Journal articles: 'Gintis'

1

Mauro Gallegati. "Herbert “Ulysses” Gintis." Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 2, no. 1 (2018): 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.26613/esic.2.1.68.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kennedy, David P. "Disciplinary stereotypes and reinventing the wheel on culture." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, no. 1 (February 2007): 31–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0700074x.

Full text

Abstract:

Gintis argues that disciplinary models of human behavior are incompatible. However, his depiction of the discipline of anthropology relies on a broad generalization that is not supported by current practice. Gintis also ignores the work of cognitive anthropologists, who have developed theories and methods that are highly compatible with the perspective advocated by Gintis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Glass, Gene V. "School Choice." education policy analysis archives 2 (February 20, 1994): 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v2n6.1994.

Full text

Abstract:

Eighteen educators and scholars discuss vouchers as a means of promoting school choice and introducing competition into education. The discussion centers around the thinking of the economist Herbert Gintis, who participated in the discussion, and his notion of market socialism as it might apply to education. In 1976, Gintis published, with Samuel Bowles, Schooling in Capitalist America; in 1994, he is arguing for competitive markets for the delivery of schooling.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Thompson, Frank. "Bowles and Gintis and Political Economic Explanation." Politics & Society 18, no. 2 (June 1990): 279–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003232929001800208.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Hammond, Kenneth R. "Gintis meets Brunswik – but fails to recognize him." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, no. 1 (February 2007): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x07000714.

Full text

Abstract:

With a few incisive (and legitimate) criticisms of crucial experiments in psychology that purported to bring down the foundations of modern economics, together with a broad scholarly review that is praiseworthy, Gintis attempts to build a unifying framework for the behavioral sciences. His efforts fail, however, because he fails to break with the conventional methodology, which, regrettably, is the unifying basis of the behavioral sciences. As a result, his efforts will merely recapitulate the story of the past: interesting, provocative results that are soon overthrown because they are limited to the conditions of the experiment. Gintis is keenly aware of this limitation – and thus meets Brunswik, but fails to recognize him; this we know because he seems unaware of the fact that Brunswik said it all – and provided a detailed defense – a half century ago.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Samuelson, Larry. "Foundations of Human Sociality: A Review Essay." Journal of Economic Literature 43, no. 2 (May 1, 2005): 488–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0022051054661549.

Full text

Abstract:

This is a review article of Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies (Oxford University Press 2004) edited by Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, and Herbert Gintis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Smith, Eric Alden. "More obstacles on the road to unification." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, no. 1 (February 2007): 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x07000830.

Full text

Abstract:

The synthesis proposed by Gintis is valuable but insufficient. Greater consideration must be given to epistemological diversity within the behavioral sciences, to incorporating historical contingency and institutional constraints on decision-making, and to vigorously testing deductive models of human behavior in real-world contexts.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Gutnyk, Vitalij. "KALTINAMOJO TEISĖS GINTIS PAČIAM APRIBOJIMAS TARPTAUTINIŲ BAUDŽIAMŲJŲ TRIBUNOLŲ PRAKTIKOJE." Teisė 91 (January 1, 2014): 31–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/teise.2014.0.3374.

Full text

Abstract:

Straipsnyje nagrinėjamas kaltinamojo teisės gintis pačiam apribojimas tarptautinių baudžiamųjų tribunolų praktikoje, kai jam paskirta teisinė pagalba be jo sutikimo. Ypatingas dėmesys skiriamas Tarptautinio baudžiamojo tribunolo buvusiai Jugoslavijai praktikai. Статья посвящена ограничению права обвиняемого на личную защиту путем предоставления назначенной правовой помощи обвиняемому без его согласия в практике международных уголовных трибуналов. Особое внимание уделено практике Международного уголовного трибунала по бывшей Югославии.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Danielson, Peter. "The place of ethics in a unified behavioral science." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, no. 1 (February 2007): 23–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x07000660.

Full text

Abstract:

Behavioral science, unified in the way Gintis proposes, should affect ethics, which also finds itself in “disarray,” in three ways. First, it raises the standards. Second, it removes the easy targets of economic and sociobiological selfishness. Third, it provides methods, in particular the close coupling of theory and experiments, to construct a better ethics.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Clarke, Steve. "Against the unification of the behavioral sciences." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, no. 1 (February 2007): 21–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x07000647.

Full text

Abstract:

The contemporary behavioral sciences are disunified and could not easily become unified, as they operate with incompatible explanatory models. According to Gintis, tolerance of this situation is “scandalous” (sect. 12). I defend the ordinary behavioral scientist's lack of commitment to a unifying explanatory model and identify several reasons why the behavioral sciences should remain disunified for the foreseeable future.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Foss, Jeffrey. "Game theory for reformation of behavioral science based on a mistake." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, no. 1 (February 2007): 24–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x07000672.

Full text

Abstract:

Gintis assumes the behavioral (=social) sciences are in disarray, and so proposes a theory for their unification. Examination of the unity of the physical sciences reveals he misunderstands the unity of science in general, and so fails to see that the social sciences are already unified with the physical sciences. Another explanation of the differences between them is outlined.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Labaree, David F., and Mike Cole. "Bowles and Gintis Revisited: Correspondence and Contradition in Educational Theory." Contemporary Sociology 18, no. 6 (November 1989): 950. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2074232.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Eckel, Catherine. "Searching for Homo Socialis: A Comment on Gintis and Helbing." Review of Behavioral Economics 2, no. 1-2 (July 29, 2015): 61–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000017.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Winter, Eyal. "Individuality and Entanglement by Herbert Gintis, Princeton University Press, 2016." Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 68 (June 2017): 140–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.01.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Roemer, John E. "A Thin Thread: Comment on Bowles' and Gintis' "Contested Exchange"." Politics & Society 18, no. 2 (June 1990): 243–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003232929001800205.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Finch, John H., and Robert McMaster. "History matters: on the mystifying appeal of Bowles and Gintis." Cambridge Journal of Economics 42, no. 2 (July 7, 2017): 285–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Blaug, Mark. "Bowles and Gintis revisited. Correspondence and contradiction in education theory." Economics of Education Review 8, no. 3 (January 1989): 297–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(82)90017-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Henrich, Joseph, and Maciej Chudek. "Understanding the research program." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35, no. 1 (January 31, 2012): 29–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11001397.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe target article misunderstands the research program it criticizes. The work of Boyd, Richerson, Fehr, Gintis, Bowles and their collaborators has long included the theoretical and empirical study of models both with and without diffuse costly punishment. In triaging the situation, we aim to (1) clarify the theoretical landscape, (2) highlight key points of agreement, and (3) suggest a more productive line of debate.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. "Rationality versus program-based behavior." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, no. 1 (February 2007): 29–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x07000726.

Full text

Abstract:

For Herbert Gintis, the “rational actor,” or “beliefs, preferences, and constraints (BPC),” model is central to his unifying framework for the behavioral sciences. It is not argued here that this model is refuted by evidence. Instead, this model relies ubiquitously on auxiliary assumptions, and is evacuated of much meaning when applied to both human and nonhuman organisms. An alternative perspective of “program-based behavior” is more consistent with evolutionary principles.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Dougherty, Kevin J. "Analyzing the Development of Education in America." Studies in American Political Development 6, no. 2 (1992): 445–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0898588x00001048.

Full text

Abstract:

Social scientists have long been interested in the development of education. Mustafa Emirbayer and Clyde Barrow, whose essays appear in this volume, have many illustrious predecessors including political scientists Ira Katznelson and Margaret Weir; economists Max Weber, Albert Fishlow, Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, and Martin Carnoy and Henry Levin; and sociologists Emile Durkheim, John Meyer, Martin Trow, Randall Collins, Joseph Ben David, Julia Wrigley, and Margaret Archer.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Palermo, Giulio. "Misconceptions of power: From Alchian and Demsetz to Bowles and Gintis." Capital & Class 31, no. 2 (July 2007): 147–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030981680709200107.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Gintis, Herbert. "Mutualism is only a part of human morality." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, no. 1 (February 2013): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x12000805.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractBaumard et al. mischaracterize our model of individual and social choice behavior. We model individuals who maximize preferences given their beliefs, and subject to their informational and material constraints (Fehr & Gintis 2007). Individuals thus must make trade-offs among self-regarding, other-regarding, and character virtue goals. Two genetic predispositions are particularly crucial. The first is strong reciprocity. The second is the capacity to internalize norms through the socialization process. Our model includes the authors' model as a subset.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Ramsay, Peter. "Book Reviews : Bowles and Gintis Revisited: Correspondence and Contradiction in Educational Theory." Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 25, no. 2 (August 1989): 318–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/144078338902500226.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Williamson, Oliver E. "Contested Exchange Versus the Governance of Contractual Relations." Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, no. 1 (February 1, 1993): 103–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.1.103.

Full text

Abstract:

There is much in the paper by Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis [“The Revenge of Homo Economicus: Contested Exchange and the Revival of Political Economy”] with which I agree. But there are also real differences—which is to be expected, since they and I examine economic organization through very different lenses. Thus whereas they view economic organization through the lens of power and contested exchange, I believe that economizing and governance is, for most purposes, a more productive perspective. I also have a variety of minor differences with their paper.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Apple, Michael W., Samuel Bowles, and Herbert Gintis. "Standing on the Shoulders of Bowles and Gintis: Class Formation and Capitalist Schools." History of Education Quarterly 28, no. 2 (1988): 231. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/368491.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Güth, Werner. "Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.: A cooperative species—human reciprocity and its evolution." Journal of Economics 104, no. 2 (August 27, 2011): 191–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0237-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Ripton, John. "Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis and Diane Ravitch: a classic controversy in education revisited." Educational Studies 18, no. 2 (January 1992): 223–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305569920180207.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Dhami, Sanjit. "Herbert Gintis. Individuality and Entanglement: The Moral and Material Bases of Human Social Life." Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 1, no. 2 (December 31, 2017): 133–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.26613/esic/1.2.56.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Ormerod, Paul. "A Comment on Gintis and Helbing “Homo Socialis: An Analytical Core for Sociological Theory”." Review of Behavioral Economics 2, no. 1-2 (July 29, 2015): 175–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000027.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Rosinger, J. L. "An elementary proof of the Bowles-Gintis-Morishima fundamental Marxian theorem with heterogeneous labour." Cambridge Journal of Economics 20, no. 6 (November 1, 1996): 779–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013650.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Cabrera, Sandra Leonor. "The Oppressive Nature of Admission Tests to Public Higher Education." INNOVA Research Journal 2, no. 6 (June 21, 2017): 94–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.33890/innova.v2.n6.2017.217.

Full text

Abstract:

Las pruebas estandarizadas al igual que otros elementos de opresión nacen, se desarrollan y se mantienen en una matriz de dominio (Collins, 2009). Debido a que el uso de las pruebas estandarizadas reproduce las jerarquías sociales y la inequidad, en este artículo analizo cómo las tres funciones de la educación democrática propuestas por John Dewey (Bowles & Gintis, 2011) se contradicen y revelan la naturaleza anti-dialógica del proceso de admisión a la universidad pública. Para el desarrollo de este argumento, incluyo una breve revisión de los orígenes de la evaluación estandarizada y discuto cómo las funciones de integración, igualdad y desarrollo no se enlazan en el discurso del sistema nacional de evaluación.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Daimah, Daimah, and Setyo Pambudi. "PENDEKATAN SOSIOLOGI DALAM KAJIAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM." Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 9, no. 2 (November 30, 2018): 115–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.22236/jpi.v9i2.1814.

Full text

Abstract:

This article analyses the Sociology of Education that refers to the application of sociological knowledge, thinking techniques, and data collection in educational investigations. The sociology of education studies the process of education as social interaction, school as a social group, and as a social institution. Sociological analysis models of education include 4 types of analysis, (1) analysis of functional structural models with characters Emile Durkeim and Talcott Parsons, (2) analysis of conflict models with characters S. Bowles and H. Gintis and Louis Althuser, (3) analysis the critical sociology model with its characters Paulo Freire and Ivan Illich and (4) Analysis of the English and US versions of Micro-level Education. Keywords: Sociology Theory, Islamic Education, Sociological analysis models, the process of education

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Tyran, Jean-Robert. "Gintis, H.: The Bounds of Reason. Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences." Journal of Economics 100, no. 2 (March 23, 2010): 185–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00712-010-0127-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

MOENE, KARL OVE, and MICHAEL WALLERSTEIN. "Redistribution of Assets Versus Redistribution of Income: Comments on “Efficient Redistribution” by Bowles and Gintis." Politics & Society 24, no. 4 (December 1996): 369–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032329296024004006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Alford, Robert R. "Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought.Samuel Bowles , Herbert Gintis." American Journal of Sociology 92, no. 6 (May 1987): 1558–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228696.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. "Herbert Gintis: The bounds of reason: Game theory and the unification of the behavioral sciences." Journal of Bioeconomics 16, no. 3 (September 4, 2013): 311–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10818-013-9164-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Thrasher, John. "Herbert Gintis, The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences." Journal of Value Inquiry 45, no. 1 (March 2011): 85–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10790-011-9265-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Camargo, Rosa Maria Bortolotti de, Gabriela Fontana Gabbi, João Loredi Lemes, and Carmen Eloísa Berlote Brenner. "Os principais autores da corrente crítico-reprodutivista." Revista Internacional de Educação Superior 3, no. 1 (April 26, 2017): 224–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.22348/riesup.v3i1.7740.

Full text

Abstract:

Este trabalho é fruto das discussões realizadas na disciplina ofertada no Curso de Mestrado em Educação “A constituição do campo educacional: entre teorias e práticas” do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação (PPGE) da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM). O objetivo é apresentar algumas das principais teorias e conceitos desenvolvidos pelos teóricos em educação considerados da corrente crítico-reprodutivista. A pesquisa utilizada é qualitativa e se configura como uma revisão bibliográfica das principais obras dos autores franceses Louis Althusser, Cristian Baudelot e Roger Establet, Pierre Bourdieu e Jean-Claude Passeron; e dos norte-americanos Samuel Bowels e Hebert Gintis. Os apontamentos aqui apresentados visam contribuir tanto com os estudos dos conceitos desenvolvidos por cada um dos autores apresentados quanto dos conceitos que fundamentam a corrente crítico-reprodutivista.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

SUGDEN, ROBERT. "Moral Sentiments and Material Interests. Edited by HERBERT GINTIS, SAMUEL BOWLES, ROBERT BOYD and ERNST FEHR." Economica 74, no. 294 (May 2007): 371–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00582.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Sugden, Robert. "The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Social Sciences. By Herbert Gintis." Economica 78, no. 311 (June 7, 2011): 586–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2011.00882.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Gottesman, Isaac. "Socialist Revolution: Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis, and the Emergence of Marxist Thought in the Field of Education." Educational Studies 49, no. 1 (January 2013): 5–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2012.730588.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Esser, Hartmut. "Anreize, Kognition, Kultur und die symbolische Choreographie der Gesellschaft." Zeitschrift für Soziologie 49, no. 2-3 (June 25, 2020): 91–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0011.

Full text

Abstract:

ZusammenfassungDer Beitrag befasst sich mit verschiedenen Versuchen der Soziologisierung der ökonomischen Theorie bzw. der Rational-Choice-Theorie angesichts der zahlreichen Hinweise auf eine deutlich „begrenzte Rationalität“ und der damit verbundenen Anomalien, besonders aus Experimenten der sogenannten Verhaltensökonomie. Der konkrete Bezug ist der Vorstoß, den Herbert Gintis 2017 in seinem Buch „Individuality and Entanglement“ macht, wo er das Konzept eines „korrelierten Gleichgewichts“ über eine, wie er es nennt, symbolische „Choreographie“ durch sozial geteilte kulturelle Schemata und Skripte als Kern einer weiteren Erweiterung der Rational-Choice-Theorie platziert und der Soziologie anempfiehlt, dem unter Beibehaltung der anderen inhaltlichen Annahmen und methodischen Instrumentarien von Ökonomie und Rational-Choice-Theorie zu folgen. Der Artikel systematisiert und bewertet den Vorschlag vor dem Hintergrund früherer und neuerer Beiträge der Kognitionswissenschaften, der (Kultur-)Soziologie und von Teilen der Rational-Choice-Theorie, die diese Fragen selbst seit einiger Zeit aufgeworfen und in Richtung einer übergreifenden Handlungstheorie und Mikrofundierung der Sozialwissenschaften als Ganzes auszuarbeiten begonnen haben.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Werum, Regina. "Sectionalism and Racial Politics: Federal Vocational Policies and Programs in the Predesegregation South." Social Science History 21, no. 3 (1997): 399–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s014555320001779x.

Full text

Abstract:

Extant literature onvocational reformsgives the impression that they, like other educational reforms, resulted from a consensus between northern industrialists and professional educators (e.g., Bowles and Gintis 1976; Cohen 1968; Cremin 1961; Cuban 1982; Fones-Wolf 1983; Kett 1982; Powers 1992; Tyack 1981 [1974]). If national educational reforms reflected national economic interests, we should expect twentieth-century federal vocational legislation to reflect the interests of an increasingly industrialized national economy. By the same token, regionally specific economic interests should find their reflection primarily in local educational practice. This view rests on the assumption that a “national economy” has existed and that federal policies have not reflected sectional economic interests. In reality, southern sectional interests have shaped a variety of economic and social policies, ranging from post-Reconstruction child labor and compulsory education laws to New Deal policies such as the 1933 National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), the 1935 National Labor Relations (Wagner) Act, welfare policy, and the 1935 Social Security Act establishing old-age security and unemployment compensation (Alston and Ferrie 1985; Bensei 1984; Lieberman 1995; Quadagno 1988, 1994; Shulman 1991; Skocpol 1995).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Grant, Alan P. "Book Review: Game theory in action: An introduction to classical and evolutionary models, by Schecter, S., & Gintis, H." American Economist 62, no. 1 (December 22, 2016): 131–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0569434516683032.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Mitani, John C. "Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011, 262 pp." Comparative Studies in Society and History 54, no. 4 (September 20, 2012): 947–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0010417512000503.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Dubreuil, Benoît. "A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution, S. Bowles and H. Gintis. Princeton University Press, 2011, xii + 262 pages." Economics and Philosophy 28, no. 3 (November 2012): 423–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266267112000302.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Almeida Uranga, Ricardo. "La desigualdad social en Chihuahua: implicaciones en la educación básica en un horizonte de doce años." IE Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH 4, no. 7 (October 7, 2013): 43–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v4i7.577.

Full text

Abstract:

Loera (1996) realizó un primer diagnóstico del sistema de educación estatal con datos de primaria y secundaria del ciclo escolar 1994-95 sobre el grado de asociación (r de Pearson y coeficiente de determinación) entre la eficiencia terminal, la reprobación y deserción en educación básica (primaria y secundaria), y la absorción (de secundaria) versus el índice de marginalidad en los 67 municipios del estado de Chihuahua. Se realizó un segundo análisis de correlación con datos correspondientes al ciclo escolar 2006-2007. En ambos ciclos escolares hay una alta asociación entre marginalidad municipal y los indicadores educativos que se emplearon, lo que corrobora la tesis reproduccionista en educación (Bourdieu y Passeron, 1973, 1977; Bowles y Gintis, 1985). Las asociaciones se dan en este sentido: a mayor marginalidad municipal, menor eficiencia terminal, mayor tasa de reprobación y mayor deserción en primaria. Los indicadores de secundaria muestran asociaciones inexistentes y no resultan ser significativas. Con base en los resultados se recomiendan orientaciones en la política y en el diseño de programas y proyectos públicos de educación para contrarrestar el determinismo contextual en los resultados educativos.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Rockenbach, Bettina. "Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., and Fehr, E.: Moral Sentiments and Material Interests – The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life." Journal of Economics 90, no. 2 (February 28, 2007): 215–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0236-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Mollona, Edoardo. "H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, E. Fehr (eds): Moral Sentiments and Material Interests. The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life." Journal of Management & Governance 11, no. 4 (August 23, 2007): 433–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9032-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Vanderschraaf, Peter. "The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences, Herbert Gintis. Princeton University Press, 2009. xviii + 281 pages." Economics and Philosophy 27, no. 1 (January 18, 2011): 88–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266267110000532.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Gintis'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles