Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Keynesian economics – History / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Keynesian economics – History'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Keynesian economics – History.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 10 March 2023

Last updated: 11 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Keynesian economics – History.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Guizzo, Danielle. "Why does the history of economic thought neglect Post-Keynesian economics?" Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 119–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09.

Full text

Abstract:

Despite receiving increased interest after the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and consolidating itself as an established research program, Post-Keynesian economics remains under-represented within publications on the history of economics. When compared to other traditional heterodox approaches such as Marxist, Institutionalist, and Austrian economics, Post-Keynesian economics falls behind considerably, contradicting the Post-Keynesian appreciation for the history of the discipline. This article explores some reasons behind this detachment by considering two main factors: first, the recent disciplinary and institutional changes experienced by the history of economics in the last ten years; and, second, the recent ‘maturing state’ of Post-Keynesian economics and its unique treatment of the history of economic thought. The article concludes by suggesting a new research agenda for Post-Keynesianism, making use of the ‘applied’ turn proposed by the recent history of economic thought as one of the strategies for Post-Keynesians to engage with the economics discipline.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kerr, Prue. "A history of post-Keynesian economics." Cambridge Journal of Economics 29, no. 3 (May 1, 2005): 475–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei029.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Biewener, C. "Post-Keynesian Monetary Economics." History of Political Economy 20, no. 1 (March 1, 1988): 145–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-20-1-145.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Bateman, B. W. "An Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics." History of Political Economy 31, no. 3 (September 1, 1999): 601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-31-3-601.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Bateman, B. W. "A History of Post Keynesian Economics since 1936." History of Political Economy 36, no. 3 (September 1, 2004): 581–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-3-581.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Ostapenko, V. M., and E. A. Buglevsky. "Money supply in the history of macroeconomic thought: 50 shades of endogeneity." Journal of the New Economic Association 55, no. 3 (2022): 156–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-8.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper considers the evolution of the money supply concept in economics through the lens of contemporary discussion on the degree of its endogeneity. It is stated that the model of exogenous money supply formation, widespread in the literature and actively criticized in recent decades, is an artifact of macroeconomic thought. Its dominance lasted a very short time period, and various forms of endogeneity were attributed to money supply much more often in the course of monetary theory development. Authors cover the debates between the currency and banking school in the XIX century, the birth of the theory of money multiplier, Keynes’ position, the monetarist view of money supply and its criticism by Post- Keynesians. Particular attention is paid to the turn in views within the mainstream, from the Real Business Cycles doctrine to state-of-the-art models of the New Synthesis. It is emphasized that the complete exogeneity of money supply is a distinctive feature only of the monetarist approach, which has relied on the specifi c assumption of the stability of money demand function. The paper shows that, despite the visible convergence between the New Keynesian and Post- Keynesian positions, based on the modeling of interest rate targeting rather than money supply targeting by the central bank, fundamental differences still remain between two camps regarding the endogeneity mechanism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ramadan, Usamah, and Warren J. Samuels. "The Treatment of Post Keynesian Economics in the History of Economic Thought Texts." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 18, no. 4 (July 1996): 547–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490086.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Dostaler, G. "Post Keynesian Price Theory." History of Political Economy 32, no. 3 (September 1, 2000): 698–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-3-698.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Dow, S. C. "History of Economic Thought in the Post-Keynesian Tradition." History of Political Economy 34, Suppl 1 (January 1, 2002): 319–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-suppl_1-319.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Balakrishnan, Radhika, and William Milberg. "Firm innovation and capitalist dialectics: The economics of Nina Shapiro." Economic and Labour Relations Review 30, no. 4 (October 14, 2019): 467–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1035304619880473.

Full text

Abstract:

This essay is a review of and tribute to the life and contributions of Nina Shapiro, who passed away this year. Shapiro was an American Post-Keynesian economist, who was a bridge figure in radical economics, connecting Marx to Keynes, Schumpeter to Kaldor, the behavior of the firm to the dynamics of the macroeconomy, and the process of innovation to the organization of production and accumulation. She was seminal to important moments in the history of radical economics in the US, including the formation of the Hegel-inspired journal Social Concept in the 1980s and the Rutgers University’s Post-Keynesian circle in the 1980s and 1990s. Shapiro’s deeply philosophical and dialectical approach to firm behavior, innovation, and business cycles led her to theorize the “revolutionary character” of Post-Keynesian economics and to formulate a critique of the competitive neoclassical firm which, she argued, is at odds with the logic of capitalism in which firms seek to make profit and grow. JEL Codes: B24, B32, B51, B55

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

RUTHERFORD, MALCOLM, and C. TYLER DESROCHES. "THE INSTITUTIONALIST REACTION TO KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 30, no. 1 (March 2008): 29–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1042771608000033.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Johnson, L. E., and Thomas Cate. "A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936: A Review Article." Atlantic Economic Journal 34, no. 1 (March 2006): 115–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-6137-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Lee, Frederic S. "The Organizational History of Post Keynesian Economics in America, 1971-1995." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23, no. 1 (September 2000): 141–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2000.11490275.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Mahloudji, F. "Hicks and the Keynesian Revolution." History of Political Economy 17, no. 2 (June 1, 1985): 287–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-17-2-287.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Pat, O'Mally, and Darren Palmer. "Post-Keynesian policing." Economy and Society 25, no. 2 (May 1996): 137–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Barnett, Vincent. "Further Thoughts on Clarifying the Idea of Dissent: The Russian and Soviet Experience." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28, no. 1 (March 2006): 111–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10427710500509672.

Full text

Abstract:

In his Journal of the History of Economic Thought article, “A Suggestion for Clarifying the Study of Dissent in Economics,” Roger Backhouse usefully proposed some terminological clarifications with respect to studying the ideas of disagreement, controversy, and dissent in (Western) economic discourse, heterodoxy being defined as a more narrow category than dissent. Backhouse also wrote that “the ideas on which Marxist, Radical, and Post Keynesian economics are based were arguably never widely held” (Backhouse 2004, p. 265).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Leeson, R. "Keynes and the "Keynesian" Phillips Curve." History of Political Economy 31, no. 3 (September 1, 1999): 493–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-31-3-493.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Blaug, M. "Second Thoughts on the Keynesian Revolution." History of Political Economy 23, no. 2 (June 1, 1991): 171–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-23-2-171.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Skidelsky, Robert. "Keynes: The second coming?" Panoeconomicus 68, no. 2 (2021): 159–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/pan2102159s.

Full text

Abstract:

This article outlines principles of a modernised macroeconomic framework, drawing on John Maynard Keynes. It explores the historical context in which Keynes? economic theory arose, and the history of its application and subsequent replacement by neoclassical economics. The article argues that any updated Keynesian programme must address three new problems: globalization, wealth inequality and climate change. It sketches out the ways in which these might be addressed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Ghivirigă, Teodora. "Keynesian Terminology in Romanian: A Case Study." Linguaculture 1, no. 1 (June 1, 2010): 97–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/lincu-2010-1-0225.

Full text

Abstract:

In The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), Keynes lays the foundations of what is today known as macroeconomics; trying to establish the causes of unemployment and inflation, he introduces a set of terms related to saving, consumption and investment: marginal propensity to consumption, marginal propensity to spend, propensity to liquidities, propensity to savings. His book was translated into Romanian in 1970, although the basic terms pertaining to Keynesianism had already been disseminated via courses in the history of economic ideas. The present paper assesses the way in which Keynesian terminology has been translated into Romanian: hesitations, overlaps can be identified (e.g. both motives and incentives are rendered as mobiluri; however, the major concern is the incongruity related to the terms inducement and propensity, both translated into Romanian as înclinaţie). It also attempts to offer a possible explanation of this incongruity for the Romanian terminology of economics.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Clerc, Pierrick, and Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira. "On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes after fifty years." European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27, no. 6 (September 3, 2020): 919–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2020.1817116.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Boianovsky, M. "50 Years a Keynesian and Other Essays." History of Political Economy 35, no. 4 (December 1, 2003): 781–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-4-781.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Plassard, Romain. "Clower’s Volte-Face regarding the “Keynesian Revolution”." History of Political Economy 50, no. 2 (June 1, 2018): 261–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-6608578.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Fusfeld, D. R. "Keynes and the Keynesian cross: a note." History of Political Economy 17, no. 3 (September 1, 1985): 385–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-17-3-385.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Tarasov, Vasily. "On History of Mathematical Economics: Application of Fractional Calculus." Mathematics 7, no. 6 (June 4, 2019): 509. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math7060509.

Full text

Abstract:

Modern economics was born in the Marginal revolution and the Keynesian revolution. These revolutions led to the emergence of fundamental concepts and methods in economic theory, which allow the use of differential and integral calculus to describe economic phenomena, effects, and processes. At the present moment the new revolution, which can be called “Memory revolution”, is actually taking place in modern economics. This revolution is intended to “cure amnesia” of modern economic theory, which is caused by the use of differential and integral operators of integer orders. In economics, the description of economic processes should take into account that the behavior of economic agents may depend on the history of previous changes in economy. The main mathematical tool designed to “cure amnesia” in economics is fractional calculus that is a theory of integrals, derivatives, sums, and differences of non-integer orders. This paper contains a brief review of the history of applications of fractional calculus in modern mathematical economics and economic theory. The first stage of the Memory Revolution in economics is associated with the works published in 1966 and 1980 by Clive W. J. Granger, who received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2003. We divide the history of the application of fractional calculus in economics into the following five stages of development (approaches): ARFIMA; fractional Brownian motion; econophysics; deterministic chaos; mathematical economics. The modern stage (mathematical economics) of the Memory revolution is intended to include in the modern economic theory new economic concepts and notions that allow us to take into account the presence of memory in economic processes. The current stage actually absorbs the Granger approach based on ARFIMA models that used only the Granger–Joyeux–Hosking fractional differencing and integrating, which really are the well-known Grunwald–Letnikov fractional differences. The modern stage can also absorb other approaches by formulation of new economic notions, concepts, effects, phenomena, and principles. Some comments on possible future directions for development of the fractional mathematical economics are proposed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Rollings, N. "The "Keynesian Revolution" and Economic Policy-Making: A Comment." Economic History Review 38, no. 1 (February 1985): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596647.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Booth, Alan. "The "Keynesian Revolution" and Economic Policy-Making: A Reply." Economic History Review 38, no. 1 (February 1985): 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596648.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Bakeev, M. B. "A compromise between formalism and realism as a way to influence economic policy." Journal of the New Economic Association 57, no. 5 (2022): 113–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-57-5-7.

Full text

Abstract:

In this paper, we argue that economics faces two conflicting societal demands. On the one hand, there is a demand for a practical theory that can be successfully used in the framework of economic policy, in solving various applied problems, etc. On the other hand, the established scientific ethos sets high standards for the internal consistency and formalism of the theory, which often limits its realism and practical applicability. As we speculate in this article, based on the history of the post-war macroeconomic mainstream, the most successful schools of thought in terms of policy impact are those that attempt to respond to both of these demands. This is expressed in the choice of a middle, compromise path: the preservation of a formalized abstract core of the theory while introducing modifications that increase its realism. Based on the study of the influence of four schools in macroeconomics, namely, post-war mainstream Keynesianism (so-called “The Neoclassical Synthesis”), monetarism, new classical macroeconomics, and new Keynesian macroeconomics, on US monetary policy, we claim that New Keynesians turned out to be the most influential school, as they managed to combine the standards of formalism and realism as much as possible.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Rollings, Neil. "British Budgetary Policy 1945-1954: A 'Keynesian Revolution'?" Economic History Review 41, no. 2 (May 1988): 283. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596059.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Garside, W. R., and T. J. Hatton. "Keynesian Policy and British Unemployment in the 1930s." Economic History Review 38, no. 1 (February 1985): 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596645.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Tomlinson, Jim, and Peter Clarke. "The Keynesian Revolution in the Making, 1924-1936." Economic History Review 42, no. 4 (November 1989): 615. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2597121.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Booth, A. "Britain in the 1950s: A "Keynesian" Managed Economy?" History of Political Economy 33, no. 2 (June 1, 2001): 283–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-33-2-283.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Cord, R. A. "Reinterpreting the Keynesian Revolution: A Research School Analysis." History of Political Economy 43, no. 1 (February 28, 2011): 161–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2010-047.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Davidson, P. "Patinkin's interpretation of Keynes and the Keynesian cross." History of Political Economy 21, no. 3 (September 1, 1989): 549–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-21-3-549.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Garside, W. R., and Alan Booth. "British Economic Policy, 1931-49: Was there a Keynesian Revolution?." Economic History Review 43, no. 4 (November 1990): 754. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596762.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Tomlinson, Jim, and Alan Booth. "British Economic Policy, 1931-1949: Was There a Keynesian Revolution?" Economic History Review 43, no. 2 (May 1990): 310. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2596807.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Booth, Alan. "New revisionists and the Keynesian era in British economic policy." Economic History Review 54, no. 2 (May 2001): 346–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.00195.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Pomini, Mario. "Interpreting the path of Italian economic thought: The contribution of Eraldo Fossati." HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, no. 1 (March 2021): 21–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/spe2020-001002.

Full text

Abstract:

In this article, we focus on the figure of Eraldo Fossati, He was a protagonist of the development of Italian economic thought in the central decades of the last century. At the beginning he tried to dynamize the Paretian theory of general equilibrium. In the first phase he emphasized the role of true uncertainty following the Austrian tradition. Ended a short corporatist parenthesis, after the second world war he supported the Keynesian theory and made an original proposal to reconcile Pareto and Keynes, considering the latter not as a revolutionary economist but rather as an innovator who furnished new tools to understanding the real workings of contemporary economic systems with their chronic unemployment. In fact, after the Second World War Fossati was one of the main exponents of the Keynesian turn in Italy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Miller, E. "Keynesian Economics as a Translation Error: an Essay on Keynes' Financial Theory." History of Political Economy 17, no. 2 (June 1, 1985): 265–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-17-2-265.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Khalil, Elias L. "What is Economic Action? From Marshall and Robbins to Polanyi and Becker." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18, no. 1 (1996): 13–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837200002947.

Full text

Abstract:

In the past three decades economics has entered a new phase in its development. The new stage did not involve a revolutionary change of basic tools as occurred with the triumph of neoclassical economics at the turn of the twentieth century and Keynesian economics in the post World War II era. Rather the recent mutation involves the introduction of economic tools of analysis into areas which have traditionally been part of contiguous disciplines. The invasion of economics came to be referred to, even by its enthusiasts (e.g., Stigler 1984; Radnitzky and Bernholz 1986), as “economics imperialism.”

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Blaug, Mark. "The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25, no. 2 (June 2003): 145–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1042771032000083309.

Full text

Abstract:

Something happened to economics in the decade of the 1950s that is little appreciated by most economists and even by professional historians of economic thought. The subject went through an intellectual revolution as profound in its impact as the so-called Keynesian Revolution of pre-war years. I call it the Formalist Revolution after Ward (1972, pp. 40–41), who was the first to recognize the profound intellectual transformation of economics in the years after World War II.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Booth, Alan. "New revisionists and the Keynesian era: an expanding consensus?" Economic History Review 56, no. 1 (February 2003): 125–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.00245.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Dimand, R. W. "Hawtrey and the Keynesian Multiplier: A Response to Ahiakpor." History of Political Economy 32, no. 4 (December 1, 2000): 909–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-4-909.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Rancan, Antonella. "Income Distribution, Consumption, and Economic Growth in Italy." History of Political Economy 51, no. 5 (October 1, 2019): 867–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7803703.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper discusses Modigliani, Brumberg, and Ando’s life cycle hypothesis and its difficult acceptance in Italy over the 1960s and 1970s. The increasing attention to the effects of income redistribution on consumption coupled with the strong influence that post-Keynesian economics exercised on the theoretical and political debate of that time led to a widespread preference of Kaldor’s theory as over the life cycle as the best representation of Italian savings behavior.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Martínez Hernández, Francisco A., and Víctor M. Isidro Luna. "CAPITALISM: COMPETITION, CONFLICT, CRISES, ANWAR SHAIKH." Investigación Económica 79, no. 311 (December 10, 2019): 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.311.72441.

Full text

Abstract:

<p>In 1,024 pages, seventeen chapters, and divided in three books, plus seventeen appendixes, Anwar Shaikh, one of the leading scholars and a distinguished Professor of Economics at the New School for Social Research, presents a path breaking and monumental book which main objective is the unified study of the logic, history, dynamics, and crises of the capitalist system. Throughout this book, the author confronts his own perspective and method of the classical political economy with major schools of economic thought such as neoclassical, monetarist, and different branches of the post-Keynesian school...</p>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Ahiakpor, J. C. W. "Hawtrey on the Keynesian Multiplier: A Question of Cognitive Dissonance?" History of Political Economy 32, no. 4 (December 1, 2000): 889–908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-4-889.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Lucas, R. E. "Keynote Address to the 2003 HOPE Conference: My Keynesian Education." History of Political Economy 36, Suppl 1 (January 1, 2004): 12–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-suppl_1-12.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Solberg, W. U., and R. W. Tomilson. "Academic McCarthyism and Keynesian Economics: The Bowen Controversy at the University of Illinois." History of Political Economy 29, no. 1 (March 1, 1997): 55–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-29-1-55.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Leeson, R. "The Coming of Keynesianism to America: Conversations with the Founders of Keynesian Economics." History of Political Economy 32, no. 1 (March 1, 2000): 167–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-1-167.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Repapis, Constantinos. "Essays in Keynesian Persuasion." European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27, no. 3 (May 3, 2020): 465–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2020.1761667.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!