Academic literature on the topic 'Israeli Public opinion'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Israeli Public opinion.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Israeli Public opinion"
Peretz, Don. "Israeli Public Opinion." Journal of Palestine Studies 26, no. 3 (1997): 98–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2538164.
Full textMusleh, Rami Saleh Abdelrazeq, Mahmoud Ismail, and Dala Mahmoud. "Palestinian State through the Official and Unofficial Israeli Perspective." Asian Social Science 14, no. 3 (February 26, 2018): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n3p55.
Full textArian, Asher, Eytan Gilboa, Elia Zureik, and Fouad Moughrabi. "American Public Opinion toward Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict." Political Psychology 9, no. 4 (December 1988): 701. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791536.
Full textDoob, Leonard W., and Eytan Gilboa. "American Public Opinion toward Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict." Political Science Quarterly 102, no. 3 (1987): 526. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2151423.
Full textRidge, Hannah M. "Jewish Nationalism in Israel: A Measurement." Religions 15, no. 7 (July 17, 2024): 864. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel15070864.
Full textLeep, Matthew, and Jeremy Pressman. "Foreign cues and public views on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict." British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21, no. 1 (November 21, 2018): 169–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1369148118809807.
Full textPeretz, Don. "Israeli Public Opinion: Security Threatened: Surveying Israel Opinion on Peace and War. . Asher Arian." Journal of Palestine Studies 26, no. 3 (April 1997): 98–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jps.1997.26.3.00p0142d.
Full textShany, Yuval. "Capacities and Inadequacies: A Look at the Two Separation Barrier Cases." Israel Law Review 38, no. 1-2 (2005): 230–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021223700012681.
Full textLustick, Ian S. "Making Sense of the Nakba." Journal of Palestine Studies 44, no. 2 (2015): 7–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jps.2015.44.2.7.
Full textGinat, Rami, and Marwan Abu-Ghazaleh Mahajneh. "Rethinking the Egyptian–Israeli Peace Treaty: Perceptions and Receptions Within Egyptian Society (1977–1982)." Contemporary Review of the Middle East 9, no. 1 (November 10, 2021): 9–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23477989211053524.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Israeli Public opinion"
Zeumer, Mathias. "Israeli Rejection of the Arab Peace Initiative: Political Climate and Public Perceptions." Thesis, University of Oregon, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18737.
Full textOdeh, Rana Kamal. "The Impact of Changing Narratives on American Public Opinion Toward the U.S.-Israel Relationship." Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2014. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1401818860.
Full textSpäti, Christina. "Die schweizerische Linke und Israel : Israelbegeisterung, Antizionismus und Antisemitismus zwischen 1967 und 1991 /." Essen : Klartext, 2006. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/68628499.html.
Full textShchomak, Omelyan. "Jerusalém e jogos de dois níveis:posições de Israel e Palestina no período 2005-2019 e influência das pressões internas e externas sobre os decisores." Master's thesis, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/19162.
Full textO Estatuto de Jerusalém é um dos principais problemas que não foi resolvido ao longo da história do conflito entre Israel e a Palestina. O objetivo desta tese é analisar as mudanças nas posições dos negociadores israelitas e palestinianos e dos constituintes domésticos de ambas as partes em relação ao estatuto de Jerusalém. Foi usada a abordagem teórica de jogos de dois níveis, cujo argumento basilar é de que o negociador procura obter um acordo que seja atrativo para os seus constituintes domésticos. No caso de Israel foi escolhida a opinião pública e o Knesset e no caso da Palestina a opinião pública e o partido Fatah como constituintes internos. Foram analisados os win-sets de cada lado e a forma como estes moldaram as negociações. Foram consideradas as pressões externas dos EUA e da Liga Árabe nos negociadores e seus constituintes. Foi feita a pesquisa documental extensiva da literatura, artigos de jornais de notícias, discursos políticos, relatórios das negociações e estudos da opinião pública. Foi encontrado que durante o processo de paz de Annapolis ambas as partes tiveram maiores hipóteses de se comprometerem em relação a Jerusalém Oriental. A coligação governamental israelita apontava mais para o centro do espectro político, e o público de ambos os lados estava mais disposto a assumir compromissos sobre Jerusalém Oriental. Com a subida de Netanyahu ao poder e a formação das sucessivas coligações governamentais da direita, para Israel não seria possível aceitar compromissos em relação à cidade. O apoio público aos compromissos sobre Jerusalém dos dois lados decresceu ao longo dos anos. O lado palestiniano, apesar de manter a posição constante – estabelecimento da soberania palestiniana sobre os territórios ocupados por Israel desde 1967, acabaria por estar mais disposto a assumir compromissos sobre Jerusalém Oriental.
The status of Jerusalem has been one of the main unresolved issues throughout all the history of Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the shifts of the Israeli and Palestinian negotiators positions and of its domestic constituents on the Jerusalem status. Two-Level Games approach was used to analyze this issue. In this approach negotiator seeks to achieve an agreement that will be attractive to his domestic constituents. Public opinion and Knesset in the case of Israel and public opinion and Fatah party in the case of Palestine were considered as domestic constituents in this thesis. The win-sets of each side and the way they shaped the negotiations were analyzed. External influences, such as international pressures of US and Arab League and their reverberations were also considered. An extensive research of the literature, newspaper articles, public discourses, negotiations reports, official documents, and public opinion polls, was performed. It was found that both parties had the greatest opportunity to compromise over East Jerusalem during Annapolis peace process: the Governmental coalition of Israel was shifted to the centre of the political spectrum and public support of both sides was the highest during this period. With Netanyahu’s rise to the power, successive governmental coalitions shifted more to the right and would not accept any compromise over Jerusalem. Public support for negotiations and compromises over Jerusalem has also dropped on both sides. In case of Palestine, despite maintaining a constant position – establishing Palestinian sovereignty over territories which Israel occupied in 1967, Abbas and Fatah were willing to accept compromises over East Jerusalem.
N/A
Cummins, Joshua I. "Hearts and Minds: US Foreign Policy and Anti-Americanism in the Middle EastAn Analysis of Public Perceptions from 2002-2011." Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1366212110.
Full textMnyaka, Mluleki Michael Ntutuzelo. "Xenophobia as a response to foreigners in post-apartheid South Africa and post-exilic Israel: a comparative critique in the light of the gospel and Ubuntu ethical principles." Thesis, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1176.
Full textReligious Studies and Arabic
D.Th.(Theological Ethics)
Books on the topic "Israeli Public opinion"
Ben-Meir, Yehuda. Israeli public opinion. [Tel Aviv]: Tel Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 1995.
Find full textAʼsi, Murad. Israeli and Palestinian public opinion. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Near East Cultural and Educational Foundation of Canada, 1986.
Find full textArian, Alan. Israeli security opinion, February 1996. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 1996.
Find full textMerkaz le-meḥḳarim asṭraṭegiyim ʻal shem Yafeh, ed. Israeli public opinion on national security, 2000. Tel Aviv: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 2000.
Find full textArian, Alan. Israeli public opinion and the war in Lebanon. [Tel Aviv, Israel]: Tel Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 1985.
Find full textBoer, Connie de. West European public opinion and the Palestine question. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Near East Cultural and Educational Foundation of Canada, 1986.
Find full textRejwan, Nissim. Arab aims and Israeli attitudes: A critique of Yehoshafat Harkabi's prognosis of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Jerusalem, Israel: Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2000.
Find full textEshel, Yohanan. Intergroup violence: Perspectives of dominant majority and a subordinate minority. [Haifa]: University of Haifa, 1996.
Find full textKhalīl, Shiqāqī, ed. Palestinian and Israeli public opinion: The public imperative in the second intifada. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press, 2010.
Find full textBarzilai, Gad. The use of force: Israeli public opinion on military options. Ramat Gan, Israel: BESA Center, Bar-Ilan University, 1996.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Israeli Public opinion"
Cavari, Amnon, and Guy Freedman. "Attitudes about the Arab-Israeli Conflict and US Involvement in the Region." In American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 49–87. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-5.
Full textA’si, Murad. "Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion and the Palestine Question." In Public Opinion and the Palestine Question, 143–201. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003399421-5.
Full textScheindlin, Dahlia. "Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion and the Two-State Solution." In Routledge Companion to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 463–80. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429027376-38.
Full textAvnery, Uri. "Changing Public Opinion in Israel." In Peacemakers in Israel-Palestine, 145–57. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003262817-14.
Full textCavari, Amnon, and Guy Freedman. "Studying American Attitudes Toward Israel." In American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 15–28. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-3.
Full textCavari, Amnon, and Guy Freedman. "Introduction." In American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 1–11. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-1.
Full textCavari, Amnon, and Guy Freedman. "The Nature of the Partisan Divide over Palestinian Independence." In American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 183–201. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-10.
Full textCavari, Amnon, and Guy Freedman. "Conclusion: A Conditional Relationship?" In American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 202–14. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-11.
Full textCavari, Amnon, and Guy Freedman. "Positive Affect in American Attitudes Toward Israel." In American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 29–48. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-4.
Full textCavari, Amnon, and Guy Freedman. "Demographic Divisions." In American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 91–128. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-7.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Israeli Public opinion"
Mitelman, Amichai, and Yahel Giat. "Transition to a Competitive Consultant Selection Method: A Case Study of a Public Agency in Israel." In InSITE 2022: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences. Informing Science Institute, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4926.
Full textGiat, Yahel, and Amichai Mitelman. "The Wisdom of the Crowds and Cost Overruns in Construction Project Tenders [Abstract]." In InSITE 2021: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences. Informing Science Institute, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4783.
Full text