Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Jurors'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Jurors.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Hussey, Heather Joan Catriona. "Potential jurors' perceptions of child witnesses." University of Western Australia. Centre for Forensic Science, 2009. http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2009.0151.
Full textKutys, Jennifer M. "Juror Decision Making: The Impact of Attractiveness and Socioeconomic Status on Criminal Sentencing and an Examination of Motivated Reasoning in Mock Jurors." Wright State University Professional Psychology Program / OhioLINK, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wsupsych1340655235.
Full textDeFranco, Rachel. "Witness Uncertainty and Its Effect on Jurors' Decisions." Kent State University Honors College / OhioLINK, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ksuhonors1355082776.
Full textCamilletti, Catherine Rieman. "Attorneys' and jurors' perceptions of juvenile offenders' culpability." To access this resource online via ProQuest Dissertations and Theses @ UTEP, 2008. http://0-proquest.umi.com.lib.utep.edu/login?COPT=REJTPTU0YmImSU5UPTAmVkVSPTI=&clientId=2515.
Full textHayes-Smith, Rebecca. "The CSI Effect jurors' perceptions and trial decisions /." [Gainesville, Fla.] : University of Florida, 2009. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/UFE0024794.
Full textMcDonald, Emily. "Understanding How Jurors Award Civil Damages: A Test of Affect Control Theory." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2004. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4588/.
Full textTrahan, Adam. "Don't shoot the messenger capital jurors' perceptions of attorneys /." [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University, 2009. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3380134.
Full textTitle from PDF t.p. (viewed on Jul 14, 2010). Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: 4866. Adviser: Marla R. Sandys.
Parisi, Jeanine M. "Quantifying the effects of pretrial publicity on jurors' judgments." Virtual Press, 2000. http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/1178345.
Full textDepartment of Psychological Science
Sicafuse, Lorie L. "Mock Jurors' Attributions and Attributional Processes in a Medical Malpractice Case| Examining the Influence of Plaintiff Weight, Juror Characteristics, and Deliberations." Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, 2015. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3707907.
Full textResearch suggests that most Americans harbor weight-related prejudices, which can translate into discrimination against the obese across a variety of contexts. Yet, little is known about how anti-fat bias may influence juror decisions in cases involving an obese trial participant. This study examined the main and interactive effects of plaintiff weight, deliberations, and individual differences on jurors’ decisions in a medical malpractice case. The Culpable Control Model (CCM) was used to ground the research and to help illuminate the attributional processes underlying mock jurors’ decisions.
College student mock jurors were presented with a photograph of either a normal weight or obese plaintiff and assigned to non-deliberating or deliberating conditions. After reading the case summary, non-deliberating jurors rendered case judgments independently and responded to a series of items designed to measure attributional processes in accordance with the CCM. Deliberating jurors also reviewed the case summary independently but then discussed the case in small groups; each group rendered case judgments as a jury. Following deliberations, jury group members were instructed to provide independent, “individual level” responses to the same series of items completed by the non-deliberating jurors. Several individual differences were assessed in the total sample, including belief in a just world (BJW), belief in the protestant work ethic (BPWE), and anti-fat attitudes (AFAs).
Results revealed no main effects of plaintiff weight on case-related judgments or on any of the measures of attributional processes. However, deliberations and several individual difference variables moderated the effects of plaintiff weight on the dependent variables. Contrary to expectations, deliberations appeared to exacerbate rather than attenuate the effects of anti-fat bias on jurors’ decisions. Compared to non-deliberating jurors, deliberating jurors were more likely to find the obese plaintiff responsible for the negative medical outcome and awarded fewer non-economic damages to the obese plaintiff. Numerous individual differences variables moderated the effects of plaintiff weight on the dependent variables, but BJW was the strongest, most consistent moderator. As expected, those with stronger just world beliefs were less likely to find the defendant liable and were overall more punitive toward the obese plaintiff than those with weaker beliefs. Analyses further indicated that jurors’ attributional processes were consistent with those proposed by the CCM, such that their initial reactions to the case and the plaintiff and defendant influenced their interpretation of attributional information and criteria, which in turn influenced their case decisions. Significant findings not directly tied to formally advanced hypotheses also emerged. Overall, deliberating jurors were more lenient toward the defendant than non-deliberating jurors. In addition, analyses revealed several main effects of individual difference variables on case judgments and attributional processes.
This research is limited in terms of verisimilitude and generalizability; yet, it also yields many significant findings that have thus far been undocumented in published studies. Both the contributions and limitations of this study illuminate exciting directions for future research. In particular, more research is needed to clarify how anti-fat bias may affect jurors’ in particular circumstances, how civil jurors’ decisions may be impacted by deliberations and individual differences more generally, and how the CCM can best be used to help understand decision-making in applied contexts.
Mills, Kelly. "The gay panic defense and moral disengagement in mock jurors." Thesis, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10109746.
Full textThe purpose of this study was to examine moral disengagement strategies, such as dehumanization, responsibility displacement, and victim blame, in mock juror decision making in a case involving the gay panic defense. Mock jurors with high levels of moral disengagement were expected to find the defendant guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter more often than mock jurors with low levels of moral disengagement. Mock jurors read one of two vignettes that outlined a murder case in which the defendant claimed he was provoked either by an unwanted homosexual advanced from the victim, or an attempted robbery and assault by the victim. They were then asked choose between the charges of manslaughter and murder for the defendant. It was hypothesized that the defendant using the gay panic defense would receive more findings of manslaughter than the defendant in the robbery and assault vignette. This hypothesis was not supported, as the defendant in the robbery and assault vignette received more verdicts finding him guilty of manslaughter than the defendant in the gay panic vignette. However, 57% of mock jurors still supported the use of the gay panic defense. Moral disengagement did not have a significant effect on mock juror decision making in either vignette. Mock jurors with high levels of victim blame found the defendant guilty of manslaughter more often than those with low levels of victim blame. Limitations of this study and implications for society and the legal system are discussed, and future directions for research are offered.
Vander, Veen Sarah. "Mock jurors' attitudes toward aboriginal defendants: a symbolic racism approach /." Burnaby B.C. : Simon Fraser University, 2006. http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/2688.
Full textKleinstuber, Ross. "The effects of religious affiliation on capital jurors' punitive beliefs and dispositions towards punishment." Access to citation, abstract and download form provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company; downloadable PDF file, 42 p, 2007. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1338880841&sid=14&Fmt=2&clientId=8331&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Full textBurke, Tara Michele. "The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors, are there posttrial effects?" Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/nq41410.pdf.
Full textCordero, Ashley. "The Effect Of Evidence Regarding Juvenile Competency On Jurors' Subsequent Verdicts." Thesis, Alliant International University, 2015. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3709709.
Full textHistorically, juveniles have been viewed by society as less mature and less blameworthy than adults (Scott & Grisso, 1997). Since its inception, the juvenile justice system has taken on a parenting role for juveniles and has attempted to rehabilitate juvenile offenders instead of punishing them. However, during the 1980s and 1990s, as a result of a perceived increase in violent juvenile offending, American society began to treat juveniles as adults based on the severity of their crimes (Grisso, 1997). The current study examined whether evidence regarding a juvenile’s competence to stand trial and crime committed have an effect on potential jurors’ verdicts of guilty or not guilty. This study also examined the participants’ perceptions of a juvenile’s level of responsibility based on evidence regarding competency and crime outcome. Participants consisted of members of the general public who were jury-eligible. Participants received one of four randomly assigned vignettes varying only by competency to stand trial (not mentioned, incompetent and restored, or competent) and outcome of crime (death or serious injury). After reading a given vignette, participants were asked whether they would find the juvenile guilty or not guilty. They were also asked to rate the juvenile’s level of responsibility on a scale of 1 (not at all responsible) to 5 (very responsible). This study found that a juvenile’s competence to stand trial and the results of the crime committed (injury versus death) have no effect on potential jurors’ verdicts of guilty or not guilty. The results did suggest that the participants’ perceptions of a juvenile’s level of responsibility based on evidence impacts a verdict of guilty versus not guilty. Further, a competent juvenile who was found guilty of an offense resulting in death was found highly responsible for the act. In contrast, a juvenile who was not competent and was found not guilty of an offense resulting in death was perceived to be less responsible.
Ammar, Farah N. "The "CSI effect" on jurors, criminals and the American court system." Honors in the Major Thesis, University of Central Florida, 2008. http://digital.library.ucf.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ETH/id/1057.
Full textBachelors
Health and Public Affairs
Legal Studies
Blackwell, Young Julie Anne. "Factors affecting the performance of witnesses and jurors in the courtroom." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.273941.
Full textCurley, Lee John. "Is the jury still out? : the decision making processes of jurors." Thesis, Edinburgh Napier University, 2018. http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1254168.
Full textMoore, William H. (William Harold) Carleton University Dissertation Psychology. "Effects of nullification instruction and testimony type on mock jurors' decisions." Ottawa, 1995.
Find full textDavis, John Patrick. "When jurors ignore the law and the evidence to do justice /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/9031.
Full textAlbertson, Stephanie Lynn Miller. "The influence of jurors' race on perceptions of complex scientific evidence." Access to citation, abstract and download form provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company; downloadable PDF file, 189 p, 2009. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1885755771&sid=2&Fmt=2&clientId=8331&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Full textAdrian, Robin Leslie. "Trust in courtroom participants: A question of bias in prospective jurors." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 1994. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/814.
Full textRanieri, Andrea. "The effects of sports team allegiance on jurors' perceptions of a defendant." Honors in the Major Thesis, University of Central Florida, 2012. http://digital.library.ucf.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ETH/id/606.
Full textB.S.
Bachelors
Sciences
Psychology
Nelson, Sally. "Directing jurors in England and Wales : the effect of narrativisation on comprehension." Thesis, Cardiff University, 2013. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/56293/.
Full textStoots-Fonberg, Chasity Anne. "Misguided Instructions: Do Jurors Accurately Understand the Law in Death Penalty Trials?" [Johnson City, Tenn. : East Tennessee State University], 2003. http://etd-submit.etsu.edu/etd/theses/available/etd-0220103-232646/unrestricted/Stoots-FondbergC040303f.pdf.
Full textTitle from electronic submission form. ETSU ETD database URN: etd-0220103-232646. Includes bibliographical references. Also available via Internet at the UMI web site.
Blanchard, David K. "The effects of negligence and causation information on jurors' determination of liability." PDXScholar, 1991. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/4199.
Full textSheppard, Colleen E. "Victim impact statements and perceived victim race/ethnicity effects of juror background characteristics /." Fairfax, VA : George Mason University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1920/3237.
Full textVita: p. 107. Thesis director: Jon B. Gould. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Justice, Law and Crime Policy. Title from PDF t.p. (viewed Aug. 28, 2008). Includes bibliographical references (p. 99-106). Also issued in print.
Raacke, John David. "Improving use of statistical information by jurors by reducing confusion of the inverse." Diss., Manhattan, Kan. : Kansas State University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/112.
Full textAdams, Christine M. Shea. "The Death Penalty Attitudes Scale can capital trial jurors be chosen more fairly? /." Laramie, Wyo. : University of Wyoming, 2007. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1338887131&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=18949&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Full textCunningham, Lori Ann. "Jurors' evaluations of the effect of clothing on the credibility of female attorneys." Thesis, This resource online, 1995. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-01312009-063600/.
Full textHeinsohn, Brian D. "Effects of pleading the fifth amendment on juridic decisions." Virtual Press, 1997. http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/1045623.
Full textDepartment of Psychological Science
Casteel, Richard C. "Quantifying participation while examining situational and personality variables in a jury deliberation /." Electronic version (PDF), 2007. http://dl.uncw.edu/etd/2007-1/casteelr/richardcasteel.html.
Full textSchmersal, Larissa Angelique. "Pre-existing attitides about the legal system the thirteenth juror? /." To access this resource online via ProQuest Dissertations and Theses @ UTEP, 2009. http://0-proquest.umi.com.lib.utep.edu/login?COPT=REJTPTU0YmImSU5UPTAmVkVSPTI=&clientId=2515.
Full textHiggins, Jededia. "Effects of Cinema on Juror Decision Making." ScholarWorks, 2018. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/5563.
Full textWarner, Todd C. "The impact of trivial details and interrogation pressure on jurors' evaluations of retracted confessions." Virtual Press, 2007. http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/1365526.
Full textDepartment of Psychological Science
Bransgrove, Jennifer. "The influence of expert testimony on potential jurors' perceptions of young children's testimonial credibility /." [St. Lucia, Qld.], 2003. http://www.library.uq.edu.au/pdfserve.php?image=thesisabs/absthe17042.pdf.
Full textDanielsen, Erin Michelle. "Predicting jurors' decisions : the effects of repeated expression and forewarning in civil voir dire." FIU Digital Commons, 2006. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/2713.
Full textMartire, Kristy Anne Psychology Faculty of Science UNSW. "Helping jurors to evaluate eyewitness identifications: the role of expert evidence and judicial instruction." Publisher:University of New South Wales. Psychology, 2008. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/40801.
Full textDrescher, L. Hailey. "Connecting the Circuit: Analyzing Jurors' Cognitive Gaps and Damage Awards in Patent Infringement Trials." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2013. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc271808/.
Full textGroebe, Matthew Elliot. "Behavioral mimicry in the courtroom: Predicting jurors' verdict preference from nonconscious mimicry of attorneys." Miami University / OhioLINK, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=miami1384364661.
Full textKopacki, Christopher. "EXAMINING THE CSI EFFECT AND THE INFLUENCE OF FORENSIC CRIME TELEVISION ON FUTURE JURORS." VCU Scholars Compass, 2013. http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3178.
Full textSinger, Julie A. "Jurors' emotional reactions to juvenile and adult crime the impact on attributions and sentencing /." abstract and full text PDF (free order & download UNR users only), 2008. http://0-gateway.proquest.com.innopac.library.unr.edu/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3307579.
Full textBinder, Dana M. "The relationship between need for cognition, argument strength, and the persuasiveness of courtroom technology." Laramie, Wyo. : University of Wyoming, 2006. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1225129721&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=18949&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Full textDenver, Megan. "Are capital jurors willing to serve again? investigating race and perceptions of procedural fairness in the deliberation room /." Access to citation, abstract and download form provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company; downloadable PDF file, 55 p, 2009. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1885480891&sid=3&Fmt=2&clientId=8331&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Full textKaufman, Ilana A. "Jury nullification and racism, the effect of nullification instructions and racial prejudice on jurors' verdicts." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ30947.pdf.
Full textWeeks, Stephanie Wright. "Mock Jurors' Ratings of Mitigating Value in Capital Mitigation: Role of Impairment and Defendant Effort." NCSU, 2002. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-20020402-151255.
Full textApplying attribution theory to capital sentencing decisions, it was hypothesized that temporal location of mitigation (suggesting defendant impairment) and level of defendant effort would affect mock jurors' ratings of mitigating value and subsequent life v. death votes. This was tested experimentally in a 2 (type of mitigation: proximal v. remote-chronic) x 2 (defendant effort: high v. low) design with 240 university psychology students. Two sentencing scenarios were nested within each level of type of mitigation. Thus, participants received one of eight sentencing scenarios. Participants rated the evidence on a variety of dimensions, including perceived defendant impairment, effort and responsibility. They also assigned mitigating value to the circumstances presented in the scenarios and indicated a final penalty vote (life in prison or death). Multivariate analysis of variance results indicated that outcomes were affected by whether the mitigation had a recent or distant onset, but they were not affected by the level of defendant effort. The mitigating value rating was a significant predictor of the vote for life, as more mitigating value was associated with an increased likelihood of voting for life. Supplementary analyses indicated that perceived impairment was a significant mediator of the relationship between mitigating value and the vote for life. When controlling for perceptions of impairment, the predictive power of mitigating value was diminished. These results support previous qualitative and exploratory experimental research concerning the efficacy of capital mitigation.
Fletcher, Bevan J. "The effects of defendant physical attractiveness upon the sentencing of mock jurors differing in authoritarianism /." Title page, contents and abstract only, 1998. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09SSPS/09sspsf612.pdf.
Full textEvans, Jacqueline. "Jurors' evaluations of victim and bystander eyewitness identification reliability across different crimes and intoxication levels." FIU Digital Commons, 2007. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3157.
Full textCotrone, Erin Elizabeth. "The Guilty But Mentally Ill Verdict: Assessing the Impact of Informing Jurors of Verdict Consequences." Scholar Commons, 2016. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6486.
Full textHastings, Patricia. "The impact of complainant sexual history evidence on jurors' decision processes in a sexual assault trial." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/nq27296.pdf.
Full textOLIVEIRA, AMANDA ALVES. "INTERFERENCE OF MEDIA ANIMUS JURORS IN DECISIONS BY THE JURY: A CASE STUDY OF ELIZA SAMUDIO." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2013. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=34392@1.
Full textA interferência da mídia no animus dos jurados em decisões proferidas pelo Tribunal do Júri é nítida, principalmente por ter como juízes o próprio povo. Um dos casos mais emblemáticos é o caso Eliza Samúdio, em que uma jovem teria sido assassinada brutalmente a mando do pai do próprio filho, um jogador de futebol famoso. Atuando em tempos e com discursos diferentes, mídia e judiciário seguiram seus caminhos. Caso complexo, repleto de enigmas e o envolvimento de uma pessoa famosa no meio popular apresentou-se perfeito à imprensa por concentrar em si os três assuntos que mais prendem a atenção popular: o crime, esporte e sexo. Além do enigma: onde estariam os restos mortais da jovem? Dia a dia, momento a momento, a imprensa seguia os passos do inquérito policial e do processo penal com o intuito de passar a notícia e com isso perceber os seus lucros, sendo notório que essa cobertura privilegiou a fase de inquérito e do julgamento, sempre enfatizando a personalidade de Bruno Fernandes como fora dos padrões normais. A mídia assim, autoafirmava como autoridade moralizadora, utilizando da narrativa para tanto. Ao fim, viu-se a ratificação de um veredicto já proferido pela mídia muito tempo antes do julgamento, tendo em vista o populismo penal midiático em que Bruno Fernandes fora condenado à reprimenda maior do que no direito se admitiria, principalmente porque o julgamento pelo Tribunal do Júri é feito através do povo, que confirmou o que escutou durante quase três anos.
The interference in the media animus of jurors in decisions made by court s jury is clear, mainly because the judges were their people. One of the most emblematic cases is the Eliza Samúdio, where a young woman had been brutally murdered at the behest of the father of his own son, a famous soccer player. Acting upon different times and speeches, media and judicial branches went their ways. Complex case replete with enigma and the involvement of a famous person in the popular medium presented the perfect press to focus itself on three issues that mostly catches the popular attention, being crime, sport, sex. Besides the enigma: where were the remains of the young woman? Day by day, moment by moment the press followed the steps of the police investigation and criminal procedure in order to pass the news and thus realize their profits, being clear that this coverage favored the stage press inquiries and judgment, always emphasizing the personality of Bruno Fernandes and outside the normal range. The media so, self claimed authority as moralizing, using the narrative to do so. At the end, found itself ratification of a verdict already delivered by the media long before the trial, in view of the penal populism media where Bruno Fernandes was sentenced to reprimand larger than the right would admit, mainly because the trial by jury is made through the people, which confirmed that heard for almost three years.