Academic literature on the topic 'Epistemic inequality'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Epistemic inequality.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Epistemic inequality":
Pohlhaus, Gaile. "Propaganda, Inequality, and Epistemic Movement." THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 31, no. 3 (November 16, 2016): 345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/theoria.16450.
Cusick, Carolyn. "Epistemic Inequality and Educating Friendship." Philosophy in the Contemporary World 28, no. 2 (2022): 42–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/pcw202228210.
Go, Julian. "Decolonizing Sociology: Epistemic Inequality and Sociological Thought." Social Problems 64, no. 2 (April 4, 2017): 194–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx002.
Stanley, Jason. "Precis of How Propaganda Works." THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 31, no. 3 (November 16, 2016): 287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/theoria.16512.
Verloo, Mieke. "Gender Knowledge, and Opposition to the Feminist Project: Extreme-Right Populist Parties in the Netherlands." Politics and Governance 6, no. 3 (September 14, 2018): 20–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1456.
Go, Julian. "Race, Empire, and Epistemic Exclusion: Or the Structures of Sociological Thought." Sociological Theory 38, no. 2 (June 2020): 79–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735275120926213.
Cook-Lundgren, Emily, Ishbel McWha-Hermann, and Thomas Stephen Calvard. "Expatriate-Local Inequality as Epistemic Dominance in International Development Organizations." Academy of Management Proceedings 2020, no. 1 (August 2020): 17352. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.17352abstract.
Moore, Alfred. "Deliberative elitism? Distributed deliberation and the organization of epistemic inequality." Critical Policy Studies 10, no. 2 (April 2, 2016): 191–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1165126.
Wylie, Alison. "Social Constructionist Arguments in Harding'sScience and Social Inequality." Hypatia 23, no. 4 (December 2008): 201–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01441.x.
Bar-Itzhak, Chen. "Intellectual Captivity." Journal of World Literature 5, no. 1 (February 14, 2020): 79–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24056480-00403400.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Epistemic inequality":
Hoffmann, Nimi. "The knowledge commons, pan-Africanism, and epistemic inequality: a study of CODESRIA." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/60303.
German, Isabel. "La construction de la vérité au sein de la justice pénale restaurative intra-judiciaire : équité et justice épistémiques dans la décision juridique." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Pau, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024PAUU2157.
Given the relevant role of the communicative interaction in the restorative justice model, this thesis has focused on knowing and understanding the process of truth construction in the practices of intra-judicial restorative criminal justice, taking into consideration the situations of inequality and epistemic injustices that may appear in this process, and determining the conditions that this device must fulfil to achieve an epistemically equitable and fair legal decision.The study carried out leads to the conclusion that the process of truth construction in restorative justice is of an intersubjective nature, in line with intersubjective theories of truth. In this process, the communicative exchange between the parties concerned is at the core, where the agreement is not the essential to achieve the aim of the restorative process, namely reparation. And an intersubjective process of truth construction focuses on the conditions of validity of the interaction between people. Thus, in the restorative justice process, an effective communicative interaction must fulfil the necessary conditions of epistemic fairness and justice. Hence, the legal decision can be considered more fair and equitable
Hällje, Pelle. "Ett skepp kommer lastat…med mänskliga rättigheter : Bruket av ett begrepp hos Sida och dess föregångare 1956–2019." Thesis, Mittuniversitetet, Institutionen för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-39164.
This study examines how the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)and its predecessors have used the concept of human rights in annual reports 1956 – 2019, and what relation this use has to epistemic equality. Epistemic power is the power over the conceptsand discourses, forming the basis for the understanding of international development. Human rights as a notion is almost invisible in the reports until 1980. As from the end of the 1980s and onwards, the concept is associated to democracy in a way that dominates large parts of the reports. In the 2010s, the concept is also increasingly connected to gender equality and environmental issues. Although there are examples of reproduction of epistemic inequality or mirroring of an eurocentric universalism, these are proportionately few. Due to Sida’s mission, it’s natural to focus on problems and solutions in the Global South. At the same time, this contributes to an epistemically unequal entirety of discourses, in which the overall picture is that the Global South is where both obstacles and solutions to sustainable development are to be found. This way, changes in the Global North that are also necessary to achieve global sustainable development will not be paid sufficient attention.
Godkänt datum 2020-06-05
Books on the topic "Epistemic inequality":
Andreasen, Robin, and Heather Doty. Measuring Inequality. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467715.003.0007.
Hutchison, Katrina, Catriona Mackenzie, and Marina Oshana, eds. Social Dimensions of Moral Responsibility. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190609610.001.0001.
Dann, Philipp, Michael Riegner, and Maxim Bönnemann, eds. The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850403.001.0001.
Silberstein, Michael, W. M. Stuckey, and Timothy McDevitt. Relational Blockworld and Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807087.003.0005.
Theurer, Karina, and Wolfgang Kaleck, eds. Dekoloniale Rechtskritik und Rechtspraxis. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748903628.
Nagar, Richa. Hungry Translations. University of Illinois Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5622/illinois/9780252042577.001.0001.
Book chapters on the topic "Epistemic inequality":
Landström, Karl, and Heaven Crawley. "Migration Research, Coloniality and Epistemic Injustice." In The Palgrave Handbook of South–South Migration and Inequality, 83–104. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39814-8_5.
Barrotta, Pierluigi, and Roberto Gronda. "Epistemic Inequality and the Grounds of Trust in Scientific Experts." In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 81–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44018-3_6.
Napoli, Philip M. "Epistemic Rights, Information Inequalities, and Public Policy." In Epistemic Rights in the Era of Digital Disruption, 47–62. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45976-4_4.
Keval, Harshad. "“Merit”, “Success” and the Epistemic Logics of Whiteness in Racialised Education Systems." In Palgrave Studies in Race, Inequality and Social Justice in Education, 127–37. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65668-3_10.
Cammaerts, Bart. "On the Need to Revalue Old Radical Imaginaries to Assert Epistemic Media and Communication Rights Today." In Epistemic Rights in the Era of Digital Disruption, 31–45. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45976-4_3.
Ghemmour, Riadh. "Reimagining Research Methods Curriculum in Education Otherwise: A Decolonial Turn." In Creative Ruptions for Emergent Educational Futures, 223–43. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52973-3_10.
White, Peter R. R., Giuseppe Mammone, and David Caldwell. "Linguistically based inequality, multilingual education and a genre-based literacy development pedagogy: insights from the Australian experience." In Language in Epistemic Access, 80–95. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315229744-6.
Hartmann, Martin. "Introduction." In The Feeling of Inequality, 1—C0N42. Oxford University PressNew York, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197500866.003.0001.
Herzog, Lisa. "The Epistemic Benefits of Social Justice." In Citizen Knowledge, 250—C10N84. Oxford University PressNew York, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197681718.003.0010.
Moore, Alfred. "Deliberative elitism? Distributed deliberation and the organization of epistemic inequality." In Deliberative Systems in Theory and Practice, 53–70. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351182645-4.
Reports on the topic "Epistemic inequality":
Teixeira, Mariana. Vulnerability: A Critical Tool for Conviviality-Inequality Studies. Maria Sibylla Merian Centre Conviviality-Inequality in Latin America, May 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46877/teixeira.2022.44.