Academic literature on the topic 'Justice, Administration of Australia'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Justice, Administration of Australia.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Justice, Administration of Australia"
O’Brien, Wendy, and Kate Fitz-Gibbon. "Can Human Rights Standards Counter Australia’s Punitive Youth Justice Practices?" International Journal of Children’s Rights 26, no. 2 (May 3, 2018): 197–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02602004.
Full textJiang, Zhou. "The relationship between justice and commitment: the moderation of trust." Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration 7, no. 1 (April 7, 2015): 73–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/apjba-02-2014-0022.
Full textStewart, Pamela, and Anita Stuhmcke. "Open Justice, Efficient Justice and the Rule of Law: The Increasing Invisibility of Special Leave to Appeal Applications in the High Court of Australia." Federal Law Review 48, no. 2 (March 3, 2020): 186–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0067205x20906031.
Full textGOODIN, ROBERT E. "Temporal Justice." Journal of Social Policy 39, no. 1 (September 18, 2009): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0047279409990225.
Full textRipoll González, Laura, and Fred Gale. "Place Branding as Participatory Governance? An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Tasmania, Australia." SAGE Open 10, no. 2 (April 2020): 215824402092336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244020923368.
Full textHumphrys, Elizabeth. "Global Justice Organising in Australia: Crisis and Realignment after 9/11." Globalizations 10, no. 3 (June 2013): 451–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.787772.
Full textRogers, Owen. "‘I beg to differ’: Are our courts too agreeable?" South African Law Journal 139, no. 2 (2022): 300–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/salj/v139/i2a4.
Full textHogg, Russell. "‘Only a pawn in their game’: crime, risk and politics in the case of Robert Fardon." International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 3, no. 3 (December 1, 2014): 55–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v3i3.152.
Full textMulyono, Mulyono, Manotar Tampubolon, and Serirama Butarbutar. "Perbandingan Penyelesaian Keberatan dan Banding Pajak di Amerika Serikat, Australia dan Indonesia." Jurnal Syntax Admiration 5, no. 7 (July 16, 2024): 2825–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i7.1215.
Full textVilchyk, Tetyana. "DUTIES OF A LAWYER TO A COURT AND TO A CLIENT." Russian Law Journal 6, no. 4 (November 1, 2018): 62–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2018-6-4-62-99.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Justice, Administration of Australia"
Cockram, Judith. "Justice or differential treatment? : Adult offenders with an intellectual disability in the criminal justice system." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 2000. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1532.
Full textRochow, Neville Grant. "Evidence, judicial notice and party comment: principles for ascertaining facts which predicate constitutional validity." Title page, contents and abstract only, 1987. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09LM/09lmr781.pdf.
Full textBolitho, Jane Johnman Social Science & Policy UNSW. "Creating space for young people, dialogue and decision making : youth justice conferencing in New South Wales Australia." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. Social Science and Policy, 2005. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/20780.
Full textMcKillop, Dianne R. "Principles in public reasoning about criminal justice : victim vulnerability, trust, and offender status." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 2001. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1035.
Full textArmstrong, Gillian Claire. "Administrative justice and tribunals in South Africa : a commonwealth comparison." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/17997.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: In the field of administrative law, the judiciary has traditionally exercised control over the administrative actions of the executive through judicial review. However, judicial review is neither the most effective nor the most efficient primary control mechanism for systemic administrative improvement. In a country faced with a task of =transformative constitutionalism‘, and hindered with scarce resources, there is good cause to limit judicial intervention as the first response to administrative disputes. The major theme of this thesis is to investigate the feasibility of administrative tribunal reform in South Africa, using two other commonwealth countries, Australia and England, as a basis for comparison. Australia and England have been chosen for comparison because they share similar administrative law traditions and they can provide working models of coherent tribunal structures. The Australian tribunal system is well-established and consists of tribunals which fall under the control of the executive, while tribunals in England have recently undergone a significant transformation, and are now part of the independent judiciary. The South African government currently spends, indeed wastes, a significant amount of money on administrative law litigation. Due to the limitations of judicial review, even after the high costs of litigation and the long duration of court proceedings, the results achieved may still be unsatisfactory. Furthermore, judicial review is unsuited to giving effect to systemic administrative change and the improvement of initial decision-making. Australia and England have begun to move away from the traditional court model for the resolution of administrative disputes. Both have indicated a preference for the important role of tribunals in the administration of disputes. Tribunals have been shown to offer the advantage of being speedier, cheaper, more efficient, more participatory and more accessible than traditional courts, which contributes to tribunals being a more available resource for lay people or people without sophisticated legal knowledge, and provides wider access to remedies than courts. The English and Australian models indicate a few important trends which need to be applied universally to ensure a sustained tribunal reform and a system which provides a higher level of administrative redress than the over-burdened and institutionally inept courts currently do. These include co-operation among government departments and tribunals; open and accountable systemic change; the need for supervision and evaluation of the whole of administrative law by an independent and competent body; and ultimately a focus on the needs of users of state services. At the same time, there are arguments against administrative tribunal reform. These include the costs of reform; the ways to establish tribunals; and the level of independence shown by the tribunals. These arguments are especially relevant in the South African context, where the government faces huge social problems and a scarcity of resources. However, after an analysis of the valuable characteristics of tribunals and the role that they serve in the day to day administration of justice, it is difficult to see how these objections to tribunals can outweigh their potential importance in the administrative justice system. The need for sustained systematic reform in South Africa is one that cannot be ignored. Tribunals offer a valuable alternative to judicial review for the resolution of administrative disputes. Furthermore, the tribunal systems of Australia and England demonstrate how the effective creation and continued use of comprehensive tribunal structures contributes firstly to cost reduction and secondly to ease the administrative burden on courts who are not suited to cure large-scale administrative error.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In die administratiefreg oefen die regsprekende gesag tradisioneel beheer uit oor die uitvoerende gesag deur middel van geregtelike hersiening. Geregtelike hersiening is egter nie die mees doeltreffende of effektiewe primêre beheermeganisme om sistemiese administratiewe verbetering teweeg te bring nie. In 'n land met die uitdagings van 'transformatiewe konstitusionalisme‘ en skaars hulpbronne, kan 'n goeie argument gevoer word dat geregtelike inmenging as die eerste antwoord op administratiewe dispute beperk moet word. Die deurlopende tema van hierdie tesis is 'n ondersoek na die lewensvatbaarheid van hervorming van administratiewe tribunale in Suid-Afrika, in vergelyking met die posisie in Australië en Engeland, waarvan beide ook, tesame met Suid-Afrika, deel vorm van die Statebond. Hierdie lande is gekies vir regsvergelykende studie aangesien hulle 'n administratiefregtelike tradisie met Suid-Afrika deel en beide werkende modelle van duidelike tribunale strukture daarstel. Die Australiese tribunale stelsel is goed gevestig en bestaan uit tribunale onder die beheer van die uitvoerende gesag, terwyl die tribunale stelsel in Engeland onlangs 'n beduidende hervorming ondergaan het en nou deel van die onafhanklike regsprekende gesag is. Die Suid-Afrikaanse regering mors aansienlike hoeveelhede geld op administratiefregtelike litigasie. Selfs na hoë koste en lang vertragings van litigasie mag die resultate steeds onbevredigend wees as gevolg van die beperkings inherent aan geregtelike hersiening. Tesame met hierdie oorwegings is geregtelike hersiening ook nie gerig op sistemiese administratiewe verandering en verbetering van aanvanklike besluitneming nie. Australië en Engeland het onlangs begin wegbeweeg van die tradisionele hof-gebaseerde model vir die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Beide toon 'n voorkeur vir die belangrike rol wat tribunale in die administrasie van dispute kan speel Tribunale bied die bewese voordele om vinniger, goedkoper, meer doeltreffend, meer deelnemend en meer toeganklik te wees as tradisionele howe, sodat tribunale 'n meer beskikbare hulpbron is vir leke, oftewel, persone sonder gesofistikeerde regskennis en dus beter toegang tot remedies as tradisionele howe verskaf. Die Engelse en Australiese modelle dui op enkele belangrike tendense wat universeel toegepas moet word om volgehoue tribunale hervorming te verseker en om =n stelsel te skep wat 'n hoër vlak van administratiewe geregtigheid daarstel as wat oorlaaide en institusioneel onbekwame howe kan. Dit verwys bepaald na samewerking tussen staatsdepartemente en tibunale; deursigtige en verantwoordbare sistemiese veranderinge; die behoefte aan toesighouding en evaluasie van die hele administratiefreg deur 'n onafhanklike, bevoegde liggaam; en uiteindelik 'n fokus op die behoeftes van die gebruikers van staatsdienste. Daar is egter terselfdertyd ook argumente teen administratiewe tribunale hervorming. Hierdie argumente sluit in die koste van hervorming; die wyses waarop tribunale gevestig word; en die vlak van onafhanklikheid voorgehou deur tribunale. Hierdie argumente is veral relevant in die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks waar die regering voor groot sosiale probleme te staan kom en daarby ingesluit, 'n tekort aan hulpbronne ook moet hanteer. Daarenteen is dit moeilik om in te sien hoe enige teenkanting en teenargumente met betrekking tot die vestiging van administratiewe tribunale swaarder kan weeg as die potensiële belang van sulke tribunale in die administratiewe geregtigheidstelsel, veral nadat 'n analise van die waardevolle karaktereienskappe van tribunale en die rol wat hulle speel in die dag-tot-dag administrasie van geregtigheid onderneem is. Die behoefte aan volhoubare sistemiese hervorming in Suid-Afrika kan nie geïgnoreer word nie. Tribunale bied 'n waardevolle alternatief tot geregtelike hersiening met die oog op die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Tesame hiermee demonstreer die tribunale stelsels in Australië en Engeland hoe die doeltreffende vestiging en deurlopende gebruik van omvattende tribunale bydra, eerstens om kostes verbonde aan die oplossing van administratiewe dispute te verlaag en tweedens, om die administratiewe las op die howe, wat nie aangelê is daarvoor om grootskaalse administratiewe foute reg te stel nie, te verlig.
Downe, Kristy. "Exploration of perceptions of justice amongst secondary victims of sexual crime." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 2007. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/256.
Full textBedells, Stephen J. "Incarcerating Indigenous people of the Wongatha lands in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia : Indigenous leaders’ perspectives." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 2010. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/137.
Full textAskam, Tina. "A study of walking and walkability through a spatial justice/spatial practice framework, in Maylands, Western Australia." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 2017. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1966.
Full textWright, Jodie S. "Sentencing decisions : the public view of the effects of consequences of crime, offender remorse and type of crime." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 2001. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1069.
Full textCalvey, Jo. "Women's experiences of the workers' compensation system in Queensland, Australia." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 2002. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/731.
Full textBooks on the topic "Justice, Administration of Australia"
Keith, Bryett, ed. Criminal justice in Australia. Sydney: Butterworths, 1993.
Find full text1955-, Neuhaus Debbie, and Walker John R, eds. Crime and justice in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 1990.
Find full textBrown, Graham. Legal studies for South Australia. Sydney: Butterworths, 1994.
Find full textDavidson, Alastair. Rights, justice, and democracy in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire, 1991.
Find full textMukherjee, Satyanshu Kumar. Juvenile crime and justice: Australia, 1997. Griffith, A.C.T: Australian Institute of Criminology, 1997.
Find full textStephen, Odgers, and Yeo Stanley Meng Heong, eds. Australian criminal justice. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Find full textStephen, Odgers, and Yeo Stanley Meng Heong, eds. Australian criminal justice. 3rd ed. South Melbourne, Vic., Australia: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Find full textRachel, Aalders, and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare., eds. Juvenile justice in Australia 2006-07. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2008.
Find full textRachel, Aalders, and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare., eds. Juvenile justice in Australia 2007-08. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2009.
Find full textLoke, Kit. Juvenile justice in Australia 2004-05. Canberra, A.C.T: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2007.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Justice, Administration of Australia"
McAllister, Ian, Malcolm Mackerras, and Carolyn Brown Boldiston. "Administration of justice." In Australian Political facts, 403–35. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15196-7_9.
Full textOwusu-Bempah, Akwasi, and Shaun L. Gabbidon. "Australia." In Race, Ethnicity, Crime, and Justice, 126–53. 2nd edition. | New York, NY: Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315686400-5.
Full textSpann, R. N. "Australia." In Education and Research in Public Administration in Africa, 355–80. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003451389-25.
Full textStout, Brian. "Community justice." In Community Justice in Australia, 5–26. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003193814-2.
Full textStout, Brian. "Juvenile justice." In Community Justice in Australia, 43–62. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003193814-4.
Full textStout, Brian. "Restorative justice." In Community Justice in Australia, 80–96. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003193814-6.
Full textButler, David, and Gareth Butler. "Administration of Justice." In British Political Facts 1900–1985, 307–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18083-7_8.
Full textO’Halloran, Kerry. "Australia." In Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 409–49. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9777-1_10.
Full textO’Halloran, Kerry. "Australia." In Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 371–427. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97648-4_8.
Full textO’Halloran, Kerry. "Australia." In Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 445–93. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65588-4_10.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Justice, Administration of Australia"
Dozier, Reagen. "California Community College Faculty Perspectives on Criminal Justice/Administration of Justice Programs." In 2021 AERA Annual Meeting. Washington DC: AERA, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1715006.
Full textBegel'dieva, D. N. "Legality and fairness in the administration of justice." In SCIENCE OF RUSSIA: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. L-Journal, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/sr-10-02-2021-61.
Full textRiega-Viru, Yasmina, Mario Ninaquispe Soto, Juan Luis Salas-Riega, and Joselyn Arellano Arizola Bach. "Expert systems and administration of justice in Peru and Brazil." In 2022 IEEE Engineering International Research Conference (EIRCON). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/eircon56026.2022.9934806.
Full textRiley, Sarah. "Overriding (in)justice: pretrial risk assessment administration on the frontlines." In FAccT '24: The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658920.
Full textNallasamy, Mani. "Vocational Education and Training (VET) System and Social Justice in Australia." In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tale56641.2023.10398313.
Full textRocha, Cinara Maria Carneiro, Ana Lucia Aguiar, and Joao Alvaro Carvalho. "National Brazilian judicial database (DataJud): transparency and better administration of justice." In ICEGOV 2023: 16th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3614321.3614381.
Full textArshad, Ain Husna Mohd. "Revisiting The Administration Of Family Justice In The Family Court In Malaysia." In ILC 2017 - 9th UUM International Legal Conference. Cognitive-Crcs, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.03.66.
Full textAgapova, O. "Digitalization of public administration entities in the field of justice: organizational and legal framework." In DIGITAL TRENDS AND ANTI-CORRUPTION REFORMS IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. Baltija Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-369-9-1.
Full textZeman, Jakub. "Digitalization and COVID-19 in the Justice Sector." In EDAMBA 2021 : 24th International Scientific Conference for Doctoral Students and Post-Doctoral Scholars. University of Economics in Bratislava, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53465/edamba.2021.9788022549301.560-570.
Full textPradhan, Tulishree, and Shuvro Prosun Sarker. "MEDIA TRIAL VS. FAIR TRIAL: ARE THE NEW MEDIA RESHAPING ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE?" In 4th International Scientific Conference: Knowledge based sustainable economic development. Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia et all, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.764.
Full textReports on the topic "Justice, Administration of Australia"
Rukundo, Solomon. Towards an Effective Taxpayer Complaint Handling Mechanism: The Case for a Tax Ombudsman in Uganda. Institute of Development Studies, March 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ictd.2023.010.
Full textNAVAL JUSTICE SCHOOL NEWPORT RI. Legal Office Administration. Revision (Naval Justice School). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada306548.
Full textIrwin, Douglas. Adam Smith's "Tolerable Administration of Justice" and the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w20636.
Full textBaker, Alison, and Lutfiye Ali. Mapping young people’s social justice concerns: An exploration of voice and action. Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56311/hbnb8239.
Full textMcConnell, Allan. Australia: How Has Technical and Expert Policy Advice Been Used for Rapid Response Decision-Making? Australia and New Zealand School of Government, October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.54810/xaag2908.
Full textMartinez, Monica, and Michelle Oliva. In Pursuit of Racial Equity: A Pathway for Action and Transformation in Education. EduDream, February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.62137/babg2923.
Full textAllen, Barbara. How Effective Have Localised and Targeted Community Actions and Targeted Messaging About Policy Decisions Been? Australia and New Zealand School of Government, October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.54810/ahcd6656.
Full textTyson, Paul. Sovereignty and Biosecurity: Can we prevent ius from disappearing into dominium? Mέta | Centre for Postcapitalist Civilisation, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.55405/mwp3en.
Full textBuchanan, Riley, Daniel Elias, Darren Holden, Daniel Baldino, Martin Drum, and Richard P. Hamilton. The archive hunter: The life and work of Leslie R. Marchant. The University of Notre Dame Australia, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.32613/reports/2021.2.
Full textJoshi, Anuradha, Jalia Kangave, and Vanessa van den Boogaard. Engendering Taxation: a Research and Policy Agenda. Institute of Development Studies, March 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ictd.2024.017.
Full text