Academic literature on the topic 'Learning preferences'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Learning preferences.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Learning preferences"
Ch, Abdul Rashid, Irshad Nabi Sandhu, Muhammad Arif Ali, and Asad Ali Sandhu. "LEARNING PREFERENCES." Professional Medical Journal 22, no. 10 (October 10, 2015): 1351–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2015.22.10.1042.
Full textLi, Nan, William Cushing, Subbarao Kambhampati, and Sungwook Yoon. "Learning User Plan Preferences Obfuscated by Feasibility Constraints." Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling 19 (October 16, 2009): 370–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v19i1.13393.
Full textOh, Jaeho, Mincheol Kim, and Sang-Woo Ban. "Deep Learning Model with Transfer Learning to Infer Personal Preferences in Images." Applied Sciences 10, no. 21 (October 29, 2020): 7641. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10217641.
Full textŽnidaršič, Martin, Aljaž Osojnik, Peter Rupnik, and Bernard Ženko. "Improving Effectiveness of a Coaching System through Preference Learning." Technologies 10, no. 1 (January 31, 2022): 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/technologies10010024.
Full textKuznar, Elaine, Grace Falciglia, Linda Wood, and Judith J. Frankel. "Learning Style Preferences." Journal of Nutrition For the Elderly 10, no. 3 (June 3, 1991): 21–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j052v10n03_02.
Full textBlack, Joyce M. "Assessing Learning Preferences." Plastic Surgical Nursing 24, no. 2 (April 2004): 68–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006527-200404000-00010.
Full textSengsouliya, Souksakhone, Sithane Soukhavong, Say Phonekeo, Vanmany Vannasy, Vanthala Souvanxay, and Chanmany Rattanavongsa. "The Effect of Contextual Factor on Learning Styles Preferences of English Majors in Lao Public Universities." Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics 6, no. 3 (December 15, 2021): 683. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v6i3.667.
Full textIsmail, Nadia Nur Afiqah, Tina Abdullah, and Abdul Halim Abdul Raof. "INSIGHTS INTO LEARNING STYLES PREFERENCE OF ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING." Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) 7, no. 1 (January 13, 2022): 390–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss1pp390-409.
Full textRuiz, Luis Miguel, Jose Luis Graupera, Juan Antonio Moreno, and Isabel Rico. "Social Preferences for Learning among Adolescents in Secondary Physical Education." Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 29, no. 1 (January 2010): 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.29.1.3.
Full textMistry, Sajib, Sheik Mohammad Mostakim Fattah, and Athman Bouguettaya. "Sequential Learning-based IaaS Composition." ACM Transactions on the Web 15, no. 3 (July 3, 2021): 1–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3452332.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Learning preferences"
Paciorek, Albertyna. "Implicit learning of semantic preferences." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2013. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/244632.
Full textMiller, Robert W. "Learning Preferences of Commercial Fishermen." Scholar Commons, 2015. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5532.
Full textQomariyah, Nunung Nurul. "Pairwise preferences learning for recommender systems." Thesis, University of York, 2018. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/20365/.
Full textSobrie, Olivier. "Learning preferences with multiple-criteria models." Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay (ComUE), 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016SACLC057/document.
Full textMultiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) aims at providing support in order to make a decision. MCDA methods allow to handle choice, ranking and sorting problems. These methods usually involve the elicitation of models. Eliciting the parameters of these models is not trivial. Indirect elicitation methods simplify this task by learning the parameters of the decision model from preference statements issued by the decision maker (DM) such as “alternative a is preferred to alternative b” or “alternative a should be classified in the best category”. The information provided by the decision maker are usually parsimonious. The MCDA model is learned through an interactive process between the DM and the decision analyst. The analyst helps the DM to modify and revise his/her statements if needed. The process ends once a model satisfying the preferences of the DM is found. Preference learning (PL) is a subfield of machine learning which focuses on the elicitation of preferences. Algorithms in this subfield are able to deal with large data sets and are validated withartificial and real data sets. Data sets used in PL are usually collected from different sources and aresubject to noise. Unlike in MCDA, there is little or no interaction with the user in PL. The input data set is considered as a noisy sample of a “ground truth”. Algorithms used in this field have strong statistical properties that allow them to filter noise in the data sets.In this thesis, we develop learning algorithms to infer the parameters of MCDA models. Precisely, we develop a metaheuristic designed for learning the parameters of a MCDA sorting model called majority rule sorting (MR-Sort) model. This metaheuristic is assessed with artificial and real data sets issued from the PL field. We use the algorithm to deal with a real application in the medical domain. Then we modify the metaheuristic to learn the parameters of a more expressive model called the non-compensatory sorting (NCS) model. After that, we develop a new type of veto rule for MR-Sort and NCS models which allows to take criteria coalitions into account. The last part of the thesis introduces semidefinite programming (SDP) in the context of multiple-criteria decision analysis. We use SDP to learn the parameters of an additive value function model
Zhu, Ying. "PREFERENCES: OPTIMIZATION, IMPORTANCE LEARNING AND STRATEGIC BEHAVIORS." UKnowledge, 2016. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cs_etds/46.
Full textKaiser, Robert Cresswell. "Adult Learning: Evaluation of Preferences for Technology and Learning Sources for Workplace Learning." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2016. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc955033/.
Full textFoley, Nancy E. "Learning style preferences of undergraduate students with and without learning disabilities /." free to MU campus, to others for purchase, 1997. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/mo/fullcit?p9842527.
Full textGallacher, Sarah. "Learning preferences for personalisation in a pervasive environment." Thesis, Heriot-Watt University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10399/2476.
Full textPark, Kyounga. "Learning user preferences for intelligent adaptive in-vehicle navigation." Thesis, Imperial College London, 2009. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.506034.
Full textBergling, Oscar. "Evaluation of machine learning methods to predict payment preferences." Thesis, KTH, Skolan för elektroteknik och datavetenskap (EECS), 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-264504.
Full textExplosionen av maskininlärning, och Artificiella Neurala Nätverk i synnerhet, har resulterat i att tekniken appliceras på allt fler användningsområden. Klarna har redan experimenterat med maskininlärning för att förutsäga betalmetoder, men för närvarande används en hybrid av regler och en Random-Forest modell. Denna rapport ämnar att utreda om en ren maskininlärningsmetod kan överträffa den nuvarande hybridmetoden. För att göra detta testades fyra olika metoder, Random Forest, Neurala Nätverk, Support Vector Machines och Logistic Regression. Det visade sig att tre av dessa presterade bättre än modellen i produktion. Bäst av alla metoder var Neurala Nätverk som var 10 procentenheter bättre än modellen i produktion i recall, med samma precision. Genom att kombinera sannolikheterna från en Random Forest samt ett Neuralt Nätverk kunde ännu bättre resultat uppnås, 11.5 procentenheter bättre i recall än modellen i produktion till samma precision.
Books on the topic "Learning preferences"
Individual preferences in e-learning. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gower, 2003.
Find full textBargar, June R. Discovering learning preferences and learning differences in the classroom. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio Agricultural Education Curriculum Materials Service, Ohio State University, 1994.
Find full text1958-, Robson Graeme, and Smith Richard 1961-, eds. Sports coaching and learning: Using learning preferences to enhance performance. Christchurch, N.Z: N.D. Fleming, G. Robson & R. Smith, 2005.
Find full textHandbook of intellectual styles: Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking. New York: Springer Pub. Co., 2012.
Find full textDifferentiating by student learning preferences: Strategies and lesson plans. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education, 2008.
Find full textCameron, Jane. Continuing education learning preferences and styles of legal clinic lawyers. St. Catharines, Ont: Brock University, Faculty of Education, 2006.
Find full textBreen, Tara June Mary. An exploration of student nurses' preferences of teaching/learning strategies. (s.l: The Author), 2002.
Find full textAnderson, Gordon J. Do preferences and-or skills explain gender based differences in learning? Toronto, Ont: University of Toronto, Department of Economics and Institute for Policy Analysis, 1994.
Find full textWilson, Edwin L. A study of the cognitive styles and learning preferences of fire service officers. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1999.
Find full textReaching and teaching the child with autism spectrum disorder: Using learning preferences and strengths. London: Jessica Kingsley, 2008.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Learning preferences"
Webb, Geoffrey I., Claude Sammut, Claudia Perlich, Tamás Horváth, Stefan Wrobel, Kevin B. Korb, William Stafford Noble, et al. "Learning from Preferences." In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, 580. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_457.
Full textChevaleyre, Yann, Frédéric Koriche, Jérôme Lang, Jérôme Mengin, and Bruno Zanuttini. "Learning Ordinal Preferences on Multiattribute Domains: The Case of CP-nets." In Preference Learning, 273–96. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14125-6_13.
Full textHüllermeier, Eyke, and Johannes Fürnkranz. "Learning from Label Preferences." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 38. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24412-4_5.
Full textHüllermeier, Eyke, and Johannes Fürnkranz. "Learning from Label Preferences." In Discovery Science, 2–17. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24477-3_2.
Full textYang, Fang-Ying, and Yi-Chun Chen. "Learner Preferences and Achievement." In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 1750–54. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_636.
Full textHüllermeier, Eyke, and Johannes Fürnkranz. "Learning Preference Models from Data: On the Problem of Label Ranking and Its Variants." In Preferences and Similarities, 283–304. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-85432-7_12.
Full textAilon, Nir. "Learning and Optimizing with Preferences." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13–21. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40935-6_2.
Full textVan Dyke Parunak, H. "Learning Actor Preferences by Evolution." In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of The Computational Social Science Society of the Americas, 85–97. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96188-6_7.
Full textBaum, Susan M., Robin M. Schader, and Steven V. Owen. "Multiple Intelligences and Personality Preferences." In To Be Gifted & Learning Disabled, 83–99. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003236160-9.
Full textAydoğan, Reyhan, and Pınar Yolum. "The Effect of Preference Representation on Learning Preferences in Negotiation." In New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations, 3–20. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24696-8_1.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Learning preferences"
Seimetz, Valentin, Rebecca Eifler, and Jörg Hoffmann. "Learning Temporal Plan Preferences from Examples: An Empirical Study." In Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-21}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/572.
Full textTondel, Inger Anne, Åsmund Ahlmann Nyre, and Karin Bernsmed. "Learning Privacy Preferences." In 2011 Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ares.2011.96.
Full textBurnap, Alex, Yi Ren, Honglak Lee, Richard Gonzalez, and Panos Y. Papalambros. "Improving Preference Prediction Accuracy With Feature Learning." In ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2014-35440.
Full textGuntly, Lisa M., and Daniel R. Tauritz. "Learning individual mating preferences." In the 13th annual conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2001576.2001721.
Full textSmit, Imelda. "WhatsApp with learning preferences?" In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fie.2015.7344366.
Full textCrochepierre, Laure, Lydia Boudjeloud-Assala, and Vincent Barbesant. "Interactive Reinforcement Learning for Symbolic Regression from Multi-Format Human-Preference Feedbacks." In Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-22}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/849.
Full textPereira, Fabiola S. F., Gina M. B. Oliveira, and João Gama. "User Preference Dynamics on Evolving Social Networks - Learning, Modeling and Prediction." In XXV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Multimídia e Web. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação - SBC, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/webmedia_estendido.2019.8129.
Full textNguyen, Trong T., and Hady W. Lauw. "Representation Learning for Homophilic Preferences." In RecSys '16: Tenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959157.
Full textZhang, Wei, and Chris Challis. "Learning User Preferences Without Feedbacks." In 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dsaa53316.2021.9564131.
Full textSlama, Olfa, and Anis Yazidi. "Learning Fuzzy SPARQL User Preferences." In 2019 IEEE 31st International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2019.00207.
Full textReports on the topic "Learning preferences"
Crawford, Elisabeth, and Manuela Veloso. Learning Dynamic Time Preferences in Multi-Agent Meeting Scheduling. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada457066.
Full textHoffner, Elizabeth. A study of the perceptual learning style preferences of Japanese students. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.6153.
Full textMcFarland, Mary. An Analysis of the Relationship Between Learning Style Perceptual Preferences and Attitudes Toward Computer-Assisted Instruction. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.1228.
Full textBano, Masooda, and Daniel Dyonisius. Community-Responsive Education Policies and the Question of Optimality: Decentralisation and District-Level Variation in Policy Adoption and Implementation in Indonesia. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE), August 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-wp_2022/108.
Full textShyshkina, Mariya P. Сервісні моделі формування хмаро орієнтованого середовища вищого навчального закладу. [б. в.], August 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/0564/2449.
Full textMunasinghe, Lalith, and Nachum Sicherman. Wage Dynamics and Unobserved Heterogeneity: Time Preference of Learning Ability? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, January 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w11031.
Full textMa, Yoon Jin, and Kim HongYoun Hahn. Job Expectations, Job Preference, and Learning Expectations of Apparel Merchandising and Design College Students. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/itaa_proceedings-180814-766.
Full textBano, Masooda, and Daniel Dyonisius. The Role of District-Level Political Elites in Education Planning in Indonesia: Evidence from Two Districts. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE), August 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-wp_2022/109.
Full textGurevitz, Michael, William A. Catterall, and Dalia Gordon. Learning from Nature How to Design Anti-insect Selective Pesticides - Clarification of the Interacting Face between Insecticidal Toxins and their Na-channel Receptors. United States Department of Agriculture, January 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2010.7697101.bard.
Full textLandau, Sergei Yan, John W. Walker, Avi Perevolotsky, Eugene D. Ungar, Butch Taylor, and Daniel Waldron. Goats for maximal efficacy of brush control. United States Department of Agriculture, March 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2008.7587731.bard.
Full text