Academic literature on the topic 'Fiscal inequality'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Fiscal inequality.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Fiscal inequality"
Utama, Zamrud Siswa, M. Khusaini, and Setyo Tri Wahyudi. "Kebijakan Fiskal di Persimpangan, Pro Growth atau Pro Poor?" Indonesian Treasury Review Jurnal Perbendaharaan Keuangan Negara dan Kebijakan Publik 2, no. 2 (September 7, 2017): 67–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v2i2.28.
Full textJin, Yinghua, Leng Ling, Hongfeng Peng, and Pingping Song. "Fiscal Decentralization and Horizontal Fiscal Inequality in China." Chinese Economy 46, no. 3 (May 2013): 6–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/ces1097-1475460301.
Full textArham, Muhammad Amir. "Kebijakan Desentralisasi Fiskal, Pergeseran Sektoral, dan Ketimpangan Antarkabupaten/Kota di Sulawesi Tengah." Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia 14, no. 2 (January 1, 2014): 145–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.21002/jepi.v14i2.437.
Full textCoady, David, and Sanjeev Gupta. "Income Inequality and Fiscal Policy." Staff Discussion Notes 12, no. 08 (2012): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781475504828.006.
Full textDwirandra, Anak Agung Ngurah Bagus. "Moderation of Contingency Factors on the Effect of Fiscal Decentralization Inequality between Regencies/Cities in the Province of Bali." Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis 16, no. 1 (January 5, 2021): 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2021.v16.i01.p09.
Full textNovelo Urdanivia, Federico. "The mexican fiscal federalism: the permanent inequality." Denarius. Revista de economía y adminstración 2019, no. 38 (June 1, 2020): 17–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/denarius/v2020n38/novelo.
Full textShahzad, Sehrish, and Bushra Yasmin. "Does Fiscal Decentralisation Matter for Poverty and Income Inequality in Pakistan?" Pakistan Development Review 55, no. 4I-II (December 1, 2016): 781–802. http://dx.doi.org/10.30541/v55i4i-iipp.781-802.
Full textFurman, Jason, and Douglas Holtz-Eakin. "Fiscal policy responses to economic inequality." Business Economics 55, no. 3 (May 24, 2020): 113–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s11369-020-00177-1.
Full textDigdowiseiso, K., E. Sugiyanto, and H. D. Setiawan. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Inequality in Indonesia." Economy of Region 16, no. 3 (September 2020): 989–1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-24.
Full textClifton, Judith, Daniel Díaz-Fuentes, and Julio Revuelta. "Falling Inequality in Latin America: The Role of Fiscal Policy." Journal of Latin American Studies 52, no. 2 (May 2020): 317–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x20000334.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Fiscal inequality"
Luo, Weijie. "Essays on inequality and fiscal policy." Thesis, University of York, 2018. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/21362/.
Full textSaith, Walberti. "Essays on fiscal policy and income inequality." Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2017. http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/19701.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2018-05-18T14:00:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 texto completo.pdf: 3073698 bytes, checksum: f5f9e8be423196faa04e740a30557721 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-11-21
Um dos principais problemas do crescimento econômico nas economias em desenvolvimento é a desigualdade de renda. Assim, muitos estudos sobre a teoria macroeconômica tentaram deter- minar quais são os principais modos pelos quais a desigualdade pode ser reduzida. A política fiscal redistributiva tem sido considerada uma maneira importante de reduzir a desigualdade e aumentar o crescimento econômico ao mesmo tempo. Tendo em vista a relação entre essas variáveis, este estudo procura esclarecer como a política fiscal afeta a desigualdade de renda e o crescimento econômico. Para realizar tal análise, nós utilizamos três diferentes abordagens. Na primeira estimamos os impactos da política fiscal sobre a desigualdade de renda e o cres- cimento econômico entre os estados brasileiros utilizando um conjunto de modelos de dados em painel. A análise abrange os anos de 1996 a 2011, último ano disponível, compreendendo 16 anos para 26 dos 27 estados brasileiros. Estimamos uma equação individual para explicar o crescimento econômico e duas equações individuais para a desigualdade de renda, cada uma com um conj unto diferente de variáveis explicativas. Com base em modelos de dados em painel, apresentamos evidências de que a relação entre carga tributária, crescimento econômico e desi- gualdade de renda não é linear. Mostramos que quando a carga tributária corresponde a 23% do PIB, o crescimento econômico é máximo e quando a carga tributária corresponde a 19% do PIB, a desigualdade e mínima. Na segunda, construímos um modelo e analisamos os efeitos de uma política fiscal de redistribuição de renda para a economia brasileira. Especificamente, tentamos mostrar os efeitos de uma transferência de renda para a parte mais pobre da população. Criamos um modelo estocástico dinâmico com parâmetros calibrados para o Brasil. Os resultados mostram que os impostos ótimos sobre a renda do capital e a renda do trabalho se comporta- ram de maneiras opostas em ambos os choques (gastos governamentais e produtividade). A composição do orçamento do governo muda de acordo com seu favoritismo para os pobres. As simulações mostram que a existência de desigualdade de renda altera o nível ótimo de impostos e as reações aos choques de oferta e demanda, embora a política fiscal tenha limites. Os resul- tados também mostram evidências de que reduzir a pobreza pode aumentar o produto, eliminar a necessidade de transferências e reduzir, consideravelmente, as flutuações nos impostos. Na terceira abordagem, propomos um modelo que seja uma versão de um equilíbrio competitivo do modelo de crescimento neoclássico básico, que incorpora desigualdade de renda endogena- mente e agentes heterogêneos: pobres e ricos, nos permitindo compreender esse problema de forma dinâmica. Utilizamos o problema de Ramsey para determinar as sequências ótimas para os três tipos de impostos distorcivos, sobre a renda do capital, sobre a renda do trabalho e sobre o consumo em uma economia não estocástica. A solução analítica encontrada sugere que, no estado estacionário, o imposto ideal sobre o capital deve sempre ser zero, independentemente do favoritismo do governo em relação a um agente em particular. Além disso, o governo deveria financiar as transferências para o agente pobre usando diferentes combinações de impostos sobre consumo e renda do trabalho.
One of the main problems of economic growth in developing economies is income inequality. Thus many studies in macroeconomic theory have attempted to determine what are the main ways in which inequality can be reduced. Redistributive fiscal policy has been considered an important way to reduce inequality and increase economic growth at same time. Considering the relationship between these variables, this study seeks to clarify how fiscal policy affects income inequality and economic growth. To perform such analysis, we used three different approaches. First we estimate the impacts of fiscal policy on income inequality and economic growth among Brazilian states using a set of panel data models. The analysis covers the ye- ars from 1996 to 2011, comprising 16 years for 26 of the 27 Brazilian states. We estimated an individual equation to explain economic growth and two individual equations for income inequality, each with a different set of explanatory variables. Based on panel data models, we present evidence that the relationship between Tax Burden and economic growth and income inequality is not linear. We show that when the Tax Burden corresponds to 23% of GDP the economic growth is maximum and when the Tax Burden corresponds to 19% of GDP the ine- quality is minimal. Second, we construct a model and analyze the effects of a fiscal policy of income redistribution for Brazilian economy. Specifically, we try to show the effects of an income transfer for the poorest part of the population. We build a dynamic stochastic model calibrated for Brazil. The results show the optimal taxes on capital income and labor income in opposite way in both shocks (government spending and productivity). The composition of the government budget changes according to the favoritism towards the poor. The simulations show that the existence of income inequality changes the optimal level of taxes and the reactions to supply and demand shocks, although the fiscal policy has limits. Also, we present evidence that reducing poverty can increase output, eliminating the necessity of transfers and reducing considerably the fluctuations of taxes. Third, we propose a model that is a version of a compe- titive equilibrium of the basic neoclassical growth model, which incorporate income inequality endogenously and heterogeneous agents: poor and rich, allowing us to understand this problem in a dynamic way. We use the Ramsey problem to determine the optimal sequences for the three types of flat-rate tax: capital income, labor income and consumption, in a non-stochastic economy. The analytical solution suggests that in the steady state, optimal tax on capital should always be zero, regardless of the government’s favoritism towards particular agents. Also, the government should finance the transfers to the poor agent using different combinations of taxes on consumption and labor income.
Tyler, Nikki. "The Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on Income Inequality." Thesis, Boston College, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/385.
Full textThis paper seeks to further establish the effects of fiscal decentralization on income inequality. While many major world organizations, such as the United Nations, and politicians are promoting the use of decentralization policies, their effects on income inequality remain largely unstudied. I add to the literature on fiscal decentralization in order to determine if it should be used as a policy tool designed to decrease income inequality. I empirically study the effects of fiscal decentralization by using a model largely based off of Akai and Sakata (2005). I quantify fiscal decentralization with two measures in order to conclude what form of fiscal decentralization, if any, should be used in order to decrease income inequality. My hope is that this paper contributes to the literature on fiscal decentralization, specifically in providing caution to politicians who haphazardly institute policies calling for increased fiscal decentralization
Thesis (BA) — Boston College, 2007
Submitted to: Boston College. College of Arts and Sciences
Discipline: Economics
Discipline: College Honors Program
Egger-Bovet, Nicholas. "IMF Conditionality, Fiscal Policy, and Income Inequality in Latin America." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2011. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/254.
Full textTraore, Mohamed. "Fiscal policy, income inequality and inclusive growth in developing countries." Thesis, Université Clermont Auvergne (2017-2020), 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019CLFAD001/document.
Full textThe issue of inclusive development in developing countries is at the heart of this thesis. The latter revolves around four chapters on fiscal policy issues and inclusive growth-related matters. Chapter 1 explores how government tax policy affects the inclusiveness of growth in developing countries. Evidence is shown that tax policy affects significantly inclusive growth if and only if the countries have a strong institution quality like low corruption and a good bureaucratic policy. In addition, our result shows that there is an optimal tax beyond which, any increase in the personal income tax rate should have negative impact on inclusive growth. The Chapter 2 examines the effects of government expenditure components on both equity and growth in sub-Saharan countries, especially whether it is possible to design public spending to promote a more equitable society without sacrificing economic growth. We find that investment in infrastructure contributed to more inclusive growth in Sub-sub Saharan African economies than others government spending. These results suggest that temporary and well-targeted programs should be implemented to help those being left out by the growth process. The Chapter 3 investigates whether income inequality matters in the periods of fiscal adjustments in Côte d’Ivoire over the period 1980-2014. The results show an improvement in growth performance after fiscal consolidations episodes, but also income gap decreases in the periods ahead fiscal adjustments. Lastly, Chapter 4 assesses the credibility of fiscal forecasts and their social effects in CEMAC and WAEMU countries. We obtain evidence that the inefficiency of fiscal forecast occurs in most time because the forecast deviation is proportional to the forecast itself, but also because the past errors are repeated in the present. Furthermore, a part of revenue forecast errors can be explained by random shocks to the economy. Therefore, these errors in revenue forecast considered as fiscal policy shocks has a detrimental effect on inclusive growth
Vo, Duc Hong. "The economics of measuring fiscal decentralisation." UWA Business School, 2008. http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2008.0210.
Full textNaqvi, Hasnain Abbas. "The Potential Impact of Trade Liberalization and Fiscal Strictness on Households' Welfare and Inequality in Pakistan." Thesis, University of Dundee, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.521658.
Full textAchury-Forero, Carolina. "Essays on fiscal policy and political economy." Thesis, University of Exeter, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10871/14166.
Full textDeemer, Danielle R. "Spatial Inequalities in the Fiscal Distribution of the U.S. Welfare State." The Ohio State University, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1437342124.
Full textPetean, Marcus Guimarães. "Princípio da capacidade contributiva : uma análise entre o discurso da doutrina e a jurisprudência do STF /." Franca, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/182541.
Full textResumo: O presente trabalho, em síntese, tem por objetivo investigar como o princípio da capacidade contributiva, previsto no artigo 145, § 1°, da Constituição Federal, tem sido aplicado pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Parte-se do pressuposto de que o Estado como instituição politicamente organizada atrai para si atribuições destinadas ao desenvolvimento e bem estar social dos cidadãos e que estes, por sua vez, devem contribuir financeiramente para o custeio das atividades desenvolvidas pelo Estado. Neste contexto, a imposição tributária se instala como contribuição de cada indivíduo em prol da coletividade. É justamente esta possibilidade de cada indivíduo concorrer para o financiamento do Estado, ou seja, a medida do sacrifício individual que o Estado poderá legitimamente cobrar revela a importância do princípio da capacidade contributiva como requisito a ser avaliado para garantir justiça na imposição tributária. Neste passo, a pesquisa se justifica para averiguar se há compatibilidade entre a interpretação dada pela doutrina e a jurisprudência da Corte Suprema do Brasil. A pesquisa parte da premissa de que a forma de tributação de Estado pode ser um instrumento de redução da desigualdade e promoção da cidadania e, desta forma, pretende contribuir para fomentar as discussões sobre a justiça fiscal no país.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate the progress of the contributory capacity, provided for in article 145, paragraph 1, of the Federal Constitution, which has been applied by the Federal Supreme Court. The State has a political organization to attract and the attributions to the development and social welfare of the citizens and that, in turn, contribute financially to the cost of activities rich by the State. In this context, taxation imposes itself as a contribution of each individual to the benefit of the collectivity. It is possible that each individual competes for state funding, that is, a measure of individual sacrifice that can be assessed to do justice to taxation. In this article, the research is justified to ascertain if there is any difference between a given given by the doctrine and a jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Brazil. The formation of an instrument to reduce inequality and promote citizenship and, thus, the use of an instrument to reduce inequality and promote citizenship in the country.
Mestre
Books on the topic "Fiscal inequality"
Fiscal policy and inequality in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: University of Malaya Press, 2006.
Find full textAcemoglu, Daron. Economic and political inequality in development: The case of Cundinamarca, Colombia. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2007.
Find full textAcemoglu, Daron. Economic and political inequality in development: The case of Cundinamarca, Colombia. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2007.
Find full textAcemoglu, Daron. Economic and political inequality in development: The case of Cundinamarca, Colombia. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2007.
Find full textHazardous crosscurrents: Confronting inequality in an era of devolution. New York: Century Foundation Press, 1999.
Find full textChallenging gender inequality in tax policy making: Comparative perspectives. Oxford: Hart Pub., 2011.
Find full textInequality and Fiscal Policy. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781513531625.071.
Full textInequality and Fiscal Policy. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781513567754.071.
Full textAmiel, Yoram, and John A. Bishop. Fiscal Policy, Inequality and Welfare. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2003.
Find full textAmiel, Yoram, and John A. Bishop, eds. Fiscal Policy, Inequality and Welfare. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1049-2585(2003)10.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Fiscal inequality"
Battisti, Michele, and Joseph Zeira. "The Effects of Fiscal Redistribution." In Inequality and Growth: Patterns and Policy, 201–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137554543_7.
Full textMorroni, Mario. "Why Fiscal Austerity?" In What Is the Truth About the Great Recession and Increasing Inequality?, 47–63. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98621-0_4.
Full textLin, Tingjin. "Personnel Rules, Fiscal Dependency and Education Inequality." In The Politics of Financing Education in China, 93–131. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137009166_5.
Full textNkurunziza, Janvier D. "Inequality and Post-Conflict Fiscal Policies in Burundi." In Horizontal Inequalities and Post-Conflict Development, 209–29. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230348622_9.
Full textAbad, Leticia Arroyo, and Peter H. Lindert. "Fiscal Redistribution in Latin America Since the Nineteenth Century." In Has Latin American Inequality Changed Direction?, 243–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44621-9_11.
Full textClifton, Judith, Daniel Díaz-Fuentes, and Julio Revuelta. "Fiscal Policy and Inequality in Latin America, 1960–2012." In Has Latin American Inequality Changed Direction?, 387–406. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44621-9_16.
Full textDi Tullio, Matteo. "Dinamiche della disuguaglianza economica nella Repubblica di Venezia: fonti e metodi d’indagine a partire dal caso padovano." In Disuguaglianza economica nelle società preindustriali: cause ed effetti / Economic inequality in pre-industrial societies: causes and effect, 65–81. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-053-5.09.
Full textCastellucci, Laura, Alessio D’Amato, and Mariangela Zoli. "Environmental Quality and Income Inequality: The Impact of Redistribution on Direct Household Emissions in Italy." In Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform, 123–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230392403_5.
Full textGumata, Nombulelo, and Eliphas Ndou. "The Minimum Wage, Income Inequality and the Price-Stability Mandate." In Labour Market and Fiscal Policy Adjustments to Shocks, 113–26. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66520-7_7.
Full textMarjit, Sugata, Anjan Mukherji, and Sandip Sarkar. "Pareto Efficiency, Inequality and Distribution Neutral Fiscal Policy—An Overview." In New Economic Windows, 191–202. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11364-3_13.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Fiscal inequality"
Soejoto, Ady, Dhiah Fitrayati, Muhammad Abdul Ghofur, and Lucky Rachmawati. "Does Fiscal Decentralization Affect Education Inequality?" In 2nd International Conference on Economic Education and Entrepreneurship. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0006880100300035.
Full textHan, Li-Hua. "Fiscal decentralization and urban-rural income inequality in China." In 2009 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icmse.2009.5318211.
Full textSaruç, Naci Tolga, İsa Sağbaş, and Recep Yorulmaz. "The Impact of Tax Apportionment on Fiscal Equalization: A Case Study of Turkish Metropolitan Municipalities." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c09.01968.
Full textRidwan, Muchammad Mufti, M. Pudjihardjo, and Mohamad Khusaini. "Analysis of Regency / City Fiscal Inequality in Java: Impact of the Central Balance Fund." In 23rd Asian Forum of Business Education(AFBE 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200606.071.
Full textWang, Duoduo, and Mengtao Wang. "FDI, Fiscal Decentralization and Income Inequality in China Evidence from 1996-2012 Provincial Panel Data." In International Conference on Education, Management, Computer and Society. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/emcs-16.2016.123.
Full textHiktaop, Kristianus, Ade Sembiring, and Agus Romdioni. "Analysis Impact Of Fiscal Capacity Direct Expenditure And Social Inequality Between Regions In Papua Province." In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science 2019 (ICSS 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icss-19.2019.195.
Full textDjirimu, Mohamad Ahlis, Haerul Anam, Zainal Arifin, and Andi Darmawati Tombolututu. "Analysis of Fiscal Decentralization Effect, Economic Growth, Regional Tax and Labor on Income Inequality in Central Sulawesi Province in 2011-2017 Period." In 1st Paris Van Java International Seminar on Health, Economics, Social Science and Humanities (PVJ-ISHESSH 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210304.007.
Full textVelkovska, Ivana. "THE COST OF NEGATIVE INCOME TAX AS A FISCAL MEASURE TO TACKLE POVERTY IN NORTH MACEDONIA." In Economic and Business Trends Shaping the Future. Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Faculty of Economics-Skopje, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47063/ebtsf.2020.0002.
Full textBukharova, Evgenya. "ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF CHANGES IN THE FISCAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS ON THE LEVEL OF FINANCIAL - ECONOMIC INEQUALITY OF MUNICIPALITIES OF RESOURCE REGIONS OF RUSSIA." In 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017. Stef92 Technology, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/hb11/s03.071.
Full textReports on the topic "Fiscal inequality"
Auerbach, Alan, Laurence Kotlikoff, and Darryl Koehler. U.S. Inequality, Fiscal Progressivity, and Work Disincentives: An Intragenerational Accounting. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, February 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w22032.
Full textAuerbach, Alan, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, and Daniel Murphy. Inequality, Fiscal Policy and COVID19 Restrictions in a Demand-Determined Economy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w27366.
Full text