Academic literature on the topic 'Intellectual property Australia'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Intellectual property Australia.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Intellectual property Australia"
Mitra-Kahn, Benjamin, Matthew Johnson, Bradley Man, and Luke Meehan. "Intellectual Property Government Open Data: Australian Business Number Links to All Intellectual Property Data in Australia." Australian Economic Review 49, no. 1 (March 2016): 96–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12147.
Full textCoulepis, Anthony. "Biotechnology Industry in Australia: Growing Fast." Asia-Pacific Biotech News 09, no. 16 (August 30, 2005): 769–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219030305000030.
Full textRichardson, Megan. "Sui Generis Intellectual Property Law Reform: Issues for Australia." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 32, no. 1 (March 5, 2001): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v32i1.5904.
Full textMaskus, Keith. "Strengthening Intellectual Property Rights in Asia: Implications for Australia." Australian Economic Papers 37, no. 3 (September 1998): 346–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00025.
Full textFaber-Castell, Natalie, and Richard Fletcher. "Case Study: Faber-Castell Australia defends its intellectual property." Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 17, no. 3 (September 2009): 182–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.06.009.
Full textBlakeney, Michael. "Intellectual property, biological diversity, and agricultural research in Australia." Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, no. 2 (2002): 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ar00153.
Full textMalbon, Justin. "The Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement: Trade Trumps Indigenous Interests." Media International Australia 111, no. 1 (May 2004): 34–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878x0411100106.
Full textAnderson, Jane. "The Making of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law in Australia." International Journal of Cultural Property 12, no. 3 (August 2005): 347–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0940739105050174.
Full textLAWSON, CHARLES, and CATHERINE PICKERING. "‘TRIPs‐plus’ patent privileges—an intellectual property ‘Cargo cult’ in Australia." Prometheus 22, no. 4 (December 2004): 355–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08109020412331311632.
Full textDevarapalli, Pratap, and Seema Soni. "Design rights for Start-ups: Drawing a line of protection." International Journal of Innovation 7, no. 2 (April 4, 2019): 312–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i2.332.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Intellectual property Australia"
Anderson, Jane Elizabeth Law Faculty of Law UNSW. "The production of indigenous knowledge in intellectual property law." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. School of Law, 2003. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/20491.
Full textRimmer, Matthew Rhys. "The pirate bazaar the social life of copyright law." View electronic text, 2001. http://eprints.anu.edu.au/documents/disk0/00/00/08/14/index.html.
Full textLamlert, Wariya. "International uncertainty in the exceptions for individual use in copyright law : a comparative study of Australia and Thailand /." Canberra, 2007. http://erl.canberra.edu.au/public/adt-AUC20080912.140432/index.html.
Full textForsyth, Guy, and N/A. "A minimalist sui generis legislative proposal for the application of common law principles to the protection of computer software." University of Canberra. Law, 1998. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20090714.142532.
Full textLudlow, Karinne Anne. "Which little piggy to market? : legal challenges to the commercialisation of agricultural genetically modified organisms in Australia." Monash University, Faculty of Law, 2004. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/5489.
Full textShay, Richard Michael. "Users' entitlements under the fair dealing exceptions to copyright." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/71691.
Full textIncludes bibliography
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This thesis analyses current South African copyright law to ascertain the proper interpretation and application of the fair dealing provisions contained in the Copyright Act 98 of 1978. Copyright law ensures that authors’ works are not used without their consent, which they can grant subject to compensation or conditions attached to the use. Fair dealing exceptions allow the general public to use copyright works for certain purposes without the copyright owner’s consent and without paying compensation. These provisions are intended to balance copyright owners’ interests with the interest that members of the public have in using copyright works for socially beneficial purposes. These provisions typically allow the use of a copyright work for the purposes of research or private study, personal or private use, criticism and review, and news reporting. Unfortunately there is no South African case law concerning the fair dealing provisions, and the application of these exceptions remains unclear. This study aims to clarify the extent of application of the fair dealing exceptions to copyright infringement so that courts may be more willing to consider foreign and international law and in doing so develop South African intellectual property law. The social and economic policy considerations underlying the fair dealing exceptions are considered to determine their function. International conventions relating to copyright and neighbouring rights are examined, specifically the provisions allowing exceptions to copyright. The legislation and case law of Australia and the United Kingdom are analysed to determine the proper interpretation and application of these statutory defences. This knowledge is then used to inform South African law. The Copyright Act 98 of 1978 does not contain a fair dealing exception for parody and satire. Australian legislation does contain such an exception, and it is analysed in that context. An exception for parody is proposed for South African law, and the need for and application of this provision is considered. The constitutionality of the proposed exception is evaluated in terms of its impact on the constitutional property rights of copyright owners.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie tesis ondersoek Suid-Afrikaanse outeursreg om die behoorlike uitleg en toepassing van die “billike gebruik”-bepalings in die Wet op Outeursreg 98 van 1978 te bepaal. Outeursreg beskerm die werk van ʼn outeur teen ongemagtigde gebruik van haar intellektuele eiendom. Gebruik kan deur die outeur gemagtig word, òf teen vergoeding òf onderhewig aan bepaalde voorwaardes. Artikels 12-19B (die billike gebruik-bepalings) van die Wet op Outeursreg laat ander toe om sekere werke te gebruik sonder die toestemming van die eienaar van die werk en sonder om vergoeding te betaal. Die bepalings streef om ʼn balans te tref tussen die belange van die outeur en die belange van die publiek. ʼn Werk mag volgens hierdie bepalings tipies gebruik word vir die doeleindes van navorsing of private studie, persoonlike of private gebruik, beoordeling of resensie, of om nuus te rapporteer. Daar is tans geen Suid-Afrikaanse regspraak rakende hierdie uitsonderings nie, en hul toepassing is dus onseker. Hierdie tesis beoog om die werking van die billike gebruik-bepalings duidelik uiteen te sit om hoër gewilligheid in howe te skep om internasionale en buitelandse reg toe te pas, en sodoende Suid-Afrikaanse immateriële goederereg te ontwikkel. Die sosiale en ekonomiese beleidsoorwegings wat die bepalings ondersteun word geanaliseer om die doel daarvan te bepaal. Internasionale outeursreg-verdragte word bespreek om ʼn raamwerk vir die uitsonderings te skep. Wetgewing en regspraak van Australië en die Verenigde Koninkryk word ondersoek, en die kennis wat daar opgedoen word, word toegepas op die Suid-Afrikaanse bepalings. Die Wet op Outeursreg 98 van 1978 bevat geen uitsondering vir die doeleindes van parodie en satire nie. Die Australiese Wet op Outeursreg 63 van 1968 bevat wel so ʼn uitsondering, en dit word in hierdie verband beoordeel. ʼn Uitsondering vir parodie en satire word voorgestel en oorweeg in die konteks van Suid-Afrikaanse outeursreg. Die grondwetlikheid van die voorgestelde uitsondering word bepaal na aanleiding van die impak wat dit sal hê op outeurs se eiendomsreg.
Mason, Renate Surveying & Spatial Information Systems Faculty of Engineering UNSW. "Developing Australian Spatial Data Policies - Existing Practices and Future Strategies." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. Surveying and Spatial Information Systems, 2002. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/18646.
Full textHelth, Ulrich. "Der Schutz der kommerziellen Aspekte der Persönlichkeit im australischen Recht /." Baden-Baden : Nomos, 2007. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=016139809&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
Full textLoff, Beatrice. "Health and human rights : case studies in the potential contribution of a human rights framework to the analysis of health questions." Monash University, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, 2004. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/5291.
Full textPavis, Mathilde Goizane Alice. "The author-performer divide in intellectual property law : a comparative analysis of the American, Australian, British and French legal frameworks." Thesis, University of Exeter, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10871/23692.
Full textBooks on the topic "Intellectual property Australia"
Griffith, P. B. C. (Phillip B. C.), author, Bannister Judith author, and Liberman Adam 1952 author, eds. Intellectual property in Australia. Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2013.
Find full textMcKeough, J. Intellectual property in Australia. 3rd ed. Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004.
Find full textMcKeough, J. Intellectual property in Australia. Sydney: Butterworths, 1991.
Find full textStewart, Andrew. Intellectual property in Australia. 4th ed. Chatswood, N.S.W: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2010.
Find full textIntellectual property law in Australia. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010.
Find full textDavison, Mark J. Australian intellectual property law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Find full textDavison, Mark J. Australian intellectual property law. 2nd ed. Port Melbourne, Vic: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Find full textEmerging challenges in intellectual property. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Find full textCriminology, Australian Institute of. Intellectual property crime and enforcement in Australia. Canberra, A.C.T: Australian Institute of Criminology, 2008.
Find full textBowrey, Kathy. Australian intellectual property: Commentary, law, and practice. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Intellectual property Australia"
Jedličková, Barbora, Julie Clarke, and Sitesh Bhojani. "Australia." In LIDC Contributions on Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition, 43–76. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27158-3_2.
Full textJedličková, Barbora, and Julie Clarke. "Australia." In LIDC Contributions on Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition, 41–68. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45753-5_2.
Full textJedličková, Barbora, and Julie Clarke. "Australia." In LIDC Contributions on Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition, 41–89. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71419-6_2.
Full textClarke, Julie, and Barbora Jedličková. "Australia." In LIDC Contributions on Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition, 33–68. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55813-4_2.
Full textMcCracken, Sheelagh. "Security Rights in Intellectual Property in Australia." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 47–84. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44191-3_2.
Full textFrankel, Susy, and Megan Richardson. "Limits of Free Trade Agreements: The New Zealand/Australia Experience." In MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 315–33. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30888-8_11.
Full textSuzor, Nicolas, Rachel Choi, and Kylie Pappalardo. "Moments of Flux in Intermediary Liability for Copyright Infringement in Australia." In Global Governance of Intellectual Property in the 21st Century, 129–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31177-7_8.
Full textYan, Henry. "The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement and the Choice of Intellectual Property Interest Balance in the Two Countries." In Free Trade Agreements, 119–37. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3038-4_7.
Full textvan Mosseveld, Anneke. "Military Control over Intellectual Property." In The Australian Army Uniform and the Government Clothing Factory, 187–205. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71425-7_9.
Full textWishart, Kane. "Management of Intellectual Property in Australia’s Clean Technology Sector: Challenges and Opportunities in an Uncertain Regulatory Environment." In Intellectual Property and Clean Energy, 177–206. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2155-9_7.
Full textReports on the topic "Intellectual property Australia"
Prysyazhnyi, Mykhaylo. UNIQUE, BUT UNCOMPLETED PROJECTS (FROM HISTORY OF THE UKRAINIAN EMIGRANT PRESS). Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2021.50.11093.
Full text