Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Genetically modified food'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Genetically modified food.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Marushkina, О. "Genetically modified food." Thesis, Видавництво СумДУ, 2009. http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/13601.
Full textKhromov, I. "Genetic modified food." Thesis, Сумський державний університет, 2013. http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/33677.
Full textHall, Clare R. "Genetically modified food and crops : perceptions of risks." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4719.
Full textDoubleday, R. V. L. "Political innovation : corporations, controversy and genetically modified food." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2005. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1444629/.
Full textHu, Rongrong 1970. "Labeling of genetically modified organisms and the producer's negative labeling decision under a voluntary labeling regime." Thesis, McGill University, 2008. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=112638.
Full textGruere, Guillaume Pierre Adrien. "Labeling policies and international trade of genetically modified food /." For electronic version search Digital dissertations database. Restricted to UC campuses. Access is free to UC campus dissertations, 2005. http://uclibs.org/PID/11984.
Full textKaye-Blake, William Henry. "Demand for genetically modified food : theory and empirical findings." Phd thesis, Lincoln University. Commerce Division, 2006. http://theses.lincoln.ac.nz/public/adt-NZLIU20060913.102217.
Full textKaye-Blake, William. "Demand for genetically modified food : theory and empirical findings." Lincoln University, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10182/19.
Full textCuellar, Jose. "Mexican consumer preferences for biotechnology and retail food outlets." Online access for everyone, 2004. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Thesis/Fall2004/J%5FCuellar%5F121704.pdf.
Full textGao, Rong, and 高溶. "A systematic review of the use of genetically modified food in China." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/193785.
Full textpublished_or_final_version
Public Health
Master
Master of Public Health
Costa, Font Monserrat. "Consumer Acceptance, Choice and Attitudes towards Genetically Modified (GM) Food." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/7059.
Full textHi ha diferents agents del mercat que participen en aquest debat, com és el cas dels productors, els quals en poden obtenir benefici pel que fa a millores en eficiència i reducció de costos. Tanmateix, és essencial tenir en compte l'opinió dels consumidors alhora d'analitzar els límits comercials de les noves tecnologies.
Per a conèixer l'opinió dels consumidors cal entendre el seu procés d'elecció i de valoració dels productes agroalimentaris, com també el seu comportament a l'hora de prendre decisions en el mercat alimentari.
Aquesta tesis comença amb una extensa revisió bibliogràfica en relació a les actituds dels consumidors vers els productes modificats genèticament.
Seguidament s'analitza la intenció de compra dels consumidors utilitzant experiments d'elecció. L'objectiu principal d'aquesta tesi s'ha assolit amb els subsegüents capítols on s'han analitzat els diferents elements cognitius que porten a l'individu a la intenció final de compra. La metodologia emprada ha estat principalment equacions estructurals i experiments d'elecció.
S'han emprat diferents bases de dades per a poder contrastar totes les hipòtesis plantejades en l'estudi.
La principal contribució d'aquesta tesi ha estat determinar quins son els elements que cal considerar per entendre el procés de decisió del consumidors vers els aliments modificats genèticament, com també determinar que existeix un clar escepticisme en la societat pel que fa a aquests productes. Les conclusions d'aquesta tesi posen en manifest la necessitat de una millor estratègia de comunicació que permeti als consumidors una percepció de millor i major qualitat d'informació en relació a aquests productes.
The introduction of new technologies in food production not only has revolutioned its productive efficiency but has exerted important demand side effects that cannot be dismissed and require careful analysis. This is especially the case of genetically modified (GM) food, typical daily consumed products (e.g. GM milk, tomato, maize, etc) given its considerable interest and worldwide public controversy. Several stakeholders are place, on the one hand, farmers and manufactures perceive potential benefits from efficiency improvements as well as costs, mainly resulting from the need to reimburse intellectual property rights for new foods. From a demand side, GM food brings new products in the food chain and ultimately fulfils to an extent a latent consumer's preference for diversity. Hence, in order to determine the limits of technology dissemination and transfer it becomes a key issue to examine and disentangle which demand side factors stand behind technology acceptance. This calls for a better understanding of consumer choice, its valuation and the behavioural decision making process.
The valuation of a new technology good implies the provision of information from several sources - public and private, formal and informal, etc - while conditioning on the credibility and trustworthiness of each relevant information source. Given the information available, a further issue concerns attitude expression and formation, which ultimately leads to the final question regarding product valuation and consumer preference. Interestingly, attitude formation for the case of new food generations is found to be explained by a combination of risk and benefit perceptions, based on different elements such as a general attitude towards science, knowledge, trust, education and values, among others.
This thesis begins with an extensive review of the literature on attitudes towards GM agro-food products- chapter 2- by means of a literature review. Next it conducts a study on consumers' final intentions towards agro - food products, entailing the application of choice experiments - chapter 3. moreover, the main core of this dissertation is aiming at examining what gives rise to the final choice (chapters 4 to 6). The methodologically employed relies on structural equation modelling, although in each chapter different databases have been used. The relative strengths of each database allow us taking into account the information required to test specific hypotheses. Finally, some conclusions are drawn in chapter 7 which summarises the main findings of each chapter and put them in context of the main discussion questions examined in this thesis.
The main contribution of this thesis has been to point out a set of features that condition choice, intentions and revealed purchase intentions regarding GM food. Our wok is innovative in that: 1) it contains an innovative literature review; 2) develops choice modelling of scenarios that includes, apart from methodological features, the choice between GM processed and organic food; and 3) unlike most of behavioural analysis it exploits using structural equation modelling, several theoretical structures that explain decision making and, particularly, the role of broader attitudes towards science and technology in influencing purchase intentions alongside the effect of both risks attitudes and risk perceptions in determining consumer acceptance.
The sequence and findings of the thesis can be summarized as follows: drawing from an exhaustive review of published finding regarding public intentions towards GM food we conclude that there is consumer's scepticism explaining a negative valuation towards GM food. However, the most important outcome has been to find that final purchasing intention is the result of a complex decision process which only has been partially explained in the literature. Therefore, upon the definition of a general theoretical model this thesis has tried to explain in the different chapters some specific issues of such model as well as to validate it in a croos - country exercise in the last chapter. Results from this study rises a key policy implication: the need of a well defined communication stralegy to provide information in such a way that allows individuals to feel adequately informed.
Karampaxoglou, Thaleia. "Genetically Modified Food and Crops : Risks and Intellectual Property Rights." Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Centrum för tillämpad etik, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-119766.
Full textMcDonald, Anne-Lise Nadia Marina. "An evaluation of attitudes and behaviours towards food-related risks." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.390638.
Full textDean, Moira S. "Contested innovation : influence of conflict on perceptions of genetically modified food." Thesis, University of Surrey, 2000. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/842820/.
Full textPoortinga, Wouter. "Public perceptions and trust in the regulation of genetically modified food." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.410080.
Full textReynolds, Laurence. "The production, governance and contestation of genetically modified food and crops." Thesis, University of Essex, 2010. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.528859.
Full textモニカ, ラコヴィタ, and Monica Racovita. "Policies of genetically modified crops in India: food security and biosafety politics." Thesis, https://doors.doshisha.ac.jp/opac/opac_link/bibid/BB12252585/?lang=0, 2011. https://doors.doshisha.ac.jp/opac/opac_link/bibid/BB12252585/?lang=0.
Full textBordoni, R. "Microarray technology for multiplex detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/33624.
Full textScholderer, Joachim. "Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods in Europe : structure and changeability." Phd thesis, Universität Potsdam, 2004. http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2006/624/.
Full textBased on classical approaches in attitude research and modern theories of social cognition, a general model of the structure, function and dynamics of whole systems of attitudes is developed. The predictions of the model are empirically tested based on an attitude survey (N = 2000) and two attitude change experiments (N = 1400 and N = 750). All three studies were conducted in parallel in four EU member states. The results show that consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods are embedded into a structured system of general socio-political attitudes. The system operates as a schema through which consumers form global evaluations of the technology. Specific risk and benefit judgments are mere epiphenomena of this process. Risk-benefit trade-offs, as often presupposed in the literature, do not appear to enter the process. The attitudes have a value-expressive function; their purpose is not just a temporary reduction of complexity. These properties render the system utterly resistant to communicative interventions. At the same time, it exerts stong anchoring effects on the processing of new information. Communication of benefit arguments can trigger boomerang effects and backfire on the credibility of the communicator when the arguments contrast with preexisting attitudes held by the consumer. Only direct sensory experience with high-quality products can partially bypass the system and lead to the formation of alternative attitude structures. Therefore, the recommended market introduction strategy for genetically modified foods is the simultaneous and coordinated launch of many high-quality products. Point of sale promotions should be the central instrument. Information campaigns, on the other hand, are not likely to have an effect on the product and technology acceptance of European consumers.
Gentechnisch veränderte Lebensmittel haben sich im Lauf der letzten zwei Jahrzehnte zu einem Symbol verbraucherpolitischer Auseinandersetzungen in Europa entwickelt. Mit der Aufhebung des Quasi-Moratoriums im Mai 2004 ist der Weg zum Markt zwar prinzipiell freigeschaltet, Strategien der Produkteinführung fehlen jedoch. Ziel der Arbeit ist, potenzielle Hindernisse im Bereich der Verbraucherakzeptanz auszuloten und Wege aufzuzeigen, wie Vorurteile gegenüber diesen Produkten abgebaut werden könnten. Nach einem historischen Abriss der Gentechnikdebatte in Europa wird zunächst die existierende Literatur zur Verbraucherakzeptanz diskutiert. Obwohl die bisherige Forschung in ihren Ergebnissen konvergiert, sind grundsätzlichere Fragen weitgehend ungelöst geblieben.
Auf der Grundlage klassischer Ansätze der Einstellungsforschung und moderner Theorien sozialer Kognition wird daher ein allgemeines Modell der Struktur, Funktion und Dynamik ganzer Einstellungssysteme entworfen. Die Vorhersagen des Modells werden anhand einer Einstellungsbefragung (N = 2000) und zweier Einstellungsänderungsexperimente (N = 1400 und N = 750) empirisch überprüft. Alle drei Studien wurden parallel in vier EU-Mitgliedsstaaten durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Verbrauchereinstellungen zu gentechnisch veränderten Lebensmitteln in ein strukturiertes System allgemeiner soziopolitischer Einstellungen eingebettet sind. Das System fungiert als Schema, anhand dessen eine globale Bewertung der Gentechnik vorgenommen wird. Spezifische Nutzen- und Risikourteile sind lediglich Epiphänomene dieses Prozesses. Nutzen-Risiko-Abwägungen, wie sie in der Literatur oft unterstellt werden, finden dabei offenbar nicht statt. Die Einstellungen haben eine wertexpressive Funktion, dienen also nicht nur der vordergründigen Reduktion von Komplexität. Diese Eigenschaften machen das System ausgesprochen resistent gegenüber Versuchen der kommunikativen Beeinflussung. Gleichzeitig übt es eine starke Ankerwirkung auf die Verarbeitung neuer Informationen aus. Kommunikation von Nutzenargumenten zu gentechnisch veränderten Lebensmitteln kann zu Bumerangeffekten auf die Glaubwürdigkeit eines Kommunikators führen, wenn die Argumente den Voreinstellungen der Verbraucher widersprechen. Lediglich direkte sensorische Erfahrung mit qualitativ hochwertigen Produkten kann zu einer teilweisen Entkoppelung des Systems und damit zum Aufbau alternativer Einstellungsstrukturen führen. Als optimale Markteinführungsstrategie für gentechnisch veränderte Lebensmittel wird daher die gleichzeitige und koordinierte Einführung vieler hochwertiger Einzelprodukte empfohlen. Zentrales Instrument sollten Aktionen am Point of Sale sein. Vorbereitende Informationskampagnen werden dagegen voraussichtlich keine Wirkungen auf die Produkt- and Technikakzeptanz europäischer Verbraucher haben.
Lyness, C. Amanda. "The stability of genetically-modified yeasts in relation to beer of good and consistent quality." Thesis, Heriot-Watt University, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/10399/1356.
Full textLewis, Rebecca Mardi. "Perceptions of and attitudes to genetically modified food in relation to other food processing methods and technologies /." Title page, contents and abstract only, 2000. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09HS/09hsl6731.pdf.
Full textDiaz, Carcamo Ricardo I. "Consumers acceptance of genetically modified food products in Chile and economic implications of invaisve [i.e. invasive] species in international trade." Online access for everyone, 2005. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Thesis/Spring2005/r%5Fdiaz-carcamo%5F050305.pdf.
Full textShirai, Tomoko. "The WTO and the mandatory labeling of generically modified foods /." Thesis, McGill University, 2004. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=81235.
Full textMagnusson, Maria. "Consumer Perception of Organic and Genetically Modified Foods : Health and Environmental Considerations." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala : Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis :, 2004. http://publications.uu.se/theses/abstract.xsql?dbid=4218.
Full textMoore, Elizabeth Louise. "Science, internationalization, and policy networks, regulating genetically-engineered food crops in Canada and the United States, 1973-1998." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2000. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp02/NQ53851.pdf.
Full textNewcomb, Ellyn Margaret. "Effects of GM Disclosure Statements on Consumer Perceptions of Selected Food Products in Survey and Sensory Panel Settings." BYU ScholarsArchive, 2017. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/6699.
Full textDe, Beer Taryn Lynne. "Stakeholder involvement in the development of genetically modified (GM) food labelling policy in South Africa." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19959.
Full textD'Angelo, Jeremy Martin. "Identifying factors of millennial publics risk information seeking and processing strategies of genetically modified food." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/36256.
Full textDepartment of Communications and Agricultural Education
Jason D. Ellis
Genetically modified crops have been beneficial to farmers in terms of saved time, money, and energy while increasing yields and often times reducing pesticide dependency. These benefits outweigh the increased costs, allowing genetically modified crops to become one of the fastest adopted farm technologies in history. Despite overwhelming approval of genetically modified crops among farmers, consumers have been hesitant to consume genetically modified food. Consumers see genetically modified food as a risk without immediate reward. Millennial consumers are a powerful population segment that rivals or overtakes other population segments in terms of size, influence, and purchasing abilities. Yet, they are often lumped into one homogenous group by marketers when they are a diverse group comprised of unique segments. The purpose of this study was to better understand how millennial consumers find and process risk information about genetically modified food so that agricultural communicators can better strategize communication efforts. Applying the Situational Theory of Publics and the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model, this study went one step further by differentiating between Supportive and Non-supportive publics. The research objectives of this study are as follows: 1) Identify the individual characteristics of both Supportive and Non-supportive millennial publics of genetically modified food; 2) Examine relevant channel beliefs of Supportive and Non-supportive millennial publics of genetically modified food; 3) Identify and describe the information gap of Supportive and Non-supportive millennial publics of genetically modified food; 4) Define the perceived information gathering capacity of Supportive and Non-supportive millennial publics of genetically modified food; and 5) Characterize the information seeking and processing behavior of Supportive and Non-supportive millennial publics of genetically modified food. An Internet survey was distributed to individuals between the ages of 18 and 36 within the United States. The majority of Non-supportive publics had a high level of issue involvement and the majority of Supportive publics had a low level of issue involvement. Meaning, the majority of Non-supportive publics are more active about the issue than Supportive publics. Age was found to be correlated with systematic processing and information avoidance with older millennials more likely to systematically process information and less likely to avoid information. Additionally, this study found that regardless of knowledge level, wealthier individuals who do not support genetically modified food are more likely to be actively involved in the issue and wealthier individuals who support the technology are more likely to be passive about the issue. The majority of millennial publics in all eight groups reported a knowledge deficit to some degree. The research also found that heuristic processing was negatively correlated to systematic processing and higher levels of information avoidance were negatively correlated with lower levels of active information seeking. Non-supportive Active publics (high issue involvement/high knowledge) were found to have the highest mean active information seeking and systematic processing scores and lowest mean heuristic processing and information avoidance scores; supporting past findings that knowledge does not always equate to support and that communication practitioners may have trouble changing the opinion of a large portion of Non-supportive publics.
Nader, Richard Harrison. "Cultural impacts on public perceptions of agricultural biotechnology: comparison between South Korea and the United States." Texas A&M University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4976.
Full textKaneko, Naoya. "Three essays on economic valuation of consumer preferences on genetically modified foods." Connect to resource, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1127328876.
Full textTitle from first page of PDF file. Document formatted into pages; contains xiv, 168 p.; also includes graphics (some col.). Includes bibliographical references (p. 161-168). Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center
Epp, Astrid. "Law in conflict: the regulation of genetically modified food in Germany and in the United States." [S.l. : s.n.], 2003. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=973556633.
Full textTamošiūnaitė, Šarūnė. "KTU cheminės technologijos fakulteto studentų žinių ir požiūrio apie genetiškai modifikuotą maistą ir jo ženklinimą tyrimas." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2008. http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20080619_145307-29192.
Full textAim of study: to evaluate student‘s knowledge and attitude to genetically modified food and its labeling in KTU faculty of chemical technology. Objectives: 1. To survey the repositories of genetically modified food and his labeling. 2. To survey the knowledge and attitude to genetically modified food and its labeling. 3. To prepare recomendations to increase privity of genetically modified food and its labeling. Methods: Object of the research - knowledge and attitude to genetically modified food and its labeling. The questionnaire was compiled after making an analysis of the latest Lithuanian and foreign scientific literature and legislation. There were totally 120 students of KTU faculty of chemical tecnology interviewed using the anonymous questionnaire (response rate 80,83 percentage). Data analysis was performed using the statistical data analysis package SPSS (version 13.00) (the chi-squared test, df) and Microsoft office Excel 2007. Differences between the indices were considered statistically significant for p-values less than 0.05. Results: The most of respondents get information about genetically modified food and its labeling commonly in internet (15.5 percentage women and 11.3 percentage men), 30.9 percentage women and 35.1 men know a little bit, but they want to get more information. In addition to this, respondents think, that genetically modified food is harmful (33.7 percentage women and 32.3 percentage men) because of lack information about its safety (33.6... [to full text]
Adeniyi, Oluwafunmilola Foluke. "Access to safe food in South Africa as a human rights imperative." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/4930.
Full textThe aim of this study is to examine laws and policies relating to food safety in South Africa, specifically with regard to labelling requirements in the food industry. It is hoped that this research will serve as a pointer for policy and legislative reforms in a bid to identify weak areas as well as encourage accountability and strengthen government’s response to the realisation of the right to safe food as a human right imperative.
National Research Foundation (NRF)
Howarth, Anita. "Discursive intersections of newspapers and policy elites : a case study of genetically modified food in Britain, 1996-2000." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2012. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/388/.
Full textQuaife, Peter. "Linkages between ecocentric values and action in expert discourse: the case of genetically modified food in the UK." Thesis, Aston University, 1999. http://publications.aston.ac.uk/10728/.
Full textMcManigal, Barney. "Controlling controversial science : biotechnology policy in Britain and the United States (1984-2004)." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2013. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:eda8d57b-66dc-4cd6-8ad4-d863ae43e8ed.
Full textBerhaupt, Amanda. "The Perceptions, Attitudes and Practices of Registered Dietitians Regarding Functional Foods." FIU Digital Commons, 2010. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/156.
Full textBurchardi, Jan-Erik. "Die Vereinbarkeit der europäischen Vorschriften zur Kennzeichnung gentechnisch veränderter Lebensmittel mit dem Welthandelsrecht /." Berlin : Duncker und Humblot, 2007. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=015744372&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
Full textParkinson, Anne. "The Lost Stakeholder: A Case Study of Risk and Trust Perceptions Held by Canola Farmers in NSW and the Implications for Policy Making in the Area of Biotechnology, Environment and Agriculture." Thesis, Griffith University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365501.
Full textThesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
School of Environmental Sciences
Faculty of Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology
Full Text
Lu, Linqi. "Framing Genetically-modified Foods Communication in China: A Content Analysis of News Coverage of People’s Daily and Southern Metropolis." Scholar Commons, 2017. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7054.
Full textKlimaitė, Vaida. "Darbuotojų, dirbančių X prekybos centre, požiūris į genetiškai modifikuotų maisto produktų ir maisto priedų vartojimą." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2013. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2013~D_20130605_132039-39623.
Full textThe aim of the work. To assess the employees’ attitude to the consumption of the genetically modified products and food additives. The goals of the work. 1. To determine the approach of the employees to the genetically modified products. 2. To determine the approach of the employees to food additives. 3. To assess the main factors which determine the choice of the food products. The methodology of the research. 190 questionnaires were distributed during the research. 160 questionnaires were completed. The data of the survey were analyzed by using the software package SPSS 15.0 “for Windows”. Hypotheses were checked by applying for the df and χ2 tests, and the appointed significance level is p<0,05. The results. 56,9 % of the respondents negatively assesses genetically modified products. 56,2 % of the questioned women and 70,0 % of the questioned men think that GM food is harmful. GM food is used by the 20,0 % of the questioned women and the 30,0 % of the questioned men. The food additives are assessed negatively by the 35,0 % of respondents, but 91,9 % of the questioned buy the products with the additives. 50,5 % of women and 60,0 % of men would like to get the information about the food additives at their workplace. 56,1 % of the respondents think that food additives are harmful and could have a negative influence on the person’s health. Conclusions: 1. Genetically modified productsare used by the respondents of different age, education and having the... [to full text]
Pazuniak, Orest V. "Do Labels Make A Difference: Estimating The Impacts Of Vermont’s Gmo Labeling Law On Perceptions And Prices." ScholarWorks @ UVM, 2018. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/974.
Full textLehmkuhl, David. "The Effects of the Dispute between the EU and the US over Genetically Modified Organisms in Food and Feed on Financial Markets." [S.l. : s.n.], 2007. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-32043.
Full text"Detection of genetically modified foods (GMFs)." 2001. http://library.cuhk.edu.hk/record=b5896000.
Full textThesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 175-192).
Abstracts in English and Chinese.
Declaration --- p.ii
Acknowledgements --- p.iii
Abstract --- p.iv
Abbreviation --- p.vi
Table of Contents --- p.vii
Chapter Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1
Chapter Section I --- The Making of Genetically Modified Organisms --- p.2
Chapter 1.1 --- Conventional breeding in agriculture --- p.2
Chapter 1.2 --- What is genetic engineering? --- p.4
Chapter 1.3 --- Plant transformation --- p.5
Chapter 1.3.1 --- Agrobacterium-mediated --- p.6
Chapter 1.3.2 --- Direct gene transfer --- p.8
Chapter 1.3.2.1 --- Microparticle bombardment --- p.8
Chapter 1.3.2.2 --- Protoplasts --- p.9
Chapter 1.3.3 --- Gene silencing --- p.10
Chapter 1.4 --- Examples of genetically modified crops --- p.13
Chapter 1.5 --- Foreign genes commonly found in transgenic plants --- p.14
Chapter Section II --- Benefits and Environmental Concern of GMOs --- p.17
Chapter 2.1 --- Mechanism of GMO --- p.17
Chapter 2.1.1 --- Herbicide tolerant crops --- p.18
Chapter 2.1.2 --- Insect resistant crops --- p.19
Chapter 2.1.3 --- Delayed ripening crops --- p.20
Chapter 2.1.4 --- Virus resistant crops --- p.20
Chapter 2.2 --- Benefits of GMOs --- p.21
Chapter 2.3 --- Impact of GM foods to human health and the environment --- p.22
Chapter 2.3.1 --- Human health --- p.22
Chapter 2.3.1.1 --- GM potatoes --- p.23
Chapter 2.3.1.2 --- CaMV risks? --- p.24
Chapter 2.3.1.3 --- Food allergy --- p.25
Chapter 2.3.2 --- Environmental concerns --- p.26
Chapter 2.3.2.1 --- Horizontal gene transfer --- p.27
Chapter 2.3.2.1.1 --- Selectable marker genes --- p.27
Chapter 2.3.2.1.2 --- Herbicide resistant genes --- p.29
Chapter 2.3.2.1.3 --- Insect resistant genes --- p.29
Chapter 2.3.2.2 --- Ecology --- p.30
Chapter 2.3.2.2.1 --- Monarch butterfly --- p.30
Chapter Section III --- Future developments of GMO --- p.32
Chapter 3.1 --- Designer Food and engineered plants --- p.32
Chapter 3.1.1 --- Insect resistance --- p.33
Chapter 3.1.2 --- Viral resistance --- p.33
Chapter 3.1.3 --- Fungal resistance --- p.34
Chapter 3.1.4 --- Nutritional quality --- p.34
Chapter 3.1.5 --- Modifications of oil composition --- p.35
Chapter 3.1.6 --- Medical applications --- p.37
Chapter 3.1.7 --- Environmental applications --- p.40
Chapter 3.1.7.1 --- Tolerance to high salinity and drought --- p.40
Chapter 3.1.7.2 --- Tolerance to frost --- p.41
Chapter 3.1.7.3 --- Bioremediation --- p.42
Chapter 3.1.7.4 --- Biodegradable products --- p.43
Chapter Section IV --- Regulation of GMO --- p.44
Chapter 4.1 --- The question of labeling --- p.44
Chapter 4.1.1 --- Moral and ethical issues --- p.44
Chapter 4.1.2 --- Animal welfare --- p.45
Chapter 4.2 --- International practice in GMO labeling --- p.46
Chapter 4.2.1 --- United States of America --- p.46
Chapter 4.2.2 --- Canada --- p.48
Chapter 4.2.3 --- European Union --- p.49
Chapter 4.2.4 --- Australia and New Zealand --- p.50
Chapter 4.2.5 --- Japan --- p.51
Chapter 4.2.6 --- Republic of Korea --- p.52
Chapter 4.2.7 --- China --- p.53
Chapter 4.2.8 --- Taiwan --- p.53
Chapter 4.2.9 --- Hong Kong --- p.54
Chapter Section V --- Uses of crops --- p.56
Chapter 5.1 --- Uses of crops --- p.56
Chapter 5.1.1 --- Soybean --- p.56
Chapter 5.1.2 --- Corn --- p.57
Chapter 5.1.3 --- Tomato --- p.58
Chapter 5.1.4 --- Potato --- p.59
Chapter 5.1.5 --- Rice --- p.60
Chapter 5.1.6 --- Rapeseed --- p.61
Chapter 5.1.7 --- Oil --- p.62
Chapter 5.2 --- "Food additives, hormones and flavourings" --- p.63
Chapter Chapter 2 --- Materials & Methods --- p.65
Chapter 2.1 --- Materials --- p.66
Chapter 2.1.1 --- Growth media & agar --- p.66
Chapter 2.1.2 --- Reagents for agarose gel electrophoresis --- p.67
Chapter 2.1.3 --- Reagents for preparation of competent cells --- p.67
Chapter 2.1.4 --- Reagents for measurement of DNA concentration --- p.68
Chapter 2.1.4.1 --- Measurement of DNA concentration by PicoGreen --- p.68
Chapter 2.1.5 --- Reagents for Southern hybridization --- p.68
Chapter 2.2 --- Methods --- p.70
Chapter 2.2.1 --- Restriction endonuclease digestion --- p.70
Chapter 2.2.2 --- Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA --- p.70
Chapter 2.2.3 --- DNA recovery from agarose gel --- p.71
Chapter 2.2.3.1 --- QIAquick® gel extraction --- p.71
Chapter 2.2.4 --- Ligation of purified DNA fragment into vector --- p.72
Chapter 2.2.5 --- Transformation --- p.72
Chapter 2.2.6 --- Rubidium chloride method for making competent cells --- p.12
Chapter 2.2.7 --- Plasmid DNA preparation --- p.73
Chapter 2.2.7.1 --- Concert Rapid Mini Prep --- p.73
Chapter 2.2.7.2 --- QIAprep® Miniprep --- p.74
Chapter 2.2.8 --- Extraction of plant genomic DNA --- p.75
Chapter 2.2.8.1 --- Qiagen DNeasy´ёØ Plant Mini Kit --- p.75
Chapter 2.2.9 --- Southern Hybridization --- p.75
Chapter 2.2.9.1 --- Denaturation --- p.76
Chapter 2.2.9.2 --- Blot transfer --- p.76
Chapter 2.2.9.3 --- Pre-hybridization --- p.77
Chapter 2.2.9.4 --- Synthesis of radiolabelled probe --- p.77
Chapter 2.2.9.5 --- Hybridization of radiolabelled probe on filter --- p.77
Chapter 2.2.9.6. --- Detection of hybridized probes --- p.78
Chapter 2.2.10 --- Measurement of DNA concentration --- p.78
Chapter 2.2.10.1 --- Determination of DNA on EtBr stained gel --- p.78
Chapter 2.2.10.2 --- Determination of DNA by UV spectrophotometer --- p.78
Chapter 2.2.10.3 --- Determination of DNA by PicoGreen --- p.79
Chapter 2.2.11 --- DNA sequencing --- p.80
Chapter 2.2.11.1 --- Automated sequencing by ABI Prism 377 --- p.80
Chapter Chapter 3 --- PCR Diagnostics --- p.81
Chapter 3.1 --- Applications of PCR to processed foods --- p.82
Chapter 3.1.1 --- DNA quality --- p.82
Chapter 3.1.2 --- PCR & Multiplex PCR --- p.83
Chapter 3.1.3 --- Choice of primers --- p.84
Chapter 3.1.4 --- Inhibitors --- p.84
Chapter 3.2 --- Materials & Methods --- p.85
Chapter 3.2.1 --- Selection of primers --- p.85
Chapter 3.2.2 --- Amplification of target sequences --- p.86
Chapter 3.2.3 --- Multiple amplification of target sequences --- p.87
Chapter 3.3 --- Results --- p.88
Chapter 3.4 --- Discussion --- p.93
Chapter Chapter 4 --- Quality Control in GMO detection --- p.95
Chapter 4.1 --- Standardization of pre- and post- PCR analysis --- p.96
Chapter 4.1.1 --- General guidelines --- p.96
Chapter 4.1.2 --- UV irradiation --- p.97
Chapter 4.1.3 --- Inactivation protocols --- p.93
Chapter 4.1.4 --- Positive and negative controls --- p.99
Chapter 4.1.5 --- PCR verification --- p.99
Chapter 4.1.6 --- Equipment decontamination --- p.100
Chapter 4.2 --- Materials & Methods --- p.101
Chapter 4.2.1 --- Selection of primers for external control --- p.101
Chapter 4.2.2 --- Development of the external control --- p.101
Chapter 4.2.3 --- Selection of primers for internal control --- p.103
Chapter 4.3 --- Results --- p.104
Chapter 4.4 --- Discussion --- p.107
Chapter Chapter 5 --- DNA extraction from food samples --- p.110
Chapter 5.1 --- Introduction --- p.111
Chapter 5.2 --- Reagents and Buffers for DNA extraction from food samples --- p.112
Chapter 5.2.1 --- Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction method --- p.112
Chapter 5.2.2 --- Organic-based extraction method --- p.113
Chapter 5.2.3 --- Potassium acetate/sodium dodecyl sulphate precipitation method --- p.113
Chapter 5.2.4 --- Hexane-based extraction method --- p.114
Chapter 5.3 --- Weight and names of samples --- p.115
Chapter 5.4 --- DNA extraction methods --- p.115
Chapter 5.4.1 --- CTAB extraction method --- p.115
Chapter 5.4.2 --- Qiagen DNeasy´ёØ plant mini kit --- p.116
Chapter 5.4.3 --- Promega Wizard® genomic DNA purification --- p.116
Chapter 5.4.4 --- Promega Wizard® Magnetic DNA purification system --- p.117
Chapter 5.4.5 --- Promega Wizard® DNA Clean-Up system --- p.118
Chapter 5.4.6 --- Qiagen QIAshreddrer´ёØ and QIAamp spin column --- p.119
Chapter 5.4.7 --- Chelex-based extraction method --- p.119
Chapter 5.4.8 --- Organic-based extraction method --- p.120
Chapter 5.4.9 --- Nucleon PhytoPure extraction and purification method --- p.120
Chapter 5.4.10 --- Potassium acetate/SDS precipitation method --- p.121
Chapter 5.4.11 --- Hexane-based extraction method --- p.122
Chapter 5.5 --- Results --- p.123
Chapter 5.5.1 --- Comparison of eleven extraction methods --- p.123
Chapter 5.5.2 --- Comparison of DNA extraction on selected methods --- p.125
Chapter 5.6 --- Discussion --- p.132
Chapter Chapter 6 --- Quantitative Analysis --- p.136
Chapter 6.1 --- Introduction --- p.137
Chapter 6.1.1 --- Chemistry of quantitative PCR --- p.138
Chapter 6.1.2 --- PCR system --- p.140
Chapter 6.2 --- Materials & Methods --- p.142
Chapter 6.2.1 --- Design of primers and probes --- p.142
Chapter 6.2.2 --- Methods --- p.145
Chapter 6.3 --- Results --- p.146
Chapter 6.3.1 --- Selection of primer/probe --- p.146
Chapter 6.3.2 --- Primer optimization --- p.149
Chapter 6.3.3 --- Quantitative analysis of real samples --- p.158
Chapter 6.4 --- Discussion --- p.152
Chapter Chapter 7 --- Conclusion --- p.168
References --- p.175
Appendix --- p.193
Chen, Po-Chang, and 陳伯彰. "A Study in Legalization of Genetically Modified Food." Thesis, 2013. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/35000669657830581415.
Full text嶺東科技大學
財經法律研究所
101
The most common concerns about genetically modified organisms (GMOs) among environmentalists, doctors, scientists, and public interest advocates have to do with the health risks they might pose, the environmental pollution they might cause, and the biodiversity they might threaten. For example, genetically engineered crops could pollinate with other plant life making them genetically engineered, as well; GM crops that contain their own pesticides often kill more than their targeted insects, producing a chain reaction of unintended consequences, among them pesticide resistant “super-pests”; GM crops designed to be herbicide resistant (so that large amounts of strong weed killer can be safely used on them) have already spread to related weed species, which then also pick up the resistance to the herbicides and become “super-weeds” that are difficult to control. There is also the possibility of creating new strands of “super-viruses” as the genes of viral resistant plants are passed on to other plants. Finally, there is the danger of GE crops threatening regional biodiversity as single, mono-crops are imported and transplanted into foreign ecosystems. As philosophers and citizens we can call attention to the political character of our laws, policies, and institutions to show that economic practices also involve political choices, embodying political ideas, and are thus open to political deliberation and transformation. You don’t have to be an expert to know that there are some things that shouldn’t be privatized – and that’s what’s wrong with genetically modified food.
"Impact of genetically modified (GM) food labeling system on food manufacturers in Hong Kong." 2002. http://library.cuhk.edu.hk/record=b5895940.
Full textThesis (M.B.A.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 65-66).
Questionnaire also in Chinese.
ABSTRACT --- p.ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS --- p.iv
LIST OF TABLES --- p.vi
LIST OF FIGURES --- p.vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT --- p.ix
Chapter
Chapter I. --- INTRODUCTION --- p.1
Genes and GM Food --- p.1
Examples of GM Food Available in the Market --- p.2
Potential Benefits and Risks of GM Food --- p.2
Scientific Evidence for the Safety of GM Food --- p.5
The International Scene of GM Food Labeling System --- p.6
Pros and Cons of GM Food Labeling --- p.7
Consumers' Perception and Acceptance of GM Food --- p.9
Situation in Hong Kong --- p.11
Hong Kong Public´ةs Concern --- p.13
Chapter II. --- RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY --- p.15
Research Objectives --- p.15
Methodology --- p.15
Research Design --- p.15
Questionnaire --- p.16
Data Collection --- p.17
Data Analysis Method --- p.17
Chapter III. --- FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS --- p.19
General Public's knowledge about / awareness of GM food --- p.19
Consumers' Perception and Attitudes towards GM Food and Traditionally Produced Food --- p.22
Quality --- p.25
Nutritional Value --- p.27
Price --- p.29
Safety of consumption --- p.31
Consumers' Purchasing Behavior --- p.34
To evaluate consumers' opinions and reactions to the GM Food labeling system in Hong Kong --- p.40
Profiles of the respondents --- p.43
Limitations --- p.46
Chapter IV. --- RECOMMENDATIONS --- p.48
For Government --- p.48
For GM Food Manufacturers --- p.50
For Suppliers --- p.51
APPENDIX --- p.53
BIBLIOGRAPHY --- p.65
Prescott, Vanessa Elizabeth. "Genetically modified plants and immunity." Phd thesis, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/149576.
Full textCHENG, CIAO-LIN, and 鄭喬臨. "A Study of Food Security from Genetically Modified Crops." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/4366tb.
Full text國立中正大學
戰略暨國家安全碩士在職專班
105
There is a famous saying by the former secretary of state Henry Alfred Kissinger: “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.” Food becomes one of the most effective weapons that dominate the world pattern. The impact is far more profound than any weapons. At the same time, food security is also related to commercial trade, social model, and other levels, not simply the demand for food and clothing only. Simultaneously, Food security is not just a simple food and clothing needs but also related to commercial trade, social model, and other levels. Undeniable facts such as global population surge, arable land reduction, and extreme climate are bound to have an impact on food production. The effectiveness of the green revolution is now like a spent arrow. The development of genetically modified technology may be a chance to save food from lack of crisis. With the progress of science and technology, since the advent of genetically modified crops, Resistance performance such as insect resistance, disease resistance, drought, resistant herbicides, increase the nutrients, etc., more and more types, the use of the items are also more and more diversified, but the world's doubts about the genetic transformation is more and deeper. It involves environmental pollution, biodiversity, seed patent, food sovereignty, land expropriation and the international diplomatic dimension. Interest network between government departments, transnational corporations, and academic institutions are leaving the genetically modified crop into a complex situation. People also have distrust on food security. There is a difference between countries for the genetically modified crops adopted by the policy and the actual development of the situation, because of national conditions, the geographical environment is different. States should be common to take preventive measures, carefully and correctly look at genetic technology, Using the integration of international organizations to set a reasonable set of standards from research, cultivation, food, processing, trade and other different levels, then by the national conditions and cultural characteristics, to determine the relevant norms, and then from the laboratory of scientific research into the daily life. The scientific research of the laboratory can be integrated into daily life, with a view to discovering the effects of genetically modified crops to the world's most basic human social organization "Rural" and the most basic needs of mankind "diet", in order to eliminate the public's suspicion of genetic technology and distrust, and become one of the tools to promote food security.
Chang, Shu-Chi, and 張淑姬. "A Study of the Regulation of Genetically Modified Food." Thesis, 2005. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/37393434028375251506.
Full text國立中興大學
科技管理研究所
93
With the increase of the global population, human beings pursue more and more on the quality and characteristic of food. In addition, how to improve the agricultural productivity and its quality has become an interesting topic as well as an important question. After the Industrial Revolution and the information revolution, preserving food through biotechnology to improve the development and processing of the animals or plants has led to a new wave of revolution-having an impact on the agriculture. In the field of molecular biology, the food based on the application of the genetic engineering technology to modify the gene is called “Genetically Modified Food.” Since the risk or danger of genetically modified food, it is necessary to adopt a suitable management system of genetically modified foods to prevent danger and protect people. In this study, I will focus on the regulation system of genetically modified food. The first section provides a general overview of genetic modification techniques and genetically modified foods, indicating the risk of the use of technology. The second section discusses the existing Taiwan genetically modified foods regulations on safety checks and labeling regulation. The third section reviews the current practices of genetically modified regulation systems in the U.S. and the European Union. Finally, based on the standpoint of management, my recommendations are as follows:(1)to revise the indication standard of genetically modified foods;(2)to establish the security tracing mechanism of genetically modified foods;(3)to accelerate the cooperation between government agencies. In doing so, the food suppliers not only can be forced to comply with the regulations, the “right to know” of the consumers will be better protected as well.
Hsu, Chia-Lin, and 徐佳鈴. "Consumer’s Perception, Belief and Purchase Intentiontoward Genetically Modified Food." Thesis, 2007. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/71906995244717316166.
Full text