Journal articles on the topic 'Immunotoxicity'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Immunotoxicity.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Immunotoxicity.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Nakamura, Kazuichi. "Immunotoxicity study." Folia Pharmacologica Japonica 131, no. 3 (2008): 215–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1254/fpj.131.215.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Collinge, Mark. "Developmental immunotoxicity." Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 34, no. 1 (January 2019): S4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dmpk.2018.09.019.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Cunningham, Morven, Marco Iafolla, Yada Kanjanapan, Orlando Cerocchi, Marcus Butler, Lillian L. Siu, Philippe L. Bedard, et al. "Evaluation of liver enzyme elevations and hepatotoxicity in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy." PLOS ONE 16, no. 6 (June 11, 2021): e0253070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253070.

Full text
Abstract:
Background and aims Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly used in cancer therapy. Elevated liver enzymes frequently occur in patients treated with ICI but evaluation is poorly described. We sought to better understand causes of liver enzyme elevation, investigation and management. Methods Patients treated with anti-PD-1, PDL-1 or CTLA-4 therapy in Phase I/II clinical trials between August 2012 and December 2018 were included. Clinical records of patients with significant liver enzyme elevations were retrospectively reviewed. Results Of 470 ICI-treated patients, liver enzyme elevation occurred in 102 (21.6%), attributed to disease progression (56; 54.9%), other drugs/toxins (7; 6.9%), other causes (22; 21.6%) and ICI immunotoxicity (17; 16.7%; 3.6% of total cohort). Immunotoxicity was associated with higher peak ALT than other causes of enzyme elevation (N = 17; M = 217, 95% CI 145–324 for immunotoxicity, N = 103; M = 74, 95% CI 59–92 for other causes; ratio of means 0.34, 95% CI 0.19–0.60, p = <0.001) and higher ALT:AST ratio (M = 1.27, 95% CI 0.78–2.06 for immunotoxicity, M = 0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.80 for other causes, ratio of means 0.54, 95% CI 0.36–0.82, p = 0.004). Immunotoxicity was more often seen in patients with prior CPI exposure (41.2% of immunotoxicity vs 15.9% of patients without, p = 0.01), anti-CTLA-4 –containing ICI treatments (29.4% of immunotoxicity vs 6.8% of patients without, p = <0.001) and other organ immunotoxicity (76.5% of immunotoxicity vs 19.2% of patients without, p = <0.001). Cause for enzyme elevation was established in most patients after non-invasive investigation. Liver biopsy was reserved for four patients with atypical treatment response. Conclusions Liver enzyme elevation is common in patients receiving ICI, but often has a cause other than immunotoxicity. A biochemical signature with higher ALT and ALT/AST ratio, a history of prior ICI exposure and other organ immunotoxicities may help to identify patients at a higher likelihood of immunotoxicity. Liver biopsy can be safely deferred in most patients. We propose an approach to diagnostic evaluation in patients with liver enzyme elevations following ICI exposure.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Wang, Xinge, Na Li, Mei Ma, Yingnan Han, and Kaifeng Rao. "Immunotoxicity in Vitro Assays for Environmental Pollutants under Paradigm Shift in Toxicity Tests." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 1 (December 24, 2022): 273. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010273.

Full text
Abstract:
With the outbreak of COVID-19, increasingly more attention has been paid to the effects of environmental factors on the immune system of organisms, because environmental pollutants may act in synergy with viruses by affecting the immunity of organisms. The immune system is a developing defense system formed by all metazoans in the course of struggling with various internal and external factors, whose damage may lead to increased susceptibility to pathogens and diseases. Due to a greater vulnerability of the immune system, immunotoxicity has the potential to be the early event of other toxic effects, and should be incorporated into environmental risk assessment. However, compared with other toxicity endpoints, e.g., genotoxicity, endocrine toxicity, or developmental toxicity, there are many challenges for the immunotoxicity test of environmental pollutants; this is due to the lack of detailed mechanisms of action and reliable assay methods. In addition, with the strong appeal for animal-free experiments, there has been a significant shift in the toxicity test paradigm, from traditional animal experiments to high-throughput in vitro assays that rely on cell lines. Therefore, there is an urgent need to build high-though put immunotoxicity test methods to screen massive environmental pollutants. This paper reviews the common methods of immunotoxicity assays, including assays for direct immunotoxicity and skin sensitization. Direct immunotoxicity mainly refers to immunosuppression, for which the assays mostly use mixed immune cells or isolated single cells from animals with obvious problems, such as high cost, complex experimental operation, strong variability and so on. Meanwhile, there have been no stable and standard cell lines targeting immune functions developed for high-throughput tests. Compared with direct immunotoxicity, skin sensitizer screening has developed relatively mature in vitro assay methods based on an adverse outcome pathway (AOP), which points out the way forward for the paradigm shift in toxicity tests. According to the experience of skin sensitizer screening, this paper proposes that we also should seek appropriate nodes and establish more complete AOPs for immunosuppression and other immune-mediated diseases. Then, effective in vitro immunotoxicity assay methods can be developed targeting key events, simultaneously coordinating the studies of the chemical immunotoxicity mechanism, and further promoting the paradigm shift in the immunotoxicity test.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Sharma, R. P. "Evaluation of Pesticide Immunotoxicity." Toxicology and Industrial Health 4, no. 3 (July 1988): 373–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074823378800400309.

Full text
Abstract:
Immunotoxicologic effects have been reported for a number of pesticides. Since pesticides represent a large range of chemical classes, different types of chemicals may affect the complex immune system by a variety of mechanisms. A preliminary evaluation of pesticides for immunotoxicologic potential can best be incorporated in general subacute and chronic toxicity testing, with additional groups assigned for initial host-sensitivity assays. For chemicals that are possible candidates for immunotoxicity in preliminary assays, a comprehensive immunotoxicity screening has been suggested. Finally, emphasis should be given to mechanistic investigations to objectively assess the immunotoxicity of a new chemical and possible extrapolation to man. Animal models need to be developed for detecting the autoimmunologic potential of pesticides. This paper provides a brief listing of various approaches currently employed in the evaluation of immunotoxicity.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Chiappelli, Francesco, Michelle A. Kung, Pablo Villanueva, Patricia Lee, Patrick Frost, and Nerissa Prieto. "Immunotoxicity of Cocaethylene." Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology 17, no. 2 (January 1995): 399–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08923979509019759.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

SAKAGUCHI, Takehiro, Sanae SAKAGUCHI, and Yoshiro KUDO. "Immunotoxicity of Beryllium." Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi (Japanese Journal of Hygiene) 52, no. 4 (1998): 611–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1265/jjh.52.611.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Putman, E., J. W. Laan, and H. Loveren. "Assessing immunotoxicity: guidelines." Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology 17, no. 5 (October 2003): 615–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-8206.2003.00181.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Laan, Jan Willem, and Henk Loveren. "Assessing immunotoxicity: guidelines." Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology 19, no. 3 (June 2005): 329–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2005.00339.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Pfau, Jean C. "Immunotoxicity of asbestos." Current Opinion in Toxicology 10 (August 2018): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2017.11.005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Sharma, Raghubir P. "Immunotoxicity of Mycotoxins." Journal of Dairy Science 76, no. 3 (March 1993): 892–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(93)77415-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Bernier, Jacques, Michel Fournier, Yves Blais, Pierre Lombardi, Gaston Chevalier, and Krzysztof Krzystyniak. "Immunotoxicity of aminocarb." Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 30, no. 3 (March 1988): 238–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-3575(88)90038-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Bernier, Jacques, Marek Rola-Pleszczynski, Denis Flipo, Krzysztof Krzystyniak, and Michel Fournier. "Immunotoxicity of aminocarb." Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 36, no. 1 (January 1990): 35–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-3575(90)90018-w.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Bernier, J., M. Rola-Pleszczynski, K. Krzystyniak, and M. Fournier. "Immunotoxicity of aminocarb." International Journal of Immunopharmacology 10 (January 1988): 144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0192-0561(88)90521-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Fournier, M., K. Krzystyniak, D. Nadeau, B. Trottier, and G. Chevalier. "Immunotoxicity of dieldrin." International Journal of Immunopharmacology 10 (January 1988): 144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0192-0561(88)90522-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Takahiko Yoshida, Tadakatsu Shimamura, and Sadayoshi Shigeta. "Immunotoxicity of arsenic." International Journal of Immunopharmacology 13, no. 6 (January 1991): 772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0192-0561(91)90312-u.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Dansette, P. M., E. Bonierbale, C. Minoletti, P. H. Beaune, D. Pessayre, and D. Mansuy. "Drug-induced immunotoxicity." European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 23, no. 4 (December 1998): 443–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03189993.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Kenna, J. G. "Towards predicting immunotoxicity." Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 11, no. 2 (February 1990): 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-6147(90)90325-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Zhu, Yanzhu, Yanfei Li, Liguang Miao, Yingping Wang, Yanhuan Liu, Xijun Yan, Xuezhe Cui, and Haitao Li. "Immunotoxicity of aluminum." Chemosphere 104 (June 2014): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.052.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

., Raju S., Kavimani S. ., Uma Maheshwara rao V. ., and Sriramulu Reddy K. . "Immunotoxicants, Immunotoxicity and Immunotoxicity testing: An outline of in-vitro alternatives." Journal of Current Pharma Research 1, no. 4 (August 15, 2011): 341–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.33786/jcpr.2011.v01i04.008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Vial, T., B. Nicolas, and J. Descotes. "CLINICAL IMMUNOTOXICITY OF PESTICIDES." Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 48, no. 3 (June 1996): 215–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/009841096161294.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Toyoshima, Satoshi. "Immunotoxicity of environmental materials." Japan journal of water pollution research 10, no. 9 (1987): 528–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2965/jswe1978.10.528.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Dobrovolskaia, Marina A., Dori R. Germolec, and James L. Weaver. "Evaluation of nanoparticle immunotoxicity." Nature Nanotechnology 4, no. 7 (June 28, 2009): 411–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.175.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Wehner, Nancy G., Carolyn Gasper, George Shopp, Joyce Nelson, Ken Draper, Suezanne Parker, and Janet Clarke. "Immunotoxicity profile of natalizumab." Journal of Immunotoxicology 6, no. 2 (June 2009): 115–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15476910902977381.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Harris, David T., Debbie Sakiestewa, Dominic Titone, Raymond F. Robledo, R. Scott Young, and Mark Witten. "Jet fuel-induced immunotoxicity." Toxicology and Industrial Health 16, no. 7-8 (August 2000): 261–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074823370001600702.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

RODGERS, KATHLEEN, PAAL KLYKKEN, JOSHUA JACOBS, CARMELITA FRONDOZA, VESNA TOMAZIC, and JUDITH ZELIKOFF. "Immunotoxicity of Medical Devices." Toxicological Sciences 36, no. 1 (1997): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/36.1.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Van Loveren, H., J. Garssen, W. Slob, R. J. Vandebriel, W. H. deJong, and J. G. Vos. "Risk assessment and immunotoxicity." Toxicology Letters 95 (July 1998): 12–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4274(98)80048-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Hernández, M., R. Inocencio, C. Padilla, M. Macia, and F. F. del Campo. "Immunotoxicity of peptidic cyanotoxins." Toxicology Letters 95 (July 1998): 177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4274(98)80705-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Lee, Dong. "On-target related immunotoxicity." Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 34, no. 1 (January 2019): S4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dmpk.2018.09.020.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Wheeler, Jennifer. "Nonclinical immunotoxicity testing assessment." Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 34, no. 1 (January 2019): S4—S5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dmpk.2018.09.022.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Johnson, Arthur G., and Jean Regal. "Immunotoxicity of immunotherapeutic agents." Springer Seminars in Immunopathology 8, no. 4 (December 1985): 347–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01857389.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Esa, Ahmed H., Glenn A. Warr, and David S. Newcombe. "Immunotoxicity of organophosphorus compounds." Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology 49, no. 1 (October 1988): 41–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-1229(88)90093-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Elsabahy, Mahmoud, and Karen L. Wooley. "Reassessment of nanomaterials immunotoxicity." Nano Today 20 (June 2018): 10–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2018.01.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Descotes, Jacques. "Immunotoxicity of monoclonal antibodies." mAbs 1, no. 2 (March 2009): 104–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/mabs.1.2.7909.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

van Loveren, Henk, Johan Garssen, Cees de Heer, and Joseph G. Vos. "Risk Assessment and Immunotoxicity." Drug Information Journal 31, no. 4 (October 1997): 1363–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009286159703100439.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Descotes, Jacques. "Methods of evaluating immunotoxicity." Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 2, no. 2 (March 24, 2006): 249–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2.2.249.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Lísková, A. "Immunotoxicity Study of Atrazine." Toxicology Letters 78 (August 1995): 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/03784-2749(59)48296-.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

RODGERS, K., P. KLYKKEN, J. JACOBS, C. FRONDOZA, V. TOMAZIC, and J. ZELIKOFF. "Immunotoxicity of Medical Devices☆☆☆." Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 36, no. 1 (March 1997): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/faat.1996.2279.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Descotes, J., B. Nicolas, and T. Vial. "Assessment of immunotoxic effects in humans." Clinical Chemistry 41, no. 12 (December 1, 1995): 1870–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/41.12.1870.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The immunotoxic effects of chemicals are varied and markedly different depending on the underlying pathogenesis, namely, direct immunotoxicity (including immunosuppression, immunodepression, and immunostimulation), hypersensitivity, and autoimmunity. A large number of immunological endpoints and functional assays have been proposed for use as biomarkers of immunotoxicity, but they often lack sensitivity or are poorly standardized, so that their relevance in assessing immunotoxic effects in humans is at best ill established. Examining sentinel immunopathological events in individuals with a defined history of chemical exposure is another approach, presumably more cost-effective at the present time. A multicenter collaboration is mandated, however, because these events are rare. We expect that progress in new technologies, e.g., molecular biology, will provide the sensitive and reliable biomarkers of immunotoxicity that are currently lacking.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Langezaal, Ingrid, Sebastian Hoffmann, Thomas Hartung, and Sandra Coecke. "Evaluation and Prevalidation of an Immunotoxicity Test Based on Human Whole-blood Cytokine Release." Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 30, no. 6 (November 2002): 581–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026119290203000605.

Full text
Abstract:
Immunotoxicology is a relatively new field in toxicology, and is one of emerging importance, because immunotoxicity appears to contribute to the development of cancer, autoimmune disorders, allergies and other diseases. At present, there is a lack of human cell-based immunotoxicity assays for predicting the toxicity of xenobiotics toward the immune system in a simple, fast, economical and reliable way. Existing immunotoxicity tests are mainly performed in animals, although species differences favour human-based testing. Whole-blood cytokine release models have attracted increasing interest, and are broadly used for pharmacological in vitro and ex vivo studies, as well as for pyrogenicity testing. We have adapted those methods for immunotoxicity testing, to permit the potency testing of immunostimulants and immunosuppressants. Following stimulation with a lipopolysaccharide or staphylococcal enterotoxin B, monocytes and lymphocytes release interleukin-1β and interleukin-4, respectively. Thirty-one pharmaceutical compounds, with known effects on the immune system, were used to optimise and standardise the method, by analysing their effects on cytokine release. The in vitro results were expressed as IC50 values for immunosuppression, and SC4 (fourfold increase) values for immunostimulation, and compared with therapeutic serum concentrations of the compounds in patients, and in vivo LD50 values from animal studies. The in vitro results correlated well with the in vivo data, so the test appears to reflect immunomodulation. Results were reproducible (CV = 20 ± 5%), and the method could be transferred to another laboratory (r2 = 0.99). We therefore propose this method for further validation and for use in immunotoxicity testing strategies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Holladay, S. D., and B. L. Blaylock. "The mouse as a model for developmental immunotoxicology." Human & Experimental Toxicology 21, no. 9-10 (September 2002): 525–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0960327102ht292oa.

Full text
Abstract:
The laboratory mouse has been the most extensively used model system for demonstrating postnatal immune deficits following perinatal immunotoxicant exposure. Assays utilized have historically been those developed for adult mice. Clear gaps in the available database exist, however, regarding the predictive strength of adult mouse immune screens for detecting either transient or long-lasting postnatal immune suppression. Limited information is also available regarding postnatal ages when various immune assays can be first employed to detect developmental immunotoxicity in mice. Furthermore, difficulties and expense inherent with breeding of in-bred mice, as used for adult immunotoxicity studies, raise questions regarding the feasibility of an in-bred mouse model as a standard, widely available developmental immunotoxicity testing system. These and additional concerns will need to be addressed as a model system with utility for studying developmental immunotoxicants is produced.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Lin, Wang, Tien-Chieh Hung, Tomofumi Kurobe, Yi Wang, and Pinhong Yang. "Microcystin-Induced Immunotoxicity in Fishes: A Scoping Review." Toxins 13, no. 11 (October 29, 2021): 765. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13110765.

Full text
Abstract:
Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) have been present on Earth for over 2 billion years, and can produce a variety of bioactive molecules, such as cyanotoxins. Microcystins (MCs), the most frequently detected cyanotoxins, pose a threat to the aquatic environment and to human health. The classic toxic mechanism of MCs is the inhibition of the protein phosphatases 1 and 2A (PP1 and PP2A). Immunity is known as one of the most important physiological functions in the neuroendocrine-immune network to prevent infections and maintain internal homoeostasis in fish. The present review aimed to summarize existing papers, elaborate on the MC-induced immunotoxicity in fish, and put forward some suggestions for future research. The immunomodulatory effects of MCs in fish depend on the exposure concentrations, doses, time, and routes of exposure. Previous field and laboratory studies provided strong evidence of the associations between MC-induced immunotoxicity and fish death. In our review, we summarized that the immunotoxicity of MCs is primarily characterized by the inhibition of PP1 and PP2A, oxidative stress, immune cell damage, and inflammation, as well as apoptosis. The advances in fish immunoreaction upon encountering MCs will benefit the monitoring and prediction of fish health, helping to achieve an ecotoxicological goal and to ensure the sustainability of species. Future studies concerning MC-induced immunotoxicity should focus on adaptive immunity, the hormesis phenomenon and the synergistic effects of aquatic microbial pathogens.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Schamber, R. A., E. L. Belden, and M. F. Raisbeck. "Immunotoxicity of Chronic Selenium Exposure." Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation 195, no. 1 (1995): 384–394393. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/jasmr95010384.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Stefanidou, Maria, Ariadni C. Loutsidou, Christos T. Chasapis, and Chara A. Spiliopoulou. "Immunotoxicity of Cocaine and Crack." Current Drug Abuse Reviewse 4, no. 2 (June 1, 2011): 95–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874473711104020095.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Corsini, E. "Evaluating cytokines in immunotoxicity testing." Toxicology Letters 350 (September 2021): S8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4274(21)00251-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Wesley, Sarah F., Aya Haggiagi, Kiran T. Thakur, and Philip L. De Jager. "Neurological Immunotoxicity from Cancer Treatment." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 13 (June 23, 2021): 6716. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136716.

Full text
Abstract:
The emergence of immune-based treatments for cancer has led to a growing field dedicated to understanding and managing iatrogenic immunotoxicities that arise from these agents. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can develop as isolated events or as toxicities affecting multiple body systems. In particular, this review details the neurological irAEs from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapies. The recognition and treatment of neurological irAEs has variable success, depending on the severity and nature of the neurological involvement. Understanding the involved mechanisms, predicting those at higher risk for irAEs, and establishing safety parameters for resuming cancer immunotherapies after irAEs are all important fields of ongoing research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Descotes, Jacques, Brigitte Nicolas, Thierry Vial, and Jean-François Nicolas. "Biomarkers of immunotoxicity in man." Biomarkers 1, no. 2 (January 1996): 77–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13547509609088673.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Assumaidaee, Ajwad A. M. "Zearalenone Mycotoxicosis: Pathophysiology and Immunotoxicity." Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine 44, no. 1 (June 28, 2020): 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.30539/ijvm.v44i1.932.

Full text
Abstract:
Mycotoxicosis refers to the deleterious pathological effects of different types toxins produced by some worldwide distributing fungi. Mycotoxins, as secondary metabolites are affecting different organs and systems both in animal and human beings. Zeralenone (ZEA), the well-known estrogenic mycotoxins, is an immunotoxic agent. This macrocyclic beta-resorcyclic acid lactone, is mycotoxin procreated as a secondary metabolic byproduct by several types of Fusarium, encompassing F. roseum,F. culmorum, F. graminearum and different other types. Attributing to its potent estrogenic activity, ZEA has been incriminated as one of the major causes of female reproductive disorders. Thus, the purpose of the present review article is to appraise the pathophysiological consequences and sub sequent explore the progress in the research field of zearalenone immunotoxicities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Karol, Meryl H., and Ruzhi Jin. "Mechanisms of immunotoxicity to isocyanates." Chemical Research in Toxicology 4, no. 5 (September 1991): 503–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx00023a001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Voccia, I., B. Blakley, P. Brousseau, and M. Fournier. "Immunotoxicity of pesticides: a review." Toxicology and Industrial Health 15, no. 1 (January 1, 1999): 119–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/074823399678846637.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography