Journal articles on the topic 'General linguistic'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: General linguistic.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'General linguistic.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
RASHID, Omar Hassan, and Waqas Saadi GHARKAN. "GENERAL LINGUISTIC DICTIONARY DESCRIPTIVE STUDY." RIMAK International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 04, no. 01 (January 1, 2022): 454–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/2717-8293.15.33.
Full textAbstract:
The first antecedents in the service of the language of the Holy Qur'an were serious about learning, teaching and compilation. They exerted extraordinary efforts that reflected an organized mentality, sincerity and unparalleled dedication which impressed the whole world. These efforts included the linguistic part of the language, its morphology, phonetics and dictionary, and they have in each aspect fruitful studies and precedent and informed opinions. There are several aspects that have contributed to the admission of linguistics into modern Arab culture. Of these, sending Arab scholarships to western universities; conducting university studies and thesis by Arab students in European and American universities; establishing a special section in linguistics in some Arab universities; the emergence of linguistic writings known as modern linguistics; the emergence of Arabic translations of some linguistic articles; the organization of local and international scientific seminars and meetings in the field of linguistics; and the establishment of self-list specialties in general linguistics. However, it is no wonder that others add up to the achievements of the antecedents of theories that deal with linguistic studies, and extract meanings from beyond the linguistic text, all of which is related to the renaissance witnessed by other sciences in the modern era, and which linguists have benefited from in the linguistic field. Some linguists have collected the terms that have emerged from modern linguistic literature, who have varied in their approaches in arranging these terms. I have chosen five of these general linguistic dictionaries and addressed them in description and analysis, indicating the differences amongst them and what distinguishes each from others.
2
Sagliani, Medea. "General linguistic aspects of borrowed Svan vocabulary." International Journal of Multilingual Education X, no. 3 (November 11, 2021): 16–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2021.19003.
Full textAbstract:
This paper presents general conclusions on all aspects related to word borrowing, taking into account the borrowing-adaptation of foreign-language lexical units assimilated into Svan from Georgian- Zan, as well as North Caucasus, Western European, Russian and Eastern languages (directly or indirectly), to determine the ways and chronology of borrowings, which is very important and interesting to present a general picture of the development of Svan phonological and lexical systems. The study of borrowed material of Svan, as it has been said many times, will once again support the opinion recognized in Kartvelology for the great (sometimes decisive) importance of the grammatical phenomena of Svan in solving a number of linguistic problems.
3
Hambardzumyan, Diana. "General Tendencies in Semiotic Research." Armenian Folia Anglistika 3, no. 1 (3) (April 16, 2007): 96–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.46991/afa/2007.3.1.096.
Full textAbstract:
Modern linguistics knows a great number of semiotic researches which focus on a literary text both as a subject matter of literary semiotic and linguosemiotic study. While literary semiotics deals with controversial issues of the style of literary works, linguistic semiotics investigates literary texts paying special attention to the significance of the language unit which reflects the real phenomena, relations and actions turning into a linguistic fact as soon as strong and historically, culturally correlated ties appear in between the linguistic unit as a sign and its referent.
4
Luchkanyn, Sergiy. "THE FEATURES OF IDEOLOGIZATION OF GENERAL LINGUISTICS IN UKRAINIAN AND ROMANIAN SCIENCE ABOUT LANGUAGE (THE XXST CENTURY)." Studia Linguistica, no. 14 (2019): 107–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/studling2019.14.107-117.
Full textAbstract:
The imposition of official state ideology (Marxism-Leninism) is characteristic for Ukrainian and Romanian theoretical linguistics of the middle and second half of the 20th century. It was the leading methodology for solving the problems of nature and essence of the human language. With its help, it was possible to study internal structure of the linguistic system and use linguistic research methods, which are the subject of general linguistics. Issues that are related to the problems of ideology and specific linguistics (Ukrainization, Russification, Romanization, Magyarization, etc.) are not considered and addressed. The subject of research is the penetration of official state ideology into linguistic questions about the nature and essence of language, its reflection in the methods of linguistic research. In Ukrainian Soviet theoretical linguistics of the 1930–1940s, Marism was officially propagated as a proletarian ideology directed against bourgeois comparative studies. Some Ukrainian linguists, following Ivan Meshchaninov (which then was the official head of Soviet linguistics), used the name Marr as a “shield”. They started with quoting Marr in their own works, but that did not affect much the language material investigation (for example, Academician Mykhailo Kalynovych (1888-1949) and others). After appearance of Stalin’s work “Marxism and Problems of Linguistics” (1950), well-known quotes from this work occured widely in Ukrainian and Romanian theoretical linguistics. They were about the class nature of the language, developed the ideas of revolutionary upheavals in it, stated the need for a dialectical combination of language learning with the history of the society. They have been quoted in the linguistic literature of Ukraine until the 22nd Congress of the CPSU (1961). In Romania, they have been quoted until the death of Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej (1965). Only by this time the development of linguistic structuralism had begun, because the linguistic outlook of the “leader” allowed comprehending lingual facts exclusively within the framework of comparative-historical and descriptive paradigm.
5
Kosovych, O. V. "Terminology of French linguistics and linguistic synergetics." PROBLEMS OF SEMANTICS, PRAGMATICS AND COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, no. 36 (2019): 129–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2663-6530.2019.36.10.
Full textAbstract:
In the article on the base of the linguistic synergetics concept of G. G. Piotrovsky the problems of French linguistics metalanguage, issues of linguistic terminology are examined. The author emphasizes that the metalanguage of linguistics is a complex phenomenon, which, on the one hand, there are the system relations between terms, on the other one there are general academic vocabulary, words and phrases that are used when describing various aspects of linguistic research. Terminology of linguistics requires a special effort in the studying, because the object-language and metalanguage coincide in terms of expression, that is, have the same substance. The article presents the analysis of the metalanguage state of French linguistics, which is a diachronic interweaving of numerous schools and directions, author’s theories and concepts; the distinctive features of the French linguistic terminology are examined. It is noted that in the semiotic aspect the French linguistic terminology is characterized by the following properties: French linguistic term is a simple or complex sign that in the framework of French lingui stics embodies a linguistic concept in its meaning. Terminological field of French linguistics meets the semantic space that is a counterpart of the French linguistics as a special subject area and includes the totality of semantic fields of general lingui stic, grammatical, phonetic, phonological and lexicological terms.
6
Koberidze, Mariam. "GENERAL LINGUISTIC ASSESSMENT OF SYNTACTIC THEORIES OF STRUCTURALIZM IN GEORGIAN LINGUISTICS." European Science Review, no. 1-2 (2022): 46–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.29013/esr-22-1.2-46-48.
Full text
7
Koberidze, Mariam. "GENERAL LINGUISTIC ASSESSMENT OF SYNTACTIC THEORIES OF STRUCTURALIZM IN GEORGIAN LINGUISTICS." European Science Review, no. 1-2 (2022): 46–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.29013/esr-22-1.2-46-48.
Full text
8
بلبول, محمد. "بعض توجّهات البحث التطبيقي في اللسانيات التوليدية." Ansaq journal 2, no. 1 (February 2018): 175–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.29117/ansaq.2018.0062.
Full textAbstract:
تطمح هذه المساهمة إلى تبيان بعض مظاهر البحث التطبيقي الذي توجّهه اهتمامات اللسانيات التوليدية، وهو بحث يصدق عليه وصف اللسانيات المُطبّقة (linguistic applied). أما اللسانيات التطبيقة (applied linguistic) فتتحدّد بمُخرجاتها التقنية والصناعية شأنها شأن الفيزياء والكيمياء التطبيقيتين. بالاستناد إلى هذا التمييز، تسعى الدراسة، من خلال استعراض النقاش العلمي الذي يهيمن في الأوساط العلمية حاليا، إلى توضيح كيفيات رسم فرْضية الأساس الفطري للمعرفة اللغوية خريطةا لبحثَ التجريبي الذي يرصد مظاهر النحوية بدراسته الميدانية لحالات موسومة (marked)؛ من ذلك، مثلا، أبحاث بيكِرتون D. Bickerton في إطار فرضيته المسمّاة: البرنامج الأحيائي (bioprogram) التي تبلورت في سياق الدراسة الميدانية-التجريبية لمسار تَحوُّل الرّطانات (pidgin) عبر الأجيال إلى لغات مزيج (creole) ذات بنية نحوية غنية. وقد ساعدت هذه الأبحاث الميدانية في فهم بنية لغة الإشارة المستعملة من قبل الصّمّ-البُكم من خلال دراسة حالة نيكارغوا وقدمت براهين تجريبية لفائدة أطروحة الفطرية. وغرضنا، من هذا، تحقيق غايتين، أولاهما تحديد محتوى معقول لما اصطلحنا على تسميته باللسانيات المُطبّقة. أمّا الغاية الثانية، وهي التي يُحقّقها القسم الثاني من هذه المقالة، فتتوخى عرض مناقشة تشومسكي لأعمال اللسانيات المطبّقة -التي تبنّت إمّا مُقاربة عُضوية للملكة اللغوية وإما مقاربة إيثولوجية (ethology)- في أفق دعوته إلى أهمية توحيد اللسانيات والعلوم المعرفية بالعلوم العصبية وعلم الأحياء.
9
KHADRA , Chettouh. "LINGUISTIC FOUNDATIONS OF TERMINOLOGY ACCORDING TO MAHMOUD FAHMY HEGAZY THE INTERSECTION OF CRITICAL TERMINOLOGY AND MODERN LINGUISTICS AS AN EXAMPLE." International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research 03, no. 06 (December 1, 2021): 493–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.6-3.37.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistic research is based on two principles: the specific and the general. The specific aspect is linked to the fact that linguistics is considered as an autonomous science having its scientific characteristics which distinguish it from other human sciences. And given its particular interest in language, it has its internal and external foundations and its own objectives. It describes the structure of the language, seeks to know its secrets, explores its rules which control its fundamental structure, and among other things delves into its sound, structural and semantic characteristics in order to put a set of universal rules. As for the general aspect, it is linked to the relationship existing between linguistics and the other sciences: a relationship of mutual influence. Linguistic research has played a major role in the institution of contemporary Arab critical terminology starting from its beginning in the 1960s. Critical research aims to institute critical terminology according to a system influenced by the descriptive approach in the institution of thematic and conceptual oriented terminology. This article aims to highlight the collaborative relationship between linguistic research and critical research. So what are the limits of this collaboration, What are the linguistic bases of terminology according to the perception of Mahmoud Fahmy Hegazy in his The Linguistic Foundations of Terminology as a model reflecting the efforts of Arabs in the field of critical linguistics.
10
Yakovlev, Andrey A. "Linguistic basis for the general theory of the linguistic consciousness." NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 16, no. 3 (2018): 45–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2018-16-3-45-55.
Full textAbstract:
The paper discusses the theoretical and methodological prerequisites for the creation of a general theory of linguistic consciousness, including a set of experiments capable of testing it and possibly of verifying the validity of some of its points. The main idea of such a theory of linguistic consciousness is a parallel and interconnected analysis of external (social) and internal (personal) factors in their way to impact language which must be viewed from the anthropocentric perspective. A general theory of linguistic consciousness should incorporate: 1. a theory of language as an individual phenomenon, as a group one and as an abstract scientific semiotic system; 2. universal methods of describing any aspects and forms of existence of an object; 3. principles from which the phenomenological properties of the object and the methodological characteristics of the theory are deduced. The provisions of the theory and the underlying experimental research will allow us to determine how the internal (emotions, values, etc.) and external (age, profession, etc.) conditions will cause changes of the word meanings and of their interconnections.
11
Petyko, Marton, Lucia Busso, Tim Grant, and Sarah Atkins. "The Aston Forensic Linguistic Databank (FoLD)." Language and Law=Linguagem e Direito 9, no. 1 (2022): 9–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/9_1a1.
Full textAbstract:
The Aston Forensic Linguistic Databank (FoLD) is a permanent,controlled access online repository for forensic linguistic data. We broadlyunderstand forensic linguistics as any academic research with a potential toimprove the delivery of justice through the analysis of language. FoLD thuscomprises a wide range of datasets with relevance to forensic linguistics andlanguage and law, including commercial extortion letters, investigative interviewsin police and other contexts, legal documents, forum posts from far-right onlinegroups, and comment threads from political blogs. This paper outlines how FoLDworks and its potential impact on the general discipline of forensic linguistics.
12
Petrova, Elena A. "On intentionality of communication in terms of general cognitivity." Verhnevolzhski Philological Bulletin 2, no. 25 (2021): 71–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.20323/2499-9679-2021-2-25-71-77.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the issues of cognitive linguistics, which studies language as a communication tool. The article postulates that cognitive linguistics is an approach to the analysis of natural language, which has as its main goal the study of language as a tool for organizing, processing and transmitting information. The author puts forward a point of view that it is fundamentally important for cognitive linguistics to analyze the conceptual base of linguistic categories, as well as certain mechanisms of information processing. The subject of the analysis in the article is the characteristic of the ratio of linguistic and cognitive modules. The purpose of the article is to analyze the correlation of linguistic and cognitive modules. The methodological basis of the study includes theoretical works on cognitive linguistics and philosophical theory of cognition, for which the priority is the study of language as a cognitive mechanism that contributes to encoding and transforming information. The emphasis is placed on the fact that language serves cognition, which is understood as both scientific and everyday comprehention of the world, realized in the processes of its conceptualization and categorization. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of verbal and non-verbal communication using the example of mental representations formed in childhood. The results of the analysis underline the ambiguous interpretation of the problem, revealing the mechanism of perception and generation of speech. A conclusion is made that communication can be divided into intentional and non-intentional. Evidence was found that the information transmission can be carried out without intention, i.e., not all information can be intentional.
13
Burieva, Nilufar G. "THE CONCEPT AND ITS LINGUISTIC STATUS AND LINGUISTIC EXPRESSION." American Journal Of Philological Sciences 03, no. 02 (February 1, 2023): 19–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/ajps/volume03issue01-05.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistics is the scientific study of language, and its focus is the systematic investigation of the properties of particular languages as well as the characteristics of language in general. The semantic view of concepts suggests that concepts are abstract objects. In this view, concepts are abstract objects of a category out of a human's mind rather than some mental representations.
14
Haddade, Hasyim, Baso Pallawagau, Zaenal Abidin, and Muhammad Zakir Husain. "التجديد في النحو: دراسة مذهب الخطيب الشربيني اللغوي في تفسيره السراج المنير / RESTORATION IN ARABIC GRAMMAR: A REFLECTION OF AL-KHATIB AL-SHERBINI'S LINGUISTIC PRINCIPLE IN HIS INTERPRETATION OF AL-SIRAJ AL-MUNIR." Jurnal Adabiyah 21, no. 1 (July 27, 2021): 188. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/jad.v21i1a9.
Full textAbstract:
حاولت هذه الدراسة الكشف عن مذهب الخطيب الشربيني اللغوي من خلال آرائه المتناثرة في تفسيره ((السراج المنير)) وتتكون قضية هذه الدراسة من الأسئلة الآتية: كيف أسس مذهب الخطيب الشربيني؟ وكيف موقفه من أصول الاحتجاج؟ وكيف موقفه من اللغويين؟ وأمّا نوع البحث المستخدم في هذه الدراسة فهو البحث الوصفي النوعي وطريقة جمع البيانات هي الطريقة المكتبية، وتحليلها عن طريق تحليل لغوي. ونتيجة البحث تجيب عن الأسئلة المذكورة وهي: مذهب الخطيب الشربيني اللغوي قام على عدة أسس منها؛ نزعته الاجتهادية التي تدل على شخصيته اللغوية القوية والبعد عن التكلف والتأويل. اهتم أكثر اهتمام بالشواهد اللغوية من الآيات القرآنية وقراءاتها، والأحاديث النبوية، وأشعار العرب، واعتمد على القياس اللغوي في مذهبه اللغوي. اعتمد كثيراً في مذهبه اللغوي على كتب النحاة، ومعاني القرآن، وكتب التفسير، وذلك واضح في موقفه مع صاحب تلك الكتب كالخليل وسيبويه، والكسائي، والزمخشري، وأبي حيان، وابن هشام، وغيرهم من العلماء. والمستفاد من هذه الدراسة وهو أخذ العبرة بأن الدراسات اللغوية تقوم على التحليل والتعليل والمناقشة مستندة إلى أدلة وتعليلات. هذه الدراسة تقوي الفكر اللغوي، بسبب ما فيه من مسائل نحوية ولغوية دقيقة.كلمة السر: الخطيب الشربيني، السراج المنير، مذهب لغويABSTRACTThis study aims to reveal the linguistic flow of Khatib El-Sherbiny through his opinions scattered in the book El-Siraj El-Munir. This research uses descriptive qualitative method, data collection uses library research method and data analysis uses linguistic analysis. The results showed that Khatib Al-Sherbiny's linguistic school was based on several principles, including his ijtihad tendency to show that he had a strong linguistic personality and was far from affection and interpretation (ta'wil). Khatib Al-Sherbiny is very concerned with linguistic evidence derived from the verses of the Qur'an and its reading models, hadith, Arabic poetry, and uses analogies (qiyas) in his linguistic flow. Khatib Al-Sherbiny sticks to books written by linguists and commentators in his linguistic stream. This is evident through his attitude towards linguistics and commentators such as Al-Khalil, Sibawaih, Al-Kisaiy, Al-Zamakhsyariy, Abu Hayyan, Ibn Hisham and others. The implication of this research is to learn that linguistic studies are based on analysis, reasoning and discussion based on authentic arguments. This research strengthens linguistic thinking and analysis because it includes targeted linguistic problems.Keywords: Khatib El-Sherbiny; El-Siraj El-Munir; Linguistic ConceptABSTRAKPenelitian ini berupaya mengungkap aliran linguistik Khatib El-Sherbiny melalui pendapatnya yang bertebaran di dalam kitab El-Siraj El-Munir. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif, metode pengumpulan data bersifat penelitian kepustakaan dan analisis data mempergunakan analisis linguistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Aliran linguistik Khatib Al-Sherbiny berdasrkan pada beberapa prinsip, termasuk kecenderungan ijtihadnya menunjukkan beliau memiliki personal linguistik yang kuat dan jauh dari afektasi dan interpretasi (ta'wil). Khatib Al-Sherbiny sangat peduli pada bukti-bukti linguistik yang berasal dari ayat-ayat Al-Quran dan model bacaannya, hadis, dan puisi Arab, serta mempergunakan analogi (qiyas) dalam aliran linguistiknya. Khatib Al-Sherbiny berpegang teguh pada buku karangan para pakar linguistik dan pakar tafsir di dalam aliran linguistiknya. Hal tersebut terbukti melalui sikap beliau terhadap para pakar linguistik dan tafsir seperti Al-Khalil, Sibawaih, Al-Kisaiy, Al-Zamakhsyariy, Abu Hayyan, Ibn Hisyam dan lain-lain. Implikasi penelitian ini adalah menjadikan pelajaran bahwa studi-studi lingusitik itu berdasarkan analisis, penalaran dan diskusi berlandaskan dalil yang otentik. Penelitian ini memperkuat pemikiran dan analisis linguistik karena di dalamnya mencakup problematika linguistik yang tepat sasaran.
15
Ng, Eve. "Linguistics and ‘The Linguistic Turn’: Language, Reality, and Knowledge." Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 24, no. 1 (August 25, 1998): 173. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v24i1.1230.
Full text
16
Shpilnaya, N. N. "DIALOGICAL LINGUISTICS IN RUSSIA: THE HISTORY OF FORMATION AND THE CURRENT STATUS." Culture and Text, no. 44 (2021): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2021-1-159-173.
Full textAbstract:
The article is an outline of the development of Dialogical Linguistics in Russia. It represents its milestones of formation and the current state. Dialogical Linguistics is considered to be an integral linguistic branch, claiming the status of a distinct «research program» and comprises such sections as follows: Linguistics of Dialogical Text, Linguistic Theory of Replication, Interactional Theory of Dialogue, General Theory of Dialogue. In the final part of the article, the principles of dialogical modeling of linguistic objects are being formulated.
17
Kuźniak, Marek, and Maciej Litwin. "Pathways to Transition: Jan Cygan and the Neo-Philological Tradition." Anglica Wratislaviensia 60 (December 30, 2022): 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/0301-7966.60.3.
Full textAbstract:
Jan Cygan’s (1927–2021) linguistic thinking laid out in 1976 relied on self-contained form-based structuralism, but it also incorporated elements of emerging context-based structuralism. As such, it was animated by concepts that effectively implied divergent views on the foundational postulate of linguistic arbitrariness underlying structural linguistics. Cygan approached the inner tensions of changing linguistic paradigms in a manner that may be studied as a case in linguistic ethics. This ethic manifests itself in an attitude toward the linguistic fact, as discussed through the lenses of a linguistic model. Today, it is possible to comment on the period of transition in question, falling back on the achievements of cognitive linguistics. Cygan’s stance may be interpreted in terms of the IN-OUT conceptual schema. This interpretation not only highlights the merits of the position emerging from Cygan’s 1976 general linguistics introduction, but it also views this position as a solution to a more fundamental problem facing linguistic ethics today and in the future.
18
Minchenko, O. V. "Legal and linguistic theory as a component of general and theoretical legal science: propedeutic aspect." Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, no. 63 (August 9, 2021): 22–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.63.3.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the topic of application of provisions and conclusions of legal linguistics in the field of law. The purpose of the study is to focus the attention of legal scholars on the necessity to consider legal and linguistic theory as a component of general and theoretical legal science.
It is drawn attention that in the research of domestic scholars the connection between law and language is mainly highlighted by focusing on one of the aspects: either the legal basis of language functioning, or the linguistic features of law terminology system. It is emphasized that legal and linguistic theory (as well as legal linguistics) provides not two subjects of knowledge with an emphasis on one of them, but it is a dual subject - language and law; symbolic nature of law.
The factors that influenced the genesis and development of legal and linguistic theory as a component of modern jurisprudence are presented and analyzed. First, it is globalization and integration processes, providing for the necessity to harmonize regulations, the correct translation of legitimate rules of conduct into the appropriate language, etc. Secondly, it is the borrowing of forreign concepts into the national legal system, which also stipulates an adequate understanding of their content, and phenomena denoted by the term. Partly in this context, the interdisciplinarity of modern knowledge is noted (processes of integration and differentiation of knowledge, is a factor in the interdisciplinary borrowing of concepts and categories). Secondly, it is a “linguistic turn” that marked the rejection of the prevalence of the metaphysics of consciousness and the intention of thinkers on the linguistic quintessence of cogito. Language began to be perceived as the basis of cognitive activity, thinking; the attention of scientists has shifted to the epistemology of senses and meanings.
It is concluded that in response to the challenges of society, since the second half of the twentieth century, a new field of interdisciplinary research - legal linguistics - has been conceptualized. This interdisciplinary field is crucial in the field of law, based on the social and cultural essence of this regulator of social relations. Language, as well as law, being an element of the culture of the society, influence the perception of social values, their formation. In the context of globalization, a significant part of legal phenomena and processes can be known precisely by means of the use of epistemological tools of legal linguistics.
19
КОСМЕДА, Тетяна. "Лінгвоісторіографія української лінгвістики ХХІ століття: жанрові різновиди репрезентації." Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia, no. 10 (December 13, 2022): 75–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.31338/2299-7237suv.10.5.
Full textAbstract:
The paper discusses the principle of anthropocentrism and nation-centrism in relation to the presentation of the theoretical foundations of Ukrainian linguistic historiography, based on national traditions and new approaches to the principles of describing the history of linguistics. It is signifi cant for reconsidering Ukrainian linguistic philosophy and philosophy of science in general. In modern Ukrainian linguistics, traditional genres of historiography are updated (index, biobibliography, textbook, monographs, scientific articles, etc.) on the history of Ukrainian linguistics in general, research centers and schools in particular, descriptions of achievements in certain fields of the Ukrainian linguistic studies, etc.) and new hybrid genres (metabibliographic manuals, bibliography of individual journals, textbooks in some scientific fields, dictionaries of personalities, etc.). In the modern scientific space the formation and development of critical-respecting discourse as well as linguistics of personalities can be observed.
20
Kopotev, Mikhail V. "SOME THOUGHTS ON CORPUS AND GENERAL LINGUISTICS." Philological Class 26, no. 2 (2021): 90–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.51762/1fk-2021-26-02-07.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to a discussion of dominant approaches developed within the framework of Corpus Linguistics (CL) and their influence on the general theory of language. Based on the research co-authored with his colleagues, the author describes three approaches to linguistic research in CL. First, corpus-informed analysis assumes that the data collected in the corpus are used as a source of examples in a natural language. Second, corpus-based analysis presupposes that the data are examined not only qualitatively but also quantitatively. Third, corpus-driven analysis assumes that the research task is to create an algorithm for data processing, the results of which require theoretical interpretation or practical application. The article concludes with a discussion of those implications that CL brings into the general understanding of language. The most important of them are: reduction of the role of introspection, increase of attention to peripheral linguistic phenomena, and reliance on quantitative data. It is still too early to sum up the impact of corpus linguistics on the general theory of language, but it is already clear that syntagmatic connections, in particular idiomatization in a broad sense, have moved into the focus of linguistic attention and are recognized as one of the main phenomena of language and its evolution. Moreover, an adequate description of a language is not limited to the rules of interaction of units divided into levels, but the description of all – both individual and the most general – probabilistic parameters of use, representing a single continuum in which the division into language and speech is conventional.
21
Seidl-Péch, Olívia. "Zu theoretischen und praktischen Aspekten des Fachübersetzens." Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 9, no. 3 (December 1, 2017): 135–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2017-0034.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractIn the past few decades, it has extensively been written about corpus linguistics, which has owned its upswing mainly to the use of electronic corpora since the 1960s (Brown Corpus). Meanwhile, an increasing number of fields within general and applied linguistics (e.g. computational linguistics, discourse analysis, contrastive linguistics, diachronic and synchronic linguistics, language teaching and learning research, lexicology and lexicography, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, translation studies) have been using corpus linguistic methods. In linguistic research, the empirical and descriptive character of corpus-based linguistic analysis has also been given an emphasis.Thanks to the digital revolution of the 20th and 21st centuries the creation and provision of digital linguistic corpora is becoming accessible for smaller nations and language communities as well as for scientists. Nowadays, linguistic corpora cannot only be regarded as a tool to support language research and Translation Studies, but they also contribute to the enrichment of cultural diversity. The article focuses on international examples as well as on the most significant Hungarian corpora. The paper also discusses the criteria of corpus creation and several cultural aspects of corpus linguistics.
22
Lodarosi, Amir. "General semantics." Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics 1, no. 2 (March 18, 2020): 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.21744/mami.v1n2.6.
Full textAbstract:
This paper aims to explain the meaning of syntax, how the syntactic structure is, to describe the units that compose sentences in English and to explain the differences between phrases, words, clauses, and morphemes. The term Semantics is known from the English Semantics. Actually, there are two branches of linguistics that specifically study words, namely etymology, the study of word origin, and semantics, the study of word meaning. In Indonesian Semantics comes from the Greek 'sema' (noun) which means 'sign' or 'symbol'. The verb is 'semaino' which means 'to mark' or 'to symbolize'. Signs or symbols here can be interpreted as linguistic signs (French: signé Linguistique).
23
Koberidze, Mariam. "GENERAL-LINGUISTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF NEO-GRAMMARIANS IN THE GEORGIAN LINGUISTICS." European Science Review, no. 5-6 (2021): 51–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.29013/esr-21-5.6-51-54.
Full text
24
Turganbaev, Nurmamat Orozovich, and Aijamal Mamatshakir kyzy. "GENERAL INFORMATION on Linguistic-cultural dictionary." Bulletin of Osh State University 2, no. 4 (2021): 1190–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.52754/16947452_2021_2_4_1190.
Full text
25
Koerner, E. F. K. "Hermann Paul and general linguistic theory." Language Sciences 30, no. 1 (January 2008): 102–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.10.001.
Full text
26
Lukin, Oleg V. "Admiral Shishkov, General Akhverdov, Major Shchulepnikov and «Russian Grammar» by J. S. Vater." Verhnevolzhski Philological Bulletin 2, no. 25 (2021): 86–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.20323/2499-9679-2021-2-25-86-91.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the history of writing «Russian Grammar» by the famous German linguist J. S. Vater. It analyzes the peculiarities of his scientific activity and the prerequisites for the appearance of his Russian Grammar from the standpoint of narrative linguistic historiography. Modern narrative linguistic historiography pays particular attention to the periods right before the appearance of new linguistic paradigms. Such was the period of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, when the main experts on the Russian language in the Russian Empire, for various reasons, were Germans, and Russian grammars written by German authors became the most common Russian language textbooks.J. S. Vater is known in the history of linguistics not only as a disciple and successor of J. C. Adelung, but also as one of the founders of Slavic studies, the author of «Practical Grammar of the Russian Language» and «The Book for Reading in the Russian Language». The appearance of J. S. Vater's works was associated with such Russian military and political figures as A. S. Shishkov, N. I. Akhverdov and M. S. Schulepnikov, who also contributed to the development of Russian culture and Russian linguistics, as well as with his teacher's nephew F. P. Adelung. J. S. Vater published his very first grammar of the Russian language in 1808 in Leipzig. In this work, he relied on the «Russian grammar for Germans» published in Moscow in 1789 by J. Heym, professor of the Faculty of Linguistics at Moscow University
27
Kinderknekht, A. S. "Conflict in Linguistic Researches." Nauchnyi dialog 12, no. 1 (February 6, 2023): 45–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-1-45-68.
Full textAbstract:
An overview of domestic publications on conflictology in the field of linguistics is provided in the article. A quantitative analysis of linguistic works on the problem of conflict from 1990 to 2022 is carried out. The linguistic features of the study of conflict in dissertations, monographs, articles and textbooks are evaluated. Leading research methods: bibliometric analysis, publication method, classification method. The relevance of the study is related to the objective need to understand conflicts in different areas of scientific knowledge, as well as the need to study the contribution of the philological sciences to the development of modern conflictology. Monitoring of linguistic works on conflict shows that linguistics is beginning to take a strong place in the theory of conflictology. The analysis of bibliographic information allows us to characterize the main directions of the problem of conflict study in linguistics: contradictions in language and speech, conflict of language norms, conceptual essence of the conflict phenomenon, verbalization of the concept CONFLICT, objectification of reality conflicts in texts, language markers of conflict potential, destructive practices of conflict, ways of communication optimization, legal dimension of linguistic conflict, linguistic ways of conflict prevention. The author’s diversification of linguistic works by types of conflict is presented in the article.
28
Janda, Laura A. "Cognitive Linguistics in the Year 2015." Cognitive Semantics 1, no. 1 (March 11, 2015): 131–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00101005.
Full textAbstract:
Cognitive linguistics views linguistic cognition as indistinguishable from general cognition and thus seeks explanation of linguistic phenomena in terms of general cognitive strategies, such as metaphor, metonymy, and blending. Grammar and lexicon are viewed as parts of a single continuum and thus expected to be subject to the same cognitive strategies. Significant developments within cognitive linguistics in the past two decades include construction grammar and the application of quantitative methods to analyses.
29
Kayumova, Shaxnoza Kobuljonovna. "LINGUISTIC STUDY OF JEWELERY NAMES IN UZBEK LINGUISTICS." Theoretical & Applied Science 115, no. 11 (November 30, 2022): 1094–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.15863/tas.2022.11.115.74.
Full text
30
Yarygina, Elena S., Aleksey A. Mikheev, and Svetlana N. Fedorova. "Linguistic personality and linguistic community: on the question of the interdependence of the particular and the general in language and linguistics." Vestnik of the Mari State University 16, no. 3 (2022): 423–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.30914/2072-6783-2022-16-3-423-429.
Full text
31
Pejaković, Sanela Kovačević. "Maritime English Language – General Features." European Journal of Language and Literature 3, no. 1 (December 30, 2015): 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v3i1.p112-117.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of this paper is to point out at the real role of English for specific purposes and its importance for the development of modern society (where English for specific purposes is accepted as the international language) and that the essential characteristics of English of maritime profession - as simultaneously creative and limited professional language are clearly and accurately defined. Under the linguistic creativity is primarily implied the ability of any natural language to create from a limited resource of linguistic units an unlimited number of linguistic units at all levels- the phonetic, phonological, morphological, lexical, syntactic and semantic level. Thus, limitation of linguistic units accompanied by linguistic unlimited creativity allows linguistic functionality, respectively the ability of language to respond to all challenges of civilization, man and society. With its creativity language transcends all boundaries and is ready to respond to any new accomplishment, invention or appearance of the modern age.
32
Tanwete, Charles Silinda, and Nafari Kombinda. "Object of study and linguistic subdisciplinary." Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics 1, no. 1 (January 17, 2020): 23–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.21744/mami.v1n1.3.
Full textAbstract:
General linguistics is linguistics that tries to study the rules of language in general. The resulting theoretical statements will concern language in general, not specific languages. Meanwhile, special linguistics is linguistics that tries to study the rules of language specifically. This special study can also be carried out on one language family / sub-family, ex: the Austronesian language family, the Indo-German sub-family. General linguistics is a field of science that not only investigates a particular langue but also pays attention to the characteristics of other languages. Linguistics does not only study one langue but also language. The object of linguistic study is language. The language that is meant in this sense is language in the true sense, namely the language used by humans as a means of communication, not the language in the sense of a class.
33
Radovanovic, Milorad. "Trends in linguistics by Milka Ivic." Juznoslovenski filolog, no. 64 (2008): 385–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/jfi0864385r.
Full textAbstract:
In this article professor Milka Ivic's role in the presentation and explanation of general linguistic concepts, topics, theories, schools and trends is presented. In this concern the focus of presentation is on Milka Ivic's book Trends in Linguistics, on its various editions in various languages, extended versions that followed general trends in the linguistic science, from sixties to nineties. The inventory of these editions is presented along with the inventory of the related revisions. The general conclusion suggested is that there is not such an unique example within the framework of the current linguistic production.
34
Rahmawati, Lia, and Ibrahim Ibrahim. "Kecerdasan Logis Matematis dan Linguistik sebagai Prediktor Hasil Belajar Matematika." Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 10, no. 2 (May 31, 2021): 245–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.906.
Full textAbstract:
AbstrakLatar belakang penelitian yaitu pentingnya kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar. Penelitian bertujuan memprediksi hasil belajar matematika siswa berdasarkan kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik. Metode penelitian yaitu korelasional-kuantitatif yang dilaksanakan di SMPN 16 Yogyakarta di kelas VII A, VII B, dan VII C tahun pelajaran 2019/2020. Peneliti menggunakan 30 siswa sebagai sampel dan teknik cluster random sampling sebagai metode pengambilan sampel, yaitu dengan mengambil 10 siswa pada setiap cluster yang ditetapkan. Dengan penggunaan cluster random sampling, peneliti dapat menentukan sampel dari pengambilan setiap cluster, sehingga sampel yang digunakan bisa merata. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah skala kecerdasan logis matematis dan kecerdasan linguistik. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi ganda yang dilakukan dengan SPSS 25. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Kecerdasan logis matematis dan linguistik turut andil sebagai prediktor hasil belajar matematika siswa. AbstractThe research background is the importance of mathematical logical intelligence and linguistic in influencing learning outcomes. The research aims to predict student learning outcomes based on mathematical logical intelligence and linguistics. The method of research is correlational-quantitative which was carried out at SMPN 16th Yogyakarta in classes VII A, VII B, and VII C in 2019/2020. Researchers used 30 students as samples and cluster random sampling technique as sampling method, namely by taking 10 students in each cluster that was determined. By using cluster random sampling, researchers can determine the sample from each cluster, so that the sample used can be evenly distributed. The instrument used is a scale of logical-mathematical intelligence and linguistic intelligence. The data analysis technique used multiple regression analysis which was carried out with SPSS 25. The results of the analysis showed that there was a positive effect of mathematical and linguistic logical intelligence on students' mathematics learning outcomes. Mathematical logical intelligence and linguistic contribute as a predictor of student mathematics learning outcomes.
35
Кульпина [Kul'pina], Валентина Г. [Valentina G. ]., and Виктор A. [Viktor A. ]. Татаринов [Tatarinov]. "Синонимия ключевых слов в системе славистической библиографии как эпистемологические рефлексы развития лингвистической терминологии." Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej 49 (December 31, 2014): 188–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.11649/sfps.2014.018.
Full textAbstract:
Synonymy of keywords in the bibliographic system of the Slavic linguistics as epistemological reflexes of linguistic terminology’s developmentIn the article the features of keyword synonymy in Bibliographic database of world Slavic linguistics publications iSybislaw are considered. The issue of keywords in information retrieval system is examined in connection with synonymy in linguistic terminology. There are established relations between general scientific terms and keywords of Slavic linguistics. Some applied lingvodidactic and lingvopragmatic aspects of keywords’ compiling are also presented.
36
Teich, Elke. "System-oriented and text-oriented comparative linguistic research." Languages in Contrast 2, no. 2 (December 31, 1999): 187–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lic.2.2.04tei.
Full textAbstract:
The main concern of this paper is to develop a model of cross-linguistic variation that is applicable to various kinds of comparative linguistic research. The motivation for this lies in the observation that there is little interaction among the major areas of comparative linguistic investigation — language typology, contrastive linguistics, translation studies, and the computational modeling of multilingual processes as implemented in machine translation or multilingual text generation. The divide between them can be characterized by a general orientation towards describing the relation between language systems (as in language typology) vs. describing the relation between texts (as in translation studies). It will be suggested that with a model of cross-linguistic comparison that accommodates both the system view and the text view on cross-linguistic variation, language typology, contrastive linguistics, translation studies and multilingual computational linguistics can be shown to have mutually compatible concerns rather than being entirely disjunct endeavors. The model proposed is based on Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), using the representational categories SFL sets up as parameters along which cross-linguistic variation can be described. The fundamental assumption brought forward by SFL that acts as a unifier of concerns is that texts are ultimately instantiations of the language system under certain specifiable contexts of use. A model of cross-linguistic variation based on SFL thus bears the promise of opening up the text view for the system-oriented branch of cross-linguistic study, and the system view for the text-oriented branch. I illustrate the model with data from several European languages, concentrating on the register of instructional text.
37
Kazymyrova, Iryna. "ARCHITECTONICS OF THE REGISTER OF THE HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF LINGUISTIC TERMS." Terminological Bulletin, no. 6 (2021): 172–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.37919/2221-8807-2021-6-16.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to compiling a historical dictionary of linguistic terms, particularly the rules of the register’s organization. The importance of theoretical development of the principles of such a dictionary is emphasized, as the ordering of terminological systems should begin with the elucidation of the main tendencies of its historical evolution. One of the dictionary’s crucial components, which ensures access to the reader to the information contained in it, is its register. The article outlines the requirements for this fragment of the terminological dictionary. The scientific expediency of compiling a list of the historical dictionary of linguistic terms is caused by the fact that it will be carried out with its maximum fullness the complete registration of terminological units to denote the concepts of linguistics. An essential result of this work has become a register of the linguistic terms of the outlined period and establishing the theoretical principles of register representation of linguistic terms. In particular, the lexical material’s complexity would enable the organizing of the filling of the register, to reflect the terms variability, transfer in the register its system connections. Comprehensive fixation of the standard variants in the future will allow the compilation of word indexes to the individual linguistic sights. The corpus is based on the register part of the encyclopaedia Ukrainian Language. These are normative from the point of view of modern linguistics terms that represent the subject-logical and categorical-conceptual architecture of the linguistic terminological continuum, such as exclusive linguistic subcategories, crucial universal-linguistic concepts, basic general linguistic categories, unique linguistic super concepts, interdisciplinary linguistic concepts, and highly specialized linguistic concepts. Besides the main linguistic criteria, cultural, historical, literary, and ethnographic criteria for word selection and description are essential. Therefore, the register involves the representative word of modern linguistic terms and all its standard variants, selected from scientific, educational, and lexicographical sources. Filling the dictionary registry should consider that the pattern of variation in the Ukrainian language is very complex and ambiguous, due to the tracing and borrowing of linguistic terms, and instability of spelling rules.
38
Campbell-Thomson, Olga. "L. V. Ščerba’s conception of language." Historiographia Linguistica 47, no. 2-3 (December 31, 2020): 231–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.00074.cam.
Full textAbstract:
Summary This contribution offers an introduction to an essay by the Russian linguist Lev Vladimirovič Ščerba (1880–1944), “О трояком аспекте языковых явлений и об эксперименте в языкознании” (“The threefold aspect of linguistic phenomena and experiment in linguistics”), which was first published in 1931. This introduction is followed by an annotated translation of Ščerba’s essay, proposed here for the first time to an English-speaking readership (Read the English translation at 10.1075/hl.00075.sce). The critical introduction provides the backstory behind Ščerba’s conception of language as a means of helping the reader to understand the connectedness of the various strands of his linguistic research. As is shown in our introduction, Ščerba’s general distinction between linguistic raw material, the linguistic system and individual speech activity (the “threefold aspect” alluded to in the title of his essay) serves as a framework to conceptualise metalinguistic practice and the relation of the social dimension of language to its individual embodiment. An examination of the explanatory potential of Ščerba’s conception of language for general linguistic problems suggests that his achievements lay in formulating a cohesive account of the interconnectedness of language phenomena, identifying the linguistic means with which to understand the social nature of language, and providing a theoretical basis for addressing the practical tasks of linguistics.
39
Paveau, Marie-Anne. "Do non-linguists practice linguistics?" AILA Review 24 (December 21, 2011): 40–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aila.24.03pav.
Full textAbstract:
This contribution discusses two issues: (a) it provides a definition and an analysis of the term “non-linguist“, which is conceptualized as a non-discrete category on a continuum and as an activity rather than as a permanent status, and (b) it discusses the general value of folk linguistic theories, which should not, despite their potential imperfections, be a priori excluded from but rather integrated into the scientific data of linguistics. The article will also present a provisional typology of folk linguistic positions based on recent empirical research on folk linguistics conducted by the author. Finally, a plea is made for a new description of the object of linguistics, incorporating the different varieties and degrees of linguistic knowledge ranging from scientific to folk conceptions.
40
Gan, Lin. "Is Cognitive Linguistics deadly sinful? On the pros and cons of Cognitive Linguistics and its development." Forum for Linguistic Studies 3, no. 1 (September 6, 2021): 52. http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/fls.v3i1.1249.
Full textAbstract:
Cognitive Linguistics started from the 1980s, and it has become a mainstream since the end of the last century and the beginning of this century, which has got widespread attention, with a nickname as the third revolution in linguistic circles after the Saussurean Revolution and the Chomskyean Revolution. According to the dialectical principle of “negation of negation”, theoretical research is always advancing, thus the linguists are beginning to think of the shortcomings of Cognitive Linguistics and new developments in the future. For instance, Dabrowska (2016) pointed out the seven deadly sins of Cognitive Linguistics, which, we think, are overstated and too radical. Cognitive Linguistics has its own historical significance and makes great contributions to the criticism of Saussurean “Linguistic Apriorism” and Chomskyean “Linguistic Nativism”, but Cognitive Linguistics also has its own weaknesses, which are to be exposed in brief in this paper. We have also tried to propose “Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics as a revision in order to emphasize the philosophical views of “materialism” and “humanism” as a basic start in linguistic research.
41
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. "Basque ideophones from a typological perspective." Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62, no. 2 (March 15, 2017): 196–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.8.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractIdeophones are described as expressive marked linguistic units with a dramaturgic depictive function. Although commonly regarded in traditional general linguistics as rare and marginal, recent research on this topic has shown that these elements are pervasive in all languages and that they might share some linguistic characteristics across languages. This article analyses Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. The main goal is to describe the structure, meaning and function of Basque ideophones and to discuss how the Basque ideophonic system fits into the cross-linguistic characterisation of these linguistic units.
42
Bakytzhan, Bessimbayev, Assel Kozhakhmetova, Konarbayevna Nursaule Aitbayeva, Elmira Adilbekova, and Aldasheva Kamar. "Secondary nomination in the French linguistic system and general properties of idioms." XLinguae 15, no. 4 (October 2022): 185–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.18355/xl.2022.15.04.15.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistics has developed in recent years towards taxonomic models of structuralism, communication and pragmalinguistics, as well as towards textual linguistics and, later, towards cognitive linguistics. The shift in research paradigms in linguistics has also changed with respect to phraseology. Each linguistic orientation has posed its own range of problems in the study of phraseology in general and the semantics of phraseological units in particular. In our study, analyzing the main directions of research in modern phraseology, we will pay more attention to such an analysis, "which is based on the study of many factors that influence the formation and functioning of the phenomena of the phraseological system" (Baranov). At the same time, it seems that one of the most fundamental factors is the internal form of the phraseological units, which determines the semantic, pragmatic and culturological characteristics of the phraseological units. This work is based on the functional-parametric principle of description of phraseological units, which makes it possible to trace and identify the polystructural modeling features of phraseological semantics on the French language corpus.
43
Salokhiddinov, Manuchehr, and Oybek Rabimov. "Comparative analysis of language typology and its tasks." Общество и инновации 2, no. 12/S (February 5, 2022): 319–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss12/s-pp319-322.
Full textAbstract:
Comparative language typology is part of the general typology of linguistics. She studies systems of two or more languages, certain categories of languages in a deductive way (from external to internal). Comparative linguistic typology, as the concept itself shows, is a linguistic subject of typology based on the method of comparison. Comparative typology can equally consider only dominant or common features, as well as only distinctive features that occur in languages of the same structural type (synthetic, analytical, agglutinative, etc.) or in languages of different structural types (synthetic and analytical, agglutinative and incorporated, etc.). The classification of the main essential features of languages, and their most important characteristics and patterns, are the subject of comparative linguistic typology. The task of comparative linguistic typology is to create general typological rules and concepts by comparing linguistic phenomena of different languages. Classification of the main essential features of languages, the most important characteristics and regularities are the subject of comparative typology. The task of Comparative Typology is to create General typological rules and conceptions by comparing linguistic phenomena of various languages.
44
Mattioli, Virginia, and Karen McAuliffe. "A corpus-based study on opinions of advocates general of the court of justice of the European Union: changes in language and style." International Journal of Legal Discourse 6, no. 1 (May 1, 2021): 87–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2021-2047.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This paper presents a Corpus Linguistics study of lexical features in the Opinions of Advocates General (AGs) of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Using an interdisciplinary approach, combining legal studies, corpus linguistics and translation studies theories, the study aims to compare the language of some AGs’ Opinions, before and after the introduction of changes in the CJEU’s linguistic regime relating to the language(s) in which Opinions are normally drafted. The results of the corpus linguistic analysis demonstrate that certain changes in the linguistic and stylistic nature of AGs’ Opinions can be observed post-2004. On the one hand, those changes corroborate the study’s primary hypothesis that AG Opinions drafted after 2004 in non-mother tongue languages are stylistically simpler and less ‘fluent’ than those drafted (in AGs’ mother tongues) before 2004. On the other hand, the results also indicate that AG Opinions drafted after 2004 in mother tongue languages are similarly becoming stylistically simpler. These results are inherently interesting in terms of Corpus Linguistics research. However, in order to have a value outside of that field, they are best considered as a basis for more nuanced research questions, which can be investigated through interdisciplinary methods taking account of the factors of production of AG Opinions.
45
Dewi, Ning Ratna Sinta. "Linguistic Study: Exploring its Philosophical Underpinnings." SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education 3, no. 2 (July 18, 2022): 244–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.35961/salee.v3i2.519.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistic is an alternate term that is frequently used in the language term. Linguistics is part of philosophy. Philosophy is the main core of all knowledge that human beings learn. Philosophy and language are inseparable units. The term ‘language philosophy’ refers to the study of philosophy concerning language or linguistics. This study discovers the language and linguistic issues under the frame of language philosophy. The qualitative approach is employed by conducting critical literature reviews on various relevant literature. In critical literature reviews, the writer analyzed the linguistic literature from the perspective of language philosophy.
46
TAKAHASHI, Yona. "General Linguistic Aproach for Semitic Word-Structure." Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan 48, no. 2 (2005): 28–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5356/jorient.48.2_28.
Full text
47
Abraham, Solomonick. "Linguistic Problems in Light of General Semiotics." International Journal of Language and Linguistics 9, no. 4 (2021): 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20210904.20.
Full text
48
Косарик, Марина Афанасьевна. "GENERAL LINGUISTIC ISSUES IN B. DE ALDRETE’S TREATISE ON THE ORIGINS OF SPANISH (1616): FROM THE HISTORY OF LINGUISTIC THOUGHT." Tomsk state pedagogical university bulletin, no. 5(211) (September 7, 2020): 133–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.23951/1609-624x-2020-5-133-141.
Full textAbstract:
Введение. Работа, лежащая в русле изучения истории лингвистических идей, вводит в российский научный обиход остающийся практически неизвестным в отечественной лингвистической историографии трактат по истории испанского языка (“Del origen y principio de la lengua castellana o romance que oi se usa en España”, 1606) Бернардо де Альдрете. Цель исследования состоит в уточнении, на основе анализа сочинения Б. де Альдрете, процесса формирования важнейших понятий общего языкознания, являющихся основой современной науки о языке. Материал и методы. Материалом исследования послужило издание лингвистического памятника 1606 г., в качестве методов исследования – критический анализ текста, социокультурный анализ исторических фактов, определявших научный контекст изучаемой эпохи. Текст XVII в. интерпретируется в современных терминах в соответствии с методикой лингвистической историографии. Результаты и обсуждение. Анализ памятника испанской лингвистической мысли проводится на фоне общей характеристики предшествующей научной традиции и с учетом социокультурной ситуации эпохи создания труда Б. де Альдрете. Пиренейская, в частности испанская лингвистика XVI–XVII вв., в период, который можно рассматривать как межпарадигматический, характеризуется в силу особой социокультурной ситуации, сложившейся на Иберийском полуострове, очень широким объектом описания и разнообразием тем. Основное внимание уделяется тому, как в трактате по истории языка разработаны вопросы общего языкознания. Изучение памятника выявило круг нашедших отражение общелингвистических тем в сочинении испанского филолога начала XVII в.: используемые обозначения языка; функции языка, формы и разновидности речи; соотношение системы и речи; историчность языка; проблематика языковых контактов; тема территориального, социального и функционального варьирования языка; различия диалектов и литературного языка. Автор отражает наддиалектный характер литературного языка. Заключение. Автор сочинения о происхождении испанского языка не ограничивается собственно исторической проблематикой, трактат Б. де Альдрете охватывает широкий круг общелингвистических вопросов. Данный источник является убедительным свидетельством зарождения и формирования в лингвистике эпохи, предшествующей грамматике Пор-Рояля, понятий и принципов описания языка, актуальных для современного языкознания. Introduction. The present paper introduces Russian historians of linguistics to a little-known treatise on the history of Spanish – “Del origen y principio de la lengua castellana o romance que oi se usa en España” (1606) by Bernardo de Aldrete. Aim and objectives. The aim of the present study is to analyse B. De Aldrete’s treatise and specify how certain notions of general linguistics, crucial for its present state of development, were being developed. Material and methods. The study is based on a print edition of Aldrete’s treatise (about 400-pages long). The methods employed are: critical analysis of the text as an example of Renaissance linguistic thought and sociocultural analysis of the historical context the treatise was written in. This XVII-century scientific text and its system of terms are interpreted with the help of modern terminology, as normally done by linguistic historiography scholars. Results and discussion. The analysis of Aldrete’s treatise as a specimen of Spanish linguistic thought is performed against the background of the earlier linguistic tradition and the sociocultural situation in the Golden-Age Spain. XVI–XVII-century Pyrenees linguistics – Spanish in particular – was developing in a very specific sociocultural milieu, which preconditioned its inter-paradigmatic nature and an extremely wide scope of objects and themes discussed. The paper mainly focuses on how Aldrete dealt with general linguistic issues in his treatise on the history of Spanish. The analysis shows that such issues include: ways of naming language; functions of language; diversity of forms of speech; correlations between language system and speech; historicity of language; language contacts; diatopic (territorial), diastratic (social) and diaphasic (functional) variation of language; distinguishing between dialects and languages; the domineering role of standard language. Conclusion. The author of the XVII-century historical-linguistic treatise under analysis does not limit himself to studying purely historical aspects of language. The work by Aldrete embraces a wide range of issues of general linguistics, which shows that as early as in the pre-Port-Royal period linguists were already discussing the concepts and principles that are crucial for modern linguistic science.
49
ABBOUD, Saleh. "A LITERARY READING IN THE LINGUISTIC EFFORTS OF IBN QUTAYBA IN HIS BOOK ADAB AL-KĀTIB “THE WRITER'S LITERATURE”." RIMAK International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 04, no. 01 (January 1, 2022): 577–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/2717-8293.15.40.
Full textAbstract:
Ibn Qutayba (d. 276 AH / 889 AD) was attentive in both the Arabic linguistics and its literature, whereas he hath assorted numerous workbooks which testify his care about, and those who came after, have been benefited from his critical material on the fields of language and literature, this incipit of the research is concerned with reading Ibn Qutayba's linguistic views through the subject of his book Adab al-Kātib “The Writer's Literature” particularly those related to orthography and solecism in the Arabs’ language, and the importance of the research lies in shedding light on the Arab linguistic legacy in the third century AH\ ninth century AD, and displaying the impact of Ibn Qutayba in it, and the objective of the research is to analyze what was mentioned in two important linguistic topics from the book of Adab al-Kātib “The Writer’s Literature” which are: the topic of rectification of the hand and the topic of rectification of the tongue, which they are both linguistic topics that show the prevailing linguistics status in the era of Ibn Qutayba, thence, they are also considered a door to understanding the linguistic opinions that the writer gleaned from his wells and sheikhs. The research deals with linguistic problems related to the orthography and the Arab solecism and phonetics among the populace in the era of Ibn Qutayba, relying on a research framework that begins with a preamble considering both the writer and the book, and then deals with the linguistics status in the third century AH through what was mentioned in the book’s sermon, then he presents some of what was mentioned in his book Adab al-Kātib ”The Writer’s Literature” in the two chapters; rectification of the hand and rectification of the tongue, then epitomized the disputations between Ibn Qutayba and the commentators of his book regarding the two mentioned sections, and the research is concluded with a brief epilogue that presents his most prominent conclusions.
50
Myronova, Natalia. "Language Personality of a Political Leader: a General Approach." PROBLEMS OF SEMANTICS, PRAGMATICS AND COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, no. 39 (2021): 155–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2663-6530.2021.39.13.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers the phenomenon of the linguistic personality of a political leader. Attention is paid to the prospects of a comprehensive approach to the study of linguistic personality of a politician in political discourse, which, as a kind of persuasive discourse, is widespread, and which significantly affects the social consciousness, which exerts linguistic influence on the addressee through manipulative power to make cognitive alterations to the world view. The special author’s contribution to development of the investigated question consists in an attempt to, first of all, classify works on the mentioned problem, basing on the object of the research; secondly, to form such a theoretical basis that will allow me to study the linguistic personality of a particular politician as a variant and as a specific elements combination of different levels of this type of linguistic personality, i.e. as a complex consisting of cognitive, verbal, pragmatic systems of a particular politician; thirdly, to prove that a politician acts as a cognitive-linguistic subject of his own and institutional discourse, where "I – individual" and "I – social" are correlated with "politician – a unique linguistic personality" and "politician – a representative of a particular social institution". This determines the particularities of the linguistic behavior of the politician, enshrined in the texts created by him/her; the choice of language strategies and tactics, which depends on both: specific communicative situation and personality type of the political leader, his beliefs and stands on a particular matter. The application of the cognitive model of political discourse, which includes the characteristics of a political figure as a linguistic personality and the characteristics of speaker’s cognitive-linguistic strategies, allowed to approach some aspects of the linguistic personality manifestation in political discourse. The research of a set of abilities and characteristics which influence political leader’s creation and perception of linguistic works, that differ by the degree of complexity, depth and accuracy of reality reflection, a certain target orientation and the research of perception and generation of speech processes, considered in their interrelation, allowed me to characterize the political leader as a linguistic personality.