Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Greenhouse gas mitigation Victoria / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Greenhouse gas mitigation Victoria'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Greenhouse gas mitigation Victoria.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 10 December 2022

Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Greenhouse gas mitigation Victoria.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Sharma, S., P. Cook, T. Berly, and C. Anderson. "AUSTRALIA’S FIRST GEOSEQUESTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT—THE CO2CRC OTWAY BASIN PILOT PROJECT." APPEA Journal 47, no. 1 (2007): 259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/aj06017.

Full text

Abstract:

Geological sequestration is a promising technology for reducing atmospheric emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) with the potential to geologically store a significant proportion Australia of Australia’s stationary CO2 emissions. Stationary emissions comprise almost 50% (or about 280 million tonnes of CO2 per annum) of Australia’s total greenhouse gas emissions. Australia has abundant coal and gas resources and extensive geological storage opportunities; it is therefore well positioned to include geosequestration as an important part of its portfolio of greenhouse gas emission mitigation technologies.The Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies is undertaking a geosequestration demonstration project in the Otway Basin of southwest Victoria, with injection of CO2 planned to commence around mid 2007. The project will extract natural gas containing a high percentage of CO2 from an existing gas well and inject it into a nearby depleted natural gas field for long-term storage. The suitability of the storage site has been assessed through a comprehensive risk assessment process. About 100,000 tonnes of CO2 is expected to be injected through a new injection well during a one- to two-year period. The injection of CO2 will be accompanied by a comprehensive monitoring and verification program to understand the behaviour of the CO2 in the subsurface and determine if the injected carbon dioxide has migrated out of the storage reservoir into overlying formations. This project will be the first storage project in Australia and the first in the world to test monitoring for storage in a depleted gas reservoir. Baseline data pertinent to geosequestration is already being acquired through the project and the research will enable a better understanding of long-term reactive transport and trapping mechanisms.This project is being authorised under the Petroleum Act 1998 (Victoria) and research, development and demonstration provisions administered by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Victoria in the absence of geosequestration- specific legislation. This highlights the need for such legislation to enable commercial-scale projects to proceed. Community acceptance is a key objective for the project and a consultation plan based on social research has been put in place to gauge public understanding and build support for the technology as a viable mitigation mechanism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Bush, Susan. "Greenhouse gas mitigation studied." Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 72, no. 27 (July 2, 1991): 290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/eo072i027p00290.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Wilkinson, Sara. "Building approval data and the quantification of sustainability over time." Structural Survey 33, no. 2 (May 11, 2015): 92–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ss-02-2015-0009.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose – The fifth IPCC report on climate change concluded current progress to mitigate anthropocentric climate change is not making any impact. As the built environment emits 50 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions, mitigating climate change through sustainable construction and adaptation is a priority. Although many new buildings have sustainability ratings, they comprise a minute amount of the total stock. Meanwhile policy makers are adopting strategies to become carbon neutral with targets that require measurement. The purpose of this paper is to propose a means of quantifying the uptake of sustainability across all stock over time using existing policy frameworks. Design/methodology/approach – Given that this is a scoping study to explore the potential to adapt existing frameworks to facilitate the quantification of the uptake of sustainability measures over time, the research adopted a focus group technique with experienced stakeholders in Australia and England. Qualitative research is inductive and hypothesis generating. That is; as the research assimilates knowledge and information contained in the literature ideas and questions are formed, which are put to research participants and from this process conclusions are drawn. Findings – It is technologically feasible to collect data on sustainability measures within the building approvals systems in Victoria and NSW Australia and England and Wales and a conceptual model is proposed. Economically, costs need to be covered, and it is unclear which group should pay. Socially, the benefits would be to determine how society is progressing towards goals. The benefits of achieving reduced carbon emissions would be mitigation of the predicted changes to climate and informing society of progress. Politically, it is unlikely there is a will to make provisions for this proposal in existing regulatory systems. Research limitations/implications – The key limitations of the research were that the views expressed are those of a select group of experienced practitioners and may not represent the consensus view of the professions and industry as a whole. The limitations and criticisms of focus group data collection are that the sessions may be dominated by individuals holding strong views. Practical implications – The findings show that adaptation of the existing data collected by building control authorities could allow some quantification of the uptake of sustainability measures over time. A simple initial system could be implemented with relative ease to ascertain the value of the data. Over time the system could be extended to collect more data that could facilitate more precise quantification of sustainability. Significantly policy makers would have a tool that would allow them to measure the success or otherwise of mandatory and voluntary measures introduced to increase the uptake of sustainability. Originality/value – To date, no one has considered the practicality or potential utility of adapting existing information gathered for building approval purposes for the quantification of the up-take of sustainability across the whole stock over time. The value of using building approval data are that all building types are required to have building approvals prior to work being undertaken.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Smith, Pete, Daniel Martino, Zucong Cai, Daniel Gwary, Henry Janzen, Pushpam Kumar, Bruce McCarl, et al. "Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363, no. 1492 (September 6, 2007): 789–813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2184.

Full text

Abstract:

Agricultural lands occupy 37% of the earth's land surface. Agriculture accounts for 52 and 84% of global anthropogenic methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Agricultural soils may also act as a sink or source for CO 2 , but the net flux is small. Many agricultural practices can potentially mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the most prominent of which are improved cropland and grazing land management and restoration of degraded lands and cultivated organic soils. Lower, but still significant mitigation potential is provided by water and rice management, set-aside, land use change and agroforestry, livestock management and manure management. The global technical mitigation potential from agriculture (excluding fossil fuel offsets from biomass) by 2030, considering all gases, is estimated to be approximately 5500–6000 Mt CO 2 -eq. yr −1 , with economic potentials of approximately 1500–1600, 2500–2700 and 4000–4300 Mt CO 2 -eq. yr −1 at carbon prices of up to 20, up to 50 and up to 100 US$ t CO 2 -eq. −1 , respectively. In addition, GHG emissions could be reduced by substitution of fossil fuels for energy production by agricultural feedstocks (e.g. crop residues, dung and dedicated energy crops). The economic mitigation potential of biomass energy from agriculture is estimated to be 640, 2240 and 16 000 Mt CO 2 -eq. yr −1 at 0–20, 0–50 and 0–100 US$ t CO 2 -eq. −1 , respectively.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Lowe, Ian. "Greenhouse gas mitigation: Policy options." Energy Conversion and Management 37, no. 6-8 (June 1996): 741–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(95)00249-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Lowe, I. "Greenhouse gas mitigation: Policy options." Fuel and Energy Abstracts 37, no. 3 (May 1996): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-6701(96)89133-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Kebreab, Ermias, Mallory Honan, Breanna Roque, and Juan Tricarico. "245 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation Strategies." Journal of Animal Science 99, Supplement_3 (October 8, 2021): 195–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab235.353.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Livestock production contributed 3.9% to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emission from the US in 2018. Most studies to mitigate GHG from livestock are focused on enteric methane because it contributes about 70% of all livestock GHG emissions. Mitigation options can be broadly categorized into dietary and rumen manipulation. Enteric methane emissions are strongly correlated to dry matter intake and somewhat sensitive to diet composition. Dietary manipulation methods include increasing feed digestibility, such as concentrate to forage ratio, or increasing fats and oils, which are associated with lower methane emissions. These reduce digestible fiber that are positively related to methane production and more energy passing the rumen without being degraded, respectively. Rumen manipulation through feed additives can be further classified based on the mode of action: 1. rumen environment modifiers indirectly affecting emissions and 2. direct methanogenesis inhibitors. The rumen environment modifiers act on the conditions that promote methanogenesis. These include ionophores, plant bioactive compounds such as essential oils and tannins, and nitrate rich feeds that serve as alternative hydrogen sinks and directly compete with methanogens thereby reducing methane emissions. The inhibitor category include 3-nitroxypropanol and seaweeds containing halogenated compounds. The former was reported to reduce enteric methane emissions (g/d) by 39% in dairy and 22% in beef cattle. Seaweed, in particular Asparagopsis spp., reduced emissions intensity (g/kg milk) by up to 67% in dairy and emissions yield (g/kg dry matter intake) by up to 98% in beef cattle. Because inhibitors are structural analogs of methane, their mode of action is through competitive inhibition of the methyl transfer reaction catalyzed by methyl coenzyme-M reductase, the last enzyme in methanogenesis. The combination of dietary and rumen manipulation options, including feed additives, is expected to reduce enteric methane emissions by over 30% in the next decade without compromising animal productivity and health.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Burney, J. A., S. J. Davis, and D. B. Lobell. "Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, no. 26 (June 15, 2010): 12052–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914216107.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

MICHAELIS, L. "Sustainable consumption and greenhouse gas mitigation." Climate Policy 3 (November 2003): S135—S146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Petersen, S. O., M. Blanchard, D. Chadwick, A. Del Prado, N. Edouard, J. Mosquera, and S. G. Sommer. "Manure management for greenhouse gas mitigation." Animal 7 (2013): 266–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1751731113000736.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Sokolov, Vera, Andrew VanderZaag, Jermaneh Habtewold, Kari Dunfield, Claudia Wagner‐Riddle, Jason J. Venkiteswaran, and Robert Gordon. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation through Dairy Manure Acidification." Journal of Environmental Quality 48, no. 5 (July 18, 2019): 1435–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.10.0355.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Smith, Pete. "Global greenhouse gas mitigation potential in agriculture." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 6, no. 24 (February 1, 2009): 242001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/6/24/242001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Reck, Ruth A., and Katherine J. Hoag. "A comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options." Energy 22, no. 2-3 (February 1997): 115–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(96)00108-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Jones, Ian S. F., and D. Otaegui. "Photosynthetic greenhouse gas mitigation by ocean nourishment." Energy Conversion and Management 38 (January 1997): S367—S372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0196-8904(96)00296-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

RAMANATHAN, R. "Selection of appropriate greenhouse gas mitigation options." Global Environmental Change 9, no. 3 (October 1999): 203–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-3780(98)00039-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

STEINBERG, M. "Fossil fuel and greenhouse gas mitigation technologies." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 19, no. 8 (August 1994): 659–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(94)90150-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Steinberg, Meyer. "History of CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation technologies." Energy Conversion and Management 33, no. 5-8 (May 1992): 311–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(92)90025-r.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Soto Veiga, João Paulo, and Thiago Libório Romanelli. "Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions using exergy." Journal of Cleaner Production 260 (July 2020): 121092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121092.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Pathak, Himanshu. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation in Agriculture." Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 5, no. 4 (August 2015): 357–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1528.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Roehrl, R. Alexander, and Keywan Riahi. "Technology Dynamics and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 63, no. 2-3 (February 2000): 231–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1625(99)00112-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Azad, Abdul-Majeed, Eric McDaniel, and Sirhan Al-batty. "A novel paradigm in greenhouse gas mitigation." Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 30, no. 4 (November 9, 2010): 733–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.10515.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Trikam, A. "Greenhouse gas mitigation options in the industrial sector." South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 5, no. 2 (June 30, 2002): 473–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v5i2.2686.

Full text

Abstract:

This report identifies the major opportunities for climate change mitigation through industrial energy efficiency and fuel switching in South Africa. The potential for greenhouse gas reduction (outlining areas of possible resultant CDM investment) in local industry, a CO2 mitigation cost curve and accounting of emissions reductions in existing and future industrial plants, will provide the basis for realising these opportunities. Greenhouse gas mitigation in the industrial sector is closely linked with 2 groups: energy efficiency improvements and fuel switching; and these options are outlined in more detail in this report.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

van Ruijven, Bas, and Detlef P. van Vuuren. "Oil and natural gas prices and greenhouse gas emission mitigation." Energy Policy 37, no. 11 (November 2009): 4797–808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.037.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Shimin. "GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR CONTAINER SHIPPING INDUSTRY." American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 5, no. 4 (April 1, 2012): 310–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2012.310.317.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Meyer-Aurich, Andreas, and Yusuf Nadi Karatay. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Costs of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer." Agriculture 12, no. 9 (September 10, 2022): 1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091438.

Full text

Abstract:

The reduction of nitrogen (N) fertilizer use is a possible greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation option, whereas cost estimation highly depends on assumptions of the yield response function. This paper analyzes the potential and range of GHG mitigation costs with reduced N fertilizer application based on empirical yield response data for winter rye (Secale cereale L.) and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) from field experiments from 2013 to 2020 in Brandenburg, Germany. The field experiments included four to five N rates as mineral fertilizer treatments. Three different functional forms (linear-plateau, quadratic, and quadratic-plateau) were estimated to model yield response as a function of N supply. Economic calculations were based on relevant price–cost ratios. The results indicate that the opportunity costs of applying less fertilizer and the resulting GHG mitigation thereof vary in a great range across the years and crops estimated by different yield response functions. The linear-plateau function predominantly results in lower GHG mitigation costs than the quadratic and the quadratic-plateau function. On average, over eight years, a moderate reduction of N fertilizer (up to 20 kg/ha) offers a cost-efficient option for mitigating GHG emissions below EUR 50 per ton of CO2eq, even resulting in net profit gain in some cases.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: The Biology of Carbon Sequestration." BioScience 52, no. 4 (2002): 323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0323:ggmtbo]2.0.co;2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Follett, Ronald F. "Symposium: Soil Carbon Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation." Soil Science Society of America Journal 74, no. 2 (March 2010): 345–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.cseqghgsymp.intro.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Warner, Douglas, John Tzilivakis, Andrew Green, and Kathleen Lewis. "Prioritising agri-environment options for greenhouse gas mitigation." International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 9, no. 1 (January 9, 2017): 104–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-04-2015-0048.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose This paper aims to assess agri-environment (AE) scheme options on cultivated agricultural land in England for their impact on agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It considers both absolute emissions reduction and reduction incorporating yield decrease and potential production displacement. Similarities with Ecological Focus Areas (EFAs) introduced in 2015 as part of the post-2014 Common Agricultural Policy reform, and their potential impact, are considered. Design/methodology/approach A life-cycle analysis approach derives GHG emissions for 18 key representative options. Meta-modelling is used to account for spatial environmental variables (annual precipitation, soil type and erosion risk), supplementing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodology. Findings Most options achieve an absolute reduction in GHG emissions compared to an existing arable crop baseline but at the expense of removing land from production, risking production displacement. Soil and water protection options designed to reduce soil erosion and nitrate leaching decrease GHG emissions without loss of crop yield. Undersown spring cereals support decreased inputs and emissions per unit of crop yield. The most valuable AE options identified are included in the proposed EFAs, although lower priority is afforded to some. Practical implications Recommendations are made where applicable to modify option management prescriptions and to further reduce GHG emissions. Originality/value This research is relevant and of value to land managers and policy makers. A dichotomous key summarises AE option prioritisation and supports GHG mitigation on cultivated land in England. The results are also applicable to other European countries.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Herrero, Mario, Benjamin Henderson, Petr Havlík, Philip K. Thornton, Richard T. Conant, Pete Smith, Stefan Wirsenius, et al. "Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector." Nature Climate Change 6, no. 5 (March 21, 2016): 452–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2925.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Biilgen, S., S. Keles, and K. Kaygusuz. "The Role of Biomass in Greenhouse Gas Mitigation." Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 29, no. 13 (August 24, 2007): 1243–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00908310600623629.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Kulshreshtha, S. N., B. Junkins, and R. Desjardins. "Prioritizing greenhouse gas emission mitigation measures for agriculture." Agricultural Systems 66, no. 3 (December 2000): 145–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0308-521x(00)00041-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Weiske, Achim, and Søren O. Petersen. "Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production." Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112, no. 2-3 (February 2006): 105–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Vergé, X. P. C., C. De Kimpe, and R. L. Desjardins. "Agricultural production, greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential." Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 142, no. 2-4 (February 2007): 255–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.06.011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Wijayatunga, Priyantha D. C., W. J. L. S. Fernando, and Ram M. Shrestha. "Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation: Sri Lanka Electricity Sector." Engineer: Journal of the Institution of Engineers, Sri Lanka 39, no. 3 (July 29, 2006): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v39i3.7188.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Liu, Zifei, and Yang Liu. "Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from animal production." Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 8, no. 4 (June 11, 2018): 627–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1785.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Muench, Stefan. "Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of electricity from biomass." Journal of Cleaner Production 103 (September 2015): 483–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.082.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Minihan, Erin S., and Ziping Wu. "Economic structure and strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation." Energy Economics 34, no. 1 (January 2012): 350–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.05.011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Fahri, Ihsan, Ahmad Kurnain, Rizqi Putri Mahyudin, and Yudi Ferrianta. "Analisis Reduksi Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca Dari Pengelolaan Sampah Padat Di Kecamatan Marabahan Kabupaten Barito Kuala Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan." EnviroScienteae 15, no. 1 (April 29, 2019): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/es.v15i1.6321.

Full text

Abstract:

This study analyzes the level and status of greenhouse gas emissions or removals from solid waste management activities in Marabahan Subdistrict, Formulates an action plan for solid waste management that is low in Greenhouse Gas emissions in Marabahan Subdistrict and Projects the level and status of emissions or Greenhouse Gas absorption from waste management solid in Marabahan District until 2030, according to the 2006 IPCC BAU scenario and mitigation actions. The waste sector greenhouse gas emissions inventory results in 2016 reached 5.16 Gg CO2-eq. However, due to improvements in domestic waste management, the 2016 greenhouse gas emissions rate was reduced by 11.1% compared to the BAU scenario. In 2016, waste sector greenhouse gas emissions in the BAU scenario are projected to reach 10.61 Gg CO2-eq, and will continue to grow until 2020 to 11.14 Gg CO2-eq, and in 2030 to 12.64 Gg CO2-eq. In Action Mitigation I waste management is carried out in the community by implementing methane recovery in the waste banks and TPS 3R. In Action Mitigation II, waste management is carried out at the Final Processing Site (TPA) carried out by the local government to handle it. When compared to the BAU scenario, the design of mitigation actions I and II in the context of reducing greenhouse gas emissions resulted in a decrease of 35.2%, 59.5% and 98.3% in 2013, 2020 and 2030.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Watson, Maxwell. "CO2CRC’s carbon capture and geological storage demonstration in Victoria." Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 126, no. 2 (2014): 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/rs14016.

Full text

Abstract:

The recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report (Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis) states that ‘warming of the climate system is unequivocal’, and that ‘it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century’. The IPCC report follows a common trend attributing increasing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions as the cause of this climate change. Carbon dioxide (CO2), primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels for energy, is the most common greenhouse gas emitted by human activities. Reduction of greenhouse gas emission, particularly CO2 to the atmosphere, is therefore a key environmental issue facing Australia and the world.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Batini, Nicoletta, Oana Luca, Ian Parry, and Simon Black. "A Comprehensive Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Strategy for The Netherlands." IMF Working Papers 2021, no. 223 (August 2021): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781513593388.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Bellarby, Jessica, Reyes Tirado, Adrian Leip, Franz Weiss, Jan Peter Lesschen, and Pete Smith. "Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe." Global Change Biology 19, no. 1 (August 20, 2012): 3–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02786.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Grubb, Michael, Doug Crawford-Brown, Karsten Neuhoff, Karin Schanes, Sonja Hawkins, and Alexandra Poncia. "Consumption-oriented policy instruments for fostering greenhouse gas mitigation." Climate Policy 20, sup1 (March 19, 2020): S58—S73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1730151.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Monacrovich, Edward, Olga Pilifosova, Dmitry Danchuk, Georgy Papafanasopulo, and Nina Inozemtseva. "Estimating the potential of greenhouse gas mitigation in Kazakhstan." Environmental Management 20, S1 (January 1996): S57—S64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01204193.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Penman, James. "The United Kingdom's assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation options." Environmental Management 20, S1 (January 1996): S75—S81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01204195.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Chang, Ching-Chih, and Chia-Ling Chung. "Greenhouse gas mitigation policies in Taiwan's road transportation sectors." Energy Policy 123 (December 2018): 299–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.068.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Rao, Ashok D., and William H. Day. "Mitigation of greenhouse gases from gas turbine power plants." Energy Conversion and Management 37, no. 6-8 (June 1996): 909–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(95)00276-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Guo, Jianping, and Chaodong Zhou. "Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation measures in Chinese agroecosystems." Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 142, no. 2-4 (February 2007): 270–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.029.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Burbi, Sara, R. N. Baines, and J. S. Conway. "Achieving successful farmer engagement on greenhouse gas emission mitigation." International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 14, no. 4 (March 16, 2016): 466–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2016.1152062.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Gabe, Jeremy. "Successful greenhouse gas mitigation in existing Australian office buildings." Building Research & Information 44, no. 2 (December 3, 2014): 160–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.979034.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Cifuentes, L. "CLIMATE CHANGE: Hidden Health Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation." Science 293, no. 5533 (August 17, 2001): 1257–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1063357.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!