Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Figitidae'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Figitidae.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Figitidae"
Jiménez, Mauricio, Jordi Paretas-martínez, and Juli Pujade-Villar. "Revision of the Species ofNeralsia(Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Figitinae) from North America." Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101, no. 6 (November 1, 2008): 993–1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746-101.6.993.
Full textMarchiori, Carlos Henrique, Otacílio Moreira Silva Filho, Márcio de Paula Borges, and Vanessa Arantes Alvarenga. "Novo hospedeiro e habitat para Neralsia splendens (Borgmeier, 1935) (Hymenoptera: Figitidade) no Brasil." Ciência e Agrotecnologia 30, no. 2 (April 2006): 353–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1413-70542006000200023.
Full textParetas-Martínez, Jordi, and Juli Pujade-Villar. "Review ofAmphithectusHartig, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae: Figitinae), with descriptionof Amphithectus coriaceusn. sp." Zoosystema 35, no. 2 (June 2013): 183–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2013n2a4.
Full textJIMENEZ, Mauricio, Jordi PARETAS-MARTINEZ, and Juli PUJADE-VILLAR. "Revision of Xyalophora Kieffer and description of Xyalophoroides gen. n. (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Figitinae)." European Journal of Entomology 105, no. 4 (October 24, 2008): 751–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.14411/eje.2008.101.
Full textFORSHAGE, Mattias, and Goran NORDLANDER. "The identity of figitid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae) of anthomyiid flies in conifer cones." European Journal of Entomology 115 (March 1, 2018): 104–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.14411/eje.2018.008.
Full textPujade-Villar, J., R. Petersen-Silva, and J. Paretas-Martínez. "Description of a New Genus and Three New Species of Figitinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae) from Colombia." Neotropical Entomology 42, no. 1 (November 23, 2012): 63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13744-012-0095-z.
Full textMoura, A. P. de, and D. C. M. de Moura. "LEVANTAMENTO E FLUTUAÇÃO POPULACIONAL DE PARASITOIDES DE MOSCASDAS-FRUTAS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) DE OCORRÊNCIA EM GOIABEIRA (PSIDIUM GUAJAVA L.) EM FORTALEZA, CEARÁ." Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 78, no. 2 (June 2011): 225–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657v78p2252011.
Full textDaane, Kent M., Xingeng Wang, Brian N. Hogg, and Antonio Biondi. "Potential host ranges of three Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii." Journal of Pest Science 94, no. 4 (April 7, 2021): 1171–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-021-01368-1.
Full textFerrer-Suay, Mar, Jesús Selfa, and Juli Pujade-Villar. "Keys to world Charipinae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae)." ZooKeys 822 (February 6, 2019): 79–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.822.30151.
Full textRONQUIST, FREDRIK, and JOSÉ LUIS NIEVES-ALDREY. "A new subfamily of Figitidae (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea)." Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 133, no. 4 (December 2001): 483–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2001.tb00636.x.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Figitidae"
Mata, Casanova Noel. "Taxonomical revision of subfamily Anacharitinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae)." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/586079.
Full textLa present tesi representa una revisió taxonòmica i faunística complerta a nivell mundial de la subfamília Anacharitinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae), un grup d’insectes endoparasitoids cenobionts de la larves afidòfagues d’Hemerobiidae (Neuroptera). Abans de la realització de la tesi, aquesta subfamília incloïa vuit gèneres: Acanthaegilips Ashmead, 1897; Aegilips Haliday, 1835; AnacharisDalman, 1823; Calofigites Kieffer, 1909; Hexacharis Kieffer, 1907; Proanacharis, 1996; Solenofigites Díaz, 1979 i XyalaspisHartig, 1843. El coneixement del grup era força fragmentari i obsolet per a la majoria d’aquests gèneres. La tesi s’ha centrat en tres objectius principals: i) l’estudi de la biodiversitat global de la subfamília; ii) l’estudi de la biologia i relacions internes dels seus membres; iii) donar a conèixer aquests resultats a la comunitat científica. Aquests han estat aconseguint mitjançant l’estudi del material tipus pertanyent a la subfamília així com llargues sèries de material sense identificar depositat a institucions científiques. Els resultats obtinguts han estat els següents: - La descripció de 2 nous gèneres (Acanthaegilopsis Pujade-Villar, 2013 i Cornaegilips Mata- Casanova & Pujade-Villar, 2017). - La descripció de 35 noves espècies. - La revisió de l’estatus taxonòmic de 26 espècies prèviament descrites: 16 han estat - L’ampliació del registre i l’àrea de distribució de les espècies d’Anacharitinae a les regions Afrotropical, Australàsica, Neàrtica, Neotropical i Paleàrtica. - La citació per primer cop de la subfamília a la regió Indomalaya.
Ferrer, Suay Mar. "Charipinae Worldwide Revision with special attention to Alloxysta and Phaenoglyphis genera (Hym.: Cynipoidea: Figitidae)." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/145637.
Full textLos miembros de la subfamilia Charipinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae) son parasitoides secundarios de pulgones via Aphidiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) y Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) y parasitoides secundarios de psílidos via Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Los charipinos afectan a la efectividad de los parasitoides primarios disminuyendo su abundancia y modificando su comportamiento. Como resultado, las poblaciones de pulgones aumentan y pueden ocasionar importantes pérdidas en cultivos. Por lo tanto, los estudios basados en la subfamilia Charipinae tienen una importancia económica y biológica. Esta subfamilia estaba hasta ahora en un estado caótico con un conocimiento filogenético nulo, con muchas especies descritas en el último siglo y medio pero sin ninguna revisión profunda de las mismas, ni ningún estudio sobre las relaciones internas de sus géneros. De los 35 artículos que se han elaborado durante esta Tesis, doce han sido seleccionados para ilustrar el logro de los objetivos propuestos. Los primeros tres artículos muestran cómo se han realizado las revisiones taxonómicas para establecer el correcto estado taxonómico de todas las especies, los dos siguientes explican cómo hemos actuado para resolver algunos problemas taxonómicos, otro artículo se centra en la importancia de las revisiones del material depositado en diferentes instituciones, cinco artículos muestran las revisiones faunísticas hechas en las diferentes regiones geográficas con el establecimiento de numerosos nuevos registros así como la descripción de nuevas especies, y por último hemos incluido un ejemplo de los trabajos donde no solo se estudia la biodiversidad de una zona sino también obtenemos nueva información sobre las relaciones tróficas de los charipinos. También incluimos un apartado con todas las nuevas especies que se encuentran todavía en revisión y que van a ser incluidas en el nuevo catálogo actualizado y en las claves mundiales. Toda la información recopilada estará pronto disponible en la página web que hemos creado de uso abierto para la comunidad con el objetivo de maximizar la difusión de nuestros resultados y de autores precedentes. Con esta Tesis podemos considerar que la taxonomía de los Charipinae está resuelta y nos encontramos en posición de embarcarnos en el estudio de esta subfamilia desde otros puntos de vista (molecular y ecológico).
Ros-Farré, Palmira. "Revisió taxonòmica de dues subfamílies de figítids i posició filogenètica del gènere "Acanthaegilips" (Hymenoptera; Figitidae: Aspicerinae, Thrasorinae, Anacharitinae)." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/101504.
Full textThis thesis focuses on the taxonomic study of some subfamilies of Hymenoptera parasitoids, Cynipoidea superfamily, Figitidae family. We have studied the taxonomy of two subfamilies (Aspicerinae and Thrasorinae) also studied Acanthaegilips genus, belonging to a third Figitidae subfamily (Anacharitinae). Study of Acanthaegilips: we did a phylogenetic study, based on morphological characters, of the position of Acanthaegilips within the Figitidae, since this genre had a mixture of morphological characters that did not fit in any of the three subfamilies. Through this study were to establish the limits of three subfamilies (Anacharitinae, Aspicerinae, Thrasorinae). The study showed that similarities between Acanthaegilips and genera from Aspicerinae were only superficial, so Acanthaegilips was perfectly positioned in the subfamily Anacharitinae. Later it became a worldwide review of this genus, with description of 11 new species. Thrasorinae subfamily: we studied the morphology of the subfamily, very heterogeneous before starting this study. We found diagnostic characters for this subfamily. Plectocynips and Pegacynips were extracted from this subfamily and a new subfamily, Plectocynipinae, was described to locate them. Euceroptres was also excluded from Thrasorinae, it was suggested that could belong to a new subfamily, but this was not described. We did a review of Myrtopsen (Thrasorinae) and described a new genus, Scutimica (Thrasorinae), with two species. We also described a new species of Plectocynips, and four new species of Myrtopsen. Aspicerinae Subfamily: we revised each genus of the subfamily, with the exception of Anacharoides, and described a new genus, Pujadella, with two species, which was included in this subfamily. Were described 15 new species of the genus Prosaspicera, 1 from Callaspidia, 4 for Balna, 1 from Paraspicera, 6 from Omalaspis and 32 from Aspicera. Identification keys to separate the different subfamilies of Figitidae were done, also to identify all genera included in Aspicerinae, Thrasorinae and Plectocynipinae. We also did taxonomic keys to separate all the species included within the genera Aspicera, Balna, Callaspidia, Omalaspis, Paraspicera, Prosaspicera and Pujadella (Aspicerinae); Myrtopsen and Scutimica (Thrasorinae); Acanthaegilips (Anacharitinae): and Plectocynips (Plectocynipinae).
Kacem, Haddj Elmrabet Nabila. "Écobiologie de Trybliographa Rapae W. (Hymenoptera : Figitidae), endoparasitoide de la mouche du chou Delia Radicum l. (Diptera : Anthomyiidae)." Rennes 1, 1999. http://www.theses.fr/1999REN10040.
Full textWeiss, Ingmar Verfasser], Joachim [Akademischer Betreuer] [Ruther, and Erhard [Akademischer Betreuer] Strohm. "Chemical communication in the genus Leptopilina (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), a parasitoid of Drosophila / Ingmar Weiss. Betreuer: Joachim Ruther ; Erhard Strohm." Regensburg : Universitätsbibliothek Regensburg, 2016. http://d-nb.info/1104480026/34.
Full textNEVEU, BERNARD GRIFFITHS NATHALIE. "Selection de l'hote chez trybliographa rapae w. (hymenoptera : figitidae), parasitoide de la mouche du chou delia radicum l. (diptera : anthomyiidae) : perspectives d'application en lutte biologique." Rennes 1, 1998. http://www.theses.fr/1998REN10165.
Full textStrikis, Pedro Carlos. "Relação tritrofica envolvendo lonquideos, tefritideos (Diptera: Tephritoidea) seus hospedeiros e seus parasitoides eucoilineos (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) e braconideos (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) em Monte Alegre do Sul e Campinas." [s.n.], 2005. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/314059.
Full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Biologia
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-04T03:01:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Strikis_PedroCarlos_M.pdf: 408032 bytes, checksum: 39ce35f69b17d493c1a0b4c4c27bd881 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005
Resumo: A partir de coletas de frutos de goiaba (Pidium guajava) L., nêspera (Eryobotria japonica) Lindl., pêssego (Prunus persie) Sieb.& Zuc., maracujá (Passiflora edulis) Sims.,botões florais de maracujás, coletados na Estação Experimental do IAC em Monte Alegre do Sul; e jiló (Solanum gilo) e pimenta (Capsicum sp.) coletados no Sítio Nishimura Rodovia Campinas-Mogi-Mirim durante os anos de 2002 e 2003 foram obtidos pupas e adultos de Anastrepha Schiner (Díptera: Acalyptratae: Tephriritdae), Neosilba e Dasiops (Díptera: Acalyptratae: Lonchaeidae), braconídeos (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) e Eucoilinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae).Os frutos maduros colhidos das respectivas plantas, goiabas e nêsperas também colhidos do solo; foram levados ao Laboratório de Entomologia L2-A do Departamento de Parasitologia do Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas; onde foram individualizados, pesados e acondicionados em recipientes contendo uma camada de 5 cm de vermiculita umedecida, etiquetados e fechados com uma tela de organza a fim de impedir a saída das larvas de lonqueídeos em estágio de pré-pupa. Cada recipiente continha apenas 01 fruto; para cada espécie de fruto e botão floral coletado foram individualizados 10 exemplares. O restante foi pesado, colocado em recipientes maiores, contendo uma camada de 5 cm de vermiculita umedecia, etiquetados e fechados com uma tela de organza; cada recipiente contendo somente frutos da mesma espécie.Após 35 dias os pupários e adultos dos lonqueídeos e tefritídeos presentes foram retirados juntamente com os hymenópteros e procedeu-se a identificação dos exemplares de lonqueídeos, segundo McAlpine & Steryskal (1982) e dos hymenópteros segundo chave de identificação de Canal, Dazza e Zucchi, R. A. do livro Moscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil (2002). Para a identificação dos exemplares foi utilizado um microscópio esteroscópico ZEISS. A análise estatística multivariada ANOVA foi feita utilizando-se o programa MINITAB (1996).Foi evidenciada a predominância de lonqueídeos; Neosilba zadolicha McAlpine & Steyskal (1982) em frutos de maracujá, Dasiops inedulis Norrbom & McAlpine (1996) em botões florais de maracujá, N. zadolicha, Neosilba certa (Walker) e Neosilba glaberrima Wied. em pimenta a jiló. Neosilba pendula (Bezzi) foi a espécie predominante entre os lonqueídeos em pêssegos e nêsperas coletadas das plantas e do solo. D. inedulis e as espécies de Neosilba são atacadas pelos mesmos parasitóides, todos eucoilíneos, excetuando-se Odontosema albinerve (Kieffer) que não apareceu em D. inedulis.Em frutos de goiaba, nêspera e pêssego a predominância do gênero Anastrepha foi evidente, assim como a predominância das espécies de Braconidae entre os parasitóides presentes. Em goiaba, em alguns períodos amostrados a quantidade de tefritídeos chegou a ser 100 vezes maior que a de lonqueídeos. Não foram observados braconídeos atacando lonqueídeos, nos frutos onde apareceram apenas exemplares de lonqueídeos. Nos botões florais de maracujá, não se obteve espécimens de braconídeos, apenas de eucoilíneos.Entre os eucoilíneos, Aganaspis pelleranoi (Brèthes) mostrou um comportamento mais generalista, atacando tanto lonqueídeos quanto tefritídeos, Lopheucoila anastrephae (Rhower) também apresentou este comportamento, em menor intensidade.Dentre os eucoilíneos foram obtidos exemplares de A. pelleranoi, L. anastrephae, O. albinerve, Trybliographa infuscata Gallardo, Diaz & Uchoa, Dicerataspis grenadensis Ashmead e Leptopilina boulardi (Barbotin, Carton & Kelner-Pillaut), destes A. pelleranoi e L. anastrephae foram os mais abundantes freqüentes.Dentre os braconídeos foram obtidos exemplares de Doryctobracon areolatus (Szépligeti), Doryctobracon brasiliensis (Szépligeti), Utetes anastrephae (Viereck), Opius sp., da subfamília Opiinae e Asobara anastrephae (Müsebeck) da subfamília Alysiinae. A espécie mais freqüente e numerosa foi D. areolatus
Abstract: From fruits of guava (Psidium guajava) L., nêspera (Eryobotria japonica) Lind., pêssego (Prunus persie) Sieb. & Zuc., maracujá (Passiflora edulis) Sims.. and floral buds of maracujá, all collected at the Estação Experimental do IAC de Monte Alegre do Sul-SP. Brazil, and fruits of jiló (Solanun gilo) and pimenta (Capsicum sp.) collected in Sítio Nishimura rodovia Campinas-Mogi-Mirim, Campinas-SP Brazil through the years of 2002 and 2003 obtained pupae and adults of Anastrepha Schiner (Diptera: Acalyptratae: Tephritidae); Neosilba and Dasiops (Diptera: Acalyptratae: Lonchaeidae), Braconidae Wharton & Gilstrap (Hymenoptera) and Eucoilinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae).The ripe fruits were collected from the plants and goiaba and nêspera were also collected from the ground. The fruits then were taken to the Laboratório de Entomologia L2-A do Departamento de Parasitologia do Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, where were separated, weighed, put into a recipient containing a layer of moistened vermiculita of 5cm in depth which was covered with organza, each recipient had only one fruit of each species collected. Were sampled 10 fruits and floral buds of each species. The rest of the fruits were put into a larger box containing a 5cm layer of moistened vermiculita and weighed; each box had only fruits of the same species.After 35 days the pupae and adults of Lonchaeidae and Tephritidae were taken from the boxes and recipients together with the hymenopterans and the identifications of the species of hymenopterans and Lonchaeidae were accomplished. The Lonchaeidae were identified according to McAlpine & Steyskal (1982), and the hymenopterans parasitoids according to the key of the book Moscas-das-Frutas de Importância econômica no Brasil (2002). To accomplish the identification a Zeiss stereoscopic microscope was used, and for the statistical analysis was used ANOVA from MIMITAB (1996) From fruits of maracujá were reared only specimens of Neosilba zadolicha McAlpine & Steyskal (1982), from floral buds of maracuja were reared specimens of Dasiops inedulis Norrbom & McAlpine (1996). From fruits of pimenta and jiló were reared N. zadolicha, Neosilba certa (Walker) and Neosilba glaberrima Wied. Neosilba pendula (Bezzi) was reared from pêssego e nêspera collected from plants and ground; it was the most frequent and most abundant species of all Lonchaeidae species in those fruits. D. inedulis and all the species of Neosilba found, were attacked by the same Eucoilinae parasitoids except for Odontosema albinerve (Kieffer) that did not attack D. inedulis. In goiaba, êspera and pêsego the most abundant genus was Anastrepha, and so was the Braconidae among the parasitoids found. In goiaba the genus Anastrepha was 100 times more abundant than the genus Neosilba.No Braconidae was found in the fruits and floral buds that were attacked only by Lonchaeidae, only species of Eucoilinae were found in those fruits. Among the species of Eucoilinae, Aganaspis pelleranoi (Bèrthes) showed a more generalistic behavior attacking either Lonchaeidae as Tephritidae, the same happened to Lopheucoila anastrephae (Rhower) but in a lower extent. Among the Eucoilinae were found species of A. pelleranoi, L. anastrephae, O. albinerve, Trybliographa infuscata, Gallardo, Diaz & Uchôa, Dicerataspis grenadensis Ashmead e Leptopilina boulardi (Barbotin, Carton & Kelner-Pillaut). A. pelleranoi and L. anastrephae were the most abundant and the most frequent species. Among Braconidae were found specimens of Doryctobracon areolatus (Szépligeti), Doryctobracon brasiliensis (Szépligeti), Utetes anastrephae (Viereck), Opius sp. belonging to subfamily Opiinae and Asobara anastrephae from subfamily Alyssinae. The most abundant and frequent species was D. areolatus
Mestrado
Parasitologia
Mestre em Parasitologia
Mathé-Hubert, Hugo. "Variation et évolution de la composition du venin des guêpes parasitoïdes Psyttalia (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) et Leptopilina (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) : une cause possible d'échec et de succès en lutte biologique ?" Thesis, Nice, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014NICE4074/document.
Full textEndoparasitoid wasps lay eggs and develop inside arthropod hosts, leading to their death. They have evolved various strategies to ensure parasitism success, notably the injection with the eggs of venom that suppresses the host immunity. Although venom composition has been characterized in a growing number of parasitoid families and recent studies suggest that parasitoid virulence can rapidly evolve, the intraspecific variation of venom and its short-Term evolvability remained to be investigated. This information is however essential for understanding the evolution of parasitoid host range and may have implications in biological control. This thesis allowed to demonstrate the occurrence of inter-Individual variability of venom and to develop a method based on the analysis of electrophoretic 1D profiles and the use of “R” functions allowing statistic comparison of protein quantities from numerous individuals. Then, to study the effect of this variability of the venom composition, experimental evolution studies were performed on Psyttalia lounsburyi and Leptopilina boulardi. Overall, the thesis evidenced that parasitoid venom composition (i) is variable at all studied biological levels (ii) changes rapidly, confirming its high evolvability, and (iii) influences key parameters of the parasitoid biology. This may have important implications in biocontrol and raises the question of the mechanisms sustaining this variability
Forshage, Mattias. "Systematics of Eucoilini : Exploring the diversity of a poorly known group of Cynipoid parasitic wasps." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala universitet, Systematisk biologi, 2009. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-109400.
Full textALIX, ANNE. "Evaluation de l'efficacite parasitaire de trybliographa rapae w. (hymenoptera : figitidae), utilise en association avec le chlorfenvinphos dans la perspective d'une lutte integree contre la mouche du chou delia radicum l. (diptera : anthomyiidae) (doctorat : biologie et sciences de la sante)." Rennes 1, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000REN1B052.
Full textBooks on the topic "Figitidae"
Fergusson, N. D. M. Charipidae, Ibaliidae & Figitidae: Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea. London: Royal Entomological Society of London, 1986.
Find full textFergusson, N. D. M. Charipidae, Ibaliidae & Figitidae: Hymenoptera; Cynipoidea. London: Royal Entomological Society of London, 1986.
Find full text