofpractice must be joined in order to make more shared mental models with the intention to align different practices.
In Chapter five the research methods used to explore the research questions, and thus to bring forth theories about gaining better process control, are reviewed. I have been inspired by action research methods in order to answer my research questions and to contribute in a necessary change process where development and use of learning arenas have been central. I have been more or less active in these arenas and played back experiences and theories in order to further develop the arenas. Besides participations in learning arenas, methods have been interviews, observations, and written documentations.
Chapter six is the case description of two different kinds of learning systems at Tofte: Operator Training (OT) - Operator based development and execution of education/ training and Operations Workshop (OW) - Problem based learning aiming at better production practice. I have provided background for the two cases as an answer to the educational challenges Tofte had in 1996 and not least to differences in operational practice between shifts. I describe background, characteristics, and development from what I term different learning arenas where the learning about process control will take place. I have also discussed in what ways these two learning systems can be regarded as learning arenas and briefly the kind of learning that can take place in each arena. In two Operations workshops I provide more details in order to show some strengths of the method.
In Chapter seven I provide answers to the three research questions outlined in the introduction and further refined in Chapter 4.5. I analyse how different learning types such as individual, experiential, and collective are covered within different learning arenas and how OT and OW meet the requirements for good learning systems in continuous process plants. Further I analyse how tasks regarding education and training are better distributed in a shift and daytime organisation with the two learning systems, and further how learning is integrated with working and thus process operators’ knowledge and skills are better utilised. When I analyse the implication of learning of two different socio-technical structures, I also regard how managers are better enabled to become facilitators for learning. The two arenas have been well established at Tofte, but to a varying degree in the different departments. When regarding Operator training it is still too early to conclude on its impact on results in the pulp mill. However, two Operations workshops have made positive contributions and demonstrated the potential of the method. The strengths of the methods are the collective learning that place in cogenerated learning arenas. In Operator training this strengthens the master-apprentice method, and in Operations workshops it gives a shared understanding and direction for further tasks in process control. Finally, based on the analysis of the first two questions I discuss how learning for workers can be further improved.
In Chapter eighth I conclude on my theoretical contribution and arguments for further research in the actual fields. Finally, based on my findings I will recommend organisational choices on future actions. STS provides frames and directions for learning to take place within groups along the production line. It is however not the scope of the STS paradigm to provide theories of what constitutes knowledge in operations of a plant. And the STS theories are not developed in order to cover more specifically models for how learning within and across semi-autonomous units and organisational levels may take place. Thus the main contribution of this thesis is learning theories based on two different kinds of learning models as means to develop process understanding.
Lloyd, Kevin. "Structure learning as psychological process." Thesis, University of Bristol, 2014. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.687189.
Full textCann, Roger James. "Everyday learning gap filling : a process of adult learning." Thesis, University of Southampton, 1998. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/378847/.
Full textHabli, Nada. "Nonparametric Bayesian Modelling in Machine Learning." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/34267.
Full textBerndorff, Dagmar. "Investigating research as a learning process." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2001. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/NQ58944.pdf.
Full textIngle, Timothy H. (Timothy Hardin). "Leveraging the learning process in manufacturing." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/10473.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. 59-61).
by Timothy H. Ingle.
M.S.
Lee, Yang Won. "Institutional learning--the public housing process." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75997.
Full textPotts, Ann D. "Teacher learning within a transactional process." Diss., Virginia Tech, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/38765.
Full textOstroumov, Ivan Victorovich. "Classroom support service in learning process." Thesis, Smart-education: sources and prospects: International Scientific and Methodical Conference, October 17-17, 2014 : theses. – К., 2014. –21-23 pp, 2014. http://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/26585.
Full textBooks on the topic "Learning process"
Biggs, John B. Process of learning. 3rd ed. Sydney: Prentice-Hall of Australia, 1993.
Find full textDixon, Valerie. Learning competency architecture: 6Cs learning process. Richmond Hill, Ont: Learnware Design, 2008.
Find full textMarian, McCabe, Lewis Richard, and Togher Family Centre, eds. Lifelong learning: "The process". Cork: Togher Family Centre, 1998.
Find full textBell, Linda May. Independent learning: Process to product. Toronto, Ont: Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation, 1989.
Find full textLinda, Thompson, ed. Language learning: A lifelong process. London: Arnold, 2003.
Find full textStatistical Learning for Process Data. [New York, N.Y.?]: [publisher not identified], 2021.
Find full textInc, NetLibrary, ed. Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. London: RoutledgeFalmer, 2002.
Find full textSzadzińska, Ewa. Podstawy poznawcze procesu kształcenia: Cognitive bases of the educational process = Kognitive Grundlagen des Ausbildungsprozesses. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 2012.
Find full textW, Galbraith Michael, ed. Facilitating adult learning: A transactional process. Malabar, Fla: Krieger Pub. Co., 1991.
Find full textMoog, Richard S., and James N. Spencer, eds. Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0994.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Learning process"
Vermunt, Jan, and Lieven Verschaffel. "Process-oriented Teaching." In New Learning, 209–25. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47614-2_11.
Full textPoulova, Petra, Miloslava Cerna, Jana Hamtilova, Filip Malý, Tomáš Kozel, Pavel Kriz, Jan Han, and Zdenek Ulrych. "Hotel Process Simulator." In Blended Learning: Educational Innovation for Personalized Learning, 128–36. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21562-0_11.
Full textMockaitis, Thomas R. "The Learning Process." In British Counterinsurgency, 1919–60, 180–91. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-80813-7_6.
Full textPritscher, Conrad P. "Learning and Process." In Brains Inventing Themselves, 1–22. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-708-0_1.
Full textBaron Levi, Jeffrey. "Process-Based Learning." In The Hairy Bikie and Other Metacognitive Strategies, 7–12. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46618-3_2.
Full textRobinson, Adjai. "The Learning Process." In Principles and Practice of Teaching, 10–21. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003347859-2.
Full textWebb, Geoffrey I., Johannes Fürnkranz, Johannes Fürnkranz, Johannes Fürnkranz, Geoffrey Hinton, Claude Sammut, Joerg Sander, et al. "Dirichlet Process." In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, 280–87. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_219.
Full textZhang, Xinhua, Novi Quadrianto, Kristian Kersting, Zhao Xu, Yaakov Engel, Claude Sammut, Mark Reid, et al. "Gaussian Process." In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, 428–39. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_324.
Full textFürnkranz, Johannes, Philip K. Chan, Susan Craw, Claude Sammut, William Uther, Adwait Ratnaparkhi, Xin Jin, et al. "Markov Process." In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, 646. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_516.
Full textGrocott, Lisa. "Design Process." In Design for Transformative Learning, 70–81. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429429743-7.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Learning process"
Humphrey, W. S. "Process feedback and learning." In Proceedings. Ninth International Software Process Workshop. IEEE, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ispw.1994.512776.
Full textSirkemaa, Seppo, and Heidi Varpelaide. "UNDERSTANDING DIGITAL LEARNING PROCESS." In International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. IATED, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.1086.
Full text"FLEXIBILITY ON LEARNING PROCESS." In 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0003414601520155.
Full textNeumann, Marion, Kristian Kersting, Zhao Xu, and Daniel Schulz. "Stacked Gaussian Process Learning." In 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2009.56.
Full textChoi, Jung-Min, and Keiichi Sato. "Interaction as learning process." In the 5th Nordic conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1463160.1463169.
Full textWoitsch, Robert, and Nesat Efendioglu. "Business process oriented learning." In i-KNOW '15: 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-Driven Business. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809578.
Full textTan, Yun Yi, and Allan H. K. Yuen. "Learning Process of Designers." In ICEEL 2018: 2018 2nd International Conference on Education and E-Learning. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3291078.3291093.
Full textVidakis, Nikolas, and Stavros Charitakis. "Designing the Learning Process." In the 10th International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3178248.3178254.
Full textFernández-Robles, Laura, Hector Alaiz-Moreton, Javier Alfonso-Cendón, Manuel Castejon-Limas, and Luis Panizo-Alonso. "Machine learning insights on the learning process." In TEEM'16: 4th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012539.
Full textBehnken, Edda. "The innovation process as a collective learning process." In 2005 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE). IEEE, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/itmc.2005.7461274.
Full textReports on the topic "Learning process"
Willey, William T. Enabling Learning through the Assessment Process. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada523205.
Full textHill, Matthew. Moving the Learning Process Beyond Recollection and Understanding. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1855103.
Full textIdrisova, Zh V., S. Kh Alikhadzhiev, and M. V. Vagapova. INTERNET - TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ACTIVATION PROCESS LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND INCREASING MOTIVATION STUDENTS TO ACTIVE LEARNING. Ljournal, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/5557-3645-6963-86778.
Full textRam, Ashwin. Modeling Multistrategy Learning as a Deliberative Process of Planning. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada399291.
Full textBlonigen, Bruce. Working the System: Firm Learning and the Antidumping Process. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10783.
Full textSherstneva, A. A. Model for organising project management in the learning process. OFERNIO, February 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/ofernio.2022.24951.
Full textFowler, Deborah C. Pinterest and fashion forecasting: Engaging students in the learning process. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/itaa_proceedings-180814-759.
Full textNguyen, Minh H., Lorenzo Torresani, Fernando de la Torre, and Carsten Rother. Weakly Supervised Discriminative Localization and Classification: A Joint Learning Process. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada507101.
Full textNagel, Nancy. A Descriptive Study of an Alternative Process of "Learning-To-Teach". Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.854.
Full textHardy, B., A. D'Entremont, B. Garcia-Diaz, L. Roy, M. Martinez-Rodriguez, T. Clingenpeel, and J. Bakos. PROCESS IMAGE ANALYSIS USING BIG DATA, MACHINE LEARNING, AND COMPUTER VISION. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1568782.
Full text