Academic literature on the topic 'Juiciness'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Juiciness.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Juiciness"
Henderson, H., H. L. Laird, T. Luckemeyer, R. K. Miller, C. R. Kerth, and K. Adhikari. "Predicting Beef Tenderness and Juiciness." Meat and Muscle Biology 1, no. 3 (January 1, 2017): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.22175/rmc2017.021.
Full textWoolley, L. D., T. G. O'Quinn, J. F. Legako, J. C. Brooks, and M. F. Miller. "Evaluation of objective juiciness measurement techniques for prediction of subjective taste panel juiciness ratings." Meat Science 101 (March 2015): 143–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.09.102.
Full textLucherk, L. W., T. G. O'Quinn, J. F. Legako, R. J. Rathmann, J. C. Brooks, and M. F. Miller. "Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings1,2." Journal of Animal Science 95, no. 6 (June 1, 2017): 2421–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.0930.
Full textLucherk, L. W., T. G. O’Quinn, J. F. Legako, R. J. Rathmann, J. C. Brooks, and M. F. Miller. "Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings." Journal of Animal Science 95, no. 6 (2017): 2421. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2016.0930.
Full textThompson, J. M. "The effects of marbling on flavour and juiciness scores of cooked beef, after adjusting to a constant tenderness." Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, no. 7 (2004): 645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ea02171.
Full textWang, Fan, Chunjiang Zhao, and Guijun Yang. "Development of a Non-Destructive Method for Detection of the Juiciness of Pear via VIS/NIR Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometric Methods." Foods 9, no. 12 (November 30, 2020): 1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9121778.
Full textBaltazar, Paola, Eva Cristina Correa, and Belén Diezma. "Instrumental Procedures for the Evaluation of Juiciness in Peach and Nectarine Cultivars for Fresh Consumption." Agronomy 10, no. 2 (January 21, 2020): 152. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020152.
Full textRoger Harker, F., Karen Lau, and F. Anne Gunson. "Juiciness of fresh fruit: a time–intensity study." Postharvest Biology and Technology 29, no. 1 (July 2003): 55–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5214(02)00247-8.
Full textWoolley, L. D., T. G. O'Quinn, J. F. Legako, J. C. Brooks, and M. F. Miller. "Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness." Meat Science 101 (March 2015): 144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.09.103.
Full textKao, Dominic. "The effects of juiciness in an action RPG." Entertainment Computing 34 (May 2020): 100359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100359.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Juiciness"
Buckthal, Eric D. ebucktha. "JUICINESS IN CITIZEN SCIENCE COMPUTER GAMES: ANALYSIS OF A PROTOTYPICAL GAME." DigitalCommons@CalPoly, 2014. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/1278.
Full textFevold, Michaella Ann. "Tenderness and Juiciness of Beef Steaks from Varying Hot Carcass Weights." Thesis, North Dakota State University, 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/31563.
Full textAtanasov, Simeon. "Juiciness: Exploring and designing around experience of feedback in video games." Thesis, Malmö högskola, Fakulteten för kultur och samhälle (KS), 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-22264.
Full textMcKillip, Kassandra. "Determination of the repeatability and accuracy of the Pressed Juice Percentage (PJP) method at sorting beef strip loin steaks into categories of known juiciness." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/32578.
Full textDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry
Travis G. O'Quinn
The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of enhancement on consumer and trained beef palatability scores of three quality grades when cooked to three degrees of doneness (DOD) and to determine the accuracy and repeatability of the Pressed Juice Percentage (PJP). Striploins of USDA Prime, Low Choice, and Low Select quality grades were used in this study. To maximize variation in juiciness, steaks were either enhanced (formulated for 108% pump with a solution of water, salt, and alkaline phosphates) or non-enhanced, and cooked to three degree of doneness (Rare: 60°C, Medium: 71°C, or Very Well-Done: 82°C). All samples were evaluated for Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), Slice Shear Force (SSF), PJP, and palatability traits by consumer and trained panelists. Consumer panelists rated all enhanced treatments similar (P > 0.05) to each other and greater (P < 0.05) for juiciness, tenderness, flavor liking, and overall liking than all non-enhanced treatments. Consumer ratings of juiciness, tenderness, and overall liking scores increased (P < 0.05) as DOD decreased. Consumer panelists rated all enhanced treatments similar (P > 0.05) and greater (P < 0.05) for the percentage of steaks classified as premium quality. For trained panel initial juiciness, all enhanced treatments and non-enhanced Prime samples were similar (P > 0.05) and greater (P < 0.05) than other treatments cooked to Medium and Very Well Done. Results indicated PJP had a relatively high repeatability coefficient (0.70), indicating that only 30% of the variation observed was due to sample measurement differences. The PJP threshold values evaluated accurately segregated steaks by the probability of a sample being rated “juicy” by consumers, with the actual percentage of “juicy” samples determined to be 41.67%, 72.31%, 89.33%, and 98.08% for the <50%, 50 – 75%, 75 – 90%, and >90% categories, respectively. Therefore, enhancement has a substantial, positive effect on beef palatability. Enhancing higher quality beef does not provide an additional palatability benefit; hence the greatest economic advantage is in enhancing lower quality beef products. Results of this study indicate the PJP juiciness method is both repeatable and accurate at sorting steaks based on the likelihood of a steak being “juicy”.
Han, Jin. "The effect of pre-rigor infusion of lamb with kiwifruit juice on meat quality." Diss., Lincoln University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10182/334.
Full textDrey, Lindsey. "Evaluation of the beef marbling insurance theory." Thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/39120.
Full textDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry
Travis G. O'Quinn
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the extent marbling compensates for reduced beef palatability at elevated degrees of doneness and to determine the relationship of residual moisture and fat in cooked steaks to beef palatability, specifically beef juiciness. Paired strip loins (IMPS # 180) were collected to equally represent five quality treatments [Prime, Top Choice (modest and moderate marbling), Low Choice, Select, and Select Enhanced (110% of raw weight)]. Steaks were grouped into sets of three consecutively cut steaks and randomly assigned a degree of doneness (DOD): very-rare (VR; 55°C), rare (R; 60°C), medium-rare (MR; 63°C), medium (M; 71°C), well-done (WD; 77°C), or very well-done (VWD; 82°C). Samples were subjected to consumer and trained sensory evaluation, Warner-Braztler shear force (WBSF), slice shear force (SSF), pressed juice percentage (PJP) evaluation, and raw and cooked proximate analysis. There were no (P > 0.05) interactions for consumer sensory ratings, indicating increased DOD had the same negative impact regardless of marbling level. There was a quality treatment × DOD interaction (P < 0.05) for percentage of steaks rated acceptable by consumers for juiciness. Increased marbling extended the point in which steaks became unacceptable for juiciness. Similarly, there was a quality treatment × DOD interaction (P < 0.05) for trained juiciness ratings. When cooked to MR and lower, Prime was only rated 8 to 18% higher (P < 0.05) than Select for trained juiciness ratings but was rated 38 to 123% higher (P < 0.05) than Select when cooked to M and higher. Besides cook loss, combined cooked moisture and fat percentage was more highly associated (P < 0.01) to consumer juiciness (r = 0.69) and trained initial (r = 0.84) and sustained (r = 0.85) juiciness ratings than all other objective evaluations. For regression analysis, cooked moisture and fat percentages, alone, were poor indicators of consumer and trained juiciness ratings. However, when combined, the regression equations explained 45, 74, and 69% of the variation in consumer, trained initial, and trained sustained juiciness ratings, respectively. These results indicate that increased marbling levels only offer “insurance” for juiciness of steaks that are cooked at high degrees of doneness, but not for other palatability traits. Additionally, cooked residual moisture and fat percentages when combined are a good indicator of sensory juiciness ratings.
Yang, Hsiao-Yuan, and 楊曉媛. "Differential protein expression in the pectoralis major muscle of Taiwan country chickens with different tenderness and juiciness." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/76014663302699934450.
Full text國立中興大學
動物科學系所
104
Meat quality is the most important economic trait of Taiwan country chickens. Tenderness, flavor and juiciness are the major meat quality traits of chicken. This study was conducted to explore the differential protein expression in the pectoralis major muscle of Taiwan country chickens with different tenderness and juiciness. The differences in muscle proteins with different meat quality traits could be used as candidate biomarkers for improving meat quality characteristics in chickens. The pectoralis major muscles from 16- and 18-week-old Taiwan country chickens (n=16) of Livestock Research Institute inbreeding line L11 were used. The samples were ranked for tenderness (n=10) according to the shear force, collagen content, and percentage of soluble collagen of samples and ranked for juiciness (n=6) according to the water holding capacity, moisture and drip loss of samples. The top and bottom 3 pectoralis major muscle samples were subjected to proteomic analysis. Results show that there were 22 and 32 out of 378 quantified protein spots differed significantly between the pectoralis major muscles with different tenderness and juiciness (P < 0.05) from 16- and 18-wk-old chickens, respectively. The differentially expressed protein spots were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting and annotated by gene ontology. The differentially expressed triose-phosphate isomerase, phosphoglycerate mutase 1, and pyruvate kinase PKA between pectoralis major muscles with different tenderness involve in glycolysis. The differentially expressed L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain and myofibrillar proteins between pectoralis major muscles with different juiciness associate with lactate dehydrogenase and post-mortem protein denaturation. The results of this study suggest that tenderness of the pectoralis major muscle of Taiwan country chickens may be associated with proteins related to glycolysis and juiciness of the pectoralis major muscle may be associated with proteins related to lactate dehydrogenase and post-mortem protein denaturation.
Book chapters on the topic "Juiciness"
Holloway, Joseph William, and Jianping Wu. "Juiciness Intrinsic Character." In Red Meat Science and Production, 143–49. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7860-7_6.
Full textWinger, R. J., and C. J. Hagyard. "Juiciness — its importance and some contributing factors." In Quality Attributes and their Measurement in Meat, Poultry and Fish Products, 94–124. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2167-9_4.
Full textHonikel, K. O., and R. Hamm. "Measurement of water-holding capacity and juiciness." In Quality Attributes and their Measurement in Meat, Poultry and Fish Products, 125–61. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2167-9_5.
Full text"Beef Texture and Juiciness." In Handbook of Meat and Meat Processing, 196–225. CRC Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b11479-13.
Full textZerbini, P. Eccher, M. Grassi, and S. Grazianetti. "OPERATING PARAMETERS FOR INSTRUMENTAL MEASUREMENT OF JUICINESS IN FRUITS." In Agri-Food Quality II, 290–93. Elsevier, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9781845698140.6.290.
Full textWarner, Robyn D. "The Eating Quality of Meat—IV Water-Holding Capacity and Juiciness." In Lawrie´s Meat Science, 419–59. Elsevier, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100694-8.00014-5.
Full text"Burbot: Ecology, Management, and Culture." In Burbot: Ecology, Management, and Culture, edited by Martin A. Stapanian and Yukio Kakuda. American Fisheries Society, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.47886/9781888569988.ch18.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Juiciness"
Hicks, Kieran, Kathrin Gerling, Graham Richardson, Tom Pike, Oliver Burman, and Patrick Dickinson. "Understanding the Effects of Gamification and Juiciness on Players." In 2019 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cig.2019.8848105.
Full textReports on the topic "Juiciness"
Ibarburu, Maro, James B. Kliebenstein, and Brent M. Hueth. pH as a Predictor of Flavor, Juiciness, Tenderness and Texture in Pork from Pigs in a Niche Market System. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State University, January 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/ans_air-180814-666.
Full text