Academic literature on the topic 'Individual treatment'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Individual treatment.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Individual treatment"
Koehler, Andreas, Jana Eyssel, and Timo O. Nieder. "Genders and Individual Treatment Progress in (Non-)Binary Trans Individuals." Journal of Sexual Medicine 15, no. 1 (January 2018): 102–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.11.007.
Full textSchneider, M., T. Welsch, M. Kremer, and M. W. Büchler. "Endemic goiter—individual risk factors necessitate individual treatment." Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 396, no. 8 (October 18, 2011): 1125–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0856-x.
Full textPolk, Hiram C. "Individual treatment for malignant melanoma." Journal of Surgical Oncology 40, no. 1 (January 1989): 46–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930400111.
Full textFLACK, J. "Individual treatment approaches in hypertension." American Journal of Hypertension 8, no. 4 (April 1995): 4A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-7061(95)97387-7.
Full textFeng, Qian, Quang Vuong, and Haiqing Xu. "Estimation of Heterogeneous Individual Treatment Effects With Endogenous Treatments." Journal of the American Statistical Association 115, no. 529 (April 11, 2019): 231–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2018.1543121.
Full textMorelli, Mario. "Race-Conscious Admissions and Individual Treatment." Social Philosophy Today 12 (1996): 133–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/socphiltoday19961213.
Full textAndo, Shigeru. "Promotion of Installing Individual Treatment Facility." Japan journal of water pollution research 14, no. 4 (1991): 213–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2965/jswe1978.14.213.
Full textHeerspink, Hiddo J. L. "Predicting individual treatment response in diabetes." Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 7, no. 6 (June 2019): 415–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30118-4.
Full textPoulson, Robert S., Gary L. Gadbury, and David B. Allison. "Treatment Heterogeneity and Individual Qualitative Interaction." American Statistician 66, no. 1 (February 2012): 16–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.671724.
Full textBeck, Robert L. "The individual interview in couples treatment." Journal of Family Therapy 11, no. 3 (1989): 231–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j..1989.00349.x.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Individual treatment"
Poulson, Robert S. "Treatment heterogeneity and individual qualitative interaction." Diss., Kansas State University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/8568.
Full textDepartment of Statistics
Gary L. Gadbury
The potential for high variability in treatment effects across individuals has been recognized as an important consideration in clinical studies. Surprisingly, little attention has been given to evaluating this variability in design of clinical trials or analyses of resulting data. High variation in a treatment’s efficacy or safety across individuals (referred to herein as treatment heterogeneity) may have important consequences because the optimal treatment choice for an individual may be different from that suggested by a study of average effects. We call this an individual qualitative interaction (IQI), borrowing terminology from earlier work - referring to a qualitative interaction (QI) being present when the optimal treatment varies across ‘groups’ of individuals. At least three techniques have been proposed to investigate treatment heterogeneity: techniques to detect a QI, use of measures such as the density overlap of two outcome variables under different treatments, and use of cross-over designs to observe ‘individual effects.’ Connections, limitations, and the required assumptions are compared among these techniques through a quantity frequently referred to as subject-treatment (S-T) interaction, but shown here to be the probability of an IQI (PIQI). Their association is studied utilizing a potential outcomes framework that can add insights to results from usual data analyses and to study design features to more directly assess treatment heterogeneity. Particular attention is given to the density overlap of two outcome variables, each representing an individual’s ‘potential’ response under a different treatment. Connections are made between the overlap quantified as the proportion of similar responses (PSR) and the PIQI. Given a bivariate normal model, the maximum PIQI is shown to be an upper bound for ½ the PSR. Additionally, the characterization of a conditional PSR allows for the PIQI boundaries to be developed within subgroups defined over observable covariates so that the subset contribution to treatment heterogeneity may be identified. The possibility of similar boundaries is explored outside the normal model using the skew normal distribution. Furthermore, a bivariate PIQI is developed along with its PSR counterpart to help characterize treatment heterogeneity resulting from a bivariate response such as the efficacy and safety of a treatment.
Johnson, Patrick R. "The cognitive behavioral treatment of chronic headache : group versus individual treatment format /." The Ohio State University, 1985. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1487260531956491.
Full textFick, Sarah Johanna. "Consenting to objectifying treatment? Human dignity and individual freedom." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/20286.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine whether an individual can and/or should be allowed to consent to objectifying treatment. This necessitated the determination of the meaning of dignity, the meaning of freedom and the relationship between dignity and freedom. It was found that both the right not to be objectified and the right to consent to objectification could be found within human dignity. This is due to the broad definition of dignity in terms of which dignity has two, sometimes contradicting, components. One component safeguards autonomy and the right to choose, which supports consent to objectification, whereas the other promotes individual self-worth by prohibiting objectifying treatment. By investigating the meaning of freedom it was found that freedom as a constitutional value, and possibly also a free-standing constitutional right, could incorporate the right to consent to objectifying treatment. Three possible solutions to this tension between human dignity and freedom were identified and critically analysed. The first was that an individual cannot and should not be allowed to consent to objectification. This solution is primarily based on the notion that dignity is supreme to freedom and that freedom should yield to communitarian dignity. Furthermore, it is contended that consent to objectification is often invalid due to economic coercion and undue influence. The second possible solution was that, although an individual might not be able to validly consent to objectifying treatment, such consent should still be allowed under certain circumstances. The example of invalid consent due to economic coercion introduced in the previous solution was examined in relation to prostitution. The contention regarding this approach is that, since our government is unable to fulfil the socio-economic needs of those who consent due to economic coercion, such consent should be allowed and strictly regulated. The third possible approach was that circumstances do exist in which individuals can give valid consent to objectification and that in these circumstances they should be allowed to do so. In this solution the grounds of the first approach is criticised by contending, for example, that dignity is not supreme to freedom, that a plural society should allow these type of choices and that consent to objectification is already allowed in some instances. The results of this study were that, although there are situations in which genuine consent is not possible, it can be given under certain circumstances. An individual who cannot give genuine consent to objectification should not be allowed to do so, unless transitional measures dictate otherwise. However, an individual who is capable of giving valid consent to objectification should be allowed to do so. Finally, regardless of whether such consent is genuine or not, strict regulation thereof is required.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die doel van hierdie studie was om vas te stel of 'n individu kan toestem en/of toegelaat behoort te word om toe te stem tot objektiverende behandeling. Dit genoodsaak dat die betekenis van menswaardigheid en vryheid, asook verhouding tussen hierdie twee begrippe vasgestel word. Daar is bevind dat beide die reg om nie te geobjektifeer te word nie en die reg om toe te stem tot objektivering gevind kan word binne die begrip van menswaardigheid. Hierdie is te danke aan die breë definisie van menswaardigheid in terme waarvan menswaardigheid uit twee, soms weersprekende, komponente bestaan. Een komponent beskerm outonomie en die reg om te kies, wat toestemming tot objektivering ondersteun, terwyl die ander komponent individuele waarde bevorder deurdat dit objektiverende behandeling verbied. Tydens die ondersoek aangaande die betekenis van vryheid is bevind dat vryheid as 'n grondwetlike waarde, en moontlik ook 'n vrystaande grondwetlike reg, die reg om toe te stem tot objektiverende behandeling kan inkorporeer. Drie moontlike oplossings vir hierdie spanning tussen menswaardigheid en vryheid is geïdentifiseer en krities ontleed. Die eerste is dat 'n individu nie kan toestem en ook nie toegelaat behoort te word om toe te stem tot objektivering nie. Hierdie oplossing is hoofsaaklik gebaseer op die veronderstelling dat vryheid onderworpe is aan menswaardigheid en dat individuele vryheid moet toegee tot die menswaardigheid van die gemeenskap. Verder word dit beweer dat toestemming tot objektivering dikwels ongeldig is as gevolg van die ekonomiese dwang en onbehoorlike beïnvloeding. Die tweede moontlike oplossing was dat, alhoewel 'n individu nie noodwendig instaat is om geldige toestemming tot objektiverende behandeling te verskaf nie, sodanige toestemming onder sekere omstandighede steeds toegelaat behoort te word. Die voorbeeld van ongeldig toestemming as gevolg van ekonomiese dwang wat in die vorige oplossing bekendgestel is, is ondersoek aan die hand van prostitusie. Die bewering ingevolge hierdie benadering is dat, aangesien ons regering is nie in staat is om die sosio-ekonomiese behoeftes van diegene wat toestem tot objektivering as gevolg van ekonomiese dwang te vervul nie, sodanige toestemming toegelaat en streng gereguleer behoort te word. Die derde moontlike benadering is dat daar wel omstandighede bestaan waar individue geldige toestemming kan gee tot objektivering en dat hulle in hierdie omstandighede toegelaat behoort te word om dit te gee. In terme van hierdie oplossing word die gronde waarop die eerste benadering gebaseer is gekritiseer, deur byvoorbeeld te argumenteer dat menswaardigheid nie verhewe is bo vryheid nie, dat in ons huidige diverse samelewing sulke soort keuses aanvaar behoort te word en dat toestemming tot objektivering reeds in sommige geval toegelaat word. Die resultate van hierdie studie was dat, alhoewel daar omstandighede bestaan waaronder geldige toestemming nie moontlik is nie, dit wel onder sekere omstandighede gegee kan word. 'n Individu wat nie daartoe instaat is om geldige toestemming tot objektivering te gee nie, behoort nie toegelaat word om dit te doen nie, tensy oorgangsmaatreëls anders bepaal. Waar 'n individu egter in staat is om geldige toestemming tot die objektivering te gee, behoort dit toegelaat word. Ten slotte is streng regulering van toestemming tot objektiverende behandeling nodig ongeag of sodanige toestemming geldig is of nie.
Wong, Hoi-wa Rachel. "Treatment of word reading in a Cantonese dyslexic individual." Click to view the E-thesis via HKU Scholars Hub, 2003. http://lookup.lib.hku.hk/lookup/bib/B38890811.
Full text"A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Science (Speech and Hearing Sciences), The University of Hong Kong, April 30, 2003." Includes bibliographical references (p. 29-30) Also available in print.
Ndum, Edwin Andong. "Individual treatment effect heterogeneity in multiple time points trials." Diss., Manhattan, Kan. : Kansas State University, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/1602.
Full textWang, Juan. "Estimation of individual treatment effect via Gaussian mixture model." HKBU Institutional Repository, 2020. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_oa/839.
Full textAlldredge, Cameron Todd. "Treatment Failure Rates in Group Versus Individual Treatment Using the OQ-45: An Archival Replication." BYU ScholarsArchive, 2019. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7471.
Full textTaylor, Liana. "General Responsivity and Evidence-Based Treatment: Individual and Program Predictors of Treatment Outcomes during Adolescent Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment." Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2014. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/308423.
Full textPh.D.
Since it was first articulated, the Risk-Need-Responsivity model (RNR; Andrews, Bonta, & Hoge, 1990) has been extensively researched and is regarded as an empirically supported model for providing effective correctional treatment. It is comprised of three core principles: the risk principle, which provides direction for who should receive treatment; the need principle, which identifies intermediate treatment targets; and the responsivity principle, which states how treatment programs should be structured. The RNR model is purported to be relevant for all offender populations, including female offenders (Dowden & Andrews, 1999a), juvenile offenders (Dowden & Andrews, 1999b), violent offenders (Dowden & Andrews, 2000), and sexual offenders (Hanson, Bourgon, Helmus, & Hogdson, 2009). Yet, the majority of RNR research has examined the risk and need principles, and the responsivity principle remains understudied. The responsivity principle includes two sub-principles: general and specific (Andrews, & Bonta, 2010). The current research explored the general responsivity principle, which states that programs should use theoretically relevant models for individual change, specifically cognitive-behavioral and cognitive-social learning models (Andrews & Bonta, 2010). The following techniques are consistent with these models: "role-playing, modeling, repeated practice of alternative behaviors, cognitive restructuring to modify thoughts/emotions, skills building, or reinforcement" (Andrews & Bonta, 2010, p. 50). Despite empirical support, the RNR model has received minimal application to juveniles, and it has not been widely tested in the substance abuse treatment context. Additionally, it is not clear whether adherence to the RNR model is relevant for reducing substance use outcomes in youth. Adolescent substance abuse treatment programs were designed to address substance use among juveniles, and have been widely researched to determine their effectiveness; yet their effectiveness remains understudied among juvenile offenders. These studies include examinations of specific treatment interventions used, such as Multisystemic Therapy. Many of these interventions are considered to be "evidence-based treatment" (EBT), but there is a wide variety of repositories that classify interventions as "evidence-based" with varying criteria used to classify them. The juvenile drug treatment court model (JDTC) was specifically developed to address substance use and crime among juvenile offenders; however, findings from empirical studies have not demonstrated a strong treatment effect. To address these gaps in the literature, secondary analyses were conducted on data collected from 132 adolescent outpatient substance abuse treatment programs (AOPs) and 10 juvenile drug treatment courts nationwide. This research was an application of the general responsivity principle in the AOP and JDTC context to determine the impact of responsivity adherence on the odds of rearrest and substance use severity. The analyses also included an examination of evidence-based treatment (EBT) in both samples to determine the influence of EBT use scores on the odds of rearrests and substance use severity scores. To examine the AOP sample, multilevel models were used to examine the individual- and program-level impact of responsivity adherence and EBT use. To examine the JDTC sample, multivariate analyses were used to examine the individual-level impact of responsivity adherence and EBT use. Overall, responsivity adherence was not significantly associated with rearrests among AOP participants, nor was it significantly associated with substance use severity scores. Additionally, the odds of rearrest were significantly greater among individuals who received interventions with a higher EBT use score; though, there was no association between the average EBT use scores across programs and the odds of rearrest. There was no significant association between individual- and program-level EBT use scores and substance use severity. Among JDTC participants, an increase in responsivity adherence was associated with an increase in the odds of rearrest and substance use severity. A similar association emerged between EBT use scores and both outcomes, wherein increases in EBT use scores were significantly associated with an increase in the odds of rearrest and substance use severity. The results of the analyses suggest the need for further specification of both general responsivity adherence and "evidence-based" treatment for use in future research and theory; specifically, further elaboration of the general responsivity-adherent techniques and clear criteria for classifying interventions as "evidence-based treatment." The findings also imply that certain types of treatment interventions are more compatible with the JDTC model than other interventions. Additional analyses suggest the possibility that general responsivity adherence and evidence-based treatment may not be unique constructs. Future research may benefit through exploring evidence-based treatment as a criterion for adherence to the general responsivity principle.
Temple University--Theses
Labermaier, Christiana. "Identification of novel candidate genes involved in individual antidepressant treatment response." Diss., Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 2015. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-179575.
Full textDonegan, Sarah. "The value of individual patient data for mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis." Thesis, University of Liverpool, 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.570446.
Full textBooks on the topic "Individual treatment"
Customized cancer treatment. Lemont, PA: Equinox Press, 2010.
Find full textDavis, Donald I. Alcoholism treatment: An integrative family and individual approach. New York: Gardner, 1987.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures. Treatment of investment expenses under the individual alternative minimum tax. [Washington, D.C: Joint Committee on Taxation, 1989.
Find full textCounseling problem gamblers: A self-regulation manual for individual and family therapy. San Diego: Academic Press, 2002.
Find full textMasterson, Karen A. Total health: Designed for the HIV challenged individual for attaining optimum health. San Diego, Calif: Westerfield Enterprises, 1991.
Find full textWeiss, Amy L. Perspectives on individual differences affecting therapeutic change in communication disorders. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.
Find full textWeiss, Amy L. Perspectives on individual differences affecting therapeutic change in communication disorders. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.
Find full textScott, Mike. An evaluation of individual and group cognitive therapy in the treatment of depression. Liverpool: Liverpool Personal Service Society, 1986.
Find full textPalazzoli, Mara Selvini. Self-starvation: From individual to family therapy in the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Northvale, N.J: J. Aronson, 1996.
Find full textPotter-Efron, Ronald T. Handbook of anger management: Individual, couple, family, and group approaches. New York: Haworth Press, 2004.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Individual treatment"
Shechtman, Zipora. "Individual Treatment." In The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality, 1–21. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09745-9_6.
Full textSpringer, David W., C. Aaron McNeece, and Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold. "Individual treatment." In Substance abuse treatment for criminal offenders: An evidence-based guide for practitioners., 41–68. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10569-003.
Full textTaft, Casey T., Christopher M. Murphy, and Suzannah K. Creech. "Individual interventions." In Trauma-informed treatment and prevention of intimate partner violence., 149–56. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14918-012.
Full textRazza, Nancy J., and Daniel J. Tomasulo. "Individual Treatment: Techniques and Rationale." In Healing trauma: The power of group treatment for people with intellectual disabilities., 151–70. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10846-008.
Full textMeneghini, Fabio. "Individual Treatment Plan for Rhinoplasty." In Basic Open Rhinoplasty, 163–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61827-8_10.
Full textFaller, Kathleen Coulborn. "An Overview of Treatment and Individual Treatment Issues." In Child Sexual Abuse, 321–42. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11047-6_12.
Full textFonagy, Peter. "Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)." In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 2855–59. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_912.
Full textFonagy, Peter. "Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)." In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 1–4. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_912-1.
Full textMonahan, Richard T. "Individual and Group Psychotherapy." In Residential and Inpatient Treatment of Children and Adolescents, 191–205. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0927-5_10.
Full textCleek, John B., and Eric C. Westman. "Surgical Treatment of the Obese Individual." In Obesity, 181–94. Second edition. | Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis, 2016. |: CRC Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b19716-10.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Individual treatment"
Shimane, R., S. Kumagai, M. Hori, and M. Sasaki. "Localized Plasma Treatment for Individual Cells." In 2013 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials. The Japan Society of Applied Physics, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.7567/ssdm.2013.g-2-6.
Full textJackson, David, Robert G. Price, Steven W. Yancey, Roland Buhl, and Sally Wenzel. "Characterising individual response to mepolizumab treatment." In ERS International Congress 2020 abstracts. European Respiratory Society, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2259.
Full textLiu, Ruoqi, Changchang Yin, and Ping Zhang. "Estimating Individual Treatment Effects with Time-Varying Confounders." In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdm50108.2020.00047.
Full textPuha, Zoltan, Maurits Kaptein, and Aurelie Lemmens. "Batch Mode Active Learning for Individual Treatment Effect Estimation." In 2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdmw51313.2020.00123.
Full textThomas Boving, Joshua Klement, Bethany Thienel, and Beverly Johnson. "Runoff Treatment with Aspen Wood." In Eleventh Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems Conference Proceedings, 20-24 October 2007, Warwick, Rhode Island. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.24017.
Full textPosavčić, Hana, and Ivan Halkijević. "Wastewater treatment of internal and individual drainage systems electrochemical processes." In 4th Symposium on Doctoral Studies in Civil Engineering. University of Zagreb Faculty of Civil Engineering, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5592/co/phdsym.2018.05.
Full textNovikov, Andrey, Anton Poddubsky, Evgenii Dugin, Olga Poddubskaya, Maksim Filimonov, and Regina Gurina. "Wastewater treatment and disposal of individual residential buildings in agriculture." In 18th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development. Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/erdev2019.18.n207.
Full textAnastasiou, Athanasios, Kostas Giokas, Dimitra Iliopoulou, and Dimitris Koutsouris. "Monitoring of compliance on an individual treatment through mobile innovations." In PETRA '15: 8th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2769493.2769567.
Full textOhta, K., Dai Kobayashi, T. Kobayashi, R. Taguchi, and H. Yokota. "Treatment of Rules in Individual Metadata of Flexible Contents Management." In 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06). IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdew.2006.153.
Full textAnastasiou, A., K. Giokas, and D. Koutsouris. "Monitoring of compliance on an individual treatment through mobile innovations." In 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/embc.2015.7320082.
Full textReports on the topic "Individual treatment"
Poulson, Robert S., Gary L. Gadbury, and David B. Allison. Treatment Heterogeneity and Individual Qualitative Interaction. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, August 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada547244.
Full textYu, Menggang, Jared D. Huling, Maureen Smith, and Jun Shao. Developing New Methods for Determining Treatment Benefits Based on Individual Patient Traits. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.25302/10.2020.me.140921219.
Full textMullahy, John. Individual Results May Vary: Elementary Analytics of Inequality-Probability Bounds, with Applications to Health-Outcome Treatment Effects. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23603.
Full textSteiner, G. R., and J. T. Watson. General design, construction, and operation guidelines: Constructed wetlands wastewater treatment systems for small users including individual residences. Second edition. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), May 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10105386.
Full textMadu, Laura, Jacqueline Sharp, and Bobby Bellflower. Efficacy of Integrating CBT for Mental Health Care into Substance Abuse Treatment in Patients with Comorbid Disorders of Substance Abuse and Mental Illness. University of Tennessee Health Science Center, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21007/con.dnp.2021.0004.
Full textEl Koussy, Mohamed M., and Nafisa M. Jadavji. Therapeutic Potential of Optogenetic Treatment for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Young Investigators, September 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.22186/jyi.33.4.77-82.
Full textMOSKALENKO, OLGA, and ROMAN YASKEVICH. QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT IN PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION (LITERATURE REVIEW). Science and Innovation Center Publishing House, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-1-2-178-184.
Full textCarneiro, Pedro, Edward Vytlacil, and James Heckman. Evaluating marginal policy changes and the average effect of treatment for individuals at the margin. Institute for Fiscal Studies, July 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1920/wp.cem.2009.2109.
Full textCarneiro, Pedro, James Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil. Evaluating Marginal Policy Changes and the Average Effect of Treatment for Individuals at the Margin. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w15211.
Full textSteuber, Lucas. Disordered Thought, Disordered Language: A corpus-based description of the speech of individuals undergoing treatment for schizophrenia. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.63.
Full text