Academic literature on the topic 'Innovation participative'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Innovation participative.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Innovation participative"
Castiaux, Annick, and Sophie Paque. "Participative innovation: when innovation becomes everyone's business." International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 10, no. 2 (2009): 111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijeim.2009.025177.
Full textYAN, JUN. "AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GOAL ORIENTATION, PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP AND TASK CONFLICT ON INNOVATION IN SMALL BUSINESS." Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 16, no. 03 (September 2011): 393–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1084946711001896.
Full textChang, Yi-Ying, Ian Hodgkinson, Paul Hughes, and Che-Yuan Chang. "The mediation between participative leadership and employee exploratory innovation." Leadership & Organization Development Journal 40, no. 3 (May 13, 2019): 334–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/lodj-07-2018-0245.
Full textLeontev, Mikhail. "Socio-psychological aspects of innovation behavior of workers in construction organizations." MATEC Web of Conferences 251 (2018): 05021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201825105021.
Full textKacem, Sondes, and Sana El Harbi. "Leadership, Innovation Among Tunisian ICT SMEs." Journal of Enterprising Culture 22, no. 03 (September 2014): 283–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218495814500125.
Full textBrodtkorb, Kari, Ragnhild Skaar, and Åshild Slettebø. "The importance of leadership in innovation processes in nursing homes: An integrative review." Nordic Journal of Nursing Research 39, no. 3 (February 27, 2019): 127–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2057158519828140.
Full textGrabow, Niels, Volkmar Senz, and Klaus-Peter Schmitz. "Cardiovascular, ophthalmologic and otolaryngologic medical device innovations – Progress report 2021 from the Twenty20 consortium RESPONSE." Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering 7, no. 2 (October 1, 2021): 711–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2021-2181.
Full textNicholson, Kirstie. "Collaborative, Creative, Participative: Trends in Public Library Innovation." Public Library Quarterly 38, no. 3 (January 30, 2019): 331–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2019.1571399.
Full textKesting, Peter, John Parm Ulhøi, Lynda Jiwen Song, and Hongyi Niu. "The impact of leadership styles on innovation - a review." Journal of Innovation Management 3, no. 4 (January 24, 2016): 22–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_003.004_0004.
Full textGarud, Raghu, and Arvind Karunakaran. "Process-based ideology of participative experimentation to foster identity-challenging innovations: The case of Gmail and AdSense." Strategic Organization 16, no. 3 (June 14, 2017): 273–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127017708583.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Innovation participative"
Murase, Toshio. "The effects of participative safety and support for innovation on group creativity." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 2006. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/3051.
Full textLafitte, Laurence. "L’Architecture scolaire participative en milieu rural comme expression d'un nouveau modèle de développement local : Étude comparative de deux projets d’école « expérimentés » dans des communes bretonnes de moins de 500 habitants." Thesis, CY Cergy Paris Université, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020CYUN1073.
Full textAs a physical incarnation of the principles and symbols conveyed by the educational establishment and as a space projection of its organization, school architecture partly defines the behaviors and the individual and collective representations. It is registered on the long-term territory and influence the development of the generations to come. In an economic situation of globalisation of the education of the children, of territorialisation of the school question and decentralisation of architectural competence, school architecture is today forced to integrate either only dimensions teaching but also social dimensions, cultural and policies of the local context which are articulated between them, interfere to compose a global project which results in particular in the widening of the pedagogical team and the development of the partnerships, the mutualisation of spaces to extra-curricular activities, the opening on the city, the village and the territory. What all the more complexes the architectural order of the contemporary schools, and makes null and void the idea to design a model of school idéaltype 21st century and to think the configuration of school spaces and their installations without associating the users with it. Thus the promotion of a school modern, open on its social environment and connected to the world, lets conjecture the need for reconsidering school architecture but also for re-examining its modus operandi. In a legislative environment favourable with the implication of the citizens in the public affairs and in particular favorable to the participation citizen in the projects of public infrastructures and urban development in general, some communes make the choice of participative architecture for the construction of their school. Far from being only one simple scale of intervention, the room is an observation post privileged to apprehend the total world in change. The participation like mode of action local, closely related to the concept of participative democracy, in the reinforcement of the power of the actors to act on their destiny (empowerment) or on the contrary translates does take part a political instrumentalisation of the approach at consensual ends ou/et with the service of the process of neo-liberal individuation ? In other words which is the educational, sociological significance and policy of such a approach in the school sphere ? This work of thesis thus proposes to analyze the participative process causing construction of a school in rural environment in order to clarify the importance of the links between the school and its territory and to see how they act and evolve. Which can be the interpretation of a strong relation to the territory of proximity in a world governed by the globalisation of the exchanges, the networks and the standardization of the cultural and educational modes ? Which can be its advantages and the answers which it can give to the educational offer in terms of environment, local development, citizenship and living together ? For this reason does participative school architecture constitute a tool of social change of the rural world ? In other words, is the collaborative development of a school in rural environment the translation of the emergence of a new local development model, based on the participative relational mode ?
Abdourahman, Djama Idyle. "La sélection participative : un mode alternatif d'innovation environnementale en agriculture : trois essais en économie." Thesis, Grenoble, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013GRENE014.
Full textThis thesis provides an economic analysis of an alternative mode of innovation in the seed sector : Participatory Plant Breeding (PPB). PPB is defined as the involvement of users in the plant breeding process and typically consists in the collaboration of farmers and scientists who become co-researchers. These programs aim at developing local varieties adapted to sustainable agriculture.In the seed sector, regulation plays a key role: a stringent market approval process limits the seeds on the market to pre-defined types of varieties. Marketing rules also influence the orientation of plant breeding and limit the exchanges of farmers’ seeds. In chapter 1, the economic rationale of the seed regulation, its limits and possible alternatives are analyzed. Chapter 2 consists of a case study on the farmers’ motivations for participating in PPB projects. This multifaceted question enables to study the economic, environmental and societal issues at stake. Farmers’ motives are indeed directly related to the history of seed research, the limits of the intensive agricultural model and its environmental impacts, the seed industry’s structure and the regulatory framework. Finally, a theoretical model represents the strategic interactions between commercial and farmers’ seeds. The impacts in terms of price, profit, market coverage, pollutions and social welfare are explored
Korsvold, Torbjørn. "Creating organizational change and innovation : An action research oriented study of participative organizational change and innovation in the Norwegian AEC industry." Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, 2002. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-60.
Full textThis thesis contributes to the understanding of how to create organizational change and innovation in companies of the Norwegian Architects, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. The thesis, then, inquires into the conditions necessary for how the collective practice of collaboration and execution in building projects can be changed emphasizing the emancipatory potential of conversations in arenas for dialogue. The aim is to achieve new useful collective practice in projects, which in the end entails increased competitiveness for the companies involved. This implies that organizational change and innovation ultimately encompass the total value-creating chain of all the actors involved in the building project. That means all from the finished building including the physical construction process on the building site and the end-consumers that are going to use or own it, to the initial programming stage with the first drawing sketches of the architect. The thesis will argue that organizational change and innovation in AEC companies does not emerge on its own through for instance “linear-control” oriented models of planning and subsequent plan implementation or models for increased managerial project control. To the contrary, the thesis will show that processes of change and innovation are created through active and broad participation by all actors directly involved in the project, companies as well as single individuals in arenas for dialogue. The objective of this thesis, then, is to contribute to how organizational change and innovation can be created, that is; what are the conditions necessary to achieve organizational change and innovation in AEC companies? And next; how can organizational change and innovation be spread among the companies in the Norwegian AEC industry? These are the two major research questions of the study. The thesis is an action research-oriented case study based on collaboration with a Research & Development (R&D)-program called The Integrated Building Process (the SiB – Samspillet i Byggeprosessen) jointly sponsored by four Norwegian AEC companies and the Research Council of Norway (RCN). My doctoral grant, including abroad stay as a visiting research scholar at Stanford University, California, USA, summer 1998 and fall 1999, was 100 % sponsored by the RCN, the Industry and Energy division. The field research was carried out in a 4 ½-years period from 1997 to 2001.
Slim, épouse Kilani Hekma. "Le nouveau consommateur : une source d'enrichissement aux entreprises pour le développement de nouveaux produits ou services ?" Thesis, Paris 13, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA131004.
Full textThe present thesis was interested in the modeling of the co-creation of product and the service in a context of collaboration of companies and consumers. In the process of innovation, the model demonstrates the importance of taking into account 11 variables facilitators. In particular, the knowledge management and the categories of consumers. After a state of the art on the literature, a qualitative phase allowed to enrich the theretical framework experiment was implemented with 230 innovative companies. The quantitative analysis of the data allowed the validation of the model. 20 hypotheses were tested of which 16 have been completed, so allowing to demonstrate that the co-creation with the consumers allows for companies an enrichment of the process of innovation. All the components of the model allows a contribution for the management and the avenues of research for the innovative companies
Etienne, Bouyer Fanny. "Risque trypanosomien et innovation : le cas des éleveurs d'Afrique de l’Ouest." Thesis, Montpellier, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015MONTS107/document.
Full textAfrican animal trypanosomosis, transmitted by tsetse flies, are among the main animal health constraints to the development and intensification of cattle production in sub-Saharan Africa. Their control relies on two major strategies: the farmer-based control aiming at controlling the disease in order to allow a cost-effective production, and the centralized state intervention mostly targeting the eradication of the vector and the disease. This second strategy recently spread in the framework of the Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Eradication Campaign (PATTEC), coordinated by the African Union. I aimed to characterize the innovation capacities of livestock producers facing this animal health risk and vice versa the effect of risk control on innovation trajectories of livestock farmers. The study area concerned two west african countries: Burkina Faso and Senegal. In Senegal, we developed an original cost-benefit approach of the eradication program, and showed that the expected benefits mainly relie on innovation, thanks to the productivity benefits resulting from the shift from livestock breeding systems using the trypanotolerant Djakoré breed toward improved livestock breeding systems using more productive trypanosensible cattle breeds. In Burkina Faso (Mouhoun basin), the goals were to characterize the risk assessment by livestock producers, farmer-based control strategies and their capacities to adopt a new control method against tsetse flies, the insecticide footbath. At last, in order to understand and predict the impact of the evolution of the trypanosomosis risk on innovation trajectories of livestock producers and to improve the economic analysis of the eradication campaign in Senegal, a cross-sectional analysis of 10 case studies allowed identifying and characterizing the local dynamics of innovation, the rationales for action and the indicators of innovation capacities of the different groups of livestock producers. In the two study areas, the dynamism of socio-technical networks which livestock farmers belonged to and the ways they were mobilized allowed to understand the impact of this animal health risk on innovation capacities of the livestock producers. These processes were studied by mobilizing an innovation theory, the ANT (Actor Network Theory) and combining inquiry methods by questionnaires, methods of participatory epidemiology and a comprehensive socio-technical analysis inspired from the GERDAL’s method (Groupe d’Expérimentation et de Recherche, Développement et Actions Localisées). In perspective, advances linked to this work in the field of the hybridization between veterinary and social sciences are discussed, and few potential ways of improvement are proposed. One of the mains learning of this thesis is about methods: a pathway is proposed for hybridization of methods of participatory epidemiology and a comprehensive socio-technical analysis based on the inputs of SAR and GERDAL methods
Colomes, Jérémie. "De la concertation à la co-construction, analyse des dispositifs de conception des politiques régionales d’économie sociale et solidaire." Thesis, Poitiers, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019POIT4002.
Full textThe cumulation of the SSE (2014) and NOTRe (2015) laws has significantly affected the production mechanism of public policies in the social solidarity economy (SSE). By creating a potentially co-constructed biennial EBS regional conference, the legislator has set up a space for expression around the design of public policies in the sector. By constraining the inclusion of the conclusions of this event in the design of the "ESS" part of the regional scheme of development of the economy, innovation and internationalization (SRDE2I), he reveals an interesting articulation between the two texts.The stakes of a co-construction – as such as a common, plural construction - of public policies are numerous. For the legislator, the goal is to answer to a lake of involvement from the citizens regarding politics. The problematic chosen by our statement is based on this approach, by investigating whether co-construction can involve the citizen better in the management of public affairs. Have local governments responded to the legislator's encouragement by co-constructing their conference? Has the SSE sector got mobilized? What does the legislator mean by co-construction? What was the interpretation of the Regions? For what result?Keywords: participative democracy; social and solidarity economy; democratic innovation; social innovation; regional policies
Salliou, Nicolas. "La gestion paysagère des ravageurs : exploration des verrous et leviers d'une innovation agroécologique par la modélisation participative." Thesis, Toulouse, INPT, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017INPT0040/document.
Full textAgroecology requires the design of farming system integrating as much as possible ecosystem services. Biological control by natural enemies may substitute commonly used pesticides. Ecology findings demonstrate that farming landscapes with a high proportion of natural habitats (woods, forests meadows, etc) favor natural enemies by providing them shelter, nesting sites and food. Landscape Pest Control (LPC), i.e. the design of farming landscapes in favor of these habitats, may be implemented to foster natural enemies and biological pest control. However, how stakeholders may design such landscapes remains unexplored. In this PhD, we followed an action-research approach and explored the design of such pest regulating landscapes together with local and scientific stakeholders. We initiated a participatory approach with agricultural stakeholders in a part of the Tarn-et-Garonne region specialized in fruit production. Our research seeks to identify the factors in favor of a LPC according to stakeholders’ representations and knowledge. In particular, we qualified the conditions under which natural enemies and the landscape are socially constructed resources providing ecosystem services. We also seek to identify if these stakeholders were linked through dependencies which may necessitate a coordinated management of the landscape. We explored the possibility of a LPC through several cycle of participatory modelling. This PhD successively established mental models of local stakeholders about their pest control strategies, co-constructed participatory Bayesian models in order to explore uncertainties surrounding LPC, and finally we co-constructed an agent-based model about the population dynamic of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii and its potential landscape management. Our results show that, according to scientific and local stakeholder’s actual representations, the composition of the landscape in natural habitats is weakly related with pest regulation ecosystem services, even though the landscape is related with higher functional biodiversity. Nowadays, as stakeholders see little benefit, they don’t consider to be dependent to benefit from an enhanced biological control through a LPC strategy. Farmers rather mention their preference towards individual solutions such as pesticides or exclusion nets surrounding their orchards. This individual focus suggests that designing innovation favorable to natural enemies might be more relevant within farms, like focusing on the vegetation between rows of fruit trees. Besides, these results show the need for scientific studies relating economics and ecology to explicitly measure the benefits farmers could obtain from a landscape favorable to natural enemies. Positive results of such study would enhance further participatory research around LPC strategies. Finally, this participatory and exploratory research identified new sites for investigation and raised questions about the LPC which could be further looked into
Steurer, Beate. "The city as a laboratory of democratic innovation: Negotiating legitimacy, technology and urban entrepreneurialism through participative online forums." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Teologiska institutionen, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-424282.
Full textKnibbe, Cédric. "Concevoir avec des technologies émergentes pour la construction conjointe des pratiques et des artefacts : apports d’une méthodologie participative à l’innovation technologique et pédagogique." Thesis, Paris, CNAM, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016CNAM1123/document.
Full textInformation and Communication Technologies have the potential for deeply transforming teachers’ practices. However, this requires design solutions to be adapted to these practices and, at the same time, to foster innovations, in terms of improvements for teaching and learning activities. This thesis aims at highlighting design factors that allow the articulation between these goals, in the context of a design project with emerging technologies for education. The research focuses onthe design process: joint definition of a technical system (an application on an interactive tabletop) and of teaching practices (via pedagogical scenarios); involvement of future users; design hypothesis assessment modalities; framing the scope of design possibilities. Our hypotheses concern the potential effects of these factors on the reaching of a compromise between integration and innovation related goals.Analyses cover the entire design process, in order to longitudinally examine the various design techniques used and the design process advancement. In particular, design choices related to some of the features of the artifact are analyzed to investigate the links between design factors and integration/innovation related goals.Results show that: (i) using and redefining pedagogical scenarios, involving users as co-designers, confronting the design solutions with prototypes and simulations and identifying users’ needs facilitate the technical definition of the application and its integration in future teaching activities; (ii) defining the technical properties of an artifact, involving teachers as experimenters, identifying their needs and simulating on the design solution foster the adaptation of teachers’ practices to the specificities of the technologies and optimize its integration ; (iii) allowing participants to interact with the emerging technology in different ways and the mutual learning processes between designers, regarding tabletops technical and interactional potential,help them capitalize on this potential ; (iv) identifying the innovative features of tabletops, anticipating their potential uses, testing prototypes in real class situations and involving teachers, to let them learn how to use an emerging technology and to express the existing limits of in their teaching practices, foster innovation in their pedagogical scenarios and, thus, can improve teaching and learning activities
Books on the topic "Innovation participative"
de, Peganow Nadège, ed. Innovation participative: Remettre l'humain au coeur de l'entreprise. Paris: Scrineo, 2012.
Find full textJane, Morris, and Local Government Management Board, eds. Innovations in public participation. London: Local Government Management Board., 1996.
Find full textCalvet, Laurent. Financial innovation, market participation and asset prices. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003.
Find full textDemocratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Find full textSherwood, Dennis. Innovation express. Oxford, U.K: Capstone Pub., 2002.
Find full text1964-, Gu Wulong, and Statistics Canada. Micro-Economic Analysis Division., eds. Trade liberalization: Export-market participation, productivity growth and innovation. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2004.
Find full textEuropean Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions., ed. Participation in technological change. Shankill, Co. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 1987.
Find full textPaul, Drewe, Klein Juan-Luis, and Hulsbergen Edward, eds. The challenge of social innovation in urban revitalization. Amsterdam: Techne Press, 2008.
Find full textRay, Markey, and Monat Jacques, eds. Innovation and employee participation through works councils: International case studies. Aldershot, Hants, England: Avebury, 1997.
Find full textEmployee-driven innovation: A new approach. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Innovation participative"
Levin, Morten. "Organizational Innovation Is a Participative Process." In A Companion to Organizational Anthropology, 275–88. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118325513.ch13.
Full textMarx, Susanne, and Lorena Arens. "Towards a Framework for Participative Innovation in Tourism." In Tourism, Travel, and Hospitality in a Smart and Sustainable World, 307–21. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26829-8_19.
Full textKartono, I. G. Pusparani, T. A. Wibowo, Yanah, and K. T. Hermawan. "Participative development in developing the creative economy in Cirebon City." In Acceleration of Digital Innovation & Technology towards Society 5.0, 301–10. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003222927-47.
Full textQvale, Thoralf Ulrik. "Participative Democracy and the Diffusion of Organizational Innovations: The Long, Winding Road from a Plant Level ‘Field Experiment’ to Regional Economic Development." In Learning Regional Innovation, 187–205. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230304154_10.
Full textGrácio, Helena, Miguel de Aboim Borges, and Cátia Rijo. "Building Interactions Through Participative Methodologies: Co-creation Between Crafts and Design in an Academic Context." In Springer Series in Design and Innovation, 829–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09659-4_56.
Full textDe Rosa, Annalinda, and Laura Galluzzo. "Aesthetics of Design for Social Innovation. Pathways for a Dialogue with Everyday Aesthetics." In Springer Series in Design and Innovation, 485–92. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49811-4_46.
Full textMazzanti, Anna. "Operazione Arcevia. Existential Community. The Reality of the Experience and the Utopia of the Vision." In Springer Series in Design and Innovation, 569–83. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49811-4_54.
Full textGaßner, Robert, and Karlheinz Steinmüller. "Scenarios that tell a Story. Normative Narrative Scenarios – An Efficient Tool for Participative Innovation-Oriented Foresight." In Envisioning Uncertain Futures, 37–48. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25074-4_3.
Full textBibri, Simon Elias. "Democratizing AmI and the IoT: The Power and Influence of Social Innovation and Participative and Humanistic Design." In Atlantis Ambient and Pervasive Intelligence, 239–301. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-142-0_8.
Full textObiols, Alba. "How Do We Approach and Involve Companies in Design Fields? Lessons Learned from Surveys and Participative Workshops." In Materialising the Future, 27–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25207-5_2.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Innovation participative"
Movahedian, Fatemeh, Agnes Front, Dominique Rieu, Armelle Farastier, Christelle Grandvallet, Franck Pourroy, and Guy Prudhomme. "A participative method for knowledge elicitation in collaborative innovation projects." In 2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/rcis.2017.7956543.
Full textNoennig, Jörg Rainer, Filipe Mello Rose, Paul Raphael Stadelhofer, and Anja Jannack. "Co-Creation in Urban Strategy Making : Variety in Participant Recruitment and Interaction Formats for the Dresden Smart City Model Project." In 14th European Conference on Creativity in Innovation. AIJR Publisher, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.154.18.
Full textMovahedian-Attar, Fatemeh. "A participative method to improve knowledge absorption capacity in collaborative innovation projects." In 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/rcis.2016.7549359.
Full textCoppola, Ilaria, Chiara Fiscone, Fabrizio Bracco, and Nadia Rania. "PARTICIPATIVE AND CONSCIOUS LEARNING: AN ACTIVE TEACHING EXPERIENCE WITH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS." In 16th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2023.1530.
Full textPoutanen, Marjo Anneli. "PROUDLY PRESENTING, FOR THE FIRST TIME IN FINLAND, MASTER'S DEGREE OF BEAUTY AND COSMETICS. DESIGNING THE CURRICULUM WITH PARTICIPATIVE PEDAGOGY." In 11th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2018.1678.
Full textde Andreis, Federico, and Federico Leopardi. "SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR." In Sixth International Scientific-Business Conference LIMEN Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research. Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31410/limen.2020.223.
Full textZheng, Qing, and Wei Guo. "Motivations for Users Participating in Co-Innovation Communities: A Case Study of Local Motors." In ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-97417.
Full textLuis, Serpa-Andrade, Rivera-Calle Fredy, and Pinos-Velez Eduardo. "The Participative Action of the Research Group of the Universidad Politecnica Salesiana as a Connection to the Vinculation with Society Throught the Educative Innovation." In 2018 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/edunine.2018.8450986.
Full textGabellone, Francesco, Ivan Ferrari, Francesco Giuri, and Maria Chiffi. "SELF-EXPLAINING VIDEOS FOR THE MUSEO EGIZIO IN TURIN." In ARQUEOLÓGICA 2.0 - 8th International Congress on Archaeology, Computer Graphics, Cultural Heritage and Innovation. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/arqueologica8.2016.3550.
Full textSuleeva, Diliara. "Diffuse Processes as a Factor of Success and Scale in the Development of Innovative Economy." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c10.02089.
Full textReports on the topic "Innovation participative"
Calvet, Laurent, Martin Gonzalez-Eiras, and Paolo Sodini. Financial Innovation, Market Participation and Asset Prices. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w9840.
Full textDuring, Roel, and Hans Dagevos. Wageningen social innovation approach : Een uitnodiging tot participatie. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/466716.
Full textCrespi, Gustavo, and Rafael Castillo. Supply-side versus Demand-side Innovation Policies in Peru: The Impacts of Public Procurement of Innovation. Inter-American Development Bank, January 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004683.
Full textCrespi, Gustavo, and Rafael Castillo. Supply-side versus Demand-side Innovation Policies: Exploring the Impacts of Public Procurement of Innovation in Peru. Inter-American Development Bank, July 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004348.
Full textMaussang, Kenneth, Hélène Jouguet, Thomas Jouneau, Jean-François Martin, and Nicolas Larousse. Recherches participatives, innovation ouverte et science ouverte Résultats de l'enquête nationale. Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.52949/33.
Full textTacsir, Ezequiel, and Mariano Pereira. Gender Contribution to the Innovation-Productivity Relationship in the Wake of COVID-19: Evidence for the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank, March 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004770.
Full textMaffioli, Alessandro, and Bronwyn H. Hall. Evaluating the Impact of Technology Development Funds in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Latin-America. Inter-American Development Bank, January 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0011145.
Full textMilesi, Cecilia. Innovation and citizens' participation in peacebuilding processes: necessary reconfigurations for conflict resolution. E-papers Servicos Editoriais Ltda, January 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.48207/23181818/pb0503.
Full textÁlvarez, Isabel, and Yury Castillo. Gender Diversity, Innovation, and Open Innovation in the Caribbean Region. Inter-American Development Bank, April 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004853.
Full textRohracher, Harald, ed. User-led innovations and participation processes: lessons from sustainable energy technologies. Vienna: self, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1553/ita-pa-mo-06-1.
Full text