To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Federal government – Russia (Federation).
Journal articles on the topic 'Federal government – Russia (Federation)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Federal government – Russia (Federation).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Avtonomov, A., and V. Grib. "Main Trends in the Development of Russian Law on Non-Profit Organizations." BRICS Law Journal 7, no. 3 (October 10, 2020): 81–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-3-81-103.
Full textAbstract:
The article is a comparative study of legal regulation on non-profits in the Russian Federation by federal law, including the Constitution, federal statutes, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, resolutions of the Government and Constitutional Court rulings in connection with certain international legal acts dealing with the right to association, and by the law of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The main stages of the development of the law on non-profits both at the federal level and at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as the main trends in the development of non-profit law in modern Russia, are explored.
2
Kochetkov, V. V. "Constitutional issues of russian federalism." Russian Journal of Legal Studies 3, no. 2 (June 15, 2016): 112–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/rjls18154.
Full textAbstract:
This article addresses a problem of the form of government of Russia as a constitutional state. Even in the Russian political and legal thought in the second half of XIX - early XX century, the main debate was between supporters of federalization and the so-called autonomy of certain territories of Russia. The first thought that the Federation allows us to give a legal response to the challenges of nationalism and proletarian internationalism in the Bolshevik version. The latter believed that in the Russian Empire at that time there were no territory of equal size that could exist independently, and therefore to act as full-fledged subjects of the federation. Modern Russia, according to the 1993 Constitution, is a federal state. The concretization of the principles of Russian federalism performed in Chapter 3 of the Constitution in Art. 71, which sets out the objects of the exclusive jurisdiction of the Russian Federation; Art. 72, which lists the subjects of joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and the Russian Federation, as well as in art. 73, which establishes that outside the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and the RF power to the joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and the subjects of the RF subjects of the Russian Federation shall possess full state power. However, the economic, social and political differentiation of regions that differ significantly from each other on the living conditions of citizens and labor rise to doubts aboutthe fairness of the existing system. Endowment of most subjects of the federation, and, consequently, their dependence on subsidies of the federal government, leaving no place for the realization of the interests of territorial public collectives living in the Federation. The current system of federal relations in modern Russia is more consistent with the concept of Russian jurists of the early twentieth century of autonomy than with federalism. And accordingly, it generates the same antinomy in the theory and the negative effects in practice. To overcome them must apply to the basic principles of constitutionalism as a form of legal: freedom and justice based on the recognition of equal human dignity. Federalism in a constitutional state is based on the totality of territorial public collectives having legal capacity. Therefore, no joint terms of jurisdiction of the center and subjects of federation in the federal constitutional state under Art. 72 of our Constitution cannot exist, since thereby seriously limit legal capacity of members of the federation.
3
Dzidzoev, Ruslan M. "The Constitutional Status of the President of the Russian Federation in View of the Constitutional Reform in Russia." Constitutional and municipal law 10 (October 22, 2020): 33–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2020-10-33-36.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the constitutional status of the President of the Russian Federation in the light of the latest constitutional amendments that marked a large-scale constitutional reform in Russia, analyzes the new powers of the head of state in the sphere of formation and functioning of state authorities by comparing the previous and new versions of the Basic law of Russia, common standards of a democratic and legal state. A special place in the article is occupied by the analysis of the relationship between the President and the Government of the Russian Federation, the constitutional formula of the General leadership of the President and the Government of the Russian Federation. The study examines the participation of the President in the formation of the Federal Government in relation to the powers of the State Duma. It is noted that the new presidential powers from the position of a mixed (presidential-parliamentary) way of government may seem excessive, but they look natural from the perspective of the presidential form of government in Russia.
4
Eremin, S. G. "Modern system of sources of financial law in Russia." Journal of Law and Administration 17, no. 2 (July 16, 2021): 42–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2021-2-59-42-52.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction: the article deals with the modern system of sources of financial law in Russia. This article proves that the system of sources of financial law is a complex, multi-level, hierarchical and dynamic formation characterized by a variety and specific diversity of elements, which is not arbitrary or random.Materials and methods. The methodological basis for this research is a set of methods of scientific knowledge: the analytical method, the method of synthesis and generalization of information. The study of this problem is based on the use of various methods of general scientific and special legal nature: dogmatic analysis, interpretation of legal norms, detailed study of the features of financial and legal documents, logical method, etc.Results. The analysis showed that the development of sources of financial law in Russia at the present stage is characterized by the presence of a three-level system: federal, regional and municipal levels, and the hierarchical sequence and their interaction is determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The system of sources of financial law in Russia consists of: The Constitution of the Russian Federation, international treaties and international legal norms, federal constitutional laws, federal laws, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, orders of the Government of the Russian Federation, laws of the entities of the Russian Federation, decisions of local self-government bodies and other normative legal acts.Discussion and conclusion. As a result of the conducted research, it can be concluded that in order to systematize and logically complete the organization of the modern system of sources of financial law in Russia, it is necessary to adopt a single codified act regulating financial relations at various levels of the legal hierarchy.
5
Kositsin, Igor A., Alex Maile, and Yurii P. Shevchenko. "Features of the Application of Measures of Public Coercion in Relation to Persons With Special Legal Status." Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 470 (2021): 235–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/15617793/470/29.
Full textAbstract:
In the Russian Federation, there are categories of public and civil service positions that provide officials with certain legal immunities. These immunities protect their bearers from interference in their activities by external authorities. The President of the Russian Federation, members of the Federation Council, deputies of the State Duma, and judges are protected on the basis of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Federal laws grant immunities to a significantly larger number of government officials and public servants. These include: the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation, the President of the Russian Federation, who has terminated his powers, jurors, arbitrators, the Chair of the Court of Accounts, the Deputy Chair of the Court of Auditors, the auditors of the Accounts Chamber, prosecutors, the Investigative Committee staff, legislative (representative) deputies of the government bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, deputies, members of elected local government bodies, elected local government officials, registered candidates for the representative bodies of local self-government, and elected officials of local self-government in the Russian Federation. Separate elements of such protection are provided for certain categories of officials who are on duty: employees of the Federal Security Service of Russia, the Federal Guard Service of Russia, Rosgvardiya. The declared special procedure for detention (or its prohibition), bringing, record, search, etc., as well as the special procedure for bringing to administrative and criminal liability, is either absent at all or is incomplete, fragmented, and specific, without any reason, for each of the listed categories of persons. The obligation of the police to immediately release an these persons without any proceedings, explanations, or searches entails serious adverse and, most importantly, irreparable consequences. Particular attention should be paid to departmental rulemaking. The by-law must not be contrary to the law. Nevertheless, some administrative regulations, approved by orders of federal ministers, restrict the rights granted by laws. It is proposed to develop a unified procedure for special conditions for the application of coercive measures and administrative responsibility to these persons and its inclusion in the form of an independent chapter in the new code on administrative offenses. Based on a study of foreign legislation, the idea is expressed that it is undesirable to preserve the institution of immunity in Russian legislation, and it should be abolished for most entities.
6
Starikov, Sergey S. "Constitutional principles of the creation of federal territories in Russia." Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law 21, no. 4 (December 16, 2021): 468–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2021-21-4-468-476.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction. During the constitutional reform of 2020, part 1 of Article 67 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation was supplemented with a provision on the possibility of creating federal territories. In this regard, questions need to be resolved about how the constitutional novel should relate to the principles of federalism established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and what the principles for the creation of federal territories in Russia are. Theoretical analysis. The creation of federal territories in the Russian Federation should take place subject to strict compliance with the principle of state integrity, the principle of equality and self-determination of the peoples of Russia; the principle of unity of the public power system; the principle of priority of individual rights and freedoms, their recognition, observance and protection by the state; the principle of compliance with the goals of the formation of federal territories with the strategic interests of the Russian Federation. Empirical analysis. It is revealed that the current version of Part 1 of Article 67 of the Constitution, firstly, establishes the possibility of creating federal territories as a new type of public legal territory, secondly, provides for a special organization of public power in these territories, different from the generally accepted organization operating on the territory of the subjects of the Russian Federation, and, thirdly, defines the constitutional and legal mechanism for their creation: the adoption of a federal law. This norm does not specify the types of federal territories and the possible goals of their creation. These issues are fully attributed to the discretionary powers of the Russian Parliament. Results. Based on the analysis of the scientific literature devoted to the problems of federal territories in Russia and abroad, and the legislation of the Russian Federation, the definition can be formulated: federal territory is a public legal entity that has a special constitutional and legal status determined by national strategic significance, created in accordance with a regulatory act providing for direct or indirect management of it by the federal government, defining the specifics of the exercise of public power in accordance with the goals of creation, additional guarantees and restrictions on the rights and freedoms of citizens.
7
Kim, V. V. "The Concept of Auxiliary Government Agencies: The Institution of Plenipotentiary Representatives of the President of Russia in Federal Districts." Actual Problems of Russian Law 15, no. 7 (August 7, 2020): 22–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.116.7.022-029.
Full textAbstract:
After describing characteristics of auxiliary government agencies, the author compares auxiliary government agencies with the institution of plenipotentiary representatives of the President of Russia in federal districts and defines the concept of “auxiliary government agencies “ (auxiliary bodies of state power). The paper demonstrates that the concept of auxiliary bodies in the Russian legal doctrine originated more than 100 years ago. It has continued in the works of prominent scholars of modern times. The author relies on the regulatory framework in his assumption claiming the primacy of the Presidential Administration of Russia over the institution of plenipotentiaries in federal districts. It is concluded that the institution of plenipotentiary representatives in federal districts, or more precisely — administrative officers of plenipotentiary representatives of the President of Russia in federal districts, not only substantially fit into the concept under consideration, but also have a genuine constitutional and legal character, since the establishment of this institution is permitted by the Constitution of the Russian Federation (reference in Chapter 4).
8
Romanov, Maksim Leonidovich. "Federal government bodies with special status and their public-power characteristics." Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University 2022, no. 2 (November 30, 2022): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.24143/1812-9498-2022-2-79-88.
Full textAbstract:
The article highlights the current state of the federal state bodies with a special status in domestic constitutionalism and administrative law. The key theoretical approaches to the definition of the essence and system (list) of these bodies are analyzed, the achievement of scientific unity in recognizing their specific position or special role in the mechanism of the Russian state is noted. The main differences between bodies with a special status and other state bodies, including public authorities, are identified and described. In addition, the feature of the constitutional legitimization of state bodies with a special status is substantiated, their non-belonging to the state authorities is proved in a new way, state-power specifics and characteristics (evidence) of their competence are revealed in detail. For the first time, the author's position is presented and formulated regarding the admissibility of the formation of the bodies in question only with federal status. As a result of combining the essential features of the federal state bodies of special status, their general definition and arguments are given in favor of the inconsistency of the position of scientists who rank among such bodies as the Presidential Administration, the Security Council, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Legislative “presets” are examined, the characteristics and shortcomings in regulation of the status of the Central Bank of Russia, the Federal Accounts Chamber, the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation, the Prosecutor’s Office and the Central Election Commission of Russia as federal state bodies with a special (constitutional) status are identified and analyzed.
9
Cherepanova, Tatyana S. "Constitutional Bases of E-Government: The Experience of the Federal Penitentiary Service." State power and local self-government 2 (January 26, 2021): 26–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2021-2-26-30.
Full textAbstract:
The Russian Federation is responsible for information technology and communications. The digital transformation of the powers of penitentiary institutions requires a detailed study of the theoretical and practical issues of implementing the constitutional foundations of the digital state. In this article, the author analyzes the experience of the Federal penitentiary service in implementing the constitutional foundations of the digital state. The author considers the international and Russian experience of digital transformation of the powers of penitentiary institutions. The relevance of the topic is due to current trends in building digital states in the world, which in turn requires the creation of a special legal regulation. The article analyzes the experience of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in implementing the tasks of the penitentiary system using digital technologies, and highlights the reasons that hinder this process. The methodological basis of the research is the method of scientific knowledgea comparative legal method. The efficiency of digital transformation of the powers of the Federal penitentiary service as part of the digital state is determined. The author came to the conclusion that in order to implement the basic principles of the constitutional system of the digital state within the powers of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, it is necessary to create a special digital platform, provide technical capabilities, and make changes to the Criminal Executive Code of the Russian Federation.
10
Kozhevnikov, Oleg. "Local self-government as a constitutional value: from the origins to the current state." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2021, no. 4 (December 20, 2021): 49–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2021-4-49-56.
Full textAbstract:
July 6, 2021 dates 30 years since the appearance of the first law on local self-government in the modern history of Russia. Over the past period, the Russian state and the Russian legal system have undergone a difficult path to modernization of the legislation on local self-government and its approbation to actual reality. During this historical period, Russian Federation adopted the Constitution, the text of which was significantly transformed in 2020; local self-government, in addition to the mentioned law of 1991, incorporated all the «joys and hardships» from the federal laws «On General Principles of the organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation» of 1995 and 2003.
This article presents a comparative legal analysis of certain provisions of federal laws on local selfgovernment, which have been regulating for 30 years at the level of the federal legislator the issues of local self-government in the Russian Federation as one of the fundamental constitutional values of modern democratic states. The author makes a disappointing conclusion that the named constitutional value has been significantly changed both in form and content over the past historical period of the development of the Russian statehood. This predetermined the situation of «crisis» of the current state of local self-government in the Russian Federation and the possibility of its «dissolution» with the emergence of a constitutional category «a unified system of public power».
11
Oversloot, Hans. "The Merger of Federal Subjects of the Russian Federation During Putin's Presidency and After." Review of Central and East European Law 34, no. 2 (2009): 119–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157303509x406278.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractAmong the institutional changes brought about or instigated during Vladimir Putin's two terms in office as President of the Russian Federation (RF), the reduction of the number of federal subjects of the RF—i.e., the number of territorial–administrative 'entities' that together constitute the Russian Federation—has perhaps attracted the least attention. However, this policy of reducing the number of subjects by bringing about what is effectively a merger of two or three subjects, thereby creating new federal subjects, is worthy of attention for a number of reasons. This policy is one of the ways in which the Federation's center (re)asserts its dominant position vis-à-vis the 'constitutive parts' of the Federation, which are, indeed, treated as 'subjects' within a more unitary state format. This policy runs counter to what appears to be a trend in many other countries where 'native peoples' (or 'indigenous peoples') are accorded various forms of self rule, often within their 'home territories' ('self-government rights').This article will address the procedures being followed to bring about the reduction of the number of subjects, as well as the reasons for merging smaller subjects, in terms of the number of inhabitants, with larger ones. The possible future of the policy of subject merger will be discussed in the final part of the article. It will be argued that the reduction of the number of subjects of the Russian Federation to merely a few dozen will entail the end of Russia as a federation; by doing so, Russia will reconstitute itself as a unitary state.
12
Sayadyan, Hayk. "Freedom of Information in the Russian Federation." European Public Law 17, Issue 2 (June 1, 2011): 293–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/euro2011021.
Full textAbstract:
Russia's legal transformation includes significant reforms to freedom of information. The 1993 Constitution gives some entitlements, and these have been supplemented by two important federal laws. The Russian law 'On Personal Data' was enacted as a direct result of Russia joining the Council of Europe and came into force on 1 January 2011. The law 'On Ensuring Freedom of Information in the Activity of State Agencies and Agencies of Local Self-Government' came into force on 1 January 2010. These and other moves towards increased transparency, encouraged by President Medvedev, take Russia further away from her secretive Soviet past, although not without some reluctance.
13
Solomon, Peter H. "The Reform of Policing in the Russian Federation." Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 38, no. 2 (August 2005): 230–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/acri.38.2.230.
Full textAbstract:
The reform of policing in the Russian Federation involves an unusual combination of challenges. These include finding the best distribution of police powers and responsibilities among three levels of government (federal, regional and local); confronting an excessive degree of commercialisation of policing; and developing ‘democratic’ policing that meets standards of professionalism, accountability and legitimacy. In the new millenium, talk about police reform in Russia has focused on organisational questions and ways of administering police functions. Relatively little attention has been given to the content of policing and police relations with the public. Significant reform of policing in Russia has not yet begun.
14
Нанба, Сария, and Sariya Nanba. "Redistribution of Powers: Interrelation of Federal and Regional Regulation." Journal of Russian Law 4, no. 6 (May 30, 2016): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/19763.
Full textAbstract:
The article investigates the conceptual foundations of local self-government in the Russian Federation. The article analyzes the current status of the legislation on local self-government. The author analyzes in retrospective the limits of participation of the Russian Federation’s constituent entities with regard to local government. A peculiar feature of local government is the expansion of the powers of public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in regulating the issues of local self-government organization. The article analyzes the legal nature of the redistribution of powers, provides classification of the redistributed powers. The author studies the laws of the Russian Federation governing the redistribution of powers. The author reveals the tendency of the transfer to the regional level of powers, which traditionally deal with local matters. These include the powers to address issues of local importance in organizing funeral services and burial places, disposal and recycling of household and industrial waste, organizing of transport services, forest monitoring, land use planning, and others.
15
Gligich-Zolotareva, M. V., and N. I. Lykjanova. "New Contours of Transformation of Public Power in the Russian Federation." Federalism 27, no. 1 (March 28, 2022): 23–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2022-1-23-50.
Full textAbstract:
Constitutional innovations required revision of a large part of legislation, first of all, the “basic” federal laws of October 6, 1999 No. 184-FZ “On general principles of organization of Legislative (Representative) and Executive state authorities of the Subjects of the Russian Federation” and of October 6, 2003 No. 131-FZ “On general principles of organization of local Self-Government in the Russian Federation”. Currently the process of transformation of public power in Russia has started. The recently adopted Federal Law No. 414-FZ of December 21, 2021 “On the General Principles of the Organization of Public Power in the Subjects of the Russian Federation” is being implemented in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the reform of public authorities at the local level is being developed. Consideration of the project of Federal Law No. 40361-8 “On the general principles of the organization of local self-government in the unified system of public authority” has been postponed. Because of the difficult political and economic situation, the creation of a new organizational management system for regions and municipalities will ensure the development of territories, promptly correcting the process using modern information technologies.
16
Klimanov, V., and A. Lavrov. "Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Russia in the Present Time." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 11 (November 20, 2004): 111–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2004-11-111-125.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers the main changes in the intergovernmental fiscal relations in Russia in the beginning of the 2000s and current problems of the realization of the governmental Program of the Development of Fiscal Federalism in the Russian Federation till 2005. The experience of forming several funds for financial aid to sub-national budgets in the federal budget is examined, financial issues of the reform of federal relations and local self-government are analyzed.
17
Strelnikov, A. O. "Prospects for Improving Responsibility of the Government of the Russian Federation before the Parliament of the Russian Federation under Constitutional Law." Actual Problems of Russian Law 16, no. 6 (July 9, 2021): 46–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.127.6.048-057.
Full textAbstract:
The paper is devoted to the study of the institution of constitutional and legal responsibility of the Government before the Parliament in Russia at the present time. In connection with the implementation of the Constitutional Reform in 2020, the author notes that the legislator has taken the path of strengthening the role and importance of the Parliament in terms of monitoring the activities of the Government. Nevertheless, the main drawback of the current legislation is still the lack of real sanctions that the Russian Parliament can apply independently in relation to the Russian Government or its individual members. Therefore, the author proposes a number of new sanctions, as well as a number of measures aimed at improving the existing mechanisms for applying sanctions of constitutional responsibility. In particular, it is proposed to introduce the right of the State Duma of the Russian Federation to present its own nominees for vacant positions in the Government, the approval of which is under the authority of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, to enable the State Duma to independently release individual members of the Government from positions approved by it. In addition, it is proposed to improve the procedure for expressing a vote of no confidence in the Government by the State Duma, namely, to introduce the obligation of the President of the Russian Federation to dismiss the Government of the Russian Federation in the event that the State Duma re-expresses no confidence in the Government within three months. It is also proposed to increase the role of the Council of Federation of the Russian Federation by introducing the power of this body not only to consult with the President of the Russian Federation, but to approve the corresponding candidacies of federal ministers proposed to this body by the President of the Russian Federation. The author notes that the proposed improvement measures will increase the effectiveness of the implementation of a number of federal laws regulating the parliamentary responsibility of the Government of the Russian Federation.
18
SOLOVEV, Sergey Gennadevich, Vladimir Ivanovich MAYOROV, and Andrey Yuryevich PETROV. "Legal Construction of the ‘Municipal Filter’ for Developing Local Self-Government in Russia." Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9, no. 5 (June 11, 2019): 1771. http://dx.doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.5(35).32.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyzes the potential of the legal structure supporting municipal candidates for the post of a governor of some federal subject of the Russian Federation (known as the ‘municipal filter’) for the development of the Russian local self-government. The authors consider the key theoretical and practical problems associated with substantive and procedural aspects of the existing support mechanism of candidates for the post of the highest official of a federal subject of the Russian Federation. The authors also propose a set of legal measures aimed at improving the legal structure under study.
19
Kozhevnikov, Oleg A., and Irina V. Glazunova. "Protection of the economic basis of local self-government in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Russia." Law Enforcement Review 4, no. 2 (June 30, 2020): 73–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(2).73-84.
Full textAbstract:
The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of decisions of the Constitutional Court of
Russia concerning the economic basis of local government in Russia in order to demonstrate
the special role of its legal positions in ensuring and protecting the economic foundations
of local self-government in the Russian Federation. The subject of the article is legal acts
and decisions of the Constitutional Court of Russia devoted to the economic foundations of
local self-government in Russian Federation.
The aim of the article is to confirm or disprove the following hypothesis. As it seems from
the practice of the Constitutional Court of Russia, the existing system of implementing the
regulatory framework of the economic basis of municipalities in Russia is unsatisfactory,
while the Constitutional Court of Russia, through the development of its legal positions,
smoothes out the negative aspects and sets up legislative and executive authorities to create the necessary conditions for the development of local government and to ensure its
economic and organizational independence. The methodology. The authors apply general scientific methods of comparative, logical and
statistical research, as well as analysis of Russian law enforcement and judicial practice in
the field of local self-government.
The main results, scope of application. Despite the provisions of the European Charter of
Local Government on the right of local governments to possess sufficient own financial resources, the reality shows a very deplorable picture of the formation of the regulatory
framework of the economy of municipalities in Russia. The existence of very heterogeneous
judicial practice, primarily arbitration, makes the situation worse. In this regard, a special
role in protecting the economic foundations of local government is assigned to the Constitutional Court of Russia.
Conclusion. The issues of legal regulation of the economic basis of local government need increased attention of the state and urgently require a deliberate change, primarily in the form
of developing a federal state policy, taking into account the practice already developed by the
Constitutional Court of Russia. It is the highest federal body of constitutional justice that often
acts as the last bastion of protecting the economic potential of local government.
20
Yakovlev, A. Y. "LEGAL SUPPORT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES WITH STATE PARTICIPATION." Issues of Law 20, no. 2 (2020): 73–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/pro-prava200210.
Full textAbstract:
In this work the author explores the system of legal acts regulating corporate governance issues in joint-stock companies with the participation of the Russian Federation and subjects of the federation. The author builds the structure of external (codes, federal laws, decrees and orders of the President of Russia, decrees and orders of the Government of the Russian Federation, orders of state executive bodies, etc.) and internal acts (organization charter, regulations, etc.). Differences in legal support of corporate governance in state jointstock companies in comparison with private ones are highlighted in the paper
21
Шустова, Мария, and Mariya Shustova. "THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTIC OF COMPETENCE OF THE RUSSIAN PRESIDENT, FEDERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE SPHERE OF MANAGEMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION IN RUSSIA." Advances in Law Studies 4, no. 2 (June 29, 2016): 124–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/19651.
Full textAbstract:
In the scientific article organizational and legal aspects of realization of competence of the Russian President, Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Russian Federation in the sphere of management of civil aviation in Russia as most important part of domestic economy are analyzed. The positions of
the leading scientists connected with disclosure of the maintenance of
the basic concepts used in the field are considered. The perspective of
functioning and development of air transport is considered.
22
Golosov, Grigorii V. "Russia’s centralized authoritarianism in the disguise of democratic federalism: Evidence from the September 2017 sub-national elections." International Area Studies Review 21, no. 3 (July 23, 2018): 231–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2233865918789521.
Full textAbstract:
While formally a federation that vests significant powers in the sub-national bodies of government and leaves it for its federal units and municipalities to decide who will govern them by conducting elections, the Russian Federation is effectively a centralized authoritarian state. This paper uses evidence from the September 2017 sub-national elections in Russia to examine the role of formal political institutions in sustaining the country’s political regime. The analysis shows that the political domination of the pro-government party over the regional political assemblies is sustained by a complex combination of party regulations and electoral rules. In particular, gubernatorial elections are organized and conducted in a way that ensures the victories of the incumbent governors who are effectively appointed by the president of Russia.
23
Kornev, Georgii Pavlovich, and Larisa Stepanovna Korneva. "The scenarios for consolidation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation based on the economic macro-regions." Право и политика, no. 3 (March 2021): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2021.3.35156.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of this research is the matters of reforming the federal structure of Russia in the aspect of unification and consolidation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation that are under discussion in the current political discourse. The object this research is the transformation of the constituent structure of the Russian Federation based on the strategy of spatial development of Russia, federal legislative acts that laid the groundwork for the unification process, primarily the Federal Constitutional Law “On the Procedure of Admission into the Russian Federation and Creation of a New Constituent Entity". The authors explore such aspects of the topic as the results of unification processes of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation of 2003-2008, gaps in their legislative regulation, political errors and risks, including of ethnic nature, which impeded planned consolidation of the constituent structure of the Russian Federation, as well as strategy for the future unification processes. The novelty of the author's position is that the unification processes scenarios of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are founded on the declared by the government “Strategy of Spatial Development of the Russian Federation until 2025”. The research methodology employs comprehensive interdisciplinary political, economic and legal approach. The drawn conclusions are related to the description of these scenarios, determination of the constitutional legal status of the new consolidated entity formed at the premises on an economic macroregion, considering such significant characteristics of the macroregion, as the number of constituent entities of the Russian Federation therein, size of their territories, population density, and peculiarities of the ethnic composition. It is proposed to fill the gaps in determination of the status of a constituent entity that ceased to exist as such and became a part of the consolidated entity by introducing amendments to the federal constitutional and current legislation without changing the fundamentals of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
24
Kochetkov, O., V. Klochkov, A. Samoylov, and N. Shandala. "Harmonization of the Russian Federation Legislation with Current International Recommendations." Medical Radiology and radiation safety 66, no. 6 (December 17, 2021): 111–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-6-111-115.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose: Harmonization of the Russian Federation legislation with current international recommendations
Results: The concept of the radiation safety system has been significantly modified by recommendations of ICRP (2007) and IAEA (2014). An analysis of existing international regulatory framework for radiation safety allowed to identify the main provisions to be implemented in the Russian legal and regulatory framework. It’s showed that the current Federal Law of 09.01.1996 No. 3-FZ «On Radiation Safety of Population» must be ultimately revised to be harmonized with international documents. General approaches to legal regulation of radiation safety should be essentially modified to create a strong relationship between this law and other regulatory and legal documents in force in the Russian Federation.
Conclusion: An article-by-article analysis of the current Federal Law of 09.01.1996 No. 3-FZ «On Radiation Safety of Population « showed the need to modify 22 existing articles and add 12 new articles in order to harmonize it with international documents. Given such a large volume of modification it is advisable to pass a new law with simultaneous abolition of the current federal law. A new name has been proposed: Federal Law of the Russian Federation «On Radiation Safety in the Russian Federation».
The enactment of the Federal Law of the Russian Federation «On Radiation Safety in the Russian Federation» with the main by-laws approved by the Russian Federation Government – «Radiation Safety Standards» and «Basic Rules for Ensuring Radiation Safety» – will allow to establish an actual regulatory framework for ensuring radiation safety of personnel and population in Russia.
25
Svetlana V., Miroshnik, and Pukhnarevich Mikhail S. "Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation as a Subject of Lawmaking." Rossijskoe pravosudie, no. 7 (June 23, 2022): 13–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2022.7.13-20.
Full textAbstract:
The authors of this article set themselves the goal of revealing the features of the legal activity of the Federal Security Service (FSS) of the Russian Federation. Based on the provisions of scientifically based integrative legal understanding, using various methods of knowledge of legal reality (dialectical, general scientific and private scientific), they conducted an analysis of the existing doctrinal ideas about law-making, which made it possible to clarify the role and meaning of law-making as a category that dialectically links the sources of law and forms of law. The consideration of law-making as the culmination element of law-making made it possible to recognize that the law-making activities of the FSS of Russia are objectively necessary, secondary, it bears on the one hand, state-authoritative, systemic, and on the other – competent and limited nature, exercised out by authorized officials of the FSS of Russia on the basis of the principles and norms of substantive and procedural law, effectively expressed in legal acts of the FSS of Russia adopted on issues that are within the competence of this federal service. The dynamism of law-making, the universality of its stages are noted. Depending on the final results, it is proposed to classify the legal activity of the Federal Security Service of Russia as full and initial. The development of new formal and legal conduct by specifying the principles and norms of the law with greater legal force is fully meaningful, the initial preparation and submission to the President of the Russian Federation, The Government of the Russian Federation draft legal acts on state security. The article pays special attention to the principles of law-making activity. The necessity of their legal consolidation in the form of legal obligations of relevant subjects is substantiated.
26
Goncharov, Vitaly Viktorovich, Iurii S. Shpinev, Shikhtimer B. Magomedov, Rumiia Bareeva, Evgeny A. Nayanov, and Diana I. Stepanova. "Federalism as a principle of organization and activity of executive authorities in the russian federation: socio-economic and legal analysis." LAPLAGE EM REVISTA 7, Extra-A (May 10, 2021): 417–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.24115/s2446-622020217extra-a831p.417-423.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyzes the most important principle of organization and activity of executive authorities in the Russian Federation - federalism. Russia is a federal democratic state with a republican form of government. In this regard, the authors have developed and justified proposals for implementing the principle of federalism in the organization and operation of the system of executive authorities.
27
Shagoyko, Evgeniy Yu. "On Redistribution of Powers between Local Self-Government Authorities and Government Authorities of a Constituent Entity of the Russian Federation." Constitutional and municipal law 10 (October 22, 2020): 71–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2020-10-71-75.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines and analyzes the practice of applying the provisions of the Federal Law No. 136-ФЗ of 27.05.2014 “On Amendments to Article 26.3 of the Federal Law “On General Principles of Organization of Legislative (Representative) and Executive Government Authorities of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation” and the Federal Law “On general principles of the organization of local government in the Russian Federation” regarding the redistribution of powers between local authorities and state authorities of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation; an attempt was made to formulate typical problems as a result of law enforcement in the specified area.
28
Khimchenko, Andrey N., and Anastasiia M. Plaksina. "The corporate component of the public sector of the Russian economy: structure, assessment parameters, characteristics." Vestnik of North-Ossetian State University, no. 3(2021) (September 25, 2021): 181–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.29025/1994-7720-2021-3-181-191.
Full textAbstract:
The article systematizes the organizational and legal forms of legal entities of financial and non-financial corporations under the control of the state in the Russian Federation, which made it possible to outline the boundaries of the corporate component of the public sector of the economy. A system of indicators for quantitative measurement of this segment of the national economy is proposed. The most important indicators of the financial and economic activities of federal joint-stock companies (JSC) and federal state unitary enterprises (FSUE) are highlighted, data on which are presented on the website of the Federal State Statistics Service. The analysis of the dynamics of the number of federal JSCs and FSUEs in 2016-2020 was carried out, as a result of which a tendency towards a decrease in their number in Russia was revealed. An assessment of the share of profitable federal joint-stock companies and federal state unitary enterprises for each type of activity is given in comparison with this indicator on average in Russia. The dynamics of the profit received by federal JSCs and FSUEs and the share in the total volume of profits in the Russian Federation in 2018-2019 were also investigated. It was revealed that in Russia the municipal level in most information sources on the functioning of the state sector of the economy is not covered by statistical observation. It is noted that the work of the Analytical Center under the Government of the Russian Federation helps to compose the idea of the activities of unitary enterprises at all three levels of government. At the same time, the available information base makes it possible to characterize the activities of only joint-stock companies of the federal level. In this regard, for a more complete characterization of the scale of the corporate component of the public sector of the economy, it is proposed to analyze the share of the largest companies with state participation (KSU) in the country’s aggregate economic indicators, information about which is provided by various rating agencies. It has been proved that in terms of capitalization of KSUs and the number of employed in them, Russia is ahead of many developed countries. This allows us to conclude that the Russian public sector is being built on the basis of a “corporate model”.
29
Анучин, Петр, Petr Anuchin, Наталья Юдина, Natal'ya Yudina, Евгений Чернышев, and Evgeniy Chernyshev. "Medical tourism export strategy in terms of National project "Healt care" development." Vestnik Roszdravnadzora 2019, no. 4 (August 22, 2019): 81–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.35576/article_5d651dbc895512.43399088.
Full textAbstract:
The article describes strategies that the Government develops for inbound medical tourism initiatives in terms of National project “Health care”. As a global medical tourism market player the Russian Federation has promising opportunities. To estimate the potential of Russia both block and drivers of development were detected. The role of the quality management system was detected in terms of the federal project development. The need for a comparative assessment of the market development potential of the inbound medical tourism in the regions of the Russian Federation is presented.
30
Kostyukov, A. "Quarter-century anniversary of the Russian Constitution." Law Enforcement Review 2, no. 3 (December 25, 2018): 5–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(3).5-18.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of the paper is the constitutional development of Russia till 1990s up to 2018.The purpose of the paper is to identify the main trends in development of Russian consti-tutional legislation.The methodology of the research includes the formal legal analysis of Russian federal laws and their comparison with the decisions of Russian Constitutional Court.The main results and scope of their application. The author gives the legal assessment to main novelties in Russian constitutional legislation: an increase of the term of office of the President of the Russian Federation and the State Duma of the Russian Federation, the in-troduction of the annual reports by the Government of the Russian Federation to the State Duma of the Russian Federation on the results of their activities, the merger of the Supreme and Supreme Arbitration Courts of the Russian Federation, the strengthening of the posi-tions of the President of the Russian Federation when appointing prosecutors, judges, members of the Federation Council, officials of subjects of the Russian Federation, central-ization of local self-government. The identified trends may be used in future research of Russian constitutional legal order.The author comes to the conclusion that there is a need for strong state power in the con-ditions of reforming economic, social and state-legal institutions in Russia. The movement towards centralization and strengthening of the power vertical is a historically necessary and justified measure. It will be possible to implement decentralization and reduction of the regulatory functions of the state after the successful modernization of economic and social state and legal institutions.
31
Kulinich, Aleksandr I., and Evgeniy I. Sorogin. "Monitoring Law Enforcement in Archival Legislation for Legal Loop-Holes: A Case-Study of the Activities of the Archival Agency of the Kurgan Region." Herald of an archivist, no. 1 (2018): 146–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2018-1-146-154.
Full textAbstract:
The authors study legal loop-holes in the archival legislation. As it is impossible to analyze the whole of archival legislation, including regional laws and regulations of all subjects of Russia, the article focuses on the Federal law. It draws on practices of the Archival Agency of the Kurgan Region and addresses practical concerns. It analyzes inconsistencies and legal loop-holes in implementation of following three laws: the Federal law of October 22, 2004 no. 125-FZ ‘On archiving in the Russian Federation,’ the Federal law of 26 December, 2008 no. 294-FZ ‘On protection of rights of legal persons and self-employed entrepreneurs in the exercise of state control (supervision) and municipal control,’ and the Federal law of April 5, 2013 no. 44-FZ ‘On contract systems in the sphere of procurement of goods, works and services for provisioning governmental and municipal needs.’ The study has identified the following legal loop-holes and inconsistencies: (1) There is a legal loop-hole in implementation of the control function. No clear demarcation of jurisdictions of the Russian Federation and those of the subjects of the Russian Federation is provided in Federal laws no. 294-FZ and no. 125-FZ; (2) There is a contradiction between Federal laws no. 125-FZ and no. 44-FZ. In case of winding-up of a state procurement agency and transferring its powers to a government agency, documents on primary activity are to be filed in a state archive and also to remain in the new government agency; (3) Lack of uniform and federally approved methodology for division of ownership of archival documents between municipalities and subjects of the Russian Federation result in similar documents falling under different forms of ownership in different regions; (4) Lack of regulatory framework in acquisition and transfer of e-documents to state archives hinders introduction of a full-featured e-document interchange between state authorities. The authors contend that these legal loop-holes and inconsistencies should be corrected.
32
Remington, Thomas F. "After the Deluge: Regional Crises and Political Consolidation in Russia. By Daniel S. Treisman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999. 262p. $57.50." American Political Science Review 95, no. 1 (March 2001): 247–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401722010.
Full textAbstract:
Daniel Treisman offers an ingenious explanation for the fact that the Russian Federation held together after the collapse of the Soviet regime. Unlike the three other ethnic federa- tions in the communist world-Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, and the USSR itself-the Russian Federation, which was the largest of the 15 nationally based constituent republics in the Soviet Union, avoided disintegration. Many observers in the early 1990s feared the same pressures that had led to powerful separatist movements among the Soviet republics would prove too strong for the fragile central government to resist. Yet, Russia managed to maintain itself as a federal state, albeit weak. The one constituent republic in which separatism ultimately led to armed confrontation was Chech- nia, where a brutal war began in 1994, paused in 1996, and erupted again in 1999.
33
Berger, Y. A. "SYSTEMATIZATION OF TECHNIQUES FOR THE ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENCY OF FUNCTIONING OF OBJECTS OF SOCIAL SPHERE." Scientific bulletin of the Southern Institute of Management, no. 4 (December 30, 2016): 4–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.31775/2305-3100-2016-4-4-7.
Full textAbstract:
This article is a generalization and systematization of the techniques developed by the Ministries and the Government of the Russian Federation, to assess the effectiveness, financial security and volume of educational services in Russia. Analyzes the effectiveness, practical relevance of the introduced techniques by experts in this field. There are three level of normative financing: Federal, regional and municipal. Summarizes the stages of assessment of efficiency of activity of Executive authorities of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Reflected the positive and negative aspects of the embedded assessment techniques identified, their relevance for the education system.
34
Odintsova, A. Vl. "Reforming the Institutional Space for The Development of Municipalities." Federalism 27, no. 2 (July 6, 2022): 82–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2022-2-82-97.
Full textAbstract:
Local self-government is the most important component in the system of federative relations. The general indicators of the country’s socio-economic development largely depend on the chosen model of local self-government, the mechanisms of relations between municipalities, both with regional and federal public authorities. The recent changes in the Russian Federation at the level of constitutional and legal regulation have changed the institutional field of municipal development. These changes were followed by the development of two important bills: the Draft Federal Law «On Urban Agglomerations» prepared by the Ministry of Economic Development, and the Draft Federal Law «On the General Principles of Organizing Local Self-Government in a Unified System of Public Power», the analysis of which is the focus of the article. Based on the study of world experience, it is concluded that the transformations of the institutional space of local self-government and municipal development taking place in Russia, in general, correspond to global trends in spatial development. Particular attention is paid to urban agglomerations as, on the one hand, a modern form of spatial organization; and, on the other hand, a form of inter-municipal cooperation.
35
Yakovlev, V. "Legal Foundations of Russia’ Military Security." World Economy and International Relations, no. 3 (2015): 56–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-3-56-63.
Full textAbstract:
The military security of the Russian Federation in the face of external and internal threats is still primarily important. In this context the rightful principles of defense and security in Russia play a discrete role. The article provides the analysis of these principles for a legal framework of the Russian military security regulation. It reveals system problems, gaps and contradictions of the legal regulation. Complex and urgent measures for the legal system and legal instruments improvement are suggested in the article. It is proposed to develop a number of regulatory acts needed by reason of the blanket character of the Federal Defense Act. Among these are: The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Act, The Operational Equipment of the Territory of the Russian Federation for the Purpose of Defense Act, The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Management and Control during the War Act, etc. Problems of the social relations legal regulation in the defense and security sphere are systemic and complex, require a constant attention on the part of government agencies and a painstaking daily work of legislators. It should facilitate bringing the defense and military security system of the Russian Federation to a fundamentally different, whole new level relevant to the present level of external and internal threats.
36
Acta Naturae. "Made in Russia." Acta Naturae 4, no. 4 (December 15, 2012): 11–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.32607/20758251-2012-4-4-11-16.
Full textAbstract:
By the end of 2012, the Government of the Russian Federation is to approve the State Program Development of the Pharmaceutical and Medical Industries for 20132020, which includes the current Federal Target-Oriented Program Pharma-2020. One of the objectives within the State Program prepared by the Ministry of Industry and Trade is to increase the share of domestically produced drugs and medicinal products in overall consumption by the public healthcare services of the Russian Federation by 48%. However, the term domestically produced drug still remains to be legislatively defined. According to the draft resolution issued by the Ministry of Industry and Trade in May 2012, a domestic drug should mean a drug whose production cycle in the territory of the Russian Federation starts from a substance or a ready-toconsume formulation. Until 2014, the Ministry was ready to regard even those drugs whose packaging was made in Russia as Russian ones. However, no further steps followed. Therefore, the question pertaining to which drugs and which produced by which pharmaceutical companies should be regarded as domestic drugs remains open. Actors of the Russian pharmaceutical industry share their opinions.
37
DREMOVA, Katerina. "Conciliatory Justice in Modern Russia." Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 11, no. 1 (March 31, 2020): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v11.1(47).03.
Full textAbstract:
The research studies conciliatory justice in modern Russia. Its formation and peculiarities in the institution of alternative ways of resolving legal conflict on the example of mediation are considered. Various views regarding the mediation definition are analyzed, and the author's vision of this category concept is given. The origins of mediation history abroad and in Russia are studied. The essence and peculiarities of mediation application as an alternative method of economic disputes settlement are characterized. The benefits of using conciliatory procedures in a business environment are revealed. The main aspects of the procedural legislation reform initiated by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation concerning the change in the legal regulation of conciliatory procedures application in the settlement of legal conflicts are outlined. It is noted that the beginning of procedural reform in Russia with regard to dispute settlement through conciliatory procedures was triggered by the resolution of the plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation ‘On submission to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of Russian Federation a federal law draft ‘On amendments to a number of legislative acts of the Russian Federation in connection with conciliatory procedure improvements’ adopted on 18 January 2018 and the resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation. Statistics on the ratio of dismissals agreed, dispute settlement through the mediation procedure, as well as plaintiff-triggered dismissals are provided. Methodology: the study is carried out on the basis of the universal method on scientific study of the social development principles –dialectical materialism provisions, as well as general and specific scientific methods: dogmatic, regulatory legal, legal comparative, fragmented historical and legal, case studies (statistical data and judicial statistics analysis), logical (hypotheses, analogy, modeling, analysis and synthesis methods), philosophic (axiological, derivation methods on the basis of priori and axiomatic provisions), generalization and abstraction methods. Conclusions: To date, entrepreneurs are increasingly using conciliatory procedures when settling disputes. This way of dispute settlement becomes very convenient, businessmen are not in the need to spend their time on litigation, often protracted, but can settle issues more quickly and effectively. Today, conciliatory justice in the Russian Federation is going through the stage of formation and development and in the future is to become a demanded institution of judicial law.
38
Makarova, Marina Vladimirovna. "Investments in Russian online education (2016-2018)." Теоретическая и прикладная экономика, no. 3 (March 2020): 142–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-8647.2020.3.30458.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of this research is investments in development of online education in Russia. The object of this research is online education in the current conditions of digital economy. The author analyzes the dynamics of investments in capital assets and federal expenditure over the period from 2016 to 2018. The growing role of online education on the Russian education market is indicated. Analysis is conducted on the increased costs of education development. The conclusions are formulated on need for attracting private investments in online educational projects, as well as active development of public-private partnership. It is underlined that although federal expenditure (investments) on education is increasing, it is clearly insufficient and requires attraction of private investments through development of public-private partnership. The following conclusions were made: 1) the government develops mechanisms of public-private partnerships; 2. Only regional investment funds remain in Russia; the Investment Fund of the Russian Federation no longer exists, since its creation on the federal level was not justifiable; 3. Russian education increases its rating on the international level, which influence the development of higher education in the Russian Federation along with export of education; 4. Internet usage among Russian population is uneven. The scientific novelty consists in the attempt to determine the trends in export of Russian education.
39
Dzidzoev, Ruslan Mukharbekovich. "The questions of organization of state power in new revision of the Constitution of the Russian Federation." Право и политика, no. 9 (September 2020): 156–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2020.9.33640.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of this research is the organization of state power in Russia in light of the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation introduced in 2020 that require systematic scientific assessment. The object of this research is the legal acts that laid groundwork for the constitutional reform in Russia: Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of January 15, 2020, Law on Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Opinion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on correspondence of the amendment to the current Constitution of Russia. The author examines the content of the constitutional amendments, their reference with legal logic and requirements for the constitutional progress in Russia. The following conclusions were formulated: the significance and magnitude of the recent constitutional amendments allows speaking of the large-scale constitutional reform that adumbrates the new stage of constitutional evolution in Russia that results in the reform of state superstructure; constitutional amendments noticeably changes the configuration of state power with regards to ratio of the branches of power, checks and balances, objects and redistribution of the institutions of state power, which testifies to transition of the Russian Federation from semi-presidential (presidential-parliamentary) form of government towards presidential, characterized by dominant role of the President within the state system. The novelty of this research lies in analysis of the new constitutional provisions that describe the content of the Russian constitutional reform in the aspect of characteristics of the leading institutions of state power.
40
Ershov, V. V., and E. A. Ershova. "Federal Legal Acts Containing Principles and Norms of Labour Law." Rossijskoe pravosudie 1 (December 25, 2020): 5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2021.5-15.
Full textAbstract:
The article researches theoretical and practical problems of federal legal acts containing principles and norms of labour law: Constitution of the Russian Federation, federal constitutional laws, federal laws, legal decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, legal decrees of the Government of the Russian Federation and legal acts of other federal bodies of state power.
41
Kurapov, D. A., A. A. Konusova, and E. A. Khalimon. "ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF MEASURES TAKEN AT THE FEDERAL AND REGIONAL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT FOR THE EXIT OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY FROM THE PANDEMIC." Vestnik Universiteta, no. 2 (April 3, 2021): 109–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-2-109-116.
Full textAbstract:
The COVID-19 epidemic has become a serious challenge for the economies of all countries of the world. The consequences of the fight against the spread of the virus have led to serious complications in the Russian economy. This article analyses the measures taken by the federal and regional governments aimed at curbing the spread of the pandemic, as well as supporting the economy of Russia and its subjects. The paper presents foreign experience on the measures taken and a comparative analysis between the countries. In addition, the authors study the influence of government decisions and their effectiveness on the basis of scientific articles, estimates and statistics published in the mass media, forecasts of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, reports of the Federal State Statistic Service.
42
Vlassov, Vasiliy V., Katie Bates, and Martin McKee. "Quality improvement in hospitals in the Russian Federation, 2000–2016: a systematic review." Health Economics, Policy and Law 15, no. 3 (October 4, 2019): 403–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1744133119000252.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractWe reviewed published evidence on quality improvement in hospitals in the Russian Federation since 2000. We used three data sources: MEDLINE, ‘Rossiiskaia Meditsina’ (Central Scientific Medical Library), and elibrary.ru using specific search terms. No language or study design restrictions were imposed. In total, 1717 articles were identified; 51 met the inclusion criteria and were thematically analysed. Russian legislation, government acts and grey literature were sourced to contextualise identified themes. Since 2010, the Federal Ministry of Health has increasingly sought to improve quality of care, providing additional resources and new initiatives across the health system. These include clinical practice guidelines, pay for performance schemes, electronic medical records, more specialist care, paraclinical care, and quality control systems. Quality of care, increasingly a concern of the Russian government, is said to be improving. Yet most initiatives have rarely been evaluated. This reflects the limited capacity for health services research in Russia. It seems likely that the full potential for improvements in quality of care in Russia is still to be realised.
43
BUBNOVA, M. E. "AUTOMATED SYSTEM OF TAX AUTHORITIES AS AN EXAMPLE OF A SYSTEM FOR ORGANIZING CONTROL ACTIVITIES BASED ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES OF GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES." EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE: PROBLEMY, RESHENIYA 2, no. 4 (2021): 37–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.04.02.006.
Full textAbstract:
The modern development of automated information systems has given a huge impetus to the organization of control and management activities of the authorities of the Russian Federation. The most stable today is the IT system of the Federal Tax Service of Russia. There is an opportunity to analyze the work of the automated system of the authorities. This will allow us to further implement the strategy for the development of the digital society in Russia, reduce the risks and costs of systems that allow the authorities to carry out their duties.
44
Alferov, Nikita Yu, and Andrey A. Makarov. "The Improvement of Human Resource Management in the Penal System (on the Example of the Federal Government Institution Penal Inspectorate of the Directorate for Moscow of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia)." Criminal-Executory System: law, economics, management 6 (October 29, 2020): 28–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/2072-4438-2020-6-28-32.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes the problems of improving the personnel management system in the criminal еxecutive system of the Russian Federation. The main methods of personnel management are presented, as well as recommendations for improving and developing employee motivation on the example of the fku UII of the Federal penitentiary service of Russia in Moscow.
45
Marić, Bojan. "Mutual relations between Germany and Russia from 2000 to 2017." Megatrend revija 17, no. 1 (2020): 63–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/megrev2001063m.
Full textAbstract:
The focus of this paper is based on the analysis of bilateral relations between Federal Republic Germany and the Russian Federation in the period from 2000 to 2017. Until November 2005, the German Government was led by Social Democratic party leader Gerhard Schroeder. After the triumph, the Christian Democrats at extraordinary parliamentary elections that were held in September the same year the rudder of the government is in hands of Angela Merkel until the present. Vladimir Putin largely determines main directions of Russian politics and represents a dominant political figure since the beginning of his first mandate as the Russian Federation President. These three political leaders have mostly dictated bilateral relations dynamics between FR Germany, as an economic leader in Europe, and the Russian Federation as the biggest country in the world. Germany settles its needs for energy and vital resources mostly from Russia, while the great importance is paid to the import of the German technologies and capital by the Russian side in order to diversify its economy and ceased to be an economy based on the export of the national resources. Unlike most of the growing economies, Germany's relations with the Russian Federation overcomes the capacity of the economy and relates to political and security aspects. The peak of the German-Russian relations had been achieved in 2008 by the project Partnership in modernization. The European Union attempted in 2010 to establish a similar partnership with Russia following the same model. The Ukrainian conflict eruption in 2014 and introduction of sanction to Russian Federation by EU, as well as counter-measures undertaken in opposite direction, has frozen, at least until the moment of the Ukrainian conflict settlement, the possibility for further development of German-Russian relations and partnership agenda between EU and RF.
46
Stepanov, M. M. "Local Self-Government in the Context of the 2020 Constitutional Reform." Actual Problems of Russian Law 16, no. 5 (June 9, 2021): 35–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.126.5.035-041.
Full textAbstract:
Local self-government in modern Russia was revived in the early 1990s. The legislation then in force was aimed at separating local self-government from the system of state authorities and ensuring its autonomy. The independence of local self-government was also established by the 1993 Constitution of Russia. As a follow-up to the provisions of the Constitution, the Federal Law dated 06 Oct 2003 No. 131-FZ “On General Principles of the Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation” was adopted. The Federal Law initiated the reform of local self-government aimed at improving the efficiency of local self-government bodies as an independent level of the public power most closely associated with the population. However, the municipal power is now radically different from that created in those years. This is primarily preconditioned by the lack of the necessary amount of its own revenue necessary to enable the municipal power to exercise its authority independently. The majority of municipalities need state assistance and interbudgetary transfers. The necessity to exercise control over the state budget spendings has led to the fact that the main trend in the development of local self-government in Russia was its integration into the vertical of public power. The legal crystallization of this process was carried out by amending the current legislation, especially the Federal Law No. 131-FZ dated 06 Oct 2003. The Constitutional Reform of 2020 has legitimized these changes.
47
Корякин, И. И. "STATUS OF PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BODY." Теория государства и права, no. 4(25) (January 18, 2022): 156–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.47905/matgip.2021.25.4.013.
Full textAbstract:
В статье рассматривается правовой статус прокуратуры Российской Федерации, как государственного органа. Характеризуются понятие и признаки, принципы и механизмы ее формирования, основное статусное положение и полномочия, правовое регулирование деятельности прокуратуры Российской Федерации. The paper explores the legal status of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation as a government body. The concept and features, principles and mechanisms for its formation, the main status provision and authority, legal regulation of the activities of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation are described and characterized. The paper explores the legal status of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation as a government body. The concept and features, principles and mechanisms for its formation, the main status provision and authority, legal regulation of the activities of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation are described and characterized
48
Рыбакова and Svetlana Rybakova. "Features of formation of regional parliaments in the subjects of the Russian Federation." Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences 11, no. 3 (June 26, 2016): 69–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/20387.
Full textAbstract:
The process of formation of representative bodies in the regions of the Russian Federation, provided by the Russian legislation, is considered. The analysis of the influence of the federal authorities on the formation of regional parliaments is presented.
The restrictions of the real possibilities of regional parliaments to influence the political process in the space of their regions are analyzed, as well as their great dependence on the executive branch. The practices of regional parliaments of the Russian Federation are studied. The change in the structure of regional government legislation, including regional parliaments, based on the author´s analysis of changes, amendments to the Federal Law «On general principles of organization of legislative (representative) and executive bodies of state power of the subjects of the Russian Federation» is examined.
It is proved that the regional parliaments have greater possibilities to structure and intensify the political space of the subjects of the Russian Federation, in the organization of social life, increasing the responsibility of the entire system of public administration. Some recommendations for improving the formation of regional parliaments in Russia are given.
49
Libman, Alexander, and Lars P. Feld. "Strategic Tax Collection and Fiscal Decentralization: The Case of Russia." German Economic Review 14, no. 4 (December 1, 2013): 449–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geer.12004.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In a centralized federation, in which tax rates and taxation rules are set by the federal government, manipulating the thoroughness of tax auditing and the effectiveness of tax collection could be attractive for regional authorities. In this article, we test for strategic tax collection empirically using data of the Russian Federation. Russia’s regional authorities in the 1990s have always been suspected of tax auditing manipulations in their favour. However, in the 2000s, increasing bargaining power of the centre seems to induce tax collection bodies in the regions to manipulate tax auditing in favour of the federal centre. Our findings confirm the existence of strategic tax collection for the Yeltsin period; the results for the Putin period are however ambiguous.
50
Isaeva, Kristina Vadimovna, Yatsek Zalesny, and Vitalii Viktorovich Goncharov. "Establishment and development of the institution of municipal land ownership." NB: Административное право и практика администрирования, no. 4 (April 2020): 54–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2306-9945.2020.4.33823.
Full textAbstract:
This article is dedicated to analysis of the processes of establishment and development of the institution of municipal land ownership. Analysis is conducted on the mechanisms of mediation of municipal land ownership as the legal institution of the unified system of distributed over time historical-legal, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical factors of its emergence and evolution, which being interrelated and interdependent formed the fundamental requirements to legal regulation of this legal institutions, as well as determines the vector of its development. The authors believe that establishment and development of the institution of municipal land ownership in the Russian Federation has passed several historic stages, mediated by the unified system of distributed over time historical-legal, socioeconomic and sociopolitical conditions of the emergence and development of the institution of municipal land ownership in Russia. In the authors’ opinion, further development of municipal ownership law in the Russian Federation requires comprehensive modernization and improvements of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, current legislation, including numerous decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, Government of the Russian Federation, as well as other federal and regional government branches, local self-governance, case law of the Constitutional and Supreme Courts of the Russian Federation.