Academic literature on the topic 'Experts'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Experts.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Experts"
Дунаев, Дмитрий Владимирович, and Леонид Васильевич Кривобоков. "СКЛАДАННЯ ПРОГРАМ КОМПЛЕКСНОГО ЕКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНОГО ВІДПРАЦЮВАННЯ ВИРОБІВ РАКЕТНОЇ ТЕХНІКИ З УРАХУВАННЯМ ГРУПОВОГО РІШЕННЯ КОМІСІЇ ЕКСПЕРТІВ." Aerospace Technic and Technology, no. 6 (August 12, 2017): 103–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2017.6.15.
Full textTotty, R. N. "Towards Expert Experts." Journal of the Forensic Science Society 25, no. 5 (September 1985): 327–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-7368(85)72410-3.
Full textReynoso, Diego. "Autoposicionamiento ideológico y distorsiones idiosincráticas en los estudios basados en juicios de expertos mexicanos." Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública 8, no. 15 (February 27, 2019): 5–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.15174/remap.v8i15.331.
Full textTang, Jin, Chun Dong Guo, and Yan Gao. "Using the Shapley Value to Determine the Expert’s Discourse Right in Group Decision-Making." Applied Mechanics and Materials 713-715 (January 2015): 2029–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.713-715.2029.
Full textNCC Ltd. "Expert system helps experts." Knowledge-Based Systems 1, no. 4 (September 1988): 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(88)90040-8.
Full textHarlsen, Paul. "Expert systems for experts." Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1, no. 3 (January 1989): 148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0933-3657(89)90010-9.
Full textXie, Zhitian, Yinger Zhang, Chenyi Zhuang, Qitao Shi, Zhining Liu, Jinjie Gu, and Guannan Zhang. "MoDE: A Mixture-of-Experts Model with Mutual Distillation among the Experts." Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 38, no. 14 (March 24, 2024): 16067–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i14.29539.
Full textKalancha, I. "PARTICIPATION OF EXPERTS IN JUDICIAL CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL CASES – INNOVATIVE APPROACH." Criminalistics and Forensics, no. 64 (May 7, 2018): 137–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2019.64.10.
Full textLi, Ming. "An Approach to Expert Finding Based on Multi-Granularity Two-Tuple Linguistic Information." Applied Mechanics and Materials 58-60 (June 2011): 1317–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.58-60.1317.
Full textFileva, Iskra. "WHAT DO EXPERTS KNOW?" Social Philosophy and Policy 38, no. 2 (2021): 72–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s026505252200005x.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Experts"
Gross, Olivia. "Experts et expertise : le cas des patients : Contribution à la caractérisation du patient-expert et de son expertise." Thesis, Paris 13, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA131003.
Full textNew information technology provides access to knowledge; thanks to forums and social networks, patients can organize, constructing a community in which some patients are considered experts in their chronic disease. The nature of that expertise is unclear and controversial, however, and demands characterizations. To characterize this phenomenon we employed social constructivism and methodological individualism as a conceptual framework. Using an initial analysis grid taken from a literature review on the concepts of expert and expertise, we interviewed twelve patients socially acknowledged as having expert experience, as well as health professionals with whom they have contact in a variety of circumstances
Capasso, Valentina. "Tractent fabrilia fabri : du juge "expert" au "jugement" des experts ?" Thesis, Lyon, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020LYSE3004.
Full textIn order to face the crisis of the justice system, the legislator has always reacted by modifying the codes, but the economic analysis shows the inadequacy of the procedural reforms. Indeed, the goals mainly pursued by the legislator (reduction of the demand for justice and acceleration of the trial) by changing the rules of the game are often ignored because, among other things, of the strategic behaviour of the actors of the trial.The only area which reveals still unexploited potentialities is that of judge’s specialization; but specialization, both legal and epistemic, encounters strong cultural resistance, probably related to the judge's sociological and legal image, which has been built and consolidated over time. It is the image of a superman, hidden from passions and cognitive prejudices and, above all, omniscient: hence, the idea that iura novit curia and that the judge is peritorum peritum.The research conducted here, however, aims to show the distance between these adages and reality and that the provisions of the law, shaped on the basis of this ideal image, end up being distorted, if not ignored; often at the expense (of at least one) of the parties. For these reasons, it is suggested that the focus of the discipline should be transferred from the trial to the judge; but this shift implies, on the one hand, the need to understand the latter as a man, thus relying on interdisciplinary research; on the other, a revision of the selection procedures of the magistrate's person
Johnson, Nicola F., and nicola johnson@deakin edu au. "Teenage techological experts: Bourdieu and the performance of expertise." Deakin University, 2007. http://tux.lib.deakin.edu.au./adt-VDU/public/adt-VDU20071107.113906.
Full textSvensson, Hanna, and Henrik Pettersson. "The storytelling of new experts : How CSR-experts legitimize through storytelling." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-414641.
Full textRhéaume, Marc. "Enseignantes et enseignants experts en histoire : Comment se développe leur expertise?" Mémoire, Université de Sherbrooke, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11143/9781.
Full textStaderman, William P. "Communicating expertise in system operation and fault diagnosis to non-experts." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/27468.
Full textPh. D.
David, Jean-Marc. "Les systèmes experts de seconde génération : contribution à une ingénierie de la connaissance /." Paris : Ecole nationale supérieure des télécommunications, 1993. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb35691552t.
Full textGoodall, Amanda. "Does it take an expert to lead experts? : professionals versus managers in universities." Thesis, University of Warwick, 2007. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/2849/.
Full textGalloway, Craig James. "The role and use of experts and expert knowledge in spatial conservation prioritization." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/79815.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: Decision-making in conservation should be efficient and effective as time and resources are typically limited. Conservation planning is one process by which stakeholders collaboratively make decisions when attempting to ensure the persistence of biodiversity. Spatial prioritization is the activity of applying quantitative data to spatial analysis to select locations for conservation investment and is a distinct process within conservation planning. The use of experts in spatial prioritization, and more generally in conservation planning, is widely accepted and advocated, but there is no general operational model for how best to involve them. Acceptable standards of practice in selecting experts and in applying specific techniques for eliciting expert knowledge need to be developed and tested in different contexts to ensure robust and defensible results of spatial prioritization processes. Although experts and expert knowledge have limitations, including them in spatial prioritization can produce many benefits, such as increased robustness of decisions and time and cost savings. Timeous, decisive, cost-efficient and robust decision-making is essential when attempting to stem the continued loss of biodiversity across the world. Although widely used, very little research has been conducted into the role of experts in spatial prioritization processes. In this research, the role and use of experts and expert knowledge in spatial prioritization was explored through the following processes: 1) a review of the peer-reviewed literature examining the role, and different types, of experts included in spatial prioritization studies (Chapter 2) to identify the patterns of their involvement; 2) a study examining the process and the differences between individual and group expert outputs and outcomes produced from a typical spatial prioritization workshop to provide a baseline against which experts might be identified for future involvement (Chapter 3); and 3) a study examining the knowledge of local community and land management experts and their ability to predict private landowners self-reported attitudes towards conservation, willingness to partner with organizations and behavior relating to conservation, aimed to test if expert knowledge might replace interviews when mapping conservation opportunity (Chapter 4). The main findings of this research are, firstly, that experts primarily contributed to spatial prioritization through mapping of species, habitats and ecosystems (that can be input into spatial prioritization analyses), and specifically also the selection of areas important for implementing conservation action (e.g., priority conservation areas). Secondly, individual experts contributed different expertise to the spatial prioritization processes in which they were involved, sometimes despite being considered experts in the same field. Individual experts differed to each other in the knowledge they contributed, decisions they made, and in the information content and its spatial representation. Groups of experts collaborating to produce the same information were more effective at capturing expert knowledge than individuals. Thirdly, when seeking to map human and social data to inform the mapping of conservation opportunity, experts were unable to reliably score private landowner's attitudes towards conservation, willingness to partner with organizations and behavior relating to conservation. Experts were able though, to provide accurate knowledge on the general attitudes of landowners, the context of the area in which the research was conducted, and the challenges that landowners in the area face. Collectively, this research can be used to inform the development of standards of best practice to ensure the most effective and cost efficient approach to integrating spatial prioritization software with expert knowledge.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Besluitneming in bewaring moet doeltreffend en effektief wees omdat tyd en hulpbronne skaars is. Bewaringsbeplanning is een proses waardeur aandeelhouers gesamentlik besluite kan neem wanneer hul poog om die voortbestaan van biodiversiteit te verseker. Ruimtelike prioritisering verwys na die proses waar kwantitatiewe data toegepas word op ruimtelike analise om areas vir bewaringsbelegging te selekteer. Dit is 'n afsonderlike proses binne bewaringsbeplanning. Die gebruik van deskundiges in die bepaling van ruimtelike prioritisering en meer algemene bewaringsbeplanning word wyd aanvaar en bepleit maar daar is geen algemene operationele model wat bepaal hoe om hul ten beste in te sluit nie. Aanvaarbare standaarde in die praktyk van die seleksie van kundiges en die aanwending van spesifieke tegnieke om kundige kennisstelsels uit te lok moet ontwikkel en getoets word in verskillende kontekste om robuuste en verdedigbare resultate te verseker. Daar is baie voordele verbonde aan die gebruik van deskundiges en kundige kennisstelsels, ten spyte van hul beperkings. Voordele sluit onder andere tyd- en kostebesparings in. Tydige, beslissende, koste-effektiewe en robuuste besluitneming is noodsaaklik wanneer daar gepoog word om die voortdurende wêreldwye verlies aan biodiversiteit te stuit. Al word hul algemeen gebruik is daar nog baie min navorsing gedoen oor die rol van kundiges tydens die proses van ruimtelike prioritisering. Die rol en gebruik van kundiges en kundige kennisstelsels in die bepaling van ruimtelike prioritisering is deur die volgende prosesse ondersoek: 1) 'n Oorsig van portuurbeoordeelde literatuur wat die rol van en verskillende tipes kuniges wat in ruimtelike prioritisering studies ingesluit word, bestudeer (Hoofstuk 2) ten einde die patrone van hul betrokkenheid te identifiseer; 2) 'n studie wat die proses en verskille tussen die insette en uitkomste van individuele en groepe kundiges, soos geproduseer by 'n tipiese ruimtelike prioritisering werkwinkel, bestudeer ten einde 'n grondlyn daar te stel waarteen kundiges vir toekomstige betrokkenheid geïdentifiseer kan word (Hoostuk 3); en 3) 'n bestudering van die kennis van plaaslike gemeenskaps- en grondbestuur kundiges en hul vermoë om privaat grondeienaars se selfgerapporteerde houdings teenoor bewaring, hul bereidwilligheid om met organisasies saam te werk en gedrag wat verband hou met bewaring te voorspel om te toets of kundige kennis onderhoude sal kan vervang tydens die kartering van bewaringsmoontlikhede (Hoofstuk 4). Die vernaamste bevindinge van hierdie navorsing is, ten eerste, dat kundiges se primêre bydrae tot ruimtelike prioritisering plaasvind deur die kartering van spesies, habitats en ekosisteme (wat alles in ruimtelike prioritisering analise vervat kan word), en meer bepaald die seleksie van areas wat belangrik is vir die implementering van bewaringsaksie (bv. prioriteit bewaringsareas). Tweedens, individuele kundiges se bydrae tot die ruimtelike prioritisering prosesse waar hul betrokke was, het verskil, selfs waar hul as kundiges in dieselfde veld beskou word. Individuele kundiges het van mekaar verskil ten opsigte van die kennis wat hul bygedra het, die besluite wat hul geneem het, die inhoud van inligting en die ruimtelike voorstelling daarvan. Groepe kundiges wat saamwerk om dieselfde inligting op te lewer was meer effektief in die vaslegging van kundige kennis as individuele kundiges. Derdens, tydens die soeke na menslike en maatskaplike data om die kartering van bewaringsmoontlikhede in te lig was kundiges nie in staat is om 'n betroubare skatting van privaat grondeienaars se houdings teenoor bewaring, bereidwilligheid om saam met organisasies te werk en gedrag wat verband hou met bewaring te maak nie. Deskundiges kon egter akkurate kennis meedeel ten opsigte van die algemene houdings van grondeienaars, die konteks van die area van navorsing en die uitdagings wat grondeienaars in die spesifieke areas in die gesig staar. Hierdie navorsing kan gesamentlik gebruik word om die ontwikkeling van standaarde van beste praktyk vas te stel om die mees doeltreffende en koste-effektiewe benadering tot die integrasie van ruimtelike prioritisering sagteware met deskundige kennis te verseker.
Drochon, Victoria. "Le recours aux experts par les instances de représentation du personnel." Thesis, Paris 2, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020046.
Full textBetween 1946 and 2016, this is more than twenty new cases in which the employee representatives were granted the right to resort to the services of experts, and only eight in the last three years. The ever-expanded possibility to be assisted by external experts might suggest that the expertise statutory regime is efficient. The ease with which the law associates experts to each new measures taken in favor of the social dialogue cannot hide the persistent difficulties encountered by the legislator to preserve the original function of expertise : an informative function. The controversial nature of the right to resort to the services of experts and the increasing amount of litigation in this area are manifestations of its failures. A study of the scope and the conditions under which the experts might be appointed urges to the construction of a more coherent system, that would ensure the effectiveness of the right to resort to experts while maintaining the employee representatives’ competence and voices
Books on the topic "Experts"
Parsaye, Kamran. Expert systems for experts. New York: Wiley, 1988.
Find full textParsaye, Kamran. Expert Systems for Experts. New York [etc.]: John Wiley&Sons, 1988.
Find full textParsaye, Kamran. Expert Systems for Experts. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1988.
Find full textBaghramian, Maria, and Carlo Martini. Questioning Experts and Expertise. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003161851.
Full text1957-, Liebowitz Jay, and ESA World Conference (1st : 1989 : Gournay-sur-Marne, France), eds. EXPERSYS-89: Expert systems applications = applications des systemes experts. Gournay-sur-Marne, France: IITT-International, 1989.
Find full textG, Blute Joseph, and Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (1982- ), eds. Experts on experts: Direct and cross-examination of expert witnesses. Boston, MA: MCLE, 1995.
Find full textKnight, Jenny. The experts' expert: Direct hit. London: The Observer magazine, 1989.
Find full textKnight, Jenny. The experts' expert: Set designers. London: The Observer magazine, 1989.
Find full textWillging, Thomas E. Court-appointed experts. Washington, D.C. (Dolley Madison House, 1520 H St., N.W., Washington 20005): Federal Judicial Center, 1986.
Find full textE, Willging Thomas. Court-appointed experts. Washington, D.C: Federal Judicial Center, 1986.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Experts"
Grant, Michael, and Fredrik Nilsson. "Experts and expertise." In Intuitive Expertise and Financial Decision-Making, 9–30. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003035725-2.
Full textKjeldsen, Jens E., Ragnhild Mølster, and Øyvind Ihlen. "Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situations of Uncertainty." In The Pandemic of Argumentation, 85–103. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_5.
Full textEckert, Michael. "Experts." In Ludwig Prandtl, 149–85. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05663-6_6.
Full textVadrot, Alice B. M. "Experts." In Routledge Handbook of Marine Governance and Global Environmental Change, 87–99. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315149745-11.
Full textEriksen, Erik O. "Experts." In The Accountability of Expertise, 173–95. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003175490-10.
Full textWalters, Robert. "Experts." In Cybersecurity and Data Laws of the Commonwealth, 383–92. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3935-0_26.
Full textFeltz, Adam, and Edward T. Cokely. "Philosophical Expertise." In Diversity and Disagreement, 143–74. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61935-9_5.
Full textGrundmann, Reiner. "The Rightful Place of Expertise." In Questioning Experts and Expertise, 18–32. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003161851-3.
Full textBaghramian, Maria, and Carlo Martini. "Introduction: Ubiquitous Questions about Experts and Society." In Questioning Experts and Expertise, 1–4. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003161851-1.
Full textCollins, Harry. "Are Experts Right or are They Members of Expert Groups?" In Questioning Experts and Expertise, 90–96. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003161851-8.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Experts"
Powell, P. L., J. H. Klein, and N. A. D. Connell. "Experts and expertise." In the 1993 conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/158011.158245.
Full textShavit, Amit, and Sameena Shah. "Perceived, Projected, and True Investment Expertise: Not All Experts Provide Expert Recommendations." In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dsaa.2016.45.
Full textPresley, Steven, Jeffrey Landry, Jordan Shropshire, and Philip Menard. "Using Experts for Improving Project Cybersecurity Risk Scenarios." In 2022 KSU CONFERENCE ON CYBERSECURITY EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND PRACTICE. Kennesaw State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.32727/28.2023.7.
Full textHemmer, Patrick, Sebastian Schellhammer, Michael Vössing, Johannes Jakubik, and Gerhard Satzger. "Forming Effective Human-AI Teams: Building Machine Learning Models that Complement the Capabilities of Multiple Experts." In Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-22}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/344.
Full textKawase, Yasushi, Yuko Kuroki, and Atsushi Miyauchi. "Graph Mining Meets Crowdsourcing: Extracting Experts for Answer Aggregation." In Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-19}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/177.
Full textSprain, Leah, Andy M. Merolla, and Martin Carcasson. "Do Experts Help or Hinder? An Empirical Examination of Experts and Expertise during Public Deliberation." In 2016: Confronting the challenges of public participation in environmental, planning and health decision-making. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-84.
Full textGalaskea, Patrick, Mehdi Farida, and Klaus Benglerb. "Influence of Expertise on the Judgment of Controllability of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems." In Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference. AHFE International, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100649.
Full textBennett, Paul N., and Nam Nguyen. "Refined experts." In the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1571941.1571946.
Full textDorn, Brian, and Allison Elliott Tew. "Becoming experts." In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445252.
Full textWittie, Lea, Anastasia Kurdia, and Meriel Huggard. "Recruiting Experts." In SIGCSE '18: The 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3162210.
Full textReports on the topic "Experts"
Kurlat, Pablo, and Florian Scheuer. Signaling to Experts. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23817.
Full textSHpinev, YU S. Freelance experts in state environmental expertise: analysis of legislative initiatives. Ljournal, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/1311-1972-2020-00015.
Full textFrankel, Alexander, and Michael Schwarz. Experts and Their Records. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w14921.
Full textKirk, Bernadette Lugue, Ronald A. Cain, Shaheen A. Dewji, and Carla L. Agreda. Succession planning for technical experts. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1408004.
Full textAgarwal, Sumit, Bernardo Morais, Amit Seru, and Kelly Shue. Noisy Experts? Discretion in Regulation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w32344.
Full textNordhaus, William, and Douglas Rivers. The People and the Experts. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, May 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w31217.
Full textFinin, Timothy W., Aravind K. Joshi, and Bonnie L. Webber. Natural Language Interactions with Artificial Experts. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada460952.
Full textAlbornoz, Facundo, Guillermo Cruces, and María Lombardi. Trusting Covid-19 recommendations: The role of experts, markets and governments. Inter-American Development Bank, August 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0005097.
Full textKofanov, Andrii, and Olena Kofanova. FORENSIC EXPERTS' MISTAKES: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS. Intellectual Archive, March 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.32370/online/2019_03_25_2.
Full textBeedle, Christopher, and Mary Vecellio. SGL Resources for instructors and reachback experts. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1864982.
Full text