Academic literature on the topic 'Habermas' theory'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Habermas' theory.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Habermas' theory"

1

Diez, Thomas, and Jill Steans. "A useful dialogue? Habermas and International Relations." Review of International Studies 31, no. 1 (January 2005): 127–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210505006339.

Full text
Abstract:
It is now more than twenty years since Jürgen Habermas's work was first referred to in International Relations (IR) theory. Along with many other continental philosophers and social theorists, Habermas was initially mobilised in the critique of positivism, and in particular neorealism, in IR theory. As such, the interest in Habermas and IR must be located in the first instance within the context of the fourth debate. This Forum section of the Review provides us with the opportunity to take stock and ask whether the dialogue between Habermas and IR has, thus far, been useful in providing new conceptual and methodological tools to analyse international politics and in inspiring new research agendas in IR. We also ask whether the role that dialogue plays within Habermas's work has been useful in formulating a critical theory of international relations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rochberg-Halton, Eugene. "Jürgen Habermas's Theory of Communicative Etherealization:The Theory of Cornmunicative Action, Jiirgen Habermas." Symbolic Interaction 12, no. 2 (November 1989): 333–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1989.12.2.333.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Olafson, Frederick A. "Habermas as a PhilosopherThe Theory of Communicative Action.Jurgen Habermas." Ethics 100, no. 3 (April 1990): 641–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/293215.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bennett, Michael. "Answering the Bioethicists’ Objection." Symposium 24, no. 1 (2020): 92–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/symposium20202415.

Full text
Abstract:
Bioethicists criticize Jürgen Habermas’s argument against “liberal eugenics” for many reasons. This essay examines one particular critique, according to which Habermas misunderstands the implications of human evolution. In adopting Hannah Arendt’s concept of “natality,” Habermas seems to fear that genetically modified children will lose the contingency of their births, which would impair their capacity for political action; but according to evolutionary theory, bioethicists argue, this fear is unfounded. I explore this objection by entertaining the hypothesis that Habermas’s argument assumes Arendt’s interpretation of Darwinian evolution in addition to her conception of natality, and then I answer it by contrasting the conceptions of evolution held by Habermas, by Arendt, and by Habermas’s critics. Les bioéthiciens critiquent l’argument de Jürgen Habermas contre « l’eugénisme libéral » pour de nombreuses raisons. Cet essai examine une critique en particulier, selon laquelle Habermas comprend mal les implications de l’évolution humaine : en adoptant le concept de la « natalité » de Hannah Arendt, Habermas semble craindre que les enfants soumis à une modification génétique ne perdent la contingence propre à leur naissance, une perte qui diminuerait leur capacité pour l’action politique, mais selon la théorie de l’évolution, les bioéthiciens soutiennent que cette peur est sans fondement. J’explore cette objection à Habermas en considérant l’hypothèse que, en plus du concept de la natalité, Habermas suppose aussi l’interprétation arendtienne de l’évolution biologique de Darwin, et j’y répond en confrontant cette conception de l’évolution avec la conception propre à Habermas et avec celle des bioéthiciens qui lui ont répondu.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Couture, Tony. "Feminist Criticisms of Habermas's Ethics and Politics." Dialogue 34, no. 2 (1995): 259–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0012217300014700.

Full text
Abstract:
My project is to assess recent objections directed at Jürgen Habermas by Nancy Fraser, Iris Young and Seyla Benhabib. This dispute is significant because it concerns the value of the Enlightenment style, detached criticism promoted by Habermas as compared to new proposals about dissent from a stance connected to social movements. I argue that these feminist criticisms of Habermas's critical theory are compelling and that they require substantial changes in Habermas's thinking.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

SPECTER, MATTHEW. "HABERMAS'S POLITICAL THOUGHT, 1984–1996: A HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION." Modern Intellectual History 6, no. 1 (April 2009): 91–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479244308001959.

Full text
Abstract:
Jürgen Habermas (b. 1929) has for decades been recognized as a leading European philosopher and public intellectual. But his global visibility has obscured his rootedness in German political culture and debate. The most successful historical accounts of the transformation of political culture in West Germany have turned on the concept of German statism and its decline. Viewing Habermas through this lens, I treat Habermas as a radical critic of German statism and an innovative theorist of democratic constitutionalism. Based on personal interviews with Habermas and his German colleagues, and by setting the major work alongside his occasion-specific political writings from 1984 to 1996, I interpret Habermas's political thought as an evolving response to two distinct moments in German history: first, the mid-1980s, and second, the revolutions of 1989 and German reunification in 1990. This essay challenges the dominant interpretations of Habermas's mature statement of his political theory. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Democracy (1992), which have described it as marking a distinct break with, and reversal of, the commitments of his earlier work. By contrast, I describe the work as an intellectual summa, consistent with Habermas's previous thought and career, and containing remarkable historical interpretations of two intertwined phenomena: the intellectual and institutional dimensions of the Bonn Republic and Habermas's own biography.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Siqueira, Daniel Valente Pedroso de. "Crises sistêmicas e racionalização social como reificação: uma reconstrução da teoria social marxiana." Trilhas Filosóficas 11, no. 3 (April 17, 2019): 53–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.25244/tf.v11i3.3400.

Full text
Abstract:
Resumo: Como entender o desenvolvimento teórico e as mudanças históricosociais que impulsionaram a recuperação e alteração da teoria marxiana no século XX e como esta ainda se encontra atuante sobre nosso horizonte social contemporâneo? Fazendo uso da reconstrução crítica de Habermas, a recuperação se inicia com Weber, a passagem por Lukács e na recepção horkheimeriana-adorniana, que tanto influenciou a crítica social do século XX, o presente artigo busca apresentar uma possibilidade de leitura. Palavras-chave: Teoria crítica. Reificação. Marx. Habermas. Modernidade. Abstract: How can we understand the theoretical development and all the socialhistorical changes which drove the incoming recovery and the further alteration of the Marxian theory in the twentieth century and how is it still possible to assumes it on our contemporary societies? Recovering Habermas’s critical reconstruction, which starts with Weber, the next step over Lukács, and the Horkheimerian-Adornian theoretical reception, which has largely influenced twentieth social critic, the aim paper intents to show up a possible reading. Keywords: Critical theory. Reification. Marx. Habermas. Modernity. REFERÊNCIAS ARAUTO, A. “Lukács’ Theory of Reification”. In: Telos, n. 11, 1972. ARGÜELLO, K. O Ícaro da Modernidade: Direito e Política em Max Weber. São Paulo: Acadêmica, 1997. BERNSTEIN, R. J. Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1991. BRAATEN, J. Habermas’s Critical Theory of Society. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991. COUTINHO, C. N. Lukács: A Ontologia e a Política. In: ANTUNES, R. & RÊGO, W. L. (orgs.). Lukács: Um Galileu no Século XX. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 1996. GIDDENS, A. “Reason without Revolution? Habermas’s Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns”. In :BERNSTEIN, R. J. Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, Massaschusetts : The MIT Press, 1991. HABERMAS, J. “Does Philosophy still have a Purpose?”. In: HABERMAS, J. Philosophical-Political Profiles. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1983. HABERMAS, J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984. HABERMAS, J. Técnica e Ciência como “Ideologia”. São Paulo: Unesp, 2014. HONNETH, A. The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1997. HORKHEIMER, M. Eclipse da Razão. São Paulo: Centauro Editora, 2002. HORKHEIMER, M. Teoria Tradicional e Teoria Crítica. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1975. HORKHEIMER, M.; ADORNO, T. W. Dialética do Esclarecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor, 2006. LEO MAAR, W. “A Reificação como Realidade Social: Práxis, Trabalho e Crítica Imanente em HCC”. In: ANTUNES, R. & RÊGO, W. L. (orgs). Lukács: Um Galileu no século XX. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 1996. LUKÁCS, G. História e Consciência de Classe: Estudos sobre a Dialética Marxista. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2016.MARX, K. A Ideologia Alemã. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2007. MARX, K. Grundrisse: Manuscritos Econômicos de 1857-1858 & Esboços da Crítica da Economia Política. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2011. MELO, R. Marx e Habermas: Teoria Crítica e os Sentidos de Emancipação. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva, 2013. MENEZES, A. B. N. T. Habermas e a Modernidade: Uma “Metacrítica da Razão Instrumental”. Natal: EDUFRN, 2009. NETTO, J. P. “Lukács e o Marxismo Ocidental”. In: ANTUNES, R. & RÊGO, W. L. (orgs.). Lukács: Um Galileu no Século XX. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 1996. NOBRE, M. A Dialética Negativa de Theodor W. Adorno: A Ontologia do Estado Falso. São Paulo: Iluminuras/FAPESP, 1998. NOBRE, M. A Teoria Crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editor, 2004. PINZANI, A. Habermas: Introdução. São Paulo: Artmed, 2004. REPA, L. A Transformação da Filosofia em Jürgen Habermas: Os Papéis de Reconstrução, Interpretação e Crítica. São Paulo: Editora Singular, 2008. TEIXEIRA, M. Razão e Reificação: Um Estudo sobre Max Weber em “História e Consciência de Classe” de Georg Lukács. Campinas: Unicamp, Dissertação de mestrado, in mimeo, 2010. WELLMER, A. “Reason, Utopia, and the Dialectic of Enlightenment”. In: BERNSTEIN, R. J. Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1991.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Scrivener, Michael. "Habermas, Romanticism, and Literary Theory." Literature Compass 1, no. 1 (January 2004): **. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2004.00127.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Edwards, Gemma. "Habermas and Social Movement Theory." Sociology Compass 3, no. 3 (May 2009): 381–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00207.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

walker, brian. "habermas and pluralist political theory." Philosophy & Social Criticism 18, no. 1 (January 1992): 81–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019145379201800105.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Habermas' theory"

1

Sotomayor, Enrique. "Habermas against Hyperrationalism." Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2014. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/119253.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper presents a revision of the way in which Jürgen Habermas returns to the critical tradition of Marxism regarding the topic of ideology. After the characterization of Habermasian thinking regarding the progress of instrumental rationality (at the expense of communicative reason) it confronts the debate between Habermas and Niklas Luhmann within German Social Theory. Finally, the third section focuses on showing the differences regarding the conception of the place of law in society, based on the theoretical frameworks of Habermas and Luhmann.
El presente trabajo plantea una revisión de la forma en que Jürgen Habermas retoma la tradición crítica del marxismo respecto del tópico de la ideología. Luego y a partir de la caracterización del pensamiento de Habermas respecto del avance de la racionalidad instrumental (en detrimento de la razón comunicativa) afrontaremos el debate que han sostenido Habermas y Niklas Luhmann en el seno de la Teoría social alemana. Finalmente, la tercera sección se centra en mostrar las diferencias en la concepción sobre el lugar del derecho en la sociedad, a partir de los marcos teóricos de Habermas y Luhmann.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Devenney, Mark. "Critical theory and radical democracy." Thesis, University of Essex, 1999. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.284602.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Underhill, Michael Alfred. "From Adorno to Habermas : the paradigm shift in critical theory." Thesis, University of Sussex, 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.364586.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis is an investigation into the 'paradigm shift' in Critical Theory which I regard as a critical transformation of Adorno's materialist critique of the philosophy of consciousness to Habermas' intersubjective critique of the philosophy of consciousness. It is concerned primarily, though not exclusively with the writings of Theodor Adorno and Jiirgen Habermas. It is the contention of this thesis that the writings of Adorno are of central importance for an adequate understanding of Habermas' reorientation of Critical Theory. Habermas' more recent writings on Adorno, I wish to argue, do not do justice to Adorno's influence. This thesis develops the argument that Habermas' critique of Adorno is implicit in his earliest writings and it is the aim of this thesis to make this critique explicit. While Habermas' critique of the first generation of Critical Theorists, i.e. that they remain, despite their intentions, caught up in the 'Philosophy of Consciousness', is plausible in broad outline, this critique is inadequately worked through. This deficiency is exacerbated by Habermas' tendency to conflate Adorno with Horkheimer and Marcuse. Therefore, despite these writings, it can be maintained that Habermas' has yet to adequately articulate his critical relationship to Adorno. I take this implicit critique to be the determinate negation of Adorno's critique of the philosophy of consciousness. This thesis is not intended as a comprehensive history of the development of critical theory. Rather it concerns three discrete though related areas. In the first instance I reconstruct Adorno's critique of Ursprungsphilosophie and assess its influence on Habermas' conception of Post-metaphysical Thinking. In the second instance I make an excursus into social theory and assess the shifting conceptions of reification and socialization. Finally I reconstruct Adorno's critique of moral philosophy and assess its impact on Habermas and Apel's Discourse Ethics. In conclusion I survey recent Postmodem ethical theories and assess their challenge to the moral philosophies of Critical Theory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dubouclez, Pauline. "Critique et herméneutique : Adorno, Gadamer, Habermas." Thesis, Paris 4, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA040029.

Full text
Abstract:
Le célèbre débat qui, dans les années soixante, opposa l’herméneutique à la Théorie critique, par l’intermédiaire de leurs principaux représentants respectifs, H.-G. Gadamer et J. Habermas, met en scène une alternative tranchée entre « conscience herméneutique » et « conscience critique » (P.Ricoeur). L’histoire de la Théorie critique montre cependant que sa volonté de s’immerger dans lacrisis qu’est l’histoire, son refus de se constituer en « science traditionnelle » l’amènent à tisser avec l’herméneutique des relations plus complexes qu’il n’y paraît. Ainsi Adorno érige-t-il« l’interprétation » en paradigme de la réflexion philosophique. La théorie habermassienne, dans sa volonté d’assurer à la critique ses fondements de droit, marque une rupture avec un tel paradigme, au profit de celui de la reconstruction. Mais ce tournant, qui vient bouleverser la Théorie critique dans sa conception initiale, n’a-t-il pas pour prix une approche moins pénétrante des phénomènes de domination ? La question est posée par A. Honneth, qui, pour pallier ce déficit critique, élabore une philosophie sociale moins soucieuse de la question de la fondation philosophique et plus hospitalière au thème herméneutique.Cette interrogation ouvre la possibilité d’une relecture de la pensée adornienne, attentive aux accomplissements critiques dont peut se prévaloir la singulière « herméneutique allégorique » qu’elle met en oeuvre
In the Sixties took place a famous debate setting against each other hermeneutics, represented byGadamer, and Critical theory, represented by Habermas. It embodied a deep-seated antagonismbetween « hermeneutical conscience » and « critical conscience » (P. Ricoeur). However, its historyshows that Critical theory’s decision to merge within history, conceived as crisis, and its refusal of« traditional science » lead it to establish complex connections with the hermeneutical trend. ThusAdorno sets up « interpretation » as a paradigm for philosophical thinking. Because he is concernedwith giving Critical theory its philosophical foundation, Habermas breaks with this paradigm, followinginstead the path of reconstruction. This turn undermines the initial conception of Critical theory; andone might ask - as does A. Honneth - if it does not weaken its ability to detect social dominationphenomena. In order to remedy to the critical shortcomings of habermasian theory, Honneth worksout a social philosophy which is less concerned about the question of philosophical foundation andmore open to the hermeneutical motives.This questioning opens the way for a new reading of Adorno’s philosophy, focused on the criticalachievements of « allegorical hermeneutics »
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Boyle, Martin. "Towards justice and validity, an investigation into Habermas' theory of legitimacy." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2001. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/MQ57699.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Cannon, Robert. "Rethinking the normative content of critical theory : Marx, Habermas and beyond." Thesis, Middlesex University, 1998. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/11107/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis criticizes Marx's labour theory of value in terms of Habermas's critique of subject-centred thinking, before going on to criticize Habermas's subject-centred approach to the economic system in terms of an intersubjectively re-formulated conception of labour, for while Habermas restores normative content to the principle of self-constitution he restricts it to communicative action. This places the economic system (and its bureaucratic state apparatus) beyond the normative content of modernity. Drawing upon Honneth's writings on struggles for recognition, the thesis seeks to re-normatize labour on the basis of worker's own struggles to re-normatize the economic system. The first half of the thesis explores the tensions that arise from Marx's attempt to locate his critique of capitalism in a subject-centred conception of self-constitution. Although Marx seeks to historicize the categories of political economy (in line with capitalist exchange relations), he also seeks to preserve a transhistorical conception of labour as the subject of self-objectification (as the standpoint from which to criticize capitalism). However, this leaves Marx vulnerable to his own historical critique of political economy. It is then argued that it is only possible to redeem the latter by re-grounding critical theory in the labour movement's social and historical struggles to oppose capital. This requires a re-formulation of Marx's labour theory of value. In place of Marx's notion that 'value' is an expression of self-objectifying labour we substitute Simmel's intersubjective approach to money-value. Marx's account of value is then understood as arising from the diremption of intersubjectivity into an 'objective' economic system and its 'subjective' agents. This generates a bifurcation of selfconstitution with the intersubjective form of normative social-constitution, on the one side, and the dirempted objective and subjective forms of economic-constitution on the other. The second half of the thesis critically analyzes Habermas' s contention that modern sociality is divided into a normative lifeworld and a non-normative system. This takes the form of an empirical critique of Habermas' s restriction of normativity to communicative action, and a theoretical critique of his restriction of the charge of reification to the economic system's encroachment upon the latter. In keeping with the theory of discourse ethics, it is argued that Habermas cannot legitimately withdraw normative content from labour and claim universal scope for the former. Consequently, not only is the economic system's capacity to suppress the normativity of labour invalid from the standpoint of 'practical reason', but so is Habermas's attempt to legitimate the system on the basis of 'functional reason'. The thesis draws on Honneth's work to extend the realm of intersubjectivity into the economy on the basis of the struggles of the labour movement to sublate its diremption of self-regulating system and self-interested actors. We conclude by arguing that trade unions and the welfare state may be understood to comprise normative vehicles for subjecting 'market-value' to an intersubjectively accountable form of 'social-value'.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Boyle, Martin (Martin Brian Damien) Carleton University Dissertation Law. "Towards justice and validity: an investigation into Habermas' theory of legitimacy." Ottawa, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Mahoney, Brigid Ann. "Jürgen Habermas and the public sphere : critical engagements /." Title page, contents and abstract only, 2001. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09PH/09phm2162.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Nagy, Rosemary Lynne. "Diversity, deliberation and agonistic politics, an Arendtian critique of Habermas' discourse theory." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ26935.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Goode, Luke. "Politics and the public sphere : the social-political theory of Jurgen Habermas." Thesis, Nottingham Trent University, 1999. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.297734.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Habermas' theory"

1

Rasmussen, David M. Reading Habermas. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Murphy, Mark. Habermas, critical theory and education. New York, USA: Routledge, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bolte, Gerhard. Unkritische Theorie: Gegen Habermas. Lüneburg, Germany: zu Klampen, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cirrone, Silvana. Le regole dei giochi: Per un modello procedurale di razionalità : Habermas contro Habermas. Catania: Edizioni del Prisma, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

McCarthy, Thomas A. The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Walter, Neumann. Praxiskritik: J. Habermas' "Erkenntnis und Interesse". Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Haag + Herchen, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Craib, Ian. Modern social theory: From Parsons to Habermas. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Roderick, Rick. Habermas and the foundations of critical theory. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Roderick, Rick. Habermas and the foundations of critical theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Modern social theory: From Parsons to Habermas. 2nd ed. London: Pearson, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Habermas' theory"

1

Burkart, Roland. "On Habermas." In Public Relations and Social Theory, 272–92. Second edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2018.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315271231-15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Roderick, Rick. "Reading Habermas." In Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory, 1–21. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18149-0_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Franco, Raquel Campos, Lili Wang, Pauric O’Rourke, Beth Breeze, Jan Künzl, Chris Govekar, Chris Govekar, et al. "Civil Society Theory: Habermas." In International Encyclopedia of Civil Society, 412–16. New York, NY: Springer US, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_55.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Baynes, Kenneth. "Critical Theory and Habermas." In A Companion to Rawls, 487–503. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118328460.ch28.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Rucht, Dieter. "Civil Society Theory: Habermas." In International Encyclopedia of Civil Society, 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_55-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Feteris, Eveline T. "Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Rationality." In Argumentation Library, 62–72. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9219-2_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Bausch, Kenneth C. "Habermas Since the Debate." In The Emerging Consensus in Social Systems Theory, 69–91. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1263-9_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hermann, Nadja. "Habermas and Philosophy of Education." In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–5. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_324-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hermann, Nadja. "Habermas and Philosophy of Education." In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 949–53. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_324.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Howard, Dick. "From Critical Theory towards Political Theory: Jürgen Habermas." In The Marxian Legacy, 80–114. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19191-8_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Habermas' theory"

1

Zhuang, Yuling, and AnnaMarie Conner. "Teacher questioning strategies in supporting validity of collective argumentation: explanation adapted from habermas' communicative theory." In 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. PMENA, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.51272/pmena.42.2020-387.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Urhan, Selin, and Nazan Sezen Yüksel. "The analysis of problem solving process of pre-service physics teachers by Habermas’ theory of rationality." In TURKISH PHYSICAL SOCIETY 35TH INTERNATIONAL PHYSICS CONGRESS (TPS35). AIP Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5135463.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Acetylena, Sita. "Study Of Ki Hadjar Dewantara Opinion About Human Right And Shari’a In Perspective Theory Of Habermas Critic." In International Conference of Science and Technology for the Internet of Things. EAI, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-10-2018.2282162.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Somova, Oksana, and Pavel Vladimirov. "The problem of intersubjectivity in Western philosophy: Boundaries of the communicative approach." In 6th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.06.08095s.

Full text
Abstract:
The article defines the meaning of the phenomenological approach to the analysis of the concept of intersubjectivity in the context of social and philosophical problems of the balance of the Self and the Other. The discourse is based on the correlation of phenomenological orientation and communicative action in determining the mechanisms of identity of the Self in relation to the Other in the inseparability of social reality. A sequential analysis of prerequisites and research approaches aimed at testing the problem of intersubjectivity is carried out. The focus is placed on social phenomenological research of A. Schutz and the theory of communicative action of J. Habermas, which are aimed at understanding the correlation between the peculiarities of human existence, his life-world and the area of social relations or the inevitability of establishing overindividual patterns. Relevance of the research lies in elaborating the issue of establishing intersubjectivity under the fundamental non-identity of the subjects of communication and their predetermined attitudes. The article concludes by outlining the feasibility of expanding the rational predetermination of the subject-subjective structure of communicative action with the research area of social phenomenology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Somova, Oksana, and Pavel Vladimirov. "The problem of intersubjectivity in Western philosophy: Boundaries of the communicative approach." In 6th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.06.08095s.

Full text
Abstract:
The article defines the meaning of the phenomenological approach to the analysis of the concept of intersubjectivity in the context of social and philosophical problems of the balance of the Self and the Other. The discourse is based on the correlation of phenomenological orientation and communicative action in determining the mechanisms of identity of the Self in relation to the Other in the inseparability of social reality. A sequential analysis of prerequisites and research approaches aimed at testing the problem of intersubjectivity is carried out. The focus is placed on social phenomenological research of A. Schutz and the theory of communicative action of J. Habermas, which are aimed at understanding the correlation between the peculiarities of human existence, his life-world and the area of social relations or the inevitability of establishing overindividual patterns. Relevance of the research lies in elaborating the issue of establishing intersubjectivity under the fundamental non-identity of the subjects of communication and their predetermined attitudes. The article concludes by outlining the feasibility of expanding the rational predetermination of the subject-subjective structure of communicative action with the research area of social phenomenology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Shkorubskaya, Elena. "Transformation of the Scientific Article Paradigm under Diffusion of Internal & External Publicness of Science." In The Public/Private in Modern Civilization, the 22nd Russian Scientific-Practical Conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 16-17, 2020). Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities, Yekaterinburg, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.35853/ufh-public/private-2020-09.

Full text
Abstract:
This article discusses the specifics of the public sphere of science in the context of the diffusion of the public and private spheres that characterises modern society and is driven, among other factors, by the development of social media and other tools of online communication. Based on the communicative approach suggested by Jurgen Habermas, the science field concept by Pierre Bourdieu, and the actor-network theory by Bruno Latour, the following two types of modern science publicness are defined. Inner, ‘esoteric publicness’ of science itself is a prerequisite for scientific communication, and is set up on the principles of reasonable doubt and criticism, assuming discussiveness, knowledge, and uncertainty of arguable facts. Outer, ‘broad publicness’ becomes a platform of interaction between science and society, and requires science to provide ultimate knowledge. Using the example of the use of texts of scientific articles in popular scientific texts, the problem of the diffusion of the two public spheres is examined. Firstly, the conventional layman is confronted directly with the inner workings of science, and thus has to deal with discrepancies, which he cannot resolve on his own. Secondly, the pragmatics of the scientific article undergos changes, its conclusions tend to radicalise, and the very article is used only for confirming the credibility of a popular text referring to it. The change in the reader (a professional is replaced by a layperson) has an effect on the original pragmatics of the text and the impact it has on the addressee. What is supposed to serve as the discussion onset in ‘esoteric publicness’, becomes the rationale for the unconditional recognition of communicated information in the ‘broad publicness’ of science.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Sreeram, R. T., and P. K. Chawdhry. "A Single Function Agent Framework for Task Decomposition and Conflict Negotiation." In ASME 1998 Design Engineering Technical Conferences. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc98/dfm-5748.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Researchers in agent-based concurrent engineering have identified a variety of techniques for product development with the use of multi-agents. Significant but less common are the techniques based on more task-specific single function agents. This paper proposes a single function agent framework for task-solving in a product development environment. This framework is based on Habermas’s theory of communicative action which is particularly suited for collaborative work. The inter-agent communication is based on Knowledge Query Manipulation Language (KQML). The task decomposition of the design process is based on the cluster identification algorithm. The conflicts which arise during the design process are resolved by using very specialized single function agents that detect conflicts based on violation of the design constraints. The case study on the design of a mechanical shaft demonstrates the appropriateness of the proposed framework.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Valuev, Dmitry. "Manifesto & Public Sphere: Action versus Communication." In The Public/Private in Modern Civilization, the 22nd Russian Scientific-Practical Conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 16-17, 2020). Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities, Yekaterinburg, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.35853/ufh-public/private-2020-16.

Full text
Abstract:
The article covers the issue of consistency of manifesto texts with a political system underpinned by publicness principles. The ever-increasing production of manifestos witnesses a crisis in the political system which necessitates the investigation of how such texts influence both their readers and public sphere as a whole. The public sphere concept by J. Habermas, perception of policies by J. Ranciere, and dialogue-based approaches of M. Buber and A. Pyatigorsky constitute the basis for analysing structural elements of a manifesto text, and highlighting their core traits shedding light on the relationship between a manifesto text and the public sphere. Through highlighting the three main elements of a manifesto text, i.e. ‘speaking I’, ‘Object’, and ‘Other’, and by clarifying the configuration of interrelations between the elements, the militant message of a manifesto is asserted as the opposite to the dialogue-based foundation of the public sphere. Such texts postulate the necessity both to eliminate the ‘Other’ and to immediately achieve a set objective by way of taking on an active participative position. The latter to be implemented via the ‘speaking I’ replication mechanism, which is expressed through a call for readers to take on the image of the person speaking through the manifesto. Thus, the manifesto becomes both a tool for getting rid of an existing system incapable of satisfying the needs of an actor, and a tool for leveling political space. Manifesto texts demonstrate the monological basis expressed in the postulation of the necessity for action to uncompromisingly transform the world.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bollini, Letizia. "Fixed, liquid, fluid. Rethinking the digital design process through the ecosystem model." In Systems & Design: Beyond Processes and Thinking. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/ifdp.2016.3013.

Full text
Abstract:
According to the visions and conceptualizations from philosophers to design thinkers such as Habermas, Maturana & Varela or Levin, the design applied to digital artifacts, products and services —due to the convergence of media, communication, deceives and technologies— is becoming even more a a bio-sphere —or better to say with the words of Vernadskij— a Noosphere. The cultural shifting is represented both in the process side and in the approach to the whole design materials and outcomes. On one hand, the organizational structure is moving from an “industrial” approach characterized by a waterfall-process —organized in subsequent of well-structured phases— to an iterative activity —that cycle among ideation, prototyping, testing assessing and redesign phases before to implement and release a project— to the agile and lean approach of the information-era in which the project itself persist constantly in a work-in-progress status —where upgrades and updates have replaced new releases. On the other hand, the object of the project itself is deeply changing according to a vision of a digital ecosystem and consequently to the design approach that is moving from a fixed —a two-dimensional page borrowed-model— to a liquid, then fluid solutions beside the divergences of media and devices and the convergence of user context and experience. Paraphrasing Maldonando we’re moving from virtual to real, from intangible to tangible, from the web to intelligent environment, both digital and physical. In this hybrid space the design process gambles his challenge to change process and purpose embracing both a traversal and a deep vertical approach to single elements of the eco-system and the eco-system in its wide complexity. Nevertheless this transition implies design to face with the challenges of emerging and upcoming phenomena: the designer education —skills, competences, methods— in an hybrid context, the anthropological mutation brought up by the new generation of digital natives and finally the social impact and emotional implication of the confluence of virtual and real experience —mediated by technologies— that people live in their daily life.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/IFDP.2016.3013
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography