Academic literature on the topic 'Innovation paradox'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Innovation paradox.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Innovation paradox"
Glavovic, Bruce. "Coastal Innovation Paradox." Sustainability 5, no. 3 (March 4, 2013): 912–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5030912.
Full textGiddens, Jean. "The Innovation Paradox." Journal of Professional Nursing 31, no. 4 (July 2015): 271–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.06.008.
Full textChan, Jeremy. "China's innovation paradox." Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 19, no. 1 (January 2, 2015): 23–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2014.992999.
Full textHofstra, Bas, Vivek V. Kulkarni, Sebastian Munoz-Najar Galvez, Bryan He, Dan Jurafsky, and Daniel A. McFarland. "The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 17 (April 14, 2020): 9284–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915378117.
Full textSabl, Andrew. "The paradox of innovation." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 182 (February 2021): 285–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.11.022.
Full textIto, Nobuiuki Costa, and Mihail De Pieri Mirica. "ADMINISTRAÇÃO DE P&D NA INDÚSTRIA DE ALTA TECNOLOGIA: COMO GERENCIAR UM PARADOXO? DOI:10.7444/fsrj.v2i2.60." Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies 2, no. 2 (December 7, 2010): 108–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.24023/futurejournal/2175-5825/2010.v2i2.60.
Full textMiyagiwa, Kaz, and Yunyun Wan. "Innovation and the merger paradox." Economics Letters 147 (October 2016): 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.08.005.
Full textEss, Charles Melvin. "Media innovations: success and paradox. (Editorial Introduction)." Journal of Media Innovations 2, no. 2 (August 12, 2015): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/jmi.v2i2.2371.
Full textRicketts, Thomas C., and Arnold D. Kaluzny. "Innovation within innovation: A paradox for cancer control research." Family & Community Health 12, no. 3 (November 1989): 54–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003727-198911000-00007.
Full textLi, Fei. "The Paradox of Reputation for Innovation." Academy of Management Proceedings 2020, no. 1 (August 2020): 18361. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.18361abstract.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Innovation paradox"
Lo, Amadou. "Le développement de l’ambidextrie contextuelle à l’aide d’un outil de gestion : étude de cas exploratoire du Fab Lab interne chez Renault." Thesis, Lyon 3, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015LYO30064/document.
Full textThis thesis aims to better understand and support corporate innovation strategies to help them coping with the challenges associated with the intensification of the dynamics and changes in the economic environment. However, in order to survive these economic rhythms, previous research recommends organizations to reconcile their exploitation and their exploration activities, concomitantly. In this context, our work specifically examines an innovation strategy giving particular attention to the initiatives of individuals in exploration activities : contextual ambidexterity. Simultaneously, our research examines an object of research previously unreleased in academic studies : the corporate Fab Lab (or internal Fab Lab). At the crossroads of these two subjects, this thesis raises the question of the development of contextual ambidexterity through a corporate Fab Lab. Our case study is conducted in Renault Group, one of the first structures to develop this practice of corporate Fab Lab. Our analysis permits to define this management tool as a quasi-structure conducive to the development of contextual ambidexterity. It then presents the guidance to lead in the objective of developing contextual ambidexterity through a corporate Fab Lab
Mace, Richard. "Business model innovation, business model enablers and the strategic agility paradox." Thesis, Capella University, 2017. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10254836.
Full textBusiness model innovation, business model enablers, and strategic agility are terms explicitly evaluated and explored by researchers and practitioners. The focus of this dissertation research project included the previous terms and the respective associations with business and leadership decision-making in the context of strategy and innovation. Research design and methodologies included a qualitative, embedded, single case-study through one-on-one, in-depth interviews with primary decision-makers from small technology companies in Minnesota, United States. Primary respondent qualifications were: (a) minimum of five years of experience, (b) minimum of five subordinates, and (c) decision power to influence business model innovation, business model enablers, or strategic agility. Three research questions guided the project: (1) How do the pillars of strategic agility (strategic sensitivity, leadership unity, and resource fluidity) affect business model innovations? (2) How can managers apply the pillars of strategic agility to enhance organizational strategic agility? and (3) How do senior leadership teams manage the contradictions and paradoxes within strategic agility? Respondent interviews were imported and analyzed through Nvivo qualitative data analytics software (QDAS). Over 50 findings are narrated in Chapter 4, of which included one of the key findings: Every company was actively engaged in the paradox, but none of the company leaders specifically calculated or processed the exact phrase – strategic agility paradox. Proposed in Chapter 5 are the set of recommendations for future researchers. The recommendations advocate research in or on contrasting industries and geographies, respondents with contrasting profiles, supplementary qualitative and quantitative techniques, alternative strategic agility pillars, and new research questions.
Strandell, Dalius Sofia, and Titti Broman. "Exploring a Paradox Management Approach to Achieve Ambidexterity : Empirically Testing the Relevance and Applicability of the Paradox Map on Commercial Real Estate Owners." Thesis, KTH, Fastigheter och byggande, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-298300.
Full textKARLSSON, MICHELLE, and CHARLOTTE VESTERLUND. "Managing the Innovation Paradox of Exploitation andExploration in R&D : Is measurement of innovation the key to promoteexploration?" Thesis, KTH, Industriell Management, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-238441.
Full textAtt balansera innovationsparadoxen syftar till den organisatoriska förmågan att tillägna tillräckliga resurser för exekvering för att säkerställa kortsiktig vinst, och samtidigt, tillägna tillräckliga resurser till utforskande för att säkra ett strategiskt framtida läge. Tidigare forskning visar att organisationers långsiktiga överlevnad är beroende av dessa avvägningar, att leverera produkter med högt kundvärde är viktigt för dagens affär men får inte göras på bekostnad av att utforska möjligheter som kan resultera i framtida innovationer. Att strategiskt balansera dessa två perspektiv utgör en stor utmaning för alla organisationer eftersom att exekvering och utforskande aktiviteter kräver helt olika förutsättningar när det kommer till strukturer, processer och strategier. Företag som besitter förmågan att balansera dessa två helt olika perspektiv brukar refereras som tvehänta. Tvehänta organisationer har visat sig balansera dessa två perspektiv på olika sätt, vilka alla medför utmaningar, dock av olika slag. Tidigare forskning har betonat ledarskap och chefskap som viktiga faktorer i skapandet av tvehänta organisationer men har på grund av organisatoriska differentieringar och olikheter resulterat i vaga riktlinjer angående hur man praktiskt löser de utmaningar som uppstår mellan exekverande och utforskande aktiviteter. Scania, initiativtagare till detta arbete är ett av världens ledande tillverkare inom lastbil och buss för tunga transporter. Scania känner osäkerhet i vad som brukade vara en således stabil bransch. Ständiga förbättringar har varit en betydelsefull strategi i decennier för forskning och utveckling, FoU, men inför ett eventuellt teknikskifte inser man att en betydligt större del av arbetet måste syfta till utforskande aktiviteter. Syftet med detta examensarbete är att undersöka hur management kan möjliggöra och främja utforskande aktiviteter i en mogen FoU-avdelning. Den utförda forskningen grundar sig i en kvalitativ fallstudie som är avgränsad till en specifik FoUavdelning, chassiutveckling för lastbil. För att få en djupare förståelse för ledarskap och det ledarskapsansvar som finns i att främja och stödja utforskande aktiviteter kräver vissa organisatoriska förutsättningar har ett flertal avdelningar inom FoU-organisationen samt sälj & marknad inkluderats i studien. Den utförda forskningen visar att chefer på den undersökta avdelningen möter av ett flertal utmaningar när de försöker möjliggöra och främja utforskande aktiviteter. Det grundar sig främst i ett högt focus på leveransprecision som begränsar chefer i sin roll att stödja och främja utforskande aktiviteter, följden av detta resulterar i begränsat med tid för utforskande eftersom dessa aktiviteter inte prioriteras. Nuvarande prestationsmätning visar indikationer på att ytterligare bidra till dessa utmaningar eftersom de avser att mäta till den största grad, leveransprecision, kvalité och kostnad och där utforskande aktiviteter saknar prestationsmätning. Resultatet av denna studie bidrar med praktiska implikationer för den studerade avdelningen. Eftersom att uppmärksamhet är den mest begränsade resursen har mätvärden för utforskande aktiviteter föreslagits då mätning och styrning av utforskande aktiviteter kan bidra till att dessa aktiviteter uppmärksammas samtidigt som de kan utgöra ett stöd för sektionscheferna i deras roll att främja och stödja utforskande aktiviteter.
Gomez, Yannick. "Le rôle et les motivations d’une firme leader dans l’essai de transformation de son écosystème d’affaires en écosystème de l’innovation : le cas du site de Marcoule et du démantèlement nucléaire." Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3037.
Full textThe American James MOORE was the first to discuss the concept of business ecosystem in an article from 1993 and in a book published in 1996. Several theoretical questions seemingly need to be completed:- The place and role of a leading firm within a business ecosystem - The question of the life cycle of a business - The emergence of the term "ecosystem of innovation" and its positioning in relation to the concept of business ecosystem.In order to study those different research questions, we have observed for a long time the evolution of the nuclear platform of Marcoule. In 2013, the CEA Marcoule launched the Industrial Sites Valorisation Pole initiative, which aims to promote the upgrading of the ecosystem. The objective of the leading firm is therefore to transform its business ecosystem into an ecosystem of innovation. In the first part of the case study, we studied the motivations of the leading firm for transforming its business ecosystem into an innovation ecosystem.Nuclear dismantling leads to seven major paradoxes (human, contractual, waste, safety, financial, territorial, technological). The case of Marcoule demonstrates that if the paradoxes are major, the company may not find, internally, by its own forces, the means to respond. Some paradoxes impose innovations of exploration on the conceptual, managerial and technological levels. The second part of the case study was devoted to the study of the role of the CEA Marcoule, leader of the territorial business ecosystem in order to transform it. Then we observed and described three concrete enrolment actions of the actors,- The translation on the market of the ecosystem upgrading- The creation of a frontier object around ecosystem labelling- The opening of the innovation This phase of observation of the enrolment actions initiated by the leader of the ecosystem took place during the period from 2013 to mid 2017. We were able to observe the promising start of the PVIS initiative and the successful enrolment of the actors around the first projects that were launched. The observation of the Marcoule research field through the prism of our conceptual framework, the sociology of translation, makes it possible to highlight two important results.First, the study of the Marcoule case allows us to complete the theoretical approach on the life cycle of a business ecosystem, in particular on the notion of intentionality. Phase changes - from birth to expansion, from expansion to authority and from authority to decline - do not result from the foreseeable actions of actors determined by biology, but are the result of the strategic intentions of intelligent actors who continually calculate the gains and losses they can derive from their participation in the business ecosystem.We suggest replacing the traditional life cycle of a business ecosystem proposed by James MOORE (Birth Expansion Authority Renewal Decline and Death) by the following sequence (Birth Expansion Transformation in ecosystem of innovation Decline and Death).Secondly, the observation of the Marcoule case and the leading firm of its territorial business ecosystem completes the academic work that exists on the articulation of different forms of ambidexterity. The CEA/Marcoule case shows us that all the implemented ambidextrous actions were legitimised by highlighting the problems needing to be solved, linked to the paradoxes of nuclear dismantling. purchasing needs to achieve a competition respecting all the rules of the public procurement
Ingram, Amy E. "Innovation and the Family Firm: Leadership, Mindsets, Practices and Tensions." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1305030185.
Full textKarlsson, Michélle, and Charlotte Vesterlund. "Managing the Innovation Paradox of Exploitation and Exploration in R&D - : Is measurement of innovation the key to promote exploration?" Thesis, KTH, Industriell ekonomi och organisation (Inst.), 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-246078.
Full textAtt balansera innovationsparadoxen syftar till den organisatoriska förmågan att tillägna tillräckliga resurser för exekvering för att säkerställa kortsiktig vinst, och samtidigt, tillägna tillräckliga resurser till utforskande för att säkra ett strategiskt framtida läge. Tidigare forskning visar att organisationers långsiktiga överlevnad är beroende av dessa avvägningar, att leverera produkter med högt kundvärde är viktigt för dagens affär men får inte göras på bekostnad av att utforska möjligheter som kan resultera i framtida innovationer. Att strategiskt balansera dessa två perspektiv utgör en stor utmaning för alla organisationer eftersom att exekvering och utforskande aktiviteter kräver helt olika förutsättningar när det kommer till strukturer, processer och strategier. Företag som besitter förmågan att balansera dessa två helt olika perspektiv brukar refereras som tvehänta. Tvehänta organisationer har visat sig balansera dessa två perspektiv på olika sätt, vilka alla medför utmaningar, dock av olika slag. Tidigare forskning har betonat ledarskap och chefskap som viktiga faktorer i skapandet av tvehänta organisationer men har på grund av organisatoriska differentieringar och olikheter resulterat i vaga riktlinjer angående hur man praktiskt löser de utmaningar som uppstår mellan exekverande och utforskande aktiviteter. Scania, initiativtagare till detta arbete är ett av världens ledande tillverkare inom lastbil och buss för tunga transporter. Scania känner osäkerhet i vad som brukade vara en således stabil bransch. Ständiga förbättringar har varit en betydelsefull strategi i decennier för forskning och utveckling, FoU, men inför ett eventuellt teknikskifte inser man att en betydligt större del av arbetet måste syfta till utforskande aktiviteter. Syftet med detta examensarbete är att undersöka hur management kan möjliggöra och främja utforskande aktiviteter i en mogen FoU-avdelning. Den utförda forskningen grundar sig i en kvalitativ fallstudie som är avgränsad till en specifik FoU-avdelning, chassiutveckling för lastbil. För att få en djupare förståelse för ledarskap och det ledarskapsansvar som finns i att främja och stödja utforskande aktiviteter kräver vissa organisatoriska förutsättningar har ett flertal avdelningar inom FoU-organisationen samt sälj & marknad inkluderats i studien. Den utförda forskningen visar att chefer på den undersökta avdelningen möter av ett flertal utmaningar när de försöker möjliggöra och främja utforskande aktiviteter. Det grundar sig främst i ett högt focus på leveransprecision som begränsar chefer i sin roll att stödja och främja utforskande aktiviteter, följden av detta resulterar i begränsat med tid för utforskande eftersom dessa aktiviteter inte prioriteras. Nuvarande prestationsmätning visar indikationer på att ytterligare bidra till dessa utmaningar eftersom de avser att mäta till den största grad, leveransprecision, kvalité och kostnad och där utforskande aktiviteter saknar prestationsmätning. Resultatet av denna studie bidrar med praktiska implikationer för den studerade avdelningen. Eftersom att uppmärksamhet är den mest begränsade resursen har mätvärden för utforskande aktiviteter föreslagits då mätning och styrning av utforskande aktiviteter kan bidra till att dessa aktiviteter uppmärksammas samtidigt som de kan utgöra ett stöd för sektionscheferna i deras roll att främja och stödja utforskande aktiviteter.
Eaton, Benjamin David. "The dynamics of digital platform innovation : unfolding the paradox of control and generativity in Apple's iOS." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2012. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/463/.
Full textXoljé, Rebecca. "Innovation inom outsourcing av IT : En kvalitativ studie utifrån leverantörens möjligheter att bidra." Thesis, Karlstads universitet, Handelshögskolan, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-47833.
Full textJohansson, Adam, and Victor Sundell. "Konsten att förena en paradox : En kvalitativ studie om hur relationer mellan stabilitet och förändring ter sig inom en organisation." Thesis, Södertörns högskola, Företagsekonomi, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-35469.
Full textBackground: Organizations and companies face several challenges regarding adaptation to the rapid development that is taking place in today's society. It is vital for companies that are in fast-changing industries to act quickly and efficiently to stay at the forefront of their specific area. Purpose: This study intends to form an understanding of how the relationship between stability and change occurs in an innovative company, which work within a rapidly changing environment. Furthermore, the study intends to contribute deeper insights into the balance between organizational stability and short-term innovation processes as well as employees' views on this balance. Method: The study has embraced a qualitative approach where empirical gathering was conducted through twelve interviews with employees at different levels within the investigated organization. Conclusion: The study shows that the surveyed organization maintains stability through work based on routines, experiences and habits. Differences can be found in how employees perceive the relationship between stability and change, with different perspectives at management level and employee level.
Books on the topic "Innovation paradox"
Haour, Georges. Resolving the Innovation Paradox. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555.
Full textResolving the innovation paradox: Enhancing growth in technology companies. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Find full textMaddock, G. Michael. Brand new: Solving the innovation paradox--how great brands invent and launch new products, services, and business models. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2011.
Find full textParadox and imperatives in health care: Redirecting reform for efficiency and effectiveness. Boca Raton: CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.
Find full textBauer, Jeffrey C. Paradox and imperatives in health care: How efficiency, effectiveness, and e-transformation can conquer waste and optimize quality. New York: Productivity Press, 2008.
Find full textMark, Hagland, ed. Paradox and imperatives in health care: How efficiency, effectiveness, and e-transformation can conquer waste and optimize quality. New York: Productivity Press, 2008.
Find full textBauer, Jeffrey C. Paradox and imperatives in health care: How efficiency, effectiveness, and e-transformation can conquer waste and optimize quality. New York: Productivity Press, 2008.
Find full textEymery, Gérard. Le paradoxe des télécoms, constats et analyse. Paris: Publisud, 2003.
Find full textEymery, Gérard. Le paradoxe des télécoms: Constat et analyse. Paris: Publisud, 2003.
Find full textGetting unstuck: Using Leadership Paradox to execute with confidence. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Innovation paradox"
Haour, Georges. "Redefining Innovation Management: the Distributed Innovation System." In Resolving the Innovation Paradox, 67–88. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_5.
Full textHaour, Georges. "Innovation is Survival." In Resolving the Innovation Paradox, 1–13. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_1.
Full textHaour, Georges. "Is Innovation Manageable?" In Resolving the Innovation Paradox, 31–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_3.
Full textStehr, Nico. "The Productivity Paradox." In Information, Innovation and Impacts, 255–71. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4617-7_12.
Full textLennox, Peter. "Paradox, Technology and Creativity." In Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation, 1–6. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_63-1.
Full textHaour, Georges. "The CEO as Innovation Champion." In Resolving the Innovation Paradox, 15–29. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_2.
Full textHaour, Georges. "Leveraging Technical Innovation through a Diversity of Channels." In Resolving the Innovation Paradox, 53–66. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_4.
Full textHaour, Georges. "Energizing the Distributed Innovation System with Entrepreneurship." In Resolving the Innovation Paradox, 89–108. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_6.
Full textHaour, Georges. "The Crucial Human Factor." In Resolving the Innovation Paradox, 109–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_7.
Full textHaour, Georges. "Conclusion: Creating Value and Growth through Distributed Innovation." In Resolving the Innovation Paradox, 127–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_8.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Innovation paradox"
Yong, Mengchen Sam, Lavinia Paganini, Huilian Sophie Qiu, and Jose Bayoan Santiago Calderon. "The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Open-Source Software." In 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/msr52588.2021.00089.
Full textDafnis, Bill. "The Innovation Diffusion Paradox in Undergraduate Information Technology Student Outcomes." In SIGITE/RIIT '15: The 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education and the 4th Annual Conference on Research in Information Technology. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2808006.2808036.
Full textUtterberg, Marie, Martin Tallvid, and Johan Lundin. "THE PARADOX OF DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION - A DESIGN TRADE OFF." In 10th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2017.0424.
Full textFischer, Boogaard, and Huysman. "Innovation and creativity versus control assessing the paradox in IT organizations." In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.1994.323478.
Full textDorodchi, Mohsen, and Nasrin Dehbozorgi. "Addressing the Paradox of Fun and Rigor in Learning Programming." In ITiCSE '17: Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3073004.
Full textManulangga, Gloria Christiana, Christa Elena Blandina Bire, and Daniel Silli Bataona. "Expert System of The Criminal Code using Forward Chaining and RDBMS Paradox." In 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icitsi.2018.8696060.
Full textHossain, Azmal. "054: IUD USE IN BANGLADESH: THE PARADOX OF NEED, DEMAND AND SUPPLY CONTINUUM." In Global Forum on Research and Innovation for Health 2015. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-forum2015abstracts.54.
Full textKong, Feng, and Bin Li. "An Analysis of the Paradox of Constant Increasing Activity in Logistics Network Planning." In 2017 International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (MSMI 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/msmi-17.2017.19.
Full textLu, Qiang, Shuang Chen, Zhuoxin Li, and Hong Yin. "Applying the Concept of Paradox to a Trade-off Puzzle Framework and Case Study." In 2008 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII). IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iciii.2008.242.
Full textMavridis, Anestis, Lazaros Tzimkas, and Diogenis Ztoupas. "DO WE TEACH OUR STUDENTS HOW TO SEARCH OVER THE INTERNET? A PARADOX OF THE GREEK EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM." In 10th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2017.1880.
Full text