Relevant bibliographies by topics / Historical Archaeology / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Historical Archaeology'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Historical Archaeology.
Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Historical Archaeology.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Wayman, E. R. "Historical Archaeology." Current Anthropology 47, no. 2 (April 2006): 215–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/503065.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Crossley, David. "Historical archaeology." Antiquity 74, no. 283 (March 2000): 236–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00066448.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lightfoot, Kent G. "Culture Contact Studies: Redefining the Relationship between Prehistoric and Historical Archaeology." American Antiquity 60, no. 2 (April 1995): 199–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/282137.

Full text
Abstract:
Archaeology is poised to play a pivotal role in the reconfiguration of historical anthropology. Archaeology provides not only a temporal baseline that spans both prehistory and history, but the means to study the material remains of ethnic laborers in pluralistic colonial communities who are poorly represented in written accounts. Taken together, archaeology is ideally suited for examining the multicultural roots of modern América. But before archaeology’s full potential to contribute to culture contact studies can be realized, we must address several systemic problems resulting from the separation of “prehistoric” and “historical” archaeology into distinct subfields. In this paper, I examine the implications of increasing temporal/regional specialization in archaeology on (1) the use of historical documents in archaeological research, (2) the study of long-term culture change, and (3) the implementation of pan-regional comparative analyses.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Klejn, Leo S. "To separate a centaur: on the relationship of archaeology and history in Soviet tradition." Antiquity 67, no. 255 (June 1993): 339–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00045397.

Full text
Abstract:
The relationship between archaeology and history is not just an abstract theoretical question: it is one which determines the practical organization of archaeological activity and the publication of its results. It is a general problem of archaeology in Europe, where the subject has had to differentiate itself from the historical study of a long series of literate cultures; and it is especially acute in the former Soviet bloc, where a Marxist orthodoxy of historical science formerly prevailed. Leo Klejn is Russaian archaeology's most distinguished theoretician. Here he discusses in his own words both the academic sociology of the historical sciences and the role which he sees for archaeology within them.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

GILBERT, ALLAN S. "Historical Archaeology:Historical Archaeology." American Anthropologist 109, no. 2 (June 2007): 384–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.384.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Cleland, Charles E. "Historical archaeology adrift?" Historical Archaeology 35, no. 2 (June 2001): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03374375.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kariyev, Ye M., and D. B. Samratova. "О статусе археологии как исторической науки (ключевые аспекты в мультидисциплинарном контексте)." BULLETIN of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical sciences. Philosophy. Religion Series 139, no. 2 (2022): 51–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2022-139-2-51-75.

Full text
Abstract:
As we know, archaeology has transitioned quite a long and thorny path to an academic discipline with its source base, methodology, method, and other inherent attributes of a full-fledged scientific unit. With the intensification of the development of any humanitarian science and not only science, the processes, and trends of the need to revise its paradigm and fundamental provisions – goals, objectives, subject, object, and other basic justification are natural. Archaeology is no exception – now, in the academic environment of the archaeological world, the question of revising the place of archaeology in the science system is increasingly being raised, or at least determining an archaeology clear stance in the circle of historical science, up to its separation into an independent unit. In this regard, the aspect of the perception and interpretation of archaeology by the mother science now – history - is also of no small importance. In the article presented to attention, an attempt is made to analyze the key points of a possible paradigm shift and an attempt is made to determine the relationship of historical science to archaeology in the context of assessing its separation probability. The main difference in the treatment of the latter aspect is that, in addition to archaeologists' scientific opinions, representatives' views of historical science themselves are considered, including from the standpoint of possible rejection of archeology on its part due to potential disagreements in the above-mentioned cornerstone scientific aspects. The authors present their own perspective on archaeology's place within the historical disciplines, concluding, among other things, that it is necessary to develop theoretical and methodological developments that consider regional and other characteristics of a particular geographical area, country, etc.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Leone, Mark P., Douglas V. Armstrong, Yvonne Marshall, and Adam T. Smith. "The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Captial: Excavations in Annapolis." Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18, no. 1 (February 2008): 101–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0959774308000115.

Full text
Abstract:
Over the last two decades, there has been increasing attention to community archaeology, an archaeology which acknowledges the impact of archaeological research upon the communities among which it is conducted. Doing fieldwork has tangible effects upon the people we work among: archaeologists provide employment, spend money locally, negotiate local power structures, provide exotic connections, and, not least, change the landscape of knowledge by helping local people understand more or different things about their ancestors and about their own historical identity. While this is true worldwide, within American Historical Archaeology this strand of research has converged with a tradition of sophisticated materialist analysis highlighting not only class domination but also resistance and the persistence of alternative practices, ideologies and identities. A key element of this archaeology is public participation in the process of revealing a past of domination, struggle and resistance. The result is an archaeology which aspires not only to revise traditionally endorsed accounts of American history, but also to be an activist archaeology.Mark Leone began this line of activist, participatory historical archaeology many years ago in Annapolis, and many of the scholars currently contributing to this body of work have been trained or inspired by this project. In The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital, Leone summarizes twenty-five years of research at Annapolis.The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis has received the Society for Historical Archaeology's James Deetz Book Award for 2008.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Schuyler, Robert L. "History of Historical Archaeology." Bulletin of the History of Archaeology 8, no. 2 (November 20, 1998): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bha.08203.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

TSUNEKI, Akira. "Historical Cognition and Archaeology." TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES 16, no. 10 (2011): 52–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5363/tits.16.10_52.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Barnes, Mark R. "Book Reviews: Historical Archaeology." North American Archaeologist 30, no. 3 (July 2009): 313–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/na.30.3.d.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Leech, Roger H. "Issues for Historical Archaeology." Antiquity 75, no. 290 (December 2001): 891–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00089481.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Jamieson, Ross W. "Historical Archaeology and Environment." Historical Archaeology 53, no. 2 (March 25, 2019): 449–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41636-019-00175-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Romero, Facundo Gomez. "Philosophy and historical archaeology." Journal of Social Archaeology 2, no. 3 (October 2002): 402–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146960530200200306.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Cotter, John L. "Historical Archaeology Before 1967." Historical Archaeology 27, no. 1 (March 1993): 4–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03373550.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Greenwood, Roberta S. "Historical archaeology in California." Historical Archaeology 25, no. 3 (September 1991): 24–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03374147.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Mrozowski, Stephen A. "Historical archaeology as anthropology." Historical Archaeology 22, no. 1 (January 1988): 18–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03374496.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Labadi, Sophia. "Industrial Archaeology as Historical Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology." Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 12 (November 15, 2001): 77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pia.162.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Orser, Charles E. "Historical Archaeology as Modern-World Archaeology in Argentina." International Journal of Historical Archaeology 12, no. 3 (March 4, 2008): 181–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10761-008-0052-z.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Knapp, Bettina L. "Archaeology of the Soul? Historical and Literary Archaeology?" Symposium: A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures 51, no. 4 (January 1998): 218–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397709809599924.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Schmidt, Peter R., and Jonathan R. Walz. "Re-Representing African Pasts through Historical Archaeology." American Antiquity 72, no. 1 (January 2007): 53–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40035298.

Full text
Abstract:
Historical archaeology in Africa has long privileged issues framed in terms of European sources and the impact of imperialism and colonialism on African peoples. With its emphasis on modernity, historical archaeology of this persuasion overlooks historical archaeologies concerned with revising metanarratives that misrepresent African pasts. We argue that historical archaeologists need to listen to local histories, often held in oral form, and that the appropriate task of historical archaeology is making histories that include, not exclude, local historicities. A critical historical archaeology in Africa is illustrated by cases in which oral traditions play a central role in unveiling the historical significance of archaeological remains as well as circumstances in which careful readings of archaeology and local histories subvert standard histories based on outsiders' interpretations and observations. We draw case studies from the Swahili Coast, Great Zimbabwe, the Kalahari, and the Cwezi period of the Great Lakes. Our approach accepts that if archaeologists employ materiality—regardless of its chronological age—to transform historical representation, then such historical revision creates a more comprehensive practice for historical archaeology, a matter of vital interest for both history and anthropology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Hammond, Norman, and Lisa Falk. "Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective." Journal of Interdisciplinary History 23, no. 2 (1992): 386. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/205322.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Linebaugh, Donald W., Paul A. Shackel, and Barbara J. Little. "Historical Archaeology of the Chesapeake." Journal of Southern History 62, no. 1 (February 1996): 185. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2211273.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Bell, Edward L., Paul A. Shackel, and Barbara J. Little. "Historical Archaeology of the Chesapeake." Journal of American History 82, no. 4 (March 1996): 1671. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2945454.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Johnson, Matthew, and Lisa Falk. "Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective." Man 27, no. 3 (September 1992): 647. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2803938.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Wurst, LouAnn. "Toward a Collective Historical Archaeology." Reviews in Anthropology 44, no. 2 (April 3, 2015): 118–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2015.1029833.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Hicks, Dan. "Historical Archaeology and the British." Cambridge Archaeological Journal 14, no. 1 (April 2004): 101–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0959774304000071.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Johnson, Matthew. "Towards a world historical archaeology." Antiquity 71, no. 271 (March 1997): 220–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x0008474x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Dalglish, Chris, and Stephen T. Driscoll. "An International Scottish Historical Archaeology?" International Journal of Historical Archaeology 14, no. 3 (April 29, 2010): 309–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10761-010-0112-z.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Nuevo Delaunay, Amalia, and Alistair Paterson. "Introduction: Southern Deserts Historical Archaeology." International Journal of Historical Archaeology 21, no. 2 (March 11, 2017): 277–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10761-017-0410-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Miksic, John N. "Historical Archaeology in Southeast Asia." Historical Archaeology 51, no. 4 (September 27, 2017): 471–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41636-017-0056-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Subodh, Sanjay. "Medieval Archaeology and Historical Reconstruction." Indian Historical Review 42, no. 1 (June 2015): 44–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0376983615569836.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

LEONE, MARK P. "A Historical Archaeology of Capitalism." American Anthropologist 97, no. 2 (June 1995): 251–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1995.97.2.02a00050.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Wurst, LouAnn. "Internalizing class in historical archaeology." Historical Archaeology 33, no. 1 (March 1999): 7–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03374277.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Hardesty, Donald L. "Comments on “historical archaeology adrift”." Historical Archaeology 35, no. 2 (June 2001): 23–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03374379.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Moore, Sue Mullins, Paul A. Shackel, and Barbara J. Little. "Historical Archaeology of the Chesapeake." William and Mary Quarterly 52, no. 3 (July 1995): 550. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2947319.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Lawrence, Susan, and Grace Karskens. "Historical Archaeology in the Antipodes." Historical Archaeology 37, no. 1 (March 2003): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03376588.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Funari, Pedro Paulo A. "Historical Archaeology and Global Justice." Historical Archaeology 43, no. 4 (December 2009): 120–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03376773.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Baram, Uzi, and Daniel Hughes. "Florida and Its Historical Archaeology." Historical Archaeology 46, no. 1 (March 2012): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03376856.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Orser, Charles E. "Twenty-First-Century Historical Archaeology." Journal of Archaeological Research 18, no. 2 (December 24, 2009): 111–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10814-009-9035-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Dommasnes, Liv Helga, and Sandra Montón-Subías. "European Gender Archaeologies in Historical Perspective." European Journal of Archaeology 15, no. 3 (2012): 367–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1461957112y.0000000016.

Full text
Abstract:
This study presents an overview of the development of gender archaeologies in local academies across Europe, from the initial efforts in Norway in the early 1970s, to the founding of the multinational Archaeology and Gender in Europe (AGE) working group in 2009. In addition, the study seeks to show the scope of gender archaeology once contributions from different traditions in different languages are included, and to provide comparative historiographies for those European countries where gender archaeology is now a major strand of research. We hope that innovative approaches to the study of gender in the past will emerge in the future thanks to fruitful encounters between regional trends and developments.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Herschend, Frands. "Historical or Textual Archaeology - An Archaeology of Critical Rereading." Current Swedish Archaeology 5, no. 1 (June 10, 2021): 65–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.37718/csa.1997.05.

Full text
Abstract:
Based on a discussion of the relationship between history and archaeology, the author proposes a critical analysis of both written and material sources. All sources are considered textual and should be analysed (reread) on three levels: the conceptual, the intentional and the structural. In an example - an analysis of the meaning of the concept ’land'- the value of the analysis is shown to be the formation of a discursive and meaningful concept in an evolutionary and additive production of knowledge. Rereading ought to be the methodological approach of textual archaeology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Predovnik, Katarina. "Historical archaeology at the interstices between archaeology and history." Ars & Humanitas 17, no. 2 (December 21, 2023): 91–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/ars.17.2.91-106.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper explores the relationship between the disciplines of archaeology and history through the lens of historical archaeology. This is not a unified subdiscipline and has indeed been defined in various ways. Here, the term will be used as a shorthand for (later) medieval, post-medieval and contemporary archaeologies. Historical archaeology is first and foremost archaeology focusing on material remains and producing knowledge claims about the past (history) from things. But it can complement and confront the data gleaned from the material sources with other types of evidence (textual, pictorial, oral), so it is an archaeology with texts. This represents a methodological and epistemological challenge. An uncritical reliance on textual information over the material has often been warned against as “the tyranny of the historical record”. Many (historical) archaeologists have been inspired by various historiographical concepts and approaches, such as cultural history, the Annales school of social and economic history, Braudel’s concept of the longue-durée, the history of the everyday (Alltagsgeschichte), and microhistory. Conversely, the knowledge produced by archaeologists tends to be disregarded by most historians. This is unfortunate, as the material evidence offers important insights into past lifeworlds and should not be ignored.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Brusius, Mirjam. "Hitting two birds with one stone: An afterword on archeology and the history of science." History of Science 55, no. 3 (September 2017): 383–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0073275317727975.

Full text
Abstract:
This afterword comments on the articles gathered together in this special section of History of Science (“Disassembling Archaeology, Reassembling the Modern World”). Criticizing the consistent lack of institutional infrastructure for histories of archaeology in the history of science, the piece argues that scholars should recognize the commonality of archaeology’s practices with those of the nineteenth and twentieth century field sciences that have received more historical attention. The piece also suggests avenues to help take this approach further, such as combining expertise from historians of the biological sciences and of antiquarianism and archaeology to look at the history of the understanding of human variation and race. Finally, the afterword suggests that scholars should reconsider the idea of archaeology’s reliance on institutionalised practices, thinking about the use and re-use of material culture in more diverse and pragmatic social contexts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Trigger, Bruce G. "‘The loss of innocence’ in historical perspective." Antiquity 72, no. 277 (September 1998): 694–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00087135.

Full text
Abstract:
The dual tasks of this paper are to examine David Clarke’s ideas about the development of archaeology as they relate both to the era when ‘the loss of innocence’ was written and to what has happened since. In his treatment of the history of archaeology offered in that essay, Clarke subscribed to at least two of the key tenets of the behaviourist and utilitarian approaches that dominated the social sciences in the 1960s: neoevolutionism and ecological determinism.Clarke viewed the development of archaeology as following a unilinear sequence of stages from consciousness through self-consciousness to critical self-consciousness. The first stage began with archaeology defining its subject matter and what archaeologists do. As its database and the procedures required for studying it became more elaborate, self-conscious archaeology emerged as a ‘series of divergent and selfreferencing regional schools … with regionally esteemed bodies of archaeological theory and locally preferred forms of description, interpretation and explanation’ (Clarke 1973: 7). At the stage of critical self-consciousness, regionalism was replaced by a conviction that ‘archaeologists hold most of their problems in common and share large areas of general theory within a single discipline’ (1973: 7). Archaeology was now defined by ‘the characteristic forms of its reasoning, the intrinsic nature of its knowledge and information, and its competing theories of concepts and their relationships’ (1973: 7). Clarke looked forward to a fourth (and ultimate?) phase of self-critical self-consciousncss, when the new archaeology would monitor and control its own development.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Caraher, William. "Slow Archaeology, Punk Archaeology, and the ‘Archaeology of Care’." European Journal of Archaeology 22, no. 3 (April 5, 2019): 372–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2019.15.

Full text
Abstract:
This article considers the impact of both historical and digital transhuman practices in archaeology with an eye towards recent conversations concerning punk archaeology, slow archaeology, and an ‘archaeology of care’. Drawing on Ivan Illich, Jacques Ellul, and Gilles Deleuze, the article suggests that current trends in digital practices risk alienating archaeological labour and de-territorializing archaeological work.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Marila, Marko. "Slow science for fast archaeology." Current Swedish Archaeology 27, no. 27 (December 30, 2019): 93–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.37718/csa.2019.05.

Full text
Abstract:
This contribution contends that, with the recent genetic revolution, archaeology has reached a new scientism, a development that could lead to fewer opportunities in the epistemology of archaeology to think difference. Drawing from discussions in slow science and the related idea that scientific importance is a matter of concern rather than fact, the contribution proposes that archaeologists start to cultivate methods of deceleration. In particular, as a measure to mitigate the epistemological effects of archaeology’s methodological acceleration, the contribution suggests the publishing of personal hunches, failed hypotheses, and so forth in addition to research results, and a cultivation of historical awareness in order to better anticipate possible epistemological effects of pursuing conflicting research interests.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Harlan, Mark E. "The Public Benefits of Historical Archaeology: The Forty-first Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology." Heritage Management 1, no. 1 (April 2008): 113–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/hma.2008.1.1.113.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Harlan, Mark. "The Public Benefits of Historical Archaeology: The Forty-first Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology." Heritage & Society 1, no. 1 (April 2008): 113–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/hso.2008.1.1.113.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

DEMJÉN, Andrea, and Florin GOGÂLTAN. "Contumatz Pricske. A study of Historical Archaeology." Supplement 27, no. 3 (2022): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saa-2021-27-3-1.

Full text
Abstract:
This article presents some theoretical aspects related to historical archaeology and mountain landscape archaeology research domains. There were noted various research projects from Transylvania that involved archaeological discoveries found at altitudes above 800 m. Regarding historical archaeology in Romania, the concept and methodology of approaching the recent past, is a field of research that includes only a few recent projects. That is why the Contumaz Pricske project was synthetically presented, for researching a quarantine that operated between 1732-1808 in eastern Transylvania, on the border between the Habsburg Empire and Moldova. This research involved the exploitation of documentary sources from various archives, the use of cartographic sources and conducting archaeological excavations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Historical Archaeology' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography