Academic literature on the topic 'Epistemic challenge'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Epistemic challenge.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Epistemic challenge"
Puleri, Marco. "Russophonia as an Epistemic Challenge." Ab Imperio 2023, no. 1 (2023): 76–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0007.
Full textLumbard, Joseph E. B. "Islam and the Challenge of Epistemic Sovereignty." Religions 15, no. 4 (March 26, 2024): 406. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel15040406.
Full textVelmurugan, Giajenthiran, and Jacob Gorm Davidsen. "Negotiating Epistemic Experience vs. Epistemic Expertise in PBL Supervision." Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education 12, no. 1 (November 28, 2024): 92–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v12i1.8284.
Full textMarrone, Pierpaolo. "Epistemic Democracy and Technopolitics." International Journal of Technoethics 13, no. 1 (January 2022): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijt.291551.
Full textMurris, Karin. "The Epistemic Challenge of Hearing Child’s Voice." Studies in Philosophy and Education 32, no. 3 (January 20, 2013): 245–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9349-9.
Full textSchulz, Claudia, Christian M. Meyer, and Iryna Gurevych. "Challenges in the Automatic Analysis of Students’ Diagnostic Reasoning." Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 33 (July 17, 2019): 6974–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016974.
Full textShaw, Elizabeth. "Expanding The Scope of The Epistemic Argument to Cover Nonpunitive Incapacitation." Diametros 21, no. 79 (April 19, 2024): 132–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.33392/diam.1931.
Full textDe Preester, Helena, and John Dorsch. "Descartes on the Passions of the Soul and Internal Emotions: Two Challenges for Interoception Research in Emotions." Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 54, no. 1 (November 5, 2021): 65–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24689300-bja10021.
Full textKuzmanovic, Stefan. "Epistemic contextualism: Problems of disagreement and retraction." Theoria, Beograd 66, no. 4 (2023): 15–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo2304015k.
Full textLycett, Mark, and Chris Partridge. "The challenge of epistemic divergence in IS development." Communications of the ACM 52, no. 6 (June 2009): 127–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1516046.1516079.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Epistemic challenge"
Fenoy, Anne. "Les défis épistémiques de la sclérose latérale amyotrophique (SLA)." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne université, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024SORUL140.
Full textAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), better known in France as Charcot's disease, is a neuro-evolutionary disease that has been described in many ways: "the worst disease", "the cruelest disease", "the least rare disease", "the most brilliant discovery of Jean-Martin Charcot". These formulas give a unique status to this disease, which is still little studied by philosophy, unlike, for example, Alzheimer's disease, a neuro-evolutionary disease that is much more common. They were a catalyst for the philosophical inquiry that constitutes this work, which focuses on the epistemic challenges of ALS. Epistemic challenges are the theoretical and practical problems that can arise from a plurality of perspectives (or epistemic plurality) on the same object. They are challenges in the sense that the ALS community needs to address them in order to avoid possible harmful consequences. This thesis examines three of them in particular. In the first part, the idea that ALS is the exemplary disease in terms of medical difficulties in understanding and treating it is identified, analyzed, and challenged. It is shown that in approaching discourses on ALS it is important to take into account the distinction between ALS as studied and characterized by medicine and biology (disease), ALS as lived experience (illness), and ALS as social phenomenon (sickness). The second part examines the historiography of ALS. It is shown that the focus on the genesis of the concept of ALS in Charcot's work may be a factor of ignorance for the history of medicine and for the current conception of ALS. The third part examines different categorizations of ALS: ALS as a disease or syndrome, as a motor disease and as a rare disease. Epistemological, practical, and ethical issues are highlighted in light of their relevance and limitations. By examining the discourses on ALS, this thesis aims to nuance and dialogue them in order to propose an overall reading grid for this complex subject. Addressing the epistemic challenges of ALS also serves to show the extent to which considering the concept of ALS as a 'boundary object' can be fruitful, including in philosophy, particularly in order to account for the conceptual fragmentation at work when it comes to the concept of disease
Ashe, David Mark. "Upper primary school students’ scientific and socio-scientific thinking: A case study investigating epistemic challenges in year-six inquiry science lessons." Thesis, The University of Sydney, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/13350.
Full textBraddock, Matthew C. "Debunking Challenges to Moral Realism." Diss., 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/5800.
Full textHeightened awareness of the evolutionary, socio-cultural, and psychological origins of our moral judgments pushes many of us in the direction of moral skepticism, in the direction of doubting the objective truth of our moral judgments. But should awareness of the origins of our moral judgments shake our confidence in them? Are there good moral debunking challenges or debunking arguments from premises concerning the accessible origins of our moral judgments to skeptical conclusions regarding them? In vigorous pursuit of these questions, this dissertation sifts three promising moral debunking challenges to moral realism, namely Richard Joyce's (2001) evolutionary debunking argument from epistemic insensitivity, Sharon Street's (2006) "Darwinian Dilemma," and David Enoch's (2010) "Epistemological Challenge." It is argued that each challenge faces cogent objections that not only demonstrate the inadequacy of the best debunking challenges available but also instructively guide us to the development of new and more forceful debunking challenges to moral realism. This dissertation develops two new and forceful debunking challenges, both of which target the epistemic reliability and justification of our moral judgments on realist views of the moral facts. The first new debunking challenge starts from the premise that the best explanation of our moral judgments does not appeal to their truth and invokes a new species of epistemic insensitivity to secure the conclusion that our moral belief-forming processes are epistemically unreliable. The second new debunking challenge reasons that the best explanation of the fact that moral realists have no good explanation of the reliability of our moral belief-forming processes is that there is no such reliability.
Dissertation
Books on the topic "Epistemic challenge"
Vahid, Hamid. Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230596214.
Full textBaldassarri, Fabrizio. Epistemic Practices and Plant Classification in Premodern European Botanical Knowledge. Nieuwe Prinsengracht 89 1018 VR Amsterdam Nederland: Amsterdam University Press, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463728072.
Full textVahid, Hamid. Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Find full textVahid, H. Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Find full textVahid, Professor Hamid, and Hamid Professor Vahid. Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Find full textSmithson, Robert. A New Epistemic Argument for Idealism. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198746973.003.0002.
Full textGoldberg, Sanford C. Epistemic Responsibility in Social Context. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793670.003.0008.
Full textGoodin, Robert E., and Kai Spiekermann. An Epistemic Theory of Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823452.001.0001.
Full textGoldman, Alvin I. Gettier and the Epistemic Appraisal of Philosophical Intuition. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198724551.003.0013.
Full textSnow, Nancy E. Adaptive Misbeliefs, Value Trade-Offs, and Epistemic Responsibility. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779681.003.0003.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Epistemic challenge"
Sharadin, Nathaniel P. "The Functionalist Challenge." In Epistemic Instrumentalism Explained, 84–98. New York: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003096726-6.
Full textMatthiessen, Hannes Ole. "A Default and Challenge Model of Perceptual Entitlement." In Epistemic Entitlement, 85–133. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137414984_4.
Full textDei, George J. Sefa, Wambui Karanja, and Grace Erger. "Articulating the Epistemic Challenge." In Critical Studies of Education, 37–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84201-7_2.
Full textVahid, Hamid. "Argument from Epistemic Conservatism." In Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge, 157–80. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230596214_9.
Full textKhoo, Justin. "The Disagreement Challenge to Contextualism." In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, 257–71. 1 [edition]. | New York : Routledge, 2017. | Series: Routledge handbooks in philosophy: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315745275-21.
Full textGerken, Mikkel. "Slow-Switch Cases and the Individualist Challenge." In Epistemic Reasoning and the Mental, 156–227. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137025524_5.
Full textUde, Donald Mark C. "The Epistemic Ramifications of Modernity." In Endangered African Knowledges and the Challenge of Modernity, 98–129. London: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032705712-4.
Full textVahid, Hamid. "Introduction." In Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge, 1–3. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230596214_1.
Full textVahid, Hamid. "Argument from Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE)." In Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge, 181–98. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230596214_10.
Full textVahid, Hamid. "The Epistemological Significance of Transcendental Arguments." In Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge, 199–215. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230596214_11.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Epistemic challenge"
Ilbiz, Ethem, Yusaf Akbar, and Andrea Tracogna. "Reducing Transaction Costs of Epistemic Recognition through Online Platforms: Empowering Marginalised Academic Communities to Challenge Epistemic Injustice." In International Conference on Sharing Economy and Contemporary Business Models: Theory and Practice – “IC-SHARE 2024”, 81–85. University of Belgrade - Faculty of Organizational Sciences, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.62863/fuqr6588.
Full textDelgrande, James P., Joshua Sack, Gerhard Lakemeyer, and Maurice Pagnucco. "Epistemic Logic of Likelihood and Belief." In Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-22}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/360.
Full textTombolato, Monica. "RENEWING THE CURRICULUM TO PROMOTE EPISTEMIC COGNITION IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY: SOME PROCEDURAL PRINCIPLES." In International Conference on Education and New Developments. inScience Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36315/2022v1end087.
Full textGurney, Kim. "Epistemic Disobedience: Institution-Building as Artistic Practice." In Arts Research Africa 2022 Conference Proceedings. Arts Research Africa, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54223/10539/35901.
Full textMochizuki, Toshio, Clark A. Chinn, Hiroki Oura, and Etsuji Yamaguchi. "Recognizing Cherry-Picked Data in Scientific Information: Epistemic Challenge toward Understanding Comprehensive Evidence." In 18th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2024. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.22318/icls2024.634461.
Full textAmmon, Sabine, Alexandra Kljagin, Juliane Rettschlag, and Martina Vortel. "The Berlin ethics certificate: conceptualizing interdisciplinarity as a core building block of ethics in engineering education." In SEFI 50th Annual conference of The European Society for Engineering Education. Barcelona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788412322262.1422.
Full textFuentes Acevedo, Patricia. "Co-Designing With Families to Challenge Dominant Perspectives and Redistribute Epistemic Authority in Elementary Mathematics (Poster 2)." In AERA 2024. USA: AERA, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/ip.24.2105355.
Full textMoon, Min-Yeong, K. K. Choi, Nicholas Gaul, and David Lamb. "Treating Epistemic Uncertainty Using Bootstrapping Selection of Input Distribution Model for Confidence-Based Reliability Assessment." In ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2018-85946.
Full textMalá, Markéta. "Hedging like a professional: A corpus-driven approach to interactional metadiscourse in English learner academic writing." In 9th Brno Conference on Linguistics Studies in English. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0212-2022-5.
Full textMihaylov, Valentin. "EPISTEMIC JUSTICE VS. ACADEMIC HEGEMONY: CRITICAL GEOPOLITICS OF THE GLOBAL ORDER OF KNOWLEDGE." In Book of Abstracts and Contributed Papers, 116. Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić" SASA, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/csge5.72vm.
Full textReports on the topic "Epistemic challenge"
Report on the 1st Annual “Out of War” Conference “Global Insights to Support Strategies for the Reintegration of Ukraine's Frontline Returnees”. Corioli Institute, February 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.59498/07783.
Full text