Academic literature on the topic 'Hoffman-La Roche AG'

Abstract Introduction: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status reflects depth of response and informs prognosis after first-line therapy in patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL). In the GALLIUM study (NCT01332968), the primary endpoint of investigator (INV)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in previously untreated FL pts was significantly improved with obinutuzumab (GA101; G)- versus rituximab (R)-based immunochemotherapy treatment. We previously reported consistently higher MRD response rates with G- versus R-based treatment at the end of induction (EOI) (92% vs 85%, respectively; p=0.0041; Pott et al. ASH 2016). Here we report the correlation of MRD response at EOI with updated PFS data and the results of MRD response assessment during maintenance treatment and follow-up. We also assessed MRD responses and outcome in pts who remained MRD-positive at EOI. Methods: Previously untreated pts aged ≥18 years with FL requiring treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive 6-8 cycles of G (1000mg IV on days [D] 1, 8, and 15 of cycle [C] 1 and D1 of C2-6 or 8) or R (375mg/m2 IV on D1) plus standard chemotherapy (CHOP, CVP, or bendamustine). Responding pts received the same antibody as maintenance every 2 months for up to 2 years. MRD status was assessed by real-time quantitative (RQ)-PCR assays at mid-induction (MI) in peripheral blood (PB), at EOI in PB and bone marrow, at 4-monthly intervals during maintenance in PB, and at 6-monthly intervals during follow-up in PB, and was defined as negative (MRD response) if RQ-PCR and subsequent nested PCR were negative in all samples analyzed at the respective time point. INV-assessed PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods (data cut-off, February 12, 2018). Pts were included in the various analyses if they had evaluable MRD data and achieved a complete or partial response at EOI. Results: After 57 months' median follow-up, MRD evaluable pts (n=634/1202 randomized FL pts) who had a MRD-negative response at EOI (n=564) continued to have a longer PFS than those who had a MRD-positive response at EOI (n=70; hazard ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.26, 0.56; p<0.0001; Figure 1), which was irrespective of treatment arm (Figure 2). Of the MRD evaluable pts who continued on maintenance treatment, a MRD-negative response was observed at EOI in 300/324 (92.6%) pts in the G arm versus 264/310 (85.2%) in the R arm (p=0.0034). The majority of the MRD-negative pts remained negative during maintenance. No difference in the MRD relapse rate (conversion to MRD positivity) was observed between pts treated with G or R maintenance (6.3% vs 6.1%, respectively). Two-thirds of MRD-negative responses were sustained throughout the maintenance period (G, 67.0%; R, 63.2%), with a rate of disease progression or death of 11.4% in the G arm and 15.5% in the R arm. Twenty-four pts in the G-chemo arm and 46 pts in the R-chemo arm were MRD positive at EOI but eligible for maintenance treatment based on clinical (CT-based) response. Of these, 22 (92%) pts in the G-chemo arm (18 within the first 4 months of maintenance treatment) and 36 (78%) pts in the R-chemo arm (27 within the first 4 months) achieved MRD negativity during maintenance. Of the 12 pts who never achieved an MRD response, 8 progressed or died within 7 months of EOI, 1 progressed after 15 months, 1 progressed after 26 months, and 2 remained MRD positive during maintenance up to month 8 and month 12, respectively, but had no documented tumor progression until D1348 and D1709. Conclusions: These data confirm the prognostic value of MRD status at EOI in previously untreated FL pts receiving immunochemotherapy. Analysis of MRD kinetics revealed that most of the pts who achieved MRD negativity at EOI sustained their responses during maintenance. The majority of pts who were MRD positive at EOI achieved MRD negativity during the first 4 months of maintenance. While this is likely to be indicative of the efficacy of continued treatment, it also suggests that response kinetics can be slower than in those pts who have an early MRD response at MI, and that responses that are beyond the sensitivity of the MRD assay may be less deep. Importantly, pts who failed to achieve MRD negativity at EOI or during early maintenance had a high chance of experiencing early progression or death. These data demonstrate the prognostic value of MRD response assessments in previously untreated FL pts receiving immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Hoster: F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Roche Pharma AG: Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Unterhalt:F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel support. van der Jagt:F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding. Janssens:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Ad board, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Ad board, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kneba:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mayer:Affimed: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Pocock:Kent & Canterbury Hospital: Employment. Knapp:Roche: Employment. Danesi:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Nielsen:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Other: Ownership interests PLC. Brown:PAREXEL, external business partner with Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn, UK: Employment. Mundt:Roche: Employment, Other: Ownership interests PLC. Marcus:Gilead: Consultancy; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel support and lecture fees; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support and lecture fees . Hiddemann:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract Background: The clinical course of follicular lymphoma (FL) is characterized by a slow progression over years with continuous relapses despite good response to initial treatment. The median overall survival is 10 to more than 15 years. Standard therapy for patients requiring treatment consists of an anti-CD 20 antibody combined with chemotherapy followed by antibody maintenance. With this combination a 1-year-PFS of 93% was seen in the GLSG-2000 trial (Hiddemann et al, Blood 2005). Because of the substantial side effects of chemotherapy such as infections, secondary malignancies and impairment of the stem cell reserve novel "chemotherapy-free" treatment approaches could substantially improve the treatment tolerability in FL. The BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib has demonstrated promising activity in patients with iNHL, CLL and MCL. Anticipating the recent reports on a superior activity of obinutuzumab as compared to rituximab in the GALLIUM trial (Marcus et al., NEJM 2017), the GLSG initiated a phase II study combining ibrutinib and obinutuzumab to explore the efficacy and safety of this "chemotherapy-free" alternative. Methods: ALTERNATIVE is a prospective multicenter single-arm phase 2 study of the combination of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab in 98 patients with previously untreated FL and a high tumor burden (defined by modified GELF criteria) in need of treatment. Induction comprises 6 cycles of obinutuzumab at a dose of 1000 mg by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 2-6 to be given every 21 days. Ibrutinib is administered orally at a dose of 560 mg once daily throughout all 6 cycles. In patients with at least partial response (defined by Cheson Response Criteria 2007) after the end of induction, maintenance with obinutuzumab (1000mg every 8 weeks) plus ibrutinib (560mg daily) is given for an additional 24 months. In patients remaining MRD positive at 30 months ibrutinib is continued for another 12 months in an extended maintenance setting without obinutuzumab. The primary efficacy endpoint is the rate of investigator-assessed PFS one year after registration. Response rates at end of induction, after one year and after end of maintenance, duration of response, percentage of progression during induction and maintenance, time to treatment failure, overall survival, duration of molecular remission in MRD negative patients and safety are key secondary endpoints. Results: 98 patients with advanced stage FL were included, The median age was 59 years (29-81), 60% were male and 40% had a high risk FLIPI, 90% stage III/IV disease and 10% were stage II with a high tumor burden. Response to in induction was 90% (87/97) with 85% (82/97) PR and 5% (5/97) CR. 5 patients (5%) progressed during induction. Of the 82 patients with PR after end of induction, 8 patients achieved a CR during the first 6 months of maintenance treatment. 95 patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint of 1-year-PFS and 76 patients (80%) remained alive and free of progression at this timepoint. 18 patients progressed in the first year, two of whom died due to progressive disease. One additional death was caused by a non-lymphoma related event. An MRD-marker was found in 65 patients. MRD at the end of induction was evaluable for 63 patients. 44 patients (70%) were MRD negative after induction treatment. Of the 42 patients with follow-up MRD peripheral blood or bone marrow samples, 35 (83%) were MRD negative one year after registration. Therapy was generally well tolerated. Most common adverse events were diarrhea in 30% of patients, rash in 25% and fatigue and nasopharyngitis (common cold) in 23% and 20%, respectively. Concerning hematotoxicity grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombopenia were seen in 8% and 4% of patients, respectively. Severe (>=grade 3) infectious complications were rare (6% pneumonia/bronchitis, 2% sepsis, 7% other infections). Conclusions: The chemotherapy - free combination of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab showed high anti-lymyphoma activity with high overall response rates and a high proportion of MRD negativity at one year. While the combination of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab was associated with a low toxicity profile, the combination was inferior to the published results of conventional immunochemotherapies in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint (1-year-PFS). Further evaluations might demonstrate whether subgroups exist which particularly benefit clinically from this low toxicity regime. Figure Figure. Disclosures Schmidt: Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Grants; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants. Buske:Bayer: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Viardot:Amgen: Consultancy; Gilead Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Keller:BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; MSD: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Graeven:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria. Marks:Merck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Hänel:Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Liersch:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria. Dürig:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hoster:Roche Pharma AG: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Unterhalt:F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel support. Hiddemann:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of B non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) and makes up 40% of all adult lymphomas. Like most carcinomas, NHL grow as spherical tumors. Based on carcinoma 3D models (often described as spheroids) it is acknowledged that spatial organization may profoundly affect tumor cell behavior since important functions are dictated by the collective properties of a cell population rather than those of a single cell. These include growth, metastasis, cell-to-matrix and cell-to-cell interaction, as well as intracellular signaling and resistance to anti-tumor agents or even immune escape. Spatial organization can exert these effects in cancer cells by affecting gene expression profiles or influencing major signaling pathways such as those driven by MAPK, Akt and oncogenic products such as HER-2. More importantly, spatial organization is known to influence the response to antibodies such as Trastuzumab or Pertuzumab. Conventional 2D NHL cell culture models do not reflect the true effects of antibodies as they occur in vivo and may be of limited use. Thus, we recently created a NHL 3D culture system, the so-called Multicellular Aggregates of Lymphoma Cells (MALC) model, using a modification of the “hanging drop” method. This model is not only useful for studying FL biology, but also for evaluating tumor sensitivity to antibodies since diffusion/distribution is different within a solid 3D tumor. In this study, we present transcriptomic and extracellular matrix proteins expression profiles in 2D, 3D FL cell cultures and patients biopsies, and observed that MALC, but not 2D cultures, display similarities to patients samples. Indeed, we observe an upregulation of genes involved in the response to hypoxia, activation of NFκB pathway and negative regulation of cell cycle promoting the emergence of chemoresistant quiescent cells. Moreover, MALC, in contrast to 2D cultures but as observed in biopsies, exhibit higher expression of fibronectin, laminin, vitronectin and collagen. Recently, we showed that spatial organization also influence response to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies such as Rituximab and Obinutuzumab. Here, we investigate the antibody-dependant cell cytotoxicity induced by these two monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies in the MALC model: cell cytotoxicity, effector and target cells signaling, and spatial localization are presented. Thus, we present an invaluable model for further investigation of FL biology, and also for the development/screening of new genotoxic drugs and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in lymphoma. Disclosures: Bezombes: Roche: Research Funding. Decaup:Institut de Recherche Roche: Employment. Klein:Roche Glycart AG: Employment. Varoqueaux:F. Hoffman-La Roche AG: Employment. Savina:Roche S.A.S: Employment.

Abstract Introduction: Advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease. About 20% of patients have early progression of disease (POD) and short overall survival (OS). We have previously shown that integration of lymphoma-specific gene mutations and clinical factors improves pretreatment risk stratification (Pastore, 2015) and prediction of early POD (i.e., within 24 months, POD24; Jurinovic, 2016). Recently, we have shown that high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is an effective treatment option for eligible patients with high-risk disease as defined by POD24 (Jurinovic, 2018). Here, we aimed to explore whether HDT/ASCT is an effective frontline therapy for patients identified to be high-risk by clinical (i.e., FLIPI) or clinicogenetic risk models (i.e., m7-FLIPI, POD24-PI). Methods: We performed targeted DNA deep-sequencing of >150 genes in available diagnostic FL biopsies from 165 patients ≤60 years with advanced FL from the GLSG2000 trial who uniformly received R-CHOP as frontline treatment. Of these, 87 patients (53%) were randomized to receive consolidative HDT/ASCT, 78 (47%) were randomized to interferon maintenance. We performed intention-to-treat (ITT) survival and regression analyses to explore whether known clinical and clinicogenetic risk factors can be overcome by ASCT. Results: The HDT/ASCT and no-HDT/ASCT cohorts were balanced regarding age (48 vs 50 years), sex (49% vs 64% male patients), high-risk FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI; 25% vs 29%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score >1 (6% vs 5%) and mutation status of EZH2 (23% vs 18%) and TP53 (3% vs 3%). The incidence of POD24 was not significantly lower in the HDT/ASCT cohort (8% vs 14%, p=0.32). After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) rates in the HDT/ASCT and no-HDT/ASCT cohorts were 77% and 69% (HR 0.7, p=0.16), 5-year OS rates were 95% and 90% (HR 0.6, p=0.21), respectively. The high-risk cohorts identified by FLIPI, m7-FLIPI, and POD24-PI comprised 27% (n=45), 18% (n=29) and 22% (n=37) of patients, respectively (Fig. A). The m7-FLIPI reclassified 10% (n=16) of patients from high-risk FLIPI to low-risk m7-FLIPI. The POD24-PI reclassified 5% (n=9) of patients from high-risk FLIPI to low-risk POD24-PI; one patient was reclassified from low-risk FLIPI to high-risk POD24-PI. Patients identified to be high-risk by all three indices had shorter FFS (FLIPI: HR 2.8, p=0.0002; m7-FLIPI: HR 3.0, p=0.0003; POD24-PI: HR 2.5, p=0.0013), but OS was not different (FLIPI: HR 1.4, p=0.47; m7-FLIPI: HR 1.5, p=0.45; POD24-PI: HR 1.5, p=0.47). The risk to develop POD24 was increased in high-risk patients (FLIPI: OR 4.4, p=0.007; m7-FLIPI: OR 4.8, p=0.005; POD24-PI: OR 4.3, p=0.008). Consolidative HDT/ASCT did not prolong FFS in high-risk patients as defined by FLIPI (HR 1.2, p=0.67), m7-FLIPI (HR 1.2, p=0.70; Fig. B) and POD24-PI (HR 1.3, p=0.63; Fig. B). Similarly, OS was not significantly improved in all three high-risk cohorts (FLIPI: HR 0.2, p=0.13; m7-FLIPI: HR n/a, p>0.99; and POD24-PI: HR 0.3, p=0.22). In low-risk patients, HDT/ASCT was associated with a non-significant trend towards prolonged FFS (FLIPI: HR 0.5, p=0.061; m7-FLIPI: HR 0.6, p=0.16; POD24-PI: HR 0.5, p=0.068; Fig. B), but again OS was not significantly different (FLIPI: HR 0.8, p=0.69; m7-FLIPI: HR 0.8, p=0.66; and POD24-PI: HR 0.7, p=0.52). Conclusions: Our ITT-analysis confirms that consolidative HDT/ASCT should not be offered to unselected cohorts of patients with previously untreated, advanced FL after R-CHOP. Also, our current clinicogenetic risk models are not optimized to select high-risk patients who may benefit from frontline HDT/ASCT. The fraction of patients identified to be high-risk by FLIPI, m7-FLIPI and POD24-PI is low when applied to younger, medically fit patients. Moreover, the fraction of patients being reclassified by integrating gene mutation data is low in this patient cohort. Therefore, we are developing specific stratification algorithms for younger, medically fit patients who are eligible for dose-intensified approaches. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Klapper: F.Hoffman-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schmitz:Riemser: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Celgene: Other: Travel grants; Roche: Honoraria. Hess:CTI: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Unterhalt:F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel support. Dreyling:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schmidt:Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Grants; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Honoraria. Hoster:F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Roche Pharma AG: Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Hiddemann:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weigert:Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Eculizumab, an anti-C5 antibody, was approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with symptomatic paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) in 2007 and has been the standard of care for over a decade. However, published data on real-world outcomes of eculizumab-treated pts with PNH are limited. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical profile of pts with PNH treated with eculizumab by characterizing their short- and long-term laboratory and clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study (Versmold et al, Blood 2020) used preexisting medical records of eculizumab-treated pts with PNH (treatment duration ≥24 weeks [wks]) treated at the University Hospital Essen, Germany prior to April 2018. Anonymized data were collected via electronic case report forms. Laboratory data were extracted from the hospital computer system. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hemoglobin, absolute reticulocyte count (ARC), and bilirubin profiles were assessed at baseline (12 months before treatment) and during the treatment phase (up to 13.2 years [yrs] follow-up). Breakthrough hemolysis (BTH) was defined as ≥1 new symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (including fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, dyspnea, anemia [hemoglobin &lt;10 g/dL], major adverse vascular event [including thrombosis], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction in the presence of elevated LDH [≥2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN)] after reduction of LDH to ≤1.5 × ULN). Extravascular hemolysis was defined as persistence of reticulocytes &gt;100 × 10 9/L with bilirubin &gt;1 × ULN and positive direct Coombs test or reticulocytes &gt;100 × 10 9/L with bilirubin &gt;1 × ULN and ≥1 positive C3c or C3d test. Complete hematologic response was zero blood transfusions with hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL and LDH ≤1.5 × ULN and major hematologic response was zero blood transfusions with hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL and LDH &gt;1.5 × ULN within any 24-wk window (Risitano et al, Front Immunol 2019). Transfusion-dependence was ≥2 blood transfusions within any 24-wk period. Pts transferred from other centers or within 24 wks of treatment were excluded due to missing baseline data. Results: The study included 56 pts with PNH (mean age: 42.9 yrs [± 17.6]; 46.4% female) treated with eculizumab for ≥24 wks (mean follow-up: 5.24 yrs [± 3.25]) during the study period. The median duration from diagnosis to starting eculizumab was 1.57 yrs. Overall, 18 pts (32.1%) had aplastic anemia at diagnosis, 10 (17.9%) had symptoms of high disease activity, and 34 (60.7%) had a blood transfusion in the prior 12 months. The most reported disease-related symptoms at baseline were anemia (28.6%), fatigue (26.8%), thrombosis (21.4%), dyspnea (17.9%), dysphagia (10.7%), erectile dysfunction (10.0%), kidney complications (8.9%), abdominal pain (8.9%), and hemoglobinuria (7.1%). Mean hemoglobin (n=44) was 9.67 g/dL [± 2.06] and LDH in the past 12 months (n=47) was 1480 U/L [± 1010]. During the first 24-wk treatment phase, 37% (20/54) of pts had LDH &gt;1.5 × ULN, 31% (14/45) had ARC &gt;1.5 × ULN, and 17% (8/47) had hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL (Figure). Among pts with response data, 15% (7/47) had complete hematologic response and 2% (1/47) had major hematologic response within 24 wks. Documented BTH with symptoms occurred in 11% (6/56). Moreover, 23% (13/56) of pts were transfusion-dependent, increasing to 39% (22/56) when including pts who had ≥1 transfusion during the first 24 wks of treatment. Six pts (11%) received a higher-than-labeled dose (600 mg intravenous [IV] weekly for 4 wks, 900 mg IV 1 wk later, then 900 mg IV every 2 wks thereafter) of eculizumab. Over the long term (ie, between 25 and 246 wks), 11.1-34.7% of pts received blood transfusions and 7.0-21.7% had LDH &gt;1.5 × ULN in any 24-wk window; whereas 36.1-72.7% had ARC &gt;1.5 × ULN (Figure). Moreover, 65.8-77.3% of pts had hemoglobin &lt;12 g/dL within any 24-wk period and 69.0-77.2% did not meet the criteria for major or complete hematologic response during any 24-wk period from wks 25 to 246. During the treatment phase, no meningococcal infections were reported. Conclusions: In this long-term real-world study, a considerable proportion of pts with PNH treated with eculizumab did not achieve optimal clinical outcomes with an ongoing burden of disease (ie, low hemoglobin level with high reticulocyte count due to extravascular hemolysis, BTH, etc.). Future exploration of other therapies that improve pt outcomes could help to address remaining unmet medical needs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Alashkar: Alexion: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria; Bluebird Bio: Honoraria. Ofori-Asenso: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Xu: F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG: Current Employment. Liu: Genesis Research: Current Employment. Katz: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Shang: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Roeth: Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bioverativ, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kira: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Introduction: Venetoclax (Ven) is a highly selective oral inhibitor of key apoptosis regulator BCL-2, which is overexpressed in CLL. MURANO (a randomized Phase III study) compared fixed-duration VenR with standard bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in R/R CLL. The superior progression-free survival (PFS) of VenR versus BR was established in the first pre-planned analysis (Seymour et al. N Engl J Med 2018); continued PFS benefit was seen with longer follow-up and after all patients (pts) had completed therapy (Kater et al. J Clin Oncol 2019). We now present data from a further analysis (median follow-up 48 months) when all pts had been off Ven treatment for median 22 months. Methods: As previously published, pts were randomized to 6 cycles of VenR then Ven 400mg once daily for 2 years in total, or 6 cycles of BR. PFS status was based on investigator assessment. Central analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) status in peripheral blood (PB) was performed at Cycle 4, end of combination treatment (EOCT) then every 3-6 months. Pts were categorized as undetectable MRD (uMRD; &lt;1 CLL cell/10,000 leukocytes [&lt;10-4]), low-MRD (≥10-4 - &lt;10-2), or high-MRD (≥10-2) status. All p-values are descriptive. Safety data collected for the current analysis period were pre-specified adverse events (AEs) of concern, serious AEs (SAEs) related to study drug, and development of a second primary malignancy. Results: 389 pts were enrolled: VenR (n=194), BR (n=195). At data cutoff (May 8, 2019), all pts were off treatment and with a median follow-up from enrolment of 48 months. With a median follow-up period of 22 months since Ven completion (1-35 months), the PFS benefit of VenR over BR was sustained (HR, 0.19 [95% CI 0.14, 0.25]; p&lt;0.0001; Figure 1). The 4-year PFS estimates were 57.3% (95% CI 49.4, 65.3) versus 4.6% (95% CI, 0.1, 9.2), respectively. For the pts who completed 2 years of Ven (n=130), the 18- and 24-month post-treatment cessation PFS estimates were 75.5% (95% CI 67.4, 83.7) and 68.0% (95% CI 57.6, 78.4), respectively. Thirty-five of 130 pts had developed progressive disease (PD, defined by International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria) after completion of Ven. Sustained overall survival (OS) benefit was demonstrated with VenR over BR (HR, 0.41 [95% CI 0.26, 0.65]; p&lt;0.0001; 4-year rate: 85.3% vs 66.8%; Figure 2). This OS benefit was seen despite 103/142 (73%) BR pts receiving treatment after progression; 81/103 (79%) pts in the BR arm received novel targeted agents (Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors [BTKis; n=60], PI3K inhibitors [PI3Kis; n=9], BH3-only mimetics [n=10] or investigational medicinal products [IMPs; n=2]). The response rate to novel targeted agents in the BR arm was 47/81 (58%; Figure 3). Forty-two of 64 (66%) pts in the VenR arm received anti-CLL therapy after PD. Of these, 28 received novel targeted therapies (BTKis, n=12; PI3Kis, n=1; BH3-only mimetics, n=14; IMPs, n=1) and the response rate to these treatments was 9/28 (32%; Figure 3). Fourteen of the VenR arm pts with PD subsequently received Ven or were re-treated with VenR, producing an overall response rate of 2/14 (14%); 10/14 pts (71%) were without an evaluable or available response. Updated response data for these pts will be presented. In both treatment arms, the previously reported association between uMRD in PB at the EOCT response visit with improved PFS was maintained with this extended follow-up (Figure 4A). In the VenR cohort, improved PFS was observed for pts who were uMRD at end of treatment (EOT; Figure 4B). Among VenR pts who had detectable PB MRD at the EOCT response visit and at EOT, low-MRD pts continued to show improved PFS versus high-MRD pts. There were no new SAEs considered related to study drug. Excluding non-melanoma skin malignancies, 3 second primary malignancies were detected (1 who received BR [melanoma] and 2 who received VenR [melanoma and breast cancer]) since the previous update. There were no new reported events of Richter's transformation. Conclusions: Four-year data from MURANO demonstrate sustained PFS and OS benefits with VenR versus BR. 24-month post-treatment cessation PFS was 68.0% in pts completing 2 years of Ven, and pts who attained PB uMRD showed particularly durable responses. These follow-up data provide further support for the application of time-limited VenR in R/R CLL. Disclosures Seymour: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kipps:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Velos-Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jannsen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Eichhorst:ArQule: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hillmen:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Apellis: Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. D'Rozario:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Assouline:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Owen:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Acerta: Research Funding. Robak:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel grant; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Morphosys AG: Research Funding. de la Serna:Roche, AbbVie, Janssen, Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Roche, AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaeger:Novartis, Roche, Sandoz: Consultancy; AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Takeda Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eisai, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Takeda Millennium, MSD, BMS, Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene, Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, AbbVie, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cartron:Sanofi, Gilead, Janssen, Roche, Celgene: Honoraria; Roche, Celgene: Consultancy. Montillo:Versatem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Lamanna:Celgene: Consultancy; Infinity/ Verastem: Research Funding; Ming: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Oncternal: Research Funding. Kim:AbbVie: Employment, Other: Stock or options. Wu:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Stock options. Jiang:F. Hoffman-La Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Genentech, Inc.: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership. Lefebure:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boyer:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Humphrey:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Kater:Genentech: Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel funding, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Introduction: Despite the curative intent of the R-CHOP regimen in the first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 35-40% of patients who received R-CHOP will eventually succumb to their disease (Coiffier, et al. Blood 2010; Sarkozy and Sehn. Ann Lymphoma 2019). As such, improved treatments are needed. Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells by binding to CD3 on T cells and CD20 on B cells. Mosun monotherapy has a manageable safety profile and promising efficacy, including durable complete responses (CR), in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (Schuster, et al. ASH 2019). This is the first report describing the safety and efficacy of Mosun plus CHOP (M-CHOP) in pts with R/R NHL and newly diagnosed DLBCL in the ongoing GO40515 (NCT03677141) study. Methods: Pts with R/R NHL and with newly diagnosed DLBCL received six 21-day cycles of M-CHOP. In Cycle (C) 1, Mosun was administered in step-up doses on Day (D) 1 (1mg), D8 (2mg), and D15 (13.5mg and 30mg in R/R NHL; 30mg in newly diagnosed DLBCL) to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Full dose Mosun (C1D15 dose) was given on D1 of subsequent cycles in addition to CHOP. Interim and primary response assessments were obtained after C4 and C6, respectively. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was mandatory for all pts. Pts with a partial response or stable disease at the end of C6 could continue Mosun monotherapy for up to 11 additional cycles. Response rates were based on the Lugano criteria (Cheson, et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Results: As of June 3, 2020, 43 pts had received M-CHOP: seven patients with R/R NHL, and 36 pts with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Pts with disease stage II-IV were enrolled, with a median IPI score of 3 (range: 2-4) and ECOG performance status between 0 and 2. Median age was 66 (range: 39-87) and 17 pts (42%) were female. In pts with R/R NHL treated with M-CHOP (n=7), the overall response rate (ORR) was 86%, with 71% of pts achieving a CR. Twenty-seven out of 36 pts with previously untreated DLBCL started treatment at least three months prior to data cut-off date; in these pts the ORR was 96%, with a CR rate of 85% (Table). Grade (Gr) ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 37 pts (86%) and serious AEs in 19 pts (44%). Two pts (29%) with R/R NHL experienced CRS (one with Gr 1 and one with Gr 2; ASTCT grading, Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019); one pt received tocilizumab. Nineteen pts (53%) with previously untreated DLBCL had CRS events (14 with Gr 1, five with Gr2); one pt received tocilizumab. No pts required vasopressors or high-flow oxygen. All CRS events occurred in C1, resolved without sequelae, and did not result in discontinuation or delay in treatment. No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) events were observed. Neutropenia occurred in two pts with R/R NHL (29%; Gr 4 n=2) and 23 pts with newly diagnosed DLBCL (64%; Gr 3 n=3, Gr 4 n=20). Febrile neutropenia occurred in two pts (29%) with R/R NHL, and six pts (17%) with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Gr 5 AEs, excluding disease progression, were reported in two pts: one due to Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in a pt with R/R NHL, and one due to pneumonia in a pt with newly diagnosed DLBCL. All pts with R/R NHL have completed treatment. Among pts with newly diagnosed DLBCL, four have completed treatment and 29 remain on treatment; one pt died on-study (Gr 5 pneumonia), and two withdrew from the study treatment due to AEs (one due to treatment-unrelated esophageal perforation; one due to treatment-related pneumonitis). Linear pharmacokinetics (PK) were observed for Mosun. No differences were seen in Mosun exposure for pts with R/R NHL and previously untreated DLBCL. Similar PK characteristics were seen with M-CHOP as with Mosun monotherapy, indicating no impact when co-administered with CHOP. Conclusions: Preliminary data show that Mosun, a novel CD20/CD3 bispecific antibody, when combined with CHOP confers high response rates and a manageable safety profile in pts with R/R NHL and previously untreated DLBCL. End of treatment response rate data for pts with previously untreated DLBCL, and correlative studies of T-cell response, will be presented. Disclosures Phillips: Incyte: Consultancy, Other: travel expenses; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Cardinal Health: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy. Olszewski:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding. Munoz:Alexion: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Speakers Bureau; Juno/Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Fosunkite: Consultancy; Innovent: Consultancy; Acrotech/Aurobindo: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Kim:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Voronoi: Consultancy; Boryung: Consultancy; AstraZeneca and Korea Health Industry Development Institute: Research Funding. Yoon:Celltrion: Honoraria; Samyang: Research Funding; Amgen, Chongkundang, Celgene, Astrazeneca: Consultancy. Greil:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; MSD Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; BMS/celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; Astra zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding. Westin:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Research Funding; 47: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jaeger:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Infinity: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; True North: Honoraria, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria; CDR Life AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Canales:Celgene, Gilead, iQone, Janssen, Karyopharm, Novartis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Sandoz: Honoraria; Janssen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Sandoz, Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Chen:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bristol-Myer Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Althaus:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. O'Hear:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Negricea:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Xie:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. McCord:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Purev:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vallurupalli:Received Research funding to University of Kansas to conduct the ongoing GO40515 clinical trial for which the abstract is being submitted.: Research Funding; On Kite speaker Bureau but do not receive any honorarium.: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Mosunetuzumab (RG7828; CD20-TDB) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Mosunetuzumab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Mosunetuzumab is an investigational agent.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a devastating hematopoietic malignancy caused by differentiation arrest and suppression of apoptosis of immature myeloid cells. The long-term survival of AML under the established therapies remains poor. Differentiation therapy has been developed to promote the normal process of hematopoietic maturation from self-renewing progenitors to terminally differentiated effector cells. The recent discovery of a novel target, the enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), offers differentiation-promoting therapy for the majority of AML (Sykes, D.B., et al.Cell, 2016). DHODH is the rate-limiting enzyme in the pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway. DHODH inhibition was reported to efficiently relieve the differentiation block caused by HoxA9 overexpression in 70% of AML, making this discovery potentially universally applicable for AML patients with diverse genomic alterations. AG-636 is a novel, potent, selective DHODH inhibitor developed by Agios Pharmaceuticals. This small molecule inhibitor has favorable pharmacokinetic properties and is in dose-finding Phase I clinical trials in lymphoma patients (NCT03834584) and is ready to enter a Phase I study in acute leukemia and myeloid dysplasia syndrome. Here, we investigated single agent activity of AG-636 in pre-clinical AML models. Results: AG-636 inhibited cell proliferation, induced apoptosis in AML cell lines, primary blasts and CD34+ leukemic stem/progenitor cells from AML patients with various genomic alterations cultured under physiologic conditions of stromal support (Fig. 1A). Flow cytometry and multi-parametric mass cytometry (CyTOF) analysis demonstrated that AG-636 reduced bulk AML and facilitated emergence of the differentiated myelo-monocytic cell subset co-expressing CD11b, CD11c and CD14 (Fig. 1B). Both cytotoxic and differentiating effects were rescued by supplementing the DHO downstream metabolite uridine, supporting on-target activity of AG-636 through DHODH inhibition and dependency of AML survival and stemness on the pyrimidine biosynthesis (Fig 1A top). Mass spectrometric analysis of 166 metabolites confirmed that targeting DHODH by AG-636 resulted in accumulation of the upstream L-dihydroorotic acid and ureidosuccinic acid, and depletion of the downstream metabolites, such as uridine 5'-diphsophate, uridine 5'-monophsophate, CDP and dCMP in pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway. Metabolic profiling further demonstrated the depletion of 5'-phosphoribosyl-N-formylglycinamide in treated cells, indicating the sequential effect of AG-636 on purine biosynthesis and metabolism. Seahorse-based metabolic assay showed inhibition of basal oxygen consumption and ATP generation in AG-636-treated cells, suggesting a contribution of DHODH in coupling of the mitochondria function. Proteomic profiling and immunoblots analysis revealed that AG-636 triggered AMPK activation in response to metabolic stress, and upregulated the expression of TP53, PUMA and NOXA known to regulate mitochondrial integrity. A role for DHODH inhibition in impairment of mitochondria function is of note given the key metabolic dependence of AML cells on OXPHOS/mitochondria function as shown by us and others (Molina J.R. et al. Nat Med, 2018). In vivo, twice daily administration of AG-636 significantly extended survival in a xenograft MOLM13-GFP-luciferase mouse model (Fig. 1C). Flow cytometry and CyTOF analysis demonstrated that AG-636 induced differentiation of CD11b+CD14+ and CD11b+CD11c+CD14+ monocytes in the bone marrow of treated mice (Fig. 1D). Administration of AG-636 significantly reduced tumor burden, induced differentiation and delayed leukemia progression in two AML patient-derived xenograft mouse models, one harboring mutations EZH2, NRAS and TET3, the other with mutations in ASXL1, BCOR and U2AF1. Daily treatment of AG-636 was well tolerated in all xenograft AML models tested, with a minimal effect on body weight and no significant toxicity recorded over the course of regimen. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings demonstrate that AG-636 is highly active against ex-vivo stroma-supported AML and AML stem/progenitor cells and in the in vivo AML xenograft models with diverse genetic subtypes. The significant monotherapy efficacy observed in pre-clinical studies provides the strong rationale for a clinical evaluation of AG-636 in myeloid malignancies. Disclosures Kuruvilla: The University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center: Employment. Kantarjian:Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Ariad: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Andreeff:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Patents licensed, royalty bearing, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstaZeneca: Consultancy; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; Reata: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership; Eutropics: Equity Ownership; Senti Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; CPRIT: Research Funding; NIH/NCI: Research Funding; Center for Drug Research & Development: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-CTEP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; German Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Cliln Network): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CLL Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BiolineRx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. DiNardo:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; daiichi sankyo: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; medimmune: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; notable labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Murtie:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Ulanet:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Konopleva:Calithera: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Ablynx: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding.

Introduction: Selinexor is a first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) that blocks XPO1, forcing the nuclear retention and re-activation of tumor suppressor proteins including p53, p73, FOXO, IkB and Rb. The phase 2b SADAL study included 134 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL with single agent oral selinexor twice weekly. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29.1%, median duration of response (DOR) was 9.3 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 9 months. Based on these data, selinexor was recently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL, de novo or transformed from follicular lymphoma. Patients with DLBCL tend to have a number of comorbidities, including poor renal function, which can require a reduction in the dose of intensive chemotherapy as well as lenalidomide, leading to inferior outcomes. Selinexor is not metabolized nor cleared by the kidneys and has been demonstrated to be safe and active in patients with myeloma and renal dysfunction. We performed post-hoc analyses of the SADAL study to determine the efficacy and safety among patients stratified by renal function at baseline. Methods: The SADAL study is multi-center, open-label Phase 2b study that enrolled patients with DLBCL previously treated with 2-5 lines of therapy. Patients may have progressed post-stem cell therapy (SCT) or were not candidates for SCT. In this study, 60 mg of selinexor was administered twice weekly until disease progression. The primary endpoint was ORR, and other endpoints included DOR, OS, and safety assessments. For the current analysis, outcomes were assessed according to baseline renal function as estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance (CrCl). Groups included those with reduced (CrCl ≤60 mL/min) and normal (CrCl &gt;60 mL/min) renal function. Results: Of 134 patients, 37 (28%) had a reduced baseline CrCl (≤60 mL/min) while 97 (72%) had CrCl &gt;60 mL/min. The median age of patients with reduced CrCl was 74 years with 70% ≥70 years, while the median for those with normal CrCl was 65 years, with 35% ≥70 years. De novo and transformed DLBCL showed similar renal function levels: 78% and 22% with reduced CrCl and 76% and 24% with normal CrCl. Of patients with reduced CrCl, the DLBCL subtype was 41% GCB and 57% non-GCB compared to 50% and 46% in patients with normal CrCl. The group of patients with reduced CrCl had baseline ECOG performance status of 2 in 16% vs 11% in those with normal CrCl. Treatment with selinexor demonstrated a similar ORR in patients with a baseline reduced CrCl (29.7%) versus normal CrCl (28.9%). A complete response (CR) was observed in 8 (21.6%) patients with reduced and 10 (10.3%) patients with normal CrCl. The median duration of response (DOR) in patients who had reduced CrCl was 23.0 months compared to 9.2 months in patients with normal CrCl. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.7, 24.8) and 2.3 months (95% CI 1.9, 3.7) and overall survival was 7.8 months and 9.1 months in patients with reduced CrCl and those with normal CrCl. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs for patients with reduced versus normal CrCl were thrombocytopenia (45.9% vs. 38.1%), nausea (5.4% vs. 6.2%), and fatigue (8.1% vs. 11.3%). There was no clinically significant increase in treatment-related serious adverse events (21.6% vs. 20.6%) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (10.8% vs. 7.2%) in patients with reduced or normal CrCl, respectively. Conclusions: Selinexor showed similar anti-DLBCL activity and tolerability in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL with a reduced renal function (CrCl &lt;60 mL/min) compared to those with normal (CrCl ≥60 mL/min) renal function. No dose adjustments are required in patients with renal dysfunction and DLBCL who are treated with selinexor. Disclosures Schuster: Amgen, Abbvie, Gilead, Takeda, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Astellas, Verastem, Merck, Novartis, Takeda, Genentech,, Seattle Genetics: Other: Personal Fees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Canales:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; iQone: Honoraria; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria. Westin:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; 47: Research Funding. Zijlstra:Roche: Research Funding. Follows:Karyopharm, Roche, Abbvie, Astrazeneca, Janssen, BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Karmali:Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Honoraria; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene/Juno: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kalakonda:Gilead, Janssen, Karyopharm: Honoraria; Verastem, Gilead, Celgene, Roche: Research Funding. Goy:AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; MD Anderson: Research Funding; Xcenda: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Regional Cancer Care Associates/OMI: Current Employment; Bayer: Research Funding; PracticeUpdate Oncology: Consultancy; RCCA/OMI: Current Employment; Morphosys: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; CALBG: Research Funding; Infinity Verastem: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; COTA: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: leadership role; Hackensack UMC and University of Nebraska: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding. Casasnovas:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Thieblemont:Cellectis: Speakers Bureau; Roche, Amgen, Kyte Gilead, Celgene, Abbvie, Novartis, Cellectis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Roche, Hospita: Research Funding. Cavallo:Takeda, Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Other: Speaker Fee. Hill:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Tilly:BMS: Honoraria. Jaeger:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria; CDR Life AG: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gurion:JC Health CARE: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medison: Consultancy, Honoraria. Caimi:Celgene Corp: Other: Incyte Corporation - Ownership - Pharmacyclics, Inc. - Ownership - Celgene Corp. - Other, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Martin:Kite: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; I-MAB: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teneobio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy. Davies:Roche, Acerta Pharma, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, ADC Therapeutics, Gilead: Research Funding; Roche, Celgene, Kite Pharma, Acerta, Karyopharma, Regeneron, Incyte: Consultancy; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Celegene, Roche, Kite Pharma, Celegene: Honoraria. Smith:TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; FortySeven: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support, Research Funding. Collins:BeiGene: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Taekda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celleron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses , Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding. Salles:Epizyme: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Debiopharm: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Autolus: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other. Ma:Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Corona:Karyopharm: Current Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm: Current Employment. Joshi:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy. Chamoun:Karyopharm: Current Employment. Wang:Curis: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Karyopharm: Current Employment. Shah:Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shacham:Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: (8999996, 9079865, 9714226, PCT/US12/048319, and I574957) on hydrazide containing nuclear transport modulators and uses, and pending patents PCT/US12/048319, 499/2012, PI20102724, and 2012000928) . Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects approximately 100,000 people in the United States (US) today. SCD can lead to painful vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), damage to major organs, increased vulnerability to severe infections, and as such, affects a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The objective of this study was to quantify how disease severity and the presence of VOCs affects patient quality of life, as measured by the economic metric of patient utilities. While previous studies (Anie et al. 2012) have measured utilities among patients with SCD in the United Kingdom (UK), this is the first US study to evaluate utilities in patients with SCD during and outside the experience of a VOC. Methods: This study was a non-interventional, cross-sectional, online survey of patients with SCD. Individuals were recruited through SCD patient advocacy groups and a market research group. In this analysis, the outcome of interest was health utility values derived from the EuroQoL Five Dimension 5 level (EQ-5D) scale. Utility is a continuous measure of health status, where a utility of 1 represents perfect health, and a utility of 0 represents death. The EQ-5D survey responses were converted to EQ-5D health utilities using the United States EuroQoL value set, and EQ-5D health utility values (mean and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were estimated. Respondents completed the EQ-5D question twice: once in reference to their health status when they were not experiencing a VOC and once in reference to their health status when experiencing a VOC. We estimated EQ-5D for both these measures. For EQ-5D not during VOC we estimated EQ-5D stratified by three classes of disease severity. These classes were informed by clinical expert severity. Respondents were classified as Severity Class I if they had no history of VOC requiring treatment by health care providers in the past year; Class II if they had ≥1 emergency department (ED) visit or hospital admission in the past year without organ damage; and Class III if they had long term organ damage (such as stroke or renal disease). Results: 326 individuals were screened and 299 individuals were included in the final analytic sample. Among these individuals, the average age was 34.3 years (range 18 - 72); 219 (73.2%) were female and 1 (0.3%) was non-binary. Based on self-report of VOC, as well as presence of complications and organ damage of individuals, 79.6% (238/299) were Severity Class III, 12.0% (36/299) were Class II, and 8.4% (25/299) Class I. The estimated health utility value derived from EQ-5D during VOC was 0.311 (95% CI: 0.286, 0.337). The estimated health utility values not during a VOC derived from EQ-5D was 0.733 (0.713, 0.753) for Severity Class III and 0.775 (0.725, 0.826) for Severity Class II. This result suggests >5% worse health status utility in Class III than Class II disease severity, although a Wald t-test for difference in means did not suggest evidence of a statistically significant difference in utility (p-value 0.13). Conclusion: The presence of VOC had a more severe impact on HRQoL for patients with SCD than previously estimated. When not experiencing a crisis, patients with Severity Class III, indicated by presence of organ damage, had >5% worse HRQoL than those with Severity Class II. Disclosures Thom: Novartis Pharma AG: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy; Bayer AG: Consultancy. Shafrin:Precision Health Economics, part of Precision Medicine Group: Employment, Equity Ownership. Keeney:Novartis Pharma AG: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Zhao:Precision Health Economics, part of Precision Medicine Group: Employment. Joseph:Cigna: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bhor:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rizio:Optum: Employment. Bronté-Hall:bluebird bio: Research Funding. Shah:GBT: Research Funding; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.