Academic literature on the topic 'Interopérabilité des systèmes de preuve'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Interopérabilité des systèmes de preuve.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Interopérabilité des systèmes de preuve"
Maroye, Laurence. "Interopérabilité des systèmes de management et automatisation." I2D - Information, données & documents 53, no. 4 (2016): 52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/i2d.164.0052.
Full textBaïna, Salah, Hervé Panetto, and Khalid Benali. "Apport de l'approche MDA pour une interopérabilité sémantique Interopérabilité des systèmes d'information d'entreprise." Ingénierie des systèmes d'information 11, no. 3 (June 24, 2006): 11–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3166/isi.11.3.11-29.
Full textHudon, Michèle. "ISO 25964 : pour le développement, la gestion et l’interopérabilité des langages documentaires." Documentation et bibliothèques 58, no. 3 (February 26, 2015): 130–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1028903ar.
Full textJost, Clémence. "Open data, open source et interopérabilité : les « éco » systèmes." Archimag N° 76, Hors série (September 18, 2024): 22–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/arma.hs76.0022.
Full textMônaco, Gustavo Ferraz de Campos. "LE PRINCIPE DE LA TOLÉRANCE COMME CONTOUR DE L’ORDRE PUBLIC: LA CIRCULATION DES MODÈLES FAMILIAUX AU BRÉSIL." PANORAMA OF BRAZILIAN LAW 4, no. 5-6 (May 26, 2018): 36–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.17768/pbl.v4i5-6.34426.
Full textMônaco, Gustavo Ferraz de Campos. "LE PRINCIPE DE LA TOLÉRANCE COMME CONTOUR DE L’ORDRE PUBLIC: LA CIRCULATION DES MODÈLES FAMILIAUX AU BRÉSIL." PANORAMA OF BRAZILIAN LAW 4, no. 5-6 (May 26, 2018): 36–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.17768/pbl.v4i5-6.p36-55.
Full textMônaco, Gustavo Ferraz de Campos. "LE PRINCIPE DE LA TOLÉRANCE COMME CONTOUR DE L’ORDRE PUBLIC: LA CIRCULATION DES MODÈLES FAMILIAUX AU BRÉSIL." PANORAMA OF BRAZILIAN LAW 4, no. 5-6 (May 31, 2017): 36–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.17768/pbl.y4.n5-6.p36-55.
Full textMônaco, Gustavo Ferraz de Campos. "LE PRINCIPE DE LA TOLÉRANCE COMME CONTOUR DE L’ORDRE PUBLIC: LA CIRCULATION DES MODÈLES FAMILIAUX AU BRÉSIL." PANORAMA OF BRAZILIAN LAW 4, no. 5-6 (May 26, 2018): 36–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.17768/pbl.y4n5-6.p36-55.
Full textGauthier, Y. "Sur la théorie des démonstrations." Articles 8, no. 2 (January 9, 2007): 273–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/203170ar.
Full textMarbach, Sophie. "S’inspirer du rein pour filtrer l’eau, ou comment réinventer la passoire." Reflets de la physique, no. 58 (June 2018): 20–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/refdp/201858020.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Interopérabilité des systèmes de preuve"
Cauderlier, Raphaël. "Object-Oriented Mechanisms for Interoperability Between Proof Systems." Thesis, Paris, CNAM, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016CNAM1065/document.
Full textDedukti is a Logical Framework resulting from the combination ofdependent typing and rewriting. It can be used to encode many logical systems using shallow embeddings preserving their notion of reduction. These translations of logical systems in a common format are a necessary first step for exchanging proofs between systems. This objective of interoperability of proof systems is the main motivation of this thesis.To achieve it, we take inspiration from the world of programming languages and more specifically from object-oriented languages because they feature advanced mechanisms for encapsulation, modularity, and default definitions. For this reason we start by a shallow translation of an object calculus to Dedukti. The most interesting point in this translation is the treatment of subtyping. Unfortunately, it seems very hard to incorporate logic in this object calculus. To proceed, object-oriented mechanisms should be restricted to static ones which seem enough for interoperability. Such a combination of static object-oriented mechanisms and logic is already present in the FoCaLiZe environment so we propose a shallow embedding of FoCaLiZe in Dedukti. The main difficulties arise from the integration of FoCaLiZe automatic theorem prover Zenon and from the translation of FoCaLiZe functional implementation language featuring two constructs which have no simple counterparts in Dedukti: local pattern matching and recursion. We then demonstrate how this embedding of FoCaLiZe to Dedukti can be used in practice for achieving interoperability of proof systems through FoCaLiZe, Zenon, and Dedukti. In order to avoid strengthening to much the theory in which the final proof is expressed, we use Dedukti as a meta-language for eliminating unnecessary axioms
Cauderlier, Raphaël. "Object-Oriented Mechanisms for Interoperability Between Proof Systems." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris, CNAM, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016CNAM1065.
Full textDedukti is a Logical Framework resulting from the combination ofdependent typing and rewriting. It can be used to encode many logical systems using shallow embeddings preserving their notion of reduction. These translations of logical systems in a common format are a necessary first step for exchanging proofs between systems. This objective of interoperability of proof systems is the main motivation of this thesis.To achieve it, we take inspiration from the world of programming languages and more specifically from object-oriented languages because they feature advanced mechanisms for encapsulation, modularity, and default definitions. For this reason we start by a shallow translation of an object calculus to Dedukti. The most interesting point in this translation is the treatment of subtyping. Unfortunately, it seems very hard to incorporate logic in this object calculus. To proceed, object-oriented mechanisms should be restricted to static ones which seem enough for interoperability. Such a combination of static object-oriented mechanisms and logic is already present in the FoCaLiZe environment so we propose a shallow embedding of FoCaLiZe in Dedukti. The main difficulties arise from the integration of FoCaLiZe automatic theorem prover Zenon and from the translation of FoCaLiZe functional implementation language featuring two constructs which have no simple counterparts in Dedukti: local pattern matching and recursion. We then demonstrate how this embedding of FoCaLiZe to Dedukti can be used in practice for achieving interoperability of proof systems through FoCaLiZe, Zenon, and Dedukti. In order to avoid strengthening to much the theory in which the final proof is expressed, we use Dedukti as a meta-language for eliminating unnecessary axioms
Hondet, Gabriel. "Expressing predicate subtyping in computational logical frameworks." Electronic Thesis or Diss., université Paris-Saclay, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022UPASG070.
Full textSafe programming as well as most proof systems rely on typing. The more a type system is expressive, the more these types can be used to encode invariants which are therefore verified mechanically through type checking procedures. Dependent types extend simple types by allowing types to depend on values. For instance, it allows to define the types of lists of a certain length. Predicate subtyping is another extension of simple type theory in which types can be defined by predicates. A predicate subtype, usually noted {x: A | P(x)}, is inhabited by elements t of type A for which P(t) is true. This extension provides an extremely rich and intuitive type system, which is at the heart of the proof assistant PVS, at the cost of making type checking undecidable.This work is dedicated to the encoding of predicate subtyping in Dedukti: a logical framework with computation rules. We begin with the encoding of explicit predicate subtyping for which the terms in {x: A | P(x)} and terms of Aare syntactically different. We show that any derivable judgement of predicate subtyping can be encoded into a derivable judgement of the logical framework. Predicate subtyping, is often used implicitly: with no syntactic difference between terms of type A and terms of type {x: A | P(x) }. We enrich our logical framework with a term refiner which can add these syntactic markers. This refiner can be used to refine judgements typed with implicit predicate subtyping into explicited judgements.The proof assistant PVS uses extensively predicate subtyping. We show how its standard library can be exported to Dedukti. Because PVS only store proof traces rather than complete proof terms, we sketch in the penultimate section a procedure to generate complete proof terms from these proof traces.The last section provides the architecture of a repository dedicated to the exchange of formal proofs. The goal of such a repository is to categorise and store proofs encoded in Dedukti to promote interoperability
Felicissimo, Thiago. "Generic bidirectional typing in a logical framework for dependent type theories." Electronic Thesis or Diss., université Paris-Saclay, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024UPASG049.
Full textDependent type theories are formal systems that can be used both as programming languages and for the formalization of mathematics, and constitute the foundation of popular proof assistants such as Coq and Agda. In order to unify their study, Logical Frameworks (LFs) provide a unified meta-language for defining such theories in which various universal notions are built in by default and metatheorems can be proven in a theory-independent way. This thesis focuses on LFs designed with implementation in mind, with the goal of providing generic type-checkers. Our main contribution is a new such LF which allows for representing type theories with their usual non-annotated syntaxes. The key to allowing the removal of annotations without jeopardizing decidability of typing is the integration of bidirectional typing, a discipline in which the typing judgment is decomposed into inference and checking modes. While bidirectional typing has been well known in the literature for quite some time, one of the central contributions of our work is that, by formulating it in an LF, we give it a generic treatment for all theories fitting our framework. Our proposal has been implemented in the generic type-checker BiTTs, allowing it to be used in practice with various theories. In addition to our main contribution, we also advance the study of Dedukti, a sibling LF of our proposed framework. First, we revisit the problem of showing that theories are correctly represented in Dedukti by proposing a methodology for encodings which allows for showing their conservativity easily. Furthermore, we demonstrate how Dedukti can be used in practice as a tool for translating proofs by proposing a transformation for sharing proofs with predicative systems. This transformation has allowed for the translation of proofs from Matita to Agda, yielding the first-ever Agda proofs of Fermat's Little Theorem and Bertrand's Postulate
Besançon, Léo. "Interopérabilité des Systèmes Blockchains." Thesis, Lyon, 2021. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03789639.
Full textBlockchains are a disruptive technology. They enable an ecosystem for decentralized applications with interesting properties: transaction transparency, application auditability or censorship resistance. It has applications in various fields, such as finance, healthcare or video games. It has evolved a lot since its creation in 2008, and presents numerous perspectives. However, the field faces many challenges, in particular a lack of interoperability at several levels: between projects on a same Blockchain, between different Blockchains, or between Blockchains and other systems. One important aspect of Blockchain systems interoperability is semantic interoperability. It relies on formal definitions of the related concepts. Another challenge is the design of decentralized Blockchain applications. These applications integrate Blockchain technology, but also other services that satisfy the constraints of the application that Blockchain is not suitable for. However, it is complex to choose the most suited Blockchain service for a given application. With this PhD work, we propose a framework that can improve interoperability for decentralized Blockchain applications. We achieve this with the design of a methodology and a Blockchain ontology that help formalize the concepts related to an application. This framework is validated in the context of Blockchain video game development. It is a complex use case, as it needs to share storage intensive data and satisfy the latency constraints
Kirchner, Florent. "Systèmes de preuve interopérables." Phd thesis, Ecole Polytechnique X, 2007. http://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00003192.
Full textSeyrat, Claude. "L' interopérabilité dans les systèmes d'indexation multimédia." Paris 6, 2003. http://www.theses.fr/2003PA066307.
Full textNowak, David. "Spécification et preuve de systèmes réactifs." Rennes 1, 1999. http://www.theses.fr/1999REN10094.
Full textCuggia, Marc. "Interopérabilité des systèmes d'information en santé et aspects sémantiques." Rennes 1, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008REN1B116.
Full textThe interoperability of health information systems is a major issue, since these systems are heterogeneous both in their areage of coverages, their structures and their contents. The objective of this work is to explore some aspects of interoperability, in particular the semantic aspects. The thesis is three parts structured. (i) An inventory of health information systems and the place of interoperability norms and standards in health domain. (ii) Modeling and experimental implementation information of a system for health care networks. (iii) Specific aspects of semantic issues are investigated through several studies, the difficulties to connect information models (HL7 here, OpenEHR) with models of knowledge (by SNOMED International, CT & LOINC)
Malet, Emmanuel. "Interopérabilité des systèmes d'IAO : les services de prototypage rapide." Reims, 2003. http://theses.univ-reims.fr/sciences/2003REIMS020.pdf.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Interopérabilité des systèmes de preuve"
LALANDE, Steffen, Abdelkrim BELOUED, and Odile FARGE. "La plateforme Okapi pour l’analyse et la publication de corpus de données audiovisuelles." In Corpus audiovisuels, 77–94. Editions des archives contemporaines, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.17184/eac.5702.
Full textFAGES, François, and Franck MOLINA. "La cellule, un calculateur analogique chimique." In Approches symboliques de la modélisation et de l’analyse des systèmes biologiques, 255–74. ISTE Group, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51926/iste.9029.ch7.
Full textBARBIER, Marc. "Erosion et sol-vivant en pays de caux." In Pratiques et savoirs agricoles dans la transition agroécologique, 119–38. Editions des archives contemporaines, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.17184/eac.3056.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Interopérabilité des systèmes de preuve"
Mussat, L., and D. Sabatier. "Modélisation et preuve de sécurité des systèmes du transport ferroviaire." In Congrès Lambda Mu 19 de Maîtrise des Risques et Sûreté de Fonctionnement, Dijon, 21-23 Octobre 2014. IMdR, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4267/2042/56145.
Full textAit-Ameur, Yamine, Idir Ait-Sadoune, Jean-Marc Mota, and Mickael Baron. "Validation et vérification formelles de systèmes interactifs multi-modaux fondées sur la preuve." In the 18th international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1132736.1132752.
Full text