Journal articles: 'Governmentality'

1

Clegg, Stewart. "Governmentality." Project Management Journal 50, no. 3 (April 22, 2019): 266–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/8756972819841260.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Jazeel, Tariq. "Governmentality." Social Text 27, no. 3 (2009): 136–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01642472-2009-024.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Merlingen, Michael. "Governmentality." Cooperation and Conflict 38, no. 4 (December 2003): 361–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010836703384002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Rose, Nikolas, Pat O'Malley, and Mariana Valverde. "Governmentality." Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2, no. 1 (December 2006): 83–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Braeckman, Antoon. "Beyond the confines of the law: Foucault’s intimations of a genealogy of the modern state." Philosophy & Social Criticism 46, no. 6 (July 4, 2019): 651–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0191453719860227.

Full text

Abstract:

The general claim advanced in this article is that Foucault’s genealogy of the modern state traces two ideal-typically different power arrangements at the origin of the modern state, roughly referred to as ‘sovereign power’ and ‘governmentality’. They are ideal-typically different in that they operate according to a different logic, including different ends, means and modi operandi. The more specific claim, then, is that due to this different logic, their ever changing interpenetration on the level of the state is imbalanced. In order for ‘governmentality’ to operate according to the law, it must be backed by the juridical frameworks provided by sovereign power, but then again these juridical frameworks prove inadequate and insufficient to curb ‘governmentality’s’ operational procedures as well as the modalities and intensities of its implementation. In other words, in his genealogy of the modern state, Foucault tracks down ‘governmentality’ as a distinctive form of power which, although intertwined with the state, cannot juridically be contained by the state. It cannot be appropriately restrained by its legal regulations and, as such, constitutes an excess vis-à-vis those regulations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Scott, David. "Colonial Governmentality." Social Text, no. 43 (1995): 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/466631.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Graham, Helen. "SCALING GOVERNMENTALITY." Cultural Studies 26, no. 4 (July 2012): 565–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2012.679285.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Ashworth, Michael. "Affective Governmentality." Social & Legal Studies 26, no. 2 (September 23, 2016): 188–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0964663916666630.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Elden, Stuart. "Rethinking governmentality." Political Geography 26, no. 1 (January 2007): 29–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

De Lint, Willem. "Intelligent Governmentality." Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 26, no. 2 (October 1, 2008): 280. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4547.

Full text

Abstract:

Recently, within liberal democracies, the post-Westphalian consolidation of security and intelligence has ushered in the normalization not only of security in ‘securitization’ but also of intelligence in what is proposed here as ‘intelligencification.’ In outlining the features of intelligencified governance, my aim is to interrogate the view that effects or traces, and productivity rather than negation is as persuasive as commonly thought by the constructivists. After all, counter-intelligence is both about purging and reconstructing the archive for undisclosed values. In practice, what is being normalized is the authorized and legalized use of release and retention protocols of politically actionable information. The intelligencification of governmentality affords a sovereignty shell-game or the instrumentalization of sovereign power by interests that are dependent on, yet often inimical to, the power of state, national, and popular sovereignty.On voit le politique et le social comme dépendant de contingences exclusives. Récemment, au sein des démocraties libérales, la consolidation de la sécurité et des services de renseignements de sécurité qui a suivi les traités de la Westphalie a donné lieu à la normalisation non seulement de la sécurité en «sécurisation» mais aussi des services de renseignements de sécurité en ce qui est proposé ici comme «intelligencification» [terme anglais créé par l’auteur, dérivé du mot anglais «intelligence» dans le sens de renseignements des écurité]. En particulier, ce que l’on normalise dans le but de contourner des contingences exclusives est l’utilisation autorisée et légalisée de protocoles de communication et de rétention d’information qui, politiquement, pourrait mener à des poursuites. En esquissant les traits de la gouvernance «intelligencifiée», mon but est d’interroger le point de vue que les effets ou les traces, et la productivité plutôt que la négation, est une nomenclature plus persuasive pour l’analyse : après tout, le contre-espionnage est question à la fois de purger et de reconstruire l’archive en rapport avec des valeurs non révélées. Il en résulte que l’«intelligencification» de la gouvernementalité donne lieu à une activité déceptive par rapport à la souveraineté ou l’instrumentalisation du pouvoir souverain par des intérêts qui dépendent sur et qui sont inamicaux au pouvoir de la souveraineté étatique, nationale et certainement populaire.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Jung, Dietrich, and Kirstine Sinclair. "Religious Governmentality." Temenos - Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion 56, no. 1 (June 15, 2020): 95–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.33356/temenos.78154.

Full text

Abstract:

In this article on the role of religion in the formation of modern subjectivities we use a contemporary transnational Islamist organization, Hizb ut-Tahrir, as our example. We examine how technologies of domination are combined with norm-setting technologies of the self in shaping new modern Muslim subjectivities among its members. First, we present our theoretical perspective and analytical framework. Then we describe the ideological roots of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the intellectual universe of nineteenth-century thinking about Islamic reform. Third, we analyse the practice of tooling or processing minds, souls, convictions, physical appearance, and behaviour among members of the organization. As our major interest lies not in Hizb ut-Tahrir as such but in the role of religion in the formation of modern social subjectivities, we conclude with some general reflections on this question.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

CAWLEY, R. McGREGGOR, and WILLIAM CHALOUPKA. "American Governmentality." American Behavioral Scientist 41, no. 1 (September 1997): 28–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764297041001004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

de Vries, Pieter. "Critiquing governmentality." Focaal 2005, no. 45 (June 1, 2005): 94–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/092012905780909298.

Full text

Abstract:

This article sets out to test the Foucauldian concept of governmentality as it has been applied by social theorists working on the topic of neoliberal managerialism. It starts with a critical discussion of the 'good governance' agenda as developed by the World Bank. The question that the article poses is whether such technologies of governance are as successful in shaping new fields of intervention as assumed in the (managerial) governmentality literature. This question is answered negatively by way of a case study of an extensionist, working in an integrated rural development project in the Atlantic zone of Costa Rica, who developed his own 'participatory extension style of operation' for dealing with farmer beneficiaries. At a more theoretical level, the article takes issue with current notions regarding the malleability of the Self and the 'social'. The article concludes that the governmentality approach has perverse consequences for the anthropological project as it leads to an impoverished kind of ethnography.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Park, Sang-ho and 윤아름. "Within or Beyond Governmentality? : Neoliberal Governmentality in Snowpiercer." Journal of Foreign Studies ll, no. 32 (June 2015): 227–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.15755/jfs.2015..32.227.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Korvela, Paul-Erik. "Sources of governmentality." History of the Human Sciences 25, no. 4 (August 21, 2012): 73–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952695112454370.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Larner, Wendy, and William Walters. "Globalization as Governmentality." Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 29, no. 5 (November 2004): 495–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030437540402900502.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Zanotti, Laura. "Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology." Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 38, no. 4 (November 2013): 288–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0304375413512098.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Joseph, Jonathan. "Globalization and Governmentality." International Politics 43, no. 3 (June 26, 2006): 402–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800148.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Elden, Stuart. "Governmentality, Calculation, Territory." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25, no. 3 (June 2007): 562–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d428t.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Lippert, Randy, and Kevin Stenson. "Advancing governmentality studies." Theoretical Criminology 14, no. 4 (November 2010): 473–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362480610369328.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Dean, Mitchell. "Empire and governmentality." Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 4, no. 1 (January 2003): 111–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2003.9672849.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Urla, Jacqueline. "Governmentality and Language." Annual Review of Anthropology 48, no. 1 (October 21, 2019): 261–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050258.

Full text

Abstract:

This article reviews how the analytics of governmentality have been taken up by scholars in linguistic anthropology, sociolinguistics, and applied linguistics. It explores the distinctive logics of “linguistic governmentality” understood as techniques and forms of expertise that seek to govern, guide, and shape (rather than force) linguistic conduct and subjectivity at the level of the population or the individual. Governmentality brings new perspectives to the study of language ideologies and practices informing modernist and neoliberal language planning and policies, the technologies of knowledge they generate, and the contestations that surround them. Recent work in this vein is deepening our understanding of “language”—understood as an array of verbal and nonverbal communicative practices—as a medium through which neoliberal governmentality is exercised. The article concludes by considering how a critical sociolinguistics of governmentality can address some shortcomings in the study of governmentality and advance the study of language, power, and inequality.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Biebricher, Thomas. "Genealogy and Governmentality." Journal of the Philosophy of History 2, no. 3 (2008): 363–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187226308x336001.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe essay aims at an assessment of whether and to what extent the history of governmentality can be considered to be a genealogy. To this effect a generic account of core tenets of Foucauldian genealogy is developed. The three core tenets highlighted are (1) a radically contingent view of history that is (2) expressed in a distinct style and (3) highlights the impact of power on this history. After a brief discussion of the concept of governmentality and a descriptive summary of its history, this generic account is used as a measuring device to be applied to the history of governmentality. While both, the concept of governmentality and also its history retain certain links to genealogical precepts, my overall conclusion is that particularly the history of governmentality (and not necessarily Foucault's more programmatic statements about it) departs from these precepts in significant ways. Not only is there a notable difference in style that cannot be accounted for entirely by the fact that this history is produced in the medium of lectures. Aside from a rather abstract consideration of the importance of societal struggles, revolts and other forms of resistance, there is also little reference to the role of these phenomena in the concrete dynamics of governmental shifts that are depicted in the historical narrative. Finally, in contrast to the historical contingency espoused by genealogy and the programmatic statements about governmentality, the actual history of the latter can be plausibly, albeit unsympathetically, read in a rather teleological fashion according to which the transformations of governmentality amount to the unfolding of an initially implicit notion of governing that is subsequently realised in ever more consistent ways. In the final section of the essay I turn towards the field of governmentality studies, arguing that some of the more problematic tendencies in this research tradition can be traced back to Foucault's own account. In particular, the monolithic conceptualisation of governmentality and the implicit presentism of an excessive focus on Neoliberalism found in many of the studies in governmentality can be linked back to problems in Foucault's own history of governmenality. The paper concludes with suggestions for a future research agenda for the governmentality studies that point beyond Foucault's own account and its respective limitations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Merchant. "Immanence, Governmentality, Critique:." Philosophy & Rhetoric 47, no. 3 (2014): 227. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.47.3.0227.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Marx, John. "Literature and Governmentality." Literature Compass 8, no. 1 (January 2011): 66–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2010.00772.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Watts, Michael. "Development and Governmentality." Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24, no. 1 (March 2003): 6–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9493.00140.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Hindess, Bary. "Politics and governmentality." Economy and Society 26, no. 2 (May 1997): 257–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085149700000014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

O'Malley, Pat, Lorna Weir, and Clifford Shearing. "Governmentality, criticism, politics." Economy and Society 26, no. 4 (November 1997): 501–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085149700000026.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Marasco, Robyn. "Machiavelli contra governmentality." Contemporary Political Theory 11, no. 4 (January 10, 2012): 339–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2011.35.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Ettlinger, Nancy. "Governmentality as Epistemology." Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101, no. 3 (April 25, 2011): 537–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.544962.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Pearce, Frank, and Steve Tombs. "Foucault, Governmentality, Marxism." Social & Legal Studies 7, no. 4 (December 1998): 567–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096466399800700408.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Murdoch, Jonathan, and Nkil Ward. "Governmentality and territoriality." Political Geography 16, no. 4 (May 1997): 307–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0962-6298(96)00007-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Lövbrand, Eva, Johannes Stripple, and Bo Wiman. "Earth System governmentality." Global Environmental Change 19, no. 1 (February 2009): 7–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Lin, Zhongxuan, and Yupei Zhao. "Beyond Celebrity Politics: Celebrity as Governmentality in China." SAGE Open 10, no. 3 (July 2020): 215824402094186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941862.

Full text

Abstract:

This article investigates the crucial political dimension of celebrity. Specifically, it examines celebrities’ great potential for governmentality in the Chinese context by tracing the history of celebrities in Confucian, Maoist, and post-Maoist governmentalities. It concludes that this type of governmentality, namely, celebrity as governmentality, displays uniquely Chinese characteristics in that it is a set of knowledge, discourses, and techniques used primarily by those who govern. It also highlights the central role of the state as the concrete terrain for the application of this mode of governmentality throughout Chinese history. Finally, it notes the always evolving nature of governmentality, as observed in the phenomena of governing from afar and resistance from below. These findings help us rethink the contingent and diversified nature of the phenomena of celebrity and governmentality and challenge Western norms and political theories that covertly employ them.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Ignatjeva, Olga. "Digital governmentality: Participatory governance vs. biopolitics." Political Expertise: POLITEX 16, no. 4 (2020): 462–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2020.403.

Full text

Abstract:

The notion of governmentality was first used by the French postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault during his lectures at the College de France in 1978-1979. The term is one of the characteristics of political power, along with sovereignty and discipline, but it characterizes its later stages of evolution. Foucault and his commentators give multiple meanings to this term, but perhaps the most accurate ones are the definition of governmentality as a way of rational thinking about the realization of political power and governmentality as the art of government. The emergence of governmentality is associated with the emergence of political economy and implies the use of biopolitical techniques, a concept that Foucault introduces to emphasize the need for socio-hu- manitarian knowledge in disciplining the “political body”. Evolution and peculiarities of biopolitics are discussed in detail in this article in relation to each type of governmentality. This article examines three types of governmentality (liberalism, authoritarianism, neoliberalism) introduced by the French thinker and proposes considering a new type of governmentality that characterizes the modern stage of society’s development. Here we use a governmentality concept as a methodological instrument for analysis of a new type of governance. The author notes that digital governmentality is characterized by governance using digital platforms. The article provides a detailed description of the architecture of one such platforms, as well as a set of algorithms that will mediate the interaction between the population and government representatives. The purpose of this article is to identify the essence of digital governmentality and its nature. Is the emerging form of public governance through digital platforms, as a consequence of its digitalization, demo- cratic and participatory, or is it still a more sophisticated way of governing the population using manipulative, biopolitical strategies? An attempt to answer this question is made in the article by considering both the evolution of the term governmentality itself and the technological features of digital platforms with their interpretation based on Michel Foucault’s concept.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Hamilton, Scott. "Foucault’s End of History: The Temporality of Governmentality and its End in the Anthropocene." Millennium: Journal of International Studies 46, no. 3 (June 2018): 371–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0305829818774892.

Full text

Abstract:

Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality is widely used throughout the social sciences to analyse the state, liberalism, and individual subjectivity. Surprisingly, what remains ignored are the repeated claims made by Foucault throughout his seminal Security, Territory, Population lectures (2007) that governmentality depends more fundamentally on a specific form of time, than on the state or the subject. By paying closer attention to Foucault’s comments on political temporality, this article reveals that governmentality emerged from, and depends upon, a very specific cosmological order that experiences time as indefinite: what Foucault calls our modern ‘indefinite governmentality’. This is elaborated here in three ways. First, by reviewing the transformation from a linear Christian cosmology to our modern indefinite governmentality through what Foucault calls the ‘de-governmentalization of the cosmos’. Second, by arguing that our experience of indefinite temporality was concretised by the geological discovery of ‘deep time’. Third, by engaging a contemporary geological concept that returns humanity to its lost cosmological centrality, thereby re-governing the cosmos: the Anthropocene, or the ‘human epoch’. Analysed using indefinite governmentality, Foucault’s forewarning of an ‘end of history’ is implicit in the new concept of the Anthropocene’s origins and ends. If it is the paradigm shift its proponents claim, then it threatens to end the temporality of the state, the subject, and governmentality itself.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Aditya, Nayak. "Boredom, Time-Perception and Algorithmic Governmentality." Journal of AI Humanities 7 (April 30, 2021): 11–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.46397/jaih.7.1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Lubrano, Linda Lucia. "Governmentality through Science Communities." International Journal of Science in Society 2, no. 4 (2011): 33–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.18848/1836-6236/cgp/v02i04/51283.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Dammann, Finn, Christian Eichenmüller, and Georg Glasze. "Geographies of “digital governmentality”." Digital Geography and Society 3 (2022): 100034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100034.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Bohle, Johannes. "Hurricane-riskscapes and governmentality." Erdkunde 72, no. 2 (June 18, 2018): 125–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2018.02.04.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Grieveson, L. "On governmentality and screens." Screen 50, no. 1 (March 1, 2009): 180–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjn079.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Miller, Hugh T. "Governmentality, Pluralism, and Deconstruction." Administrative Theory & Praxis 30, no. 3 (January 2008): 363–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2008.11029651.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Neumann, Iver B., and Ole Jacob Sending. "`The International' as Governmentality." Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35, no. 3 (September 2007): 677–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298070350030201.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Walters, William, and Jens Henrik Haahr. "governmentality and political studies." European Political Science 4, no. 3 (August 19, 2005): 288–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210038.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Binkley, Sam. "Governmentality and Lifestyle Studies." Sociology Compass 1, no. 1 (July 18, 2007): 111–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00011.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

CARRABINE, EAMONN. "Discourse, Governmentality and Translation:." Theoretical Criminology 4, no. 3 (August 2000): 309–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362480600004003004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Oksala, Johanna. "Violence and Neoliberal Governmentality." Constellations 18, no. 3 (September 2011): 474–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2011.00646.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Binkley, Sam. "Governmentality, Temporality and Practice." Time & Society 18, no. 1 (March 2009): 86–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961463x08099945.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

May, Todd. "Power in Neoliberal Governmentality." Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 43, no. 1 (January 2012): 45–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2012.11006756.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Lemke, Thomas. "Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique." Rethinking Marxism 14, no. 3 (September 2002): 49–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Governmentality'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles