Academic literature on the topic 'Justification of induction'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Justification of induction.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Justification of induction"

1

Sterkenburg, Tom F. "THE META-INDUCTIVE JUSTIFICATION OF INDUCTION." Episteme 17, no. 4 (2019): 519–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.52.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTI evaluate Schurz's proposed meta-inductive justification of induction, a refinement of Reichenbach's pragmatic justification that rests on results from the machine learning branch of prediction with expert advice.My conclusion is that the argument, suitably explicated, comes remarkably close to its grand aim: an actual justification of induction. This finding, however, is subject to two main qualifications, and still disregards one important challenge.The first qualification concerns the empirical success of induction. Even though, I argue, Schurz's argument does not need to spell out
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jacquette, Dale. "How (Not) to Justify Induction." KRITERION – Journal of Philosophy 1, no. 24 (2011): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/krt-2011-012402.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract A conceptual analysis of the problem of induction suggests that the difficulty of justifying probabilistic reasoning depends on a mistaken comparison between deductive and inductive inference. Inductive reasoning is accordingly thought to stand in need of special justification because it does not measure up to the standard of conditional absolute certainty guaranteed by deductive validity. When comparison is made, however, it appears that deductive reasoning is subject to a counterpart argument that is just as threatening to the justification of deductive as to inductive inference. Tr
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rosenkrantz, R. D. "The Justification of Induction." Philosophy of Science 59, no. 4 (1992): 527–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/289693.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Chihara, Charles S. "Horwich's justification of induction." Philosophical Studies 48, no. 1 (1985): 107–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00372411.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Nedeljković, Mitar. "The problem of justifying inductive reasoning." Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Pristini 51, no. 2 (2021): 387–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/zrffp51-30620.

Full text
Abstract:
In this paper, the author considers the classical strategies of defense from Hume's argument against induction, and assesses the extent to which they were found to be successful. Synthetic, linguistic, a priori, pragmatic, and inductive strategies of defending induction are considered, as well as the question of the extent to which the justification of induction is a problem for grounding scientific knowledge. A new argument is introduced for the a priori justification of induction, as well as a critique of the synthetic and inductive defenses of induction by Black and Jacquette.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nielsen, Michael. "A new justification of induction." Metascience 29, no. 2 (2020): 209–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11016-020-00522-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Schurz, Gerhard. "Meta-Induction and Social Epistemology: Computer Simulations of Prediction Games." Episteme 6, no. 2 (2009): 200–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/e1742360009000641.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTThe justification of induction is of central significance for cross-cultural social epistemology. Different ‘epistemological cultures’ do not only differ in their beliefs, but also in their belief-forming methods and evaluation standards. For an objective comparison of different methods and standards, one needs (meta-)induction over past successes. A notorious obstacle to the problem of justifying induction lies in the fact that the success of object-inductive prediction methods (i.e., methods applied at the level of events) can neither be shown to be universally reliable (Hume's insig
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Nelson, John O. "Induction: A Non-Sceptical Humean Solution." Philosophy 67, no. 261 (1992): 307–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031819100040432.

Full text
Abstract:
Pre-analytically at least some of our inductions seem to be possessed of rational justification. This comment would apply, for instance, to my present induction, ‘If that climber high on the Flatirons falls he will be killed,’ not to mention such more momentous inductions as, ‘If a full-scale nuclear war breaks out there will be greater destruction than in World War II.’ Notoriously, however, a few Humean reflections seem to strip even the most plausible of our inductions of all possible rational justification, leaving them mere bare psychological faits accomplis: in effect, section V of the E
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Brueckner, Anthony. "Bonjour’s a Priori Justification of Induction." Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82, no. 1 (2001): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00115.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Campbell, Scott, and James Franklin. "Randomness and the Justification of Induction." Synthese 138, no. 1 (2004): 79–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:synt.0000012206.01154.c7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!