Academic literature on the topic 'Intellectual Property'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Intellectual Property.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Intellectual Property"
S.DINESH, S. DINESH, and Dr Jayadev Pati Dr. Jayadev Pati. "Intellectual Property." Indian Journal of Applied Research 4, no. 7 (October 1, 2011): 271–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/july2014/84.
Full textPandey, Shivam Kumar. "Economics of Intellectual Property Rights." International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews 4, no. 4 (April 23, 2023): 4230–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.4.423.37708.
Full textShoaf, Judy. "Intellectual Property." IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies 36, no. 1 (April 15, 2004): 63–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/iallt.v36i1.8399.
Full textShoaf, Judy. "Intellectual Property." IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies 36, no. 2 (October 15, 2004): 65–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/iallt.v36i2.8414.
Full textShoaf, Judy. "Intellectual Property." IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies 37, no. 1 (April 15, 2005): 79–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/iallt.v37i1.8431.
Full textIbrahimi, MSc Shpresa. "Intellectual property." ILIRIA International Review 2, no. 1 (June 30, 2012): 202. http://dx.doi.org/10.21113/iir.v2i1.171.
Full textSlack, M. "Intellectual property." Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 104, no. 3 (May 2022): 128–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsbull.2022.49.
Full textCaddy, Victor. "Intellectual Property." Business Law Review 35, Issue 3 (June 1, 2014): 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bula2014018.
Full textKirby, Ian. "Intellectual Property." Business Law Review 20, Issue 10 (October 1, 1999): 243–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bula1999071.
Full textÜniversitesi AVRUPA TOPLULUĞU ENSTİTÜSÜ, Marmara. "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY." Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 2, no. 1&2 (2015): 271–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/mjes.370.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Intellectual Property"
Berardi, Christopher W. (Christopher Walter). "Intellectual property and architecture : how architecture influences intellectual property lock-in." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/112005.
Full textThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
"June 2017." Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 237-247).
Intellectual property lock-in is a wicked problem particularly pervasive under monopsony market structures, such as the Department of Defense (DoD). However, little research exists on the mechanisms of action that induce intellectual property lock-in. This work postulates the conjuncture of architecture and intellectual property is one such mechanism of action and erects a research methodology to investigate this link. This dissertation began with a review of literature, which revealed more research is needed into basic trends or estimates of magnitude for intellectual property lock-in. To quantitatively frame the magnitude of the problem an investigation was conducted into all DoD contracts for the last eight fiscal years to establish bounds. These results were used to formulate a conceptual model of the problem and suggest the concept of intellectual property architecture, which is the conjuncture of architecture and intellectual property. To investigate links between intellectual property architecture and lock-in, an intermediate-N fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis research approach was formulated and executed using 14 DoD software cases representing over 34 million lines of code. The model used three input conditions: high quality technical architecture, accessible intellectual property architecture, and unlimited rights to study the avoidance of lock-in. The fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis concluded intellectual property architecture or unlimited rights were quasi-necessary conditions for the avoidance of lock-in. Additionally the model yielded both a five condition conservative expression and two condition parsimonious expression for sufficient conditions. From those expressions, this research concludes three direct findings. First, intellectual property architecture is an empirically supported mechanism of action for the avoidance of lock-in. Implying, intellectual property architecture, absent any other explanatory conditions, is sufficient to avoid lock-in. Second, the research herein finds evidence to support a novel taxonomy of intellectual property architectures. Allowing practitioners to understand potential trade-offs between architecture and intellectual property lock-in. Third, intellectual property architecture or unlimited rights is a theoretically supported expression for the avoidance of lock-in. This finding implies that as few as two conditions are required to understand whether a case may, or may not, avoid lock-in.
by Christopher W. Berardi.
Ph. D. in Engineering Systems
Pamp, Caroline. "Intellectual property in science /." Stockholm : Jure Förlag, 2010. http://www.hgu.gu.se/Files/fakultetskansli/abstract/Spikblad%20Caroline_Pamp.pdf.
Full textFraessdorf, Henning. "Intellectual property in standards." Thesis, McGill University, 2002. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=78214.
Full textThe thesis evaluates the soundness of a general argument of standardization for weaker protection in intellectual property law. It elaborates the arguments that are put forward to justify weaker protection in standards regarding the characteristics of standards and standardization as well as the justifications for intellectual property. It analyses the applicability of trademark, copyright and patent law to both already existing as well as developing standards. In particular, the concepts of genericness and descriptiveness in trademark law, the merger and scenes a faire doctrines in copyright law and the doctrines of patent misuse and patent abuse in patent law are discussed.
Bauer, Julia, Nikolaus Franke, and Philipp Türtscher. "Intellectual Property Norms in Online Communities: How User-Organized Intellectual Property Regulation Supports Innovation." INFORMS, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0649.
Full textSchroeder, Jeffrey S. "Right grantors and right seekers : a theory for understanding the comparative development of intellectual property rights /." view abstract or download file of text, 2001. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/uoregon/fullcit?p3004002.
Full textTypescript. Includes vita and abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 260-272). Also available for download via the World Wide Web; free to University of Oregon users.
Braun, Marcel. "Managing Intellectual Property in China." St. Gallen, 2007. http://www.biblio.unisg.ch/org/biblio/edoc.nsf/wwwDisplayIdentifier/02605160001/$FILE/02605160001.pdf.
Full textMyers, Robert A. "Intellectual Property Rights in Japan." MIT Japan Program, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7542.
Full textAntons, Christoph Hubert Jakob. "Intellectual property law in Indonesia /." The Hague [u.a.] : Kluwer Law International, 2000. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/31965043X.pdf.
Full textMacBeth, John Stuart. "Dynamically reconfigurable intellectual property cores." Thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.273843.
Full textAhuja, Rishi. "Intellectual property : strategy and policy." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76923.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 70-73).
The thesis that follows is an attempt to gain a deeper understanding of intellectual property from a policy as well as a strategic perspective. While the discussion that follows is applicable to intellectual property in general, the focus of this thesis is on a particular aspect of intellectual property i.e patents. Policy and strategic perspectives are covered in section I and 11 respectively. The section on policy explores the origin and evolution of intellectual property related policies by discussing key legislation and court cases. The two questions that were most relevant when exploring the policy side of the patent system were: -- Is the intellectual property system hindering or encouraging innovation? -- What changes, if any, are required to make the system more effective? The section on strategy looks at IP strategies (or lack thereof) of three leading companies, Apple, Google and Microsoft. These three companies were selected because of their apparently differing strategies and this cursory judgement was confirmed when the strategies of the companies were put under a microscope. The question that were central while exploring the strategic aspects of intellectual property were: -- How are these three companies coping with the patent system as it exists today? -- What changes can make the strategies employed more effective? The summary section at the end tries to reconcile these two different ways of looking at the intellectual property system into a coherent whole.
by Rishi Ahuja.
S.M.in Engineering and Management
Books on the topic "Intellectual Property"
Ng, Max Chee Weng. Intellectual property. Singapore: LexisNexis, 2002.
Find full textSpencer, Maria, and Mark Gagnon. Intellectual Property. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781071865101.
Full textParr, Russell L. Intellectual Property. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119419235.
Full textFitzgerald, Anne. Intellectual property. 2nd ed. Pyrmont, N.S.W: Lawbook Co., 2002.
Find full textSin, Lim Daniel Ying, and Loke Adrian Weng Hong, eds. Intellectual property. 2nd ed. Singapore: LexisNexis, 2010.
Find full textJennifer, Peloso, ed. Intellectual property. Bronx, N.Y: H.W. Wilson Co., 2003.
Find full textBainbridge, David I. Intellectual property. 7th ed. Harlow, Essex, England: Pearson Longman, 2009.
Find full textBarrett, Margreth. Intellectual property. 2nd ed. Austin: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2009.
Find full text1955-, Drahos Peter, ed. Intellectual property. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1999.
Find full textSchwabach, Aaron. Intellectual Property. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2008.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Intellectual Property"
Lawson, Charles. "Intellectual Property." In Socio-Economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation, 177–88. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9440-9_12.
Full textStarr, Ian. "Intellectual Property." In The European Marketplace, 359–73. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11344-6_32.
Full textBesen, Stanley M. "Intellectual Property." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 1006–10. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_191.
Full textTullock, Gordon. "Intellectual Property." In Direct Protection of Innovation, 171–99. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1265-1_7.
Full textCasey, Paul, and Michael Pecht. "Intellectual Property." In Lead-free Electronics, 663–82. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/047000780x.ch12.
Full textRubin, E. Leonard. "Intellectual Property." In The Handbook of Fraud Deterrence, 383–97. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119202165.ch20.
Full textHoffman, Harvey F. "Intellectual Property." In The Engineering Capstone Course, 113–22. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05897-9_7.
Full textMunro, Deborah. "Intellectual Property." In DIY MEMS, 171–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33073-6_17.
Full textClougherty, R. J. "Intellectual Property." In Re-imagining the Creative University for the 21st Century, 61–69. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-458-1_4.
Full textWalters, Robert, Leon Trakman, and Bruno Zeller. "Intellectual Property." In Data Protection Law, 293–315. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8110-2_12.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Intellectual Property"
Gileva, O. S. "Intellectual property." In ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ НАУКИ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ. НИЦ «Л-Журнал», 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/lj-02-2019-55.
Full textLysaght, P. "Soft IP block design considerations." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000407.
Full textCarpenter, D. A. "Gaining a better understanding of VHDL designs through pattern-based analysis." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000408.
Full textKadim, H. J. "Robust parameter identification for virtual test of systems on a chip." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000409.
Full textSezer, S. "VHDL package GUI." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000410.
Full textBoyle, S. "IP4EVAL: improving technical decision making in the IP design process." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000411.
Full textFairlie, R. R. "IP reuse - pitfalls and providence." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000412.
Full textPalmer, P. J. "Strategic re-use of IP within a modern business environment." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000413.
Full textDowney, D. "Test wrapper concepts and implementations." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000414.
Full textHellmich, H. H. "Re-usable low power DSP IP embedded in an ARM based SoC architecture." In IEE Seminar on Intellectual Property. IEE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20000415.
Full textReports on the topic "Intellectual Property"
Lanjouw, Jean Olson, and Mark Schankerman. Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, December 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w8656.
Full textLakdawalla, Darius, Tomas Philipson, and Y. Richard Wang. Intellectual Property and Marketing. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w12577.
Full textBoldrin, Michele, and David Levine. Growth and Intellectual Property. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, December 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w12769.
Full textStory, Alan. Intellectual Property and Computer Software. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_ip_20040501d.
Full textCorrea, Carlos M. Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_ip_20080820.
Full textShavell, Steven, and Tanguy van Ypersele. Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, February 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w6956.
Full textGrossman, Gene, and Edwin L. C. Lai. International Protection of Intellectual Property. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, January 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w8704.
Full textde Rassenfosse, Gaétan, Adam Jaffe, and Joel Waldfogel. Intellectual Property and Creative Machines. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w32698.
Full textKim, Linsu. Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_ip_20030601a.
Full textSpence, Malcolm. Negotiating Trade, Innovation and Intellectual Property. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_pb_20090908.
Full text