Relevant bibliographies by topics / Interrater Reliability Trial

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Interrater Reliability Trial'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 25 June 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Interrater Reliability Trial.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Interrater Reliability Trial"

1

Korsholm-Rosfort, Tina, Simone Larsen, Thomas Aagaard, Gunn Ammitzbøll, and Susanne O. Dalton. "Interrater Reliability of Dynamic Muscle Testing After Breast Cancer Surgery in Women at High Risk of Lymphedema: To Improve Quality in Clinical Practice." Integrative Cancer Therapies 19 (January 2020): 153473542090380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735420903801.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: The purpose of this study is to determine the interrater reliability of dynamic muscle tests in the early rehabilitation phase in women after breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) based on the “preventive intervention against lymphedema after breast cancer” (LYCA) randomised controlled trial. Methods: Fifteen women treated with breast cancer surgery including ALND were recruited from participants in the LYCA trial. In this interrater reliability study, women were tested in 4 dynamic muscle tests by 2 physiotherapists at a Capital Hospital in Denmark. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to assess the relative reliability between raters. A Bland-Altman plot and limits of agreement were calculated to describe the absolute reliability. Results: All 6 subtests displayed high interrater reliability. ICC values were: leg press 0.96 (95% CI = 0.87-0.99), elbow flexion (contralateral) 0.94 (0.83-0.98), elbow flexion (affected arm) 0.93 (0.80-0.98), elbow extension 0.80 (0.41-0.93), shoulder abduction (contralateral) 0.89 (0.68-0.96), and shoulder abduction (affected arm) 0.91 (0.74-0.97). Cumulated interrater reliability for the test battery was very high (ICC = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.990-1.0). The absolute reliability of this study was considered high, and the absence of large shifts between mean and the line of 0 difference suggest no systematic bias that could influence clinical interpretation. Conclusions: The dynamic muscle tests evaluated in this study had high interrater reliability and can be used reliably in women in the postoperative phase after breast cancer surgery with ALND.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Albo, Michael E., Charles W. Nager, Philippe E. Zimmern, Mary Pat FitzGerald, Anne Stoddard, Heather J. Litman, and Susan McDermott. "INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF PRESSURE FLOW STUDY INTERPRETATION IN THE SISTER TRIAL." Journal of Urology 179, no. 4S (April 2008): 522–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(08)61539-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rockwood, Kenneth, David Strang, Chris MacKnight, Robert Downer, and John C. Morris. "Interrater Reliability of the Clinical Dementia Rating in a Multicenter Trial." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 48, no. 5 (May 2000): 558–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb05004.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cumming, Toby B., Danielle Lowe, Thomas Linden, and Julie Bernhardt. "The AVERT MoCA Data: Scoring Reliability in a Large Multicenter Trial." Assessment 27, no. 5 (June 7, 2018): 976–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191118771516.

Full text
Abstract:
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used cognitive screening tool in stroke. As scoring the visuospatial/executive MoCA items involves subjective judgement, reliability is important. Analyzing data on these items from A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT), we compared the original scoring of assessors ( n = 102) to blind scoring by a single, independent rater. In a sample of scoresheets from 1,119 participants, we found variable interrater reliability. The match between original assessors and the independent rater was the following: trail-making 97% (κ = 0.94), cube copy 90% (κ = 0.80), clock contour 92% (κ = 0.49), clock numbers 89% (κ = 0.67), and clock hands 72% (κ = 0.46). For all items except clock contour, the independent rater was “stricter” than the original assessors. Discrepancies were typically errors in original scoring, rather than borderline differences in subjective judgement. In trials that include the MoCA, researchers should emphasize scoring rules to assessors and implement independent data checking, especially for clock hands, to maximize accuracy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Skougaard, Marie, Henning Bliddal, Robin Christensen, Karen Ellegaard, Sabrina M. Nielsen, Jakub Zavada, Sabina Oreska, et al. "Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Acquire Sustainable Skills for Home Monitoring: A Prospective Dual-country Cohort Study (ELECTOR Clinical Trial I)." Journal of Rheumatology 47, no. 5 (August 15, 2019): 658–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181362.

Full text
Abstract:
Objective.In an eHealth setting, to investigate intra- and interrater reliability and agreement of joint assessments and Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and test the effect of repeated joint assessment training.Methods.Patients with DAS28-CRP ≤ 5.1 were included in a prospective cohort study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02317939). Intrarater reliability and agreement of patient-performed joint counts were assessed through completion of 5 joint assessments over a 2-month period. All patients received training on joint assessment at baseline; only half of the patients received repeated training. A subset of patients was included in an appraisal of interrater reliability and agreement comparing joint assessments completed by patients, healthcare professionals (HCP), and ultrasonography. Cohen’s κ coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for quantifying of reliability of joint assessments and DAS28-CRP. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.Results.Intrarater reliability was excellent with ICC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83–0.90) and minimal detectable change of 1.13. ICC for interrater reliability ranged between 0.69 and 0.90 (good to excellent). Patients tended to rate DAS28-CRP slightly higher than HCP. In patients receiving repeated training, a mean difference in DAS28-CRP of −0.08 was observed (limits of agreements of −1.06 and 0.90). After 2 months, reliability between patients and HCP was similar between groups receiving single or repeated training.Conclusion.Patient-performed assessments of joints and DAS28-CRP in an eHealth home-monitoring solution were reliable and comparable with HCP. Patients can acquire the necessary skills to conduct a correct joint assessment after initial and thorough training. [clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02317939)]
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Everton, Lisa F., Jacqueline K. Benfield, Emilia Michou, Shaheen Hamdy, and Philip M. Bath. "Reliability of the Penetration–Aspiration Scale and Temporal and Clearance Measures in Poststroke Dysphagia: Videofluoroscopic Analysis From the Swallowing Treatment using Electrical Pharyngeal Stimulation Trial." Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65, no. 3 (March 8, 2022): 858–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00083.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose: Information on reliability of outcome measures used to assess the effectiveness of interventions in dysphagia rehabilitation is lacking, particularly when used by different research groups. Here, we report on reliability of the penetration–aspiration scale (PAS) and temporal and clearance measures, determined using videofluoroscopy. Method: Secondary analysis used videofluoroscopies from the Swallowing Treatment using Electrical Pharyngeal Stimulation trial in subacute stroke. PAS scores (719 scores from 18 participants) were evaluated and compared to the original PAS scores from the trial. Five conditions were assessed, including reliability for every swallow and overall mean of the worst PAS score. Operational rules for assessing temporal and clearance measures were also developed using the same data, and reliability of these rules was assessed. Reliability of component-level and derivative-level scores was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted kappa. Results: Image quality was variable. Interrater reliability for the overall mean of the worst PAS score was excellent (ICC = .914, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.853, .951]) but moderate for every swallow in the bolus (ICC = .743, 95% CI [.708, .775]). Intrarater reliability for PAS was excellent (all conditions). Excellent reliability (both inter- and intrarater > .90) was seen for temporal measures of stage transition duration (ICC = .998, 95% CI [.993, .999] and ICC = .995, 95% CI [.987, .998], respectively) as well as initiation of laryngeal closure and pharyngeal transit time and all individual swallow events. Strong scores were obtained for some clearance measures; others were moderate or weak. Conclusions: Interrater reliability for PAS is acceptable but depends on how the PAS scores are handled in the analysis. Interrater reliability for most temporal measures was high, although some measures required additional training. No clearance measures had excellent reliability. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19090088
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hussain, Shaun A., Grace Kwong, John J. Millichap, John R. Mytinger, Nicole Ryan, Joyce H. Matsumoto, Joyce Y. Wu, Jason T. Lerner, and Raman Sankar. "Hypsarrhythmia assessment exhibits poor interrater reliability: A threat to clinical trial validity." Epilepsia 56, no. 1 (November 10, 2014): 77–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12861.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Mayes, Susan Dickerson, and Edward O. Bixler. "Reliability of Global Impressions for Assessing Methylphenidate Effects in Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder." Perceptual and Motor Skills 77, no. 3_suppl (December 1993): 1215–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.3f.1215.

Full text
Abstract:
Agreement between raters using global impressions to assess methylphenidate response was analyzed for children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) undergoing double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover methylphenidate trials. Caregivers were more likely to disagree than agree when asked to rate the children as “better, same, or worse” during each day of the trial. Over-all agreement was 42.9%, only 9.6% above what would be expected based on chance alone. Further, none of the interrater reliability coefficients (Cohen's kappa) for the individual children were statistically significant.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Haddad, Tufia, Jane M. Helgeson, Katharine E. Pomerleau, Anita M. Preininger, M. Christopher Roebuck, Irene Dankwa-Mullan, Gretchen Purcell Jackson, and Matthew P. Goetz. "Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence System for Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Screening: Retrospective Pilot Study." JMIR Medical Informatics 9, no. 3 (March 26, 2021): e27767. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27767.

Full text
Abstract:
Background Screening patients for eligibility for clinical trials is labor intensive. It requires abstraction of data elements from multiple components of the longitudinal health record and matching them to inclusion and exclusion criteria for each trial. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed to improve the efficiency and accuracy of this process. Objective This study aims to evaluate the ability of an AI clinical decision support system (CDSS) to identify eligible patients for a set of clinical trials. Methods This study included the deidentified data from a cohort of patients with breast cancer seen at the medical oncology clinic of an academic medical center between May and July 2017 and assessed patient eligibility for 4 breast cancer clinical trials. CDSS eligibility screening performance was validated against manual screening. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for eligibility determinations were calculated. Disagreements between manual screeners and the CDSS were examined to identify sources of discrepancies. Interrater reliability between manual reviewers was analyzed using Cohen (pairwise) and Fleiss (three-way) κ, and the significance of differences was determined by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results In total, 318 patients with breast cancer were included. Interrater reliability for manual screening ranged from 0.60-0.77, indicating substantial agreement. The overall accuracy of breast cancer trial eligibility determinations by the CDSS was 87.6%. CDSS sensitivity was 81.1% and specificity was 89%. Conclusions The AI CDSS in this study demonstrated accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of greater than 80% in determining the eligibility of patients for breast cancer clinical trials. CDSSs can accurately exclude ineligible patients for clinical trials and offer the potential to increase screening efficiency and accuracy. Additional research is needed to explore whether increased efficiency in screening and trial matching translates to improvements in trial enrollment, accruals, feasibility assessments, and cost.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ruud, Torleif, Karin Drivenes, Robert E. Drake, Vegard Øksendal Haaland, Matthew Landers, Bjørn Stensrud, Kristin S. Heiervang, Lars Tanum, and Gary R. Bond. "The Antipsychotic Medication Management Fidelity Scale: Psychometric properties." Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 47, no. 6 (February 6, 2020): 911–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01018-1.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The paper describes the Antipsychotic Medication Management Fidelity Scale and its psychometric properties, including interrater reliability, frequency distribution, sensitivity to change and feasibility. Fidelity assessors conducted fidelity reviews four times over 18 months at eight sites receiving implementation support for evidence-based antipsychotic medication management. Data analyses shows good to fair interrater reliability, adequate sensitivity to change over time and good feasibility. At 18 months, item ratings varied from poor to full fidelity on most items. Use of the scale can assess fidelity to evidence-based guidelines for antipsychotic medication management and guide efforts to improve practice. Further research should improve and better calibrate some items, and improve the procedures for access to information. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03271242.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Interrater Reliability Trial"

1

Kraemer, Helena Chmura. "Interrater Reliability." In Methods and Applications of Statistics in Clinical Trials, 334–39. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118596333.ch18.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Interrater Reliability Trial' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography