Academic literature on the topic 'Fish, Stanley E (Stanley Eugene)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Fish, Stanley E (Stanley Eugene).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Fish, Stanley E (Stanley Eugene)"
Lieb, Michael. "How Stanley Fish WorksHow Milton Works. Stanley Fish." Journal of Religion 82, no. 2 (April 2002): 252–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/491050.
Full textGangopadhyay, Kausik. "Interview with Eugene H. Stanley." IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review 2, no. 2 (July 2013): 73–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2277975213507763.
Full textStanley, H. Eugene. "Autobiography of H. Eugene Stanley." Journal of Physical Chemistry B 115, no. 48 (December 8, 2011): 13965–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp209728k.
Full textDebenedetti, Pablo G., and Sharon C. Glotzer. "Tribute to H. Eugene Stanley." Journal of Physical Chemistry B 115, no. 48 (December 8, 2011): 13963–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp209777c.
Full textRobertson, Michael. "Snapshot: Stanley Fish." Philosophers' Magazine, no. 70 (2015): 60–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/tpm20157078.
Full textLeonard, John. "Reading with Stanley Fish." Milton Quarterly 30, no. 4 (December 1996): 173–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1094-348x.1996.tb00879.x.
Full textMcCormick, Kathleen. "Swimming Upstream with Stanley Fish." Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 44, no. 1 (1985): 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/430540.
Full textMcCORMICK, KATHLEEN. "Swimming Upstream With Stanley Fish." Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 44, no. 1 (September 1, 1985): 67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540_6245.jaac44.1.0067.
Full textRajagopalan, Kanavillil, and Rosemary Arrojo. "Stylistics, Stanley Fish, and objectified conventionality." Poetics 18, no. 6 (December 1989): 579–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(89)90013-2.
Full textAkin, Ethan. "Show some respect for stanley fish." Academic Questions 8, no. 2 (June 1995): 5–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02683182.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Fish, Stanley E (Stanley Eugene)"
Lang, Christopher Louis. "An analysis of Stanley Fish's critical theory in light of post-modern thought, or, Babel revisited." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1995. http://www.tren.com.
Full textUrda, Anguita Juan Antonio de. "Representaciones de la violencia en la poesía de la guerra war española." Diss., Columbia, Mo. : University of Missouri-Columbia, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10355/4852.
Full textThe entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file (viewed on September 20, 2007) Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
Owen, J. Judd. "Religion and the demise of liberal rationalism : the foundational crisis of the separation of church and state /." Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 2001. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/uchi051/00012232.html.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references and index. If liberalism is a faith, what becomes of the separation of church and state? -- Pragmatism, liberalism, and the quarrel between science and religion -- Rorty's repudiation of epistemology -- Rortian irony and the "de-divinization" of liberalism -- Religion and Rawls's freestanding liberalism -- Stanley Fish and the demise of the separation of church and state -- Fish, Locke, and religious neutrality -- Reason, indifference, and the aim of religious freedom -- Appendix : a reply to Stanley Fish.
Whitfield, Kelly. "Stanley Fish: Interpretation and interpretive communities." Thesis, Whitfield, Kelly (1995) Stanley Fish: Interpretation and interpretive communities. Masters by Coursework thesis, Murdoch University, 1995. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/52839/.
Full textDonnelly, Phillip Johnathan. "Stanley Fish on Augustine, reader-response theory as rhetorical faith." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1996. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/mq20914.pdf.
Full textGibson, Kristopher. "A Critique of Stanley Fish’s Reader-Response Reading of John Milton’s Paradise Lost." Thesis, Högskolan i Gävle, Avdelningen för humaniora, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-36435.
Full textSélsfors, Helena. "En läroplan utan stort tolkningsutrymme? : En undersökning av Lgr11 ur ett läsarorienterat perspektiv." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för film och litteratur (IFL), 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-35132.
Full textGullberg, Beata. "The Hate U Give and Interpretive Communities : How Young Adult Fiction Can Strengthen a Political Movement." Thesis, Högskolan i Gävle, Avdelningen för humaniora, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-35864.
Full textAlsop, James. "Playing dead : living death in early modern drama." Thesis, University of Exeter, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10871/17122.
Full textSantos, Rui Costa. "A teoria em questão: Stanley Fish e Frederic Jameson." Master's thesis, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10451/3747.
Full textEsta tese tem como objectivo inicial mostrar como Fredric Jameson e Stanley Fish, apesar de partirem de diferentes (e sob certos, talvez mesmo antagónicas) tradições teórico-filosóficas, acabam ainda assim por partilhar alguns princípios gerais em teoria literária. Partindo de uma convicção relativa à impossibilidade de uma teoria da literatura que pretenda dispor de critérios de objectividade, de justificação e de metodologias de trabalho universalmente aceites como válidas, Jameson e Fish (a partir de um determinado momento das suas obras) acabam por centrar a sua atenção em questões, não já de índole teórica, mas meta-teórica. Este movimento é, a meu ver, particularmente significativo. Com efeito, o pensamento dialéctico de Jameson (o «pensar sobre o pensar») e a sua defesa de uma certa teoria da pós-modernidade acabam por determinar o modo como são determinadas as condições de (im)possibilidade da crítica literária. Esta passará a ficar limitada a uma identificação de sintomas de «contradições sociais». Por outro lado, e de modo análogo, a teoria da crença de Stanley Fish, bem como o seu antifundacionalismo essencial, situando-se igualmente a um nível meta-teórico, acabam em última análise por se tornar meios de avaliação crítica das condições de (im)possibilidade da teoria da literatura. Com a minha explícita referência a diferentes leituras de Hegel procurei revelar que os modos pelos quais se opta ler o autor da Fenomenologia tanto pode permitir a defesa de um argumento antifundacionalista (Rorty estabelece a ponte entre Hegel e a crítica à ideia de verdade como representação), como a integração da epistemologia numa filosofia da História (Lukacs e Sartre exibem duas tendências diferentes de perceber a relação de Hegel com Marx). Sucede, porém, quer relativamente à teoria da crença e ao antifundacionalismo de Stanley Fish, por um lado, quer relativamente à ideia de uma contradição social existente como sustento de uma hermenêutica do inconsciente político, defendido por Jameson, por outro, podem ser levantadas as dúvidas sobre critérios e fundamentos que anteriormente já tinham posto em causa a possibilidade da teoria e mais particularmente da teoria literária. Em suma, a minha tese geral, é que a passagem do discurso teórico para o dicurso meta-teórico (que corresponde grosso modo, à substituição de um discurso ontológico por um discurso sobre as condições de possibilidade do conhecimento) – passagem essa, que Jameson e Fish protagonizaram, acaba por não conseguir evitar os problemas que esses mesmos autores haviam atribuído ao discurso teórico e à teoria.
Abstract: This thesis pretends to show how Fredric Jameson and Stanley Fish, although coming from different theoretical traditions, share some common general principles on literary theory. They both believe with universal criteria of objectivity, justification and methodology is impossible. This notion explains why they developed a kind of meta-theoretical inquiry, rather than a theoretical one. This move was made in order to avoid problems and doubts raised against theory, or at least, against the classical conception of theory. I try to show, however, that this transition from theory to meta-theory seems to fail as an attempt to avoid the so-called problems of literary theory. Those problems reappear, although sometimes dressed in new garments.
Books on the topic "Fish, Stanley E (Stanley Eugene)"
Eugene, Fish Stanley. The Stanley Fish reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.
Find full textStanley goes fishing. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2006.
Find full text1954-, Olson Gary A., and Worsham Lynn 1953-, eds. Postmodern sophistry: Stanley Fish and the critical enterprise. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004.
Find full textDonnelly, Phillip Johnathan. Rhetorical faith: The literary hermeneutics of Stanley Fish. Victoria, B.C: English Literary Studies, University of Victoria, 2000.
Find full textDonnelly, Phillip J. Rhetorical faith: The literary hermeneutics of Stanley Fish. Victoria, B.C: English Literary Studies, University of Victoria, 2000.
Find full textJustifying belief: Stanley Fish and the work of rhetoric. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.
Find full textVeeser, H. Aram. The Stanley Fish Reader (Blackwell Readers). Blackwell Publishing Limited, 1998.
Find full textVeeser, H. Aram. The Stanley Fish Reader (Blackwell Readers). Blackwell Publishing Limited, 1998.
Find full textThe Bravest Fish (Originally Titled Bright Stanley). Scholastic, 2006.
Find full textRobertson, Michael. Stanley Fish on Philosophy, Politics and Law. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Fish, Stanley E (Stanley Eugene)"
Robertson, Michael. "Fish, Stanley." In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 1–4. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_8-1.
Full textRay, William. "Fish, Stanley." In Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory, edited by Irena Makaryk, 314–16. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781442674417-095.
Full textNewton, K. M. "Stanley Fish: ‘Consequences’." In Twentieth-Century Literary Theory, 260–65. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25934-2_50.
Full textNewton, K. M. "Stanley Fish: ‘Interpreting the Variorum’." In Twentieth-Century Literary Theory, 203–9. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25934-2_41.
Full textDavis, Todd F., and Kenneth Womack. "Stanley Fish, Self-Consuming Artifacts, and the Professionalization of Literary Studies." In Formalist Criticism and Reader-Response Theory, 80–89. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1916-8_5.
Full textJacoby, Russell. "Skimming the Surface: Stanley Fish and the Politics of Self-Promotion." In Radical Intellectuals and the Subversion of Progressive Politics, 149–62. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137381606_7.
Full text"STANLEY EUGENE FISH." In The Rebirth of American Literary Theory and Criticism, 13–24. Anthem Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx1hvm1.5.
Full text"WILLIAM EUGENE STANLEY." In Kansas Governors, 130–32. University Press of Kansas, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1p2gmb4.31.
Full text"Stanley Fish." In Modern Criticism and Theory, 400–418. Routledge, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315835488-30.
Full text"1 Stanley Agonistes: An Interview with Stanley Fish." In Critics at Work, 15–28. New York University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814784785.003.0006.
Full textReports on the topic "Fish, Stanley E (Stanley Eugene)"
Stanley Basin Sockeye Technical Oversight Committee : Meeting Summary, November 30, 2006, Hagerman Fish Culture Experiment Station & Collaborative Fish Research Center, Hagerman, Idaho. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/961857.
Full textStanley Basin Sockeye Technical Oversight Committee : Meeting Summary, February 21, 2008, Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority Building, Portland, Oregon. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/961855.
Full text