Academic literature on the topic 'Genome supercoiling'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Genome supercoiling.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Genome supercoiling"
El Houdaigui, Bilal, Raphaël Forquet, Thomas Hindré, Dominique Schneider, William Nasser, Sylvie Reverchon, and Sam Meyer. "Bacterial genome architecture shapes global transcriptional regulation by DNA supercoiling." Nucleic Acids Research 47, no. 11 (April 24, 2019): 5648–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz300.
Full textValenti, Anna, Giuseppe Perugino, Mosè Rossi, and Maria Ciaramella. "Positive supercoiling in thermophiles and mesophiles: of the good and evil." Biochemical Society Transactions 39, no. 1 (January 19, 2011): 58–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bst0390058.
Full textGeng, Yuncong, Christopher Herrick Bohrer, Nicolás Yehya, Hunter Hendrix, Lior Shachaf, Jian Liu, Jie Xiao, and Elijah Roberts. "A spatially resolved stochastic model reveals the role of supercoiling in transcription regulation." PLOS Computational Biology 18, no. 9 (September 19, 2022): e1009788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009788.
Full textAhmed, Syed Moiz, and Peter Dröge. "Chromatin Architectural Factors as Safeguards against Excessive Supercoiling during DNA Replication." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 12 (June 24, 2020): 4504. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124504.
Full textSalvador, Maria L., Uwe Klein, and Lawrence Bogorad. "Endogenous Fluctuations of DNA Topology in the Chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii." Molecular and Cellular Biology 18, no. 12 (December 1, 1998): 7235–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.12.7235.
Full textNeguembor, Maria Victoria, Laura Martin, Álvaro Castells-García, Pablo Aurelio Gómez-García, Chiara Vicario, Davide Carnevali, Jumana AlHaj Abed, et al. "Transcription-mediated supercoiling regulates genome folding and loop formation." Molecular Cell 81, no. 15 (August 2021): 3065–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.009.
Full textGilbert, Nick. "Organisation and Function of DNA Supercoiling in the Human Genome." Biophysical Journal 114, no. 3 (February 2018): 13a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.113.
Full textAlcorlo, Martín, Margarita Salas, and José M. Hermoso. "In Vivo DNA Binding of Bacteriophage GA-1 Protein p6." Journal of Bacteriology 189, no. 22 (September 14, 2007): 8024–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.01047-07.
Full textAdkins, Melissa W., and Jessica K. Tyler. "The Histone Chaperone Asf1p Mediates Global Chromatin Disassemblyin Vivo." Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, no. 50 (September 26, 2004): 52069–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m406113200.
Full textBlot, Nicolas, Ramesh Mavathur, Marcel Geertz, Andrew Travers, and Georgi Muskhelishvili. "Homeostatic regulation of supercoiling sensitivity coordinates transcription of the bacterial genome." EMBO reports 7, no. 7 (June 16, 2006): 710–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400729.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Genome supercoiling"
Corless, Samuel. "Role of DNA supercoiling in genome structure and regulation." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/9623.
Full textJohnson, James. "Large scale simulations of genome organisation in living cells." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/31206.
Full textBrambilla, Elisa. "Investigation of E. coli genome complexity by means of fluorescent reporters of gene expression." Thesis, Paris 6, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA066607/document.
Full textEscherichia coli is able to survive in many different environments. The information necessary for this adaptation is encoded in the chromosome. This circular molecule is condensed in a compact DNA-protein structure, called the nucleoid. The chromosome is not uniform, and shows uneven distributions of nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) binding sites, AT-rich sequences and general protein occupancy domains. It has been demonstrated that the position of important genes is highly conserved in ?-Proteobacteria. These differences along the chromosome and the conserved position of important genes suggest that the position of the gene can influence gene expression. To test this hypothesis, I studied the expression of a fluorescent reporter gene inserted in different positions around the chromosome. The expression of the reporter is driven by differently regulated promoters, one repressed by the important NAP H-NS, one non regulated and one subject to supercoiling and stringent control. We studied the dynamical expression of these promoters in different growth conditions, growth phases, upon nutritional upshift and under stress. We showed that the expression of the H-NS dependent promoter depends on the location on the chromosome, because H-NS repression is enhanced in presence of AT-rich sequences. We also studied the influence of a divergent gene on the reporter expression as a function of chromosomal position, and showed that this influence depends on the location of the gene. With our study we have been therefore able to show the impact of chromosomal position on gene expression and to give a new perspective on genome complexity
Guha, Sarmistha. "Altering DNA topology in mycobacteria: impact of perturbation of DNA gyrase on physiology and gene expression." Thesis, 2018. https://etd.iisc.ac.in/handle/2005/5304.
Full textUsongo, Valentine. "Genetic studies on the role of type IA DNA topoisomerases in DNA metabolism and genome maintenance in Escherichia coli." Thèse, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/10878.
Full textDNA supercoiling is important for all cellular processes that require strand separation and is regulated by the opposing enzymatic effects of DNA topoisomerases. Gyrase uses ATP to introduce negative supercoils while topoisomerase I (topA) and topoisomerase IV relax negative supercoils. Cells lacking topoisomerase I are only viable if they have compensatory mutations in gyrase genes that reduce the negative supercoiling level of the chromosome to allow bacterial growth. One such mutation leads to the production of a thermosensitive gyrase (gyrB(Ts)). Gyrase driven supercoiling during transcription in the absence of topoisomerase I causes the accumulation of hypernegatively supercoiled plasmid DNAs due to the formation of R-loops. Overproducing RNase HI (rnhA), an enzyme that degrades the RNA moiety of R-loops, prevents the accumulation of hypernegative supercoils. In the absence of RNase HI alone, R-loops are equally formed and can be used to prime DNA replication independently of oriC/DnaA, a phenomenon known as constitutive stable DNA replication (cSDR). To better understand the link between R-loop formation and hypernegative supercoiling, we constructed a conditional topA rnhA gyrB(Ts) mutant with RNase HI being conditionally expressed from a plasmid borne gene. We found that the DNA of topA rnhA gyrB(Ts) cells was extensively relaxed instead of being hypernegatively supercoiled following the depletion of RNase HI. Relaxation was found to be unrelated to the activity of topoisomerase IV. Cells of topA rnhA gyrB(Ts) formed long filaments full of DNA, consistent with segregation defect. Overproducing topoisomerase III (topB), an enzyme that can perform decatenation, corrected the segregation problems without restoring supercoiling. We found that extracts of topA rnhA gyrB(Ts) cells inhibited gyrase supercoiling activity of wild type cells extracts in vitro, suggesting that the depletion of RNase HI triggered a cell response that inhibited the supercoiling activity of gyrase. Gyrase supercoiling assays in vivo as well as in crude cell extracts revealed that the ATP dependent supercoiling reaction of gyrase was inhibited while the ATP independent relaxation reaction was unaffected. Genetic suppressors of a triple topA rnhA gyrB(Ts) strain that restored supercoiling and corrected the chromosome segregation defects mostly mapped to genes that affected DNA replication, R-loop metabolism and fimbriae formation. The second part of this project aimed at understanding the roles of type IA DNA topoisomerases (topoisomerase I and topoisomerase III) in chromosome segregation and genome maintenance in E. coli. To investigate the role of type IA DNA topoisomerases in chromosome segregation we employed genetic approaches combined with flow cytometry, Western blot analysis and microscopy (for the examination of cell morphology). We found that the Par- phenotypes (formation of large unsegregated nucleoid in midcell) and chromosome segregation defects of a gyrB(Ts) mutant at the nonpermissive temperature were corrected by deleting topA only in the presence of topB. Moreover, overproducing topoisomerase III was shown to correct the Par- phenotype without correcting the growth defect, but overproducing topoisomerase IV, the major cellular decatenase, failed to correct the defects. Our results suggest that type IA topoisomerases play a role in chromosome segregation when gyrase is inefficient. To investigate the role of type IA DNA topoisomerases in genome maintenance, in the third part of the project, we employed genetic approaches combined with suppressor screens, spot assays and microscopy. We found that cells lacking topoisomerase I suffered from supercoiling-dependent growth defects and chromosome segregation defects that could be corrected by deleting recQ, recA or overproducing topoisomerase III and by an oriC15::aph suppressor mutation isolated in the first part of the project. Cells lacking both type 1A topoisomerases formed very long filaments packed with diffuse and unsegregated DNA. Such phenotypes could be partially corrected by overproducing RNase HI or deleting recA, or by suppressor mutations isolated in the first part of the project, that affected cSDR (dnaT18::aph and rne59::aph). Thus, in E. coli, type IA DNA topoisomerases play a role in genome maintenance by inhibiting inappropriate replication from oriC and R-loops and by preventing RecA-dependent chromosome segregation defect through their action with RecQ. The work reported here reveals that inappropriate and unregulated replication is a major source of genome instability. Preventing such replication will ensures proper chromosome segregation leading to a stable genome. RNase HI and type IA DNA topoisomerases play a leading role in preventing unregulated replication. RNase HI achieves this role by modulating ATP dependent gyrase activity and by preventing replication from R-loops (cSDR). Type IA DNA topoisomerases ensure the maintenance of a stable genome by preventing inappropriate replication from oriC and R-loops and by acting with RecQ to prevent RecA dependent-chromosome segregation defects.
Book chapters on the topic "Genome supercoiling"
Jean, Andrew St. "Local Genetic Context, Supercoiling, and Gene Expression." In Organization of the Prokaryotic Genome, 203–15. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/9781555818180.ch12.
Full textHiggins, N. Patrick. "DNA Supercoiling and Its Consequences for Chromosome Structure and Function." In Organization of the Prokaryotic Genome, 189–202. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/9781555818180.ch11.
Full textBenedetti, Fabrizio, Dusan Racko, Julien Dorier, and Andrzej Stasiak. "Introducing Supercoiling into Models of Chromosome Structure." In Modeling the 3D Conformation of Genomes, 115–38. Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis, 2018. | Series: Series in computational biophysics ; 4: CRC Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315144009-6.
Full textWang, James C., and A. Simon Lynch. "Effects of DNA Supercoiling on Gene Expression." In Regulation of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli, 127–47. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8601-8_7.
Full textGellert, Martin, and Rolf Menzel. "DNA Supercoiling as a Regulator of Bacterial Gene Expression." In New Frontiers in the Study of Gene Functions, 51–59. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1845-3_4.
Full textDrlica, Karl, Muhammad Malik, Jian-Ying Wang, Andrzej Sasiak, and Richard R. Sinden. "Chapter 15 Analysis of DNA supercoiling." In Methods in Gene Technology Volume 2, 253–80. Elsevier, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1873-9768(06)80039-3.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Genome supercoiling"
Grohens, Théotime, Sam Meyer, and Guillaume Beslon. "A Genome-Wide Evolutionary Simulation of the Transcription-Supercoiling Coupling." In The 2021 Conference on Artificial Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/isal_a_00434.
Full textLillian, Todd D., and N. C. Perkins. "Electrostatics and Self Contact in an Elastic Rod Approximation for DNA." In ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2009-86632.
Full text