Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Implicit learning / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Implicit learning'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Implicit learning.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Implicit learning.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Frick, Robert W., and Yuh-Shiow Lee. "Implicit Learning and Concept Learning." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 48, no. 3 (August 1995): 762–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401414.

Full text

Abstract:

In Experiments 1 and 2, subjects were exposed to letter strings that followed a pattern—the second letter was always the same. This exposure was disguised as a test of immediate memory. Following this training, subjects could discriminate new letter strings following the pattern from letter strings not following the pattern more often than would be expected by chance, which is the traditional evidence for concept learning. Discrimination was also better than would be predicted from subjects’ explicit report of the pattern, demonstrating the co-occurrence of concept learning and implicit learning. In Experiment 3, rules were learned explicitly. Discrimination was worse than would be predicted from subjects’ explicit report, validating the implicit learning paradigm. In Experiment 4, deviations from a prototypical pattern were presented during training. In the test of discrimination, prototypes were as familiar as old deviations and more familiar than new deviations, even when considering only implicit knowledge. Experiment 5 found implicit knowledge of a familiar concept. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the distinguishing features of a concept can be learned implicitly, and that one type of implicit learning is concept learning.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Holyoak, Keith J., and Merideth Gattis. "Implicit assumptions about implicit learning." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no. 3 (September 1994): 406–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00035159.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Seger, Carol Augart. "Implicit learning." Psychological Bulletin 115, no. 2 (1994): 163–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.163.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Frensch, Peter A., and Dennis Rünger. "Implicit Learning." Current Directions in Psychological Science 12, no. 1 (February 2003): 13–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01213.

Full text

Abstract:

Implicit learning appears to be a fundamental and ubiquitous process in cognition. Although defining and operationalizingimplicit learning remains a central theoretical challenge, scientists' understanding of implicit learning has progressed significantly. Beyond establishing the existence of “learning without awareness,” current research seeks to identify the cognitive processes that support implicit learning and addresses the relationship between learning and awareness of what was learned. The emerging view of implicit learning emphasizes the role of associative learning mechanisms that exploit statistical dependencies in the environment in order to generate highly specific knowledge representations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

El Ghaoui, Laurent, Fangda Gu, Bertrand Travacca, Armin Askari, and Alicia Tsai. "Implicit Deep Learning." SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science 3, no. 3 (January 2021): 930–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/20m1358517.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Liu, Yan, Yang Liu, Shenghua Zhong, and Songtao Wu. "Implicit Visual Learning." ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 8, no. 2 (January 18, 2017): 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2974024.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Hendrickx, Hilde, and Jan De Houwer. "Implicit Covariation Learning." Psychologica Belgica 37, no. 1-2 (January 1, 1997): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.907.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Ennen, Elizabeth. "Implicit practical learning." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no. 3 (September 1994): 404–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00035135.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Kuhn, Gustav, and Zoltán Dienes. "Implicit Learning of Nonlocal Musical Rules: Implicitly Learning More Than Chunks." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31, no. 6 (2005): 1417–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1417.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Abrahamse, Elger. "Editorial to the special issue Implicit Serial Learning." Advances in Cognitive Psychology 8, no. 2 (June 28, 2012): 70–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0104-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Pham, Theresa, Joel Hosung Kang, Alisha Johnson, and Lisa M. D. Archibald. "Feature-focusing constraints on implicit learning of function word and meaning associations." Applied Psycholinguistics 41, no. 2 (March 2020): 401–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0142716420000041.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractRecent research has begun to investigate implicit learning at the level of meaning. The general consensus is that implicitly linking a word with a meaning is constrained by existing linguistic knowledge. However, another factor to consider is the extent to which attention is drawn to the relevant meanings in implicit learning paradigms. We manipulated the presence of cue saliency during implicit rule learning for a grammatical form (i.e., articles) linked to meaning (i.e., animacy vs. varying notions of size). In a series of experiments, participants learned four novel words but did not know that article usage also depended on a hidden rule, creating an opportunity for implicit rule learning. We found implicit learning through the use of a highly salient meaning (Experiment 1) or if image size was made salient by being explicitly cued (Experiment 3), but not in a low salient paradigm for intrinsic object size (Experiment 2). The findings suggest that implicit learning of semantic information might not be as constrained as previously argued. Instead, implicit learning might be additionally influenced by feature-focusing cues that make the meaning contrasts more salient and thereby more readily available to learning.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Leung, Janny H. C., and John N. Williams. "THE IMPLICIT LEARNING OF MAPPINGS BETWEEN FORMS AND CONTEXTUALLY DERIVED MEANINGS." Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, no. 1 (February 21, 2011): 33–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0272263110000525.

Full text

Abstract:

The traditional implicit learning literature has focused primarily on the abstraction of statistical regularities in form-form connections. More attention has been recently directed toward the implicit learning of form-meaning connections, which might be crucial in the acquisition of natural languages. The current article reports evidence for implicit learning of a mapping between a novel set of determiners and thematic roles, obtained using a newly developed reaction time methodology. The results conclude that contextually derived form-meaning connections might be implicitly learned.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Kerz, Elma, Daniel Wiechmann, and Florian B. Riedel. "IMPLICIT LEARNING IN THE CROWD." Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39, no. 4 (April 3, 2017): 711–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s027226311700002x.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractA growing field of research has made use of a semiartificial language paradigm to investigate the role of awareness in L2 acquisition. A central and empirically still unresolved issue in this field concerns the possibility of learning implicitly, that is, without intention to learn and without awareness of what has been learned. Up until now, studies on implicit learning have mainly been conducted in laboratory settings under highly controlled conditions with university students as participants. The present study investigated whether and to what extent the results obtained in such settings can be extrapolated to the general population. Building on Williams (2005), we designed two crowdsourcing experiments that examined the learning of novel form-meaning mappings under incidental conditions in 163 participants. Our design allowed us to disentangle the effects of awareness at the level of noticing and understanding. The results of the two experiments demonstrated the implicit learning effect outside the lab in a more varied sample of participants and indicated that awareness at both levels appears to have a facilitative effect on learning outcomes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Berry, Dianne C., and Zoltan Dienes. "The relationship between implicit memory and implicit learning." British Journal of Psychology 82, no. 3 (August 1991): 359–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02405.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Folia, Vasiliki, Julia Uddén, Christian Forkstam, Martin Ingvar, Peter Hagoort, and Karl Magnus Petersson. "Implicit Learning and Dyslexia." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1145, no. 1 (December 2008): 132–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1416.012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Tseng, Philip, Tzu-Yu Hsu, Ovid J. L. Tzeng, Daisy L. Hung, and Chi-Hung Juan. "Probabilities in Implicit Learning." Perception 40, no. 7 (January 2011): 822–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p6833.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Ashworth, PD. "Handbook of Implicit Learning." Physiotherapy 84, no. 5 (May 1998): 240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9406(05)65559-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Willingham, Daniel B., and Kelly Goedert-Eschmann. "The Relation Between Implicit and Explicit Learning: Evidence for Parallel Development." Psychological Science 10, no. 6 (November 1999): 531–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00201.

Full text

Abstract:

Much research has focused on the separability of implicit and explicit learning, but less has focused on how they might interact. A recent model suggests that in the motor-skill domain, explicit knowledge can guide movement, and the implicit system learns in parallel, based on these movements. Functional imaging studies do not support that contention, however; they indicate that learning is exclusively implicit or explicit. In the experiment reported here, participants learned a motor sequencing task either implicitly or explicitly. At transfer, most of the stimuli were random, but the sequence occasionally appeared; thus, it was not obvious that explicit knowledge could be applied to the task. Nevertheless, participants with explicit training showed sequence knowledge equivalent to those with implicit training, implying that implicit knowledge had been acquired in parallel with explicit knowledge. This result has implications for the development of automaticity and of motor-skill learning.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Yang, Weiqi, and Michael Spece. "Implicit Adaptation to Low Rank Structure in Online Learning." International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing 11, no. 5 (September 2021): 339–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijmlc.2021.11.5.1058.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Nakamura, Daisuke. "Methodological considerations in studying awareness during learning: Part 1: Implicit learning." Polish Psychological Bulletin 44, no. 1 (March 1, 2013): 102–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2013-0011.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractMethodological problems of how awareness during learning should be measured have been extensively discussed and investigated in cognitive psychology. This review considers; 1)whether amnesics can perform implicit learning tasks at a similar level to normal controls, 2) whether differences in instructional orientations create dissociations in performance in tests of implicit and explicit knowledge, and 3) whether participants can retrospectively verbalise the learning outcomes. The paper concludes that; (1) amnesics’ implicit learning abilities differ from the normal controls, (2) instructions on implicit learning do not guarantee the occurrence of implicit learning, and (3) objective and subjective awareness measures used in the literature face inherent problems and so the awareness controversy remains unsettled.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Bankieris, Kaitlyn R., Ting Qian, and Richard N. Aslin. "Synesthetes perseverate in implicit learning: Evidence from a non-stationary statistical learning task." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72, no. 7 (December 11, 2018): 1771–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021818816285.

Full text

Abstract:

Synesthetes automatically and consistently experience additional sensory or cognitive perceptions in response to particular environmental stimuli. Recent evidence suggests that the propensity to develop synesthesia is genetic while the particular associations experienced by a given synesthete are influenced by learning. Despite the potential role of implicit learning in the formation of synesthetic associations, there has been minimal investigation of synesthetes’ implicit learning abilities. In this study, we examine linguistic-colour synesthetes’ ability to implicitly learn from and adjust to non-stationary statistics in a domain unrelated to their particular form of synesthesia. Engaging participants in a computer game Whack-the-mole, we utilise the online measure of reaction time to assess the time course of learning. Participants are exposed to “worlds” of probabilities that, unbeknownst to them, undergo unannounced changes, creating unpredictable statistical shifts devoid of accompanying cues. The same small set of probability worlds are repeated throughout the experiment to investigate participants’ ability to retain and learn from this repetitive probabilistic information. The reaction time data provide evidence that synesthetes require more information than nonsynesthetes to benefit from the non-stationary probability distributions. These findings demonstrate that linguistic-colour synesthetes’ implicit learning abilities—in a domain far from their synesthetic experiences—differ from those of nonsynesthetes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Curran, Tim. "Higher-Order Associative Learning in Amnesia: Evidence from the Serial Reaction Time Task." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9, no. 4 (July 1997): 522–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.4.522.

Full text

Abstract:

Patients with anterograde amnesia are commonly believed to exhibit normal implicit learning. Research with the serial reaction time (SRT) task suggests that normal subjects can implicitly learn visuospatial sequences through a process that is sensitive to higher-order information that is more complex than pairwise associations between adjacent stimuli. The present research reexamined SRT learning in a group of amnesic patients with a design intended to specifically address the learning of higher-order information. Despite seemingly normal learning effects on average, the results suggest that amnesic patients do not learn higher-order information as well as control subjects. These results suggest that amnesic patients have an associative learning impairment, even when learning is implicit, and that the medial temporal lobe and/or diencephalic brain areas typically damaged in cases of amnesia normally contribute to implicit sequence learning.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Foti, F., F. De Crescenzo, G. Vivanti, D. Menghini, and S. Vicari. "Implicit learning in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis." Psychological Medicine 45, no. 5 (August 15, 2014): 897–910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0033291714001950.

Full text

Abstract:

Background.Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are characterized by social communication difficulties and behavioural rigidity. Difficulties in learning from others are one of the most devastating features of this group of conditions. Nevertheless, the nature of learning difficulties in ASDs is still unclear. Given the relevance of implicit learning for social and communicative functioning, a link has been hypothesized between ASDs and implicit learning deficit. However, studies that have employed formal testing of implicit learning in ASDs provided mixed results.Method.We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined implicit learning in ASDs using serial reaction time (SRT), alternating serial reaction time (ASRT), pursuit rotor (PR), and contextual cueing (CC) tasks, and synthesized the data using meta-analysis. A total of 11 studies were identified, representing data from 407 individuals with ASDs and typically developing comparison participants.Results.The results indicate that individuals with ASDs do not differ in any task considered [SRT and ASRT task: standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.71 to 0.36; PR task: SMD −0.34, 95% CI −1.04 to 0.36; CC task: SMD 0.27, 95% CI −0.07 to 0.60].Conclusions.Based on our synthesis of the existing literature, we conclude that individuals with ASDs can learn implicitly, supporting the hypothesis that implicit learning deficits do not represent a core feature in ASDs.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Stark-Inbar, Alit, Meher Raza, Jordan A. Taylor, and Richard B. Ivry. "Individual differences in implicit motor learning: task specificity in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning." Journal of Neurophysiology 117, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 412–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.01141.2015.

Full text

Abstract:

In standard taxonomies, motor skills are typically treated as representative of implicit or procedural memory. We examined two emblematic tasks of implicit motor learning, sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning, asking whether individual differences in learning are correlated between these tasks, as well as how individual differences within each task are related to different performance variables. As a prerequisite, it was essential to establish the reliability of learning measures for each task. Participants were tested twice on a visuomotor adaptation task and on a sequence learning task, either the serial reaction time task or the alternating reaction time task. Learning was evident in all tasks at the group level and reliable at the individual level in visuomotor adaptation and the alternating reaction time task but not in the serial reaction time task. Performance variability was predictive of learning in both domains, yet the relationship was in the opposite direction for adaptation and sequence learning. For the former, faster learning was associated with lower variability, consistent with models of sensorimotor adaptation in which learning rates are sensitive to noise. For the latter, greater learning was associated with higher variability and slower reaction times, factors that may facilitate the spread of activation required to form predictive, sequential associations. Interestingly, learning measures of the different tasks were not correlated. Together, these results oppose a shared process for implicit learning in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning and provide insight into the factors that account for individual differences in learning within each task domain.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated individual differences in the ability to implicitly learn motor skills. As a prerequisite, we assessed whether individual differences were reliable across test sessions. We found that two commonly used tasks of implicit learning, visuomotor adaptation and the alternating serial reaction time task, exhibited good test-retest reliability in measures of learning and performance. However, the learning measures did not correlate between the two tasks, arguing against a shared process for implicit motor learning.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Khalifa, AlBara, Tsuneo Kato, and Seiichi Yamamoto. "Learning Effect of Implicit Learning in Joining-in-type Robot-assisted Language Learning System." International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 14, no. 02 (January 30, 2019): 105. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i02.9212.

Full text

Abstract:

The introduction of robots into language learning systems has been highly useful, especially in motivating learners to engage in the learning process and in letting human learners converse in more realistic conversational situations. This paper describes a novel robot-assisted language learning system that induces the human learner into a triad conversation with two robots through which he or she improves practical communication skills in various conversational situations. The system applies implicit learning as the main learning style for conveying linguistic knowledge, in an indirect way, through conversations on several topics. A series of experiments was conducted using 80 recruited participants to evaluate the effect of implicit learning and the retention effect in a joining-in-type robot-assisted language learning system. The experimental results show positive effects of implicit learning and repetitive learning in general. Based on these experimental results, we propose an improved method, integrating implicit learning and tutoring with corrective feedback in an adaptive way, to increase performance in practical communication skills even for a wide variety of proficiency of L2 learners.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Tikhonov, R. V., and N. V. Moroshkina. "Implicit Learning in Dyadic Interaction." Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology 6, no. 4 (2016): 75–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2016.406.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Jarvis, Peter. "Human Learning: implicit and explicit." Educação & Realidade 40, no. 3 (September 2015): 809–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-623648387.

Full text

Abstract:

Building on Polanyi's insight in The Tacit Dimension that we know more than we can tell, this paper argues that we actually experience more of reality than that of which we are conscious. Our conscious experience becomes the basis of explicit learning but that which we experience but of which we are not conscious is the basis of implicit learning and tacit knowledge.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Mizuhara, Yukio. "Implicit learning of event sequence." Japanese journal of psychology 65, no. 5 (1994): 383–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.65.383.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Udden, Julia, Vasiliki Folia, and Karl Magnus Petersson. "The Neuropharmacology of Implicit Learning." Current Neuropharmacology 8, no. 4 (December 1, 2010): 367–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157015910793358178.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Edwards, Kathleen S., and Myoungju Shin. "Media multitasking and implicit learning." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 79, no. 5 (May 1, 2017): 1535–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1319-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Neal, Andrew, and Beryl Hesketh. "Episodic knowledge and implicit learning." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, no. 1 (March 1997): 24–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03210770.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Stadler, Michael A. "Distinguishing implicit and explicit learning." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, no. 1 (March 1997): 56–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03210774.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Whittlesea, Bruce W. A., and Michael D. Dorken. "Implicit learning: Indirect, not unconscious." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, no. 1 (March 1997): 63–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03210775.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Jiang, Yuhong, and Marvin M. Chun. "Selective attention modulates implicit learning." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 54, no. 4 (November 2001): 1105–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713756001.

Full text

Abstract:

The effect of selective attention on implicit learning was tested in four experiments using the “contextual cueing” paradigm (Chun & Jiang, 1998, 1999). Observers performed visual search through items presented in an attended colour (e.g., red) and an ignored colour (e.g., green). When the spatial configuration of items in the attended colour was invariant and was consistently paired with a target location, visual search was facilitated, showing contextual cueing (Experiments 1, 3, and 4). In contrast, repeating and pairing the configuration of the ignored items with the target location resulted in no contextual cueing (Experiments 2 and 4). We conclude that implicit learning is robust only when relevant, predictive information is selectively attended.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

De Houwer, Jan, Frank Baeyens, and Hilde Hendrickx. "Implicit Learning of Evaluative Associations." Psychologica Belgica 37, no. 1-2 (January 1, 1997): 115. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.911.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Seger, Carol A. "Does Implicit Learning Require Attention?" Contemporary Psychology 49, no. 6 (December 2004): 717–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/004853.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Horan, William P., Michael F. Green, Barbara J. Knowlton, Jonathan K. Wynn, Jim Mintz, and Keith H. Nuechterlein. "Impaired implicit learning in schizophrenia." Neuropsychology 22, no. 5 (2008): 606–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012602.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Williams, John N. "The Neuroscience of Implicit Learning." Language Learning 70, S2 (June 2020): 255–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12405.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Thompson, Kelsey R., Daniel J. Sanchez, Abigail H. Wesley, and Paul J. Reber. "Ego Depletion Impairs Implicit Learning." PLoS ONE 9, no. 10 (October 2, 2014): e109370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109370.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Reber, Arthur S. "Implicit learning and tacit knowledge." Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118, no. 3 (1989): 219–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.219.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Andrade, Jackie. "Is learning during anaesthesia implicit?" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no. 3 (September 1994): 395–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00035044.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Carlson, Richard A. "Is implicit learning about consciousness?" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, no. 3 (September 1994): 400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00035093.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Gao, Xiaoqing, and Hugh R. Wilson. "Implicit learning of geometric eigenfaces." Vision Research 99 (June 2014): 12–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Jamieson, Randall K., John R. Vokey, and D. J. K. Mewhort. "Implicit learning is order dependent." Psychological Research 81, no. 1 (October 20, 2015): 204–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0715-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Heerey, Erin A., and Hemma Velani. "Implicit learning of social predictions." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, no. 3 (May 2010): 577–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Tanaka, Daisuke. "Sustained effect in implicit learning." Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 79 (September 22, 2015): 3EV—079–3EV—079. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.79.0_3ev-079.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Danion, Jean-Marie, Thierry Meulemans, Françoise Kauffmann-Muller, and Hester Vermaat. "Intact Implicit Learning in Schizophrenia." American Journal of Psychiatry 158, no. 6 (June 2001): 944–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.944.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Agafonov, A. Yu, S. N. Burmistrov, D. D. Kozlov, and A. P. Kryukova. "Implicit Learning of Combined Sequences." Integration of Education 22, no. 2 (June 29, 2018): 339–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.091.022.201802.339-352.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Choi, Jongwoon (Willie), Gary Hecht, Ivo D. Tafkov, and Kristy L. Towry. "Vicarious Learning under Implicit Contracts." Accounting Review 91, no. 4 (September 1, 2015): 1087–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-51293.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Employee contracts often allow for managerial discretion, such that the manager decides after observing an employee's performance how that employee will be rewarded or penalized. Importantly, the effects of such evaluation outcomes can extend beyond the employee(s) directly affected, because such outcomes can be observed by other employees within the firm. The net effect of such vicarious learning as an indirect control depends on the inferences employees make after observing a peer's evaluation outcome. In this study, we use an experiment to investigate whether the inferences observer-employees make about how managers evaluate and reward employee behavior depend on whether the valence of the observed outcome is positive or negative. Using the setting of a strategic performance measurement system, we test and find support for a causal model, in which the valence of the observed outcome influences observer-employees' inferences and subsequent behavioral focus via their psychological distance from, and their construal of, the observed outcome. Our results suggest that how observer-employees respond after observing a peer employee's evaluation outcome is asymmetric. Specifically, when contemplating their own behavior, employees who observe positive outcomes focus on the performance measures within the strategic performance measurement system, whereas those who observe negative outcomes focus on the underlying strategic construct.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Kaufman, Scott Barry, Colin G. DeYoung, Jeremy R. Gray, Luis Jiménez, Jamie Brown, and Nicholas Mackintosh. "Implicit learning as an ability." Cognition 116, no. 3 (September 2010): 321–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!