Academic literature on the topic 'Excision margins'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Excision margins.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Excision margins"
Subhas, Gokulakkrishna, Asha J. Shah, Aditya Gupta, Jonathan Cook, Linda Dubay, Sumet Silapaswan, Ramachandra Kolachalam, et al. "Review of Third and Fourth Re-Excision for Narrow or Positive Margins of Invasive and Intraductal Carcinoma." International Surgery 96, no. 1 (January 1, 2011): 18–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.9738/1340.1.
Full textOzmen, V., S. Ozkan Gurdal, M. Muslumanoglu, A. Igci, S. S. Tuzlali, B. Ozcinar, E. Canbay, M. Kecer, and T. Dagoglu. "Predictive factor for residual tumor after lumpectomy for close margins." Journal of Clinical Oncology 27, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2009): e11538-e11538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e11538.
Full textSemple, Harriet K., and Marc J. Langbart. "Margin of error: accuracy of estimated excision margins by surgical experience." Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery 5, no. 1 (March 31, 2022): 13–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v5n1.257.
Full textO’Connell, L., S. Walsh, D. Evoy, A. O’Doherty, C. Quinn, J. Rothwell, J. Geraghty, EW McDermott, and R. Prichard. "The approach to an isolated close anterior margin in breast conserving surgery." Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 101, no. 4 (April 2019): 268–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2019.0017.
Full textGhosh, S., S. Duvvi, P. Goodyear, E. Reddy, and A. Kumar. "Evaluation of surgeons' marking of excision margins for superficial facial skin cancer lesions." Journal of Laryngology & Otology 123, no. 2 (May 19, 2008): 195–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022215108002612.
Full textSebastian, Mary L., Alice Marie Police, Stephanie Akbari, and Beth Anglin. "Combined experience at three breast centers with routine use of an intraoperative margin assessment device including comparison to historical re-excision rates." Journal of Clinical Oncology 32, no. 26_suppl (September 10, 2014): 79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.26_suppl.79.
Full textLupu, Mihai, Vlad Mihai Voiculescu, Ana Caruntu, Tiberiu Tebeica, and Constantin Caruntu. "Preoperative Evaluation through Dermoscopy and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy of the Lateral Excision Margins for Primary Basal Cell Carcinoma." Diagnostics 11, no. 1 (January 14, 2021): 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010120.
Full textRoss, M. "Margins of excision." Melanoma Research 3, no. 1 (March 1993): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008390-199303000-00020.
Full textBatsakis, John G. "Surgical Excision Margins." Advances in Anatomic Pathology 6, no. 3 (May 1999): 140–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00125480-199905000-00002.
Full textSchnabel, Freya Ruth, Shira Schwartz, Deirdre Kiely, and Jennifer Chun. "Improving breast-conserving surgery: A focus on margins." Journal of Clinical Oncology 31, no. 31_suppl (November 1, 2013): 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.31_suppl.127.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Excision margins"
Nashidengo, Pueya Mekondjo. "Five-year review of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for breast carcinoma: Surgical margins, re-excision and local recurrence in a single tertiary center." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24506.
Full textMilan, Ranisavljević. "Дијагностичка вредност мобилне дигиталне радиографије у процени позитивности ресекционих хируршких маргина код карцинома дојке." Phd thesis, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet u Novom Sadu, 2020. https://www.cris.uns.ac.rs/record.jsf?recordId=114074&source=NDLTD&language=en.
Full textBreast cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm in the female population, and conservative breast therapy is the preferred treatment model for patients in early stages of the disease. The optimal surgical resection margin, from healthy breast tissue around the primary tumor is 2 mm. Many methods have been described that serve to check the resection margin during breast conservative surgery and all of them have their advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this study was to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in the determination of the width of the negative resection margin expressed in millimeters in breast cancer surgery using palpatory method and intraoperative mobile specimen radiography, comparing the findings of measuring of surgeons with greater and lesser experience in breast cancer surgery as well as the findings of the radiologist in relation to histopathological ex tempore and definitive histopathological analysis. The study was conducted as a retrospective - prospective study at the Clinic for Operative Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina and included 150 patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with breast cancer. The criterion for inclusion in the study was the opportunity to perform breast conservative surgery with or without complete axillary lymph node dissection. Patients that were treated with breast amputation, those with radiological confirmed disseminated disease, as well as patients previously operated from cancer were excluded from the study. For all 150 extirpated breast cancers, an estimate of the width of the resection surgical margin was performed intraoperatively with a palpatory method, followed by measuring on device for mobile specimen digital radiography, and a radiogram was analyzed by an experienced and less experienced surgeon in breast cancer surgery, as well as by a radiologist and compared with an ex tempore histopathological analysis. The definitive width of the resection surgical margin was confirmed on histopathological preparations. The mean follow-up, postoperatively, was 100.97 weeks. The majority of patients belonged to the elderly age (56.67%). Preoperative localization of clinically impalpable breast tumors was performed in 52 (34.67%) patients. Most often the tumor was presented as a solitary focus with surrounding foci of in situ cancer (72, 48%), while the most common histological subtype was invasive ductal breast cancer (112 (74.67%)). The majority of breast operations were characterized like quadrantectomy (85 (56.67)), while the most frequent axillary surgery was the determination of the sentinel lymph node (119 (79.33%). No significant difference was observed in the evaluation of radiography quality and the width of the resection surgical margin measured on the mobile digital radiography device between the experienced surgeon and the radiologist. No statistically significant difference was observed in the measurement of the width of the resection surgical margin expressed in millimeters on the mobile digital radiography device by the experienced surgeon and radiologist versus ex tempore histopathological analysis, while the statistical difference was observed after definite histopathological analysis. The chance of breast tissue reexcision after measurement on a mobile digital radiography device is 1.4 times higher than after histopathological ex tempore analysis. Local relapse occurred in one patient during the follow-up period. There is no statistically significant difference in the determination of the width of the resection surgical margin expressed in millimeters using a mobile digital radiography device by an experienced surgeon in breast cancer surgery and radiologist with respect to histopathological ex tempore analysis. However, the statistical difference exists after radiogram analysis by a less experienced surgeon. The palpatory method cannot be considered as a safe method in determining the width of a surgical resection margin. There is no statistically significant difference in the number of breast tissue additional resections between surgeons with different surgical experience.
Roussel, Lucas. "Diagnostiquer le cancer de l'ovaire grâce à la technologie SpiderMass." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université de Lille (2022-....), 2023. https://pepite-depot.univ-lille.fr/ToutIDP/EDBSL/2023/2023ULILS121.pdf.
Full textOvarian cancer (OC) is the deadliest gynecological cancer, causing over 200,000 deaths worldwide every year. Diagnosis of OC is extremely difficult and late diagnosis leads to delays in patient management thus reducing the chances of survival. Against this backdrop, we have developed a real-time diagnostic and prognostic tool: SpiderMass. Initially, to enable early diagnosis and preventive action, we focused on the origin of the most aggressive OC subtype: high-grade serous cancer (HGSOC). Following the discovery of lipid and protein markers specific to pre-neoplastic lesions of the fimbria, we highlighted the underlying mechanisms linked to these lesions and confirmed that they were at the origin of HGSOC. Secondly, we studied all the lipid molecular signatures specific to the different OC subtypes to build a classification model using SpiderMass technology for diagnostic. This model, combining both molecular and patient morphological data, was able to recognize all subtypes in real time ex vivo. We have also developed a new mass spectrometry imaging model enabling direct visualization of different immune cells within tissues. This model provides an accurate diagnosis of the different types of ovarian cancer, and can associate a prognosis with them, given that patient survival is closely linked to the infiltration of immune cells within the tumor. We have demonstrated that this imaging model is applicable to several types of cancer, including ovarian cancer and glioblastoma. Combined with these innovative models, SpiderMass guides the surgeon during the operation to reduce excision margins and provides a reliable diagnosis and prognosis to propose the best treatment to the patient
Addae, Haleema. "The impact of positive margins and crypt involvement in excisional procedures of the cervix on recurrence rates of premalignant diseases of the cervix." Master's thesis, Faculty of Health Sciences, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33427.
Full textHenriques, Valéria José Gonçalves. "Margem cirúrgica no melanoma: Que evidência?" Master's thesis, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/98308.
Full textIntrodução: O melanoma cutâneo é uma neoplasia maligna com origem nos melanócitos. Ocorre com maior frequência em caucasianos de pele clara e com dificuldade em bronzear. O tratamento de primeira linha é a excisão cirúrgica da lesão com margens de segurança que variam de acordo com o índice de Breslow. Com este trabalho pretende-se perceber se será mesmo necessário adaptar a abordagem cirúrgica ou se, pelo contrário, todos os melanomas poderão ser excisados com a mesma margem de segurança, independentemente da sua espessura.Materiais e Métodos: Para o desenvolvimento desta revisão bibliográfica, foi feita uma pesquisa na PubMed com as chaves de pesquisa “malignant melanoma narrow wide” e “malignant melanoma 1cm 2cm” e, restringindo-se os resultados aos últimos 10 anos, selecionaram-se 9 artigos para análise pormenorizada. Além disso, foram incluídas guidelines e outros artigos pertinentes. Desenvolvimento: De acordo com a maioria dos estudos, a margem periférica de 2 cm não traz vantagens, quando comparada com a margem de 1 cm. De destacar que, quando se aplica uma margem de 2 cm, é mais frequente a necessidade de recorrer a reconstruções e a necrose dos retalhos/perda de enxerto ocorre também com maior frequência. Em relação à margem profunda, constata-se que quanto mais profunda for a remoção, melhor será o prognóstico dos doentes. No entanto, a fáscia muscular deverá ser mantida.Conclusão: Todos os melanomas cutâneos deverão ser removidos, em profundidade, até à fáscia muscular. Perifericamente, aplicar uma margem de segurança de 1 cm será suficiente nos melanomas até 4 mm. Quando a espessura for superior, sugere-se uma margem de 2 cm.
Introduction: The cutaneous melanoma is a malignant neoplasm originating from melanocytes. It occurs more frequently in Caucasians with fair skin and with difficulty in tanning. The first-line treatment is a surgical excision of the lesion with safety margins that vary according to the Breslow index. This work aims at understanding whether it will be necessary to adapt the surgical approach to each patient or whether all patients can be excised with the same margin, regardless of the thickness of the malignant lesion.Material and Methods: For carrying-out of this bibliographic review, a search was made at PubMed with the search keys “malignant melanoma narrow wide” and “malignant melanoma 1cm 2cm”. After restricting the results to articles published in the last 10 years, 9 articles were selected for further analysis. In addition, guidelines and other relevant articles have been included.Results: According to most studies, an excision surgery with a peripheral safety margin of 2 cm does not bring advantages when compared to the same surgery with a peripheral safety margin of 1 cm. It should be noted that when a margin of 2 cm is applied, necrosis/graft loss is more frequent, and reconstruction is more often necessary. Regarding the deep margin, it appears that the deeper the removal, the better the prognosis of patients. However, the muscular fascia should be maintained. Conclusion: All cutaneous melanomas must be removed in depth up to the muscular fascia. Peripherally, applying a safety margin of 1 cm will be sufficient for melanomas up to 4 mm. Whenever the thickness is greater than 4 mm, a margin of 2 cm is suggested.
Noel, Carolyn Joyce. "Excision margins in human immunodeficiency virus seropositive women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical dysplasia." Thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10539/18505.
Full textHIV accelerates the development of cervical cancer by up to15 years. South Africa is currently in the midst of an HIV epidemic. With limited facilities for colposcopy it is vital to identify risk factors within the HIV positive population resulting in positive margins after Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) and persistence of cytological abnormalities on follow-up Pap smears. Objective: The primary objective was to determine the patient risk factors, pre and during colposcopy and LLETZ biopsy, which resulted in the histological involvement of margins of the LLETZ biopsy and persistent cervical dysplasia on follow-up Pap smears. Secondary objectives included determining follow up rate of patients at the clinic as well as the correlation between the original Pap smear cytology grade and the histological grade found on histology of the LLETZ biopsy. Methods: A retrospective review of the files of HIV seropositive patients was done at the colposcopy clinic at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital after the roll out of antiretroviral treatment for the period 1 April 2004 to 31 October 2012. Patients with abnormal pap smears during this time were referred to the colposcopy clinic where a colposcopy and LLETZ biopsies were done. Demographic and clinical data in regards to age, gravidity, contraception, CD4 count, antiretroviral usage, and referral time was collected. Data from the clinical description of the colposcopy and histology of the LLETZ biopsy was also collected. Patients followed up again after 6 months when a repeat pap smear was done. The results of these Pap smears were also collected. Data was then analysed and variate and multivariate logistical regression was used to find statistically significant correlations. Results: A total of 480 files were found to have complete clinical records. One hundred and sixty eight (42.71%) patients had both endo and ectocervical margins clear. Predictive factors for the involvement of endocervical margins was the doctor performing the procedure (p-value <0.01) cytology of the original Pap smear (p value <0.01) and the grade of histological abnormality found at time of LLETZ (p-value <0.01). The statistically significant predictive factors for ectocervical margin involvement was the visualization of the transformation zone at colposcopy (p-value <0.01), the size of lesion found at colposcopy (p-value <0.01), the use of combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) (p-value 0.02) and the histological grade of abnormality found on the LLETZ biopsy. Age, parity, CD4 count, use of antiretroviral drugs, length of time from Pap smear to colposcopy and use of contraception other than OCP were not found to be statistically significant in our sample population for the involvement of either endo or ectocervical margins. Statistically significant risk factors for the recurrence of intraepithelial lesions on follow up Pap smear was having both endo and ectocervical margin involvement on histology (p-value 0.01) The Ectocervical margin alone was found to have a p-value of <0.01. Abnormal cytology on follow up Pap smear was found in 58.69% of patients. The follow up rate at the clinic was 46.04%. Correlation of cytological grade and histological grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm in our sample population was found to be adequate (p-value <0.01). Conclusion: Incomplete incision of the intraepithelial lesion was found to be a significant risk factor for the recurrence of cytological abnormality in patients undergoing LLETZ biopsy. Identifying patients at increased risk for recurrence is important to ensure close follow up in this patient population.
Chang, Chih-chia, and 張志嘉. "3D US imaging in margin evaluation for malignant breast tumor excision using Mammotome." Thesis, 2002. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/21209706983904264104.
Full text國立中正大學
資訊工程研究所
90
In this paper, we use the 3D ultrasound dataset for evaluating the malignant breast tumor contour and the excision margin after the surgical operation called Mammotome. And the result can help the physician evaluating the surgical outcome. The 3D ultrasound dataset is composed of a series of 2D images, however, the traditional 2D image segmentation methods can’t extract reasonable contour due to the characteristics of ultrasound — noises and speckles. We proposed a modified edge-based segmentation method for finding the contour in this paper. By using anisotropic diffusion, the noises and speckles in ultrasound image can be removed while the most edge information is reserved. Further more, applying the stick detection for enhancing the edge. Finally, using range image and edge connection method to extract the good tumor contour and excision margin. The physician can observe that if the tumor is fully removed or is still residual by calculating these two margins. The purpose of this study is to provide the inspection of the tumor removal situation. If a small malignant tumor can be removed completely by Mammotome under the help by the proposed method, then the cosmetic result will be further improved in the breast conserving surgery.
曾姿綺. "3D snake for US in margin evaluation for malignant breast tumor excision using mammotome." Thesis, 2002. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/95264239380961050796.
Full textBooks on the topic "Excision margins"
Glynn Bolitho, D. Tumours and hand reconstruction. Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199550647.003.006012.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Excision margins"
Ferrari, Marco, Nausica Montalto, and Piero Nicolai. "Novel Approaches in Surgical Management: How to Assess Surgical Margins." In Critical Issues in Head and Neck Oncology, 95–110. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63234-2_7.
Full textGareau, Daniel S., Kishwer Nehal, and Milind Rajadhyaksha. "Confocal Mosaicing Microscopy in Skin Excisions: Feasibility of Cancer Margin Screening at the Bedside to Guide Mohs Surgery." In Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Skin Diseases, 449–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21997-9_33.
Full textCody, Hiram. "Re-Excision of Margins." In Atlas of Procedures in Breast Cancer Surgery, 57–62. CRC Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/9780203491645-9.
Full textTsabazis, Nikolaos, Anastasia Vatopoulou, and Angelos Daniilidis. "Non-Free Surgical Margins After LLETZ-LEEP." In Handbook of Research on Oncological and Endoscopical Dilemmas in Modern Gynecological Clinical Practice, 129–38. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4213-2.ch010.
Full textGruber, Elizabeth A. "Excision Margins in High-Risk Malignant Melanoma." In 50 Landmark Papers every Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeon Should Know, 201–6. CRC Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429288036-37.
Full textScase, Tim. "What your pathologist does with your sample and how they assess margins of tumour excision." In BSAVA Congress Proceedings 2018, 208. British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.22233/9781910443590.28.1.
Full textAngus, Bill. "Literature: Liminal Ground in Early Modern Drama." In A History of Crossroads in Early Modern Culture, 129–53. Edinburgh University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474499828.003.0006.
Full text"Marginal Excision." In Encyclopedia of Cancer, 2168. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16483-5_3538.
Full textKersten, Robert C. "Management of Periocular Neoplasms." In Surgery of the Eyelid, Lacrimal System, and Orbit. Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195340211.003.0007.
Full textBernardino, C. Robert. "Reconstruction of Canthal Defects." In Surgery of the Eyelid, Lacrimal System, and Orbit. Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195340211.003.0010.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Excision margins"
Rounds, Cody C., Jaron de Wit, Jasper Vonk, Floris Voskuil, Max J. H. Witjes, and Kenneth M. Tichauer. "Margin status assessment using a ratio-metric angular domain fluorescent imaging approach in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma." In Optical Molecular Probes, Imaging and Drug Delivery. Washington, D.C.: Optica Publishing Group, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/omp.2023.ow3e.3.
Full textEl-Helou, Etienne, Claudia Stanciu-Pop, Michel Moreau, Marie Chintinne, Nicolas Sirtaine, Denis Larsimont, Isabelle Veys, and Catalin Florin Pop. "MACROSCOPIC EVALUATION OF THE PATHOLOGICAL MARGIN IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER DURING BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY." In Brazilian Breast Cancer Symposium 2022. Mastology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29289/259453942022v32s2059.
Full textMullen, R., EJ Macaskill, A. Khalil, E. Elseedawy, DC Brown, AC Lee, C. Purdie, L. Jordan, and AM Thompson. "P3-12-04: Involved Anterior Margins after Breast Conserving Surgery: Is Re-Excision Required?" In Abstracts: Thirty-Fourth Annual CTRC‐AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium‐‐ Dec 6‐10, 2011; San Antonio, TX. American Association for Cancer Research, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p3-12-04.
Full textBelluco, Rosana Zabulon Feijó, Melissa de Andrade Baqueiro, Vitória Vasconcelos de Lara Resende, Flávio Lúcio Vasconcelos, and Jefferson Lessa Soares de Macedo. "EXTENSIVE DERMATOFIBROSARCOMA PROTUBERANS IN THE CHEST AND BREAST: A CASE REPORT." In XXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Mastologia. Mastology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29289/259453942022v32s1033.
Full textEl-Helou, Etienne, Manar Zaiter, Pauline Delrue, Ahmad Awada, Isabelle Veys, and Catalin-Florin Pop. "INCIDENTAL FINDING OF SOLITARY FIBROUS TUMOR OF MALE BREAST." In Brazilian Breast Cancer Symposium 2022. Mastology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29289/259453942022v32s2087.
Full textPereira, Antonio Cesar, Rogerio Bizinoto Ferreira, Delio Marques Conde, Alexandre Marchiori Xavier de Jesus, Ana Beatriz Marinho de Jesus Teixeira, Sebastião Alves Pinto, and Sergi Vidal Sicart. "OCCULT LESIONS LOCALIZATION AND “IN VIVO” MARGINS EVALUATION OF BREAST CARCINOMA DETECTED BY NEW HYBRID TECHNIQUE USING RADIOFLUORESCENCE—A PILOT STUDY." In Abstracts from the Brazilian Breast Cancer Symposium - BBCS 2021. Mastology, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29289/259453942021v31s2019.
Full textShipp, Dustin, Emad Rakha, Alexey Koloydenko, Douglas Macmillan, Ian Ellis, and Ioan Notingher. "Intra-operative Assessment of Excision margins During Breast Conserving Surgery by Integrated Raman Microscopy and Auto-fluorescence Imaging." In Clinical and Translational Biophotonics. Washington, D.C.: OSA, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/translational.2018.ctu4b.5.
Full textRazvi, K., K. Rothnie, T. Speed, and S. Clark. "EP1085 Surgical margins of large loop excision of the transformation zone: histological comparison with patient characteristics and colposcopists' experience." In ESGO Annual Meeting Abstracts. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-esgo.1127.
Full textRoh, Ju-Won, Jongseung Kim, Grace J. Lee, and Min-Jeong Kim. "220 Lugol’s solution reduces positive margins and residual disease after the large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)." In ESGO 2024 Congress Abstracts. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-esgo.140.
Full textSantos, Mayra de Oliveira, Patrícia Bittencourt Marques Lauria, Isadora Maria de Oliveira Santos, Maxlânio Azevedo Borges, Cristiana Buzelin Nunes, Jane Braga da Silva, and Clécio Ênio Murta de Lucena. "CONSERVATIVE SURGERY IN ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA: A CASE REPORT." In Brazilian Breast Cancer Symposium 2022. Mastology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29289/259453942022v32s2090.
Full text