To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Evaluation standards.

Journal articles on the topic 'Evaluation standards'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Evaluation standards.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Wellek, S., J. L. Willems, and J. Michaelis. "Reference Standards for Software Evaluation." Methods of Information in Medicine 29, no. 04 (1990): 289–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1634806.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe field of automated ECG analysis was one of the earliest topics in Medical Informatics and may be regarded as a model both for computer-assisted medical diagnosis and for evaluating medical diagnostic programs. The CSE project has set reference standards of two kinds: In a broad sense, a standard how to perform a comprehensive evaluation study, in a narrow sense, standards as specific references for evaluating computer ECG programs. The evaluation methodology used within the CSE project is described as a basis for presentation of results which are published elsewhere in this issue.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Brigham, Christopher R. "Clinical Update: IME Report Standards: Independent Medical Evaluation Report Standards." Guides Newsletter 7, no. 5 (September 1, 2002): 4–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2002.sepoct02.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Independent medical examinations (IMEs) are performed by a physician or another health care provider who is not involved in the examinee's care and for the purpose of clarifying medical and case issues. Poor quality evaluations and reports are unfair to both the client and the examinee, and this article presents standards of a quality IME report. Evaluators should know the purpose of the IME so the length and detail of the examination are sufficient to address the questions posed with supportable conclusions. One table lists common issues in IMEs, another explains them, and a third divides the preparation of reports into three steps: clinical evaluation, calculation of the impairment rating, and discussion of how the impairment rating was calculated. A fourth table includes an extensive checklist that lists the components of most quality IME reports. The use of templates assists in ensuring a best-practices approach to the evaluation. Most experienced examiners use questionnaires, pain drawings, and inventories as an adjunct to the interview, and the process must be planned carefully to ensure all relevant history and subjective information are obtained. All reports should be completed as soon as possible following the evaluation to ensure efficiency and to generate a report of the highest quality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Carlson, Allan. "Work on the neutron standards since the completion of the standards evaluation." EPJ Web of Conferences 239 (2020): 08001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023908001.

Full text
Abstract:
An evaluation of the neutron standards that included the neutron cross section standards was recently completed. It is important to maintain experimental programs to increase the quality and extend the database for the neutron cross section standards in order to improve evaluations of them. In this paper work will be reported on new or continuing efforts on the cross section standards including that on the 30 keV Maxwellian averaged cross section for the 197Au(n,γ) reaction that is now a standard and is used in neutron capture cross section measurements as a standard for reactions important for astrophysics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Newman, Dianna L., and Robert D. Brown. "Violations of Evaluation Standards." Evaluation Review 16, no. 3 (June 1992): 219–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9201600301.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Picciotto, Robert. "Evaluation and Accounting Standards." Public Money and Management 24, no. 2 (April 2004): 84–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2004.00398.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

AM, Pat Barrett. "Performance Standards and Evaluation." Australian Journal of Public Administration 56, no. 3 (September 1997): 96–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb01269.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lester, Frank K., and Diana Lambdin Kroll. "Implementing The Standards: Evaluation: A New Vision." Mathematics Teacher 84, no. 4 (April 1991): 276–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/mt.84.4.0276.

Full text
Abstract:
Teaching according to the vision of the NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards will involve numerous changes in the content and instruction of the school mathematics program. Moreover, this vision will also require a change in testing procedures and methods for evaluating the effectiveness of instructional practices (Clarke, Clarke, and Lovitt 1990; EQUALS and California Mathematics Council 1989; NAEP 1987; NCTM 1989). As is pointed out in NCTM's curriculum standards, an evaluation program that is properly aligned with the proposed curriculum standards can no longer use only written tests. Calculators, computers, and manipulatives must be included in the evaluation process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Yang, Chang Yeul, and Bowon Kim. "STANDARDS AND INDEXES FOR EVALUATING OPEN UNIVERSITIES." Asian Association of Open Universities Journal 5, no. 1 (March 1, 2010): 32–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-05-01-2010-b005.

Full text
Abstract:
This article is the second part of the research on the institutional evaluation of the open universities. The title of the first one was ‘Evaluation Standards for Institutional Evaluation of Open Universities,’ which was presented at the 22nd AAOU Annual Conference, Tianjin, China. In the previous study we discussed the definition of university evaluation and some of the controversial points in the existing evaluation. The focal point was that the existing standards and indexes are not appropriate for Korea National Open University (KNOU) as an open university, and that it is necessary to establish a new evaluating system for the university. We believe it is true of the other open universities throughout Asia and the world. In short, the present research provides the practical and effective data on the evaluation standard. It also includes some new qualitative, quantitative and modified evaluation indexes reflecting the distinctive features of the open universities. The main part of this article elaborates on 5 evaluation domains, 23 evaluation sections, 81 evaluation items and 229 evaluation indexes. These evaluation domains, sections, items and indexes result from the practical surveys and AHP and Swing analyses. The result of this research will prove a good and essential element for ranking indicators in ODE universities. At the end of the paper we add some new standards and indexes for evaluating regional campuses of the open universities, which is another important agenda for upgrading the learner support throughout the country.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Brown, Robert D., and Dianna L. Newman. "Ethical Principles and Evaluation Standards." Evaluation Review 16, no. 6 (December 1992): 650–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9201600605.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Norcini, J. J. "Standards and reliability in evaluation." Academic Medicine 74, no. 10 (October 1999): 1088–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199910000-00010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Alicke, Mark D. "Egocentric Standards of Conduct Evaluation." Basic and Applied Social Psychology 14, no. 2 (June 1993): 171–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1402_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Rugh, Jim. "The CARE international evaluation standards." New Directions for Evaluation 2004, no. 104 (2004): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ev.138.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Miller, Diane Teel, and Michael D. Olsen. "Setting Standards for Faculty Evaluation." Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 29, no. 2 (August 1988): 46–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001088048802900217.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Kiesler, Charles A., and Teru L. Morton. "Not Up to Evaluation Standards." Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 34, no. 7 (July 1989): 693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/030934.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Franks, John B. "The Evaluation of Community Standards." Journal of Social Psychology 139, no. 2 (April 1999): 253–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224549909598382.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Kumar, P. Pavan, and G. Balachandran. "Microinclusion Evaluation Using Various Standards." Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals 72, no. 4 (January 17, 2019): 877–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12666-018-1546-y.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Sando, Carol R., Rita M. Coggins, Colleen Meakim, Ashley E. Franklin, Donna Gloe, Teri Boese, Sharon Decker, Lori Lioce, and Jimmie C. Borum. "Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard VII: Participant Assessment and Evaluation." Clinical Simulation in Nursing 9, no. 6 (June 2013): S30—S32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Husereau, Don, Michael Drummond, Stavros Petrou, Chris Carswell, David Moher, Dan Greenberg, Federico Augustovski, Andrew H. Briggs, Josephine Mauskopf, and Elizabeth Loder. "CONSOLIDATED HEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION REPORTING STANDARDS (CHEERS) STATEMENT." International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 29, no. 2 (April 2013): 117–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462313000160.

Full text
Abstract:
Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication.The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp).We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Lindquist, Mary Montgomery. "Implementing the Standards: the Measurement Standards." Arithmetic Teacher 37, no. 2 (October 1989): 22–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/at.37.2.0022.

Full text
Abstract:
Clear expectations for the measurement curricula of grades K–8 are expressed in the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989). The statements in figure 1 are discussed in the Standards. Central to both the K–4 and 5–8 standards is the process of measuring, which can help students build understanding about measuring and make connections among various measurement concepts and skills.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Bacon, Donald R., Pallab Paul, Kim A. Stewart, and Kausiki Mukhopadhyay. "A New Tool for Identifying Research Standards and Evaluating Research Performance." Journal of Marketing Education 34, no. 2 (July 9, 2012): 194–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475312450389.

Full text
Abstract:
Much has been written about the evaluation of faculty research productivity in promotion and tenure decisions, including many articles that seek to determine the rank of various marketing journals. Yet how faculty evaluators combine journal quality, quantity, and author contribution to form judgments of a scholar’s performance is unclear. A mathematical model of faculty judgment is presented that estimates a scholar’s research productivity that is surprisingly consistent with actual faculty evaluations. The model does not replace human judgment in evaluating a scholar’s research performance, but the model enhances clarity and objectivity in the evaluation process. The method is demonstrated with marketing faculty at one university.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Kim, Bowon, and Chang Yeul Yang. "EVALUATION STANDARD FOR INSTITUSIONAL EVALUATION OF OPEN UNIVERSITY." Asian Association of Open Universities Journal 4, no. 1 (March 1, 2009): 14–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-04-01-2009-b002.

Full text
Abstract:
This study is to develop the standards and indexes for evaluating the open university as an institution. Having successfully taken root in their societies since their launching, Asian open universities now need to further up their teaching and learning system which demands a rigid evaluation and assessment of a university as an institution. For the past ten years, Korea National Open University (KNOU) was evaluated twice by Korean Council for University Education (KCUE), which is in charge of the evaluation of the Korean universities; the result was not so satisfactory. It was because its evaluation standards and indexes were not appropriate for KNOU as an open university. They were primarily for the conventional universities. Thus KNOU needed its own assessment indexes, and this is a research looking for the proper ones for evaluating KNOU within the frame of university evaluation in Korea. Other open universities in Asia also have experienced or will face such problems in terms of the university evaluation. The result of this research will be helpful not only for KNOU but for other Asian open universities preparing for the university evaluation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Morrow, Lorna J., and Thomas E. Rowan. "Implementing The Standards: Geometry through the Standards." Arithmetic Teacher 38, no. 8 (April 1991): 21–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/at.38.8.0021.

Full text
Abstract:
An underlying view of mathematics education expressed in the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards (NCTM 1989) is that a student should be actively involved both mentally and physically in constructing his or her own mathematical knowledge: “The K-4 curriculum should actively involve children in doing mathematics. … [They should] explore, justify, represent, solve, construct, discuss, use, investigate, describe, develop, and predict” (NCTM 1989, 17).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Kim, Kuk-Hyun. "The Conceptual Confusion of Achievement Standards and Direction for Developing Achievement Standards and Evaluation Standard in Moral Education." Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation 12, no. 3 (November 2009): 125–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.29221/jce.2009.12.3.125.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Balmer, Dorene F., Janet M. Riddle, and Deborah Simpson. "Program Evaluation: Getting Started and Standards." Journal of Graduate Medical Education 12, no. 3 (June 1, 2020): 345–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-20-00265.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Page, Mark, Dianna E. Wilkinson, Giada Mattiuzzo, Stacey Efstathiou, and Philip Minor. "Developing biological standards for vaccine evaluation." Future Virology 12, no. 8 (August 2017): 431–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2017-0003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Carlson, A. D., V. G. Pronyaev, R. Capote, G. M. Hale, Z. P. Chen, I. Duran, F. J. Hambsch, et al. "Evaluation of the Neutron Data Standards." Nuclear Data Sheets 148 (February 2018): 143–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Mansfield-Devine, Steve. "Setting standards for evaluation and testing." Biometric Technology Today 2014, no. 11 (November 2014): 5–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0969-4765(14)70179-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Murdoch, Neil. "Justified design evaluation for percentile standards." Environmental Modelling & Software 16, no. 8 (December 2001): 725–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00037-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Galimberti, Viviana. "Evaluation of regional lymphnodes: New standards?" Breast 12 (March 2003): S5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9776(03)80009-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Covert, Robert W. "Ethics in evaluation: Beyond the standards." Evaluation Practice 9, no. 1 (February 1988): 32–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0886-1633(88)80019-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Luo, C. "Science for Sale: Fair Evaluation Standards." Science 343, no. 6167 (January 9, 2014): 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.343.6167.137-a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Holmes-Rovner, Margaret. "Evaluation Standards for Patient Decision Supports." Medical Decision Making 15, no. 1 (February 1995): 2–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9501500102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Waikar, Sushrut S., Rebecca A. Betensky, Sarah C. Emerson, and Joseph V. Bonventre. "Imperfect gold standards for biomarker evaluation." Clinical Trials: Journal of the Society for Clinical Trials 10, no. 5 (September 3, 2013): 696–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774513497540.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

John, Craig St. "Racial Differences in Neighborhood Evaluation Standards." Urban Affairs Quarterly 22, no. 3 (March 1987): 377–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004208168702200302.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Jawad, Kazem Ahmed, and Shaimaa Jabbar Aliwi. "Evaluation ` Quality Standards of Education Sector." Iraqi Administrative Sciences Journal 1, no. 1 (March 30, 2017): 309–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.33013/iqasj.v1n1y2017.pp309-333.

Full text
Abstract:
The study aimed to evaluate and develop quality standards in the education sector, through sampling the opinion of stakeholders the current standards and make the development it as it notes the existence of problematic standards in the current standards and thus th eir inability to diagnose the actual reality of education, the study was based on the case study method and homeliness and field interviews with those involved in order to get the data, it has been a form design included the proposed standards for adoption instead of the current standards has also been used a number of statistical methods and standards including the global exploratory analysis and so with the help of statistical program (SPSS) :The current study findings to a set of conclusions was the most important:The existence of a concrete blurry and weak when managers regarding the application of knowledge standards, The study concluded a set of recommendations Perhaps the most important: increased support and develop managers and teachers the ability to establish positive relationships with students and colleagues at work, taking into account the need to adopt standards proposed and obtained the agreement of the study sample.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Love, Arnold, and Craig Russon. "Evaluation standards in an international context." New Directions for Evaluation 2004, no. 104 (2004): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ev.132.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Harrison, N. J., E. R. Woolliams, and N. P. Fox. "Evaluation of spectral irradiance transfer standards." Metrologia 37, no. 5 (October 2000): 453–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/37/5/24.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Burk-Rafel, Jesse, and Jacqueline Heath. "New Medical Student Performance Evaluation Standards." Academic Medicine 92, no. 6 (June 2017): 733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001705.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Farrington, David P. "Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research." ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587, no. 1 (May 2003): 49–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716202250789.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Covert, R. W. "Ethics in Evaluation: Beyond the Standards." American Journal of Evaluation 9, no. 1 (February 1, 1988): 32–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821408800900103.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Lincoln, Yvonna S. "The ers standards for program evaluation." Evaluation and Program Planning 8, no. 3 (January 1985): 251–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(85)90046-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Gentile, Francesco, Luigi Giuri, Franco Guida, Emilio Montolivo, and Michele Volpe. "Security evaluation in information technology standards." Computers & Security 13, no. 8 (January 1994): 647–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4048(94)90044-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Yao, Gui Fen. "Quality Evaluation for Automobile Seat Woven Fabric." Advanced Materials Research 1004-1005 (August 2014): 1427–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1004-1005.1427.

Full text
Abstract:
Industrial textiles is designed with engineering structure textiles. Transportation textiles is one of the main types of industrial textiles. Automobile seat fabric is one of the decorative materials in automobile textile fabrics. The fabric should have soft handle, good air permeability, coordinate color, luxury and generous pattern, wear-resisting, anti-fouling, flame retardant, certain friction factor and antistatic property. In recent years, requirements for automobile textiles of safety, health, environmental protection is more and more high. In order to evaluate the automobile seat woven fabric quality, need to have a simple and effective standard. Quality indexes should be comprehensive. The test method of quality index should be operable. In the existing relevant standards, the test content is not consistent. The existing relevant standards are national standards, textile industry standards and automotive industry standards. Within textile industry standard FZ/T 24005-2010 wool textiles for chair, the technical requirements include safety specification, classification rules, physical quality rating, internal quality rating, appearance quality rating. For flame retardant performance, must meet the following requirements: damaged length ≤200mm, afterflame time ≤15s. Within national standard GB 8410-2006, flammability of automotive interior materials, for flame retardant performance, must meet the following requirements: burning rate ≤100mm/min. Within automotive industry standard QC/T 633-2009 the seats of passenger vehicles, for safety specification, seat fabric must meet the B grade in GB 18401. Based on some effective standard, established suitable standard for automobile seat woven fabric. The standard covers quality evaluation content, performance levels and the methods of test to be used to determine these performance levels.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Filby, R. H., G. J. Van Berkel, A. E. Bragg, A. Joubert, W. E. Robison, and C. A. Grimm. "Evaluation of residual fuel oil standard reference materials as trace element standards." Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 91, no. 2 (September 1985): 361–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02061039.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Jun, Liu, Liu Chunfeng, Peng Fang, and Zhao Jing. "A preliminary study on the Evaluation Index of Green Service area under the concept of New Green Building Evaluation Standard." E3S Web of Conferences 233 (2021): 01109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123301109.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper compares the evaluation standards of new and old green buildings, and studies the existing evaluation system of Expressway Green Service area, this paper expounds the relationship between the existing Green Service area evaluation system and the new and old green building standards, and finally, combining the new green building evaluation standards and the actual evaluation work, advances the new Green Service Area Evaluation Index, it will guide the revision of the relevant policy standard of the current Green Service area.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Wei, Yongchang, Lei Chen, Yu Qi, Can Wang, Fei Li, Haorong Wang, and Fangyu Chen. "A Complex Network Method in Criticality Evaluation of Air Quality Standards." Sustainability 11, no. 14 (July 18, 2019): 3920. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11143920.

Full text
Abstract:
In recent years, poor air quality has brought serious threats to public health and sustainable development. The air quality standard is an effective prerequisite to ensure the quality of the air. The citation relationships between air quality standards at a certain time point, which reflect technological development and knowledge transition, form a complex network. In this study, an integrated multi-criteria decision making method is proposed to measure the criticality of standards based on a dynamic citation network model. In particular, the Entropy Weight (EW) method is used to set the weights of each node measurement to avoid subjectiveness, while the TOPSIS method is employed to measure the criticality for each air quality standard. A case study based on the data of 444 of China’s national air quality standards reveals that the complex network method facilitates the identification of critical standards effectively. In addition, we found that there exist some structural problems in China’s air quality standard system: the connectivity between standards is insufficient; critical standards are lacking; and the critical standards change over time following the issue of national policies. Finally, policy suggestions are recommended on strengthening inter-standard citation, attaching importance to the revision of critical standards, and the dynamics of critical standards.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Goryunova, Mariya. "Combination of Federal State Educational Standards and Professional Standards, Portfolio of Students." SHS Web of Conferences 69 (2019): 00046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196900046.

Full text
Abstract:
The author examines how federal state educational standards of higher education (FSES-HE) and professional standards can be combined. Methods of assessing the effectiveness of students' research activities through the electronic portfolio of students are being developed. The information about the existing forms of organization of research activities of students of bachelor's, specialist's and master's degree programs at the university, the requirements for the effectiveness of research work at each educational level were analyzed. The main result of the work is the positioning of the electronic student portfolio as a modern effective means of monitoring his educational achievements which allow assessing the acquisition of professional competencies by the student, solving the problems of organization, planning, implementation and qualitative/quantitative evaluation of his research activities implemented within the educational process. Pedagogical monitoring is characterized as a modern means of control and evaluating the effectiveness of research activities, ensuring the efficiency and availability of information. The principles of purposefulness and prognostication, objectivity, integrity and continuity, development and self-organization, systematic and consistent implementation of pedagogical monitoring are revealed. The relevance of score-rating evaluation of the effectiveness of research activities of students as the most adequate and demonstrative system for assessing the success of each student in scientific work is substantiated. It is concluded about the stimulating impact on regular pedagogical monitoring of research activities performed through the electronic portfolio of students.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Carine, Fiona, and Anita Walker. "Establishing Electronic Patient Record Standards Using Paper-Based Record Functions and Standards." Health Information Management 27, no. 2 (June 1997): 78–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/183335839702700207.

Full text
Abstract:
The South Australian Health Commission has embarked on a long term project to establish an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) for South Australia. The process requires extensive evaluation at the conclusion of each phase of development using a range of existing and purpose-developed evaluation tools. This paper describes a purpose-developed evaluation tool that uses the functional aspects of, and existing standards for, paper-based medical records in hospitals as its basis. The resulting EPR Standards are a tool which can be used to establish a benchmark against which to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of an electronic patient record.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Chunovkina, Anna, Nikita Zviagin, and Natalia Burmistrova. "Evaluation of inconsistent data of key comparisons of measurement standards." ACTA IMEKO 2, no. 2 (January 15, 2014): 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v2i2.85.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper deals with evaluation of inconsistent data obtained in key comparisons of national measurement standards. The concept "equivalence of measurement standards" is discussed in the context of metrological compatibility of measurement results. Applications of different methods for evaluating inconsistent data are briefly considered. An explicit practical approach is proposed for evaluating of inconsistent data. The application of the approach is illustrated by analysis of the results of CCQM-K5.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Velychko, О. М., and T. B. Gordiyenko. "ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION THE RESULTS OF KEY COMPARISONS OF NATIONAL STANDARDS." Key title: Zbìrnik naukovih pracʹ Odesʹkoï deržavnoï akademìï tehnìčnogo regulûvannâ ta âkostì -, no. 1(16) (2020): 15–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.32684/2412-5288-2020-1-16-15-20.

Full text
Abstract:
In the framework of the Agreement of International Committee on Weights and Measures on Mutual Recognition of national standards, calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes (NMIs), key comparisons serve as the basis for establishing calibration and measurement capabilities of NMI with implemented quality management system. On this basis, the competence of a specific NMI to perform calibration of working standards and measuring instruments for the customer laboratories is determined. In order to attract as many NMIs as possible to participate in key comparisons of standards, Regional Metrology Organizations are widely involved in conducting such comparisons. The practical application of traditional evaluation the results of key standards comparisons and displaying them in the special database of key comparisons (KCDB) of International Bureau on Weights and Measures (BIPM) may be difficult for some NMIs and for national laboratories accredited by national accreditation bodies that wish to use NMI calibration services. This is due to the fact that the KCDB BIPM only displays the degree of equivalence of a NMI standard with corresponding expanded uncertainty without any other characteristics for evaluating calibration or measurement capabilities. The paper presents a proposed alternative evaluation of results of key comparisons of standards, which simplifies the analysis of calibration services by NMIs. It envisages the use as a criterion of consistency of the results obtained from the comparisons of the En index to analyze the degree of equivalence of the NMI standard and the corresponding extended uncertainty. The practical application of the evaluation for results of key comparisons of standards of electric power is considered. This contributes to a more streamlined calibration of work standards for specific established purposes for both NMIs and accredited laboratories.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography