Academic literature on the topic 'Guattari'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Guattari.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Guattari"
1
Alliez, Eric. "Guattari with Duchamp, or Du champ from One Sign to the Other." Deleuze and Guattari Studies 16, no. 4 (November 2022): 579–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2022.0495.
Full textAbstract:
Taking as the focus of enquiry the engagements of Félix Guattari with Marcel Duchamp, namely, those rare passages in Schizoanalytic Cartographies and Chaosmosis, the question of the encounter is posed in the field of the sign, but of a sign ‘destructured’ (as Duchamp du signe), in the sense also that Guattari started by destructuring Lacan (from Psychoanalysis and Transversality to Anti-Oedipus). Introduced by the relationships between Guattari and Foucault to better play in between the early and the late Guattari, Guattari’s key insight into the Bottle Rack readymade as an existential function is critically discussed from a reopening to enunciation through the ‘Duchamp effect’. If the latter seems to privilege language contrary to Guattari’s own semiotics, it is to derail it as a machinic unconscious. Duchamp’s writings on his readymades and other machinations are analysed, with the role of Raymond Roussel for Duchamp (and Deleuze-Guattari via Foucault), as well as the implications of a trans-Duchamp, his alter-ego Rrose Sélavy, as an opening to a machinic alterity undoing and queering gender binarity and phallic centricity, recovering the singularity of the bachelor machine and its rupture of subjectivation. The article shows how it could be transversally returned to the very middle of the Guattarian trajectory.
2
Ishtiaque Ahmed, Levin. "Gandhi, Guattari and the Decolonization of the Anthropocene." REGAC - Revista de Estudios Globales y Arte Contempor�neo 8, no. 1 (December 22, 2022): 94–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1344/regac2022.8.41414.
Full textAbstract:
This article examines the relevance of Guattari’s ecosophy and Gandhi’s ecophilosophy to provide an ontological response to environmental (in)justice in the Indian subcontinent in the context of Anthropogenic climate change. Considering what it signifies to live in the Anthropocene, it engages with the Guattarian idea of emancipation and the Gandhian concept of swaraj to understand the ethics of justice in the new climate regime. Through these intellectual encounters, this article develops an ontological framework for addressing the question of human agency in the Anthropocene considering the long history of decolonization in South Asia which was largely shaped by Gandhi’s idea of swaraj. To facilitate engagement across diverse philosophical cultures for the purpose of decolonizing the Anthropocene, this article seeks to understand possible points of alliance between Guattarian ecosophy and Gandhian ecophilosophy. This cross-cultural conversation becomes pertinent when neoliberal capitalism is radically transforming the lives and landscapes of the planet, reconfiguring the registers of what Guattari (2000) has called the three ecologies: namely those of the environment, social relations and human subjectivity. This cross-cultural confluence of philosophical ideas unveils how the ecologies of both humans and nonhumans are globally reconfigured according to the logic of neoliberal capitalism. Therefore, this article seeks to conjoin Guattarian ecosophy and Gandhian ecophilosophy to understand environmental (in)justice in the Indian subcontinent in the context of anthropogenic climate change. Reflecting on Gandhian ideas with the help of Guattarian ecosophy would help us understand the detrimental effects of the colonial Anthropocene. The condition of the Global South is still deeply colonial, which is marked by economic inequality and social injustice. Therefore, engaging with Gandhi and Guattari in the Anthropocene is a task of radical ecological imagination. This article elaborates on this project of radical ecological vision by drawing their philosophical contributions.
3
Gerlach, Joe, and Thomas Jellis. "Guattari." Dialogues in Human Geography 5, no. 2 (July 2015): 131–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2043820615587787.
Full text
4
Alliez, Eric. "Der Guattari-Deleuze-Effekt." ZMK Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung 2/1/2011: Offene Objekte 2, no. 1 (2011): 55–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.28937/1000107522.
Full textAbstract:
Statt von einem Guattari-Effekt auf Deleuze muss man von einem Guattari-Deleuze-Effekt sprechen, um ein wechselseitiges Einwirken in einem gemeinsamen Projekt zu beschreiben, das mit dem Herausgehen aus der klassischen Psychoanalyse beginnt und in den Umbau der Philosophie in der Öffnung auf ihr Außen mündet. Dieser Umbau lässt das Paradigma der Interpretation ebenso hinter sich wie jenes der Struktur. In der Kritik an Lacan vollziehen Deleuze und Guattari die Abkehr vom Postulat des Primats der Sprache als Struktur und eines durch sie immer schon konstituierten und vom Realen ebenso wie von kollektiven Individuationsprozessen abgeschnittenen Subjekts. Die heterogenen Ausdrucksmaterien Hjelmslevs, die das Aufbrechen der Opposition von Sprachzeichen und Materie ermöglichen sowie die Konzepte der Wunschmaschine und mehr noch des Gefüges eröffnen den Weg hin zu einem Politisch-Werden der Philosophie als Wiederaneignung der Produktionsmittel kollektiver Subjektivität. </br></br>In order to understand the collaborators' mutual impact in a joint project that began with Deleuze and Guattari's transgression of classical psychoanalysis and advanced to their complete remodeling of philosophy, the notion of a »Guattari-Deleuze-effect« is more adequate than the presumption an unilateral »Guattari-effect« upon Deleuze. Furthermore, Deleuze's and Guattari's concerted efforts leave the paradigms of »interpretation« and »structure« behind; in their critique of Lacan, Deleuze and Guattari turn away from the primate of language as structure and the postulate of an always already constituted subject that is cut off both from the real and from collective processes of individuation. Finally, the concept of a heterogeneous »matter of expression,« which, borrowed from Hjelmslev, allows opening up the opposition between linguistic sign and matter, as well as the concepts of »desiring-machine« and »assemblage«, clear the way towards a becoming-political of philosophy, understood as reappropriation of collective subjectivity's means of production.
5
Genosko, Gary. "Guattari TV, By Kafka." Deleuze Studies 6, no. 2 (May 2012): 210–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2012.0058.
Full textAbstract:
Guattari looked for crossovers between film and television in a posthumously published ‘Project for a Film By Kafka’. His critical comments on television and the mixed reception of television within the Deleuzo-Guattarian literature provide the occasion for an investigation of what Guattari thought television could do for his project. The auteur model best suits his needs in this regard, with the proviso that it is animated by a modernist aesthetic oriented towards the conjuring of a people to come who would join the Kafka assemblage as part of their viewing experience.
6
Bell, Jeffrey A. "History Undone: Towards a Deleuzo-Guattarian Philosophy of History." Deleuze Studies 2, no. 1 (June 2008): 109–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/e1750224108000196.
Full textAbstract:
For those familiar with the work of Deleuze, and Deleuze and Guattari, it might at first seem unwise to pursue a Deleuze and Guattarian philosophy of history. After all, is it not Deleuze who, in an interview with Antonio Negri, argues that ‘What history grasps in an event is the way it’s actualized in particular circumstances; the event's becoming is beyond the scope of history'? (Deleuze 1995 : 170). And more damningly, Deleuze adds, ‘History isn’t experimental, it's just the set of more or less negative preconditions that make it possible to experiment with something beyond history' (Deleuze 1995 : 170). History, in short, is a starting point for experimental work, but it is precisely history ‘that one leaves behind in order to “become,” that is, to create something new’ (1995: 171). Similarly in A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari argue that ‘History is made by those who oppose history (not by those who insert themselves into it, or even reshape it)’ (Deleuze and Guattari 1987 : 295). In the very first line of his book, Lampert recognizes the possible conclusion these citations might lead one to, namely, ‘Deleuze and Guattari’s philosophy of becoming seems at times opposed to the very idea of historical succession' (1); and yet, as Lampert adeptly demonstrates, it would be a mistake to conclude that opposing history to ‘create something new’, ‘something beyond history’, necessarily entails being hostile to history, to the ‘idea of historical succession’, and thus to a philosophy of history.
7
Žukauskaitė, Audronė. "GILLES’IO DELEUZE’O IR FELIXO GUATTARI MIKROPOLITIKA ŠIUOLAIKINĖS FILOSOFIJOS KONTEKSTE." Problemos 75 (January 1, 2009): 34–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/problemos.2009.0.1978.
Full textAbstract:
Straipsnyje analizuojama Gilles’io Deleuze’o ir Felixo Guattari kuriama mikropolitikos samprata, kuri priešpriešinama makropolitikai, veikiančiai pripažintų politinių teorijų ir apibrėžtų tapatybių lygmenyje. Mikropolitikos projektas siejamas su tapsmo mažuma, mažosios literatūros, mažosios politikos sampratomis, kurios nukreiptos ne į tapatybės kūrimą, bet į tapsmo procesą, inovaciją, eksperimentą. Deleuze’as ir Guattari teigia, jog tapsmas mažuma yra universalus procesas, kurio tikslas – kiekvieno individo autonomija. Deleuze‘o ir Guattari universalaus tapsmo koncepcija priešpriešinama Alaino Badiou kuriamai karingojo universalizmo sampratai. Badiou postuluojamas universalizmas iš pirmo žvilgsnio yra panašus į Deleuze’o ir Guattari siūlomos tapsmo teorijos universalumą, tačiau abiejų teorijų turinys radikaliai skiriasi. Deleuze’ui ir Guattari pats tapsmas mažuma yra universalus procesas; Badiou, priešingai, mažumas ir skirtumus pasitelkia tam, kad juos redukuotų į lygybę ir vienodumą. Badiou siekia panaikinti skirtumus dėl universalizmo, kuris pasiekiamas per tiesos įvykį, bendrą visiems ir kiekvienam.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: mikropolitika, mažoji literatūra, tapsmas mažuma, paskirybė, universalizmas.Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s Micropolitics in the Context of Contemporary PhilosophyAudronė Žukauskaitė SummaryThe article discusses Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of micropolitics in relation with the notions of minor literature and becoming-minoritarian. The concept of minor literature appears in Deleuze and Guattari’s Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature and is defined by three characteristics: 1) the deterritorialization of language; 2) the connection of the individual to a political immediacy; 3) the collective assemblage of enunciation. The notion of minor literature is closely related with the notion of becoming-minoritarian developed in A Thousand Plateaus. Deleuze and Guattari claim that becoming-minoritarian is the universal figure of consciousness. In this sense, any kind of becoming is a revolutionary act, because it changes the political constellation of power and enables the repressed to reach an autonomous condition. The concept of becoming-minoritarian is introduced to the contemporary political context through the notion of minor politics, discussed by Nicholas Thoburn. Minor politics is seen not as a fetishization of marginal identity but rather as a possibility to legitimize the existence of those who lack any social identity. In this sense, the notions of becoming-minoritarian and minor politics are contrasted with Alain Badiou’s claim to universality: the question is raised as to whether becoming-minoritarian should necessarily end in autonomy, as Deleuze and Guattari argue, or, by contrast, whether it should seek to universalize the minor and in this way raise the claim for universal justice.Keywords: micropolitics, minor literature, becoming-minoritiarian, the particular, universalism.
8
Alliez, Éric, and Anne Querrien. "L'effet-guattari." Multitudes 34, no. 3 (2008): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/mult.034.0022.
Full text
9
Doel, Marcus A. "Applied Guattari." Dialogues in Human Geography 5, no. 2 (July 2015): 167–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2043820615587793.
Full text
10
Genosko, Gary. "FÉLIX GUATTARI." Angelaki 8, no. 1 (April 2003): 129–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09697250301196.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Guattari"
1
Souza, David Britto de. "A Subjetividade MaquÃnica em Guattari." Universidade Federal do CearÃ, 2008. http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=3283.
Full textAbstract:
nÃo hÃA presente pesquisa se propÃs a dois objetivos principais: 1) Um geral, que serà expor o conceito de subjetividade maquÃnica de Felix Guattari; 2) e um outro, mais especÃfico, que pretende analisar as contribuiÃÃes deste conceito para uma compreensÃo mais social e ampla da subjetividade, levando em consideraÃÃo a heterogeneidade nÃo-humana, maquÃnica, desta produÃÃo, fato este que se evidencia fortemente no capitalismo pÃs-industrial. Mostramos como a produÃÃo de subjetividade à a indÃstria de base deste pe-rÃodo e os pontos de ruptura possÃveis encontrados por Guattari, proporcionados pelos avanÃos tecnolÃgicos e as formas de organizaÃÃo social caracterÃsticos deste perÃodo. Frente à massificaÃÃo e homogeneizaÃÃo da produÃÃo de subjetividade, a teoria guatta-riana propÃe uma produÃÃo singularizante e autÃnoma, a partir de um paradigma Ãtico-estÃtico, baseada em seu conceito de ecosofia, o qual propÃe uma articulaÃÃo Ãtico-polÃtica da subjetividade, do social e do ambiental. A subjetividade à maquÃnica, ou seja, à produzida no socius atravÃs de elementos heterogÃneos como as relaÃÃes sociais, as mÃquinas tecnolÃgicas, as mÃquinas incorporais, o Ãmbito estÃtico, a economia, a polÃtica etc. AtravÃs dos conceitos de micropolÃtica, autopoiese e pÃs-mÃdia vimos as indicaÃÃes de como à possÃvel uma produÃÃo de subjetividade mais autÃnoma e singular.
This work intents to address two main themes:1) At large, we aim to explain the concept of âmachinic subjectivityâ coined by Felix Guattari; 2) In a more specific way we tried to analyse the contributions that this concept brings to the understanding of the subjectivity in a more social and wide way considering the heterogeneity not-human, machinic of this production, fact that is strongly noted on the postindustrial capitalism. We have demonstrated that the production of subjectivity is the base industry of this period e the breaking possible points found by Guattari that have been possible by the technological advancements and the forms of social organization of this period. Before the massification and homogenization of subjectivity production the guattarian theory propose a singular and autonomy production from a ethic-esthetic paradigm based on his concept of ecosophy that propose an articulation ethic-politic of subjectivity, social and environment. The subjectivity is machinic it means that it is a production from socius through heterogenic elements such as social relations, technological and invisible machines, aesthetic field, the economy, the politics etc. Through the concepts of micro-politics, autopoiesis and post-media we saw how a production of subjectivity can be more close to autonomy and singularity
2
SOUZA, David Britto de. "A subjetividade maquínica em Guattari." http://www.teses.ufc.br, 2008. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/2239.
Full textAbstract:
SOUZA , David Britto de. A subjetividade maquínica em Guattari. 2008. 125 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Psicologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Fortaleza-CE, 2008.Submitted by moises gomes (celtinha_malvado@hotmail.com) on 2012-01-05T13:38:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_dis_DBDSouza.PDF: 763408 bytes, checksum: 5d1a290d8b9c1d542e979981a0087f03 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Maria Josineide Góis(josineide@ufc.br) on 2012-03-08T13:30:51Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_dis_DBDSouza.PDF: 763408 bytes, checksum: 5d1a290d8b9c1d542e979981a0087f03 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2012-03-08T13:30:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_dis_DBDSouza.PDF: 763408 bytes, checksum: 5d1a290d8b9c1d542e979981a0087f03 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-09-30
This work intents to address two main themes:1) At large, we aim to explain the concept of ‘machinic subjectivity’ coined by Felix Guattari; 2) In a more specific way we tried to analyse the contributions that this concept brings to the understanding of the subjectivity in a more social and wide way considering the heterogeneity not-human, machinic of this production, fact that is strongly noted on the postindustrial capitalism. We have demonstrated that the production of subjectivity is the base industry of this period e the breaking possible points found by Guattari that have been possible by the technological advancements and the forms of social organization of this period. Before the massification and homogenization of subjectivity production the guattarian theory propose a singular and autonomy production from a ethic-esthetic paradigm based on his concept of ecosophy that propose an articulation ethic-politic of subjectivity, social and environment. The subjectivity is machinic it means that it is a production from socius through heterogenic elements such as social relations, technological and invisible machines, aesthetic field, the economy, the politics etc. Through the concepts of micro-politics, autopoiesis and post-media we saw how a production of subjectivity can be more close to autonomy and singularity
A presente pesquisa se propôs a dois objetivos principais: 1) Um geral, que será expor o conceito de subjetividade maquínica de Felix Guattari; 2) e um outro, mais específico, que pretende analisar as contribuições deste conceito para uma compreensão mais social e ampla da subjetividade, levando em consideração a heterogeneidade não-humana, maquínica, desta produção, fato este que se evidencia fortemente no capitalismo pós-industrial. Mostramos como a produção de subjetividade é a indústria de base deste pe-ríodo e os pontos de ruptura possíveis encontrados por Guattari, proporcionados pelos avanços tecnológicos e as formas de organização social característicos deste período. Frente à massificação e homogeneização da produção de subjetividade, a teoria guatta-riana propõe uma produção singularizante e autônoma, a partir de um paradigma ético-estético, baseada em seu conceito de ecosofia, o qual propõe uma articulação ético-política da subjetividade, do social e do ambiental. A subjetividade é maquínica, ou seja, é produzida no socius através de elementos heterogêneos como as relações sociais, as máquinas tecnológicas, as máquinas incorporais, o âmbito estético, a economia, a política etc. Através dos conceitos de micropolítica, autopoiese e pós-mídia vimos as indicações de como é possível uma produção de subjetividade mais autônoma e singular.
3
Barthold, Charles. "Resisting financialisation with Deleuze and Guattari." Thesis, University of Leicester, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2381/32895.
Full textAbstract:
This thesis wanted to operate two tasks. First, this thesis sought to perform a description of the contemporary functioning of the economy, that is to say of capitalism. This entailed an analysis of the current financialisation of world capitalism. Second, this thesis wanted to identify a revolutionary resistant subjectivity to financialisation. This implied to look for a subjectivity which could successfully resist the power of finance. The first task, that is to say the description of the contemporary economy, was performed through an engagement with an interdisciplinary and Marxian literature that problematised financialisation as a process related not only to the economy and production, but also to the State, social reproduction and even subjectivity. Marxism allowed me to understand the dynamics of capitalism and the current centrality of finance, which was expressed by the concept of financialisation. However, Marxism was unable to provide a sophisticated political strategy which would be based on a specific revolutionary subjectivity. Marx’s oeuvre never provided very effective political strategies. Therefore, the political economy of Marx was often complemented by Leninism as a form of political strategy, based on party politics and the vanguard of the proletariat. However, Leninism was connected to Fordist capitalism. Therefore, a new political strategy was needed in the context of financialisation. The work of Deleuze and Guattari provided a novel conceptualisation of subjectivity which could articulate a revolutionary resistance to financialisation. My revolutionary understanding of the oeuvre of Deleuze and Guattari was situated by an analysis of their reception by political philosophy because alternative interpretations existed. Therefore, this thesis sought to operate a fruitful dialogue, that is to say a resonance between Marx and Deleuze and Guattari.
4
Santos, Zamara Araujo dos 1966. "A geofilosofia de Deleuze e Guattari." [s.n.], 2013. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/280012.
Full textAbstract:
Orientadores: Luiz Benedicto Lacerda Orlandi, Anne SauvagnarguesTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-23T20:28:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Santos_ZamaraAraujodos_D.pdf: 2473466 bytes, checksum: ebe225a7284915bf42fea52db3ec0b94 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013
Resumo: A Geofilosofia é um conceito tardio na obra de Deleuze e Guattari e, embora se aplique ao último livro em parceria, Qu'est-ce que la Philosophie ?, trata-se de uma noção que envolve suas principais criações conceituais, circunscrevendo o período de Capitalisme et schizophrénie, mas dialogando com noções e momentos distintos da obra dos autores. Sob a rubrica da noção, a filosofia consagra a conexão de um plano de imanência absoluto derivado de um meio imanente e social que constitui a conjunção de relações variáveis entre o território e a terra. Assim, o ato de pensar não gravita sob a órbita das categorias sujeito e objeto, mas concerne a um meio intensivo e contingente, que, compondo uma ambiência de circunstâncias externas, demarca um campo de conexões e fronteiras de relações múltiplas e devires que contornam o molar e o molecular, estabelecendo um regime de troca, captura e sobrecodificação dos códigos. Nesse traçado, o pensamento e os conceitos invocam um "fora", um devir molecular, devires animais e imperceptíveis que povoam o território e os agenciamentos, perfilham conexões, ramificações heterogêneas e rizomáticas que seguem por linhas intensivas, conjurando forças e movimentos da terra que operam por movimentos diagramáticos, geodésia e desterritorialização. Configura-se, com efeito, uma cartografia dos deslocamentos, direções e trajetos que circunscreve o mapa de uma geografia agitada por linhas de fuga, longitudes e latitudes, sendo essas, portanto, as condições do plano de imanência absoluto do pensamento, de sua desterritorialização e reterritorialização
Abstract: Geophilosophy is a lag concept in Deleuze and Guattari's work, and besides it can be applied at the last book in partnership Qu'est-ce que la Philosophie?, it is a notion that involves their main conceptual creations, circumscribing the period of Capitalisme et schizophrénie, but in dialogue with distincts notions and moments of both autors work. Under the heading of the notion, philosophy consecrates the conexion of an absolut immanence plan derivative of a social and immanent environment that constitutes the conjunction of variable relations between the territory and the earth. This way, the act of thinking doesn't gravitate in the orbit of the categories of subject and object, but concerns to a intensive and contingent environment, that, setting an ambience of external circunstances, delimits a field of conexions and borders, of multiple relations and becomings that skirts the molar and the molecular, establishing a system of change, capture and overcoding of the codes. In this route, the thought and the concepts invocate an "outside", a molecular becoming, animal and inconspicuous becomings that settle the territory and the assemblages, profiling conexions, heterogeneous and rhizomatic ramifications that follow by intensive lines, conjuring forces and movements of earth that operates by diagrammatic movements, geodey and deterritorialization. Setting up, in effect, a cartography of displacements, directions and pathways that circumscribes the map of a geography agitated by creepage, longitudes and latitudes, being these, by the way, the conditions of the absolut immanence plan of thinking, of its deterritorialization and reterritorialization
Doutorado
Filosofia
Doutor em Filosofia
5
Camargo, André Campos de 1979. "Félix Guattari : subjetividade, capitalismo e educação." [s.n.], 2014. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/253965.
Full textAbstract:
Orientador: Silvio Donizetti de Oliveira GalloDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-24T16:29:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Camargo_AndreCamposde_M.pdf: 897486 bytes, checksum: ad576261e8ca9dd0fd3e00b1ddc8a19a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014
Resumo: A obra conceitual de Félix Guattari - formada por livros, cursos, artigos, entrevistas, etc.- pode ser descrita como o resultado de sua intensa militância política misturada à prática clínica e às leituras filosóficas, científicas e artísticas. Nela encontramos ecos de um antigo e grande projeto geral que permeou as pesquisas de inúmeros intelectuais desde Kant e que em sua época constituía uma pergunta da qual se ocupavam vários pensadores franceses. Tal projeto pode ser resumido pela questão: como nos tornamos o que somos? Nessa (im) possível filiação, Guattari parece ter respondido: tornamo-nos o que somos pela produção de subjetividade. Mas antes de respondê-la, ele formulou inúmeras perguntas, como por exemplo: Qual a relação do capitalismo com a produção de subjetividade? A produção de subjetividade é estritamente humana? Como os processos de subjetivação organizam a subjetividade na atualidade? Por que uma determinada produção de subjetividade se faz presente e não outra? Os equipamentos coletivos funcionam como produtores de subjetividade? É possível resistir aos processos de produção de subjetividade? Analisar a obra de Guattari, tendo em vista esse provável projeto geral em que ela se insere e os questionamentos que ela suscita frente ao presente, nos parece uma tarefa gigantesca, mas possível de ser realizada. Para que possamos tratá-la no limite desta dissertação, elaboraremos uma introdução ao pensamento de Guattari, buscando apresentar o conceito de subjetividade maquínica e o de produção de subjetividade capitalística - conceitos que parecem cortar transversalmente toda obra do pensador francês e dar sustentação aos demais conceitos ¿ com o intuito de compreendermos o papel da instituição escolar no processo de subjetivação dos indivíduos na atualidade
Abstract: The conceptual oeuvre of Félix Guattari, portrayed by books, essays, articles, lectures, courses and interviews, are the result not only of his intense political activism but also of his clinical practice and readings about philosophy, science and art. We also find in his works echoes of an old overall project that could be summarized by a question on which French scholars, among a several number of other intellectuals, have been discussing since Kant. This project corresponds to the question: How did we become what we are? Regarding this (im) possible association, Guattari seems to reply that we become what we are by producing subjectivity. Before attempting to answer the issue, he formulated several questions such as: What is the relation between capitalism and subjectivity production? Is the subjectivity production strictly human? How do the subjectivation procedures (the active production of subjectivity) organize the subjectivity currently? Why does a specific subjectivity production take place instead of another? Do the collectivity instances work as subjectivity producers? Is it possible to withstand the processes of subjectivity production? Although an analysis of Guattari's works seems an ambitious proposal, as regards the overall project in which his works are inserted and the questions raised by them towards contemporaneity, it can be done. In order to achieve it, this dissertation aims to develop this analysis attempting to comprehend the educational institution role in the subjectivation process of the individuals at the present time. Considering this goal, we will elaborate an introduction to Guattari's thought. This will allow us to introduce the concepts of the machinic subjectivity as well as the production of capitalistic subjectivity, concepts which seem to be throughout Guattari's oeuvre and also appear to support the remaining concepts, significant for the analysis
Mestrado
Filosofia e História da Educação
Mestre em Educação
6
Araujo, dos Santos Zamara. "A geophilosofia de Deleuze e Guattari." Thesis, Paris 10, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA100135/document.
Full textAbstract:
La Géophilosophie est un concept tardif dans l’oeuvre de Deleuze et Guattari, et bien qu’il s’applique au dernier livre qu’ils ont écrit ensemble « Qu´est-ce que la Philosophie ? », il s’agit d’une notion qui enveloppe leurs principales créations conceptuelles et circonscrit la période de « Capitalisme et schizophrénie », tout en dialoguant avec des notions et des moments distincts de l’oeuvre des auteurs. Sous la rubrique de cette notion, la philosophie se définit selon le rapport entre un plan d’immanence qu’il s’agira de définir et d’un milieu immanent et social constituant une conjonction de relations variables entre le territoire et la terre. Ainsi l’acte de penser ne gravite-t-il pas dans l’orbite des catégories du sujet et de l’objet, mais concerne un milieu intensif et contingent qui, tout en composant une milieu de circonstances extérieures, délimite un champ de connexions et frontières, de relations multiples et de devenirs, qui contournent le molaire et le moléculaire en établissant un régime d’échange, de capture et de surcodage de codes. Selon ce tracé, la pensée et les concepts invoquent un “ dehors”, un devenir moléculaire, que Deleuze et Guattari analysent en utilisant les concepts de devenirs-animaux et imperceptibles. Ce sont ces concepts que nous cherchons à expliquer, dans la mesure où ils explorent le caractère géophilosophique de la pensée, dans son rapport aux concepts de territoire et d’agencements. Nous entendons en délinéer les connexions, les ramifications hétérogènes et rhizomatiques qui suivent des lignes intensives en conjurant des forces et des mouvements de la terre, et qui opèrent par des mouvements diagrammatiques, géodésie et déterritorialisation. En effet, une cartographie des déplacements, directions et chemins circonscrivant la carte d’une géographie agitée par des lignes de fuite, des longitudes et des lattitudes est configurée. Ces conditions définissent le plan d’immanence de la pensée, de sa déterritorialisation et de sa reterritorialisationGeophilosophy is a lag concept in Deleuze and Guattari’s work, and besides its can be applied at the last book in partnership « Qu´est-ce que la Philosophie ? », it is a notion that involves their main conceptual creations, circumscribing the period of Capitalisme et schizophrénie, but in dialogue with distincts notions and moments of both autors work. Under the heading of the notion, philosophy consecrates the conexion of a absolut immanence plan derivative of a social and immanent environment that constitutes the conjunction of variable relations between the territory and the earth. This way, the act of thinking doesn’t gravitate in the orbit of the categories of suject and object, but concerns to a intensive and contingent environment, that, setting an ambience of external circunstances, delimits a field of conexions and borders, of multiple relations and becomings that skirts the molar and the molecular, establishing a system of change, capture and overcoding of the codes. In this route, the thought and the concepts invocate an « outside », a molecular becoming, animal and inconspicuous becomings that settle the territory and the assemblages, profiling conexions, heterogeneous and rhizomatic ramifications that follow by intensive lines, conjuring forces and movements of earth that operates by diagrammatic movements, geodey and deterritorialization. Setting up, in effect, a cartography of displacements, directions and pathways that circumscribes the map of a geography agitated by creepage, longitudes and latitudes, being these, by the way, the conditions of the absolut immanence plan of thinking, of its deterritorialization and reterritorialization
A Geofilosofia é um conceito tardio na obra de Deleuze e Guattari e, embora se aplique aoúltimo livro em parceria, Qu´est-ce que la Philosophie ?, trata-se de uma noção queenvolve suas principais criações conceituais, circunscrevendo o período de Capitalisme etschizophrénie, mas dialogando com noções e momentos distintos da obra dos autores. Soba rubrica da noção, a filosofia consagra a conexão de um plano de imanência absolutoderivado de um meio imanente e social que constitui a conjunção de relações variáveisentre o território e a terra. Assim, o ato de pensar não gravita sob a órbita das categoriassujeito e objeto, mas concerne a um meio intensivo e contingente, que, compondo umaambiência de circunstâncias externas, demarca um campo de conexões e fronteiras derelações múltiplas e devires que contornam o molar e o molecular, estabelecendo umregime de troca, captura e sobrecodificação dos códigos. Nesse traçado, o pensamento e osconceitos invocam um “fora”, um devir molecular, devires animais e imperceptíveis quepovoam o território e os agenciamentos, perfilham conexões, ramificações heterogêneas erizomáticas que seguem por linhas intensivas, conjurando forças e movimentos da terra queoperam por movimentos diagramáticos, geodésia e desterritorialização. Configura-se, comefeito, uma cartografia dos deslocamentos, direções e trajetos que circunscreve o mapa deuma geografia agitada por linhas de fuga, longitudes e latitudes, sendo essas, portanto, ascondições do plano de imanência absoluto do pensamento, de sua desterritorialização ereterritorialização
7
Ferreira, Rafael Leopoldo Antonio dos Santos. "Deleuze e Guattari: crítica a psicanálise freudiana." Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, 2015. https://repositorio.ufjf.br/jspui/handle/ufjf/2233.
Full textAbstract:
Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2016-07-26T18:17:18Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
rafaelleopoldo.pdf: 2583906 bytes, checksum: 56c51a04683d46beb28399ab1438c4fa (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2016-07-27T11:31:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 rafaelleopoldo.pdf: 2583906 bytes, checksum: 56c51a04683d46beb28399ab1438c4fa (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-27T11:31:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 rafaelleopoldo.pdf: 2583906 bytes, checksum: 56c51a04683d46beb28399ab1438c4fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015
OBJETIVO: O principal objetivo deste trabalho é fazer um levantamento da crítica dos filósofos Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari ao psicanalista Sigmund Freud. Antes de adentramos neste principal objetivo, no entanto, perpassamos brevemente a constituição da Filosofia da Psicanálise, posto que este trabalho se encontra nesta linha de pesquisa. Colocado este elemento é analisado um pouco da história da psicanálise para compreendermos o local que Deleuze e Guattari se encontram. Diante destes pontos introdutórios nos voltamos a obra O Anti-Édipo: capitalismo e esquizofrenia. Neste livro delimitamos a crítica a psicanálise em seus principais elementos. Exposta a análise dos filósofos da obra freudiana fazemos um segundo movimento que é uma análise dos textos de Freud. Esta análise tenta perpassar e reconstituir os principais conceitos criticados pelos filósofos como, por exemplo, o desejo, o inconsciente, o complexo de Édipo e a castração. Esta reconstituição dos conceitos freudianos se dá na medida do possível sem a lente deleuzo-guattariana. Assim sendo, é admissível fazermos um terceiro movimento que é pensar a crítica de Deleuze e Guattari a Freud.
Objective: The main objective of this work is to analyze the critic of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari to Sigmund Freud work. However, before we enter this main goal, we briefly see the constitution of Philosophy of Psychoanalysis, since this work is in this line of research. Set this point we see part of the history of psychoanalysis to understand the place of Deleuze and Guattari on it. After these introductory points we turn to the book Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and squizophrenia. In this book we delimit the criticism of psychoanalysis in its main elements. Exposed the analysis of Freud’s work made by the philosophers we make a second movement that is analyze Freud’s work. This analysis attempts to pervade and replenish the mains concepts criticized, for example, the desire, the unconscious, the Oedipus complex and Castration. This reconstitution of Freudian concepts is given as far as possible without the Deleuze-guattarian lens. Now, we have the possibility of one third movement that is to think the criticism of Deleuze and Guattari to Freud.
8
Carneiro, Altair de Souza. "Deleuze & Guattari: uma ética dos devires." Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana, 2013. http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/2046.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T18:26:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Altair de S Carneiro.pdf: 1000631 bytes, checksum: 8be996c38ca852bebd9494c77a23da40 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-07-24Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Cette dissertation recherche l éthique des devenirs présente dans les uvres de Gilles Deleuze et Félix Guattari. D abord, elle aborde la Philosophie Pratique créée par les philosophes cités ci-dessus; souligne le privilège donné au mouvement plutôt qu au repos, à la variation continue au détriment de la forme déterminée et de la structure, aux videments qui sont toujours en voie de dissoudre l organisation et la stabilité des structures endurcies, à l indéfini sur ce qui a déjà fini, à la primauté de l informel et de l illimité sur l équilibre des formes et la mesure des limites; elle aborde aussi les paires conceptuelles nomadisme et sédentarisation, déterritorialisation et territoire, moléculaire et molaire. Pour montrer que cette éthique des devenirs se rapporte directement à une politique de l existence, la deuxième partie de la recherche recourt aux procédés artistiques théâtral de Carmelo Bene et littéraire de Franz Kafka; telles créations fonctionnent comme des outils pour la création du concept de mineur , ce qui est indispensable à l invention du concept de devenir, d une fois que tout devenir est mineur. Finalement, au troisième chapitre, on présente une typologie des devenirs qui affirme l immanence de l existence; typologie produite sans prétention d universalité car il ne s agit pas d une représentation pour tous, ni avec de l ambition essentialiste, car elle n affirme pas que ces types soient une essence pour tous, moins encore qu ils soient les uniques composants d une typologie des devenirs; les types choisis ont eu, en tant que critère, la plus grande insistance dans l uvre des philosophes, et ce sont bien eux qui, dans la perspective de cette recherche, rendent possible l accomplissement d une éthique des devenirs, quels qu ils soient: devenir-femme, devenir-enfant, devenir-animal, devenir-révolutionnaire et devenir-imperceptible. La recherche a été produite dans le cadre du Projet Escrileituras: um modo de ler-escrever em meio à vida de l Observatoire de l Education/CAPES/INEP-2010 réalisé conjointement à l UFRGS, à l UNIOESTE, à l UFPel et à l UFMT , qui a comme référentiel théorique la Philosophie de la Différence et s occupe de faire de la pensée le chemin même de sa production; à travers des parcours inconnus et ouverts trace des détours et opère des ruptures avec le déjà su et légitimé comme des vérités instituées; pensée qui opère orientée par une politique et une éthique des devenirs, où la création est indispensable pour rebattre les phénomènes d imitation et de standardisation en produisant des manières de vie inouïes.
Esta dissertação investiga a ética dos devires presente nas obras de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari. Em um primeiro momento aborda a Filosofia Prática criada pelos referidos filósofos; destaca o privilégio que é dado ao movimento ao invés do repouso, à variação contínua em detrimento da forma determinada e da estrutura, aos vazamentos que sempre estão em vias de dissolver a organização e a estabilidade das estruturas enrijecidas, ao indefinido sobre o já acabado, à primazia do informal e ilimitado sobre o equilíbrio das formas e a medida dos limites; também aborda os pares conceituais nomadismo e sedentarismo, desterritorialização e território, molecular e molar. A fim de mostrar que esta ética dos devires está diretamente relacionada com uma política da existência, a segunda parte da pesquisa recorre aos procedimentos artísticos teatral de Carmelo Bene e literário de Franz Kafka, os quais funcionam como ferramentas para a criação do conceito de menor , o qual é imprescindível para a invenção do conceito de devir, uma vez que todo devir é menor. Por fim, no terceiro capítulo, é apresentada uma tipologia dos devires que afirma a imanência da existência; tipologia produzida sem pretensão de universalidade, porque não se trata de uma representação para todos, nem com ambição essencialista, pois não afirma que estes tipos sejam uma essência para todos, menos ainda que sejam os únicos componentes de uma tipologia dos devires; os tipos escolhidos tiveram como critério a maior insistência na obra dos filósofos, e são eles que, na perspectiva desta pesquisa, possibilitam a efetivação de uma ética dos devires, quais sejam: devir-mulher, devir-criança, devir-animal, devir-revolucionário e devir-imperceptível. A pesquisa foi produzida no âmbito do Projeto Escrileituras: um modo de ler-escrever em meio à vida do Observatório da Educação/CAPES/INEP-2010 realizado concomitantemente na UFRGS, na UNIOESTE, na UFPel e na UFMT , o qual tem como referencial teórico a Filosofia da Diferença e ocupa-se de fazer do pensamento o próprio caminho de sua produção; através de percursos desconhecidos e abertos traça desvios e opera rupturas com o já sabido e legitimado como verdades instituídas; pensamento este que opera orientado por uma política e uma ética dos devires, em que a criação é imprescindível para rebater os fenômenos de imitação e de padronização produzindo modos de vida inauditos.
9
Park, Daeseung. "La stratégie minoritaire chez Deleuze et Guattari." Thesis, Toulouse 2, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020TOU20003.
Full textAbstract:
La présente thèse se propose d’examiner les éléments de la stratégie d’émancipation dans la perspective guattaro-deleuzienne de la minorité. L’enjeu est de montrer comment le « devenir-minoritaire » élaboré dans Mille plateaux opère comme « stratégie minoritaire » révolutionnaire. L’opposé de celle-ci est la « stratégie majoritaire » que représente la théorie de Gramsci sur l’« hégémonie ». Afin de définir ces deux stratégies et de formuler leur « antinomie », nous prenons d’abord la réflexion de Balibar sur les « stratégies de civilité » pour guide de la recherche. Cette thèse a trois moments. La Première partie porte sur le concept de « stratégie » : du 12ᵉ des Mile plateaux sur la « machine de guerre », nous dégageons le concept de « pure stratégie » qui distingue les deux stratégies au niveau du concept de stratégie. Dans la Deuxième partie, la théorie gramscienne de la subalternité et du « bloc historique » est traduite en perspective guattaro-deleuzienne, si bien que nous concevons la subalternité et la minorité comme constituant un « bloc de devenir ». Il s’avère ainsi que la stratégie gramscienne est constituée par un double mouvement de l’hégémonie et du devenir-subalterne. Cette traduction nous permet de percevoir le rapport entre les deux stratégies comme une coexistence antinomique. Il y a d’abord une impossibilité d’articuler entre celles-ci : un groupe social mineur déclarerait dans la stratégie majoritaire que « nous sommes tous humains », tandis que la puissance révolutionnaire de la stratégie minoritaire consiste à affirmer que « nous ne sommes pas humains, vous ne l’êtes pas non plus, et on devient tous sauvage, animal, inhumain et moléculaire ». Toutefois, ces deux stratégies antinomiques coexistent dans les luttes actuelles des minorités contre l’axiomatique capitaliste mondiale. Enfin, Il s’agit dans la Troisième partie d’examiner les problèmes qui se posent dans cette coexistenceThis thesis attempts to examine elements of the strategy of emancipation from Deleuze and Guattari’s perspective of the minority. It is about showing how the "becoming-minoritarian" developed in A Thousand Plateaus works as a revolutionary "minoritarian strategy". Its opposite is the "majoritarian strategy" represented by the Gramscian theory of "hegemony". In order to define these two strategies and formulate their "antinomy", we first take Balibar’s reflection on "strategies of civility" as a guide for research. The thesis has three moments. The First part deals with the concept of "strategy": from the 12th Plateau of A Thousand Plateaus on the "War machine", we bring out the concept of "pure strategy" which distinguishes the two strategies in terms of the concept of strategy. In the Second part, the Gramscian theory of subalternity and the "historical bloc" is translated into the Guattaro-Deleuzian perspective, so that we conceive of subalternity and minority as constituting a "block of becoming". Thus, it turns out that Gramsci’s strategy consists of a double movement of hegemony and becoming-subaltern. This translation allows us to understand the relationship between the two strategies as an antinomic coexistence. First, there is an impossibility of articulating between them: a minor social group will declare in the majoritarian strategy that "we are all human", while a revolutionary power of the minoritarian strategy consists in asserting that "we are not human, neither are you, and we all become savage, animal, inhuman and molecular". However, these two antinomic strategies coexist in the current struggles of minorities against the world capitalist axiomatic. Finally, the Third part examines problems that arise from this coexistence
10
Nail, Thomas. "Returning to Revolution: Deleuze, Guattari, and Zapatismo." Thesis, University of Oregon, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/12569.
Full textAbstract:
249 pagesWe are witnessing today the beginning of a return to and renewal of the theory and practice of political revolution. This return to revolution, however, takes none of the traditional forms: the capture of the state, the political representation of the party, the centrality of the proletariat, or the leadership of the vanguard. Rather, given the failure of such tactics over the last century, coupled with the socio-economic changes brought by neoliberalism in the 1980s, revolutionary strategy has developed in a more heterogenous and non-representational direction. The aim of this dissertation is to map an outline of this new direction by drawing on the theory and practice of two of its main inspirations: French political philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari and, what the New York Times has called “the first post-modern revolution,” the 1994 Zapatista Uprising in Chiapas, Mexico. The aim of this dissertation is thus threefold. First, I provide a philosophical clarification and outline of a revolutionary strategy that both describes and advances the process of constructing real alternatives to state-capitalism. Second, I focus on three influential and emblematic figures of revolutionary history, mutually disclosive of one another, as well as this larger revolutionary return: Deleuze, Guattari, and the Zapatistas. Third, and more specifically, I propose four novel theoretical practices that characterize this return to revolution: (1) a multi-centered diagnostic of political power; (2) a prefigurative theory of political transformation; (3) a participatory theory of the body politic; and (4) a theory of political belonging based on mutual global solidarity.
Books on the topic "Guattari"
1
Berardi, Franco. Félix Guattari. Edited by Giuseppina Mecchia and Charles J. Stivale. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488.
Full text
2
Guattari, Félix. The Guattari reader. Oxford, OX, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Find full text
3
The Guattari effect. London: Continuum, 2011.
Find full text
4
Gary, Genosko, ed. Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge, 2001.
Find full text
5
Gary, Genosko, ed. Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge, 2001.
Find full text
6
Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge, 1989.
Find full text
7
J, Stivale Charles, ed. Deleuze and Guattari. Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1991.
Find full text
8
1964-, Herzogenrath Bernd, ed. Deleuze/Guattari & ecology. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Find full text
9
Bogue, Ronald. Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge, 1989.
Find full text
10
Buchanan, Ian, K. George Varghese, and N. Y. Manoj. Deleuze, Guattari and India. London: Routledge India, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003217336.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Guattari"
1
Berressem, Hanjo. "Guattari, Félix." In Metzler Philosophen Lexikon, 332–35. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03642-1_116.
Full text
2
Sanders, Olaf. "Deleuze/Guattari." In International Handbook of Philosophy of Education, 103–14. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_10.
Full text
3
Berardi, Franco. "Introduction: Cartographies in Becoming." In Félix Guattari, 1–5. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488_1.
Full text
4
Berardi, Franco. "The Tantric Egg." In Félix Guattari, 109–12. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488_10.
Full text
5
Berardi, Franco. "Chaosmosis." In Félix Guattari, 113–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488_11.
Full text
6
Berardi, Franco. "The Provisional Eternity of Friendship." In Félix Guattari, 134–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488_12.
Full text
7
Berardi, Franco. "Interview with Franco Berardi (Bifo)." In Félix Guattari, 141–68. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488_13.
Full text
8
Berardi, Franco. "The Happy Depression." In Félix Guattari, 9–15. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488_2.
Full text
9
Berardi, Franco. "Integrated World Capitalism." In Félix Guattari, 16–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488_3.
Full text
10
Berardi, Franco. "Planetary Psychopathology." In Félix Guattari, 22–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584488_4.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Guattari"
1
Messias Coutinho Meira, Manoel, MARILIA AGUIAR RODRIGUES, Lara de Oliveira Carvalho, and Grasiele de Oliveira Cruz. "O Ecofeminismo na perspectiva de Félix Guattari." In XVII Encontro Nacional de Estudantes de Engenharia Ambiental e V Fórum Latino-Americano de Engenharia e Sustentabilidade. Recife, Brasil: Even3, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.29327/15304.17-160738.
Full text
2
Tosel, Natascia. "THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AS UTOPIA IN DELEUZE AND GUATTARI." In SGEM 2014 Scientific SubConference on ANTHROPOLOGY, ARCHAEOLOGY, HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY. Stef92 Technology, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2014/b31/s11.112.
Full text
3
Gatti, Daniela, and Aline Silva Brasil. "“O Corpo-Lugar”: revisitações através de Deleuze e Guattari." In XXIII Congresso de Iniciação Científica da Unicamp. Campinas - SP, Brazil: Galoá, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.19146/pibic-2015-36978.
Full text
4
Rodríguez Arias, Ángel Manuel, and Ji Yeon Kim. "For Eternity; metodología de un proyecto de arte público." In V Congreso Internacional de Investigacion en Artes Visuales ANIAV 2022. RE/DES Conectar. València: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/aniav2022.2022.15502.
Full textAbstract:
Estableciendo un vínculo entre la perdurabilidad del plástico y su impacto ambiental con el entorno; esta práctica artística señala, a través de la imagen en el espacio público, el concepto de eternidad. A raíz de un análisis experimental del término, se enfoca en aplicar la ética de la sostenibilidad y su necesidad de ser implementada en el ámbito científico y social. Siguiendo la premisa de Guattari dentro de su definición de la ecosofía (Guattari, 1996), las disciplinas subyacentes a crear una bioética pasan por un saber transversal, en el que el medio ambiente se configure a través del estudio de la sociedad y su subjetividad. En este sentido, planteamos For Eternity como una necesidad de pararse a ver, y más dentro de un lugar como la universidad, el detritus que generamos y como éste afecta al entorno.Este proyecto ha sido expuesto en la muestra Art Public / Universitat Pública 2021. De este modo, se plantea esta comunicación en el congreso ANIAV como un análisis metodológico de las distintas fases del proceso artístico; incidiendo en la relación de sostenibilidad con el arte público.
5
González-Diez, Miguel. "POUCH. De un trayecto por el socious, la psique y la "naturaleza" o De los nuevos modos de vida humanos." In III Congreso Internacional de Investigación en Artes Visuales :: ANIAV 2017 :: GLOCAL. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/aniav.2017.4576.
Full textAbstract:
Dice Olafur Eliasson que “no estamos simplemente en el mundo; somos del mundo”. Y admitiendo este hecho se admite que las acciones humanas tienen consecuencias para el contexto local y global. El proyecto POUCH de Umasensio, y comisariado por Miguel González-Diez, que se completa con su serie En casa, reivindica la práctica perceptiva como forma de exploración de otros modos de conocer el mundo y de sensibilizarse estéticamente con un equilibrio ecosistémico. La artista evidencia la naturaleza y el cuerpo como aquellos únicos lugares en los que es posible darse el habitar. El cuerpo sintiente sensible surge como un elemento desde el cual alcanzar cuestiones fundamentales en el ser humano como la identidad, la empatía, la alienación y la inestabilidad. La Tierra vive un instante de desequilibrio ecológico que amenaza la vida sobre su superficie. Quizás se deba a que los modos de vida humanos afrontan en su avance un estado de fatiga continua. La cuestión es, tal como la plantea Félix Guattari, saber cómo “se va a vivir de aquí en adelante sobre este planeta [de manera sostenibles], en el contexto de la aceleración de las mutaciones técnico-científicas y del considerable crecimiento demográfico”. Guattari propone un conocimiento ecosófico proyectado a través de tres registros ecológicos: el de las relaciones sociales, el de la subjetividad humana y el del medio ambiente. De este modo surgen nuevos sistemas de valorización alejados de las retribuciones financieras y del mercado basado en el beneficio, bajo los cuales [re]crear permanentemente la identidad del mundo, pensándose transversalmente las relaciones de naturaleza y cultura. POUCH se articula en última instancia como un diálogo entre el pensamiento ecosófico y la práctica artística contemporánea desde un enfoque holístico, intercultural y laico, que supone una posible abertura para el individuo ensombrecido bajo las alienantes furias de los mercados capitalistas.http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/ANIAV.2017.4576
6
Li, Yichen. "The Transformation of Design Strategy for Triple Ecological Methodology of Smart City." In 15th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2024). AHFE International, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005343.
Full textAbstract:
Since the concept of smart city was launched in 2008, the development of smart city in China has made great breakthroughs, but there are still problems in the development. The current interpretation and research of smart city mostly focus on technology application and top-level design, which is insufficient from the perspective of humanities and social sciences. This paper does not adopt the current mainstream view of technology application regarding smart city issues, or the perspective of top-level design operability under government governance objectives. Instead, it reinterprets the philosophical dimensions from the perspective of humanistic and social ethics. Before the research, this paper conducts an analysis of the current situation of China's smart cities and theoretical reflection on this. The research is divided into two aspects: 1. Trace and analyze of the ecological philosophy of Pierre-Félix Guattari: The philosophical perspective of triple ecology is an important assertion for the current development of society and capitalist globalization, which is directly related to the issue of sustainable development. This paper introduces the philosophical concept of triple ecology of Guattari as a perspective in the field of smart city research and analyzes its triple characteristics. 2. Research on strategy application: It refers to research on strategic application of triple ecological methodology, with individual practice in China, From the perspective of contemporary ecological crisis, this paper systematically reflects on the current development of smart cities regarding value and ethics, critically corrects the development, and points out the possibility of practical connection. By reshaping the concept of philosophical perspective of triple ecology at the methodological level, this paper proposes a triple ecological philosophical design strategy of "strategic research in the context of environmental ecology", "strategic research in the context of social ecology" and "strategic research in the context of individual spiritual ecology".
7
Garcia, Natalí Abreu, Rodrigo Reis Rodrigues, Karine de Mello Freire, and Carlo Franzato. "The production of subjectivities and design from the Three Ecologies." In SDS 2023 - IX SIMPÓSIO DE DESIGN SUSTENTÁVEL. Grupo de Pesquisa Virtuhab/UFSC, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.29183/978-65-00-87779-3.sds2023.p39-50.
Full textAbstract:
This paper proposes the presentation of the concept ‘production of subjectivities’ as a premise for the development of new design attitudes aimed at regeneration, in which socio-environmental issues are fundamental. A critique of design will be articulated with the notion of production of subjectivity, pointing to Ecosophy, an ethical-aesthetic-political paradigm proposed by Félix Guattari, as a framework for the theoretical-methodological development of regenerative design processes. Finally, a case will be presented where these methodological perspectives were tried out in design processes. As a result, we identified that this paradigm was fundamental for the development of meta-project reflection, more than project solutions. And from these reflections emerged critical productions in the form of manifestos that would serve as the necessary catalyst for the regeneration not only of the territory but of the subjectivities and social relations involved.
8
Cebral Loureda, Manuel. "herm3TIC-tv: Prototype of a human and social sciences laboratory based on Deleuze-Guattari philosophy and the application of the new ICT." In XXII CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DA SOCIEDADE IBEROAMERICANA DE GRÁFICA DIGITAL. São Paulo: Editora Blucher, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5151/sigradi2018-1301.
Full text
9
Ladeira, Anariá Reis Simões, and Igor Guatelli. "Pequenas ações de interdição e expulsão no território: [tecno] ideologias de metas políticas e sociais." In V JORNADA DISCENTE DO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO - FAU MACKENZIE. Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2238-5037.20210002.
Full textAbstract:
Territórios controlados por Estados estão sujeitos a estriamentos apriorísticos por meio de normatizações genéricas para poder assim ordená-los e facilitar eventuais interdições. Em contraponto, há a possibilidade de alisamentos destes mesmos espaços, tornando-os disponíveis a apropriações imprevistas. Estamos diante de uma dualidade entre dominação e espontaneidade, entre os aparelhos de captura e as máquinas de guerra, pares heterônimos de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari. Juntamente a uma lógica urbana hostil, que evidencia o hóspede indesejável e marca os territórios com autoridade, opressão, regras e segregação – através de pequenas ações de inibição e coerção territorial por meio de leis, atos e arquiteturas hostis –, também há os espaços de hospitalidade, receptáculos abertos e lugares acolhedores que dão sempre lugar ao outro, ao qualquer outro – tal como a Khôra, segundo Jacques Derrida –, e que ressaltam o direito à vida e os enfrentamentos a esses estriamentos. Amparado por estes conceitos, evidenciam-se territorializações construídas pela antinomia entre a imposição de controle, a partir do poder e medo, e a chance de acolhimentos constituidores de insondáveis compartilhamentos.
10
Huerta Ramón, Ricard. "Disidencias sexuales, estéticas Museari, procesos críticos en el aula y ritos online mediante el proyecto Arteari." In IV Congreso Internacional Estética y Política: Poéticas del desacuerdo para una democracia plural. València: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/cep4.2019.10538.
Full textAbstract:
El potencial del entorno online para impulsar políticas culturales e innovaciones educativas está en conexión con nuestra habilidad para redefinir las relaciones entre la escuela, el museo y la universidad (Sancho, Hernández y Rivera, 2016). Por su parte, el arte contemporáneo y la educación artística están tomando una deriva social que tiene entre sus frentes más activos la lucha por los derechos humanos (Deleuze y Guattari, 2004). Conscientes de la necesidad de implicarnos en estos avances de orden tecnológico y de equilibrio social, se creó Museari, un museo online en el que se desarrollan proyectos para mejorar la situación de los colectivos LGTB, coordinando actividades a través del arte, la historia y la educación. Museari utiliza el ciberespacio para crear redes entre profesorado y alumnado, defendiendo la diversidad (Huerta, 2016). Como museo de arte contemporáneo presenta imágenes y recursos que servirán para atender cuestiones vinculadas a las culturas disidentes, ofreciendo al colectivo docente herramientas adecuadas. En esta línea de trabajo nació el proyecto Arteari. Museari pone en tela de juicio el propio concepto de museo. Precisamente ahora que se está debatiendo por parte de ICOM la nueva definición de museo, desentrañamos algunas cuestiones que parecían evidentes: ¿Quién puede crear o tener un museo?, ¿Quién accede al arte contemporáneo? Auscultamos la relación entre el museo y sus opciones educativas, favoreciendo una interacción de carácter interseccional (Huerta, 2019). Apostamos por la investigación, tanto artística como educativa. Reivindicamos desde lo académico cuestiones que afectan al panorama social, incidiendo en el respeto hacia la diversidad sexual. Atendemos de modo particular las necesidades del colectivo docente. Mientras las grandes multinacionales de la información y la comunicación compiten por reestructurar las novedades en base a criterios básicamente comerciales y de calado economicista, las voces peculiares nos devuelven el entusiasmo mediante escenarios alternativos y comprometidos con las problemáticas acuciantes. En esta línea de creación de entornos culturales innovadores Museari se convierte en un espacio accesible, peculiar, curioso, de entidad activista, un entorno apto para generar reflexiones estéticas y educativas. Además, Museari atiende a las dudas que surgen entre el colectivo docente cuando se abordan temáticas LGTB en el aula. Museari nació por iniciativa de dos profesores universitarios activistas LGTB. Parte de un compromiso que ya no puede entenderse únicamente desde la implicación. Optamos por formar e informar mediante la sensibilización, activando también espacios de reflexión (Patiño, 2017). El modelo combina colección permanente, exposiciones temporales y noticias, impulsando la interactividad con los públicos. Referencias Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (2004). Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Valencia: Pre-Textos. Huerta, R. (2016). Transeducar. Arte, docencia y derechos lgtb. Barcelona: Egales. Huerta, R. (2019). Arte para primaria. Barcelona: UOC. Patiño, A. (2017). Todas las pantallas encendidas. Hacia una resistencia creativa de la mirada. Madrid: Fórcola. Sancho, J., Hernández, F. y Rivera, P. (2016). Visualidades contemporáneas, ciudadanía y sabiduría digital: Afrontar las posibilidades sin eludir las tensiones, Relatec Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 15, 2.