Academic literature on the topic 'Extraordinary Chambers'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Extraordinary Chambers.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Extraordinary Chambers"
Tek, Farrah L. "Justice at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia?" Peace Review 23, no. 4 (October 2011): 431–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2011.625738.
Full textLinton, Suzannah. "Safeguarding the Independence and Impartiality of the Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers." Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, no. 2 (May 1, 2006): 327–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql009.
Full textSluiter, Göran. "Due Process and Criminal Procedure in the Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers." Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, no. 2 (May 1, 2006): 314–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql010.
Full textYang, Suhong. "Trial Chamber Case 002/02 Against Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan (Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia)." International Legal Materials 59, no. 1 (February 2020): 159–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2020.6.
Full textScheffer, David J. "Case 004/2 Involving AO An: Considerations on Appeals Against Closing Orders (Extraordinary Chambers Cts. Cambodia)." International Legal Materials 59, no. 4 (August 2020): 563–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2020.37.
Full textBirkett, Daley J. "Victims’ Justice? Reparations and Asset Forfeiture at the Extraordinary African Chambers." Journal of African Law 63, no. 2 (June 2019): 151–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855319000159.
Full textSperfeldt, Christoph. "Collective Reparations at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia." International Criminal Law Review 12, no. 3 (2012): 457–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181212x648888.
Full textMatsiko, Samuel. "Optics, Aged Witnesses and Aged Defendants: Habré at the Extraordinary African Chambers." International Criminal Law Review 22, no. 1-2 (October 15, 2021): 244–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10100.
Full textTyner, James A. "Book review: Transitional Justice and Memory in Cambodia: Beyond the Extraordinary Chambers." Memory Studies 13, no. 4 (June 10, 2020): 767–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1750698020929937.
Full textGauld, Kate. "A Postcard from the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (‘ECCC’)." Alternative Law Journal 41, no. 2 (June 2016): 131–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1037969x1604100215.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Extraordinary Chambers"
KONG, Sam Onn. "Jurisdiction Ratione Personae of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia: Peace vs. Justice." 名古屋大学大学院国際開発研究科, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2237/10587.
Full textKroker, Patrick [Verfasser]. "Zivilparteien in Völkerstrafverfahren. : Eine Analyse der Opferbeteiligung an den ›Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia‹. / Patrick Kroker." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2012. http://d-nb.info/123842855X/34.
Full textSchulz, Sabine. "Transitional Justice und hybride Gerichte : zur strafrechtlichen Verfolgung von völkerstrafrechtlichen Verbrechen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des kambodschanischen Sondergerichts (Extraordinary Chambers) /." Berlin Münster Lit, 2009. http://d-nb.info/996693483/04.
Full textJasini, Rudina. "Victim participation in international criminal justice : the case of the extraordinary chambers in the courts of Cambodia : real power or empty rhetoric?" Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d364ae54-f369-4ead-a21e-a6f9938e6476.
Full textKillean, Rachel Louise. "Victims, professionalisation and international justice : a critical examination of the civil party system in the extraordinary chambers in the courts of Cambodia." Thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2016. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.706996.
Full textMwesigwa, Peter Katonene. "An analysis of the difficulties related to victim participation before the International Criminal Court and the extraordinary chambers in the courts of Cambodia." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2012. http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&action=viewtitle&id=gen8Srv25Nme4_7360_1373278546.
Full textBy any standard, victim participation is a relatively new phenomenon in international criminal law proceedings. Incredible advances have been made in the effort to end impunity for crimes against
umanity, war crimes, genocide and, more recently, aggression. As a result, great strides have been made in ensuring the direct participation of victims of grave violations of human rights
in court proceedings against their perpetrators. Prior to this, grave violations of human rights committed during conflicts or periods of mass violence were either largely ignored or even if action
was taken, victims of the crimes hardly had a &lsquo
say&rsquo
in the proceedings. With the advent of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
new dawn in the proceedings of international criminal law has emerged. The statutes that govern the ICC and ECCC have given a voice to victims in court proceeding buy ensuring
victims participation.Despite these advances, scholars have criticized victim participation for being inconsistent in its application at the International Criminal Court.1 The criticism has come from
scholars who have highlighted the unintended consequences of victim participation in court proceedings, arguing that their participation has resulted in the under- or misrepresentation of the
actual experience of survivors of war, mass violence, or repression. These problems have arisen largely because the need to establish the guilt or innocence of the accused and to protect their
due process rights, to abide by the rules of evidence and procedure, and to conserve judicial resources all cut against victim-witnesses'ability to tell their stories at these tribunals thereby
resulting in a limited, and sometimes inaccurate, record of victims' experience.
Katonene, Peter Mwesigwa. "An analysis of the difficulties related to victim participation before the International Criminal Court and the Extraordinary Chambers in the courts of Cambodia." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/4578.
Full textBy any standard, victim participation is a relatively new phenomenon in international criminal law proceedings. Incredible advances have been made in the effort to end impunity for crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide and, more recently, aggression. As a result, great strides have been made in ensuring the direct participation of victims of grave violations of human rights in court proceedings against their perpetrators. Prior to this, grave violations of human rights committed during conflicts or periods of mass violence were either largely ignored or even if action was taken, victims of the crimes hardly had a ‘say’ in the proceedings. With the advent of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) a new dawn in the proceedings of international criminal law has emerged. The statutes that govern the ICC and ECCC have given a voice to victims in court proceeding buy ensuring victims participation. Despite these advances, scholars have criticized victim participation for being inconsistent in its application at the International Criminal Court. The criticism has come from scholars who have highlighted the unintended consequences of victim participation in court proceedings, arguing that their participation has resulted in the under- or misrepresentation of the actual experience of survivors of war, mass violence, or repression. These problems have arisen largely because the need to establish the guilt or innocence of the accused and to protect their due process rights, to abide by the rules of evidence and procedure, and to conserve judicial resources all cut against victim-witnesses' ability to tell their stories at these tribunals thereby resulting in a limited, and sometimes inaccurate, record of victims' experience. Background: The idea that victims should be allowed to participate in international criminal proceedings stems from a broader movement over the last several decades advocating for restorative, as opposed to merely retributive justice. Proponents of this restorative justice movement maintain that “justice should not only address traditional retributive justice, i.e., punishment of the guilty, but should also provide a measure of restorative justice by, inter alia, allowing victims to participate in the proceedings and by providing compensation to victims for their injuries.” In other words, advocates of this movement believe that criminal justice mechanisms should serve the interests of victims, in addition to punishing wrongdoers, and that the participation of victims in criminal proceedings is an integral part of serving victims' interests. Although the concept of victim participation in criminal proceedings is not easily defined, it has been described as victims “being in control, having a say, being listened to, or being treated with dignity and respect.” Human rights activists supported the concept for several reasons. Many believed, as did victim advocates more generally, that participation in criminal proceedings has a number of potential restorative benefits, including the promotion of victims' “healing and rehabilitation.” Indeed, in its recommendations to the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of the International Criminal Court (Preparatory Committee I), “participation is significant not only to protecting the rights of the victim at various stages of the proceeding, but also to advancing the process of healing from trauma and degradation.” Some believed that victim participation would bring the court “closer to the persons who have suffered atrocities” and thus increase the likelihood that victims would be satisfied that justice was done. set of recommendations on the ICC elements of crimes and rules of procedure and evidence, noted “the right of victims to participate in the proceedings was included in the Rome Statute to ensure that the process is as respectful and transparent as possible so that justice can be seen to be done . . .” Finally, and significantly for the purpose of this study, human rights activists thought that victim participation might help address the under- or misrepresentation of the experiences of victims. Research questions and objectives of the study: The question this research paper poses is whether victim participation has increased the visibility of the actual lived experience of survivors in the context of war, mass violence, or repression? Under the Rome Statute, victims of the world's most serious crimes were given unprecedented rights to participate in proceedings before the court. Nearly a decade later, a similar scheme was established to allow victims to participate as civil parties in the proceedings before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, created with UN support to prosecute atrocities committed by leaders of the Khmer Rouge during the period of 1975 to 1979. Although there are some significant differences in how the schemes work at the ICC and ECCC, both courts allow victims to participate in criminal proceedings independent of their role as witnesses for either the prosecution or defence. In other words, both have victim participation schemes intended to give victims a voice in the proceedings. Have these new participation schemes before the ICC and ECCC, in fact, helped in satisfying the victims? What impact have they had on the ability of survivors of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide to tell their story and to talk about their experiences in their own words? In particular, has victim participation enabled more of them to tell their stories than would have been possible under the more traditional adversarial model employed by the ad hoc tribunals such as the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). Has it allowed them to expand the historical record produced by these tribunals with narratives that would otherwise have been left out because of prosecutorial or judicial decisions not to prosecute violations committed against them? Has it enabled victims to communicate a richer, more nuanced picture of their experiences than they were able to in the context of prior tribunals? The aim is to explore whether these novel victim participation schemes, as implemented by the ICC and ECCC thus far, have actually allowed for greater recognition of victims' voices and experiences than was possible in proceedings before their predecessor tribunals. Have these schemes actually allowed victims to communicate a fuller and more nuanced picture of their experiences than they would have been able to do as victim-witnesses before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)? In other words, can the victim participation schemes at the ICC answer the call for increased visibility of the actual lived experience of survivors of human rights violations in the context of war, mass violence, or repression?.
Sperfeldt, Christoph. "Practices of Reparations in International Criminal Justice." Phd thesis, Canberra, ACT : The Australian National University, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/149070.
Full textMulerwa, Olivia Kaguliro. "The hybrid court model and the legitimacy of international criminal justice in Africa." University of Western Cape, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/3916.
Full textHybrid Courts are the latest innovation in the prosecution of international crimes after the era of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Examples include; the Extraordinary African Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, the Regulation 64 Panels in the courts of Kosovo and the Special Court for Sierra Leone. The hybrid court model at its inception was believed to be the panacea for the short comings of purely international tribunals. The characteristic location of the tribunals in the locus of the atrocities and the participation of local judicial officers alongside their international counterparts was expected to promote legitimacy and foster capacity building for conflict ravaged transitional states. Despite the criticisms of the model today, a new hybrid court has recently been inaugurated to prosecute Hissène Habré the former President of Chad, for international crimes committed during his presidency. The promulgation of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Senegal suggests that the model continues to be useful, especially for Africa. This is of particular significance since international criminal justice has lately come under attack on the continent. The on-going feud between the African Union and the International Criminal court is only the most prolific example of this. This research paper explores the dimensions of the challenges facing the legitimacy of international criminal justice in Africa and the extent to which the hybrid court model can provide a solution for them. In order to do so, the study begins by addressing the meaning of legitimacy within the African context. A general discussion of hybrid tribunals, as well as the specific manifestations of the model in Africa so far, follows. The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Extraordinary African Chambers in the Courts of Senegal are distinguishable from each other in structure and are thus juxtaposed in order to illuminate possible improvements on the hybrid court model for the future.
Mohan, Mahdev. "The paradox of victim-centrism : a case study of the civil party process at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal /." Thesis, Scroll list to author, 2009. http://www.law.stanford.edu/publications/dissertations_theses/.
Full textSubmitted to the Stanford Program in International Legal Studies at the Stanford Law School, Stanford University. "April 2009." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 78-82). Abstract available online.
Books on the topic "Extraordinary Chambers"
Wolf, Willem-Jan van der, and Claudia Tofan. Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Tilburg: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2010.
Find full textExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, ed. Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Tilburg: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2010.
Find full textExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Pre-trial chamber : Khieu Samphan. [Phnom Penh]: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 2009.
Find full textExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Pre-trial chamber : Ieng Thirith. [Phnom Penh]: Extraordinary Chambers in The Courts of Cambodia, 2009.
Find full textExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Pre-trial chamber : Ieng Sary. [Phnom Penh]: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 2009.
Find full textMeisenberg, Simon M., and Ignaz Stegmiller, eds. The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-105-0.
Full textauthor, Heindel Anne, ed. Hybrid justice: The extraordinary chambers in the courts of Cambodia. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2014.
Find full textGidley, Rebecca. Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04783-2.
Full textExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, ed. The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Basic documents on the court. The Hague: ICA (International Courts Association), 2010.
Find full textExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Hybrid perspectives on legacies of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC). Phnom Penh: The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 2012.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Extraordinary Chambers"
Beigbeder, Yves. "The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia." In International Criminal Tribunals, 145–69. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230305052_7.
Full textBeauvallet, Olivier, and Jeanne-Thérèse Schmit. "The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia." In International Conflict and Security Law, 619–32. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-515-7_29.
Full textFall, Mbacké. "The Extraordinary African Chambers: The Case of Hissène Habré." In Africa and the International Criminal Court, 117–31. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-029-9_8.
Full textGidley, Rebecca. "Introduction." In Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 1–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04783-2_1.
Full textGidley, Rebecca. "The State of Transitional Justice." In Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 17–41. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04783-2_2.
Full textGidley, Rebecca. "Confronting the Past, 1975–1996." In Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 43–78. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04783-2_3.
Full textGidley, Rebecca. "The Development and Evolution of the ECCC, 1997–2003." In Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 79–117. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04783-2_4.
Full textGidley, Rebecca. "The ECCC in Action, 2003–2018." In Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 119–55. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04783-2_5.
Full textGidley, Rebecca. "Breaking the Mould: Cambodia and the Transitional Justice Literature." In Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 157–86. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04783-2_6.
Full textGidley, Rebecca. "Distinguishing Cambodia and Explaining the Existence of the ECCC." In Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 187–210. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04783-2_7.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Extraordinary Chambers"
Soky, Kak, Masato Mimura, Tatsuya Kawahara, Sheng Li, Chenchen Ding, Chenhui Chu, and Sethserey Sam. "Khmer Speech Translation Corpus of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)." In 2021 24th Conference of the Oriental COCOSDA International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardisation of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (O-COCOSDA). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/o-cocosda202152914.2021.9660421.
Full text