Academic literature on the topic 'Forensic immigrant patients'

Mental health services in many countries undervalue the special needs of people with auditive disorders. The diagnosis and treatment of mental health issues in this group of people, however, requires special skills in communication and knowledge of language and, relevant medical, psychosocial and cultural issues related to the auditive disorder. The great variation between these aspects complicates the psychiatric diagnostic process. In addition, there is a remarkable diversity of psychiatric syndromes and special target groups; these include deaf and hard of hearing patients, deaf-blind patients, mentally retarded patients, patients with brain damage, immigrants, forensic patients, patients with special medical problems and patients who have been physically and sexually abused.In several European countries specialised services have been developed with multidisciplinary teams. These teams observed difficulties in the diagnostic process and classification. Neither were psychiatric and psychological scales reliable nor validated, because they needed to be adapted to the language skills of the patients. Symptoms such as auditive hallucinations presented differently. In special causes of deafness such as prenatal Rubella, special symptoms occurred.In this lecture, an overview of these diagnostic problems will be presented illustrated with case-histories. A research project into the validity of screening lists for mental disorders and autism in mentally retarded deaf people will be discussed.

Patients with an immigrant background are overrepresented in forensic psychiatric hospitals. As a result, daily work is impeded by language barriers and cultural differences. Furthermore, general therapy processes have not yet been adapted to this special patient population, and little reliable knowledge is available. All immigrants go through an acculturation process, which is related to their mental well-being. Four acculturation strategies exist: integration, separation, assimilation, and marginalization. The strategy chosen depends on the extent of someone’s orientation toward their country of origin and the country of admission. The current study aimed to expand knowledge of forensic patients with a migration background in Germany by evaluating their self-reported acculturation processes and associated individual and social factors, e.g., the ward climate. Therefore, we studied forensic patients with a migration background from 11 forensic hospitals in Bavaria, Germany. Besides completing the Frankfurter Acculturation Scale (FRACC) and Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES), the participants provided information on their clinical and biographical history. We recruited 235 patients with a migration background and found that the participants oriented themselves more toward the culture of admission and less toward the country of origin than the reference sample did. Moreover, the patients experienced significantly less safety on the ward than the forensic reference sample did. A possible explanation for the patients’ orientation is the lack of possibilities to adhere to their cultural traditions. Patients may feel less safe because of their limited knowledge of German and cultural misunderstandings.

The period 2015-2020 has remained limitless in terms of missing data on crime and immigration in the Nordic countries, starting from the number of irregular and undocumented migrants and asylum seekers, continuing with the underrepresented immigrant statistics in crime. This paper consists of a complex understanding of immigration processes across the Nordic region, establishing narrow themes associated with crime and immigration. The findings of this paper presented five essential links to the criminality among the immigrant population in the Nordic countries during 2015-2020, that were compiled from the majority of the current available studies in this research field. At this point, the paper represents official data from the Nordic countries and a narrow literature review of recent studies, which depicted immigrants as more often suspected of crimes compared to the ethnic populations, assuming that it could have established a false social identity of an individual with foreign background. The reason of that supposition is explained by the findings on migrants to be overrepresented in crime, biased “immigrant beliefs” and yet evident immigrant labelling.