Academic literature on the topic 'Keynesian economics – History'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Keynesian economics – History.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Keynesian economics – History"
Guizzo, Danielle. "Why does the history of economic thought neglect Post-Keynesian economics?" Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 119–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09.
Full textKerr, Prue. "A history of post-Keynesian economics." Cambridge Journal of Economics 29, no. 3 (May 1, 2005): 475–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei029.
Full textBiewener, C. "Post-Keynesian Monetary Economics." History of Political Economy 20, no. 1 (March 1, 1988): 145–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-20-1-145.
Full textBateman, B. W. "An Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics." History of Political Economy 31, no. 3 (September 1, 1999): 601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-31-3-601.
Full textBateman, B. W. "A History of Post Keynesian Economics since 1936." History of Political Economy 36, no. 3 (September 1, 2004): 581–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-3-581.
Full textOstapenko, V. M., and E. A. Buglevsky. "Money supply in the history of macroeconomic thought: 50 shades of endogeneity." Journal of the New Economic Association 55, no. 3 (2022): 156–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-8.
Full textRamadan, Usamah, and Warren J. Samuels. "The Treatment of Post Keynesian Economics in the History of Economic Thought Texts." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 18, no. 4 (July 1996): 547–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490086.
Full textDostaler, G. "Post Keynesian Price Theory." History of Political Economy 32, no. 3 (September 1, 2000): 698–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-3-698.
Full textDow, S. C. "History of Economic Thought in the Post-Keynesian Tradition." History of Political Economy 34, Suppl 1 (January 1, 2002): 319–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-suppl_1-319.
Full textBalakrishnan, Radhika, and William Milberg. "Firm innovation and capitalist dialectics: The economics of Nina Shapiro." Economic and Labour Relations Review 30, no. 4 (October 14, 2019): 467–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1035304619880473.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Keynesian economics – History"
Turnell, Sean. "Monetary reformers, amateur idealists and Keynesian crusaders Australian economists' international advocacy, 1925-1950 /." Phd thesis, Australia : Macquarie University, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/76590.
Full textBibliography: p. 232-255.
Introduction -- Cheap money and Ottawa -- The World Economic Conference -- F.L. McDougall -- The beginnings of the 'employment approach' -- Coombs and consolidation -- Bretton Woods -- An international employment agreement -- The 'employment approach' reconsidered -- The Keynesian 'revolution' in Australia -- Conclusion.
Between 1925 and 1950, Australian economists embarked on a series of campaigns to influence international policy-making. The three distinct episodes of these campaigns were unified by the conviction that 'expansionary' economic policies by all countries could solve the world's economic problems. As well as being driven by self-interest (given Australia's dependence on commodity exports), the campaigns were motivated by the desire to promote economic and social reform on the world stage. They also demonstrated the theoretical skills of Australian economists during a period in which the conceptual instruments of economic analysis came under increasing pressure. -- The purpose of this study is to document these campaigns, to analyse their theoretical and policy implications, and to relate them to current issues. Beginning with the efforts of Australian economists to persuade creditor nations to enact 'cheap money' policies in the early 1930s, the study then explores the advocacy of F.L. McDougall to reconstruct agricultural trade on the basis of nutrition. Finally, it examines the efforts of Australian economists to promote an international agreement binding the major economic powers to the pursuit of full employment. -- The main theses advanced in the dissertation are as follows: Firstly, it is argued that these campaigns are important, neglected indicators of the theoretical positions of Australian economists in the period. Hitherto, the evolution of Australian economic thought has been interpreted almost entirely on the basis of domestic policy advocacy, which gave rise to the view that Australian economists before 1939 were predominantly orthodox in theoretical outlook and policy prescriptions. However, when their international policy advocacy is included, a quite different picture emerges. Their efforts to achieve an expansion in global demand were aimed at alleviating Australia's position as a small open economy with perennial external sector problems, but until such international policies were in place, they were forced by existing circumstances to confine their domestic policy advice to orthodox, deflationary measures. -- Secondly, the campaigns make much more explicable the arrival and dissemination of the Keynesian revolution in Australian economic thought. A predilection for expansionary and proto-Keynesian policies, present within the profession for some time, provided fertile ground for the Keynesian revolution when it finally arrived. Thirdly, by supplying evidence of expansionary international policies, the study provides a corrective to the view that Australia's economic interaction with the rest of the world has largely been one of excessive defensiveness. -- Originality is claimed for the study in several areas. It provides the first comprehensive study of all three campaigns and their unifying themes. It demonstrates the importance to an adequate account of the period of the large amount of unpublished material available in Australian archives. It advances ideas and policy initiatives that have hitherto been ignored, or only partially examined, in the existing literature. And it provides a new perspective on Australian economic thought and policy in the inter-war years.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
255 p
Ahmed, Najeer. "Addressing the Post-Keynesian Critique: Exchange Rate Determination with an Extended Mundell-Fleming Model." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2016. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1335.
Full textStockhammer, Engelbert, and Paul Ramskogler. "Uncertainty and exploitation in history." Inst. für Volkswirtschaftstheorie und -politik, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2007. http://epub.wu.ac.at/82/1/document.pdf.
Full textSeries: Department of Economics Working Paper Series
Rubio, Flávia Carrasco. "A ortodoxia e heterodoxia revistas em sua base: uma leitura de economia política." reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10438/10589.
Full textRejected by Eliene Soares da Silva (eliene.silva@fgv.br), reason: Flavia, conforme conversamos, acrescente Palavras-chave e Key words no texto. Submeter a dissertação novamente. Obrigada. Eliene Secretaria de Registro on 2013-03-06T13:25:29Z (GMT)
Submitted by Flávia Rubio (flaviacarrasco@gmail.com) on 2013-03-06T13:45:33Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Versão Final - Flavia C Rubioentrega.pdf: 974171 bytes, checksum: 78759987679a971584ffc8771f9b21c0 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Eliene Soares da Silva (eliene.silva@fgv.br) on 2013-03-06T13:46:32Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Versão Final - Flavia C Rubioentrega.pdf: 974171 bytes, checksum: 78759987679a971584ffc8771f9b21c0 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2013-03-06T14:04:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Versão Final - Flavia C Rubioentrega.pdf: 974171 bytes, checksum: 78759987679a971584ffc8771f9b21c0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-02-07
The present study aims to evaluate, from a theoretical perspective, the fundamental basis argumentative which put economic science at distinct level of analysis. On one hand, the strong mathematical apparatus and microfundamentals that support the mainstream economic view. On the other hand, Keynes’s evaluation (post-keynesian perspective) about economic science. Therefore, the first chapter starts rebuilding the orthodox economics in its basis. From that perspective, the purpose of the study is focused on the new classic economic school, furthermore the contributions of Robert Lucas, the best specialist in the wealth and work processes. The second chapter presents the heterodox construction through a post-keynesian perspective, that by analyzing Keynes, and specially the work of Davidson, will propose to look back to political economics. In the third chapter, the objective is to discuss a new methodology of economics, study objects and their positioning within science.
O presente trabalho busca avaliar, de uma perspectiva teórica, as bases fundamentais argumentativas que colocam a ciência econômica em patamares tão distintos de análise: De um lado, o forte aparato matemático e de microfundamentos que sustentam a visão do mainstream economics. De outro a avaliação de Keynes (da perspectiva pós-keynesiana) acerca do objeto da ciência econômica. Para isso, inicia-se no primeiro capítulo uma reconstrução da Economia ortodoxa em sua base. De tal perspectiva, o estudo proposto se concentra na chamada escola novo clássica, sobretudo as contribuições de Robert Lucas, expoente maior, acerca do processo de geração de renda e emprego. No segundo capítulo, apresenta-se o constructo heterodoxo, através de uma perspectiva pós-keynesiana que ao resgatar Keynes, sobretudo os trabalhos de Davidson, vai propor a volta ao olhar de economia política. No terceiro capítulo visa construir o debate acerca da metodologia econômica, objetos de estudo e seu posicionamento dentro da ciência.
Sergi, Francesco. "De la révolution lucasienne aux modèles DSGE : réflexions sur les développements récents de la modélisation macroéconomique." Thesis, Paris 1, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA01E059/document.
Full textThis dissertation provides a history of macroeconomic modeling practices from RobertE. Lucas’s works in the 1970s up to today’s dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) approach. Working from a historical perspective, I suggest that the recent rise of DSGE models should be characterized as a compromise between opposing views of modeling methodology—on the one hand, the real business cycle (RBC) view, on the other hand, the new Keynesian view. In order to justify this claim, my work provides an epistemological reconstruction of the recent history of macroeconomics, building from ananalysis of the criteria defining the validity and the pertinence of a model. My assumption is that recent macroeconomic modeling practices can be described by three distinctive methodological criteria : the internal validity criterion (which establishes the consistency between models’ assumptions and concepts and formalisms of a theory), the external validity criterion (which establishes the consistency between the assumptions and results of a model and the real world, as well as the quantitative methods needed to assess such a consistency) and the hierarchization criterion (which establishes the preference for internal over external validity, or vice versa). This epistemological reconstruction draws primarily from the literature about models in the philosophy of science. My work aims to make four contributions to the history of recent macroeconomics. (1) To understand the rise of DSGE models without referring to the explanation providedby the macroeconomists themselves, who tend to think that macroeconomics evolved through theoretical consensus and exogenous technical progress. By distancing itself fromthis perspective, my work draws attention to the disruptive character of methodological controversies and to the interdependence between theoretical activity and the developmentof statistical and econometric methods. (2) To overcome the existing divide betweenthe history of macroeconomic theories and the history of quantitative methods. Throughits epistemological perspective, my work reconciles these two historiographies and specifiesthe basis for a comprehensive understanding of recent developments in macroeconomics.(3) To put the accent on the external validity condition as the main controversial issue separating different views of macro-modeling methodology. Furthermore, I illustrate how the debate about external validity is closely related to the problem of casual explanation and, finally, to the conditions for providing economic policy evaluation. (4) To characterize the DSGE approach: although DSGE models are often presented as a“synthesis”, or as a “consensus”, they are better described as a shaky compromise between two opposing methodological visions
SAMPAIO, Guilherme. "The translation, diffusion, and reception of John Maynard Keynes's writings in France (1920s–50s)." Doctoral thesis, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/44504.
Full textExamining Board: Professor Ann Thomson, EUI; Professor Youssef Cassis, EUI; Professor Michel Margairaz, Université Paris-I-Panthéon-Sorbonne; Professor Patricia Clavin, University of Oxford
This thesis examines how and why John Maynard Keynes’s policy proposals and economic theories were diffused in France between 1920 and the 1950s. Extant historiography has systematically asserted that Keynes’s writings had barely any impact in interwar France. In great part because of Keynes’s verdict on the Great War’s reparations and indictment of French foreign policy, particularly through his 1919 Economic Consequences of the Peace. The fact that Keynes was persona non grata in France has consequently also been used by historians to explain the belated acceptation of Keynes’s General Theory in that country. At the same time, though, it is commonly argued that France was one of the countries where Keynesianism became the most widespread after the Second World War, as a reaction to chronic economic underperforming in the 1930s and the war’s devastations. Based on an extensive perusal of archival and published sources, I advance, along twelve chapters, a starkly different hypothesis. For a start, I argue that in the 1920s Keynes’s ideas on reparations were significantly discussed in France. His audience was composed not only of detractors, but also of admirers from the Left and academia who helped him translate and publish his writings. The narrative then shifts towards analysing how Keynes’s estrangement from the majority of French public opinion started not with the issue of reparations, but with debates on monetary policy and the gold standard: beginning in the mid- 1920s and heightening during the Great Depression. Afterwards, I scrutinise how the translation and diffusion of the General Theory began taking place well before 1945; but also how Keynes’s theory continued to be resisted by a significant part of French economists even afterwards. And if Keynes’s economics did shape French anti-inflationary fiscal policy in post- Second World War reconstruction, their influence within the French state remained on the whole circumscribed. Consequently, this dissertation concludes that there was never a sweeping Keynesian revolution in France.
Millmow, Alex. "The power of economic ideas : the origins of macroeconomic management in interwar Australia : 1929-1939." Phd thesis, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/148466.
Full textShort, Victor. "Prairie Freigeld: Alberta Social Credit and the Keynesian Frontier of Monetary Economy Thought, 1929-1938." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/44062.
Full textCharron, Alexandre. "The economic theories of Rosa Luxemburg and Michal Kalecki: continuity or rupture?" Thesis, 2018. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca//handle/1828/9998.
Full textGraduate
Books on the topic "Keynesian economics – History"
1941-, Arestis Philip, and Sawyer Malcolm C, eds. 21st century Keynesian economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Find full textPost Keynesian monetary economics. 2nd ed. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 1992.
Find full textPost Keynesian monetary economics. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe, 1986.
Find full textMurray, Milgate, ed. The fall and rise of keynesian economics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Find full text1941-, Arestis Philip, Palma J. Gabriel, Sawyer Malcolm C, and Harcourt Geoffrey Colin, eds. Capital controversy, post-Keynesian economics and the history of economic thought. London: Routledge, 1997.
Find full textRobert, Eisner. The Keynesian revolution, then and now. Cheltenham, UK: E. Elgar, 1998.
Find full text1941-, Arestis Philip, and Skouras Thanos 1943-, eds. Post Keynesian economic theory: A challenge to neo-classical economics. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books, 1985.
Find full textThe making of a post-Keynesian economist : Cambridge harvest. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Find full textThe crisis of Keynesian economics: A Marxist view. Totowa, N.J: Barnes & Noble Books, 1986.
Find full textPilling, Geoffrey. The crisis of Keynesian economics: A marxist view. London: Croom Helm, 1987.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Keynesian economics – History"
Mills, John. "The Keynesian Revolution." In A Critical History of Economics, 132–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403914408_7.
Full textLai, Cheng-chung, and Tai-kuang Ho. "Keynes and Keynesian Economics." In History of Economic Ideas in 20 Talks, 131–37. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4506-9_18.
Full textBurstein, M. L. "Some More Keynesian Economics." In Studies in Banking Theory, Financial History and Vertical Control, 23–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09978-8_3.
Full textBurstein, M. L. "Still More Keynesian Economics." In Studies in Banking Theory, Financial History and Vertical Control, 41–47. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09978-8_4.
Full textHollander, Samuel. "Making the Most of Anomaly in the History of Economic Thought: Smith, Marx-Engels, and Keynes." In Perspectives on Keynesian Economics, 15–34. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14409-7_2.
Full textMátyás, Antal. "A Summary Appraisal of the Keynesian Theory." In History of Modern Non-Marxian Economics, 416–19. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18005-9_46.
Full textMátyás, Antal. "Growth Models Built upon a Keynesian Theoretical Basis." In History of Modern Non-Marxian Economics, 433–69. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18005-9_49.
Full textMátyás, Antal. "Post-Keynesian Micro-Theory of the Demand for Money." In History of Modern Non-Marxian Economics, 399–401. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18005-9_43.
Full textMedema, Steven G. "Gardiner C. Means’s Institutional and Post-Keynesian Economics." In Essays in the History of Heterodox Political Economy, 308–39. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12263-9_12.
Full textArnon, Arie. "Epilogue: The Road of Macroeconomics Away from Keynesian Economics." In Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought, 263–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97703-0_15.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Keynesian economics – History"
Bal, Oğuz. "Theoretical Perspective on the Concept of Sustainable Economic Growth." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c08.01839.
Full text