Journal articles on the topic 'Justice Systems and Administration'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Justice Systems and Administration.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Justice Systems and Administration.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Tomlinson, Joe. "Justice in Automated Administration." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40, no. 4 (2020): 708–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa025.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract— Public administration has, for some time now, been undergoing a digital transformation. Part of this change is the replacement of human public officials with automated decision-making systems. Beyond its immediate social and political significance, the EU Settlement Scheme—the mechanism established to allow EU citizens to remain resident in the UK after Brexit—represents the coming of age of a new template for automated administration. Understood in its context, this template raises foundational questions about the nature of administrative justice in the emerging digital state. This template, while it has various potential advantages, is essentially half-baked, contains significant risks without sufficient safeguards and requires revision before its suggested wider future application becomes a reality. Amendments to the template ought to be framed by reference to the precautionary principle, as this would continue to make for efficient implementation of policy while better protecting individuals in this experimental phase of automated administration.
2
Weatherburn, Don. "STRATEGIES FOR MANAGING CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS." Australian Journal of Public Administration 53, no. 1 (March 1994): 67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1994.tb01861.x.
Full text
3
Okunola, Rashidi Akanji, and Matthias Olufemi Dada Ojo. "Re-Assessing the Relevance and Efficacy of Yoruba Gods as Agents of Punishment: A Study of Sango and Ogun." Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 7, no. 4 (March 4, 2016): 1057–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.21301/eap.v7i4.9.
Full textAbstract:
The general objective of this paper was to investigate the relevance and efficiency of Yoruba gods in the administration of punishment and justices on crime commitment. Two Yoruba gods (Sango and Ogun) were principally chosen. Six hundred (600) participants were conveniently sampled from three localities from three geo-political states in the western part of Nigeria. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used in the description of the samples and frequency distribution tables were employed in the presentation of the data. The results show that Yoruba natives still fear and respect these gods. The gods are still relevant and efficient in the administration of punishment on crime commission. The Yoruba natives show preference for the non-conventional punishments of these gods to modern criminal justice systems. Finally, the paper recommends the opinion survey polls on the inclusion of the invocations of these gods in the criminal justice systems of Nigeria and the likely implementations of the invocations in official swearing in ceremony for political and public office holders and the administration of the invocations in Nigerian courts of law.
4
C. Knoeppel, Robert, Patricia F. First, Matthew R. Della Sala, and Chinasa A. Ordu. "Finance equity, student achievement, and justice." Journal of Educational Administration 52, no. 6 (August 26, 2014): 812–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jea-02-2013-0019.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the connections between state education finance distribution models and student achievement. To date, lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of state finance systems have been heard in 45 states; the judicial interpretation of the requirement to provide equality of educational opportunity has led to changes in finance distribution models as well as the implementation of accountability policy. Design/methodology/approach – The study included district level finance and achievement data from five states. Researchers reviewed the relevant judicial interpretation of the finance system, the accountability policy, and the finance distribution system. Next, researchers calculated the equity of both the finance distribution model and measures of student achievement. Finally, an equity ratio was developed and calculated to discern the degree to which state distribution models resulted in equitable measures of student achievement. Findings – Findings reveal that no state has both an equitable system of finance and equitable measures of student achievement. The way that states define proficiency significantly impacts the percentage of students that reach proficiency. This impacts the provision of equality of opportunity. Originality/value – Traditionally, the measurement of equity has only been applied to finance distribution systems. The authors of this paper have applied these concepts to measures of student achievement and aligned the two concepts with the equity ratio. Since states are charged with providing sufficient resources to enable students to reach proficiency, an understanding of the interaction between resources and achievement is a critical tool in analyzing the provision of equal opportunity.
5
Townsend, Wendy A. "Systems Changes Associated with Criminal Justice Treatment Networks." Public Administration Review 64, no. 5 (September 2004): 607–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00407.x.
Full text
6
Hwang, Phyllis. "Reform of the Administration of Justice System at the United Nations." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 8, no. 2 (2009): 181–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180309x451088.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractFor nearly six decades, the administration of justice system at the United Nations has been comprised primarily of the Joint Appeals Boards, the Joint Disciplinary Committees and the UN Administrative Tribunal. In July 2009, these bodies will be dismantled and replaced with an entirely new system. This article will first describe the basic features of the administration of justice system at the United Nations that existed prior to July 2009. It will then review the history of efforts to reform the system, leading up to the proposals of the Redesign Panel issued in August 2006. It will also look at similar initiatives implemented by other intergovernmental organizations to reform their own internal justice systems in recent years. Finally, the article will highlight the main elements of the new administration of justice system, as approved by the General Assembly in 2007-2008, and examine its implications for UN staff members in the future.
7
Mahmood, Tahir, Sajjad Ali Khan, and Shahab Sarwar. "Integrated Justice in Pakistan: From Legal Pluralism to Normative Convergence." Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 16, no. 4 (October 23, 2018): 805–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4335/16.4.805-820(2018).
Full textAbstract:
Legal pluralism, throughout most of developing countries, has been extant since the onset of colonial era. Manifested in a variety of forms, legal pluralism is inherently characterized by both promises as well as limitations. In Pakistan, legal pluralism is epitomized by the prevalence and functioning of parallel systems of justice such as formal courts and Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism (ADRM), such as “Jirga. Poor coordination and tenuous enforcement mechanisms, however, render the formal justice system in Pakistan one of poorest performers in terms of judicial efficacy world-wide. This article seeks to explore the possibility of a convergence between traditional and modern models of dispute resolution, i.e. Jirga and court system and the resultant efficacy thereof through devising a conceptual framework. The framework reveals that both formal courts and Jirga demonstrate marked discrepancies concerning their efficacy with respect to the provision of justice and dispute resolution. Findings from the field, however, evince that Jirga stand out to be a relatively more effective mechanism of dispute resolution than formal courts. The conceptual framework, however, implies that by converging both systems it is possible to cope with the limitations of each of the two systems such that while courts could provide legal legitimacy to the Jirga by improving its decency and accountability through regulations, Jirga could enhance the legitimacy of courts by improving its accessibility and transparency through feedback mechanisms. The article concludes by way of arguing that instead of parting ways with each other, both courts and jirga shall seek to go hand in hand in order avoid delays in the provision of justice.
8
Ngoepe, Mpho, and Salmon Makhubela. "“Justice delayed is justice denied”." Records Management Journal 25, no. 3 (November 16, 2015): 288–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/rmj-06-2015-0023.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate the cases of “delayed and denied” justice that resulted from a lack of or poor record-keeping in the South African courts and police service with a view to encouraging proper records management. Proper records management plays a significant role in supporting the justice system. Records provide the critical evidence that a particular action or transaction took place and can be used as evidence in a court of law. Without reliable and authentic records, government cannot administer justice and, as a result, offenders can be set free while the victims are denied justice. Design/methodology/approach – Utilising content analysis, this study extracted print media articles (2000-2012) relating to the “records and justice system” from the South African Media database, which is one of the databases hosted by the South African Bibliographic and Information Network. The study selected cases reported in the media to conduct follow-up interviews with a policeman, lawyer and judge to discover the implications of the unavailability of required records in court cases. Furthermore, access was given to three selected cases that were given high profile in the media and these cases were analysed to find out what the final verdict in each case was. Findings – Results of the study suggest that some criminal cases were withdrawn due to missing dockets or cases not properly registered. In some instances, records were reconstructed, resulting in the travesty of justice. The study concludes by arguing that if records are not accounted for, lawyers, prosecutors and magistrates could dispute the authenticity of records. As a result, justice for victims would be delayed and ultimately denied while the perpetrators are freed. Research limitations/implications – The findings and recommendations of this study may go a long way in helping courts in South Africa to manage records properly to support the justice system. Furthermore, the study is a useful compilation of the importance of missing records for social purposes. Originality/value – In an attempt to show the role of records management in the administration of justice in South Africa, this study used a triangulation of data collection tools. This is a new attempt, especially in the South African context. Previous studies in southern Africa only looked at the management of records in supporting justice system.
9
Mollah, Md Al-Ifran. "Administration of State Sponsored Local Justice System: An Appraisal on the Legal Framework of Village Courts in Bangladesh." International Journal of Legal Information 44, no. 3 (November 2016): 235–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jli.2016.36.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractAccess to justice is one of the significant pre-requisites for sustainable human development and it has been made available in the form of both the formal and informal systems stretching from the very top of the judiciary to the local justice system in Bangladesh. The formal justice system, even though it plays the most pivotal role, has been facing huge pressure from case backlogs, which ultimately hampers the true spirit of justice. On the other hand, most people's perception towards informal justice system is also fairly poor with lack of trust due to partisan political interference, corruption, religious dogmas, and social elitism, which have made this system almost ineffective. Consequently, state-sponsored local justice system has come forward with a view to combining the both streams in a single channel in the form of restorative justice and a quorum of quasi-formal justice system aimed at ensuring and dispensing justice to the people in rural areas in an affordable and convenient manner. In line with this view, village courts have been established to redress petty civil and criminal issues. This article attempts to examine the feasibility of the present legal framework of village courts to deliver justice efficiently at the grassroots level.
10
Franco-Vivanco, Edgar. "Justice as Checks and Balances." World Politics 73, no. 4 (September 1, 2021): 712–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0043887121000125.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACTThe centralization of conflict resolution and the administration of justice, two crucial elements of state formation, are often ignored by the state-building literature. This article studies the monopolization of justice administration, using the historical example of the General Indian Court (gic) of colonial Mexico. The author argues that this court’s development and decision-making process can show us how the rule of law develops in highly authoritarian contexts. Centralized courts could be used strategically to solve an agency problem, limiting local elites’ power and monitoring state agents. To curb these actors’ power, the Spanish Crown allowed the indigenous population to raise claims and access property rights. But this access remained limited and subject to the Crown’s strategic considerations. The author’s theory predicts that a favorable ruling for the indigenous population was more likely in cases that threatened to increase local elites’ power. This article shows the conditions under which the rule of law can emerge in a context where a powerful ruler is interested in imposing limits on local powers—and on their potential predation of the general population. It also highlights the endogenous factors behind the creation of colonial institutions and the importance of judicial systems in colonial governance.
11
Rottman, Joseph W., L. Douglas Smith, David A. Long, and Chuck Crofts. "Implementing Judicial Management Systems Within an Integrated Justice Information Framework." American Review of Public Administration 37, no. 4 (December 2007): 436–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074006299140.
Full text
12
Edwards, Daniel David, and Nicole Darnall. "Averting Environmental Justice Claims? The Role of Environmental Management Systems." Public Administration Review 70, no. 3 (May 2010): 422–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02156.x.
Full text
13
GOODIN, ROBERT E. "Temporal Justice." Journal of Social Policy 39, no. 1 (September 18, 2009): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0047279409990225.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractDistributive justice is ordinarily calibrated in monetary terms. But money is not the only resource that matters to people. Talk of the ‘work−life balance’ points to another: time. Control over one's time, the capacity to spend it as one wishes, is another important resource; and its distribution raises another important aspect of justice. Here I describe a new method of distinguishing how much time one has discretionary control over, net of the amount it is necessary to spend in certain ways given one's circumstances. To draw out the distributive-justice implications of these calculations, I contrast the most-to-least privileged, in terms of discretionary time: a person in a dual-earner couple with no children, versus a lone mother. The magnitude of the gap between the discretionary time enjoyed by the best and worst is a measure of temporal injustice. That gap is substantially larger in some countries (such as the US and Australia) than in others (such as Finland and Sweden). Conventional welfare-state interventions – tax and transfer systems, support for child care – contribute pretty similarly to reducing that particular gap across all the countries examined. Differing practices surrounding the dissolution of marriages with children potentially makes a much bigger difference. Differing labour-market policies might make a similarly large difference yet again.
14
Cheremisina, Yu S. "Right of Citizens to Participate in the Administration of Justice: Concept, Legal Nature and Content." Pravo: istoriya i sovremennost', no. 3(12) (2020): 066–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.17277/pravo.2020.03.pp.066-075.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to a comparative legal study of the consolidation, content and mechanism of the implementation of the right to the administration of justice in the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and the Republic of Belarus. The article reveals the normative legal foundations of the right to administer justice in the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republic of Belarus, securing the place of the right to administer justice in the system of rights, the significance of this right for citizens, the way of securing the right in law. The author analyzes the powers of the right to administer justice from the position of researchers of the theory of subjective law. Attention is paid to the requirements for persons who have expressed a desire to exercise the right to administer justice as a jury, arbitration, and people’s assessors, judges in the legislation of the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and the Republic of Belarus. The author analyzes the validity of professional and reputation requirements enshrined in legislation. The result of the research in the article was the identification of similarities and differences in the mechanisms for the implementation of the right to the administration of justice in the above legal systems.
15
Qaiser, Zarfishan, and Khushbakht Qaiser. "Evolving Mechanisms for Rehabilitation of offenders through Probation as an alternative to Punishment in Judicial system of Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review V, no. III (September 30, 2020): 62–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(v-iii).08.
Full textAbstract:
Crime and punishment have always been considered as two sides of the same coin. In the primitive legal systems, the real object of inflicting punishment was deterrent and retributive, however, with the evolution of concepts of rights and civil liberties the restorative justice movement started gaining momentum in criminal administration of justice, the need to reconsider the objects of punishment has arisen and various theories were evolved to juxtapose these two extremes in such an optimum manner that ends of administration of justice could best be achieved. This article aims to find out the ways for proper implementation of probation laws to make community service as an alternative to crude punishment which seemed to have ignored the very object of punishment i.e., reformation for the betterment of society
16
Момотов, Виктор, and Viktor Momotov. "ECONOMICS OF JUSTICE: THE STATE WEAL AND THE BENEFITS OF A PRIVATE PERSON." Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 3, no. 3 (July 10, 2017): 5–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/article_593fc3438b36c6.70253943.
Full textAbstract:
The economic component of the courts’ activities on the administration of justice is a complex issue that, unfortunately, still remained outside the field of view of the Russian researchers. The court financing system, as well as mechanisms to improve the economic efficiency of the administration of justice are topical issues of the modern legal orders, which are closely associated with the principle of independence of judges and the guarantees of independence. Justice is a point of collision of public and private interests, that is why the question of the relation of these interests within the economy of justice is particularly relevant. The purpose of this study is to identify trends in economic aspect of the activity of courts from the standpoint of the ratio between private and public interests both in Russian and in foreign legal systems of Continental-European and Anglo-American legal families, as well as determining the future prospects of such development. The objective of the study is to analyze the financing systems of the judicial system and mechanisms to improve the economic efficiency of the administration of justice, including the optimization of the case load, the introduction of e-justice, regulation of the state fee. To achieve the goals and objectives of the study can be applied a systemic-structural, comparative legal, historical, systemic and statistical methods and scientific methods of induction and deduction.
As the results of the study were identified the main models of financing of the judiciary and tendencies of their development, the problem of the case load and ways for its reduction were considered in comparative legal aspect in present article. Also the author has taken an assessment of institutions of electronic justice and state duties, as well as their role in improving the economic efficiency of the courts. On the basis of these results the author has made a few suggestions for the further development of the proceedings.
17
Gohary, Ali, Hamid Alizadeh, and Kambiz Heidarzadeh Hanzaee. "How co-creation uplift suggestion systems’ performance." Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration 8, no. 2 (June 6, 2016): 197–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/apjba-11-2015-0095.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – Suggestion systems have always been used as the means of continuous development and co-creating values among the employees of organizations. On the other hand, the co-creation has been introduced as a solution to co-create values between companies and customers. Since a simultaneous study on setting up suggestion systems and co-creation among employees and customers have been ignored so far, the purpose of this paper, focussing on the combination of two strategies of suggestion systems (generally more effective among the employees of organizations) and co-creation (studied so far merely the scope of customers), is to evaluate variables leading to intention to use, improvement in understanding the concept of justice, and positive word-of-mouth. Design/methodology/approach – Two between-subjects experiments were carried out to explore the interactional role of co-creation, reward, and time in efficiency of suggestion systems. The first study which was carried out among customers analyzed the effect of setting up suggestion systems along with co-creation on the amount of their intention to use this system in the future and positive word-of-mouth. The second study discussed the effect of setting up suggestion systems along with co-creation on the level of understanding organizational justice and commitment. Findings – The results indicate that the effectiveness of co-creation and tangible factors, such as offered reward, on improving the evaluation of suggestion system. In the other word, when firm’s encourage customers to participate in value co-creation program in suggestion system, they perceive more justice and intend to participate more in such program in future. Originality/value – Most of the previous studies carried out on co-creation considered its effectiveness on occasions when a service failure occurs to consumers and the service provider urgently needs service recovery, but this paper aimed to provide a collaborative perspective toward co-creation through suggestion system that puts emphasis on service experience, innovation, and intention to future participation in such programs.
18
Gordilho, Heron José De Santana, and Kenneth Williams. "Introducing consensual criminal justice in Brazil." Revista Brasileira de Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça 11, no. 36 (June 30, 2017): 35–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.30899/dfj.v11i36.110.
Full textAbstract:
This article of law review makes a comparative study between the criminal systems of Brazil and the USA. Using the functional method focusing on similarities between the criminal legal systems of Brazil and the United States. it first examines the North American system, which is based on popular participation in the administration of justice and the consensual truth. The article reviews the principles of due process and substantive legal process from judicial interpretations of the US Supreme Court. This system has allowed the US 95% of criminal trails are resolved through negotiation between prosecution and defense, which makes the system faster, efficient and democratic, for allowing the accused to participate in the decision on the criminal sanction that will be reckoned. Finally, the author criticizes the Brazilian legislation, which from the Act n. 9099/95 introduced the consensual truth in the Brazilian criminal system to crimes punishable by up to two years in prison. The article proposes the extension of this legal institute for any type of crime.
19
Lu, Xiaojun, and Mary E. Guy. "Political skill, organizational justice, and career success in mainland China." International Review of Administrative Sciences 84, no. 2 (April 18, 2016): 371–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020852315619025.
Full textAbstract:
Organizational justice is a topic popularized for Western bureaucracies but there is less known about its influence in Eastern cultures. This research tests how organizational justice moderates the relationship between political skill and career success in the Chinese public sector. Analysis reveals that four dimensions of political skill (networking ability, apparent sincerity, social astuteness, and interpersonal influence) correlate positively with career success (measured as perceived internal marketability and perceived career success). Although hypothesized that organizational justice would lessen the influence of political skill on career success as a result of the implementation of formal merit-based pay rules, findings show that political skill is only partially moderated. While lessening the value of social astuteness, a positive relationship between interpersonal influence and internal marketability remains. Points for practitioners Profound changes in China’s salary system challenge traditional workplace customs. The implementation of merit-based pay requires a fair procedure for determining salary raises. In China, personalism remains a driving force because of the importance of guanxi. This affects how formal merit-based pay systems function in the East. Chinese culture tempers Western notions of organizational justice with its persistent reliance on political skill. This blend of worker behavior and career success, moderated by a conceptualization of organizational justice that embraces political skill, complicates the application of Western management systems in the East.
20
Ame, Robert Kwame. "The Origins of the Contemporary Juvenile Justice System in Ghana." Journal of Family History 43, no. 4 (September 17, 2018): 394–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363199018798099.
Full textAbstract:
The origin(s) of the contemporary juvenile justice system in Ghana could be traced to the country’s colonial era just like most modern criminal justice institutions in Africa. Colonization and its consequent introduction of English education, laws, administration, and Christianity challenged the traditional agencies for maintaining social control and the system of justice. But to fully appreciate the new juvenile justice system that was introduced, one must first appreciate the system that was in place in the precolonial era. Based on an analysis of secondary sources, this article argues that the systems in place during both the colonial and precolonial periods were reflective of a particular perception of children in each era.
21
Orogványiová, Petra. "Taxation and Justice: A Classical Liberal Perspective." Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 23, no. 3 (January 2005): 153–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.51952/przx4958.
Full textAbstract:
We attempt to present a classical liberal perspective on the subject of taxation and justice. We Start by reviewing the development of the notion of justice over time and across various schools of thought. We then proceed to examine John Rawls’ theory of justice and its policy implications and economic theory of optimal taxation. After finding both approaches unsatisfactory, we defend a libertarian stand on the issue of justice. The main result of our reflections are three criteria which we afterwards use to examine normatively different ways of taxation. We conclude by saying that current tax Systems satisfy neither of these criteria and deserve being changed.
22
O Mbori, Harrison. "Discreet Discretion and Moderate Moderation in Judicial Sentencing: A commentary on Kenya’s Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016." Strathmore Law Journal 3, no. 1 (August 1, 2017): 89–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.52907/slj.v3i1.33.
Full textAbstract:
Criminal sentencing is an integral part in any judicial system for the fair administration of justice. The process of sentencing and the standards applied by judicial officers has, however, been a notoriously difficult component in many criminal law systems. In Kenya, sentencing has been blamed as one of the sources of ‘popular dissatisfaction with the administration of justice’ to borrow from Roscoe Pound. This was the impetus for the Kenyan Judiciary to introduce the Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016 (SPGs). This paper is a general commentary, critique, and analysis of the SPGs. The author argues that SPGs come at an instructive epoch in Kenya’s economic, socio-political, and cultural development. This contribution is not a polemic on the Kenyan SPGs. The commentary makes sideglances to various jurisdictions that have had a longer experience with sentencing guidelines. The article forecasts that Kenyan SPGs will, despite its few shortcomings, nevertheless, prove to be important for all judicial officers involved in Kenya’s criminal justice system.
23
Mohamad, Ani Munirah, Zaiton Hamin, Mohd Zakhiri Md Nor, Saslina Kamaruddin, and Mohd Shahril Nizam Md Radzi. "The Implications of Audio/Video Conference Systems on the Administration of Justice at the Malaysian Courts." Webology 17, no. 2 (December 21, 2020): 904–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.14704/web/v17i2/web17076.
Full textAbstract:
The audio/video conference systems (AVS) enable parties from distinct locations to „meet‟ synchronously in achieving certain objectives. Medical practitioners, accounting firms, businessmen, to name a few, have long resorted to AVS in their everyday routines. Recently, the courts in many parts of the world, including the Malaysian courts, have started to engage in AVS in solving any disputes. Despite this development, local literature is still scarce on this subject matter, and the adoption of AVS is rather recent in the Malaysian context. Hence, this paper seeks to highlight the implications of such technologies, particularly in enhancing the administration of justice at the Malaysian Courts. The study adopts a qualitative method, engaging in two multiple-embedded case studies involving a High Court in West Malaysia and a High Court in East Malaysia using the instrument of semi-structured interviews. The data generated from the case studies were analysed using the computer-aided qualitative data analysis software ATLAS.ti version 8.4. The study found that there is a huge potential for the Malaysian courts to adopt AVS in solving any disputes, as it would significantly save time, money and resources. Most importantly, AVS is proven to improve people‟s access to justice, particularly those in the rural areas. On the other hand, the engagement of the AVS system also posed some challenges such as enhancement of cost and training requirements for the court personnel as well as for the solicitors. Additionally, there seems to be an inadequate regulatory framework to govern the use of AVS at the Malaysian courts. The significance of this study is that it would assist the courts and the Malaysian Bar in appreciating the implications of the AVS on the administration of justice at the Malaysian Courts. Hence, proper guidelines should be in place for users of AVS for proper usage at the courts. Also, this paper would contribute to the body of local literature on ICT adoption at the courts, in particular on the AVS usage.
24
Ishimaru, Ann M. "Re-imagining turnaround: families and communities leading educational justice." Journal of Educational Administration 56, no. 5 (August 6, 2018): 546–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jea-01-2018-0013.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of how minoritized families and communities contribute to equity-focused school change, not as individual consumers or beneficiaries, but as educational and community leaders working collectively to transform their schools. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative case study examines one poverty-impacted racially diverse high school in the US West and the changes that occurred over a seven-year period. Findings Minoritized families, community leaders and formal leaders leveraged conventional schooling structures – such as turnaround reforms, the International Baccalaureate program and the PTA – to disrupt the default institutional scripts of schools and drive equity-focused change for all students, particularly African-Americans from the neighborhood. Research limitations/implications Though one school, this case contributes insights about how families and communities can collaborate with systems actors to catalyze educational justice in gentrifying communities. Practical implications This study suggests strategies that families and communities used to reclaim school narratives, “infiltrate” conventional structures and reorient them toward equitable collaboration and educational justice. Social implications This study contributes to a body of critical scholarship on “turnaround” reform efforts in urban secondary schools and suggests ways to reshape decision making, leadership, parent engagement and student intervention to build collective agency. Originality/value This research raises provocative questions about the extent to which families and communities can use conventional structures and policies to pursue educational justice in the US public education. Learning from such efforts highlights strategies and practices that might begin to help us construct more decolonizing theories of change.
25
Olii, Masri. "Principles of Justice, Conference and Legal Accountability in Divorce Rules." International Journal of Nusantara Islam 8, no. 2 (December 15, 2020): 282–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v8i2.12408.
Full textAbstract:
The Religious Courts, in the last decade (since 2005) or since the implementation of the one roof system of judiciary, have made various improvements in the administration of justice to support efforts to reform the judiciary based on the principles of transparency and accessibility for all. the justice seeker. The Religious Courts are trying to reform several sub-systems in the judicial system that have so far not reflected equal access for justice seekers as well as protection or partiality for the rights and legal access of women, children, and the poor. The results of this study indicate that: the religious court is a place to seek justice and resolve Islamic family law problems, so in providing services to the community, it has the main task of providing fair and humane treatment to justice seekers, providing sympathetic services and assistance needed for justice seekers, and provide effective, efficient, thorough and final settlement of cases so as to satisfy the public.
26
Vereshchagina, A. V., and M. E. Omelyanenko. "Institutionalization of Justice in the Provisions of Russskaya Pravda (Russian Justice)." Actual Problems of Russian Law 15, no. 1 (February 20, 2020): 11–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.110.1.011-023.
Full textAbstract:
The phenomenon of Russskaya Pravda (Russian Justice) has been the subject of numerous studies. However, until now there has not been any exhaustively complete description of the judicial system of Ancient Russia due to scarcity of authentic sources.An analysis of the provisions of the most well-known copies of Russkaya Pravda (Russian Justice) and available research have resulted in making a number of statements.The system of justice in Ancient Russia was multisystematic in character and consisted of 4 relatively independent systems: communal, patrimonial, ecclesiastical and princely. The system under consideration had developed as a result of preservation of tribal elements and social stratification, active political genesis and Christianization. The organization of government, including the judicial system, was based on the principle of suzerainty-vassalage, i.e. the persons involved in the administration of justice were servants of the Prince who delegated judicial power to them. The competence of judicial officials was diversified according to the subject matter, territorial and personal criteria. In the system of powers of judicial officials, the powers to charge fees and fines and to impose penalties were the most important. Under Russkaya Pravda (Russian Justice) the system of judicial officials represents a kind of matrix underlying the subsequent institutionalization of judicial bodies.The complex of powers of officials dealing with pre-trial preparation of cases and enforcement of judgments proves that, despite the unity of the procedure for resolving all types of “grievances,” the law-maker distinguished civil and criminal disputes.
27
Bierwagen, Rainer Michael, and Chris Maina Peter. "Administration of Justice in Tanzania and Zanzibar: A Comparison of Two Judicial Systems in one Country." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38, no. 2 (April 1989): 395–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/38.2.395.
Full text
28
Damanik, Eva Setiarini. "Pengaruh Sistem Administrasi Modern, Keadilan, Akuntabilitas, dan Sanksi Perpajakan terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak UMKM Kota Jambi." Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business 5, no. 1 (March 18, 2021): 303. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v5i1.326.
Full textAbstract:
This study aims to examine the effect of the modern administration system, justice, accountability, and tax sanctions on the tax compliance of the MSMEs of the City of Jambi. This study uses a simple random sampling method with 100 UMKM taxpayer respondents in the city of Jambi. Data collection techniques in this study were in the form of questionnaires. The analysis used is multiple linear regression analysis using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 21. The results of this study indicate that the variables of modern administrative systems, justice, accountability, and tax sanctions affect the compliance of MSME taxpayers.
29
Sakhniuk, V. "Subjects of public administration through the system of free legal aid: general theoretical aspect." Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no. 5 (December 30, 2022): 306–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.05.57.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the powers of public administration subjects through the system of free legal aid. It was established that public administration is performed by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and the Coordination Center. The place of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine in the management system of the free legal aid system is characterized. It has been proven that the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine possesses general managerial competence, which is manifested in the rule-making and organizational-regulatory powers regarding the system of providing free legal aid. The article establishes that the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine carries out general management of the system of free legal aid, at the same time exercising organizational, law-making and normative, coordination and advisory powers in the system of ensuring the right to free legal aid.
Special attention was paid to the powers of the Coordination Center, which is a special management body and exercises powers of an organizational, coordinating, expert-analytical, informational, and controlling nature.
It was concluded that public administration through the system of free legal aid is a purposeful activity of authorized subjects aimed at ensuring the right to free legal aid.
The system of entities that carry out public administration is characterized by the following immanent features: first, it includes the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and the Coordination Center; secondly, in contrast to other systems of public administration, it is not extensive; thirdly, it includes subjects possessing general and special management competence; fourthly, the sphere of social relations in relation to which public administration is carried out is specific and includes a positive obligation of the state to ensure the right to free legal aid.
30
Malina, Maxim A. "The use of artificial intelligence in the administration of criminal justice: problems and prospects." Gosudarstvo i pravo, no. 1 (2022): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s102694520018277-5.
Full textAbstract:
The article explores the problems of using digital technologies in the administration of criminal justice. The conclusion is justified that in evidence artificial intelligence can be used to a very limited extent - only to control the admissibility of evidence. Consideration is being given to the possibility of using digital software systems to qualify the act committed by the accused. The erroneous approach is justified, according to which artificial intelligence can take part in the sentencing of the defendant. As the main direction for the use of information technologies in criminal proceedings, the solution of the tasks of optimizing hardware and technical, organizational, documentary and other routine processes, as well as work to eliminate errors of a legal and technical nature, is determined
31
Nugroho, Wahyu. "INTERACTIONS BETWEEN LEGAL SYSTEMS IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS OF KENDENG CASE (A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE)." Diponegoro Law Review 3, no. 1 (August 31, 2018): 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.3.1.2018.15-27.
Full textAbstract:
The Indonesian state has the characteristic of legal system plurality in a national legal system, it is interesting to be observed from law making, licencing, law implementation, to judiciary process. State organizers in the context of government (executive power) as the licensors of business activities and the judiciary (judicial power) State Administration, as absolute competence over the objects of environmental administration disputes require optical and comprehensive holistic understanding, amidst the very diverse conditions of the legal system (legal pluralism) and a pluralistic society to be bound in a single national legal system (unification). The problem formulation in this paper is: (1) How is the interaction of continental European legal system and customary law system on kendeng case in the tiered judicial process? And (2) how does the interaction affect the legal system on the judge's mindset over environmental permit disputes objects? In relation to executive power as a licensor, the involvement of the public in the process of publishing environmental documents becomes a very important matter. Kendeng Community of Rembang Regency Central Java Province is fighting for its rights and various access to justice, finally choosing the judicial route as the main tool against the state, namely the State Administrative Court (PTUN) Semarang, High Administrative Court (PT TUN) Surabaya, Until the most recent legal remedy in the judicial system in Indonesia, namely the Review Supreme of Court. In this paper, it shows the interaction between the legal system, the continental European legal system and the customary law system in the process of tiered justice as an access to justice for the kendeng mountain community.
32
Azmi, Anna, Yen Dee Ang, and Siti Aqilah Talib. "Trust and justice in the adoption of a welfare e-payment system." Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 10, no. 3 (August 15, 2016): 391–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tg-09-2015-0037.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the interaction between citizens’ perception of justice and their trust in the government agency that provides e-services, in particular, those e-services with users who are particularly sensitive towards their interaction and exchanges with the government. Design/methodology/approach Analysis of 102 surveys completed by users of e-BR1M was conducted. Partial least squares regression, a form of structural equation modelling, was used for the data analysis. Findings This study found that distributive justice and procedural justice positively influence trust in government. Trust in government and convenience were also found to significantly influence the adoption of e-BR1M. Research limitations/implications Understanding the interaction between perceptions of justice (procedural and distributive justice) and trust can contribute to the willingness to adopt e-government services by a particular group of users who are particularly sensitive towards interactions with the government. Practical implications Findings from this study can help policymakers improve the way in which they interact with citizens so that the citizens’ perceptions of procedural and distributive justice are improved. This, in turn, will improve trust in government and will lead to an improved willingness of citizens to use e-government services. Originality/value This study examined the interaction between citizens’ perceptions of trust and justice in an e-government service, which users are particularly sensitive towards in their interactions with the government.
33
Kasuri, Muhammad Ramzan, Ata Ullah Khan Mahmood, and Ghufran Ahmed. "Proactive Role of Public Prosecutors in the Administration of Criminal Justice: A Way Forward for Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review VI, no. II (June 30, 2021): 27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2021(vi-ii).05.
Full textAbstract:
The public prosecution service is an inevitable feature of the Criminal Justice System (CJS). A key position is assigned to the public prosecutor in the administration of the CJS, who exercises considerable powers and responsibilities, who acts with independence, impartiality, and integrity. In present era, neither the rule of law can be upheld, nor can the human rights be protected without effective role of prosecution services that has become one of the essential pillars of the CJS, an essential component of the Rule of Law,powerful center having a lot of authorities and center of attraction. The world is moving towards a prosecutorial justice system. With the help of comparative and qualitative research methodology, this article aimed to analyze the role and function of the public prosecutor in the CJS of different legal systems that enable us to revamp our system in the right direction for making it efficient expeditious, and cost-effective.
34
Peprah, Emmanuel Oppong. "THE IMPACT OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS ON EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: THE MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE." Business Excellence and Management 10, no. 4 (December 15, 2020): 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24818/beman/2020.10.4-01.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – This paper investigates the impact that High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) have on Employee Engagement and the moderating effect of Organizational Justice on this relationship. Research methodology – By the usage of a quantitative research method, data gathered from 251 employees of Professional Service firms are analysed with SPSS. Findings – This study found that there is a positive relationship between HPWS and Employee Engagement. It also found that Organizational Justice moderates the relationship between the two. Research limitations – Data was only gathered at the employee level making the interpretation of HPWS to be how employees perceive it. Hence a further study at the firm level as well as cross-sectional analyses will be needed in the future. Practical implications – Management of firms should avoid a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach in the administration of HR policies and should rather encourage tailor-made treatment for individual employees of the firm. Unfairness is encouraged if the firm is after employee engagement. Originality/Value – This study is one of the first to investigate the moderating effect of organizational justice on the relationship between HPWS and employee engagement and the first to advice firm managers to be unfair in their dealings with individual employees
35
Марку, Жерар, and Zherar Marku. "A SKETCH OF THE MAIN MODELS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE." Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 1, no. 5 (December 2, 2015): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/16130.
Full textAbstract:
Administrative justice exists in most countries as a function in the State organization. But its scope and its forms differ widely among countries, in particular as regards the place of judicial review and the powers of judges. We can sort out three main models of administrative justice, based on judicial review institutions, from historical experience and main national systems. In Europe, the European Court of Human Rights had a significant influence on the evolution of administrative justice towards more judicial oversight upon administrative bodies. The expansion of these models gave rise to a number of variants based on national and political context. The first model is the council of State, joining judicial review and advisory functions for the government. Initially an ancillary body it turned to be an independant supreme administrative court, with broad competence, including contracts and torts, while exercising further advisory functions. Another model is based on a unique administrative supreme court, with exclusive judicial review functions of a narrower scope, although some exceptions can be found where judicial review was transferred from a former council of State. A last model, probably most widespread nowadays, can be characterised as judicial review by the general supreme court. Institutionally there no dualism. The judiciary is also vested with judicial review of administrative authorities. Typical of common law countries, this organization can be found also in countries of administrative law. In reality, there is dualism as regards procedures, substantial law and the powers of judges in administrative matters. In numerous cases administrative courts are organised inside of ordinary courts. Whatever the form of administrative justice it is essential to secure the independence of judges, to give them the capacity of substantial review of administrative acts, to facilitate the access to administrative judges and to guarantee the execution of courts decisions.
36
Halaburda, N. A. "THE NATURE OF THE MODERNIZATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN THE ANGLO-SAXON LEGAL SYSTEM." Actual problems of native jurisprudence 5, no. 5 (October 2021): 59–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/392199.
Full textAbstract:
The main goal of the study is to determine the nature and features of the Anglo-Saxon legal system, the nature of the impact of common law principles, to clarify the legal status of UK tribunals, and highlight the main advantages and disadvantages of administrative tribunals compared to general courts. Unlike continental legal systems, Anglo-Saxon law emphasizes the procedural, pragmatic side of its operation. In the studied legal system there are several positions on the understanding of the concept of “administrative justice”: first, it is the existing procedure for appealing against decisions and actions of public administration and officials in court, i. e. a special type of judicial activity; secondly, it is the activity of tribunals as quasi-judicial bodies. In addition, many countries belonging to the Anglo-Saxon legal family have the principle of mandatory prior (pretrial) recourse to administrative justice disputes. Only after consideration of the pre-trial appeal by the authorized quasijudicial bodies is it possible to open the procedure in the general court. The Anglo-Saxon system of administrative justice is based on the doctrine of equality of all officials before the courts and the prevention of the removal of officials from the jurisdiction of the same courts that other citizens deal with. An analysis of the administrative justice of Great Britain (Anglo-Saxon version) allows us to conclude that it operates at the junction of the executive and judicial branches of government. Administrative justice is linked to the executive branch by the fact that its bodies are in close cooperation with the active administration. Instead, it is brought closer to the judiciary by the fact that courts of general jurisdiction act as an appellate instance against decisions of administrative tribunals. The activities of these bodies are departmental in nature and, unlike the continental model of administrative justice, do not carry the principle of universal jurisdiction.
37
Effron, Judge Andrew S., and Jonathan J. Wroblewski. "Congress Reforms Military Sentencing, Creating an Opportunity for a Productive Sentencing Reform Dialogue Between the Military and Civilian Criminal Justice Systems." Federal Sentencing Reporter 35, no. 1 (October 1, 2022): 73–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2022.35.1.73.
Full textAbstract:
In recently-enacted legislation, Congress drew upon the 35-year experience with sentencing reform in the federal civilian criminal courts to reform significant aspects of the sentencing process in the military justice system. The article reviews the sentencing reform provisions contained in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2022 and the Military Justice Act of 2016, which address many of the core elements of sentencing, including: (1) the principles governing sentencing in courts-martial; (2) the use of sentencing “parameters” and “criteria” in the adjudication of sentences by general and special courts-martial; (3) the role of the military judge in the adjudication of sentences; (4) consideration of plea agreements at the trial level; (5) appellate review of sentences; (6) clemency and related actions on the sentence, and more. After summarizing the history of military and civilian sentencing, the article reviews the newly-enacted military justice sentencing provisions, comparing them to the relevant provisions in the federal civilian sentencing system that were enacted as part of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and subsequent legislation, and implemented by the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Although some of these newly-enacted reforms mirror similar elements of the federal civilian sentencing system, others follow a different approach, reflecting a decision by Congress to adapt rather than simply adopt current civilian practices. As Congress, the Administration, and a new Sentencing Commission focus on criminal justice reform, including possible changes to civilian sentencing law and policy, the recent reforms in military justice sentencing provide an important source of insights worthy of consideration.
38
Hess, Burkhard. "The Brussels I Regulation: Recent case law of the Court of Justice and the Commissions proposed recast." Common Market Law Review 49, Issue 3 (June 1, 2012): 1075–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/cola2012039.
Full textAbstract:
The European law of civil procedure is a steady process of evolution and improvement. Marked by growing cooperation between the civil courts of EU Member States, this area of law is now increasingly dominated by judicial competition and by constitutional influences: on the one hand, the judicial systems of the Member States aspire to attract litigation of high value (often by plaintiff-oriented rules), and on the other hand, the European Court of Justice elaborates its case law on the principles of access to justice, free movement of judgments and fair trial in cross-border litigation. At present, the reform of the Brussels I Regulation (Reg. 44/2001) is on the legislative agenda. The main task of the European law-makers is to update the Regulation in order to maintain the sound administration of justice within the European Judicial Area by limiting competition between national judicial systems which does not necessarily correspond to the interests of private litigants. This article describes the ECJ's case law and takes stock of the present state of affairs for the Brussels I Regulation which is the cornerstone of the European law of civil procedure.
39
Wyatt, Neal, Richard A. Stoddart, Brett Spencer, and Adrienne R. McPhaul. "A Select Survey of Criminal Justice Administration and Criminology Resources for Research, Reference, and Collection Development." Reference & User Services Quarterly 48, no. 1 (September 1, 2008): 13–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.48n1.13.
Full text
40
Fernandes, Edesio. "Extrajudicial Execution of Children: Shortcomings of Social Citizenship and the Fallacy of Criminal Justice in Brazil." Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 12, no. 2 (June 1994): 117–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016934419401200202.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes some of the implications of the phenomenon of extrajudicial execution on ‘street children’ in Brazil. Following the presentation of basic information on the subject, as related to the general panorama of human rights violations in Brazil, the author looks for its immediate causes in the country's broader socio-economic and political reality. The killing of children exposes structural inequalities and injustices which result from the socio-economic conditions of wealth distribution in Brazil and from its political system. The phenomenon is analyzed in the context of Brazil's state system of social control and distribution of justice. The killings of children – and the impunity of the perpetrators – are facilitated by the distortions of the systems of police administration, criminal justice and community care.
41
Hänska, Max. "Normative Analysis in the Communications Field: Why We Should Distinguish Communicative Means and Ends of Justice." Journal of Information Policy 9, no. 1 (December 1, 2019): 56–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.9.1.0056.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In the social sciences, we often face normative questions, not least because many areas of inquiry intersect with public policy. Understanding and explaining media and communications is one task, deciding how communication systems should be organized quite another, but normative analysis receives scant attention. This article explores normative analysis: what is involved in answering questions about justice and communication, about how sociopolitical and indeed communicative arrangements ought to be organized.
42
Boske, Christa, and Chinasa Elue. "“Hold on! I’ll Just Google It!”: Critical Conversations Regarding Dimensions of Diversity in a School Leadership Preparation Program." Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership 21, no. 1 (January 30, 2018): 78–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1555458917712547.
Full textAbstract:
This case outlines a dilemma encountered by faculty and graduate assistants in a K-12 educational administration graduate program. The case offers a detailed illustration of tensions arising when faculty were asked to increase “diversity” within their program. Faculty uncover disrupting institutional systems of domination that often play a significant role in understanding how to prepare leaders to serve in authentic and meaningful ways. Implications for the development of social justice–oriented school leaders included an intentional examination of these issues.
43
Matyas, David, Peter Wills, and Barry Dewitt. "Imagining Resilient Courts: from COVID-19 to the Future of Canada’s Court System." Canadian Public Policy 48, no. 1 (March 1, 2022): 186–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2021-015.
Full textAbstract:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged an array of democratic institutions in complex and unprecedented ways. Little academic work, however, has considered the pandemic’s impact on Canada’s courts. This article aims to partially fill that gap by exploring the Canadian court system’s response to COVID-19 and the prospects for administering justice amid disasters, all through the lens of resilience. After taking a forensic look at how the court system has managed the challenges brought on by COVID-19, we argue that features of resilience such as self-organization, flexibility, learning, and reflexive planning can contribute to the administration of justice during future shocks. We propose that the business of judging during shocks can become more integral to the business as usual of court systems. Imagining such a resilient court can be a way to step from COVID-19 to the future of Canada’s court system.
44
Contini, Francesco. "Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings." Law, Technology and Humans 2, no. 1 (May 8, 2020): 4–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v2i1.1478.
Full textAbstract:
The paper connects the potentially disruptive effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) deployment in the administration of justice to the pre-existing trajectories and consequences of court technology development. The theoretical framework combines Luhmann’s theory of technology with actor–network theory to analyse how the new digital environment affects judicial agency. Then, it explores law and technology dynamics to map out the conditions that make legal the use of technologies in judicial proceedings. The framework is applied to analyse ‘traditional’ digital technologies (simple online forms and large-scale e-justice platforms) and AI-based systems (speech-to-text and recidivism assessment). The case comparison shows similarities and dynamics triggered by AI and traditional technologies, as well as a radical difference. While system developers and owners remain accountable before the law for the functioning of traditional systems, with AI, such accountability is transferred to users. Judges—users in general—remain accountable for the consequences of their actions supported or suggested by systems that are opaque and autonomous. This contingency, if not adequately faced with new forms of accountability, restricts the areas in which AI can be used without hampering judicial integrity.
45
Okhremtchouk, Irina, Caroline Turner, and Patrick Newell. "Introduction: Striving for social justice and equity in higher education." education policy analysis archives 29 (March 29, 2021): 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5154.
Full textAbstract:
Through the introduction of our special issue, Striving for Social Justice and Equity in Higher Education, we aim to add to a continued and much-needed discussion on deeply seated institutional inequities that remain to shape the ways by which education occurs across the higher education landscape. As we present manuscripts included in this issue, our goal is to capture the vast and many layers within higher education encompassing research and discussions on policy and systems that impact administration, leadership, faculty, and student experiences. In our concluding remarks, we stress that even though deeply seated institutional inequities remain, the work of this type must continue as it is part of a broader fight waged for social and racial justice. It is our hope that institutional leaders and policymakers will use the wealth of knowledge shared in this special issue to cultivate nurturing learning environments that include and value the talent and perspectives of those who have been systematically undervalued and marginalized.
46
Peeters, Rik, and Marc Schuilenburg. "Machine justice: Governing security through the bureaucracy of algorithms." Information Polity 23, no. 3 (August 20, 2018): 267–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ip-180074.
Full text
47
Choenni, Sunil, Jan van Dijk, and Frans Leeuw. "Preserving privacy whilst integrating data: Applied to criminal justice." Information Polity 15, no. 1,2 (August 4, 2010): 125–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ip-2010-0202.
Full text
48
Satirah Wan Mohd Saman, Wan, and Abrar Haider. "E‐Shariah in Malaysia: technology adoption within justice system." Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 7, no. 2 (May 24, 2013): 256–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506161311325396.
Full text
49
Ahmed, Rozha Kamal, Khder Hassan Muhammed, Ingrid Pappel, and Dirk Draheim. "Impact of e-court systems implementation: a case study." Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 15, no. 1 (January 25, 2021): 108–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tg-01-2020-0008.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose E-court systems automate court processes and provide better case administration with more effective and efficient justice delivery. This paper aims to present the e-court system in the Sulaimaniyah Appellate Court in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq as a case study. It identifies significant improvements after adopting the system. Design/methodology/approach This study used a qualitative approach with an exploratory case study design. Data collected from a triangulation of three sources through structured expert interviews with 30 stakeholders, personal observations by two of the authors, supported by analyzing current relevant literature. R package for Qualitative Data Analysis was the analysis tool. Findings Findings showed 10 improvements that enhanced court efficiency and effectiveness concerning better case administration, a more transparent process and increased court case security. Research limitations/implications This research is limited to improvements after adopting an e-court system. Practical implications This research provides a foundation for practitioners who are on the way to implement the e-court system and serves the decision-makers in the Kurdistan Regional Government to plan future expansion in the region. Originality/value This research focuses on the e-court system in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. It is implemented as a first e-service to be a pilot for a broader plan to integrate all appellate courts in other cities in the Kurdistan of Iraq, hence, stepping toward the implementation of e-government.
50
Pietras-Eichberger, Marta. "Evolution of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Law of the European Union – considerations in the context of the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice." Gubernaculum et Administratio 1(25) (2022): 169–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.16926/gea.2022.01.11.
Full textAbstract:
Interest in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a relatively recent development in the EU. In the broadest sense ADR is an alternative to the entire administration of justice by courts of law. This paper focusses on the selected aspects of alternative dispute resolution in the context of the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice. This paper claims that in the EU a new, integrated system of alternative dispute resolution is being formed based on a uniform set of rules that influences the evolution and development of mediations in Member States independently of the Member States’ previous experiences in this field. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to analyse not only EU laws, but also rulings of the Court of Justice which are still scarce in this respect. However, CJ rulings provide guidance on the interpretation of issues that are new to Member States, and that led to certain infringements in the initial period of implementation of the EU law in the area concerned.