Academic literature on the topic 'Jurors'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Jurors.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Jurors"
Hubbell, Larry. "Not Quite Civil." Public Voices 6, no. 2-3 (January 11, 2017): 106. http://dx.doi.org/10.22140/pv.268.
Full textHollands, Charlotte. "The virtual jury is out: How do mental health beliefs affect deliberations and verdicts." BPS Branch Awards 1, no. 1 (June 2023): 11–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.53841/bpsba.2023.1.1.11.
Full textFarrell, Amy, Liana Pennington, and Shea Cronin. "Juror Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities and Decision Making in Criminal Cases." Law & Social Inquiry 38, no. 04 (2013): 773–802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01323.x.
Full textLyons, Arthur W., and Joanne Regina. "Mock Jurors' Behavior as a Function of Sex and Exposure to an Educational Videotape about Jury Duty." Psychological Reports 58, no. 2 (April 1986): 599–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1986.58.2.599.
Full textSmirnova, Irina G., Gennady G. Nebratenko, and Marina I. Kazarina. "How to ensure witness immunity for jurors in appellate proceedings?" Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo, no. 47 (2023): 82–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/22253513/47/6.
Full textCornwell, Erin York, and Valerie P. Hans. "Representation through Participation: A Multilevel Analysis of Jury Deliberations." Law & Society Review 45, no. 3 (September 2011): 667–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00447.x.
Full textPozzulo, Joanna D., Julie Dempsey, Evelyn Maeder, and Laura Allen. "The Effects of Victim Gender, Defendant Gender, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making." Criminal Justice and Behavior 37, no. 1 (December 21, 2009): 47–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854809344173.
Full textВладыкина, Татьяна, and Tatyana Vladykina. "Issues of Formation of Jury Panel." Journal of Russian Law 2, no. 5 (April 16, 2014): 84–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/3465.
Full textWarren, Joshua, and Deanna Kuhn. "How do jurors argue with one another?" Judgment and Decision Making 5, no. 1 (February 2010): 64–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500002047.
Full textTaylor, Nick, and Judge Roderick Denyer. "Judicial Management of Juror Impropriety." Journal of Criminal Law 78, no. 1 (February 2014): 43–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/jcla.2014.78.1.891.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Jurors"
Hussey, Heather Joan Catriona. "Potential jurors' perceptions of child witnesses." University of Western Australia. Centre for Forensic Science, 2009. http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2009.0151.
Full textKutys, Jennifer M. "Juror Decision Making: The Impact of Attractiveness and Socioeconomic Status on Criminal Sentencing and an Examination of Motivated Reasoning in Mock Jurors." Wright State University Professional Psychology Program / OhioLINK, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wsupsych1340655235.
Full textDeFranco, Rachel. "Witness Uncertainty and Its Effect on Jurors' Decisions." Kent State University Honors College / OhioLINK, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ksuhonors1355082776.
Full textCamilletti, Catherine Rieman. "Attorneys' and jurors' perceptions of juvenile offenders' culpability." To access this resource online via ProQuest Dissertations and Theses @ UTEP, 2008. http://0-proquest.umi.com.lib.utep.edu/login?COPT=REJTPTU0YmImSU5UPTAmVkVSPTI=&clientId=2515.
Full textHayes-Smith, Rebecca. "The CSI Effect jurors' perceptions and trial decisions /." [Gainesville, Fla.] : University of Florida, 2009. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/UFE0024794.
Full textMcDonald, Emily. "Understanding How Jurors Award Civil Damages: A Test of Affect Control Theory." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2004. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4588/.
Full textTrahan, Adam. "Don't shoot the messenger capital jurors' perceptions of attorneys /." [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University, 2009. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3380134.
Full textTitle from PDF t.p. (viewed on Jul 14, 2010). Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: 4866. Adviser: Marla R. Sandys.
Parisi, Jeanine M. "Quantifying the effects of pretrial publicity on jurors' judgments." Virtual Press, 2000. http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/1178345.
Full textDepartment of Psychological Science
Sicafuse, Lorie L. "Mock Jurors' Attributions and Attributional Processes in a Medical Malpractice Case| Examining the Influence of Plaintiff Weight, Juror Characteristics, and Deliberations." Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, 2015. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3707907.
Full textResearch suggests that most Americans harbor weight-related prejudices, which can translate into discrimination against the obese across a variety of contexts. Yet, little is known about how anti-fat bias may influence juror decisions in cases involving an obese trial participant. This study examined the main and interactive effects of plaintiff weight, deliberations, and individual differences on jurors’ decisions in a medical malpractice case. The Culpable Control Model (CCM) was used to ground the research and to help illuminate the attributional processes underlying mock jurors’ decisions.
College student mock jurors were presented with a photograph of either a normal weight or obese plaintiff and assigned to non-deliberating or deliberating conditions. After reading the case summary, non-deliberating jurors rendered case judgments independently and responded to a series of items designed to measure attributional processes in accordance with the CCM. Deliberating jurors also reviewed the case summary independently but then discussed the case in small groups; each group rendered case judgments as a jury. Following deliberations, jury group members were instructed to provide independent, “individual level” responses to the same series of items completed by the non-deliberating jurors. Several individual differences were assessed in the total sample, including belief in a just world (BJW), belief in the protestant work ethic (BPWE), and anti-fat attitudes (AFAs).
Results revealed no main effects of plaintiff weight on case-related judgments or on any of the measures of attributional processes. However, deliberations and several individual difference variables moderated the effects of plaintiff weight on the dependent variables. Contrary to expectations, deliberations appeared to exacerbate rather than attenuate the effects of anti-fat bias on jurors’ decisions. Compared to non-deliberating jurors, deliberating jurors were more likely to find the obese plaintiff responsible for the negative medical outcome and awarded fewer non-economic damages to the obese plaintiff. Numerous individual differences variables moderated the effects of plaintiff weight on the dependent variables, but BJW was the strongest, most consistent moderator. As expected, those with stronger just world beliefs were less likely to find the defendant liable and were overall more punitive toward the obese plaintiff than those with weaker beliefs. Analyses further indicated that jurors’ attributional processes were consistent with those proposed by the CCM, such that their initial reactions to the case and the plaintiff and defendant influenced their interpretation of attributional information and criteria, which in turn influenced their case decisions. Significant findings not directly tied to formally advanced hypotheses also emerged. Overall, deliberating jurors were more lenient toward the defendant than non-deliberating jurors. In addition, analyses revealed several main effects of individual difference variables on case judgments and attributional processes.
This research is limited in terms of verisimilitude and generalizability; yet, it also yields many significant findings that have thus far been undocumented in published studies. Both the contributions and limitations of this study illuminate exciting directions for future research. In particular, more research is needed to clarify how anti-fat bias may affect jurors’ in particular circumstances, how civil jurors’ decisions may be impacted by deliberations and individual differences more generally, and how the CCM can best be used to help understand decision-making in applied contexts.
Mills, Kelly. "The gay panic defense and moral disengagement in mock jurors." Thesis, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10109746.
Full textThe purpose of this study was to examine moral disengagement strategies, such as dehumanization, responsibility displacement, and victim blame, in mock juror decision making in a case involving the gay panic defense. Mock jurors with high levels of moral disengagement were expected to find the defendant guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter more often than mock jurors with low levels of moral disengagement. Mock jurors read one of two vignettes that outlined a murder case in which the defendant claimed he was provoked either by an unwanted homosexual advanced from the victim, or an attempted robbery and assault by the victim. They were then asked choose between the charges of manslaughter and murder for the defendant. It was hypothesized that the defendant using the gay panic defense would receive more findings of manslaughter than the defendant in the robbery and assault vignette. This hypothesis was not supported, as the defendant in the robbery and assault vignette received more verdicts finding him guilty of manslaughter than the defendant in the gay panic vignette. However, 57% of mock jurors still supported the use of the gay panic defense. Moral disengagement did not have a significant effect on mock juror decision making in either vignette. Mock jurors with high levels of victim blame found the defendant guilty of manslaughter more often than those with low levels of victim blame. Limitations of this study and implications for society and the legal system are discussed, and future directions for research are offered.
Books on the topic "Jurors"
Stanley, Jacqueline D. Jurors' rights. Clearwater, FL: Sphinx Pub., 1996.
Find full textAssembly, Canada Legislature Legislative. Bill: An act respecting jurors and juries. Quebec: Hunter, Rose & Lemieux, 2003.
Find full textInstitute, Pennsylvania Bar, ed. Jurors by the generations. [Mechanicsburg, Pa.]: Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2008.
Find full textWebb, Adrian James. Somerset jurors list 1748. Weston-super-Mare: Harry Galloway Publishing, 1994.
Find full textInstitute, Pennsylvania Bar, ed. What jurors really think. [ Mechanicsburg, Pa.] (5080 Ritter Rd., Mechanicsburg 17055-6903): Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2004.
Find full textInstitute, Pennsylvania Bar, ed. Myths & realities about jurors: An inside look at what jurors think. [Mechanicsburg, Pa.] (5080 Ritter Rd., Mechanicsburg 17055-6903): Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2001.
Find full textUnited States. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. and Judicial Conference of the United States., eds. Handbook for trial jurors serving in the United States District Courts. Washington, D.C: Administration Office of the United States Courts, 2003.
Find full textVirginia. Supreme Court. Office of the Executive Secretary., ed. Handbook for Virginia grand jurors. Richmond, Va. (100 N. 9th St., Richmond 23219): Copies may be obtained from the Office of the Executive Secretary, Supreme Court of Virginia, 1989.
Find full textUnited States. Administrative Office of the United States Courts., ed. Handbook for federal grand jurors. Washington, D.C: Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, 1999.
Find full textUnited States. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. and Judicial Conference of the United States., eds. Handbook for federal grand jurors. Washington, D.C: Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, 2003.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Jurors"
Marder, Nancy S. "Jurors and Juries." In The Handbook of Law and Society, 134–49. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118701430.ch9.
Full textMasschaele, James. "Choosing Jurors and Constituting Juries." In Jury, State, and Society in Medieval England, 89–121. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230616165_4.
Full textSchweitzer, Margaret, and Mary Lou Johnson. "Jurors' Instructions." In On Trial, 41–42. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003423522-24.
Full textTiersma, Peter M. "Instructions to jurors." In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, 267–80. Title: The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics / edited by Malcolm Coulthard, Alison May, Rui Sousa-Silva. Description: Second edition. | London ; New York : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge handbooks in applied linguistics: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429030581-22.
Full textSemmler, Carolyn, Neil Brewer, and Amy Bradfield Douglass. "Jurors believe eyewitnesses." In Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research., 185–209. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13085-009.
Full textBrown, Jennifer, Yvonne Shell, and Terri Cole. "Judge and Jurors." In Revealing Rape’s Many Voices, 163–84. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28616-2_7.
Full textHowe, Mark L., Lauren M. Knott, and Martin A. Conway. "Collaborative Remembering in Eyewitnesses and Jurors." In Memory and Miscarriages of Justice, 149–62. New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Psychology Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315752181-10.
Full textPozzulo, Joanna. "Jurors’ perceptions of the young eyewitness." In The young eyewitness: How well do children and adolescents describe and identify perpetrators?, 139–53. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14956-009.
Full textYelderman, Logan A., Monica K. Miller, and Clayton D. Peoples. "Capital-izing Jurors: How Death Qualification Relates to Jury Composition, Jurors’ Perceptions, and Trial Outcomes." In Advances in Psychology and Law, 27–54. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43083-6_2.
Full textHans, Valerie P., and Neil Vidmar. "Jurors’ Views of Rape: Anger and Ambivalence." In Judging the Jury, 199–217. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6463-2_13.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Jurors"
Lu, Zhipeng, and Zonghan Lyu. "The Global State of Design for Health Education: Reflections on an International Student Competition." In 112th ACSA Annual Meeting. ACSA Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.112.44.
Full textCaragiannis, Ioannis, and Nikolaj Schwartzbach. "Outsourcing Adjudication to Strategic Jurors." In Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-23}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/283.
Full textSarapin, Susan H., and Glenn G. Sparks. "The Effects of Crime-Drama TV Viewing on Mock Jurors in a Murder Trial." In Annual International Conference on Journalism & Mass Communications. Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF), 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2301-3729_jmcomm12.10.
Full textSkorobogatova, O. V., and J. D. Kokambo. "CURRENT PROBLEMS OF THE ORGAINZATION AND FUCTIONING OF THE COURT WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF JURORS." In Правовая система России: история, современность, тенденции развития. Благовещенск: Амурский государственный университет, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22250/9785934934065_125.
Full textKomiljonov, Rafael. "INSTITUTE OF TRIAL BY JURY IN THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE: ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT." In Current problems of jurisprudence. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02032-6/115-124.
Full textKorobova, Ekaterina. "Particularities of defense in judicial rhetoric." In 6th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.06.15173k.
Full textKorobova, Ekaterina. "Particularities of defense in judicial rhetoric." In 6th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.06.15173k.
Full textSilva, Marcos Vinicius M., and Marcos A. Simplicio Jr. "Library Application for a Fair, Traceable, Auditable and Participatory Drawing Tool for Legal Systems." In Anais Estendidos do Simpósio Brasileiro de Segurança da Informação e de Sistemas Computacionais. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação - SBC, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/sbseg_estendido.2020.19278.
Full textIlyukhov, Alexey A. "The need to Increase the Number of Crimes that, by Virtue of the Law, can be Considered by a Court with the Participation of Jurors: Questions and Answers." In АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ РАЗВИТИЯ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОСТИ И ПУБЛИЧНОГО ПРАВА. Санкт-Петербург: Санкт-Петербургский институт (филиал) ВГУЮ (РПА Минюста России), 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.47645/9785604755174_112.
Full textPavlovic, Milorad. "An Analysis of Grading Discrepancy in Architectural Juries: The Case of Summer School Design Courses." In 4th International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism – Full book proceedings of ICCAUA2020, 20-21 May 2021. Alanya Hamdullah Emin Paşa University, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.38027/iccaua2021120n2.
Full textReports on the topic "Jurors"
Blanchard, David. The effects of negligence and causation information on jurors' determination of liability. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.6083.
Full textAnwar, Shamena, Patrick Bayer, and Randi Hjalmarsson. A Jury of Her Peers: The Impact of the First Female Jurors on Criminal Convictions. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, February 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w21960.
Full textHoekstra, Mark, and Brittany Street. The Effect of Own-Gender Juries on Conviction Rates. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w25013.
Full textPaixão, Marcelo. Acesso ao crédito produtivo pelos microempreendedores afrodescendentes: Desafios para a inclusão financeira no Brasil: Sumário executivo. Inter-American Development Bank, May 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0006208.
Full textBergmann, Nadja, Nicolas Pretterhofer, and Helmut Gassler. Gremien, Jurys, Beiräte und Gender - Sammlung von Beispielen für eine (gender-)gerechtere Vergabe. ZSI - Zentrum für Soziale Innovation GmbH, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2018.422.
Full textHolmes, Harriet, and Peter Beazley. Decision-making in juries concerning defendants with mental health problems - a systematic review protocol of experimental studies. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, April 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.4.0038.
Full textHelo, Kermit. Endotracheal Intubation Training Exercise Using a Ferret Model (Mustela putorius Juro). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada529832.
Full textMora, Mat�as S., Enrique P. Lessa, and Ricardo A. Ojeda. Ctenomys juris. En: SAyDS�SAREM (eds.) Categorizaci�n 2019 de los mam�feros de Argentina seg�n su riesgo de extinci�n. Ciudad Aut�noma de Buenos aires: Lista Roja de los mam�feros de Argentina, November 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31687/saremlr.19.373.
Full textLewis, Dustin, ed. Database of States’ Statements (August 2011–October 2016) concerning Use of Force in relation to Syria. Harvard Law School Program on International Law and Armed Conflict, May 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.54813/ekmb4241.
Full textBanco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento relatório anual 2007. Inter-American Development Bank, March 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0005838.
Full text