Relevant bibliographies by topics / Judicial review – Italy

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Judicial review – Italy'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Judicial review – Italy.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Judicial review – Italy"

1

VOLCANSEK, MARY L. "Political Power and Judicial Review in Italy." Comparative Political Studies 26, no. 4 (January 1994): 492–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414094026004005.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay traces the development of the power of the Italian Constitutional Court, the political impact of its policies, and its reception by the public and the other institutions of government. The relationship between the Court and Parliament is presented as one characterized by a synchronization of powers, and the Court has demonstrated reluctance to interfere in conflicts among the various branches of the national government. That timidity has not, however, carried over into its treatment of referenda or of national versus regional prerogatives. The Constitutional Court is, according to this analysis, a part of the national governing elite, and its most controversial decisions have been ones safeguarding the interests of that elite. By carefully acting as “quasi-guardians,” the Constitutional Court judges have cemented a solidly positive reputation and nurtured an aura of legitimacy that is rare among Italian political actors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Volcansek, Mary L. "Judicial Review in Italy: A Reflection of the United States?" Policy Studies Journal 19, no. 1 (September 1990): 127–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1990.tb00882.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Volcansek, Mary L. "Bargaining Constitutional Design in Italy: Judicial Review as Political Insurance." West European Politics 33, no. 2 (February 18, 2010): 280–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380903538906.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Caroccia, Raffaele. "Maritime Concessions in Italy." Slovak Yearbook of European Union Law 1 (December 31, 2021): 59–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.54869/syeul.2021.1.247.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper deals with the treatment – both legislative and judicial – of maritime concessions in Italy. It first analyses legal provisions regarding the term of duration of such concessions and then focuses on some recent sentences. The first of them could have made stronger the conflict between the Italian legal environment and EU one, as the legislative automatic prorogation of concessions was deemed to be legitimate. Luckily, further rulings stated that this legislative statute is not in line with EU law and so has to be non applied. The Council of State solved the question very recently: not only Italian legal discipline was sentenced not to be in line with the EU law, but also some guidelines were given to step out the impasse. Judicial review so proved out to be once again the key element to grant rule of law, even when relationships between different legal environments are concerned.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Shumylo, Mykhailo. "Judicial assistant: current state of legal regulation and review of court practice." Yearly journal of scientific articles “Pravova derzhava”, no. 32 (2021): 323–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.33663/0869-2491-2021-32-323-330.

Full text
Abstract:
Patronage service(executive support service)is a type of service and employment relations that arise, change and terminate to ensure effective, proper and quality performance of their duties by officials who are legally entitled to have a patronage servant. The term “patronage” comes from “patronatus” in Latin- the state or rights of the patron. In the national legislation, the patronage service is a quite new category and was first introduced in 1993 with the adoption of the Law on Civil Service, and therefore has no old traditions. The change in the status of the patronage service in Ukraine indirectly indicates its formation. There is no single approach to the principles of patronage service in foreign countries, for example, in Italy and Germany patronage service does not stand out as a separate concept, but such kind relationships are included in the public service, while in Australia, Britain, Georgia, Canada, Lithuania and Poland patronage service conceptually stands out as a category of public service with a number of special rules. The establishment of a patronage service in Ukraine was an objective necessity and today it operates in the system of legislative, executive and judicial branches. The labor functions of patronage service employees are directly correlated with the labor functions of public law official to whom they are assigned (subordinated). The patronage service includes advisers, assistants, commissioners, press-secretaries of the President of Ukraine, employees of the secretariats of the Chairman, First Deputy Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, employees of patronage services of the Prime Minister of Ukraine and other members of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, advising assistants of People's Deputies of Ukraine, judicial assistants and scientific advisers to judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, judicial assistants, advisers to the Chairman of the Supreme Court and chairmen of cassation courts, as well as positions of patronage servants in other state bodies. At the same time as for judiciary, part 4 of Article 92 of the Civil Service Law (2015) states that the specifics of patronage service in courts, bodies and institutions of the judicial system are determined by the legislation on the judiciary and the status of judges. Judicial assistants are an integral part of the judiciary. Despite their legal status, whether civil or patronage servants, the lion's share of work is performed by judicial assistants. It can be concluded, directly or indirectly, that effective work of a court or a judge is not possible without the effective work of judicial assistants (judges' offices) and this interdependency is obvious. It should also be noted that a significant number of assistants later become judges, or if we take a look at the biographies of judges of all levels we can find out that many of them took their first steps in the legal profession as judicial assistants. This might lead to the conclusion that “judicial assistants environment” is a kind of a personnel reserve of the judiciary.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Vese, Donato. "Judicial Review of the NCA’s Decisions: Some Problematic Aspects of the EU Damages Directive in the Context of Italian Law." European Public Law 26, Issue 4 (December 1, 2020): 961–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/euro2020073.

Full text
Abstract:
In the Italian legal system, the transposition of Directive 2014/104/EU into Legislative Decree No. 3 of 2017, with a view to improving the efficacy of both ‘follow-on’ and ‘stand-alone’ legal actions in private and public antitrust enforcement, has highlighted the problem of the judicial review of National Competition Authority (NCA) decisions. The Directive established its own ‘binding effect’ designed by the European Union order to increase the effectiveness and procedural efficiency of actions for damages in the Member States. According to the logic of the European Union, the binding effect seeks to ensure that an infringement of competition law, established by a final decision of the NCA or a court of judicial review, is deemed to be irrefutably acknowledged for the purpose of bringing an action for damages before the national courts under Article 101 or 102 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) or under national competition law. However, in terms of accomplishing this objective, the prevision introduced into Italian law by Article 9(1) of the Directive becomes problematic when set against the current system of judicial review of NCA decisions in Italy, potentially undermining the effectiveness of the legal protection of the individual. The focus of the article is that the Italian system does not – in its current form – allow adequate judicial review of NCA decisions. Taking the interpretation of Articles 6(1) European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and 24 of the Italian Constitution as fundamental norms establishing the ‘right to a fair trial’ and the ‘right to a defence’ as its starting point, the article seeks to offer a solution to the problem arising in relation to full judicial review of NCA decisions within the Italian legal context based on the thesis that if there is no full revision of the facts and no full revision of the discretionary powers there can be no full judicial review. EU Damages Directive, Private and public antitrust enforcement systems, The binding effect of the NCA’s decisions, Administrative and technical discretion, Judicial review of the NCA’s fact findings and technical assessments; European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law, Articles 6(1) ECHR and 24 of the Italian Constitution, Intensity of review in Italy, Full jurisdiction of the Italian administrative courts
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Caranta, Roberto. "Still Searching for a Reliable Script: Access to Scientific Knowledge in Environmental Litigation in Italy." European Energy and Environmental Law Review 27, Issue 4 (August 1, 2018): 158–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eelr2018019.

Full text
Abstract:
During the past 20 years, the rules on evidence and the approach to access to scientific knowledge by administrative courts have evolved towards a some- what closer look to the factual findings upon which administrative decisions are based. The practice of judicial review, including in environmental matters, however, is often rather deferent to the findings of the public decision makers. In practice, judicial review in environmental cases is therefore still very much focused on the reasons given, looking at their logical consistency more than at their soundness, and even less so at the soundness of the decision taken (unless of course the decision plainly conforms to or instead flies in the face of common sense). It is submitted that the more hands-off judgments are hard to reconcile with the requirement of "substantive legality" review predicated in Article 9 of the Aarhus Convention.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Panara, Carlo. "The Enforceability of Subsidiarity in the EU and the Ethos of Cooperative Federalism: A Comparative Law Perspective." European Public Law 22, Issue 2 (April 1, 2016): 305–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/euro2016020.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article, I will tackle the issue of the enforceability of subsidiarity in the EU and, more specifically, I will deal with the following questions: if and to what extent subsidiarity is justiciable; if the full justiciability of subsidiarity would be politically sustainable; and if there are any alternatives to the judicial enforcement of subsidiarity. I will argue that subsidiarity is justiciable, even though its judicial enforcement should be limited to particular situations. I will also argue that full justiciability of subsidiarity would be politically unsustainable in the long run and that a balanced combination of judicial review, procedural arrangements and political cooperation is the only alternative to an all-encompassing judicial enforcement of subsidiarity. In tackling this issue, I will use a comparative law approach in that I will make extensive reference to the legal systems of Germany and Italy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Shcherbyna, V. A. "Reasonable terms of judicial review as an element of protection of the right to a fair trial in the context of the ECHR practice: the experience of Italy." Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no. 2 (July 24, 2022): 116–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.02.21.

Full text
Abstract:
The article analyzes the experience of Italy related to the obligation of the state to implement at the national level an effective mechanism for protecting the right to trial within a reasonable time, taking into account the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. It was also pointed out that the issue of implementation of the principle of fair trial is rather complicated. The author stated that the right to a fair trial, enshrined in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and fundamental freedoms, includes several components that expand and detail its contents. The article stated that the reasonable term of the trial is a separate element of accessibility of justice. The author determined that the term of judicial review begins to count from the moment of the submission of the claim to the court and it is finished by the execution of the court decision. At the same time, it can be considered reasonable, taking into account the complexity of a particular civil case, behavior of the applicant and government bodies, the importance of the question for the applicant or the special situation of the person who is applying to court for the protection of his violated, unrecognized or disputed right, freedom or interest. The author also drew attention to the fact that the overload of the judicial system can be caused by certain emergency situations, for example, economic recession, when the state cannot predict an increase in the number of disputes in advance. The article stated that Italy is the first state to introduce legal measures of protection of the right to fair trial within reasonable time at the level of national legislation. The author noted that the understanding of the terms of the consideration of each civil case is guaranteed by fairness in the judicial process and it is a separate element of the accessibility of justice. The article determined that the ECHR does not recognize specific terms that could be considered reasonable or unwise, but the Court has developed certain criteria for assessing the understanding of such terms of judicial review, which will lead to greater effectiveness of judicial protection. On the example of experience of Italy, the author stated that the introduction of new legal mechanisms in the legal models of states cannot always solve the problem and such an approach requires more detailed research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Shcherbyna, V. "Reasonable terms of judicial review as an element of protection of the right to a fair trial in the context of the ECHR practice: the experience of Italy." Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, no. 71 (August 25, 2022): 158–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.71.26.

Full text
Abstract:
The article analyzes the experience of Italy related to the obligation of the state to implement at the national level an effective mechanism for protecting the right to trial within a reasonable time, taking into account the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. It was also pointed out that the issue of implementation of the principle of fair trial is rather complicated. The author stated that the right to a fair trial, enshrined in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and fundamental freedoms, includes several components that expand and detail its contents. The article stated that the reasonable term of the trial is a separate element of accessibility of justice. The author determined that the term of judicial review begins to count from the moment of the submission of the claim to the court and it is finished by the execution of the court decision. At the same time, it can be considered reasonable, taking into account the complexity of a particular civil case, behavior of the applicant and government bodies, the importance of the question for the applicant or the special situation of the person who is applying to court for the protection of his violated, unrecognized or disputed right, freedom or interest. The author also drew attention to the fact that the overload of the judicial system can be caused by certain emergency situations, for example, economic recession, when the state cannot predict an increase in the number of disputes in advance. The article stated that Italy is the first state to introduce legal measures of protection of the right to fair trial within reasonable time at the level of national legislation. The author noted that the understanding of the terms of the consideration of each civil case is guaranteed by fairness in the judicial process and it is a separate element of the accessibility of justice. The article determined that the ECHR does not recognize specific terms that could be considered reasonable or unwise, but the Court has developed certain criteria for assessing the understanding of such terms of judicial review, which will lead to greater effectiveness of judicial protection. On the example of experience of Italy, the author stated that the introduction of new legal mechanisms in the legal models of states cannot always solve the problem and such an approach requires more detailed research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Judicial review – Italy"

1

Corkin, Nicola Christine. "Developments in abstract judicial review in Germany, Austria and Italy." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2011. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/2835/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis investigates the reasons for the change in decision-making patterns in abstract judicial review in Germany, Italy and Austria in the last three decades. The literature on constitutional courts suggests that there are six factors influencing the decision-making of a constitutional court judge: personal political attitudes of the judges, direct influence by political institutions, Black Letter of the Law, Precedent, changes in public opinion and the harmonisation of national law with European law. The empirical data shows that throughout the last three decades the conditions in which legislation is formulated has become more complex through the harmonisation of national law with European Law. This causes the courts to react in three distinct ways: 1. The style of decisions is more interpretative 2. More laws are, at least in part, found unconstitutional 3. The pattern of decisions is leaning towards more unconstitutionality rulings so as to clarify the political framework for future legislation. Worry is expressed by the courts that not all the cases reaching them are referred to them in good intention. Politicians are increasingly using the complexity of the political system to refer cases to the courts on which they would prefer not to take a decision.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Condorelli, Martina. "I principi di certezza del diritto e di sécurité juridique e le garanzie offerte al cittadino in Italia e in Francia." Thesis, Paris 2, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PA020081.

Full text
Abstract:
Depuis quelques années, les juges administratifs italien et français montrent un souci de plus en plus explicite de protection de la sécurité juridique, qui les a portés à s’arroger le pouvoir de moduler les effets des annulations, sur le modèle de la Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne. Ce souci n’est pourtant pas nouveau : en France comme en Italie, de nombreuses théories jurisprudentielles, anciennes et nouvelles, visant à préserver les actes illégaux des effets de l’annulation contentieuse témoignaient déjà de son existence. Les nouvelles techniques de protection de la sécurité juridique, et notamment la modulation, ont reçu un accueil doctrinal très différent dans les deux pays: si en France elles ont - du moins initialement - trouvé un terrain favorable, en Italie, le recul de la légalité au profit de la sécurité juridique a été fortement critiqué comme allant à l’encontre des garanties offertes aux administrés par l’art. 113 de la Constitution italienne. D’une part, la thèse décrit et analyse les techniques de protection de la stabilité de l’acte illégal - ou de ses effets - utilisées par les juges administratifs italien et français, dans le but de cerner ce que, concrètement, les juges entendent protéger lorsqu’ils écartent le principe de légalité au profit de la sécurité juridique afin de parvenir à une définition plus précise de ce que représente ce principe dans ce contexte. D’autre part, la recherche analyse l’impact des tendances jurisprudentielles décrites sur les garanties offertes aux administrés, afin de parvenir à une explication du différent accueil reçu par les techniques de protection de la sécurité juridique dans les deux pays
Since the beginning of the XXI century, Italian and French administrative courts have shown an increasing interest in the protection of legal certainty, which eventually culminated in the adoption of the power to modulate the temporal effects of judicial annulments, along the lines of the powers granted to the European Court of Justice by art. 264, sect. 2 T.F.E.U. An in-depth analysis of Italian and French case law revealed that several legal doctrines aimed at the preservation of unlawful administrative acts from the effects of an annulment had already been developed by domestic Courts prior to the introduction of the power to modulate their decisions, thus demonstrating a long-lasting commitment to legal certainty by the Courts.The new techniques generated different responses in the two sides of the Alps. While in France, they received general approval by legal scholars – at least initially – and their use is now widespread, in Italy they have been almost unanimously deemed in contravention of the guarantees enshrined in article 113 of the Italian Constitution. The dissertation describes and analyses the old and new techniques by which the stability of an unlawful act or of its effects are protected by Italian and French Courts, with the aim of further defining the concept of legal certainty by illustrating what is actually protected by the Court when the principle of legal certainty is acknowledged to prevail on the principle of legality. Furthermore, the dissertation focuses on the impact of these techniques on the justiciability of citizens’ rights, in France and in Italy, as a means to explain the different reception the power of modulation has had in the two Countries
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

PEREYRA, Fabian Hector. "Efectos temporales de las sentencias declarativas de inconstitucionalidad de las leyes : Estudio de derecho comparado: Estados Unidos de Norteamerica e Italia." Doctoral thesis, 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4748.

Full text
Abstract:
Defence date: 11 December 1992
Examining board: Augusto Mario Morello ; Mauro Cappelletti (co-supervisor) ; Alessandro Pizzorusso ; Vincenzo Vigoriti ; Luis María Diez-Picazo (supervisor)
First made available online on 4 November 2015.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Judicial review – Italy"

1

Antonio, Ruggeri, and Silvestri Gaetano, eds. Corte costituzionale e parlamento: Profili problematici e ricostruttivi. Milano: Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Baldassarre, Anna Maria De Cesaris. Decreto legge e Corte costituzionale. Camerino: Università degli studi di Camerino, Istituto di diritto pubblico, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Maurizio, Pedrazza Gorlero, ed. Il precedente nella giurisprudenza della Corte costituzionale. Padova: CEDAM, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

I giudizi della Corte costituzionale. Bari: Cacucci, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Cerri, Augusto. Corso di giustizia costituzionale. 4th ed. Milano: Giuffrè, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Italy. Codice della giustizia costituzionale. Milano: A. Giuffrè, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Maurizio, Pedrazza Gorlero, ed. Il precedente nella giurisprudenza della Corte costituzionale. Padova: CEDAM, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Giangaspero, Paolo. Il principio di legalità e il seguito amministrativo delle sentenze di accoglimento della corte costituzionale. Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Roger, Campione, and Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, eds. Las sentencias básicas del tribunal constitucional italiano: Estudio de una jurisdicción de la libertad. Madrid: Boletín Oficial del Estado, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Zagrebelsky, Gustavo. La giustizia costituzionale. [Bologna]: Il Mulino, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Judicial review – Italy"

1

della Cananea, Giacinto. "Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Italy: Beyond Deference?" In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 271–93. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Italy." In Judicial Review of Commercial Contracts. Beck/Nomos/Hart, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509931774.ch-007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"G. Italy." In Judicial Review of Commercial Contracts, edited by Hannes Wais and Thomas Pfeiffer, 152–73. Verlag C.H.BECK oHG, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/9783406779381-152.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Galetta, Diana-Urania, and Paolo Provenzano. "Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Italy." In Judicial Review of Administration in Europe, 62–64. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0010.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter illustrates administrative procedure and judicial review in Italy. According to article 113 of the Italian Constitution, 'the judicial safeguarding of rights and legitimate interests before the organs of ordinary or administrative justice is always permitted towards acts of the public administration'. In Italy, judicial review of administrative action is performed by specific courts: a court of first instance, called Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale (TAR), which is established in every Region, and the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State), which acts as an appeal court. The judicial process before these courts is now regulated by the Code of Administrative Process (CAP). Article 7 CAP provides that the administrative courts have jurisdiction over all acts that the public administrations and legal entities equivalent to them adopt in the exercise of their administrative authority. Since 1889, the Italian system of administrative justice has centred on the provision that administrative acts can be annulled by the administrative courts only in cases of 'breach of law', 'misuse or abuses of power', and/or 'lack of competence'.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Calabresi, Steven Gow. "The Republic of Italy." In The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2, 133–56. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075736.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter looks at Italian judicial review and the Italian Constitution’s Bill of Rights. The Italian Bill of Rights and Italian judicial review emerged primarily as the result of a rights from wrongs process. This is shown by the Italian Constitutional Court’s first case in which it overturned an Italian Fascist-era law forbidding the distribution of political pamphlets. Moreover, judicial review has thrived in Italy because, unlike Japan, the Italian Constitution sets up a variety of different competing power centers among which the Constitutional Court can navigate to get its way. Meanwhile, the complex Italian political party systems in the last sixty years may have allowed the Italian Constitutional Court more freedom to navigate the Italian political process for the same reason that radical proportional representation in Israel helped Aharon Barak in cementing in place Israeli constitutionalism. Finally, Italy’s multiparty system may have caused alliances on the left and on the right to constitutionalize rights for “insurance and commitment” reasons.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"Methods and Criteria of Judgment on the Question of Rights to Freedom in Italy." In Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective, 227–65. Brill | Nijhoff, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004479401_008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Auby, Jean-Bernard. "France, Italy, and Spain." In Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws, 299–301. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867555.003.0015.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter compares the respective answers that are provided by the French, Italian, and Spanish systems of administrative liability at two levels. The first one concerns the foundations of present public liability law in the three countries. It considers both constitutional and legislative provisions concerning substance and the rules governing process; that is, administrative appeals and judicial review. The second level is that of the answers given to a range of basic options, including whether liability is imposed on the basis of illegality, with or without wrongdoing, and which type of compensation can be obtained by claimants.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bassani, Alessandra. "Initial Investigation on Excess of Power: Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Italy (1890–1910)." In Administrative Justice Fin de siècle, 162–92. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867562.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
This study has been carried out in accordance with a precise methodology: it examines the decisions handed down by the Fourth Chamber of the Council of State in its first twenty years of operation on the issue of excess of power. An interpretation of excess of power could be proposed whereby its substance is not to be found in the concept itself, but rather in the explanations provided by the organ that created it as it examines each individual case. Thus, excess of power cannot be pinned down to one single concept, nor should the continuity among its various manifestations be understood conceptually; rather it must be examined from a historical perspective on a case-by-case basis. It is there that it can be seen how excess of power has characterized the work of the Council of State more than any other issue over the course of its existence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Susanna, Lopopolo. "Part II The Member State Reports on Transposition of the Directive, 10 Italy." In The EU Antitrust Damages Directive. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law-ocl/9780198812760.003.0010.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter focuses on the transposition of the Antitrust Damages Directive in Italy. It first considers the transposition procedure, with emphasis on the Italian competition law system and more specifically public enforcement of antitrust law under the Autorità Garante per la concorrenza ed il mercato (AGCM), before discussing the issue of the ‘topographic’ location of the implementing regulation within the current legal system. It then examines the substantive and temporal scope of Italy’s transposition measure, known as Legge Delega, as well as specific issues that arose during the transposition, including those relating to disclosure of evidence, penalties, the binding force of National Competition Authority (NCA) decisions and judicial review, time limitation rules, joint and several liability, parent company liability, the passing-on of overcharges, the use of AGCM expertise in quantifying damages, consensual resolution of disputes, collective redress, and the concentration of jurisdiction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Judicial review – Italy' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography