Academic literature on the topic 'Investment arbitration reform'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Investment arbitration reform.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Investment arbitration reform"
De Brabandere, Eric. "Reforming Investment Law and Arbitration and the “New Economic World Order”: Between Myth and Reality." Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 114 (2020): 67–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/amp.2021.25.
Full textChoudhury, Barnali. "Democratic Implications Arising from the Intersection of Investment Arbitration and Human Rights." Alberta Law Review 46, no. 4 (August 1, 2009): 983. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/alr213.
Full textHodgson, Mélida N. "Reform and Adaptation: The Experience of the Americas with International Investment Law." Journal of World Investment & Trade 21, no. 1 (February 13, 2020): 140–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340170.
Full textDickson, Moses Oruaze. "Rebalancing international investment agreements in favour of host states." International Journal of Law and Management 60, no. 2 (March 12, 2018): 452–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-01-2017-0007.
Full textSharpe, Jeremy K. "Control, Capacity, and Legitimacy in Investment Treaty Arbitration." AJIL Unbound 112 (2018): 261–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aju.2018.69.
Full textGiorgetti, Chiara. "A Common Code of Conduct for Investment Arbitrators?" Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 113 (2019): 217–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/amp.2019.179.
Full textNjegovan, Milica. "Izazovi reforme mehanizma rešavanja investicionih sporova." Pravo i privreda 60, no. 3 (August 15, 2022): 557–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.55836/pip_22307a.
Full textGiorgetti, Chiara. "Selecting and Removing Arbitrators in International Investment Arbitration." Brill Research Perspectives in International Investment Law and Arbitration 2, no. 4 (September 10, 2018): 1–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24055778-12340007.
Full textJillani, Abid Hussain Shah, Rao Imran Habib, Muhammad Umair Razzaq, and Muhammad Muneeb Raza. "Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanisms under the Recovery of CalvoismReform Practices and way forward." Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 10, no. 3 (September 30, 2022): 1082–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2022.1003.0270.
Full textDimitropoulos, Georgios. "The Conditions for Reform: a Typology of “Backlash” and Lessons for Reform in International Investment Law and Arbitration." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 18, no. 3 (February 7, 2020): 416–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341411.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Investment arbitration reform"
Cosmas, Julius. "A critical assessment of the legitimacy of the international investment arbitration system: a call for reform." University of the Western Cape, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/4389.
Full textCurrently most international investment disputes are settled through arbitration. The origin of this dispute settlement system can be associated with the recent proliferation of over 3000 Bilateral Investment Treaties. Through this system disputes are settled by autonomous and differently constituted tribunals which have powers to render final and binding awards. The dissatisfied party has very limited opportunity to challenge the rendered award as there are no higher bodies in the hierarchy where a dissatisfied party can lodge an appeal, save for limited procedural challenges which are allowed under the system. These differently constituted tribunals at times reach diametrically opposed decisions on similar facts and those decisions stand side by side and all are considered valid. These inconsistent decisions are leading to lack of consistency and uniformity which in turn affects the legitimacy of the system as a whole. The rules of these institutions do not allow the proceedings to be held in public despite the fact that at times these tribunals question the regulatory powers of the state and state measures on service provision to its citizens. Another issue under the current system is that due to lack of coordination, arbitrators play dual roles: as counsels and arbitrators. This practice compromises the cherished principle of the rule of law. In the effort to address these concerns, stakeholders have suggested a number of possible solutions. The suggested solutions include: invoking res judicata and lis pendens principles; adopting the doctrine of precedent; applying the ‘fork in the road’ principle; adopting the margin of appreciation standard in interpretation of BITs; creating an appellate structure at ICSID and creating a treaty to treaty appellate body. This research submits that, the suggested solutions singularly and cumulatively don not address the legitimacy issues adequately. The research therefore calls for the establishment of a Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) in order to address the legitimacy issues cumulatively. It is submitted that establishing a Multilateral Investment Agreement (MAI) which provides for creating a standing international investment court with an appellate court is the only solution which addresses all the issues haunting the international investment dispute settlement system. In addition, the research suggests interim solutions which will help to increase the legitimacy of the current system pending the establishment of the MAI and the courts. The interim solutions include: establishment of the investor – state dispute adjudication Centre; effective utilisation of host state courts; mandatory publication of all awards; enhancing the effective use of member states interpretative statement; and forming a working commission to provide basic interpretation and the scope of the basic international investment law principles. These measures are only meant to improve the current system pending the establishment of the MAI and the courts. The research concludes that for the betterment of international investment law, the reform is inevitable and that the benefits would outweigh any demerits.
Rush, Tadhg. "An Investment Court System : Perpetuating or Reforming the Legitimacy Crisis in Investor-State Arbitration?" Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384391.
Full textLaurence, Marquis. "The Role of the European Union in the Systemic Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement in International and Regional Trade Agreements: The impact of the ISDS Reform on the Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators." Doctoral thesis, Luiss Guido Carli, 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/11385/222718.
Full textDrakopoulos, David. "Appeal mechanisms and Investment Court Systems in Investor-State Dispute Settlement : An analysis of AM and ICS suggestions, in light of contemporary reform." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-443417.
Full textWiesner-Lameth, Michelle [Verfasser], Ralph Alexander [Gutachter] Lorz, and Siegfried H. [Gutachter] Elsing. "Overcoming the Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration - Merit of the EU Reform Proposal vis-à-vis the Standard of Judicial Independence and Impartiality / Michelle Wiesner-Lameth ; Gutachter: Ralph Alexander Lorz, Siegfried H. Elsing." Düsseldorf : Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, 2018. http://d-nb.info/1164230344/34.
Full textWiesner-Lameth, Michelle [Verfasser], Ralph Alexander Gutachter] Lorz, and Siegfried H. [Gutachter] [Elsing. "Overcoming the Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration - Merit of the EU Reform Proposal vis-à-vis the Standard of Judicial Independence and Impartiality / Michelle Wiesner-Lameth ; Gutachter: Ralph Alexander Lorz, Siegfried H. Elsing." Düsseldorf : Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, 2018. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20180803-092613-4.
Full textFalcone, Thomas A. "Assessing Recent Proposals to Reform the Investment Treaty Arbitration System." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/5624.
Full textGraduate
Munzar, Tomáš. "Návrh Evropské komise ve věci reformy mechanismu řešení investičních sporů: komparativní analýza." Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-347635.
Full textBooks on the topic "Investment arbitration reform"
Alschner, Wolfgang. Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.001.0001.
Full textBehn, Daniel, Ole Kristian Fauchald, and Malcolm Langford, eds. The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration. Cambridge University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108946636.
Full textAlschner, Wolfgang. Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New Treaties, Old Outcomes. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2022.
Find full textFranck, Susan D. Arbitration Costs. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190054434.001.0001.
Full textJeswald W, Salacuse. 15 Investment Treaty Dispute Settlement. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198703976.003.0015.
Full textButt, Simon, and Tim Lindsey. Foreign Investment. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199677740.003.0018.
Full textHobe, Stephan, and Julian Scheu, eds. Evolution, Evaluation and Future Developments in International Investment Law. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748923756.
Full textAloysius P, Llamzon. Corruption in International Investment Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198714262.001.0001.
Full textSchill, Stephan W. Authority, Legitimacy, and Fragmentation in the (Envisaged) Dispute Settlement Disciplines in Mega-Regionals. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808893.003.0005.
Full textSt John, Taylor. Conversion. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789918.003.0008.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Investment arbitration reform"
Bjorklund, Andrea K., Susan D. Franck, C. Ignacio SuáRez Anzorena, Jan Paulsson, and Alejandro A. Escobar. "ICSID and Other Investment Arbitration Tribunals: Is There a Need for Judicial Oversight or Other Reforms?" In International Institutional Reform, 274–315. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-673-2_11.
Full textAlschner, Wolfgang. "Tax-Style Multilateralization." In Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 269–92. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0010.
Full textAlschner, Wolfgang. "Treaties as Data." In Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 23–46. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0002.
Full textAlschner, Wolfgang. "Evolution as Americanization." In Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 81–120. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0004.
Full textFranck, Susan D. "Introduction to Investment Treaty Arbitration (ITA) and Framing the Debate." In Arbitration Costs, 1–24. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190054434.003.0001.
Full textMohan, Mahdev, and Alexis Ang. "Singapore's Approach to ISDS Reform: ‘A Shift in Geography’ in Investment Law?" In Foreign Investment and Investment Arbitration in Asia, 251–72. Intersentia, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781780688404.010.
Full textAlschner, Wolfgang. "Introduction." In Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 1–20. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0001.
Full textAlschner, Wolfgang. "Reversing Innovation through MFN." In Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 123–52. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0005.
Full textAlschner, Wolfgang. "Overriding Differences through Custom." In Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 153–82. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0006.
Full textAlschner, Wolfgang. "Forward-Looking Interpretation." In Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, 219–44. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644386.003.0008.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Investment arbitration reform"
Ševčíková, Tereza. "Investment Arbitration Reform: Third-Party Funding in Investment Arbitration." In COFOLA International 2022. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0231-2022-8.
Full textTuncay, Ahmet. "Arbitration Rules in Turkish Legal System." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c04.00807.
Full text