Academic literature on the topic 'Eyewitness identification'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Eyewitness identification.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Eyewitness identification"

1

Lebensfeld, Taylor, and Laura Smalarz. "Cross-Examination Fails to Safeguard Against Feedback Effects on Eyewitness Testimony." Wrongful Conviction Law Review 3, no. 3 (February 28, 2023): 240–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/wclawr80.

Full text
Abstract:
The legal system relies heavily on eyewitness evidence to identify and prosecute criminal perpetrators, but wrongful convictions resulting from eyewitness misidentification have led many to conclude that eyewitness memory is unreliable. Advances in eyewitness identification research have produced a more nuanced understanding of eyewitness reliability, however. Whereas pristinely collected eyewitness identification evidence provides diagnostic information about a suspect’s guilt or innocence, numerous contaminants of eyewitness memory can undermine the reliability of eyewitness identification evidence. One such contaminant is confirming post-identification feedback—feedback given to or inferred by an eyewitness that communicates that their identification decision was correct. Confirming feedback is inevitable in real cases involving eyewitness identification and compromises the diagnostic value of eyewitness memory to such an extent that it undermines evaluators’ abilities to differentiate between accurate and mistaken eyewitnesses (Smalarz & Wells, 2014). The current research tested whether cross-examination, a fundamental legal safeguard for preventing wrongful conviction based on eyewitness misidentification, can help remedy the contaminating effects of feedback on eyewitness testimony. Evaluators (N = 128) viewed direct examination testimony or direct- and cross-examination testimony of accurate and mistaken eyewitnesses, some of whom had received confirming feedback following their identification. Although the majority of eyewitnesses admitted during cross-examination that some or all of their recollections may have been influenced by the feedback, viewing the cross-examination did not improve evaluators’ abilities to differentiate between accurate and mistaken eyewitness testimony. Cross-examination appears to be an insufficient safeguard for preventing wrongful convictions based on contaminated eyewitness evidence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Wixted, John T., Gary L. Wells, Elizabeth F. Loftus, and Brandon L. Garrett. "Test a Witness’s Memory of a Suspect Only Once." Psychological Science in the Public Interest 22, no. 1_suppl (November 3, 2021): 1S—18S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15291006211026259.

Full text
Abstract:
Eyewitness misidentifications are almost always made with high confidence in the courtroom. The courtroom is where eyewitnesses make their last identification of defendants suspected of (and charged with) committing a crime. But what did those same eyewitnesses do on the first identification test, conducted early in a police investigation? Despite testifying with high confidence in court, many eyewitnesses also testified that they had initially identified the suspect with low confidence or failed to identify the suspect at all. Presenting a lineup leaves the eyewitness with a memory trace of the faces in the lineup, including that of the suspect. As a result, the memory signal generated by the face of that suspect will be stronger on a later test involving the same witness, even if the suspect is innocent. In that sense, testing memory contaminates memory. These considerations underscore the importance of a newly proposed recommendation for conducting eyewitness identifications: Avoid repeated identification procedures with the same witness and suspect. This recommendation applies not only to additional tests conducted by police investigators but also to the final test conducted in the courtroom, in front of the judge and jury.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Albright, Thomas D. "Why eyewitnesses fail." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 30 (July 25, 2017): 7758–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706891114.

Full text
Abstract:
Eyewitness identifications play an important role in the investigation and prosecution of crimes, but it is well known that eyewitnesses make mistakes, often with serious consequences. In light of these concerns, the National Academy of Sciences recently convened a panel of experts to undertake a comprehensive study of current practice and use of eyewitness testimony, with an eye toward understanding why identification errors occur and what can be done to prevent them. The work of this committee led to key findings and recommendations for reform, detailed in a consensus report entitledIdentifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification. In this review, I focus on the scientific issues that emerged from this study, along with brief discussions of how these issues led to specific recommendations for additional research, best practices for law enforcement, and use of eyewitness evidence by the courts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

McGuire, M. Dyan, Tamara Kenny, and Arijana Grabic. "Eyewitness identification for prudent police." Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 38, no. 4 (November 16, 2015): 598–609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-05-2015-0055.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose – Both anecdotal and empirical evidence indicates that even well-intentioned eyewitnesses can make inaccurate identifications resulting in erroneous prosecutions and wrongful convictions. The risk of erroneous identification increases when witnesses are asked to identify people belonging to other races. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the policies which enhance the likelihood of obtaining accurate identifications from eyewitnesses. Legal implications especially relevant to police administrators in the USA including constitutional considerations and risks of civil liability are integrated with the empirical record and used to make policy recommendations likely to decrease legal and public relations entanglements for police. Design/methodology/approach – This paper integrates an empirical literature review with legal research and analysis in order to advocate for prudent policy reforms. Findings – Both the empirical record and current US law indicate that police administrators would be well-advised to require serial, double-blind identification procedures where witnesses are routinely warned about the perpetrator’s potential absence and required to give immediate certainty statements. Officers should be prohibited from using the same suspect with the same witness more than once and should be provided with training on the inherent dangers of inaccuracy associated with cross-racial identifications. Originality/value – While a significant amount of material concerning eyewitness identification exists, most of the existing work does not integrate legal realities, especially those concerning civil liability, within the framework of the eyewitness identification literature. Nor does past work contextualize the need for reform with the emerging racially charged atmosphere in which US police must currently work.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Rodriguez, Dario N., and Melissa A. Berry. "Eyewitness Science and the Call for Double-Blind Lineup Administration." Journal of Criminology 2013 (September 24, 2013): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/530523.

Full text
Abstract:
For several decades, social scientists have investigated variables that can influence the accuracy of eyewitnesses’ identifications. This research has been fruitful and led to many recommendations to improve lineup procedures. Arguably, the most crucial reform social scientists advocate is double-blind lineup administration: lineups should be administered by a person who does not know the identity of the suspect. In this paper, we briefly review the classic research on expectancy effects that underlies this procedural recommendation. Then, we discuss the eyewitness research, illustrating three routes by which lineup administrators’ expectations can bias eyewitness identification evidence: effects on eyewitnesses’ identification decisions, effects on eyewitnesses’ identification confidence, and effects on administrator records of the lineup procedure. Finally, we discuss the extent to which double-blind lineup administration has been adopted among police jurisdictions in the United States and address common concerns about implementing a double-blind standard.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Meintjes, Lirieka. "JUDICIAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE RELIABILITY OF EYEWITNESS EVIDENCE: A TALE OF TWO CASES." Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 19 (July 25, 2016): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1247.

Full text
Abstract:
One of the most significant consequences of the use of post-conviction DNA testing in the criminal justice system has been the growing recognition that eyewitness identification testimony is simply not as reliable as it was previously considered to be. In approximately 75% of DNA exonerations in the United States, mistaken eyewitness identifications were the principal cause of wrongful convictions. Notwithstanding scientific advances regarding human memory and other factors that could influence identifications by eyewitnesses, courts have not shown eagerness in utilising such scientific knowledge in reaching legal decisions. Two cases have been chosen for discussion in this article. In S v Henderson 27 A 3d 872 (NJ 2011) the New Jersey Supreme Court was the first in State and Federal jurisdictions in the US that adopted a science-based approach to the evaluation of eyewitness evidence. The other case under discussion is S v Mdlongwa 2010 2 SACR 419 (SCA),a South African Supreme Court of Appeal judgment, where the identification of the perpetrator was based on an eyewitness account and the evidence of an expert on CCTV images. In part one of this article the research findings with regard to estimator variables that were acknowledged in S v Henderson are discussed. Part two specifically scrutinizes S v Mdlongwa to determine the extent to which psychological eyewitness research findings are recognised in South Africa as having an influence on the reliability of eyewitness evidence. In Henderson the court recognised that the legal standards governing the admissibility and use of identification evidence lagged far behind the findings of numerous studies in the social sciences. The new wave introduced by S v Henderson has not gone unnoticed in other State courts in the USA. In Massachusetts, for example, the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court convened a study group on Eyewitness Evidence and the resulting report inter alia recommended judicial notice of modern psychological principles, revised jury eyewitness identification instructions and continuous education of both judges and lawyers. Recognition and education pertaining to these factors can and should be incorporated in South Africa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wixted, John T., Laura Mickes, John C. Dunn, Steven E. Clark, and William Wells. "Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 2 (December 22, 2015): 304–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516814112.

Full text
Abstract:
Laboratory-based mock crime studies have often been interpreted to mean that (i) eyewitness confidence in an identification made from a lineup is a weak indicator of accuracy and (ii) sequential lineups are diagnostically superior to traditional simultaneous lineups. Largely as a result, juries are increasingly encouraged to disregard eyewitness confidence, and up to 30% of law enforcement agencies in the United States have adopted the sequential procedure. We conducted a field study of actual eyewitnesses who were assigned to simultaneous or sequential photo lineups in the Houston Police Department over a 1-y period. Identifications were made using a three-point confidence scale, and a signal detection model was used to analyze and interpret the results. Our findings suggest that (i) confidence in an eyewitness identification from a fair lineup is a highly reliable indicator of accuracy and (ii) if there is any difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two lineup formats, it likely favors the simultaneous procedure.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Brewer, Neil, and Gary L. Wells. "Eyewitness Identification." Current Directions in Psychological Science 20, no. 1 (February 2011): 24–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721410389169.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Wells, Gary L. "Eyewitness Identification." Current Directions in Psychological Science 23, no. 1 (February 2014): 11–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721413504781.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Budyakova, Tatyana P. "Memory Errors in Eyewitness Identification Testimony." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24, no. 3 (March 30, 2020): 2931–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i3/pr2020326.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Eyewitness identification"

1

Hobson, Zoe J. "Eyewitness identification of multiple perpetrators." Thesis, London South Bank University, 2013. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.593649.

Full text
Abstract:
Eyewitness identification is crucial in the apprehension and prosecution of criminals and it is thought to be one of the major determining factors in jury decision making. Making accurate identifications is therefore imperative, yet research has demonstrated that a number of variables can influence an eyewitness’ identification performance. One such factor is the number of perpetrators seen in the crime event. Recently, both within England and Wales and around the world, there has been a dramatic increase in crimes which involve multiple perpetrators. In contrast, only a few isolated studies have examined eyewitness performance of identifying multiple perpetrators of one crime, all of which have suggested that accuracy is poor, but few studies have made direct comparisons to single perpetrator identifications. This research aimed to explore multiple perpetrator identification performance, and extend previous literature to examine theoretical explanations behind eyewitnesses’ performance. The first study explored the extent of multiple perpetrator identifications within England and Wales and reports the results from a survey distributed to all police identification units within each force. Four further experimental studies were then conducted. Study 2 used an eyewitness paradigm to systematically explore the effects of single and multiple perpetrators at both the encoding (crime event) and retrieval (identification) stage, with results indicating that there was a multiple perpetrator disadvantage, highlighting that multiple perpetrators cause the greatest interference at the encoding stage of the process. Study 3 considered divided attention as a theoretical explanation for the poor identification performance of multiple perpetrators by integrating a change blindness paradigm and eyewitness paradigm, again comparing between single and multiple perpetrator crimes. As those who viewed a multiple perpetrator event were less likely to notice the change in perpetrator, and identification performance was poor, Study 4 questioned whether cueing a witness using intentional instructions could focus their attention to one particular perpetrator and subsequently improve identification performance, with positive results. Since the previous experiments had found an effect of divided attention, Study 5 examined whether the similarity of the perpetrators also caused interference at encoding, with results suggesting that they do. As multiple perpetrators in one crime event appear to cause interference in the perceptual process at the encoding, or crime, stage, future research needs to identify further methods of aiding witnesses to accurately encode the information and subsequently retrieve it, whether this is through elaborate instructions, or identification procedures.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Pryke, Sean Patrick. "Multiple independent identification decisions, a method of calibrating eyewitness identifications." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2001. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp05/NQ63445.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Houston, Kate Alexandra. "The emotional eyewitness : an investigation into the effects of anger on eyewitness recall and recognition performance." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2010. http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=165532.

Full text
Abstract:
The present thesis examined the effects of anger on the completeness and accuracy of eyewitness free and cued recall and recognition performance. Anger was revealed by a recent survey as the emotion experienced by the majority of eyewitnesses to crime, so is particularly important in this context. Previous literature has tended to use generic concepts such as ‘emotion’ or ‘stress’ to investigate emotion effects, but this thesis sought to examine the effect of the specific emotion of anger on memory. Experiment 1 tested theoretical predictions regarding the effects of anger on encoding and retrieval processes. In line with these predictions, angry participants provide more complete descriptions of a perpetrator compared to neutral participants. However, angry participants provide less complete descriptions of the perpetrator’s actions than their neutral counterparts. This pattern of results was replicated throughout all experiments in this thesis. Experiment 2 revealed that anger has no effect on the completeness and accuracy of victim descriptions. Experiment 3 found that the pattern of anger effects observed for a younger adult sample were also found when older adults were tested. This prompted a statistical comparison of younger and older adults which found very few age effects and no interactions between age of the participant, experience of anger and the category of detail recalled. The final experiment thoroughly investigated the effects of anger on participants’ ability to recognise the perpetrator from a photographic lineup. The main findings of this thesis suggest that while angry eyewitnesses may be able to provide a more complete description of the perpetrator, they may be less able to describe what he did, and less able to accurately recognise him from a lineup than neutral eyewitnesses. These findings are discussed in terms of cognitive and meta-cognitive models of encoding and retrieval.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Van, Norman David. "Eyewitness suggestibility across presentation modalities." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 1992. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/454.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dupuis, Paul R. "Calibrating eyewitness identification accuracy using rank-combined lineups." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2001. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp05/MQ63296.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Dysart, Jennifer E. "The effects of delay on eyewitness identification accuracy." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape10/PQDD_0003/MQ42609.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Chung, Cheuk-fai Bell, and 鍾灼輝. "Lineup superiority effects in cross-racial eyewitness identification." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2010. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B45147607.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ellis, Heather. "Unconscious transference : an investigation of eyewitness identification errors." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.248645.

Full text
Abstract:
The thesis investigates the unconscious transference phenomenon which has been implicated in cases of mistaken identity. When an eyewitness to a crime misidentifies an innocent, but previously encountered person as the perpetrator in response to a lineup which does not include culprit, it has been speculated that the eyewitness confuses the two people by transferring their identities across contexts. This traditional definition of unconscious transference was investigated in one of two experiments. A videotaped, staged theft scenario was shown to 770 participant witnesses who attempted to identify the perpetrator from a photographic lineup. Those who viewed an innocent bystander prior to the crime scenario, were more likely to mistake that familiar person for the perpetrator when the latter was absent from the lineup, compared to control participants who were not shown the bystander. Bystander misidentifications obtained indicate that transference did occur. A significant minority of participants consciously inferred that the bystander and the perpetrator were the same person seen in different settings. Others realised that the two confederates were different individuals but misattributed the source of their memories. In a second experiment, evidence of another type of unconscious transference, characterised as a commitment effect, was obtained. Three months after the initial lineup, a second lineup administered to 505 participants from the first investigation indicated that an innocent person initially misidentified is likely to continue to be misidentified even if he/she was unfamiliar to the eyewitness prior to his photograph being shown. Further, a repeat misidentification is likely even when the perpetrator is included in the subsequent lineup. Cognitive mechanisms implicated in the transference effects include some monitoring and memory blending. However, relative judgements, demand characteristics and changes of presentation media were also implicated. The ramifications for forensic eyewitness situations are such that unconscious transference demands increased attention from eyewitness researchers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Colloff, Melissa F. "Eyewitness identification performance on lineups for distinctive suspects." Thesis, University of Warwick, 2016. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/90153/.

Full text
Abstract:
When constructing lineups for suspects with distinctive facial features (e.g., scars, tattoos, piercings), current police guidelines in several countries state that the distinctive suspect must not stand out. To this end, police officers sometimes artificially replicate a suspect’s distinctive feature across the other lineup members (replication); other times, they conceal the feature on the suspect and conceal a similar area on the other members by pixelating the area (pixelation), or covering the area with a solid rectangle (block). Although these three techniques are used frequently, little research has examined their efficacy. This thesis investigates how the lineup techniques for distinctive suspects influence eyewitness identification performance and, in doing so, tests the predictions of a new model of eyewitness decision-making—the diagnostic-feature-detection model (Wixted & Mickes, 2014). The research uses a standard eyewitness identification paradigm and signal detection statistics to examine how replication, pixelation, and block techniques influence identification performance: [1] compared to doing nothing to stop the distinctive suspect from standing out; [2] in young, middle-aged and older adults; and [3] when the culprit does not have the feature during the crime. It also examines [4] how variation in the way the suspect’s feature is replicated influences identification performance. The results converge to suggest that all three lineup techniques currently used by the police to accommodate distinctive suspects are equally effective and, when the culprit has the feature at the time of the crime, all enhance people’s ability to discriminate between innocent and guilty suspects more than doing nothing to prevent a distinctive suspect from standing out. All three lineup techniques enable people of all ages to make highly confident decisions when they are likely to be accurate. These findings align with the predictions of the diagnostic-feature-detection model, which suggests that the model remains a viable theory of eyewitness decision-making.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Flowe, Heather D. "The effect of lineup member similarity on recognition accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups." Diss., Connected to a 24 p. preview or request complete full text in PDF format. Access restricted to UC IP addresses, 2005. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/ucsd/fullcit?p3189995.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2005.
Title from first page of PDF file (viewed March 1, 2006). Available via ProQuest Digital Dissertations. Vita. Includes bibliographical references ( p. 113-116).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Eyewitness identification"

1

Cutler, Brian L. Evaluating eyewitness identification. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Cutler, Brian L. Evaluating eyewitness identification. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Cutler, Brian L. Evaluating eyewitness identification. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

1966-, Kovera Margaret Bull, ed. Evaluating eyewitness identification. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Allen, Bonnie G., Harry L. Miles, and Pamela L. Hunt. Trends in eyewitness identification. [Boston, MA]: MCLE, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Allen, Bonnie G., Radha Natarajan, and William G. Brooks. Trends in eyewitness identification. Boston, MA: MCLE New England, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Allen, Bonnie G., Radha Natarajan, and William G. Brooks. Trends in eyewitness identification. Boston, MA: MCLE New England, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Pegg, Michelle Louise. Eyewitness identification: Evaluating lineup processes. [San Diego, California]: National University, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Michael, Fabbri, Rudof Paul, and Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (1982- ), eds. New procedures in eyewitness identification. Boston, MA (Ten Winter Pl., Boston, 02108-4751): MCLE, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Lewis, Andrea J. The fallibility of eyewitness identifications. [San Diego, California]: National University, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Eyewitness identification"

1

Walker, Lenore E., David Shapiro, and Stephanie Akl. "Eyewitness Identification." In Introduction to Forensic Psychology, 325–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44470-9_22.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Walker, Lenore E. A., and David L. Shapiro. "Eyewitness Identification." In Introduction to Forensic Psychology, 353–67. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3795-0_19.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Howe, Mark L., Lauren M. Knott, and Martin A. Conway. "Eyewitness Identification." In Memory and Miscarriages of Justice, 97–116. New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Psychology Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315752181-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Osterburg, James W., Richard H. Ward, and Larry S. Miller. "Eyewitness Identification." In Criminal Investigation, 159–72. 8 Edition. | New York : Routledge, 2019. | Revised edition of Criminal investigation, [2014]: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429259692-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kovera, Margaret Bull, and Eliana Aronson. "Eyewitness Identification." In Routledge Handbook of Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Practices, 258–64. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003219286-33.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Newirth, Karen A., and Barry C. Scheck. "Eyewitness Identification Evidence." In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1518–29. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_671.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wilford, Miko M., and Gary L. Wells. "Eyewitness system variables." In Reform of eyewitness identification procedures., 23–43. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14094-002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Zimmerman, David M., Jacqueline L. Austin, and Margaret Bull Kovera. "Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures." In Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research., 125–48. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13085-006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sauer, James D., and Neil Brewer. "Confidence and Accuracy of Eyewitness Identification." In Forensic Facial Identification, 185–208. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118469538.ch8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Wright, Daniel B., Amina Memon, Gary Dalton, Rebecca Milne, and Ruth Horry. "Field studies of eyewitness memory." In Reform of eyewitness identification procedures., 179–201. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14094-009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Eyewitness identification"

1

Levi, Avraham, Noam Jungmann, and Arie Aperman. "Similarity judgments serving eyewitness identification." In SPIE's 1995 International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation, edited by Leonid I. Rudin and Simon K. Bramble. SPIE, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.218478.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Mu, Enrique, and Rachel Chung. "A New Approach to Eyewitness Police Identification." In The International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Creative Decisions Foundation, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2013.005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Fjelstad, Per. "Testimony Traces in Appellate Review: Expertise Extension in Cases of Domestic Abuse and Eyewitness Identification." In 2016: Confronting the challenges of public participation in environmental, planning and health decision-making. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-63.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography